CYP2C9 Genotype-guided Warfarin Prescribing Enhances the Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Implementation and Evaluation Strategies for Pharmacogenetic Testing in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenetic testing in clinical settings has improved the safety and efficacy of drug treatment. There is a growing number of studies evaluating pharmacogenetic implementation and identifying barriers and facilitators. However, no review has focused on bridging the gap between identifying barriers and facilitators of testing and the clinical strategies adopted in response. This review was conducted to understand the implementation and evaluation strategies of pharmacogenetic testing programs.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant scoping review was conducted. The included studies discussed pharmacogenetic testing programs implemented in a hospital setting. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed design methods were included.

RESULTS

A total of 232 of the 7043 articles that described clinical pharmacogenetic programs were included. The most common specialties that described pharmacogenetic implementation were psychiatry (26%) and oncology (16%), although many studies described institutional programs implemented across multiple specialties (19%). Different specialties reported different clinical outcomes, but all reported similar program performance indicators, such as test uptake and the number of times the test recommendations were followed. There were benefits and drawbacks to delivering test results through research personnel, pharmacists, and electronic alerts, but active engagement of physicians was necessary for the incorporation of pharmacogenetic results into clinical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is required on the maintenance and sustainability of pharmacogenetic testing initiatives. These findings provide an overview of the implementation and evaluation strategies of different specialties that can be used to improve pharmacogenetic testing.

Kinetic-pharmacodynamic model of warfarin for prothrombin time-international normalized ratio in Japanese patients

AIMS

Genotype-guided dosing algorithms can explain about half of the interindividual variability in prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) under warfarin treatment. This study aimed to refine a published kinetic-pharmacodynamic model and guide warfarin dosage for an optimal PT-INR based on renal function.

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort of adult patients (>20 years) who were administered warfarin and underwent PT-INR measurements, we refined the kinetic-pharmacodynamic model with age and the genotypes of cytochrome P450 2C9 and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 using the PRIOR subroutine in the nonlinear-mixed-effect modelling programme. We searched the significant covariates for parameters, such as the dose rate for 50% inhibition of coagulation (EDR50 ), using a stepwise forward and backward method. Monte Carlo simulation determined a required daily dose of warfarin with a target range of PT-INR (2.0-3.0 or 1.6-2.6) based on the significant covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients with 2762 PT-INR measurements were enrolled (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: 47.5 [range: 2.6-199.0] mL/min/1.73 m2 ). The final kinetic-pharmacodynamic model showed that the EDR50 changed power functionally with body surface area, serum albumin level and eGFR. Monte Carlo simulation revealed that a lower daily dose of warfarin was required to attain the target PT-INR range as eGFR decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Model-informed precision dosing of warfarin is a valuable approach for estimating its dosage in patients with renal impairment.

The Impact of CYP2C9*11 Allelic Variant on the Pharmacokinetics of Phenytoin and (S)-Warfarin

Cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) is responsible for the oxidative metabolism of about 15% of commonly used drugs, some of which are characterized by a narrow therapeutic window. CYP2C9 is highly polymorphic, and over 60 alleles have been described. CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 are the most common polymorphisms among White patients and both are associated with decreased activity. The evidence concerning the functional importance of less frequent variant alleles is scarce. The objective of the current study was to characterize the in vivo activity of CYP2C9 among carriers of CYP2C9*11, one of the "African" alleles and the fourth most common CYP2C9 variant allele among White patients by using two prototype substrates, phenytoin and (S)-warfarin. Single 300-mg phenytoin and 20-mg warfarin doses were given to 150 healthy Ethiopian Jewish participants who were nonsmokers, at least one week apart. (S)-warfarin oral clearance and phenytoin metabolic ratio (PMR) derived from the ratio of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin in 24-hour urine collection to plasma phenytoin 12 hours (PMR 24/12) or 24 hours (PMR 24/24) post dosing, were used as markers of CYP2C9 activity. PMR 24/12 and PMR 24/24 were reduced by 50% and 62.2%, respectively, among carriers of CYP2C9*1/*11 (n = 13) as compared with carriers of CYP2C9*1/*1 (n = 127) (false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.001). The respective decrease in (S)-warfarin oral clearance was 52.6% (FDR q < 0.001). In conclusion, the enzyme encoded by CYP2C9*11 is characterized by a more than 50% decrease in the enzymatic activity, resembling the extent of decrease associated with CYP2C9*3 ("no-function allele"). Among patients of African ancestry, CYP2C9*11 genetic analysis should be considered prior to prescribing of narrow therapeutic window drugs such as phenytoin, warfarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or siponimod.

Phenytoin Metabolic Ratio, a Marker of CYP2C9 Activity, is Superior to the CYP2C9 Genotype as a Predictor of (S)-Warfarin Clearance

BACKGROUND

CYP2C9 is a member of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily responsible for the metabolism of 16% of drugs that undergo oxidative metabolism. The activity of CYP2C9 exhibits marked inter-individual variability, which translates into prominent differences in the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 substrates, some of which are characterized by a narrow therapeutic window. Genetic polymorphisms in the gene encoding for CYP2C9 account for a fraction of the variability in CYP2C9 activity. The phenytoin metabolic ratio (PMR) is a marker of CYP2C9 activity in vivo, which correlates with CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the ability of the PMR to predict the oral clearance of (S)-warfarin (SWOCL) and its formation clearance towards its CYP2C9-mediated metabolites (SWCLf) [i.e., 6- and 7-hydroxy-(S)-warfarin].

METHODS

The study was conducted in 150 healthy non-smoker subjects (segment 1) and 60 patients treated with warfarin (segment 2). In the first segment, the participants received on two separate occasions a single 300-mg dose of phenytoin and at least 7 days later a single dose of warfarin (5 or 10 mg). The same PMR procedure was performed in the second segment, except that it was performed either before warfarin initiation or after the patients had reached stable anticoagulation. The PMR was derived from the ratio of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenyl-hydantoin content in a 24-hour urine collection to plasma phenytoin concentration 12- (PMR24/12) or 24- (PMR24/24) post-dosing. In segment 1, SWOCL was calculated from the ratio of (S)-warfarin dose to the warfarin area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and the SWCLf from the ratio of urine content of 6- and 7-hydroxy-(S)-warfarin to (S)-warfarin area under the (S)-warfarin plasma concentration-time curve until the last measured timepoint. In segment 2, estimated SWOCL was derived from the ratio of (S)-warfarin dose to the mid-interval plasma concentration of (S)-warfarin.

