Allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplants in Australia, 1996--a multi-centre retrospective comparison of the use of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for acute radiation syndrome: innovative medical approaches in military medicine

After a radiological or nuclear event, acute radiation syndrome (ARS) will present complex medical challenges that could involve the treatment of hundreds to thousands of patients. Current medical doctrine is based on limited clinical data and remains inadequate. Efforts to develop medical innovations that address ARS complications are unlikely to be generated by industry because of market uncertainties specific to this type of injury. A prospective strategy could be the integration of cellular therapy to meet the medical demands of ARS. The most clinically advanced cellular therapy to date is the administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Results of currently published investigations describing MSC safety and efficacy in a variety of injury and disease models demonstrate the unique qualities of this reparative cell population in adapting to the specific requirements of the damaged tissue in which the cells integrate. This report puts forward a rationale for the further evaluation of MSC therapy to address the current unmet medical needs of ARS. We propose that the exploration of this novel therapy for the treatment of the multivariate complications of ARS could be of invaluable benefit to military medicine.

Heterogeneous functions of perinatal mesenchymal stromal cells require a preselection before their banking for clinical use

Perinatal sources of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have raised growing interest because they are readily and widely available with minimal ethical/legal issues and can easily be stored for allogeneic settings. In addition, perinatal tissues are known to be important in mediating the fetomaternal tolerance of pregnancy, which confer upon perinatal-MSCs (P-MSCs) a particular interest in immunomodulation. It has been recently shown that it is possible to deeply modify the secreted factor profiles of MSCs with different cytokine stimuli such as interferon gamma or tumor necrosis factor alpha to license MSCs for a better immunosuppresive potential. Therefore, we aimed to compare adult bone marrow-MSCs with MSCs from perinatal tissues (cord blood, umbilical cord, amnion, and chorion) on their in vitro immunological and stromacytic efficiencies under different priming conditions. Our results showed that P-MSCs had a potential to modulate the in vitro immune response and be useful for hematopoietic progenitor cell ex vivo expansion. However, we showed contrasted effects of cytokine priming embedded in an important between-donor variability. In conclusion, our study highlights the importance to elaborate predicitive in vitro tests to screen between-donor variability of perinatal tissues for banking allogeneic standardized MSCs.

Influence of cyclosporine on the occurrence of nephrotoxicity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review

Cyclosporine, a drug used in immunosuppression protocols for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that has a narrow therapeutic index, may cause various adverse reactions, including nephrotoxicity. This has a direct clinical impact on the patient. This study aims to summarize available evidence in the scientific literature on the use of cyclosporine in respect to its risk factor for the development of nephrotoxicity in patients submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A systematic review was made with the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, SciELO and Cochrane BVS. The keywords used were: “bone marrow transplantation” OR “stem cell transplantation” OR “grafting, bone marrow” AND cyclosporine OR cyclosporin OR “risk factors” AND “acute kidney injury” OR “acute kidney injuries” OR “acute renal failure” OR “acute renal failures” OR “nephrotoxicity”. The level of scientific evidence of the studies was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. The final sample was composed of 19 studies, most of which (89.5%) had an observational design, evidence level 2B and pointed to an incidence of nephrotoxicity above 30%. The available evidence, considered as good quality and appropriate for the analyzed event, indicates that cyclosporine represents a risk factor for the occurrence of nephrotoxicity, particularly when combined with amphotericin B or aminoglycosides, agents commonly used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.

The use of chemokine receptor agonists in stem cell mobilization

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological mobilization has been exploited as a means to obtain hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) for hematopoietic reconstitution. HSPCs mobilized from bone marrow into peripheral blood (PB) are a preferred source of stem cells for transplantation, because they are easily accessible and evidence indicates that they engraft faster after transplantation than HSPCs directly harvested from bone marrow (BM) or umbilical cord blood (UCB).

AREAS COVERED

Since chemokine-chemokine receptor axes are involved in retention of HSPCs in the BM microenvironment, chemokine receptor agonists have been proposed as therapeutics to facilitate the mobilization process. These compounds include agonists of the CXCR4 receptor expressed on HSPCs (CTCE-0021 and ATI-2341) or chemokines binding to chemokine receptors expressed on granuclocytes and monocytes (e.g., CXCL2, also known as the growth-related oncogene protein-beta (Gro-β); CCL3, also known as macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α); or CXCL8, also known as IL-8) could be employed alone or in combination with other mobilizing agents (e.g., G-CSF or Plerixafor (AMD3100)). We discuss the current state of knowledge about chemokine receptor agonists and the rationale for their application in mobilization protocols.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence is accumulating that CXCR4 receptor agonists could be employed alone or with other agents as mobilizing drugs. In particular they may provide an alternative for patients that are poor mobilizers.

Equivalent survival for sibling and unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

Recent studies have shown comparable survival outcomes for unrelated donor (URD) stem cell transplantation in chronic myelogenous leukemia compared to sibling donors. We compared outcomes for 105 patients aged 16 to 59 years undergoing URD transplants for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) who were reported to the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry between 1992 and 2002, and a strictly selected matching set of 105 HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants. There was no significant difference between URD and MSD controls in the distributions of time from diagnosis to transplant, donor-recipient sex match, prior therapies, donor age, or performance status. The median follow-up of live URD patients was 4.4 years and for live MSD controls was 6.3 years. There were 18 good risk (complete remission [CR]1) and 87 poor risk (>CR1) recipients in both URD and sibling groups. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different for good-risk URD and sibling donor recipients (62% versus 40%, P = .2), or poor-risk URD and sibling recipients (21% versus 25%, P = .2). In a stratified multivariate Cox regression model, the independent adverse risk factors for DFS were recipient cytomegalovirus positivity (P = .01) and the interaction of URD and earlier year of transplant (P = .006). Both neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly more rapid in the sibling group, but transplant-related mortality at 100 days was not significantly different. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease grade II or above at 100 days. Relapse occurred in 28% of good risk URD subjects and 16% of siblings (P = .3), and in poor risk subjects 39% and 29%, respectively (P = .2). Based on this data, URD allografts should be considered in AML patients without a matched sibling donor. This study provides a rationale for a larger prospective study of risk factors in allogeneic transplantation for AML and a guide on the subset of patients who may most benefit from an unrelated donor allograft in AML.

