ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF

Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Efficient mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from bone marrow niche into circulation is the key to successful collection and transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. The efficacy of various HSCs mobilization regimens has been widely investigated, but the results are inconsistent.

Methods

We performed comprehensive databases searching for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that comparing the efficacy of HSCs mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed with WinBUGS. Standard dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF SD) was chosen as the common comparator. Estimates of relative treatment effects for other regimens were reported as mean differences (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with associated 95% credibility interval (95% CrI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were obtained to present rank probabilities of all included regimens.

Results

Databases searching and study selection identified 44 eligible RCTs, of which the mobilization results are summarized. Then we compared the efficacy of mobilization regimens separately for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) by including 13 eligible trials for network meta-analysis, involving 638 patients with MM and 592 patients with NHL. For patients with MM, data are pooled from 8 trials for 6 regimens, including G-CSF in standard dose (SD) or reduced dose (RD) combined with cyclophosphamide (CY), intermediate-dose cytarabine (ID-AraC) or plerixafor. The results show that compared with G-CSF SD alone, 3 regimens including ID-AraC + G-CSF SD (MD 14.29, 95% CrI 9.99–18.53; SUCRA 1.00), G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD (MD 4.15, 95% CrI 2.92–5.39; SUCRA 0.80), and CY + G-CSF RD (MD 1.18, 95% CrI 0.29–2.07; SUCRA 0.60) are associated with significantly increased total number of collected CD34⁺ cells (× 10⁶/kg), among which ID-AraC + G-CSF SD ranked first with a probability of being best regimen of 100%. Moreover, ID-AraC + G-CSF SD and G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD are associated with significantly higher successful rate of achieving optimal target (collecting ≥ 4–6 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg). For patients with NHL, data are pooled from 5 trials for 4 regimens, the results show that compared with G-CSF SD alone, G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD (MD 3.62, 95% CrI 2.86–4.38; SUCRA 0.81) and G-CSF SD plus the new CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR-4) antagonist YF-H-2015005 (MD 3.43, 95% CrI 2.51–4.35; SUCRA 0.69) are associated with significantly higher number of total CD34⁺ cells collected. These 2 regimens are also associated with significantly higher successful rate of achieving optimal target. There are no significant differences in rate of achieving optimal target between G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD and G-CSF + YF-H-2015005.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ID-AraC plus G-CSF is associated with the highest probability of being best mobilization regimen in patients with MM. For patients with NHL, G-CSF in combination with plerixafor or YF-H-2015005 showed similar improvements in HSCs mobilization efficacy. The relative effects of other chemotherapy-based mobilization regimens still require to be determined with further investigations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-022-02802-6.

High D-index during mobilization predicts poor mobilization of CD34+ cells after anti-lymphoma salvage chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Performing stem cell collection after mobilization chemotherapy was a well-balanced strategy between anti-tumor effect and efficient collection of CD34+ cells, but deep and prolonged nadir exposed patients to risk of febrile neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia was known to be associated with lower yields of CD34+ cells, but quantitative data referring to association between yields of CD34+ cells and severity of neutropenia was lacking. We hypothesized that D-index, which was developed for quantitative evaluation of severity of neutropenia especially in the field of hematologic malignancies, could predict yields of CD34+ cells.

METHODS

We performed a single center, retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma who were mobilized with ESHAP or modified ESHAP. We evaluated the association between yields of CD34+ cells at first apheresis and D-index.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included, and we demonstrated that yields of CD34+ cells from patients with higher D-index were significantly lower than those from patients with lower D-index. Multivariate linear regression analysis and logistic regression analysis also demonstrated the significant predictive power of D-index. Further, D-index was significantly correlated to platelet count before starting mobilization chemotherapy. Platelet count was known to predict yields of CD34+ cells, and combination of platelet count and D-index could identify patients with lowest CD34+ yields.

CONCLUSION

D-index could predict yields of CD34+ cells and it seemed that its predictive power was not less than that of platelet count. Prospective studies including more heterogeneous patients were needed to validate our study.

Selection of the mobilization regimen in lymphoma patients: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is recommended for patients with recurrent or refractory lymphoma after salvage chemotherapy. Stem cells which will be used in ASCT are provided by mobilization using granulocyte colony stimulation factor (G-CSF) or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of various mobilization regimens on the clinical parameters of lymphoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mobilization interventions of lymphoma patients were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the mobilization method implemented to collect stem cells before ASCT, (Group 1: Salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF, Group 2: Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, Group 3: G-CSF alone).

