Elderly age and prior autologous transplantation have a deleterious effect on survival following allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning: results from the Spanish multicenter prospective trial

Allogeneic stem cell transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and karnofsky performance status score less than or equal to 80%: A study from the acute leukemia working party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Limited data are currently available on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with a reduced performance status. We herein present the results of a registry study on 2,936 AML patients undergoing allo-SCT in first remission (CR1) with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score less than or equal to 80%. Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates were 54%, 59%, and 41%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with a KPS score = 80% had lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and superior OS in comparison to patients with a KPS score <80% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a KPS score =80%, a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen was associated with an increased risk of relapse (p = 0.002) and lower GRFS (p < 0.001) compared to myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Differently, in patients with a KPS score <80%, a RIC regimen resulted in lower NRM (p < 0.001), whereas relapse incidence did not differ, thus leading to an improved GRFS (p = 0.008) as compared to MAC. A transplant from a matched sibling donor (MSD) was associated with a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (p < 0.01) and NRM (p < 0.01) in comparison to other donor types. In conclusion, allo-SCT appears feasible in AML patients with a jeopardized KPS score. Survival is significantly affected by the conditioning intensity, which should be adjusted according to the severity of KPS impairment.

Outcome following second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may be indicated following relapse or graft failure following first HCT. Our retrospective single-center study sought to investigate parameters that influence post-second allogeneic HCT survival.

METHOD

We investigated 92 patients who underwent second allogeneic HCT between 1980 and 2016 for relapse or graft failure following first HCT. Median age at second HCT was 41 years (range 16-68), performed for relapse in 59 patients (64%) and for graft failure in 33 patients (36%).

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, 3-year OS of the entire cohort was 35% (95% CI=25-45). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (3-year OS 48% for ECOG 0-1, 18% for ECOG 2-3, P=.0006), second HCT indication (3-year OS 43% for relapse, 20% for graft failure, P=.02), time from first HCT to relapse/graft failure (3-year OS for <12months 21%, for ≥12months 46%, P=.009), and conditioning intensity (3-year OS for MA 42% vs other regimens 23%, P=.08) significantly influenced OS. Multivariable analysis confirmed ECOG score (HR=2.15 for ECOG 2-3, 95% CI=1.32-3.51, P=.002) and second HCT indication (HR=1.67 for graft failure, 95% CI=1.02-2.75, P=.04) to independently influence survival.

CONCLUSION

Second HCT may offer long-term survival particularly to patients with good performance status who relapse post-first HCT.

Patient selection for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT): the evolution of HCT risk assessment

The use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is expanding, with disproportionate growth witnessed in older adults with hematologic malignancies. As the chronological age barrier to transplant fades, refining the pre-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) risk assessment to better capture host health status and disease characteristics is essential. This review summarizes recent efforts to move the field forward towards achieving this goal. Many of these risk assessment tools are currently included in prospective clinical trials; routine clinical use requires greater understanding of how to best incorporate this new information into HCT decision making.

Comorbidity-age index: a clinical measure of biologic age before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

PURPOSE

Age has long been used as a major factor for assessing suitability for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was developed as a measure of health status to predict mortality risk after HCT. Whether age, comorbidities, or both should guide decision making for HCT is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 3,033 consecutive recipients of HLA-matched grafts from five institutions contributed to this analysis. Patients were randomly divided into a training set to develop weights for age intervals and a validation set to assess the performance of prognostic models.

RESULTS

In the training set, patients age 20 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, and ≥ 60 years had hazard ratios for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of 1.21 (P = .29), 1.48 (P = .04), 1.75 (P = .004), and 1.84 (P = .005), respectively, compared with those age younger than 20 years. Consequently, age ≥ 40 years was assigned a weight of 1 to be added to the HCT-CI to constitute a composite comorbidity/age index. In the validation set, the composite comorbidity/age score had statistically significantly higher c-statistic estimates for prediction of NRM (0.664 v 0.556; P < .001) and survival (0.682 v 0.560; P < .001) compared with age, respectively. Patients with comorbidity/age scores of 0 to 2 had comparable mortality risks regardless of conditioning regimens. Patients with scores of 3 to 4 and ≥ 5 had statistically significant higher mortality risks after high-dose versus nonmyeloablative regimens.