Allogeneic transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Developing conditioning regimens with low toxicity, at the same time as preserving an effective graft versus tumour response, is pivotal to expanding the scope for allogeneic transplantation in older patients with MDS. With the introduction of reduced intensity conditioned regimens, transplant centres worldwide are able to offer allogeneic HSCT to a much larger cohort of patients. Graft versus host disease (GvHD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, however with the use of T-cell depletion, centres have been able to utilise volunteer unrelated donors with an increasing degree of HLA disparity. The graft versus dysplasia effect resulting from allogeneic HSCT and the infusion of donor leukocytes has led to a greater understanding of the immunological mechanisms that govern outcome following transplantation in MDS.

Factors predicting success or failure associated with common types of transplants

The ability to predict clinical outcomes is essential to accurate medical decision analysis. Many accepted bone marrow transplant related prognostic variables are derived from data that is over 20-years old and may or may not be applicable to current medical practice. This report reviews both older data concerning bone marrow transplantation prognostic factors as well as more current reports. In addition to pretransplant variables, this review examines easily measured post-transplant variables that may affect prognosis, as well as data concerning the cellular component of the infused graft in both allogeneic and autologous transplantation.

Primed marrow for autologous and allogeneic transplantation: A review comparing primed marrow to mobilized blood and steady-state marrow

Mobilized peripheral blood collections, obtained following either chemotherapy (with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) or G-CSF administration alone, are rapidly replacing traditional bone marrow harvests as the source of cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. According to the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant and the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registries, for the years 1998 through 2000, blood stem cell (BSC) transplants accounted for about 80% of autologous transplants in the pediatric age group and more than 90% of the autologous transplants among adults. In allogeneic transplantation, where the donor is a healthy family member or normal volunteer, G-CSF-mobilized BSC transplants are being used more and more frequently, accounting for about 20% of allogeneic transplants in the pediatric age range and more than 40% of allogeneic transplants among adults during the same time period. It is not, therefore, too great a stretch to imagine that BSC transplants will soon be, if not already, in the majority for allogeneic transplantation among adults. The principal reason why this is happening is the prevailing view that BSC engraft more rapidly than marrow stem cells (MSC). However, this view is based on comparisons between primed circulating blood cells (BSC) and unprimed resident marrow cells in the steady state (SS-MSC). If the reason why BSC engraft faster than SS-MSC were a consequence of G-CSF used for mobilization, then would priming of MSC by G-CSF (Prim-MSC) accelerate engraftment of marrow as well? We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to see if there were enough data to answer this question.

Blood versus marrow hematopoietic allogeneic graft

Allogeneic G-CSF-mobilized blood cell transplantation (BCT), an alternative to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is associated with enhanced engraftment and accelerated hematopoietic recovery. In addition, immune reconstitution and overall alloreactivity after BCT versus BMT differ significantly. Indeed, despite an increased number of donor T cells infused, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after BCT appears to remain identical or lesser than after BMT. On the other hand, a higher risk of chronic GvHD has been reported after BCT. In a SFGM phase III trial, 101 patients with early leukemia and an HLA-matched sibling donor randomly received a BCT or BMT. BCT was associated with a higher number of infused CD34+ cells, accelerated platelet and neutrophil reconstitution, fewer platelet transfusions and similar acute GvHD incidence. However, chronic GvHD occurred more frequently after BCT. With a median follow-up of 20 months, relapse, survival and leukemia-free survival were not different. In the course of this study, immune parameters related to the graft as well as to early reconstitution were prospectively examined. T cells subsets, B cells, NK cells and monocytes numbers were significantly higher in BC grafts (versus BM). T cells in BC grafts were less activated than in BM grafts. Frequency of IFN-gamma, IL-2- and TNF-alpha-secreting cells and single-cell IFN-gamma production potential was reduced in BC graft. One month after BCT, blood T-cell counts were 3-fold higher than after BMT. Moreover, post-BCT T cells were less activated and counts correlated with the number of T cells infused with the graft, which was not the case after BMT. Several acute hemolysis episodes, resulting from anti-A and/or -B donor-derived Ab directed at Ag present on recipient red blood cells (minor ABO mismatch), have been described after BCT. Recipients indeed exhibited significantly increased anti-A and/or -B Ab titers after BCT, particularly in the setting of a "minor" ABO mismatch. Furthermore, the frequency of anti-HLA Ab early after BCT was significantly increased (despite the reduction in platelet transfusion requirements). The higher number of activated B cells and/or CD4 T cells and monocytes in a BCT graft and/or the higher number of circulating CD4 T- and B-cells after BCT could be associated with the enhanced alloAb production. G-CSF-induced TH2 cytokine profile of the T cells present in the graft could also be contributive. Recent studies have determined that BC grafts contained a higher number of type 2 dendritic cells (DC2), themselves associated with high frequencies of TH2 CD4+ cells. Since chronic GvHD is associated with the occurrence of Ab-mediated auto-immune-like syndromes, it is tempting to speculate that a higher incidence of chronic GvHD may result from these findings. In conclusion, BCT results in clinically relevant distinct hematopoietic and immune reconstitution patterns.