Basiliximab is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Steroid Refractory Acute GVHD: The Hope for a Better Tomorrow

Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-AGVHD) presents a significant barrier to successful outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), despite advancements in GVHD prophylaxis and management. While ruxolitinib therapy has shown improved response rates, survival benefits remain elusive. This review explores the definitions and proposed distinct pathophysiology and treatment landscape of SR-AGVHD. Emerging therapies offer potential, yet further research is critical to better define steroid-refractory populations, improve treatment precision with biomarkers, and overcome resistance, particularly in ruxolitinib-refractory cases.

Combined Cytokine Blockade Therapy (CCBT) Using Basiliximab and Infliximab for Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease (SR-GvHD)

BACKGROUND

The standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is systemic, high-dose glucocorticoids which have historically had limited responses. Combined cytokine blockade therapy (CCBT) with the monoclonal antibodies infliximab (a TNF-α inhibitor) and basiliximab (an IL-2 receptor blocker) has had limited discussion in the literature.

METHODS

Sixty patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD were analyzed. The primary objective was to determine the overall response rate (ORR) for CCBT. Secondary outcomes included non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

ORR for CCBT at day 7, 14, and 28 were 28.3% (17/60; CR 5.0%/PR 23%), 38.3% (23/60; CR 11.3%/PR 27%), and 38.3% (23/60; CR 23.3%/PR 15%), respectively. Patients who received ruxolitinib prior to CCBT had lower ORR (25% CR = 15%/PR = 10%) compared to those who did not (47.5% CR = 27.5%/PR = 20%). In patients with and without ruxolitinib initiated prior to CCBT, NRM at 6 months was 60% (95% CI, 34.5-78) and 47.5% (95% CI, 31-62), while OS at 12 months was 30% (95% CI, 12-50) vs. 40% (95% CI, 25-55), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CCBT has shown potential efficacy in steroid-refractory GI aGvHD, and given the observed ORR when used as second-line therapy, CCBT could serve as an acceptable alternative for patients who are ruxolitinib-intolerant. Ruxolitinib-refractory GI GvHD remains an area of unmet need and CCBT can provide salvage therapy for some patients.

Basiliximab Treatment for Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Basiliximab is an important treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD). We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab treatment in SR-aGVHD patients following matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) (n = 63). Overall response rate (ORR) was 63.5% and 54% at any time and at day 28 after basiliximab treatment. Grade III-IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment predicted a poor ORR after basiliximab treatment. The rates of virus, bacteria, and fungi infections were 54%, 23.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 730 (range, 67-3,042) days, the 1-year probability of overall survival and disease-free survival after basiliximab treatment were 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6%-72.2%) and 55.4% (95% CI = 44.3%-69.2%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after basiliximab treatment were 18.9% (95% CI = 8.3%-29.5%) and 33.8% (95% CI = 21.8%-45.7%), respectively. Comorbidities burden before allo-HSCT, severity of aGVHD and liver aGVHD before basiliximab treatment showed negative influences on survival. Thus, basiliximab was safe and effective treatment for SR-aGVHD following MSD-HSCT.

Ruxolitinib versus basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective study

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; not all patients respond to standard glucocorticoids treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib compared with basiliximab for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD). One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled, 81 in ruxolitinib and 48 in basiliximab group. The overall response (OR) at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group (72.8% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.031), as with complete response (CR) (58.0% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.013). Ruxolitinib led to significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (29.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.021). Besides, ruxolitinib showed higher 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year cumulative incidence of failure-free survival (FFS) (OS: 72.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.008; FFS: 58.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.014). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in ruxolitinib group (16.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005), and the 1-year relapse was not different. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, CMV-associated diseases and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases was similar between the two groups, but EBV viremia was significantly lower in ruxolitinib group (6.2% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that OR and survival were similar in ruxolitinib 5 mg twice daily (bid) and 10 mg bid groups. However, ruxolitinib 10 mg bid treatment markedly reduced 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD compared with 5 mg bid (21.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.016). Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was superior to basiliximab in SR-aGVHD treatment and cGVHD prophylaxis, therefore should be recommended.

Acute graft versus host disease after liver transplantation: where do we stand?

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication after liver transplantation (LT), with an estimated incidence rate of 0.5% to 2% and a mortality rate as high as 75%. The classical target organs of GVHD include the intestines, liver, and skin. The damage of these organs is not easy to detect for the clinician as there is no widely accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic tests; as a result, diagnosis and initiation of therapy are often delayed. Moreover, without prospective clinical trials to reference, evidence guiding therapy is limited. This review summarized the current knowledge, the potential applications and the clinical relevance of GVHD after LT, highlighting novel approaches in grading and management of GVHD.

Treatment of steroid-refractory graft versus host disease in children

Systemic steroids are still the first-line approach in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and the backbone of chronic GvHD management. Refractoriness to steroid represent a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In both backgrounds, several second-line immunosuppressive agents have been tested with variable results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Solid evidence regarding these approaches is still lacking in the pediatric setting where results are mainly derived from adult experiences. Furthermore, the number of treated patients is limited and the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD is lower, resulting in a very heterogeneous approach to this complication by pediatric hematologists. Some conventional therapies and anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies used in the adult setting have been evaluated in children. In recent years, the increasing understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the pathogenesis of GvHD justified the efforts toward the adoption of targeted therapies and non-pharmacologic approaches, with higher response rates and lower immunosuppressive effects. Moreover, many questions regarding the precise timing and setting in which to integrate these new approaches remain unanswered. This Review aims to critically explore the current evidence regarding novel approaches to treat SR-GvHD in pediatric HSCT recipients.