RESULTS

The PMR, SWOCL, and SWCLf varied significantly between carriers of different CYP2C9 genotypes in both healthy subjects (p < 0.001) and patients (p < 0.005). However, PMR and SWOCL values exhibited substantial intra-genotypic variability. PMR24/12 and PMR24/24 were significantly correlated with SWOCL both in healthy subjects (r = 0.62 and r = 0.67, respectively, p < 0.001) and in patients (r = 0.57 and r = 0.61, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multiple regression model that included all variables that correlated with SWOCL, PMR was the strongest predictor, explaining 44% and 38% of the variability in SWOCL among healthy subjects and patients, respectively, and accounting for 95.7% (44%/46%) and 90.5% (38%/42%) of the total explained variability in SWOCL among healthy subjects and patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMR is the strongest predictor of SWOCL, and as such, it exhibits a significant advantage over the CYP2C9 genotype. The inclusion of PMR in future dosing algorithms of CYP2C9 substrates characterized by a narrow therapeutic window should be encouraged and further investigated.

Implementation of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support for health systems: a cost-utility analysis

We constructed a cost-effectiveness model to assess the clinical and economic value of a CDS alert program that provides pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing results, compared to no alert program in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF), from a health system perspective. We defaulted that 20% of 500,000 health-system members between the ages of 55 and 65 received PGx testing for CYP2C19 (ACS-clopidogrel) and CYP2C9, CYP4F2 and VKORC1 (AF-warfarin) annually. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated over 20 years with an annual discount rate of 3%. In total, 3169 alerts would be fired. The CDS alert program would help avoid 16 major clinical events and 6 deaths for ACS; and 2 clinical events and 0.9 deaths for AF. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $39,477/QALY. A PGx-CDS alert program was cost-effective, under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY gained, compared to no alert program.

Ethnic Diversity and Warfarin Pharmacogenomics

Warfarin has remained the most commonly prescribed vitamin K oral anticoagulant worldwide since its approval in 1954. Dosing challenges including having a narrow therapeutic window and a wide interpatient variability in dosing requirements have contributed to making it the most studied drug in terms of genotype-phenotype relationships. However, most of these studies have been conducted in Whites or Asians which means the current pharmacogenomics evidence-base does not reflect ethnic diversity. Due to differences in minor allele frequencies of key genetic variants, studies conducted in Whites/Asians may not be applicable to underrepresented populations such as Blacks, Hispanics/Latinos, American Indians/Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians/other Pacific Islanders. This may exacerbate health inequalities when Whites/Asians have better anticoagulation profiles due to the existence of validated pharmacogenomic dosing algorithms which fail to perform similarly in the underrepresented populations. To examine the extent to which individual races/ethnicities are represented in the existing body of pharmacogenomic evidence, we review evidence pertaining to published pharmacogenomic dosing algorithms, including clinical utility studies, cost-effectiveness studies and clinical implementation guidelines that have been published in the warfarin field.

Genetic-Guided Pharmacotherapy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic and Critical Review of Economic Evaluations

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the extent and quality of evidence from economic evaluations (EEs) of genetic-guided pharmacotherapy (PGx) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and to identify variables influential in changing base-case conclusions.

METHODS

From systematic searches, we included EEs of existing PGx testing to guide pharmacotherapy for AF, without restrictions on population characteristics or language. Articles excluded were genetic tests used to guide device-based therapy or focused on animals.

RESULTS

We found 18 EEs (46 comparisons), all model-based cost-utility analysis with or without cost-effectiveness analysis mostly from health system's perspectives, of PGx testing to determine coumadin/direct-acting anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing (14 of 18), to stratify patients into coumadin/DOACs (3 of 18), or to increase patients' adherence to coumadin (1 of 18) versus non-PGx. Most PGx to determine coumadin dosing found PGx more costly and more effective than standard or clinical coumadin dosing (19 of 24 comparisons) but less costly and less effective than standard DOAC dosing (14 of 14 comparisons). The remaining comparisons were too few to observe any trend. Of 61 variables influential in changing base-case conclusions, effectiveness of PGx testing was the most common (37%), accounted for in the models using time-based or medication-based approaches or relative risk. The cost of PGx testing has decreased and plateaued over time.

CONCLUSIONS

EEs to date only partially inform decisions on selecting optimal PGx testing for AF, because most evidence focuses on PGx testing to determine coumadin dosing, but less on other purposes. Future EE may refer to the list of influential variables and the approaches used to account for the effect of PGx testing to inform data collection and study design.

Changing from mandatory to optional genotyping results in higher acceptance of pharmacist-guided warfarin dosing

Aim: We evaluated the clinical acceptance and feasibility of a pharmacist-guided personalized consult service following its transition from a mandatory (mPGx) to optional (oPGx) CYP2C9/VKORC1/CYP4F2 genotyping for warfarin. Methods: A total of 1105 patients were included. Clinical acceptance and feasibility outcomes were analyzed using bivariate and multivariable analyses. Results: After transitioning to optional genotyping, genotype testing was still ordered in a large segment of the eligible population (52.1%). Physician acceptance of pharmacist-recommended doses improved from 83.9% (mPGx) to 86.6% (oPGx; OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.5; p = 0.01) with a shorter median genotype result turnaround time (oPGX: 23.6 h vs mPGX: 25.1 h; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Ordering of genotype testing and provider acceptance of dosing recommendations remained high after transitioning to optional genotyping.

Efficacy and safety of genotype-guided warfarin dosing versus non-genotype-guided warfarin dosing strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of genotype-guided dosing (GD) strategies compared to non-genotype-guided dosing (non-GD) strategies for warfarin.

METHODS

Databases were searched up to July 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager software (version 5.4) and R (version 4.0.5). Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on ethnicity and dosing regimen in non-GD group. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the relation of covariates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021245654).

RESULTS

27 randomized controlled trials with a total of 9906 patients were included. The GD group resulted in a significantly improved time in therapeutic range compared with non-GD group in follow-up duration within 30 days (MD: 5.95, 95%CI: 2.41-9.22, P = 0.001) and beyond 30 days (MD: 4.93, 1.40-8.47, P = 0.006), time to the first therapeutic international normalized ratio (MD: -1.80, -2.69 - -0.92, P < 0.0001), and time to reach stable dose (MD: -5.08, -7.09 - -3.07, P < 0.00001), incidence of major bleeding events (RR: 0.50, 0.33-0.75, P = 0.0008), total bleeding events (RR: 0.83, 0.73-0.95, P = 0.006), and thromboembolism (RR: 0.69, 0.49-0.96, P = 0.03). No differences were found in stable dose achievement, minor bleeding events, over anticoagulation, and all-cause mortality. Four improved efficacy outcomes were observed in GD group compared with fixed dosing group. Only time to the therapeutic INR was shortened in GD group compared with clinical adjusted dosing group. The result showed no difference of safety outcomes between GD group and fixed dosing group whereas a decreased incidence of major bleeding events was observed when comparing to clinical adjusted dosing group.

CONCLUSION

GD strategy was superior to fixed dosing strategy in term of efficacy outcomes and comparable to fixed dosing strategy in safety outcomes. Clinical adjusted regimen could partly substitute the genotype-guided dosing strategy for efficacy in insufficient conditions, but the risk of major bleeding events should be monitored.