RESULTS

Analysis of CD34⁺ cell counts of the 3 groups revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001). Although the number of CD34⁺ cells collected were different, the neutrophil and platelet engraftment of the 3 groups were similar (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the results were similar in the separate analysis of NHL and HL patients. While the mobilization success rate in group 1 was 97.8 %, it was 90.2 % in group 3. This difference showed a certain trend towards statistical significance (p = 0.074). Patients who received DHAP plus G-CSF had a higher CD34⁺ count, while neutrophil engraftment was shorter than with ESHAP plus G-CSF (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the success rate of mobilization and number of CD34⁺ cell collected were higher in the salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF than G-CSF alone, G-CSF alone group provided similar neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment in most lymphoma patients.

A Review of Advances in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization and the Potential Role of Notch2 Blockade

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation can be a potential cure for hematological malignancies and some nonhematologic diseases. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) collected from peripheral blood after mobilization are the primary source to provide HSC transplantation. In most of the cases, mobilization by the cytokine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with chemotherapy, and in some settings, with the CXC chemokine receptor type 4 antagonist plerixafor, can achieve high yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). However, adequate mobilization is not always successful in a significant portion of donors. Research is going on to find new agents or strategies to increase HSC mobilization. Here, we briefly review the history of HSC transplantation, current mobilization regimens, some of the novel agents that are under investigation for clinical practice, and our recent findings from animal studies regarding Notch and ligand interaction as potential targets for HSPC mobilization.

Management of mobilization failure in 2017

In contemporary clinical practice, almost all allogeneic transplantations and autologous transplantations now capitalize on peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as opposed to bone marrow (BM) for the source of stem cells. In this context, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays a pivotal role as the most frequently applied frontline agent for stem cell mobilization. For patients classified as high-risk, chemotherapy based mobilization regimens can be preferred as a first choice and it is notable that this also used for remobilization. Mobilization failure occurs at a rate of 10%-40% with traditional strategies and it typically leads to low-efficiency practices, resource wastage, and delayed in treatment intervention. Notably, however, several factors can impact the effectiveness of CD34⁺ progenitor cell mobilization, including patient age and medical history (prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, disease and marrow infiltration at the time of mobilization). In recent years, main (yet largely ineffective) approach was to increase G-CSF dose and add SCF, but novel and promising pathways have been opened up by the synergistic impact of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF. The literature shows to its favorable results in upfront and failed mobilizers, and it is necessary to use plerixafor (or equivalent agents) to optimize HSC harvest in poor mobilizers. Different CXCR4 inhibitors, growth hormone, VLA4 inhibitors, and parathormone, have been cited as new agents for mobilization failure in recent years. In view of the above considerations, the purpose of this paper is to examine the mobilization of PBSC while focusing specifically on poor mobilizers.

Effective chemomobilization with etoposide and cytarabine (EC regimen) in lymphoma patients: a single-center, retrospective, observational study

Objective

Autologous stem cell transplantation is an important strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Although various regimens for peripheral blood stem cell collection have been used, the optimal regimen has not yet been established. We aimed to evaluate the mobilization efficacy and safety of the regimen consisted of etoposide and cytarabine (EC regimen).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 46 lymphoma patients who received peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with the EC regimen [etoposide (100 mg/m2/day, days 1-4) and cytarabine (100 mg/m2/day, days 1-4)] at Toyohashi municipal hospital from 2004 to 2013.

Results

The median age of the patients was 55 years. The most common underlying diseases were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (46%) and follicular lymphoma (26%). Three-quarters of patients were in their second complete or partial remission. The median total number of collected CD34+ cells was 10.6 × 106 kg-1. Forty-two patients (91%) yielded at least 2 × 106 kg-1 CD34+ cells within a median of 2 apheresis days, and 33 patients (72%) achieved it with only one apheresis. Successful mobilization was observed in five of six patients who failed to mobilize previously. Although febrile neutropenia occurred in 22 patients (48%), no fatal infection was observed.

Conclusion

The EC regimen was highly effective in lymphoma patients, including patients who mobilized poorly with other regimens.