Immune Reconstitution of Patients Who Recovered From Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Basiliximab Treatment

We aimed to identify the characteristics of immune reconstitution (IR) in patients who recovered from steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) after basiliximab treatment. A total of 179, 124, 80, and 92 patients were included in the analysis for IR at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). We observed that IR was fastest for monocytes and CD8⁺ T cells, followed by lymphocytes, CD3⁺ T cells, and CD19⁺ B cells and slowest for CD4⁺ T cells. Almost all immune cell subsets recovered comparably between patients receiving <5 doses and ≥5 doses of basiliximab. Most immune cell subsets recovered comparably between SR-aGVHD patients who recovered after basiliximab treatment and event-free HID HSCT recipients. Patients who recovered from SR-aGVHD after basiliximab treatment experienced satisfactory IR, which suggested that basiliximab may not have prolonged the negative impact on IR in these patients.

Basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A real-world analysis

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the leading causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We investigated the efficacy, safety, prognostic factors, and optimal therapeutic protocol for SR-aGVHD patients treated with basiliximab in a real-world setting. Nine hundred and forty SR-aGVHD patients were recruited from 36 hospitals in China, and 3683 doses of basiliximab were administered. Basiliximab was used as monotherapy (n = 642) or in combination with other second-line treatments (n = 298). The cumulative incidence of overall response rate (ORR) at day 28 after basiliximab treatment was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.5%-82.3%). The probabilities of nonrelapse mortality and overall survival at 3 years after basiliximab treatment were 26.8% (95% CI 24.0%-29.6%) and 64.3% (95% CI 61.2%-67.4%), respectively. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between the monotherapy and combined therapy groups. Combined therapy did not increase the ORR; conversely, it increased the infection rates compared with monotherapy. The multivariate analysis showed that combined therapy, grade III-IV aGVHD, and high-risk refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score before basiliximab treatment were independently associated with the therapeutic response. Hence, we created a prognostic scoring system that could predict the risk of having a decreased likelihood of response after basiliximab treatment. Machine learning was used to develop a protocol that maximized the efficacy of basiliximab while maintaining acceptable levels of infection risk. Thus, real-world data suggest that basiliximab is safe and effective for treating SR-aGVHD.

Established and Emerging Treatments of Skin GvHD

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) of the skin is a severe allo-immune reaction and complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Over the past years, intensive pre-clinical research has led to an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of acute and to a lesser extend chronic GvHD. This has translated into the approval of several new agents for the treatment of both forms of GvHD. This review summarizes the most recent advances in underlying pathomechanisms, clinical trials and newly approved agents for GvHD, with a special focus on skin involvement.

Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression: Infections

Immunosuppressive therapies are currently indicated for a wide range of diseases. As new agents emerge and indications evolve the landscape grows increasingly complex. Therapies can target pathologic immune system over-activation in rheumatologic or autoimmune disease, or conditioning and graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimens may eliminate or inhibit host immune function to improve graft survival and risk of complication in solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). With immunosuppressive therapy, infections occur. Complex disease states, host factors, and concomitant therapies contribute to a "net state" of immunosuppression that must be considered and may confound perceived increased infection risks in patients receiving treatment.

Meta-Analysis of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonists as the Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Corticosteroid is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, but its response rate is only approximately 50%. At present, no uniformly accepted treatment for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) is available. Blocking interleukin-2 receptors (IL-2Rs) on donor T cells using pharmaceutical antagonists alleviates SR-aGVHD. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of four commercially available IL-2R antagonists (IL-2RAs) in SR-aGVHD treatment. A total of 31 studies met the following inclusion criteria (1): patients of any race, any sex, and all ages (2); those diagnosed with SR-aGVHD after HSCT; and (3) those using IL-2RA-based therapy as the treatment for SR-aGVHD. The overall response rate (ORR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.87)] and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.54 (95% CI: 0.39-0.68) and denileukin diftitox 0.56 (95% CI: 0.35-0.76). The complete response rate (CRR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42-0.68) and 0.42 (95%CI: 0.29-0.56), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16-0.51) and denileukin diftitox 0.37 (95% CI: 0.24-0.52). The ORR and CRR were better after 1-month treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab than after treatment with inolimomab and denileukin diftitox. The incidence of the infection was higher after inolimomab treatment than after treatment with the other IL-2RAs. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs varied. The response rate of basiliximab was the highest, followed by that of daclizumab. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia major: incidence, management, and outcome

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In the present prospective study, we aimed to investigate the incidence, management, and outcome of VOD/SOS in patients with thalassemia major (TM) who received allo-HSCT. VOD/SOS was diagnosed and classified based on the modified Seattle criteria. The prophylactic regimen for VOD/SOS was a combination treatment of dalteparin and lipo-PGE1. VOD/SOS was managed through an approach consisting of adequate supportive measures, short-term withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), and the use of methylprednisolone and basiliximab for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. VOD/SOS was found in 54 of 521 patients (10.4%) at a median time of 12 days after allo-HSCT. The cumulative incidence of all-grade and moderate VOD/SOS was 10.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Among the 54 VOD/SOS patients, no patient developed severe grade and died from VOD/SOS. Besides, the cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality on day 100 for patients with or without VOD/SOS was 0% vs. 4.0% (P = 0.187), respectively, and the 3-year overall survival rates were 94.3% vs. 93.2% (P = 0.707), respectively. Collectively, we concluded that appropriate symptomatic therapy and short-term withdrawal of CNIs safely mitigated the mortality of VOD/SOS in TM patients who underwent allo-HSCT.