Acenocoumarol Pharmacogenetic Dosing Algorithm versus Usual Care in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) require immediate treatment with anticoagulants such as acenocoumarol. This multicentre randomised clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of a dosing pharmacogenetic algorithm versus a standard-of-care dose adjustment at the beginning of acenocoumarol treatment. We included 144 patients with VTE. On the day of recruitment, a blood sample was obtained for genotyping (CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, VKORC1, CYP4F2, APOE). Dose adjustment was performed on day 3 or 4 after the start of treatment according to the assigned group and the follow-up was at 12 weeks. The principal variable was the percentage of patients with an international normalised ratio (INR) within the therapeutic range on day 7. Thirty-four (47.2%) patients had an INR within the therapeutic range at day 7 after the start of treatment in the genotype-guided group compared with 14 (21.9%) in the control group (p = 0.0023). There were no significant differences in the time to achieve a stable INR, the number of INRs within the range in the first 6 weeks and at the end of study. Our results suggest the use of a pharmacogenetic algorithm for patients with VTE could be useful in achieving target INR control in the first days of treatment.

A network meta-analysis of CYP2C9, CYP2C9 with VKORC1 and CYP2C9 with VKORC1 and CYP4F2 genotype-based warfarin dosing strategies compared to traditional

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Variations in genotypes were observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated genotype-based warfarin dosing. We carried out a network meta-analysis to assess whether any clinically significant differences exist between RCTs evaluating CYP2C9 with VKORC1, with CYP2C9 alone and CYP2C9, VKORC1, with CYP4F2 dosing strategies.

METHODS

Electronic records were searched for RCTs comparing genotype-based warfarin with traditional-dosing strategies. Key outcomes included were the time to first therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR); time to stable INR or warfarin dose; percent time in therapeutic range (TTR); and the proportion of patients with supra-therapeutic INR. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were the effect estimates.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twenty-six studies (7898 patients) were included. CYP2C9-based warfarin dosing was associated with a shorter time to first therapeutic INR (WMD: -2.73, 95% CI: -3.41, -2.05) and stable INR/warfarin dose (WMD: -8.1, 95% CI: -12.54, -3.66). CYP2C9 and VKORC1 were observed with a shorter time to first therapeutic INR (WMD: -1.92, 95% CI: -3.23, -0.61) and stable INR/warfarin dose (WMD: -4.6, 95% CI: -6.87, -2.34) along with a longer TTR (%) (WMD: 3.91, 95% CI: 1.18, 6.63). CYP2C9, VKORC1 and CYP4F2 were observed with a reduced proportion of patients with supra-therapeutic INR (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.93). Trial sequential analysis confirms the superior benefits of CYP2C9 with VKORC1 genotype.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The present evidence is supportive of personalizing warfarin dose based only on CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes compared to traditional strategies. More RCTs are needed to delineate any benefit for adding CYP4F2 to provide sufficient power for pooled analysis. No convincing evidence exists supporting the role of CYP2C9 alone.

Comparative efficacy and safety of warfarin care bundles and novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Warfarin care bundles (e.g. genotype-guided warfarin dosing, patient’s self-testing [PST] or patient’s self-management [PSM] and left atrial appendage closure) are based on the concept of combining several interventions to improve anticoagulation care. NOACs are also introduced for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). However, these interventions have not been compared in head-to-head trials yet. We did a network meta-analysis based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulant interventions for SPAF. Studies comparing these interventions in adults, whether administered alone or as care bundles were included in the analyses. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Thirty-seven studies, involving 100,142 patients were assessed. Compared to usual care, PSM significantly reduced the risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.24, 95% CI 0.08–0.68). For major bleeding, edoxaban 60 mg (0.80, 0.71–0.90), edoxaban 30 mg (0.48, 0.42–0.56), and dabigatran 110 mg (0.81, 0.71–0.94) significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with usual warfarin care. Cluster rank plot incorporating stroke and major bleeding outcomes indicates that some warfarin care bundles perform as well as NOACs. Both interventions are therefore viable options to be considered for SPAF. Additional studies including head-to-head trials and cost-effectiveness evaluation are still warranted.

Chinese Patients With Heart Valve Replacement Do Not Benefit From Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Testing on Anticoagulation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing has been shown in some randomized trials to improve anticoagulation outcomes in individuals of European ancestry; yet, its utility in Chinese patients with heart valve replacement remains unresolved.

METHODS

A total of 2264 patients who underwent heart valve replacement at Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, namely, a genotype-guided and a traditional clinically guided warfarin dosing group. In the genotype-guided group (n = 1134), genotyping for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 (-1639 G→A) was performed using TaqMan genotyping assay. Warfarin doses were predicted with the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm. Patients in the control group (n = 1130) were clinically guided. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of adverse events (major bleeding and thrombotic) during a 90-day follow-up period between 2 groups. Secondary objectives were to describe effects of the pharmacogenetic intervention on the first therapeutic-target-achieving time, the stable maintenance dose, and the hospitalization days.

RESULTS

A total of 2245 patients were included in the analysis. Forty-nine events occurred during follow-up. Genotype-guided dosing strategy did not result in a reduction in major bleeding (0.26% versus 0.63%; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.53; P = 0.20) and thrombotic events (0.89% versus 1.61%; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.17; P = 0.12) compared with clinical dosing group. Compared with traditional dosing, patients in the genotype-guided group reached their therapeutic international normalized ratio in a shorter time (3.8 ± 2.0 versus 4.4 ± 2.0 days, P < 0.001). There was no difference in hospitalization days (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin pharmacogenetic testing according to the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm cannot improve anticoagulation outcomes in Chinese patients with heart valve replacement.

Genomics of disease risk in globally diverse populations

Risk of disease is multifactorial and can be shaped by socio-economic, demographic, cultural, environmental and genetic factors. Our understanding of the genetic determinants of disease risk has greatly advanced with the advent of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which detect associations between genetic variants and complex traits or diseases by comparing populations of cases and controls. However, much of this discovery has occurred through GWAS of individuals of European ancestry, with limited representation of other populations, including from Africa, The Americas, Asia and Oceania. Population demography, genetic drift and adaptation to environments over thousands of years have led globally to the diversification of populations. This global genomic diversity can provide new opportunities for discovery and translation into therapies, as well as a better understanding of population disease risk. Large-scale multi-ethnic and representative biobanks and population health resources provide unprecedented opportunities to understand the genetic determinants of disease on a global scale.

Pharmacogenetics of anticoagulants used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation

Introduction: The inclusion of pharmacogenetics alongside clinical information in anticoagulant therapy offers the opportunity for a tailored approach to treatment according to individual patient characteristics. Areas covered: Literature was searched using PubMed database, focusing on pharmacogenetics of oral anticoagulants. Original research articles and review articles in English language were included in the literature reviewed. This article includes all information available for the genetic cause of inter-individual variability in anticoagulation response to oral anticoagulant drugs. The pharmacogenetics of VKAs and NOACs are described in detail. Expert opinion: There have been numerous studies focusing on the pharmacogenetics of VKAs, particularly warfarin. Current evidence suggests that known genetic and clinical factors explain a large proportion of the inter-individual variability in response to warfarin. Pharmacogenetic-based algorithms have been validated to determine their clinical utility with equivocal results. To date, only a limited number of mostly small studies on the pharmacogenetics of NOACs exists. The latter have highlighted genetic polymorphisms in specific genes that may affect clinical outcomes. Further evaluations of these polymorphisms are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn about the significance of pharmacogenetics on NOAC therapy.