CONCLUSION

Age is a poor prognostic factor. The proposed composite measure allows integration of both comorbidities and age into clinical decision making and comparative-effectiveness research of HCT.

Pretransplant comorbidities maintain their impact on allogeneic stem cell transplantation outcome 5 years posttransplant: a retrospective study in a single german institution

The introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has allowed elderly patients with preexisting comorbidities access to the potentially curative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Patient's comorbidities at the time of treatment consideration play a significant role in transplant outcome in terms of both overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) quantifies these patient specific risks and has established itself as a major tool in the pretransplant assessment of patients. Many single center and multicenter studies have assessed the HCT-CI score and reported conflicting outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the HCT-CI in a single large European transplant centre. 245 patients were retrospectively analyzed and the predictive value of the score was assessed with respect to OS and NRM. We confirm that the HCT-CI predicts outcome for both OS and NRM. Moreover, we identified age of the patient as an independent prognostic parameter for OS. Incorporation of age in the HCT-CI would improve its ability to prognosticate and allow the transplant physician to assess the patient specific risks appropriately at the time of counseling for transplant.

Survival of hematological patients after discharge from the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study

Introduction

Although the survival rates of hematological patients admitted to the ICU are improving, little is known about the long-term outcome. Our objective was to identify factors related to long-term outcome in hematological patients after ICU discharge.

Methods

A prospective, observational study was carried out in seven centers in Spain. From an initial sample of 161 hematological patients admitted to one of the participating ICUs during the study period, 62 were discharged alive and followed for a median time of 23 (1 to 54) months. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the factors related to long term-survival. Finally, variables that influence the continuation of the scheduled therapy for the hematological disease were studied.

Results

Mortality after ICU discharge was 61%, with a median survival of 18 (1 to 54) months. In the multivariate analysis, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (ECOG) >2 at ICU discharge (Hazard ratio 11.15 (4.626 to 26.872)), relapse of the hematological disease (Hazard ratio 9.738 (3.804 to 24.93)) and discontinuation of the planned treatment for the hematological disease (Hazard ratio 4.349 (1.286 to 14.705)) were independently related to mortality. Absence of stem cell transplantation, high ECOG and high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores decreased the probability of receiving the planned therapy for the hematological malignancy.

Conclusions

Both ICU care and post-ICU management determine the long-term outcome of hematological patients who are discharged alive from the ICU.

Older patients/older donors: choosing wisely

Two lingering problems regarding transplantation in older adults have been how to select patients appropriately and whether to use older sibling donors. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) of older patients may result in long-term survival due to GVL, but the data remain observational and mostly restricted to those 50 to 69 years of age. Patients with excellent performance status and low comorbidity have the best long-term survival after HCT. Novel measures of health status such as self-report or performance-based functional measures allow “staging the age” and may inform candidacy for less robust patients. Older matched sibling donors should be preferred over matched unrelated donors (MUDs) because outcomes are equivalent to superior for matched sibling donors compared with MUD. However, MUDs also achieve acceptable outcomes and long-term disease control. An alternative donor can be considered based on institutional protocols and expertise. Very limited information is available in patients or related donors 70 years of age and older. Future efforts to more completely characterize patient health status before transplantation will allow better application of HCT in older adults.

Risk assessment before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) most commonly affects patients older than 60 years. Outcomes of treatment of older AML patients have been poor. The advent of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens made allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) an available treatment option with curative intent for older AML patients. Because older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, little is known about the stratification of their risks before allogeneic HCT. While recent studies of RIC and allogeneic HCT have shown little impact of age on outcomes, other variables such as the recipient health status and the AML disease status and chromosomal aberrations have proven to be of prognostic significance. Here, the authors review recent studies of allogeneic HCT for older patients with AML with detailed evaluation of risk factors for relapse as well as non-relapse mortality. The authors have integrated the currently available information on transplant risks into a five-category risk-benefit system that could aid in the decision-making in this patient population.