Ruxolitinib in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A retrospective multicenter study of the pediatric group of SFGM-TC

BACKGROUND

We conducted a national multicenter retrospective study in France to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of ruxolitinib in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

PROCEDURE

Patients were recruited from the 15 pediatric transplantation centers. Transplanted patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: aged ≤ 18 years at transplantation, receiving a myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, having an aGVHD of grade ≥2, and treated with ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory aGVHD.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory aGVHD. Six patients achieved a complete response at day 28 after the start of treatment but finally 19 patients (65.5%) achieved a complete response (CR) with a median delay of 41 days (5-93 days). Two patients had a partial response. All patients who achieved CR or partial response discontinued corticosteroid treatment. Eight patients showed treatment failure. The overall response rate was 72.4%. Twenty-three of 29 patients were alive at a median follow-up of 685 days (177-1042 days) after the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Viral replication was observed in 41.4% of cases. We did not observe severe hematological adverse events and cytopenia requiring a modification of ruxolitinib doses always resolved. The median initial dose of ruxolitinib was 12.6 mg/m² /day with an important range. We could not demonstrate any relationship between initial dose and effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib may constitute a promising second-line treatment for children with steroid-refractory aGVHD that should be validated in a prospective large-scale pharmacokinetic and efficacy trial.

Prognostic factors and long-term follow-up of basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: Updated experience from a large-scale study

Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the most important causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), particularly for those with steroid-refractory (SR)-aGVHD. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors and long-term clinical outcomes of basiliximab treatment for SR-aGVHD. Basiliximab was administered on days 1, 3, and 8, and repeated weekly until aGVHD was less than grade II, or patients showed no response after four doses. Out of 1498 patients receiving allo-HSCT, 230 patients with SR-aGVHD were enrolled. Grade III to IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment significantly and independently predicted a poorer response to basiliximab in multivariate analysis. And, the cumulative incidence of overall response at 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days after treatment was 41.4% vs 23.1% (P = .023), 70.2% vs 43.6% (P = .002), and 80.1% vs 66.7% (P = .013), respectively. This was for those with grade II and grade III to IV aGVHD. Patients receiving more than four doses of basiliximab had higher rates of infections. The 4-year cumulative incidence of total and severe chronic GVHD after basiliximab treatment was 44.8% (95% CI 38.3%-51.3%) and 2.2% (95% CI 0.3%-4.1%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival after basiliximab treatment was 11.3% (95% CI 7.2%-15.4%), 30.0% (95% CI 24.1%-35.9%), 58.7% (95% CI 52.3%-65.1%), and 61.7% (95% CI 55.4%-68.0%), respectively. Comorbidities before allo-HSCT and refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score at diagnosis had significant influences on long-term survival. Thus, basiliximab was a safe and effective treatment for patients with SR-aGVHD.

Targeting Signal 3 Extracellularly and Intracellularly in Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) holds curative potential for many hematological disorders. However, the pathophysiology of the desired graft-versus-tumor effect is linked to life-threatening complications of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Allogeneic donor T lymphocytes are essential for causing GVHD, and their activation relies on the coordination of TCR engagement and co-stimulation, also known as Signal 1 and Signal 2. In addition to these signals, a network of secreted cytokines by immune cells provides a third signal, Signal 3, that is critical for the initiation and maintenance of GVHD. Strategies to target Signal 3 in human diseases have shown therapeutic benefit for inflammatory disorders such as Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. However, despite our growing understanding of their role in GVHD, the success of targeting individual cytokines has been modest with some notable exceptions. This review aims to describe current approaches toward targeting Signal 3 in clinical GVHD, and to highlight emerging studies in immune cell biology that may be harnessed for better clinical translation.

Treatment and unmet needs in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Systemic steroid therapy is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, although about half of patients will become refractory to treatment. As the number of patients undergoing alloHCT increases, developing safe and effective treatments for aGVHD will become increasingly important, especially for those whose disease becomes refractory to systemic steroid therapy. This paper reviews current treatment options for patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD and discusses data from recently published clinical studies to outline emerging therapeutic strategies.

The role of regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease management

Introduction: Despite improvements in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching algorithms and supportive care, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the leading cause of non-relapse morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Acute GVHD, typically occurring in the first 100 days post-HSCT, is mediated by mature effector T cells from the donor (graft) that become activated after encountering alloantigens in the recipient (host). Chronic GVHD, characterized by aberrant immune responses to both autoantigens and alloantigens, occurs later and arises from a failure to develop tolerance after HSCT. CD4+ CD25+ CD127- FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) function to suppress auto- and alloreactive immune responses and are key mediators of immune tolerance.Areas covered: In this review, authors discuss the biologic and therapeutic roles of Tregs in acute and chronic GVHD, including in vivo and ex vivo strategies for Treg expansion and adoptive Treg cellular therapy.Expert opinion: Although they comprise only a small subset of circulating CD4 + T cells, Tregs play an important role in establishing and maintaining immune tolerance following allogeneic HSCT. The development of GVHD has been associated with reduced Treg frequency or numbers. Consequently, the immunosuppressive properties of Tregs are being harnessed in clinical trials for GVHD prevention and treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of Basiliximab for the Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Minimal-Intensity Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Basiliximab is an immunosuppressive monoclonal antibody used for rejection prevention following solid organ transplantation; the pharmacokinetics (PK) of basiliximab in this setting are known. Basiliximab may also be used for prophylaxis and treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT); however, the PK of basiliximab in this setting are not known. Clinical transplant providers expect variation in the volume of distribution and clearance after nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation (NMAT) compared with solid organ transplantation. Blood loss, organ site-specific antibody accumulation, and differences in blood product use during the two transplantation approaches may generate differences in basiliximab PK. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe the PK of basiliximab after its addition to a minimally intense NMAT regimen, in conjunction with cyclosporine, for GVHD prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies.