The impact of R353Q genetic polymorphism in coagulation factor VII on the initial anticoagulant effect exerted by warfarin

BACKGROUND

The initial rise in INR following warfarin is attributed to rapid decline in coagulation factor VII (F7). The R353Q polymorphism in F7 accounts for approximately 1/3 of the variability in F7 activity (FVIIc).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the role of R353Q in the initial response to warfarin.

METHODS

Twenty-eight healthy, males, carrying CYP2C9*1/*1 (n = 14), CYP2C9*1/*2 (n = 4) or CYP2C9*1/*3 (n = 10) genotypes, received single 20 mg warfarin. S&R-warfarin concentrations, INR, and FVIIc were monitored periodically for 7 days.

RESULTS

Baseline and maximal INR were 5.6% and 33.5% higher among carriers of the RQ (n = 12) as compared with those carrying the RR (n = 16) genotype (p = 0.032, p = 0.003, respectively). Baseline and nadir FVIIc were 21.6% and 42.0% lower among subjects carrying the RQ as compared with carriers of the RR genotype (p = 0.001, p = 0.007 respectively). In multiple regression analysis, R353Q predicted 36.6% of the variability in peak INR whereas 20.2%, 9.9%, and 5.9% were attributed to VKORC1 genetic polymorphism, cholesterol concentration, and S Warfarin concentration after 24 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

R353Q genetic polymorphism plays a key role in determining the initial response to warfarin. The incorporation of this genetic variant into warfarin loading algorithm should be further investigated.

Creating and validating a warfarin pharmacogenetic dosing algorithm for Colombian patients

Purpose

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant associated with adverse reaction to drugs due to wide inter- and intra-individual dosage variability. Warfarin dosage has been related to non-genetic and genetic factors. CYP2C9 and VKORC1 gene polymorphisms affect warfarin metabolism and dosage. Due to the central role of populations’ ethnical and genetic origin on warfarin dosage variability, novel algorithms for Latin American subgroups are necessary to establish safe anticoagulation therapy.

Patients and methods

We genotyped CYP2C9*2 (c.430C > T), CYP2C9*3 (c.1075A > C), CYP4F2 (c.1297G > A), and VKORC1 (−1639 G > A) polymorphisms in 152 Colombian patients who received warfarin. We evaluated the impact on the variability of patients’ warfarin dose requirements. Multiple linear regression analysis, using genetic and non-genetic variables, was used for creating an algorithm for optimal warfarin maintenance dose.

Results

Median weekly prescribed warfarin dosage was significantly lower in patients having the VKORC1-1639 AA genotype and poor CYP2C9*2/*2,*2/*3 metabolizers than their wild-type counterparts. We found a 2.3-fold increase in mean dose for normal sensitivity patients (wild-type VKORC1/CYP2C9 genotypes) compared to the other groups (moderate and high sensitivity); 31.5% of the patients in our study group had warfarin sensitivity-related genotypes. The estimated regression equation accounted for 44.4% of overall variability in regard to warfarin maintenance dose. The algorithm was validated, giving 45.9% correlation (R²=0.459).

Conclusion

Our results describe and validate the first algorithm for predicting warfarin maintenance in a Colombian mestizo population and have contributed toward the understanding of pharmacogenetics in a Latin American population subgroup.

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Previous trials on the effectiveness of genotype-guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing have been inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing genotype-guided to conventional dosing strategies.

METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched up to 23 October 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 76 and 94 entries were retrieved were retrieved from PubMed and the Cochrane Library, respectively. A total of 2626 subjects in the genotype-guided dosing (mean age 63.3 ± 5.8 years; 46% male) and 2604 subjects in the conventional dosing (mean age 64.7 ± 6.1 years; 46% male) groups (mean follow-up duration 64 days) from 18 trials were included. Compared with conventional dosing, genotype-guided dosing significantly shortened the time to first therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) (mean difference 2.6 days, standard error 0.3 days; P < 0.0001; I2 0%) and time to first stable INR (mean difference 5.9 days, standard error 2.0 days; P < 0.01; I2 94%). Genotype-guided dosing also increased the time in therapeutic range (mean difference 3.1%, standard error 1.2%; P < 0.01; I2 80%) and reduced the risks of both excessive anticoagulation, defined as INR ≥4 [risk ratio (RR) 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78, 0.98; P < 0.05; I2 : 0%), and bleeding (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69, 0.98; P < 0.05; I2 31%). No difference in thromboembolism (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.56, 1.26; P = 0.40; I2 0%) or mortality (RR 1.16; 95% CI 0.46, 2.91; P = 0.76; I2 0%) was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing offers better safety with less bleeding compared with conventional dosing strategies. No significant benefit on thromboembolism or mortality was evident.

CYP2C9 and OATP1B1 genetic polymorphisms affect the metabolism and transport of glimepiride and gliclazide

The therapeutic use of glimepiride and gliclazide shows substantial inter-individual variation in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in human populations, which might be caused by genetic differences among individuals. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of CYP2C9 and OATP1B1 genetic polymorphisms on the metabolism and transport of glimepiride and gliclazide. The uptake of glimepiride and gliclazide was measured in OATP1B1*1a, *5 and *15-HEK293T cells, and their metabolism was measured using CYP2C9*1, *2 and *3 recombinase by LC-MS. Glimepiride in OATP1B1*1a, *5 and *15-HEK293T cells had V_max values of 155 ± 18.7, 80 ± 9.6, and 84.5 ± 8.2 pmol/min/mg, while gliclazide had V_max values of 15.7 ± 4.6, 7.2 ± 2.5, and 8.7 ± 2.4 pmol/min/mg, respectively. The clearance of glimepiride and gliclazide in OATP1B1*5 and *15 was significantly reduced compared to the wild-type. Glimepiride in the presence of CYP2C9*1, *2 and *3 recombinase had V_max values of 21.58 ± 7.78, 15.69 ± 5.59, and 9.17 ± 3.03 nmol/min/mg protein, while gliclazide had V_max values of 15.73 ± 3.11, 10.53 ± 4.06, and 6.21 ± 2.94 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. The clearance of glimepiride and gliclazide in CYP2C9*2 and *3 was significantly reduced compared to the wild-type. These findings collectively indicate that OATP1B1*5 and *15 and CYP2C9*2 and *3 have a significant effect on the transport and metabolism of glimepiride and gliclazide.