Older patients/older donors: choosing wisely

Two lingering problems regarding transplantation in older adults have been how to select patients appropriately and whether to use older sibling donors. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) of older patients may result in long-term survival due to GVL, but the data remain observational and mostly restricted to those 50 to 69 years of age. Patients with excellent performance status and low comorbidity have the best long-term survival after HCT. Novel measures of health status such as self-report or performance-based functional measures allow "staging the age" and may inform candidacy for less robust patients. Older matched sibling donors should be preferred over matched unrelated donors (MUDs) because outcomes are equivalent to superior for matched sibling donors compared with MUD. However, MUDs also achieve acceptable outcomes and long-term disease control. An alternative donor can be considered based on institutional protocols and expertise. Very limited information is available in patients or related donors 70 years of age and older. Future efforts to more completely characterize patient health status before transplantation will allow better application of HCT in older adults.

MTX or mycophenolate mofetil with CsA as GVHD prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning PBSCT from HLA-identical siblings

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with CsA seems to lead to earlier post transplant hematological recovery and less mucositis than MTX, with a similar incidence of GVHD. In this study we analyzed the post transplant outcomes of two cohorts of patients who underwent an HLA-identical sibling reduced intensity conditioning transplantation (allo-RIC) with GVHD prophylaxis consisting of CsA in combination with either MMF or a short course of MTX. We included 145 consecutive allo-RIC transplants performed between April 2000 and August 2007. The median follow-up for survivors was 41 months (4-105 months). The study group included 91 males. Median age was 55 years (range 18-71 years). Diagnoses included myeloid (n=65) and lymphoid (n=80) malignancies. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of CsA/MMF in 52 and CsA/MTX in 93 patients. The conditioning regimen was based on fludarabine in combination with BU (n=59) or melphalan (n=86). The occurrence of grade 2-4 mucositis was higher in the CsA/MTX group than in the CsA/MMF group (57 vs 23%, P=0.001). The cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was similar, 48 vs 50% and 71 vs 68%, respectively (P>0.7). The 2-year relapse and OS were similar in the CsA/MTX and CsA/MMF groups (29 vs 21%, P=0.3 and 52 vs 51%, P=0.7, respectively). Our results support further prospective studies comparing the use of the CsA/MMF combination with CsA/MTX as GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-identical sibling donor allo-RIC recipients.

Prognostic factor and quality of life analysis in 160 patients aged > or =60 years with hematologic neoplasias treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Toxicity-reduced conditioning is a curative treatment option for medically compromised or elderly patients ineligible for myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The aim of this study was to detect prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and to evaluate quality of life (QOL) in a large homogeneous cohort of 160 consecutive patients aged > or =60 years treated with allogeneic HCT. We evaluated age, sex, performance status, comorbidities, pulmonary function, lactic dehydrogenase concentration, type of donor, disease status, CD34(+) cells transplanted, cytomegalovirus status, time from diagnosis to HCT, and the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). All patients who survived for > or =6 months (n = 79) were asked to complete a QOL survey. All patients (median age, 64.7 years; range, 60.1-76 years) received pretransplantation conditioning with fludarabine, BCNU, and melphalan. With a median follow-up of 35 months, the 1-year OS was 62.4% and 3-year OS was 47.4%. Multivariate analysis revealed compromised performance status as the most significant negative prognostic parameter for OS (P < .003), whereas male donor (P = .008) and chronic GVHD (P = .024) were associated with better OS. The 89% of survivors who returned the QOL questionnaire rated their global QOL as good-to-excellent despite impaired functional capabilities and such symptoms as fatigue, dyspnea, and loss of appetite. The main prognostic factor was performance status, not age. Our data suggest that toxicity-reduced conditioning offers a chance for enhanced OS with an adequate QOL.