DESIGN

Population PK analysis of a single-center, single-arm, phase II clinical trial.

SETTING

Academic cancer research center.

PATIENTS

Fourteen adults with hematologic malignancies (acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, myelofibrosis, or severe aplastic anemia) and undergoing NMAT with a fully HLA-matched (10 of 10 antigen matched) related or unrelated donor.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Basiliximab was used in conjunction with cyclosporine to deplete activated T cells in vivo as GVHD prophylaxis. We developed a novel competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method using recombinant interleukin-2 receptor alpha-chain (IL-2Ra) and a commercially available soluble sIL-2R ELISA kit to permit the quantification of serum basiliximab concentrations and characterization of the PK properties of the drug in this patient population. Using a nonlinear mixed effects model with NONMEM software, a one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the PK, as covariate analysis using stepwise covariate modeling did not improve the base model.

CONCLUSION

We suggest a one-compartment population model with first-order elimination to capture the PK profile for basiliximab for this patient population.

Basiliximab as Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Patients after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Basiliximab has been used successfully as a second-line treatment for steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in adult patients after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (haplo-HSCT) but has not been studied separately in the pediatric setting. We retrospectively reviewed 100 pediatric patients after haplo-HSCT receiving basiliximab for grades II (57%), III (27%), and IV (16%) SR aGVHD between January 2015 and December 2017. The median number of basiliximab doses was 4 (range, 2 to 9). The day 28 overall response rate was 85%, with complete response in 74% of patients, partial response in 11% of patients, and no response in 15% of patients. The day 28 overall response rates were 94.6% in skin SR aGVHD, 81.6% in gut SR aGVHD, and 66.7% in liver SR aGVHD. Infectious complications included bacterial infection (11%), presumed or documented fungal infections (7%), cytomegalovirus viremia (53%), Epstein-Barr virus viremia (11%), human herpesvirus-6 viremia (7%), and herpes simplex virus viremia (1%). The 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse rates between responders and nonresponders were 81.3% versus 46.7% (P < .001), 79.0% versus 46.7% (P = .001), 6.1% versus 33.3% (P < .001), and 14.9% versus 20.0% (P = .46), respectively. We conclude that basiliximab is an effective second-line agent for pediatric patients with SR aGVHD after haplo-HSCT, particularly for skin SR aGVHD.

Retrospective single center analysis of outcome, risk factors and therapy in steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Acute and chronic graft-vs.-host disease (aGvHD and cGvHD) are major complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. This retrospective single-center study analyzes incidence, therapy, and outcome of GvHD in n = 721 patients ≥18 years having received allogeneic HCT 2004-2013 with a special focus on steroid refractory GvHD. Acute (n = 355/49.2%) and chronic (n = 269/37.3%) GvHD were mainly treated by steroids in first-line therapy. The proportion of steroid refractory aGvHD and cGvHD was 35.7% and 31.4%, respectively. As there is no standard therapy for steroid refractory GvHD, a range of different agents was used. In aGvHD, the overall response rate (ORR) of steroid refractory GvHD to second-line treatment was 27.4%. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and mTOR inhibitors led to superior response rates (ORR 50.0% and 53.3%, respectively). In steroid refractory cGvHD therapy, ORR was 44.4%. Use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 11/45.5%), MMF (n = 18/50.0%), mTOR inhibitors (n = 10/60.0%), and extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP; n = 16/56.3%) showed ORR above average. Targeted therapies lead to responses in 7.7% (n = 13). This data may help to improve the design of future prospective clinical studies in GvHD.

Pentostatin therapy for steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease: identifying those who may benefit

We report outcomes of 60 patients with steroid-refractory (SR)-aGVHD treated with pentostatin. Almost half (47%) of patients had grade 4 GVHD-22% had stage 3-4 liver GVHD and 51% had stage 3-4 lower gastrointestinal tract (LGI) GVHD. Patients received a median of 3 courses (range, 1-9) of pentostatin. Day 28 overall response rate (ORR) was 33% (n = 20) (complete response 18% (n = 11), partial response 15% (n = 9)). Non-relapse mortality was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI) 61-84%) and overall survival (OS) was 21% (95% CI 12-32%) at 18 months. On univariate analysis, age >60 years (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01-3.7, p = 0.045) and presence of liver GVHD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-3.3, p = 0.03) were significant predictors of poor OS while patients with LGI GVHD had superior OS than those without (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8, p = 0.01). On stratified analysis, patients <60 years with isolated LGI GVHD had the best outcomes with an ORR of 48% and OS of 42% at 18 months. Among older patients, OS was 14% in those with isolated LGI aGVHD and 0% in others. Pentostatin remains a viable treatment option for SR-aGVHD, especially in patients 60 years or younger with isolated LGI involvement.

Graft Versus Host Disease After Liver Transplantation in Adults: A Case series, Review of Literature, and an Approach to Management

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) after liver transplantation (LT) is a deadly complication with very limited data on risk factors, diagnosis and management. We report a case series and a comprehensive review of the literature.