DHAP plus filgrastim as an effective peripheral stem cell mobilization regimen for autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma: A single center experience

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of DHAP regimen plus filgrastim for mobilization of stem cells in patients with recurrent and/or refractory lymphoma. Thirty-four patients who took DHAP as salvage therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation were included. After chemotherapies, 2 cycles of DHAP plus filgrastim were administered to the patients. Stem cells from 32 patients (94%) were collected on median 11th day (8-12), and the median collected CD34(+) cell dose was 9.7 × 10(6)/kg (range 3.8-41.6). DHAP plus filgrastim was found to be an effective chemotherapy regimen in mobilizing CD34(+) stem cells into the peripheral.

Frequent Derepression of the Mesenchymal Transcription Factor Gene FOXC1 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Through in silico and other analyses, we identified FOXC1 as expressed in at least 20% of human AML cases, but not in normal hematopoietic populations. FOXC1 expression in AML was almost exclusively associated with expression of the HOXA/B locus. Functional experiments demonstrated that FOXC1 contributes to a block in monocyte/macrophage differentiation and enhances clonogenic potential. In in vivo analyses, FOXC1 collaborates with HOXA9 to accelerate significantly the onset of symptomatic leukemia. A FOXC1-repressed gene set identified in murine leukemia exhibited quantitative repression in human AML in accordance with FOXC1 expression, and FOXC1(high) human AML cases exhibited reduced morphologic monocytic differentiation and inferior survival. Thus, FOXC1 is frequently derepressed to functional effect in human AML.

The current status in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

Hemotopoietic stem cell mobilization with cytokines alone, has still been widely accepted as the initial attempt for stem cell mobilization. Chemotherapy based mobilization can be preferred as first choice in high risk patients or for remobilization. But mobilization failure still remains to be a problem in one third of patients. Salvage mobilization strategies have been composed to give one more chance to 'poor mobilizers'. Synergistic effect of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF has opened a new era for these patients. Preemptive approach in predicted poor mobilizers, immediate salvage approach for patients with suboptimal mobilization or remobilization approach of plerixafor in failed mobilizers have all been demonstrated convincing results in various studies. Alternative CXCR4 inhibitors, VLA4 inhibitors, bortezomib, parathormone have also been emerged as novel agents for mobilization failure.

Intermediate doses of cytarabine plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor as an effective and safe regimen for hematopoietic stem cell collection in lymphoma patients with prior mobilization failure

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an effective treatment for patients with lymphomas. However, failure to reach the minimum threshold of hematopoietic stem cells to proceed to ASCT may occur, even with the most effective strategies currently available.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We report on 33 patients diagnosed with lymphoma who had at least one prior mobilization failure and received cytarabine at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) /day intravenously × 3 days plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 to 12 μg/kg/day as mobilization regimen. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was three.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 33 patients (96.8%) reached the target CD34+ cell dose (>2 × 10(6) /kg). The mean (range) number of apheresis procedures was 1.8 (1-3) with 4.69 × 10(6) (1.5 × 10(6) -6.8 × 10(6) )/kg CD34+ cells obtained. All but one patient received chemomobilization in the outpatient department. Severe infections or treatment-related mortality were not observed. All patients that received ASCT (31/33) engrafted without requiring G-CSF during the posttransplant period.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that cytarabine at intermediate doses plus G-CSF in patients diagnosed with lymphoma who had a prior mobilization failure is a feasible and effective mobilization regimen.

Factors determining pbsc mobilization efficiency and nonmobilization following ICE with or without rituximab (R-ICE) salvage therapy for refractory or relapsed lymphoma prior to autologous transplantation

ICE/R-ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide without or with rituximab) chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is an established regimen in refractory/relapsed lymphoma. Few studies have addressed which factors are important in determining peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization efficiency or nonmobilization following ICE/R-ICE. Between 2004 and 2013, 88 patients with refractory/relapsed lymphoma who received ICE/R-ICE salvage-chemotherapy prior to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulated PBSC mobilization at a single center were identified. Mobilization efficiency was assessed by time from ICE/R-ICE to day of harvest, duration of G-CSF use, days to peripheral blood (PB) CD34(+) ≥15/µL, PB CD34(+) number on harvest day, CD34(+) yield and nonmobilization rate. Median PB CD34(+) at harvest were 54/μL (7-524); median days to first apheresis was 15 (11-30); median harvested total CD34(+) were 5.46 × 10(6) /kg (0.96-44.36); 71 patients (80.7%) successfully mobilized; 20 (22.7%) patients were poor mobilizers; 14 (15.9%) patients were considered nonmobilizers with maximal PB CD34(+) <7/µL and did not proceed to apheresis. Six of 20 poor mobilizers were apheresed with PB CD34(+) 7-12/µL, 50% were successfully harvested. No differences were found between ICE and R-ICE regimens. Impaired mobilization efficiency was associated with age, remission status, >1 line of induction chemotherapy, four cycles ICE/R-ICE and grade 4 neutropenia. Prior bone marrow (BM) involvement was associated with nonmobilization. The majority of patients can be successfully mobilized with ICE/R-ICE. Prior BM involvement is associated with high rates of nonmobilization following ICE/R-ICE. Such patients may benefit from novel mobilization agents and/or alternative salvage regimens to ICE/R-ICE.