Graft-versus-disease effect following allogeneic transplantation for acute leukaemia

The graft-versus-leukaemia effect is one of the most important biological effects to influence outcome in patients with acute leukaemia. The recognition of this modality over the past three decades has led to far-reaching changes in the concept and conduct of allogeneic transplantation in acute myeloid leukaemia, and in the infusion of donor lymphocytes as a therapeutic modality. Despite these conceptual advances, there is a considerable need for more structured prospective studies to optimally define the role of reduced-intensity transplantation in both acute myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy with a peak incidence over the age of 55 years. AML of older patients is less curable with conventional chemotherapy, and, when it relapses, is almost uniformly fatal. Novel treatments hold the promise of improving the results of therapy, but have failed so far to show dramatic change in the prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation using traditional myeloablative preparative regimens is not easily tolerated by the elderly and/or frailer patient, and may lead to prohibitive treatment-related mortality rates. Most patients treated in the past were younger and devoid of comorbid clinical conditions. Novel reduced-intensity regimens made allogeneic transplants applicable to the elderly, providing the benefit of the graft-versus-leukemia effect to a larger number of patients in need. Here we review the indications for allogeneic transplants in AML and discuss reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index and Karnofsky performance status are independent predictors of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Elderly and medically infirm cancer patients are increasingly offered allogeneic nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A better understanding of the impact of health status on HCT outcomes is warranted. Herein, a recently developed HCT-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was compared with a widely acceptable measure of health status, the Karnofsky performance status (KPS).

METHODS

The outcomes of 341 patients were evaluated, conditioned for either related or unrelated HCT by 2-gray (Gy) total body irradiation given alone or combined with fludarabine at a dose of 90 mg/m(2). Comorbidities were assessed retrospectively by the HCT-CI. Performance status before and toxicities after HCT were graded prospectively using the KPS and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

Weak Spearman rank correlations were noted between HCT-CI and KPS and between the 2 measures and age, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, and intervals between diagnosis and HCT (all r < 0.20). High-risk diseases correlated significantly with higher mean HCT-CI scores (P = .009) but not low KPS (P = .37). In multivariate models, the HCT-CI had significantly greater independent predictive power for toxicities (P = .004), nonrelapse mortality (P = .0002), and overall mortality (P = .0002) compared with the KPS (P = .05, .13, and .05, respectively). Using consolidated HCT-CI and KPS scores, patients were stratified into 4 risk groups with 2-year survivals of 68%, 58%, 41%, and 32%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HCT-CI and KPS should be assessed simultaneously before HCT. The use of both tools combined likely refines risk-stratification for HCT outcomes. Novel guidelines for assessment of performance status among HCT patients are warranted.

A prognostic score for patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has the potential to cure patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but a number of prognostic factors can influence the outcome of transplantation. At present, no transplantation-specific risk score exists for this patient population. We propose a simple scoring system for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or MDS, based on a retrospective analysis of 445 patients undergoing SCT at our institution (divided into training and validation subsets). The score depends on 5 variables: age, disease, stage at transplantation, cytogenetics, and pretransplantation ferritin. It divides patients into 3 groups of comparable size, with 5-year overall survival (OS) of 56% (low risk), 22% (intermediate risk), and 5% (high risk). This prognostic score could be useful in making treatment decisions for individual patients, in stratifying patients entering clinical trials, and in adjusting transplantation outcomes across centers under the new federal reporting rules.

Sustained remissions of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation: chronic graft-versus-host disease is the strongest factor improving survival

PURPOSE

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) reduces nonrelapse mortality (NRM). This reduction makes it possible for patients who are ineligible for high-dose myeloablative conditioning allo-SCT to benefit from graft-versus-leukemia reaction. In this multicenter, prospective study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we investigated the efficacy of RIC allo-SCT from a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling by using a regimen that uses fludarabine and busulfan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-three patients with AML (n = 59) and MDS (n = 34) were included, and the median age was of 53 years. Follow-up for survivors was 43 months (range, 3 to 89 months). The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (150 mg/m(2)) and oral busulfan (8 to 10 mg/kg). All except one patient received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyslosporine and methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil.