METHODS

Data were systematically extracted from reports of GVHD after LT, and from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Group comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-six adult patients with GVHD after LT have been reported. Median time to GVHD onset was 28 days. Clinical features were skin rash (92%), pancytopenia (78%), and diarrhea (65%). Six-month mortality with GVHD after LT was 73%. Sepsis was the most common cause of death (60%). Enterobacter bacteremia, invasive aspergillosis, and disseminated Candida infections were frequently reported. Recipient age over 50 years is a risk factor for GVHD after LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma was overrepresented, whereas chronic hepatitis C was underrepresented, in reported United States GVHD cases relative to all United Network for Organ Sharing database LT cases. Mortality rate with treatment of GVHD after LT was 84% with high-dose steroids alone, 75% to 100% with regimens using dose increases of calcineurin inhibitors, and 55% with IL-2 antagonists. Mortality was 25% in small case series using the CD2-blocker alefacept or TNF-α antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS

Age older than 50 years and hepatocellular carcinoma appear to be risk factors for GVHD. Hepatitis C may be protective. High-dose steroids and calcineurin inhibitors are ineffective in the treatment of GVHD after LT. CD2-blockers and TNF-α antagonists appear promising. We propose a diagnostic algorithm to assist clinicians in managing adults with GVHD after LT.

Acute and chronic Graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the main complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, affecting about 50% to 80% of the patients. Acute GVHD and its clinical manifestations are discussed in this article, as well as the new NIH criteria for the diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD. Therapy for both chronic and acute GVHD is an important field of discussion, as there is no proven superiority for the majority of therapies used after primary treatment has failed. Hence, this review is meant to be a useful consultation tool for hematologists dealing with this complex transplantation procedure complication.

Combining therapeutic antibodies using basiliximab and etanercept for severe steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A multi-center prospective study

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) remains a major problem after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Standard frontline therapy for aGVHD involves corticosteroids. However, fewer than half of patients have a lasting complete response. The long-term mortality rate of steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) remains around 70%. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal salvage treatment for SR-aGVHD. We performed the first prospective, multi-center clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel approach to treat severe (grades III-IV) SR-aGVHD with the combination of basiliximab and etanercept. Sixty-five patients with severe SR-aGVHD from six centers were included. The median number of basiliximab infusions was 4 (range 2-11) and of etanercept was 9 (range 2-12). At day 28 after starting the combination treatment, overall response (complete and partial response: CR+PR) to second-line treatment was 90.8% with 75.4% being CR. The incidences of CR per organ were 100%, 73.8%, and 79.7% for skin, liver, and gut involvement, respectively. Patients >30-y old (p = 0.043, RR = 3.169), development of grades III-IV liver aGVHD (p = 0.007, RR = 5.034) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (p = 0.035, RR = 4.02) were independent predictors for incomplete response. Combined treatment with basiliximab and etanercept resulted in improved CR to visceral aGVHD and significantly superior 2-y overall survival (54.7% vs. 14.8%, p <0.001) compared with classical salvage treatments. Our data suggest that the combination of basiliximab and etanercept may constitute a promising new treatment option for SR-aGVHD.

Treatment Options in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Objective:

To evaluate the treatment options in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Data Sources:

Literature was obtained by searching MEDLINE (1966–May 2007) and EMBASE (1980–May 2007).

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All pertinent clinical trials, retrospective studies, case reports, and compassionate use studies were identified and evaluated for safety and efficacy of the pharmacologic agents.

Data Synthesis:

Steroid-refractory acute GVHD is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Although various pharmacologic agents have been studied in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD, no treatments have been established as a salvage therapy. Preliminary data on different pharmacologic agents have been identified and evaluated for their efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD. The effects of the pharmacologic agents varied significantly among patients: severity of the disease, involvement of different organs, and the patient's age seem to be the major factors that affect an individual's response to drug therapy. In addition, the treatments are further challenged by the high incidence of potentially fatal opportunistic infections that occur during the therapy.

Conclusions:

Selection of pharmacologic agents for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD should be based on the target organs, adverse drug reactions, and economic factors. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to better understand the roles of these agents in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD.

T cell costimulation blockade for hyperacute steroid refractory graft versus-host disease in children undergoing haploidentical transplantation

The outcome of hyperacute grade 3-4 steroid-refractory graft-versus-host-disease (SR-GVHD) remains dismal despite a plethora of agents being tried alone or in combination. Following T replete haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide on 75 patients, 10 patients (13%) aged 2-20years, developed hyperacute SR-GVHD. We report on the outcome of two different regimens for treatment of SR-GVHD on the outcome of these patients. Five patients were treated in Regimen A consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin, Etanercept and Basiliximab. The next 5 patients were treated combining T cell costimulation blockade with Abatacept along with Etanercept and Basiliximab. The overall response at days 29 and 56 were 40% and 0% with Regimen A and100% and 40% with Regimen B. The major cause of treatment failure was progression of GVHD and opportunistic infections. Two of the patients achieving a complete remission on Regimen B are long term disease free survivors off immunosuppression. Our study demonstrates the dismal outcome of early onset SR-GVHD in children following T replete haploidentical transplantation. However, the combination of Abatacept with anticytokine agents seems to produce encouraging early response and might warrant further investigation.