R-ESHAP plus pegfilgrastim as an effective peripheral stem cell mobilization regimen for autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Stem cell (SC) mobilization is significantly influenced by the mobilization schedule in patients with lymphoma. We evaluated data from 30 patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing SC mobilization. All received R-ESHAP plus a single dose of pegfilgrastim. All patients collected ⩾ 2 × 10(6) CD34+cells/kg, 80% of them at least 5 × 10(6) CD34+cells/kg. Adverse effects of the regimen included myelosuppression and neutropenic fever. Herein, our results suggest that R-ESHAP plus pegfilgrastim is a highly effective mobilization strategy in patients affected by DLBCL associated with a low incidence of adverse events.

Advances in stem cell mobilization

Use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) has largely replaced bone marrow (BM) as a source of stem cells for both autologous and allogeneic cell transplantation. With G-CSF alone, up to 35% of patients are unable to mobilize sufficient numbers of CD34 cells/kg to ensure successful and consistent multi-lineage engraftment and sustained hematopoietic recovery. To this end, research is ongoing to identify new agents or combinations which will lead to the most effective and efficient stem cell mobilization strategies, especially in those patients who are at risk for mobilization failure. We describe both established agents and novel strategies at various stages of development. The latter include but are not limited to drugs that target the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis, S1P agonists, VCAM/VLA-4 inhibitors, parathyroid hormone, proteosome inhibitors, Groβ, and agents that stabilize HIF. While none of the novel agents have yet gained an established role in HPC mobilization in clinical practice, many early studies exploring these new pathways show promising results and warrant further investigation.

Which regimen is better for stem cell mobilization of lymphoma patients?

Although chemotherapy combined with G-CSF is an effective method for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, standard chemotherapy protocol leading to best stem cell yield is not defined. In our study, we aimed to assess the impact of chemotherapy choice on mobilization outcome in lymphoma patients. Patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (n:15), ASHAP (n:11) or VGEPP (n:12) protocols. Groups were similar according to collected CD34+ cell count, total nucleated cell count and median apheresis days. Five out of fifteen (33%) patients could not be mobilized in Cy group but there was only one failed mobilization attempt in both salvage groups (9% with ASHAP vs 8% with VGEPP). In conclusion, we showed that VGEPP and ASHAP are safe protocols in terms of stem cell mobilization and have similar mobilization capacity as cyclophosphamide alone.

Optimal timing of G-CSF administration for effective autologous stem cell collection

The best time of G-CSF administration for PBPC collection remains to be defined. We aimed to identify optimal G-CSF administration timing for efficient autologous stem cell collection. A total of 262 lymphoma or multiple myeloma patients, who underwent PBPC collection from January 2000 to March 2008, were included. PBPCs were mobilized with chemotherapy followed by lenograstim at 10 μg/kg/day. Patients received lenograstim at 2000 hours, about half a day before leukapheresis (PM group) before November 2004, and at 0600 hours, 3 h before apheresis (AM group) subsequently. In the AM group, the median number of total collected CD34+ cells/kg was greater over a shorter duration of apheresis, and the median number of collected CD34+ cells/kg at first leukapheresis was larger. Stem cell collection efficacy (ratio of total collected CD34+ cells/kg per number of leukapheresis procedures) was higher, and proportion of patients who yielded an optimum harvest was larger. The statistically significant between-group difference was observed only in patients with high-dose CY chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization in subgroup analysis. The present study showed that G-CSF injection 3 h before apheresis improved the efficacy of autologous stem cell collection.