RESULTS

The 100-day, 1-year, and 4-year incidences of NRM were 8, 16%, and 21%, respectively. The 1- and 4-year relapse cumulative incidences were 23% and 37%, respectively, and leukemia recurrence was the main cause of death. The 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 43% and 45%, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 53% (45% extensive), and its development was the major factor associated with lower relapse incidence and improved DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the capacity of this RIC regimen to obtain long-term remissions in patients ineligible for a conventional allo-SCT. The results suggest an important role of the development of chronic GVHD in reducing relapse and improving DFS and OS.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the elderly

The development of reduced intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning (NST) in preparation for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) revolutionized the field and led to reconsideration of the dogma of upper age limit that was set up by the transplant centers as an eligibility parameter. Analysis of the literature data showed that NST regimens are associated with decreased transplant related mortality, and graft-versus-host disease, in comparison with standard myeloablative conditioning, in patients above the age of 50-55 years, or in younger patients with significant comorbidities. However we have to mention, that our considerations are based on the retrospective analysis of the literature data, and that well controlled prospective randomized studies are needed in order to definitely assess the role of NST. Comorbidity indices might be proved as the most important parameters for the choice of the most proper regimen for each patient in need and should be included in future trials.

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation is an effective therapy for refractory or relapsed hodgkin lymphoma: results of a spanish prospective cooperative protocol

We report the results of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-RIC) in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Forty patients with relapsed or refractory HL were homogeneously treated with an RIC protocol (fludarabine 150 mg/m(2) intravenously plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) intravenously) and cyclosporin A and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Twenty-one patients (53%) had received >2 lines of chemotherapy, 23 patients (58%) had received radiotherapy, and 29 patients (73%) had experienced treatment failure with a previous autologous stem cell transplantation. Twenty patients (50%) were allografted in resistant relapse, and 38 patients received hematopoietic cells from an HLA-identical sibling. Five patients (12%) died from early transplant-related mortality (before day +100 after allo-RIC). One-year transplant-related mortality was 25%. Acute GVHD developed in 18 patients (45%). Chronic GVHD developed in 17 (45%) of the 31 evaluable patients. The response rate 3 months after the allo-RIC was 67% (21 [52%] complete remissions and 6 [15%] partial remissions). Eleven patients received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) for disease relapse. The response rate after DLI was 54% (3 complete remissions and 3 partial remissions). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 48% +/- 10% and 32% +/- 10% at 2 years, respectively. Refractoriness to chemotherapy was the only adverse prognostic factor for both OS (63% +/- 12% versus 35% +/- 13%; P = .05) and PFS (55% +/- 16% versus 10% +/- 9%; P = .006). For patients with failure of a prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, results were especially good for those who experienced late relapses (>/=12 months: 2-year OS and PFS were 75% +/- 16% and 70% +/- 18%, respectively). These data suggest that allo-RIC is feasible in heavily pretreated HL patients and has an acceptable early transplant-related mortality. Results are better in patients allografted in sensitive disease. Both responses observed after the development of GVHD and DLI may suggest a graft-versus-HL effect. Allo-RIC has to be considered an effective therapeutic approach for patients who have had treatment failure with a previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Performance status and comorbidity predict transplant-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Comorbidity measurements have recently been used to improve estimation of tolerance to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We sought to determine the independent effect of comorbidity and performance status on HCT outcome and to devise a simple risk classification system for transplant-related mortality. We analyzed 105 consecutively enrolled patients who underwent HCT and received reduced intensity conditioning with fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab. Comorbid conditions were tabulated using 2 scales, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Kaplan-Feinstein Scale (KFS). Comorbid conditions were found in 47% of patients by the KFS and in 27% by the CCI (P < .001). Using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (PS) scale, 34% had a PS score >0 (range, 0-2). A simple scale combining the KFS and PS enabled separation of high- from low-risk patients, with 6-month cumulative incidences 50% and 15%, respectively for transplant-related mortality (P = .001) and enhanced prognostic power over the CCI alone (P = .018). Prospective studies evaluating more comprehensive functional and comorbidity measurements are warranted.