A Prospective Study of Alemtuzumab as a Second-Line Agent for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric and Young Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We describe a single-center prospective study of alemtuzumab as a second-line agent for steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in pediatric and young adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Alemtuzumab was administered for grades II to IV aGVHD if patients did not improve within 5 days or worsened within 48 hours after corticosteroids. Interim analyses of alemtuzumab levels and response were performed after every 5 patients enrolled, resulting in 3 dosing cohorts, as follows: (1) .2 mg/kg alemtuzumab subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 (maximum of 31 mg over 5 days) and .2 mg/kg/dose (not exceeding 10 mg/dose) on days 15, 22, and 29; (2) .2 mg/kg alemtuzumab subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 (maximum of 43 mg over 5 days) and .2 mg/kg/dose on day 7, 10, 15, 22, and 29; and (3) .2 mg/kg subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 and .2 mg/kg/dose on day 7, 10, 15, and 22. Alemtuzumab levels were assessed before starting alemtuzumab and at days 1, 3, 6, 10, and 14 and weekly until day 99, where day 1 was the day of first alemtuzumab dose. Fifteen patients (median age, 10 years; range, 1.4 to 27) received alemtuzumab for grades II (6%), III (74%), and IV (20%) SR-aGVHD. The overall response rate was 67%, with complete response (CR) in 40%, partial response (PR) in 27%, and no response in 33%. The median day 6 alemtuzumab level was 2.79 µg/mL (interquartile range, 1.34 to 4.89) in patients with CR compared with .62 µg/mL (interquartile range, .25 to 1.45) in patients with PR + no response (P < .05). Ninety percent (n = 9) of patients with a CR or PR reduced corticosteroid doses within 8 weeks from first alemtuzumab dose. Side effects included fever (26%) and transient thrombocytopenia (53%). Asymptomatic viremias occurred in all patients but invasive viral disease occurred in 2 patients. One patient developed Epstein-Barr virus-post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Eighty percent (n = 12) of patients were alive at 6 months, of whom 53% (n = 8) were free of GVHD whereas 13% (n = 2) developed chronic GVHD. Alemtuzumab is an effective second-line agent for children and young adults with SR-aGVHD. Higher alemtuzumab levels are associated with CR. A real-time dose adjusted alemtuzumab study is needed to further optimize the dose of alemtuzumab in aGVHD.

Immunological effects in patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease following treatment with basiliximab, a CD25 monoclonal antibody

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a complication following an allogeneic stem cell transplantation with limited therapeutic options. Studies have shown a response in up to 80% of patients with this condition after treatment with the CD25 monoclonal antibody, basiliximab. Despite the good responses to treatment, around 50% of the patients experience recurrence of their GvHD symptoms 4-6 wk following cessation of therapy. The in vivo changes in the following treatment with this antibody have not been elucidated so far. We treated 14 patients with severe steroid-refractory GvHD with basiliximab weekly for 4 wk and monitored the changes in the T-, B-, NK- and dendritic cell subsets over this time period. The overall response to treatment was 92% (13/14) with 50% (7/14) achieving a complete response. Fifty four percentage (7/13) of the patients who responded showed recurrence of their GvHD symptoms. Contrary to expectations, our observations showed a significant depletion of the regulatory T-cell subset following treatment. Our findings suggest that the undesirable depletion of the regulatory T cells along with the CD25(+) acute inflammatory cells might be responsible for the high incidence of GvHD recurrence in this cohort of patients.

The use of basiliximab-infliximab combination for the treatment of severe gastrointestinal acute GvHD

After allogeneic stem cell transplant, severe grade III-IV gastrointestinal (GI) acute GvHD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and generally results in poor outcomes. Salvage therapy for patients who fail steroid therapy is not well defined in the literature. In the current retrospective study, we reviewed our experience with the combination of basiliximab and infliximab in 21 patients with severe, grade III-IV GI acute GvHD of whom 16 met the definition for steroid-refractory disease. The overall response rate was 76%, with 43% CR at a median time of 21 days after beginning treatment. The survival at 1 year was 24%, with most deaths due to complications from GvHD and recurrence of primary disease. All five of the long-term survivors have chronic GvHD. On the basis of a review of the literature, this regimen does not seem to be significantly more effective than other strategies for severe GI GvHD and seems to be worse than the results reported for basiliximab alone. Future studies of single-agent basiliximab and newer agents are required.

Alemtuzumab for severe steroid-refractory gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) still remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Moreover, patients who did not respond to first-line treatment with glucocorticosteroids have a very poor outcome. Some studies suggested that alemtuzumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody against the CD52 antigen) might be effective for treatment of refractory aGVHD. Here we report a single-center experience with alemtuzumab in refractory gastrointestinal aGVHD. From September 2009 to April 2012 at the Grenoble medical university center, 24 patients who had presented a refractory gastrointestinal aGVHD to corticosteroid, or after another immunosuppressive drug, were retrospectively analyzed. Most patients (n = 19) presented stage 4 gastrointestinal aGVHD. Response to treatment (either complete or partial) was observed in 15 patients (62.4%). The overall survival rate at 1 year for all patients was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.9% to 51.9%) and for responders, 53.3% (95% CI, 26.3% to 74.4%). Two patients died from infection, 5 patients from recurrent GVHD, and 1 from an uncontrolled post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

The successful use of alemtuzumab for treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients

SR-aGVHD remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic HCT recipients. Alemtuzumab has been used with success in adult patients but has not been studied in the pediatric setting. To estimate the effectiveness of alemtuzumab for the treatment of SR-aGVHD in pediatric patients, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 19 patients (median age 4 yr, range 0.5-28 years) with grades II (n = 3), III (n = 10), or IV (n = 6) SR-aGVHD who received alemtuzumab treatment. Patients received a median dose of 0.9 mg/kg alemtuzumab (range 0.3-2 mg/kg) divided over 2-6 days. Eighty-nine percent of patients received additional courses. A complete response, defined as GVHD of grade 0 at four wk following the first alemtuzumab course, was observed in nine patients (47%). A partial response, defined as an improvement in grade after four wk, was observed in five patients (26%). There was no response in five patients (26%). The overall response rate at four wk was 73%. Infectious complications included bacteremia (47%), presumed or documented fungal infections (21%), adenovirus viremia (52%), EBV viremia (36%), and CMV viremia (36%). We conclude that alemtuzumab is effective for SR-aGVHD in pediatric patients with a tolerable spectrum of complications.