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Tactics

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the methods and collection techniques currently used in stem cell mobilization for patients undergoing autologous transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

Literature search was performed through PubMed (1948-August 2009) and MEDLINE (1977-August 2009). Reference citations from publications identified were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All literature identified was reviewed for inclusion. Original research and retrospective cohorts, along with previously published systematic reviews of stem cell mobilization and growth factors, were evaluated. Abstract data on plerixafor were also reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Successful mobilization of an adequate number of progenitor cells can help ensure and improve time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. A variety of methods have been studied to find the safest and most predictable mobilization of CD34+ progenitor cells, including use of single agents or the combinations of hematopoietic growth factors, chemotherapy, and a novel chemokine receptor 4 antagonist. Currently, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 Mg/kg daily started 4 days prior to apheresis remains the standard of care for initial mobilization therapy. In patients who fail to mobilize or who are at high risk for mobilization failure, cyclophosphamide in conjunction with G-CSF may be used. Plerixafor, a novel chemokine receptor antagonist, in combination with G-CSF has demonstrated superiority for achieving collection goals compared to G-CSF alone in 2 Phase 3 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal mobilization strategy is still unknown; however, colony-stimulating factors remain the most commonly used mobilization agents. Currently, chemotherapy or plerixafor in combination with G-CSF is a reasonable option in heavily pretreated and hard-to-mobilize patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with residual extranodal involvement

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Koreans is frequently accompanied by extranodal (EN) disease at the time of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We sought to determine whether high EN involvement affected survival following ASCT in Koreans.

METHODS

We reviewed 27 patients who had DLBCL with residual disease at ASCT: 13 with residual disease at nodal site(s) only and 14 with nodal and EN disease.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that disease status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and performance status at ASCT were predictors of survival following ASCT. The number of EN sites, as categorized by the International Prognostic Index system, had no prognostic significance. When EN involvement at ASCT was classified as negative or positive, the 2-year overall survival for the negative group was 64%, significantly better than the 14% for the positive group (p=0.021), and the event-free survival for the negative group was 62%, significantly better than the 14% for the positive group (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had DLBCL with residual EN involvement at ASCT showed worse outcomes following ASCT compared to those without EN disease.

Predictors for successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with ESHAP + G-CSF in patients with pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

ESHAP (etoposide/methylprednisolone/cytarabine/cisplatin) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective regimen of therapy for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization. However, the timing of PBPC harvest following immobilization and factors to predict optimal PBPC yield remain to be explored. We herein analyzed the factors potentially correlated to optimal PBPC mobilization.

METHODS

Twenty patients with pretreated advanced NHL were recruited and mobilized with ESHAP + G-CSF followed by 2 leukaphereses, which were initiated once the white blood cell count (WBC) in peripheral blood exceeded 10 x 10(9)/L.

RESULTS

Total CD34+ cells collected by 2 leukaphereses were > 2 x 10(6)/kg body weight in 16 patients; between 1.0 and 2.0 x 10(6)/kg in another 3, and < 1 x 10(6)/kg in the remaining 1 patient. The pre-leukapheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, available for 28 leukaphereses, correlated linearly with the CD34+ cell yields (r2 = 0.870, p < 0.001). The CD34+ cell yield with pre-leukapheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count > or = 50 x 10(6)/L was higher than that with < 50 x 10(6)/L (5.60 +/- 4.32 vs. 0.96 +/- 0.56 x 10(6)/kg/leukapheresis; p = 0.004). Other factors predictive of favorable PBPC yield included preceding chemotherapy cycles < 6 and peripheral blood WBC > 3,500/microL on the day of mobilization chemotherapy (p = 0.032 and 0.013, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The pre-leukapheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count correlates well with PBPC yields. Less than 6 chemotherapy cycles before mobilization and adequate peripheral blood WBC before mobilization chemotherapy also predict a favorable PBPC yield.

An analysis of the optimal timing of peripheral blood stem cell harvesting following priming with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF

Increasing demand on the apheresis service makes efficient harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) essential. A total of 168 adult patients with haematological malignancy were primed using low-moderate dose cyclophosphamide (1.5-3 g/m(2)) with G-CSF 5-10 microg/kg per day. Harvesting was booked and peripheral blood (PB) counts first checked between 6 and 10 days post-priming. One hundred and thirty (77%) patients harvested successfully (total harvest yield > or =2 x 10(6) CD34(+)/kg) and the median PBSC collection per procedure was 2.18 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.1-14.5). Only more lines of prior chemotherapy predicted failure to harvest in multivariate analysis (P=0.003). The PB CD34(+) cell count correlated significantly with harvest yield (r=0.8448, P<0.0001). A PB CD34(+) count > or =10/microl predicted a collection of > or =2 x 10(6)/kg (positive-predictive value of 61%, negative-predictive-value 100%). Patients first attending day 9 required significantly fewer visits to achieve a successful harvest than those first attending days 6-8 without increasing the risk of failure. No significant difference in failure rates, number of days attending and total harvest yield was found between days 9 and 10 attendees. Collection from day 9 may however enable higher target yields to be achieved. PB CD34(+) count monitoring should commence and harvesting booked from day 9 to optimize both the harvest and the efficiency of the PBSC harvesting service.