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) haematopoietic cell transplants in elderly patients with AML

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) transplants were first developed almost a decade ago to reduce the transplant-related mortality (TRM) of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and to make the graft-versus-leukaemia effect accessible to patients otherwise ineligible for HCT. Acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) in elderly patients is now a frequent indication for RIC-HCT. The major reasons for these rapid developments have been on the one hand the high median age of patients with AML coupled with the unsatisfactory results with conventional chemotherapy, and on the other hand with the promising results already reported for RIC-HCT. Using RIC-HCT, overall survival rates at 2 years of 45-50% have been observed in patients with AML. This compares favourably with overall survival rates of 10-15% under chemotherapy in AML CR1, or no long-term survivors in patients >CR2. From the available data we conclude that RIC-HCT is a promising treatment for elderly patients with AML. However, phase-III studies with unrelated donors will have to be done in order to formally prove its superiority in comparison to conventional chemotherapy.

Reduced-intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia: is this strategy correct

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is based on the strategy of attaining donor cell engraftment with immunosuppressive agents. This approach, which relies predominantly on donor effector cells for anti-leukemic or graft-versus-leukemia effect, is being used with increased frequency. Treatment-related mortality appears less with RIC than that observed with conventional myeloablative regimens. Available data support the fact that a myeloablative regimen is not required for successful engraftment and some patients appear to be cured of their disease. Despite the plethora of clinical reports, however, no prospective studies have been conducted that establish this procedure as the preferred option in AML. On the other hand, patients formerly excluded from a myeloablative procedure such as the 'elderly' and those with significant comorbid conditions, often may be RIC transplant candidates. By using prospective controlled clinical trials, we will determine whether these encouraging RIC data are applicable to a nonselect population of AML. The transplant community now is poised to design and complete investigations to ascertain the true role of RIC in the treatment of AML.

Fludarabine phosphate and melphalan: a reduced intensity conditioning regimen suitable for allogeneic transplantation that maintains the graft versus malignancy effect

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic stem cell transplantation allows stable donor cell engraftment with the maintenance of a graft versus malignancy effect. Many different regimens exist employing various combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and T-cell depletion. We examined the role of non-T-cell depleted RIC regimens in 56 patients with haematological malignancies. Patients received fludarabine phosphate for 5 days (30 mg/m2 in 35 patients, 25 mg/m2 in 21 patients) and melphalan for 1 day (140 mg/m2 in 36 patients, 100 mg/m2 in 20 patients). Immunosuppression was with CyA alone in 33 patients and CyA/MTX in 23 patients. Twenty-four of the 26 patients with chimerism data showed >95% donor chimerism at 3 months post transplant. aGVHD occurred in 18% of patients receiving CyA/MTX compared to 53% of patients receiving CyA. The 100-day mortality rate was 0.16 (95%CI 0.08-0.28) and 1-year nonrelapse mortality was 0.24 (95%CI 0.13-0.38). Thirty-three patients remained alive and in CR at a median of 19 months post transplant (range 3-38 months). We have shown that patients transplanted with fludarabine phosphate, melphalan 100 mg/m2 and with CyA/MTX as post transplant immunosuppression can achieve good disease control with an acceptable level of toxicity. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome following myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) among patients older than 50 yr of age. A total of 215 patients with a median age of 57 yr underwent allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for early (41%) or advanced (59%) hematologic malignancies. After a median follow-up of 36 months a 10-yr survival estimate of 56 +/- 6% could be assessed for patients in early disease stages while patients with advanced diseases showed a significantly decreased survival probability of 31 +/- 5% (p < 0.0002). Transplant related mortality (TRM) at day 100 and 365 post-transplant was 13% and 30% for early but increased to 21% and 49% for advanced disease stages. As major determinants of TRM advanced disease stage (p < 0.0001) and occurrence of grades II-IV graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) (p < 0.0001) were identified. These results show that hematopoietic SCT following myeloablative conditioning is also applicable to elderly patients whereas disease stage and high-grade GVHD represent the essential prognostic factors for outcome.