Recent progress in managing graft-versus-host disease and viral infections following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Despite recent reductions in transplant-related mortality, post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remain major obstacles to the successful application of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Steroid-refractory GvHD has a poor outcome. Although there are a variety of new approaches to the treatment of refractory GvHD, many have limited evidence of efficacy. Other approaches appear to be unacceptably toxic. It would be preferable to improve GvHD prophylaxis. There is good evidence that rates of GvHD can be reduced without unacceptable reduction of the graft-versus-leukemia effect or compromising overall survival. However, prophylactic measures aimed at reducing T-cell numbers or functions are associated with high rates of reactivation of latent viruses. New technologies that allow rapid generation of virus-specific T-cells show promise to reduce the frequency and severity of such reactivations and have the potential to revolutionize the approach to post-transplant infectious complications.

Current practice in diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: results from a survey among German-Austrian-Swiss hematopoietic stem cell transplant centers

To assess current clinical practice in diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), we performed a survey among German, Austrian, and Swiss allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) centers. Thirty-four of 72 contacted centers (47%) completed both the diagnostic and therapeutic sections of the survey, representing 65% of allo-HSCT activity within the participating countries in 2011. Three pediatric centers answered as requested only the diagnostic part of the survey. In the presence of diarrhea and decreased oral intake after engraftment, only 4 centers (12%) do not perform any endoscopy before the start of immunosuppressive treatment. In case of a skin rash with the differential diagnosis of drug reaction, only 12 centers (35%) perform a skin biopsy up front, whereas 19 do so after failure of systemic steroids. In the presence of rapidly increasing cholestasis occurring without any other signs of aGVHD, 11 centers (32%) perform a liver biopsy up front and 14 only after failure of steroid treatment, whereas 9 centers do not perform a liver biopsy at all. Twenty centers (59%) use a percutaneous approach, 12 a transvenous approach, and 1 mini-laparoscopy for liver biopsies. First-line treatment of cutaneous aGVHD stage 1 consists of topical treatment alone in 17 of 31 responding centers (61%), whereas isolated cutaneous aGVHD stage III is treated with systemic steroids (prednisolone below 0.5 mg/kg/day n = 2, 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg/day n = 10, above 1.0 to 2.5 mg/kg/day n = 19) without or with topical agents (steroids n = 10; calcineurin inhibitors n = 3). In gastrointestinal manifestations of aGVHD, 9 centers (29%) add topical to systemic steroids, and 3 consider topical steroids as the only treatment for mild gastrointestinal and cutaneous aGVHD. The choice of agent for second-line treatment as well as the sequence of administration are extremely heterogeneous, most likely due to a lack of convincing data published. Most frequently used are mycophenolate mofetil (n = 14) and extracorporeal photopheresis (n = 10). Our survey also demonstrates that clinicians chose salvage therapies for steroid-refractory aGVHD based on their centers' own clinical experience.

Secondary treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a critical review

Management of steroid-resistant or steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) poses one of the most vexing and difficult problems faced by transplantation physicians. In the current study, we used 10 criteria to evaluate 67 reports describing secondary treatment of patients with aGVHD. The goal of this exercise was not only to provide a critical summary of the literature but also to offer suggestions that could improve future studies. Areas especially in need of improvement include the use of a consistent treatment regimen, the assessment of response at a consistent prespecified time point, consideration of concomitant treatment in assessing response, documentation that selection bias was minimized, and the use of methods that test a formal statistical hypothesis based on a contemporaneous or historical benchmark. Our results suggest that previous published reports collectively offer little guidance in discerning the most effective treatments for patients with steroid-resistant or steroid-refractory aGVHD. Adherence to the proposed criteria in future reports would enable meaningful comparisons across studies and thereby accelerate progress in evaluating new treatments for patients with aGVHD.

Basiliximab for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease after unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Anti-CD(25) monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) have been evaluated for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) mainly with matched donors for years, but there is little attention concerning patients with unmanipulated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched/haploidentical transplantations. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the chimeric Mab, basiliximab, to treat steroid-refractory acute GVHD after unmanipulated mismatched/haploidentical HSCT.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients who developed steroid-refractory acute GVHD between July 2005 and July 2009 were treated at our institute with basiliximab. No prisoners were used in this study.

RESULTS

Forty-six among 53 patients responded, including 37 complete remissions at a median response of 6 days from Mab initiation. There were 29 episodes of viral reactivations, 25 bacterial infections, and 11 probable fungal infections. Thirty-four out of 49 patients who could be evaluated developed chronic GVHD. Twenty-eight of 53 subjects (52.8%) were alive at a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 2-57) posttransplantation. The Kaplan-Meier probability of a 3-year event-free survival was 47.7%. The causes of death were infection alone (n = 15), progressive GVHD with infection (n = 3), relapse (n = 3), and other etiologies (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

These data suggested that basiliximab was effective to treat steroid-refractory acute GVHD after unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

Steroid-refractory acute GVHD: lack of long-term improved survival using new generation anticytokine treatment

There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In our center, the treatment policy has changed over time with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) being used from 1999 to 2003, and etanercept or inolimomab after 2004. An observational study compared survival and infection rates in all consecutive patients receiving 1 of these 3 treatments. Ninety-three patients were included. The main end point was overall survival (OS). Median age was 37 years. Acute GVHD developed at a median of 15 days after transplantation. Second-line treatment was initiated a median of 12 days after aGVHD diagnosis. Therapies were MMF in 56%, inolimomab in 22%, and etanercept in 23% of the patients. Overall, second-line treatment response rate was 45% (complete response: 28%), MMF: 55%, inolimomab: 35%, and etanercept: 28%. With 74 months median follow-up, the 2-year survival was 30% (95% confidence interval: 22-41). Risk factors significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis were disease status at transplantation; grade III-IV aGVHD at second-line treatment institution; and liver involvement. None of the second-line therapy influenced this poor outcome. Viral and fungal infections were not statistically different among the 3 treatment options; however, bacterial infections were more frequent in patients treated with anticytokines. Over an 11-year period, 3 treatment strategies, including 2 anticytokines, give similar results in patients with SR-aGVHD.

