Characterization of autotransplant-related thrombocytopenia by evaluation of glycocalicin and reticulated platelets

Reference intervals for absolute and percentage immature platelet fraction using the Sysmex XN-10 automated haematology analyser in a UK population

BACKGROUND

Immature platelet fraction (IPF) estimation is a non-invasive and sensitive test that is available on recently introduced Sysmex XN-series of automated haematology analysers. It is a direct cellular indicator of thrombopoiesis. The aim of this study was to establish reference intervals for IPF, for both absolute (A-IPF) and percentage (%-IPF) measurements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 2366 samples that met the inclusion criteria were assayed for full blood count on the Sysmex XN-10 and a non-parametric percentile method was used for calculating the reference intervals.

RESULTS

After the outliers were excluded, the reference interval for %-IPF and A-IPF on Sysmex XN-10 were 1.6-10.1% and 4.37-23.21 × 10⁹/L in total individuals, respectively. There was a statistical significance noted between the sexes (p = .004) for %-IPF, therefore a sex-specific reference interval was established, which was 1.8-10.0% for the males and 1.5-10.1% for females. No significant difference in sex status for A-IPF and age status for both %-IPF and A-IPF was observed. A very poor correlation was estimated between age versus %-IPF, ρ = 0.0156, and age versus A-IPF, ρ = -0.0023, indicating that there is no overall biological relationship between age and these parameters. As expected, a strong correlation between %-IPF and A-IPF was noted which could be attributed to their inter-relatedness.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale study showed comparable reference intervals with the previous studies for %-IPF and A-IPF in a UK population. It found the need to establish sex-specific reference intervals for %-IPF, but not for A-IPF, whereas reference intervals were found to be stable across the age range.

Reticulated platelets as a screening test to identify thrombocytopenia aetiology

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a common haematological abnormality and no simple diagnostic test is available to diagnose thrombocytopenia pathogenesis.

AIM

To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of reticulated platelets (RP) as a diagnostic test for thrombocytopenia with increased thrombopoietic activity.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study in thrombocytopenic patients.

METHODS

A direct, whole-blood, dual-labelling flow cytometric method was used. Direct, whole-blood double coverage was achieved using a monoclonal anti-glycoprotein (GP)-III antibody (CD61 PerCP) for platelet identification and thiazole orange (Retic-count) as platelet mARN stain.

RESULTS

RP were measured in 101 thrombocytopenic patients and 104 non-thrombocytopenic controls. The mean RP percentage in 60 thrombocytopenic patients with no increased thrombopoietic activity was 7.5% (CI for 95%: 5.2-9.7) and RP absolute number was 3.2 x 10(9)/l (CI for 95%: 2.1-4.3). The mean RP percentage in 41 thrombocytopenic patients with increased thrombopoietic activity was 30.3% (CI for 95%: 25.1-35.5) and RP absolute number was 6.2 (CI for 95%: 4.8-7.7). The RP percentage cut-off for a diagnosis of thrombocytopenia with increased thrombopoietic activity was 11% [sensitivity 93%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) 95%].

CONCLUSION

RP measurement by flow cytometry, directly from whole-blood, is a useful screening test to differentiate between thrombocytopenia with high or low thrombopoietic activity. A RP percentage in excess of 11%, has a high sensitivity and good specificity for a diagnosis of thrombocytopenia with increased thrombopoietic activity.

Measurement of reticulated platelets by simple flow cytometry: An indirect thrombocytopoietic marker

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether measurement of reticulated platelets (RP) by flow cytometry directly from whole blood, with no fixation or manipulation, is as useful a thrombocytopoietic marker as other more complex techniques.

METHODS

RP percentage was prospectively assessed in thrombocytopenic patients (platelets <100x10(9)/L) and non-thrombocytopenic controls using a direct, whole-blood, dual-labelling flow cytometric method. Direct, whole-blood double coverage was achieved using a monoclonal antiglycoprotein (GP)-III antibody (CD61-PerCP(R)) for platelet identification and thiazol orange (Retic-count(R)) as platelet mARN stain. After establishing thrombocytopenia etiology, patients were grouped according to whether their rate of thrombopoiesis was increased or decreased.

RESULTS

RP were measured in 53 thrombocytopenic patients with several etiologies and in 53 non-thrombocytopenic controls. The mean RP in 14 thrombocytopenic patients with no increased thrombopoietic activity was 4.8% (95% CI: 3.2-6.4) and the RP absolute number was 1.98x10(9)/L (95% CI: 1.3-2.6). The mean RP in 17 thrombocytopenic patients with increased thrombopoietic activity was 29.4% (95% CI: 24.7-34.1) and the RP absolute number was 7.24x10(9)/L (95% CI: 4.9-9.5).

CONCLUSIONS

RP measurement by flow cytometry, directly from whole blood without manipulation, is a useful screening test to differentiate thrombocytopenia with high or low thrombopoietic activity.

Evaluation assays measuring platelet kinetics in bone marrow and peripheral blood. An overview

Platelets play an important role in haemostasis and thrombosis. For an understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of thrombocytopenia, it is not sufficient to measure only the platelet count. Platelet kinetic parameters, such as platelet survival and turnover, might be useful because many thrombocytopenia related disorders result from the interaction between production, utilization or destruction, and sequestration of platelets. Therefore, measuring platelet turnover with radiolabelled platelets could be a sensitive and qualitative tool for clinicians. However, the method does not enjoy widespread use because it has some serious drawbacks, such as the problems associated with the manipulation of blood and platelets, and the use of radioactivity. Recently, other useful assays for measuring platelet fluxes have been described in the literature, including plasma thrombopoietin and glycocalicin. In this review, these new tests will be described, compared with the classical method using radiolabelled platelets, and finally evaluated for their usefulness in clinical practice.

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is induced during human megakaryopoiesis and characterizes newly formed platelets

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 or -2 and prostaglandin (PG) synthases catalyze the formation of various PGs and thromboxane (TX) A(2). We have investigated the expression and activity of COX-1 and -2 during human megakaryocytopoiesis. We analyzed megakaryocytes from bone marrow biopsies and derived from thrombopoietin-treated CD34(+) hemopoietic progenitor cells in culture. Platelets were obtained from healthy donors and patients with high platelet regeneration because of immune thrombocytopenia or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. By immunocytochemistry, COX-1 was observed in CD34(+) cells and in megakaryocytes at each stage of maturation, whereas COX-2 was induced after 6 days of culture, and remained detectable in mature megakaryocytes. CD34(+) cells synthesized more PGE(2) than TXB(2) (214 +/- 50 vs. 30 +/- 10 pg/10(6) cells), whereas the reverse was true in mature megakaryocytes (TXB(2) 8,440 +/- 2,500 vs. PGE(2) 906 +/- 161 pg/10(6) cells). By immunostaining, COX-2 was observed in <10% of circulating platelets from healthy controls, whereas up to 60% of COX-2-positive platelets were found in patients. A selective COX-2 inhibitor reduced platelet production of both PGE(2) and TXB(2) to a significantly greater extent in patients than in healthy subjects. Finally, we found that COX-2 and the inducible PGE-synthase were coexpressed in mature megakaryocytes and in platelets. We conclude that both COX-isoforms contribute to prostanoid formation during human megakaryocytopoiesis and that COX-2-derived PGE(2) and TXA(2) may play an unrecognized role in inflammatory and hemostatic responses in clinical syndromes associated with high platelet turnover.