Pharmacogenetic studies with oral anticoagulants. Genome-wide association studies in vitamin K antagonist and direct oral anticoagulants

Oral anticoagulants (OAs) are the recommended drugs to prevent cardiovascular events and recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardioembolic stroke. We conducted a literature search to review the current state of OAs pharmacogenomics, focusing on Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAs) in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

VKAs: Warfarin, acenocoumarol, fluindione and phenprocoumon have long been used, but their interindividual variability and narrow therapeutic/safety ratio makes their dosage difficult. GWAs have been useful in finding genetic variants associated with VKAs response. The main genes involved in VKAs pharmacogenetics are: VKORC1, CYP2C19 and CYP4F2. Variants in these genes have been included in pharmacogenetic algorithms to predict the VKAs dose individually in each patient depending on their genotype and clinical variables.

DOACs: Dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban have been approved for patients with AF. They have stable pharmacokinetics and do not require routine blood checks, thus avoiding most of the drawbacks of VKAs. Except for a GWAs performed in patients treated with dabigatran, there is no Genome Wide pharmacogenomics data for DOACs. Pharmacogenomics could be useful to predict the better clinical response and avoid adverse events in patients treated with anticoagulants, identifying the most appropriate anticoagulant drug for each patient. Current pharmacogenomics data show that the polymorphisms affecting VKAs or DOACs are different, concluding that personalized medicine based on pharmacogenomics could be possible. However, more studies are required to implement personalized medicine in clinical practice with OA and based on pharmacogenetics of DOACs.

Genotype-guided warfarin therapy: current status

Warfarin pharmacogenomics has been an extensively studied field in the last decades as it is focused on personalized therapy to overcome the wide interpatient warfarin response variability and decrease the risk of side effects. In this expert review, besides briefly summarizing the current knowledge about warfarin pharmacogenetics, we also present an overview of recent studies that aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and economic issues related to genotype-based dosing algorithms used to guide warfarin therapy, including randomized and controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses and cost-effectiveness studies. To date, the findings still present disparities, mostly because of standard limitations. Thus, further studies should be encouraged to try to demonstrate the benefits of the application of warfarin pharmacogenomic dosing algorithms in clinical practice.

Meta-Analysis of Genotype-Guided Versus Standard Dosing of Vitamin K Antagonists

Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is a commonly prescribed anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic window. Genetic polymorphisms account for high VKA dosage variability. Hence, we performed an updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing genotype-guided VKA versus standard dosing algorithms. We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from inception to October 2017 for all RCTs. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR). Secondary outcomes were international normalized ratio >4, major and all bleeding events, thromboembolism, adverse and serious adverse events, and all-cause mortality. We calculated the weighted mean difference for the primary outcome and risk ratio (RR) for secondary outcomes using a random-effect model. We included 20 RCTs and analyzed a total of 5,980 adult patients. Our pooled analysis showed greater improvement in TTR for the genotype-guided group in comparison with the standard group (mean difference 3.41%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 6.10, p = 0.01). In addition, there were significant reductions in major and all bleeding events ((RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.63, p = 0.0004) and (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.95, p = 0.01), respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the groups for international normalized ratio >4 (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00, p = 0.06), thromboembolism (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.17, p = 0.25), serious adverse events (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.03, p = 0.08), any adverse events (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01, p = 0.07), or all-cause mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.66, p = 0.46). In conclusion, genotype-guided VKA dosing can improve the TTR and reduce the risk for bleeding episodes, in comparison with standard dosing algorithms.

Pharmacogenetics of Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Genetic factors predispose to many ADRs, affecting susceptibility to both type A and type B reactions. The overall contribution of genetics will vary according to drug and ADR, and should be considered when attempting to predict and prevent ADRs. Genetic risk factors are considered in detail for a number of type A ADRs, especially those relating to warfarin and thiopurines, and type B ADRs affecting skin, the liver, and the heart. As the availability of whole genome sequencing increases, it is likely that prospective genotype for particular ADRs prior to drug prescription will become more common in the future. Current examples of genetic testing to prevent ADRs which have already been implemented and future prospects for developments in the field are discussed in detail.

Pharmacogenomics of CYP2C9: Functional and Clinical Considerations

CYP2C9 is the most abundant CYP2C subfamily enzyme in human liver and the most important contributor from this subfamily to drug metabolism. Polymorphisms resulting in decreased enzyme activity are common in the CYP2C9 gene and this, combined with narrow therapeutic indices for several key drug substrates, results in some important issues relating to drug safety and efficacy. CYP2C9 substrate selectivity is detailed and, based on crystal structures for the enzyme, we describe how CYP2C9 catalyzes these reactions. Factors relevant to clinical response to CYP2C9 substrates including inhibition, induction and genetic polymorphism are discussed in detail. In particular, we consider the issue of ethnic variation in pattern and frequency of genetic polymorphisms and clinical implications. Warfarin is the most well studied CYP2C9 substrate; recent work on use of dosing algorithms that include CYP2C9 genotype to improve patient safety during initiation of warfarin dosing are reviewed and prospects for their clinical implementation considered. Finally, we discuss a novel approach to cataloging the functional capabilities of rare 'variants of uncertain significance', which are increasingly detected as more exome and genome sequencing of diverse populations is conducted.

Pharmacogenomics Guided-Personalization of Warfarin and Tamoxifen

The use of pharmacogenomics to personalize drug therapy has been a long-sought goal for warfarin and tamoxifen. However, conflicting evidence has created reason for hesitation in recommending pharmacogenomics-guided care for both drugs. This review will provide a summary of the evidence to date on the association between cytochrome P450 enzymes and the clinical end points of warfarin and tamoxifen therapy. Further, highlighting the clinical experiences that we have gained over the past ten years of running a personalized medicine program, we will offer our perspectives on the utility and the limitations of pharmacogenomics-guided care for warfarin and tamoxifen therapy.

Genotype-guided versus standard vitamin K antagonist dosing algorithms in patients initiating anticoagulation

Variability in vitamin K antagonist (VKA) dosing is partially explained by genetic polymorphisms. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether genotype-guided VKA dosing algorithms decrease a composite of death, thromboembolic events and major bleeding (pri-mary outcome) and improve time in therapeutic range (TTR). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, trial registries and conference proceedings for randomised trials comparing genotype-guided and standard (non genotype-guided) VKA dosing algorithms in adults initiating anticoagulation. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Of the 12 included studies (3,217 patients), six reported all components of the primary outcome of mortality, thromboembolic events and major bleeding (2,223 patients, 87 events). Our meta-analysis found no significant difference between groups for the primary outcome (relative risk 0.85, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.54–1.34; heterogeneity X2=4.46, p=0.35, I2=10 %). Based on 10 studies (2,767 patients), TTR was significantly higher in the genotype-guided group (mean difference (MD) 4.31 %; 95 % CI 0.35, 8.26; heterogeneity X2=43.31, p< 0.001, I2=79 %). Pre-specified exploratory analyses demonstrated that TTR was significantly higher when geno-type-guided dosing was compared with fixed VKA dosing (6 trials, 997 patients: MD 8.41 %; 95 % CI 3.50,13.31; heterogeneity X2=15.18, p=0.01, I2=67 %) but not when compared with clinical algorithm-guided dosing (4 trials, 1,770 patients: MD –0.29 %; 95 % CI –2.48,1.90; heterogeneity X2=1.53, p=0.68, I2=0 %; p for interaction=0.002). In conclusion, genotype-guided compared with standard VKA dosing algorithms were not found to decrease a composite of death, thromboembolism and major bleeding, but did result in improved TTR. An improvement in TTR was observed in comparison with fixed VKA dosing algorithms, but not with clinical algorithms.