Treatment of graft-versus-host disease with monoclonal antibodies and related fusion proteins

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has evolved from an experimental treatment approach to a widely used, curative therapy to treat malignant and nonmalignant diseases of the hematopoietic system. Despite advances in donor selection, conditioning regimens and supportive care, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Steroids are the standard first-line treatment and are able to control GvHD in approximately 50% of patients. Those who fail on steroids have a poor long-term prognosis. Therefore, a large number of drugs and procedures have been evaluated as second-line therapy. Monoclonal antibodies have increasingly been used to treat malignancy and autoimmune disease during the last 20 years. Their unique ability to target specific antigens theoretically enables them to directly interfere with cellular mechanisms that are involved in GvHD pathology. For this reason, monoclonal antibodies have been studied extensively as a second-line treatment for acute and chronic GvHD. The purpose of this article is to collect published data on clinical trials from the current literature and to give an overview on efficacy and toxicity of monoclonal antibody treatment for GvHD.

Current and future approaches for control of graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), both acute and chronic, remains one of the major barriers to improving outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The pathophysiology of GVHD is complex and incompletely understood. GVHD is believed to arise from the interaction of: tissue damage and proinflammatory cytokines causing activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs, donor T-cell activation by APCs and cytokines and host tissue injury by effector T lymphocytes and proinflammatory cytokines. There is also a role for additional lymphocyte subtypes (naive and memory T cells, regulatory T cells, natural killer T cells and B cells) in GVHD pathogenesis. Strategies to improve donor-recipient HLA match, and to minimize conditioning toxicity, cytokine release and APC and effector T-lymphocyte activation, will likely improve prophylaxis of acute (and possibly chronic) GVHD. Therapy of established acute and chronic GVHD is still heavily dependent on corticosteroids, despite their limited efficacy and considerable toxicity. Novel agents (and/or combinations of agents) comprising pharmacologic, biologic and cellular therapies targeting specific steps or subsets involved in immune activation will likely comprise future advances in GVHD control. This article reviews the current state of knowledge regarding the prevention and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD. Novel approaches currently undergoing evaluation are also highlighted.

The use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Steroids along with calcineurin inhibitors remain the standard initial therapy, however, less than half of the patients completely respond and there is no uniformly accepted therapy for patients with steroid-resistant GVHD.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the current role and ongoing development of mAbs in the treatment of GVHD. Various mAbs to cell surface antigens on GVHD effector cells have been investigated for the treatment of acute GVHD: these include anti-TNF-α antibodies, IL-2 receptor antagonists, anti-CD3 and anti-CD52 mAbs, while anti-CD20 mAb has been extensively investigated in the setting of chronic GVHD. Overall, response rates have been reported to be greater than 60%, although it should be emphasized that the long-term survival still remains suboptimal, mainly due to the detrimental side effects of infectious complications, progressive GVHD and relapse of underlying malignancy.

EXPERT OPINION

Future challenges will include more appropriate definition of these agents in the therapeutic scenario of GVHD. Combinations of mAbs or mAb combined with newer immunosuppressive drugs might potentially achieve greater success, especially if used early in the disease process.

Pentostatin for treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD: a retrospective single-center analysis

Acute GVHD (aGVHD) remains a major cause of mortality in patients undergoing allo-SCT. In particular, the outcome of those patients who fail first-line therapy with glucocorticosteroids is poor. Preliminary reports suggested that the purine analogue pentostatin might be effective for treatment of steroid-refractory aGVHD. Here, we report on our single-center experience with pentostatin in this condition. From 2005 to 2008, a total of 24 consecutive patients, who had undergone first-line salvage treatment for steroid-refractory aGVHD of the gastrointestinal tract with pentostatin, were identified from 301 patients allografted during that period and retrospectively analyzed. Response to treatment, defined as CR or very good PR (VGPR), was observed in nine patients (38%), with a median time to response of 10 days. Although pentostatin was associated with only moderate myelosuppressive toxicity, if any, 2-year survival was only 17% with five of the nine responders dying from infection (four patients) or recurrent GVHD (one patient). We conclude that pentostatin is a moderately effective therapy for steroid-refractory aGVHD, showing response and outcome rates similar to other clinically used regimens.

Rapamycin for refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Rapamycin, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, is a potent immunosuppressive drug that also displays antineoplastic properties and expands regulatory T cells. Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a significant cause of mortality after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation and therapeutic options are not codified. We retrospectively evaluated the role of rapamycin in this setting.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, 22 patients were identified, from October 2004 to February 2008, as having received rapamycin for acute GVHD refractory to one or more lines of treatment. We analyzed the efficacy and tolerance of rapamycin and the outcome of these 22 patients in this setting.

RESULTS

Rapamycin resulted in a rapid and sustained complete remission of GVHD in 72% of heavily pretreated patients. Cytopenias were frequent but did not require treatment interruption. Thrombotic microangiopathy developed in 36% of patients when rapamycin was associated with calcineurin inhibitors and frequently resolved after interruption of one or both drugs. At a median follow-up of 13 months, overall survival was 41%. Previous treatment with high-dose steroid pulses was associated with a worse outcome (survival 12% vs. 69%). The major cause of death was infectious complications (77%).

CONCLUSION

Despite a small and heterogeneous population of patients, these results are encouraging and provide a rationale for prospective studies that use rapamycin in steroid-refractory acute GVHD as a second- or third-line agent.