Rituximab-ESHAP as a mobilization regimen for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas: a comparison with ESHAP

BACKGROUND

It has previously been shown that ESHAP was an effective mobilization regimen for patients with pretreated lymphoma. To extend these observations, the efficacy and feasibility of rituximab plus ESHAP regimen in CD20+ B-cell NHL were assessed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The mobilization efficacy and engraftment characteristics were compared in the 22 patients who received the rituximab plus ESHAP (R-ESHAP) with 33 historical controls who received ESHAP.

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were well matched in patient characteristics. In the R-ESHAP group, 62 pheresis procedures were performed. Apheresis procedures were started on median Day 16 (range, Days 13-18). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 10.6 x 10(6) per kg (range, 4.9 x 10(6)-52.6 x 10(6)/kg). Nineteen (95%) patients achieved optimal peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, defined as at least 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to mobilization efficacy. Sixteen patients in the R-ESHAP group (73%) underwent autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (APBPCT). The median time to absolute neutrophil count at least 0.5 x 10(9) per L was 10 days (range, 8-17 days), and the median time to a platelet count of at least 20 x 10(9) per L was 12 days (range, 7-27 days). Lymphocyte recovery was slower in the R-ESHAP group, but the rate of infectious complications was similar in the two groups. In the R-ESHAP group, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival after APBPCT were 63.2 and 57.4 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Addition of rituximab to ESHAP chemotherapy did not have any adverse effects on PBPC mobilization. Further studies are needed, however, to determine whether addition of rituximab improves outcomes.

ESHAP+fixed dose G-CSF as autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell and Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single institution result of 127 patients

From 1996 to November 2004, 131 consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD) received ESHAP as mobilization chemotherapy before autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients received fixed dose G-CSF 300 microg SC bid starting 24-36 h after finishing mobilizing ESHAP. In all, four patients failed mobilization and are excluded. Characteristics of 127 patients: 68 males: 59 females. DLCL 49: HD 78. Initial stage I:II:III:IV:unknown was 15:34:33:42:3. Median age at ASCT 26 years. Median prior chemotherapy cycles were six [<6 (17 patients), 6-8 (90 patients), >8 (20 patients)]. Median ESHAP cycle used as mobilizer was third. Patients required 1, 2, 3, 4 apheresis were 93:25:8:1. Median total CD34+ cells/kg collected were 6.9 x 10(6) (DLCL 5.17 x 10(6) and HD 7.6 x 10(6)), patients weighing < or = 70 kg (93 patients) 6.54 x 10(6) and >70 kg (34 patients) 7.44 x 10(6) (P = 0.59), one apheresis (93 patients) 8.6 x 10(6)/kg and >1 apheresis (34 patients) 4.5 x 10(6) (P = 0.001). We conclude that ESHAP and G-CSF 300 microg SC bid is an effective mobilizing regimen even in patients >70 kg and most patients require only 1-2 apheresis.

Prospective randomized comparative observation of single- vs split-dose lenograstim to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells following chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

In patients with hematologic malignancies, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following chemotherapy is widely used to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), but there have been no trials comparing schedules of G-CSF following chemotherapy. We conducted a prospective randomized comparative observation of the mobilization with a single dose (10 microg kg once a day) or split dose (5 microg kg twice a day) of lenograstim following chemotherapy in 25 multiple myeloma (MM) and 15 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. Chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 for MM and ESHAP with or without Rituximab for NHL. The median number of harvested CD34+ cells was 19.4 x 10(6)/kg and 15.8 x 10(6)/kg in the single- and split-dose groups, respectively (p=0.47). Targeted collection of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved in 18/20 patients in the single-dose group and in all 20 patients of the split-dose group (p=0.24), with the median number of sessions 1 and 2 in the single- and split-dose groups, respectively (p=0.13). We could not observe statistically significant differences between a single-dose and split-dose lenograstim following chemotherapy in enhancing the mobilization of PBPCs in MM or NHL patients.