Quantitative Assessment of CYP2C9 Genetic Polymorphisms Effect on the Oral Clearance of S-Warfarin in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND

Genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C9 account for 10-20% of the variability in warfarin dose requirement. As such CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms are commonly included in algorithms aimed to optimize warfarin therapy as a way to account for variability in warfarin responsiveness that is due to altered pharmacokinetics. However, most of the currently available pharmacokinetic data were derived from studies among patients on chronic warfarin therapy and therefore suffer from the confounding effects of disease states and drug interactions.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to provide an accurate quantitative estimate of S-warfarin oral clearance (CL_S) among healthy subjects carrying different CYP2C9 genotypes.

METHODS

Single dose of warfarin was administered to 150 non-smokers, age (mean ± SD) 23.3 ± 4.5 years, 60% male, non-obese, healthy subjects. Blood samples were taken for up to 168 h and urine was collected over the entire study period.

RESULTS

Compared with carriers of the wild-type CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype (n = 69), CL_S was reduced by 25, 39 and 47% among heterozygote for CYP2C9*2 (n = 41) CYP2C9*3 (n = 26) and carriers of 2 variant alleles (n = 14), respectively (p < 0.001). The corresponding decrease in the formation clearance of 6 and 7 S-hydroxy-warfarin was 45, 65 and 75%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provides an estimate concerning the effect of CYP2C9 polymorphisms on S-warfarin pharmacokinetics among healthy subjects. As such it is free of the confounding effects of disease states and drug interactions. Further research is needed to evaluate whether the incorporation of quantitative data obtained in the present study into pharmacogenetic warfarin algorithm may enhance its precision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00162474.

The Value of Evidence in the Decision-Making Process for Reimbursement of Pharmacogenetic Dosing of Warfarin

BACKGROUND

After early clinical trials that evaluated pharmacogenetic (PG) algorithms, many healthcare payers were reluctant to cover this technology and, consequently, PG dosing of warfarin could not be translated into clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the value of upgrading evidence relating to PG dosing of warfarin from the healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated PG dosing of warfarin were identified through a systematic literature search, and their findings were combined by a cumulative meta-analysis. A health economic model was used to estimate economic outcomes and to calculate the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) as a measure of the value of clinical trials for decision makers.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were identified and included in our analysis. The estimated difference in the percentage of time in the therapeutic range was 5.6 percentage points in 2007, decreasing to 4.3 percentage points when all studies were included. At a reimbursement price of €160 per PG testing, the EVPI for the clinical benefit was estimated at €80 and €90 per patient in 2007 and 2014, respectively. A reduction in the price of PG testing to €40, which was observed in this period, resulted in an EVPI of €3 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated cumulative effect of PG dosing has remained similar since 2007, but additional evidence has contributed to a more precise estimation. While these variations should not affect the reimbursement decision, a large decline in the cost of PG testing in recent years calls for reconsideration.

Are Evidence Standards Different for Genomic- vs. Clinical-Based Precision Medicine? A Quantitative Analysis of Individualized Warfarin Therapy

Evidence requirements for implementation of precision medicine (PM), whether informed by genomic or clinical data, are not well defined. Evidence requirements are driven by uncertainty and its attendant consequences; these aspects can be quantified by a novel technique in health economics: value of information analysis (VOI). We utilized VOI analysis to compare the evidence levels over time for warfarin dosing based on pharmacogenomic vs. amiodarone-warfarin drug-drug interaction information. The primary outcome was the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), which is an estimate of the upper limit of the societal value of conducting future research. Over the past decade, the EVPI for the pharmacogenomic strategy decreased from $1,550 to $140 vs. $1,220 to $280 per patient for the drug-interaction strategy. Evidence levels thus appear to be higher for pharmacogenomic-guided vs. drug-interaction-guided warfarin dosing. Clinical guidelines and reimbursement policies for warfarin PM could be informed by these findings.

The use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays in goal-directing treatment with allogeneic blood products - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Management of the critically bleeding patient can be encountered in many medical and surgical settings. Common for these patients is a high risk of dying from exsanguination secondary to developing coagulopathy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically review and assess randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed on patients in acute need for blood transfusions due to bleeding to evaluate the effect of viscoelastic haemostatic assay (VHA) guidance on bleeding, transfusion requirements and mortality.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched for RCTs that 1) randomised patients into receiving transfusions based on either a VHA-guided (thromboelastography [TEG] or rotational thromboelastometry [ROTEM]) algorithm (intervention group) or at the clinician's discretion and/or based on conventional coagulation tests (control group) and 2) adequately reported on the outcomes bleeding and/or transfusions and/or mortality. Data on bleeding, transfusions and mortality were extracted from each trial and included in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs (n = 1238 patients) were included. Nine trials referred to cardiothoracic patients, one to liver transplantation, one to surgical excision of burn wounds and one to trauma. One trial was conducted with cirrhotic patients, one with patients undergoing scoliosis surgery while one trial randomised treatment in post-partum females presenting with bleeding. The amount of transfused red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and bleeding volume was found to be significantly reduced in the VHA-guided groups, whereas no significant difference was found for platelet transfusion requirements or mortality.

Genetic Polymorphisms and in Vitro Functional Characterization of CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 Allelic Variants

Genetic variations in CYP 2C (CYP2C) subfamily, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 contribute to interindividual variability in the metabolism of clinically used drugs. Changes in the drug metabolizing activity of CYP2C members may cause unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions and inadequate therapeutic effects. Therefore, CYP2C gene polymorphism is used as a genome biomarker for predicting responsiveness to administered drugs. The most direct method for understanding the extent of the effects of CYP2C gene polymorphism on drug pharmacokinetics is by evaluating the blood and urine concentrations of the drug in subjects. However, in vivo tests are highly invasive, and considering the risk of adverse drug reactions, the burden on the patient may be significant. In addition, examining the functions of rare variant enzymes with an allele frequency of ≤1% requires at least several hundred subjects. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to evaluate the functions of all variant enzymes in an in vivo test. On the other hand, in vitro enzyme activity can be evaluated using a heterologous expression system to avoid the aforementioned problems. In vitro tests are extremely important as they complement in vivo information. This review focuses on recent findings of in vitro studies on 3 highly polymorphic CYP2C members: CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19.