Comparison between reduced intensity and conventional myeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies aged between 50 and 59 years

To evaluate the efficacy of reduced-intensity stem-cell transplantation (RIST), we retrospectively compared outcomes of 207 consecutive Japanese patients aged between 50 and 59 years with hematologic malignancies who received RIST (n=70) and conventional stem-cell transplantation (CST) (n=137). CST recipients received total body irradiation (TBI)-based or busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens. RIST regimens were purine analog-based (n=67), 2 Gy TBI-based (n=2), and others (n=1). Most CST recipients (129/137) received calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate as graft-versus-host (GVHD) prophylaxis, while 32 RIST recipients received cyclosporin. In all, 23 CST and five RIST recipients died without disease progression within 100 days of transplant. Grade II to IV acute GVHD occurred in 56 CST and 38 RIST recipients. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival between CST and RIST. On multivariate analysis on OS, five variables were significant: preparative regimens (CST vs RIST) (hazard ratio=1.92, 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.97; P=0.003), performance status (2-4 vs 0-1) (2.50, 1.51-4.16; P<0.001), risk of underlying diseases (1.85, 1.21-2.83; P=0.004), acute GVHD (2.57, 1.72-3.84; P<0.001), and CML (0.38, 0.21-0.69; P=0.002). We should be careful in interpreting results of this small-sized retrospective study; however, reduced regimen-related toxicity might contribute to better survival in RIST. The low relapse rates following RIST suggest a strong antitumor activity through allogeneic immunity.

Myeloablative conditioning is well tolerated by older patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts

Older age has been linked to increased transplant-related mortality from graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Depletion of T cells from stem cell grafts seems to protect from complications of GvHD particularly in older patients. After myeloablative conditioning, patients with haematological malignancies received allogeneic grafts from HLA identical siblings. For GvHD prophylaxis, PBPC grafts were treated ex vivo with anti-CD52, and therapeutic doses of cyclosporin until day +90. Survival of patients younger or older than the population age median was analysed. In all, 62 consecutive patients with a median age of 42.5 years were studied. Death was procedure related in 17% and from relapse of malignancy in five. At a median, follow-up is 662 (7-2316) days, 74% survive disease free. The rate of haematopoietic recovery and treatment-related mortality was similar in both groups. A total of 73% of 30 individuals in the younger group and 75% (P=0.8) in the older cohort survive at a median follow-up of 444 and 806 days (P=0.4). GvHD occurred in 13% and was the only adverse factor for survival (P<0.04). Myeloablative conditioning is well tolerated up to the age of 59 in patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts. This information is useful to more precisely select patients who would benefit most from reduced intensity conditioning schedules.

Effect of age and previous autologous transplantation on nonrelapse mortality and survival in patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning and allografting for advanced hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE

Older age and a previously failed autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT) are poor prognostic factors for patients receiving myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic SCT. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens achieved a significant reduction of treatment-related mortality, but the influence of previously described risk factors on the outcome of this novel transplantation strategy have not been fully analyzed yet.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty patients with advanced hematologic malignancies received a RIC regimen containing thiotepa (10 mg/kg), fludarabine (60 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg), followed by an allogeneic transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to age; 90 patients were younger than 55 years, and 60 patients were 55 years old or older. The other pretransplantation characteristics were fairly balanced.

RESULTS

Actuarial 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was not statistically different between the groups (13% in the younger group and 19% in the older group). By univariate and multivariate analysis, NRM was significantly higher in older patients who previously experienced failure with an autograft. The occurrence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or extensive chronic GVHD was associated with a higher NRM in both age cohorts. Overall survival (OS) was not statistically different between the younger (66%) and older groups (61%). By multivariate analysis, refractory disease was associated with a worse OS irrespective of age group.

CONCLUSION

RIC transplantations show a rather low NRM, and age > or = 55 years per se cannot be considered a risk factor anymore. The timing of transplantation and novel strategies for the prevention of severe GVHD could further improve patient outcome.

Nonmyeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients 60 Years or Older

We analyzed the outcomes of 24 consecutive patients aged >or=60 years with poor-prognosis myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia undergoing transplantation with nonmyeloablative conditioning using fludarabine (125 mg/m2) and low-dose total body irradiation (2 Gy) followed by allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell grafts from HLA-identical sibling donors. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 60-71 years). In addition to age, 88% of patients had 1 or more adverse biological features of the disease. With a median follow-up of 21 months, 12 patients are alive, 11 of whom are disease free. The probabilities of 2-year overall and progression-free survival were 52% and 44%, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of relapse and of acute and chronic GVHD were 27%, 45%, and 74%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality at 100 days and 2 years was 8% and 25%, respectively. Of the 15 patients with extensive chronic GVHD, 1 patient relapsed. These data suggest that nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation is a feasible treatment option in patients aged >or=60 years with poor-prognosis myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. The reasonable disease control with nonmyeloablative transplantation in this high-risk group of patients merits further investigation.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT

We previously reported that the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was useful for predicting outcomes in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the sample size of patients with scores of 1 or more, captured by the CCI, did not exceed 35%. Further, some comorbidities were rarely found among patients who underwent HCT. Therefore, the current study was designed to (1) better define previously identified comorbidities using pretransplant laboratory data, (2) investigate additional HCT-related comorbidities, and (3) establish comorbidity scores that were suited for HCT. Data were collected from 1055 patients, and then randomly divided into training and validation sets. Weights were assigned to individual comorbidities according to their prognostic significance in Cox proportional hazard models. The new index was then validated. The new index proved to be more sensitive than the CCI since it captured 62% of patients with scores more than 0 compared with 12%, respectively. Further, the new index showed better survival prediction than the CCI (likelihood ratio of 23.7 versus 7.1 and c statistics of 0.661 versus 0.561, respectively, P < .001). In conclusion, the new simple index provided valid and reliable scoring of pretransplant comorbidities that predicted nonrelapse mortality and survival. This index will be useful for clinical trials and patient counseling before HCT.

Ablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults 60 years of age and older

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of ablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in older patients with hematologic malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated 52 patients from 1979 to 2002 with a median age of 62.8 years (range, 60.1 to 67.8 years) using ablative preparative regimens followed by allogeneic HCT from sibling donors. Diagnoses included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 35), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; n = 8), acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n = 6), and other (n = 3). Conditioning regimens included cyclophosphamide (CY) and busulfan (BU) (67%), total-body irradiation and CY (21%), BU-fludarabine (10%), and CY (2%).

RESULTS

Eighteen (35%) of 52 patients are alive at a median of 4.6 years (range, 0.8 to 9.1 years) after transplantation. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 300 and 218 days, respectively. Three-year OS and relapse rates are estimated to be 34% and 24%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates at 100 days and 3 years are estimated to be 27% and 43%, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 20% of patients, and chronic extensive GVHD was described in 53% of patients. Fourteen (40%) of 35 patients with MDS are alive at a median of 2.8 years (range, 0.8 to 8.2 years). Four of six patients with CML in chronic or accelerated phase are alive at a median of 6.9 years (range, 4.1 to 9.1 years) after transplantation. None of the patients with AML, CML in blast crisis, or other diagnoses have survived. Patients who underwent transplantation after 1993 had improved survival.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that allogeneic HCT is feasible in selected patients > or = 60 years of age, although novel methods to reduce NRM while maintaining efficacy are needed.