Use of Pharmacogenetic Information in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

In 1964, Robert A. O'Reilly's research group identified members of a family who required remarkably high warfarin doses (up to 145 mg/day, 20 times the average dose) to achieve appropriate anticoagulation. Since this time, pharmacogenetics has become a mainstay of cardiovascular science, and genetic variants have been implicated in several fundamental classes of medications used in cardiovascular medicine.

CONTENT

In this review, we discuss genetic variants that affect drug response to 3 classes of cardiovascular drugs: statins, platelet P2Y12 inhibitors, and anticoagulants. These genetic variations have pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects and have been shown to explain differences in drug response such as lipid lowering, prevention of cardiovascular disease, and prevention of stroke, as well as incidence of adverse events such as musculoskeletal side effects and bleeding. Several groups have begun to implement pharmacogenetics testing as part of routine clinical care with the goal of improving health outcomes. Such strategies identify both patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes and alternative strategies to mitigate this risk as well as patients with “normal” genotypes, who, armed with this information, may have increased confidence and adherence to prescribed medications. While much is known about the genetic variants that underlie these effects, translation of this knowledge into clinical practice has been hampered by difficulty in implementing cost-effective, point-of-care tools to improve physician decision-making as well as a lack of data, as of yet, demonstrating the efficacy of using genetic information to improve health.

SUMMARY

Many genetic variants that affect individual responses to drugs used in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment have been described. Further study of these variants is needed before successful implementation into clinical practice.

Genetic polymorphisms of patients on stable warfarin maintenance therapy in a Ghanaian population

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is a widely prescribed anticoagulant with narrow therapeutic window for thromboembolic events. Warfarin displays large individual variability in dose requirements. The purpose of this study is to assess the contribution of patient-specific and genetic risk factors to dose requirements of patients on either high or low warfarin maintenance dose in Ghana. Blood samples were collected from 141 (62 males, 79 females) Ghanaian patients on stable warfarin dose to determine their INR. Influence of patient specific factors and gene variations within VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2 were determined in patients on either high or low warfarin maintenance dose.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one patients took part in the study with 79 (56%) participants being Female. The median age of the study participants was 48 years [IQR: 34-58]. The median duration for patients to be on warfarin therapy was 24 months [IQR: 10-72]. Majority of the study participants (80.9%, n = 114) did not have any side effects to warfarin. CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 variant alleles were not detected. VKORC1 variant allele was observed at 6% and CYP4F2 variant allele was observed at 41%. Duration of patients on warfarin therapy was marginally associated with high warfarin dose (adjusted OR = 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.02], p = 0.033) while the odds of heterozygous individuals (G/A) for VKORC1 gene to have high warfarin dose compared to persons with homozygous (G/G) (adjusted OR = 0.06 [95% CI 0.01-0.63], p = 0.019). Age, gender, diagnosis, presence of side effects and other medications were not associated with warfarin dose (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study provides data on VKORC1 and CYP4F2 variants among an indigenous African population. Duration of patients on warfarin therapy was marginally associated with high warfarin dose. CYP2C9*2 and *3 variants were not detected and may not be the most important genetic factor for warfarin maintenance dose among Ghanaians.

Influence of Genotype on Warfarin Maintenance Dose Predictions Produced Using a Bayesian Dose Individualization Tool

BACKGROUND

A previously established Bayesian dosing tool for warfarin was found to produce biased maintenance dose predictions. In this study, we aimed (1) to determine whether the biased warfarin dose predictions previously observed could be replicated in a new cohort of patients from 2 different clinical settings, (2) to explore the influence of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype on predictive performance of the Bayesian dosing tool, and (3) to determine whether the previous population used to develop the kinetic-pharmacodynamic model underpinning the Bayesian dosing tool was sufficiently different from the test (posterior) population to account for the biased dose predictions.

METHODS

The warfarin maintenance doses for 140 patients were predicted using the dosing tool and compared with the observed maintenance dose. The impact of genotype was assessed by predicting maintenance doses with prior parameter values known to be altered by genetic variability (eg, EC50 for VKORC1 genotype). The prior population was evaluated by fitting the published kinetic-pharmacodynamic model, which underpins the Bayesian tool, to the observed data using NONMEM and comparing the model parameter estimates with published values.

RESULTS

The Bayesian tool produced positively biased dose predictions in the new cohort of patients (mean prediction error [95% confidence interval]; 0.32 mg/d [0.14-0.5]). The bias was only observed in patients requiring ≥7 mg/d. The direction and magnitude of the observed bias was not influenced by genotype. The prior model provided a good fit to our data, which suggests that the bias was not caused by different prior and posterior populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance doses for patients requiring ≥7 mg/d were overpredicted. The bias was not due to the influence of genotype nor was it related to differences between the prior and posterior populations. There is a need for a more mechanistic model that captures warfarin dose-response relationship at higher warfarin doses.

An expanded pharmacogenomics warfarin dosing table with utility in generalised dosing guidance

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) guided warfarin dosing, using a comprehensive dosing algorithm, is expected to improve dose optimisation and lower the risk of adverse drug reactions. As a complementary tool, a simple genotype-dosing table, such as in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Coumadin drug label, may be utilised for general risk assessment of likely over- or under-anticoagulation on a standard dose of warfarin. This tool may be used as part of the clinical decision support for the interpretation of genetic data, serving as a first step in the anticoagulation therapy decision making process. Here we used a publicly available warfarin dosing calculator (www.warfarindosing.org) to create an expanded gene-based warfarin dosing table, the CPMC-WD table that includes nine genetic variants in CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2. Using two datasets, a European American cohort (EUA, n=73) and the Quebec Warfarin Cohort (QWC, n=769), we show that the CPMC-WD table more accurately predicts therapeutic dose than the FDA table (51 % vs 33 %, respectively, in the EUA, McNemar's two-sided p=0.02; 52 % vs 37 % in the QWC, p<1×10(-6)). It also outperforms both the standard of care 5 mg/day dosing (51 % vs 34 % in the EUA, p=0.04; 52 % vs 31 % in the QWC, p<1×10(-6)) as well as a clinical-only algorithm (51 % vs 38 % in the EUA, trend p=0.11; 52 % vs 45 % in the QWC, p=0.003). This table offers a valuable update to the PGx dosing guideline in the drug label.

Frequency of Common CYP2C9 Polymorphisms and Their Impact on Warfarin Dose Requirement in Pakistani Population

Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 (CYP2C9) gene result in interindividual variability in warfarin dose requirement. There is a need for characterization of genotype frequency distribution in different populations for construction of customized dosing algorithms to enhance the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of warfarin therapy. This study was carried out in Pakistani population to evaluate the contribution of common CYP2C9 polymorphisms to warfarin therapy. A total of 550 stable patients taking warfarin were enrolled after medical history, physical examination, and laboratory investigations. Single blood sample was collected after informed consent. Genomic DNA was extracted, and genotype analysis for CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 polymorphisms was done by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. A number of samples were also analyzed by direct DNA sequencing for validation of the results. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Genotype frequency distribution of CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 was found to be different from other populations. Of these 2 polymorphisms, CYP2C9*2 did not demonstrate significant effect on warfarin dose requirement, whereas CYP2C9*3 did show significant effect ( P value = .012). It is concluded that there is a need to study genotype frequency distribution and their effect on warfarin dose variability among different populations due to diversity in outcome.

Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Reevaluated: Subgroup Analysis Reveals a Likely Underestimation of the Maximum Pharmacogenetic Benefit by Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES

Various patient subgroups were examined to determine which ones obtain the largest pharmacogenetic improvements in warfarin dose accuracy. Subgrouping schemes of recent clinical trials were analyzed for comparison.

METHODS

The accuracy of a pharmacogenetic dose algorithm was determined retrospectively in comparison to that of a clinical algorithm in subgroups of the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) patient database (n = 2,274) and of newly studied clinic patients (n = 146).

RESULTS

White patients with low-dose genotypes (*1*3/AA, *2*2/AA, *2*3/GA, *2*3/AA, *3*3/GG, *3*3/GA, and *3*3/AA) achieved the largest pharmacogenetic improvements in warfarin dose accuracy. Mean absolute dosing error (MAE) in this subgroup of IWPC and newly studied patients was reduced 75.7% and 89.7%, respectively. White IWPC patients with >2 variants or ≥2 mg/day absolute difference between pharmacogenetic and clinical dose predictions obtained MAE reductions of 71.1% and 65.3%, respectively. By comparison, unstratified populations and subgroups of a major clinical trial, when replicated in IWPC patients, obtained smaller MAE reductions of 31.8% to 48.2%. Blacks and Asians obtained substantially smaller dose accuracy improvements overall than whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient subgroups were identified that obtained the largest pharmacogenetic improvements in warfarin dose accuracy. These subgroups have not been analyzed in clinical trials to date, likely resulting in underestimation of the pharmacogenetic benefit.

Development and Comparison of Warfarin Dosing Algorithms in Stroke Patients

PURPOSE

The genes for cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) have been identified as important genetic determinants of warfarin dosing and have been studied. We developed warfarin algorithm for Korean patients with stroke and compared the accuracy of warfarin dose prediction algorithms based on the pharmacogenetics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 101 patients on stable maintenance dose of warfarin were enrolled. Warfarin dosing algorithm was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. The performance of all the algorithms was characterized with coefficient of determination, determined by linear regression, and the mean of percent deviation was used to predict doses from the actual dose. In addition, we compared the performance of the algorithms using percentage of predicted dose falling within ±20% of clinically observed doses and dividing the patients into a low-dose group (≤3 mg/day), an intermediate-dose group (3-7 mg/day), and high-dose group (≥7 mg/day).

RESULTS

A new developed algorithms including the variables of age, body weight, and CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype. Our algorithm accounted for 51% of variation in the warfarin stable dose, and performed best in predicting dose within 20% of actual dose and intermediate-dose group.

CONCLUSION

Our warfarin dosing algorithm may be useful for Korean patients with stroke. Further studies to elucidate clinical utility of genotype-guided dosing and find the additional genetic association are necessary.

Prevalence of Warfarin Genotype Polymorphisms in Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support

Polymorphisms for VKORC1 and CYP2C9 are associated with increased warfarin sensitivity. The prevalence of these polymorphisms in patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is unknown. Polymorphisms for VKORC1 and CYP2C9 were determined in 65 patients undergoing MCS surgery. Postoperative warfarin dose, international normalized ratio (INR), and bleeding events were measured until discharge, 6 months, or composite end point (in-hospital MCS recovery, heart transplant, or death). A total of 67.7% (44/65) had at least one polymorphism: VKORC1 (44.6%), CYP2C9*2 (7.7%), CYP2C9*3 (4.6%), CYP2C9*2 and VKORC1 (3.1%), or CYP2C9*3 and VKORC1 (7.7%). At discharge or before composite end point, patients with any polymorphism received a lower mean warfarin dosage than patients having no polymorphism (3.21 ± 1.47 vs. 5.57 ± 3.72 mg, p = 0.015) and achieved a similar mean INR (2.20 ± 0.67 vs. 2.19 ± 0.69, p = 0.96). There was no significant difference in bleeding rates within 6 months or before composite end point (6.13 vs. 8.02 events/patient-year, p = 0.13). One or more polymorphisms for VKORC1 or CYP2C9 (associated with warfarin sensitivity) were found in 67.7% of MCS patients. By using a warfarin genotype-guided approach, MCS patients with polymorphisms received a lower warfarin dosage to achieve a similar INR, with similar bleeding rates, in comparison with no polymorphisms. A warfarin genotype-guided approach avoided excessive anticoagulation and its attendant bleeding risks.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals an improved clinical outcome of using genotype plus clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing

Previous studies have raised interest in using the genotyping of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 to guide warfarin dosing. However, there is lack of solid evidence to prove that genotype plus clinical algorithm provides improved clinical outcomes than the single clinical algorithm. The results of recent reported clinical trials are paradoxical and needs to be systematically evaluated. In this study, we aim to assess whether genotype plus clinical algorithm of warfarin is superior to the single clinical algorithm through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All relevant studies from PubMed and reference lists from Jan 1, 1995 to Jan 13, 2014 were extracted and screened. Eligible studies included randomized trials that compared clinical plus pharmacogenetic algorithms group to single clinical algorithm group using adult (≥ 18 years) patients with disease conditions that require warfarin use. We further used fix-effect models to calculate the mean difference or the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs to analyze the extracted data. The statistical heterogeneity was calculated using I(2). The percentage of time within the therapeutic INR range was considered to be the primary clinical outcome. The initial search strategy identified 50 citations and 7 trials were eligible. These seven trials included 1,910 participants, including 960 patients who received genotype plus clinical algorithm of warfarin dosing and 950 patients who received clinical algorithm only. We discovered that the percentage of time within the therapeutic INR range of the genotype-guided group was improved compared with the standard group in the RCTs when the initial standard dose was fixed (95% CI 0.09-0.40; I(2) = 47.8%). However, for the studies using non-fixed initial doses, the genotype-guided group failed to exhibit statistically significant outcome compared to the standard group. No significant difference was observed in the incidences of adverse events (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.04; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.647) and death rates (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.46-4.05; I(2) = 10.4%, p = 0.328) between the two groups. Allocation to genotype plus clinical algorithm may be associated with a significant improvement of the percentage of time within the therapeutic INR range for patients adopting fixed dose of warfarin. The incidence of total adverse events and death rates did not differ between these two groups. Further experiments need to be conducted to confirm these findings.

Pharmacometabolomics-aided Pharmacogenomics in Autoimmune Disease

Inter-individual variability has been a major hurdle to optimize disease management. Precision medicine holds promise for improving health and healthcare via tailor-made therapeutic strategies. Herein, we outline the paradigm of "pharmacometabolomics-aided pharmacogenomics" in autoimmune diseases. We envisage merging pharmacometabolomic and pharmacogenomic data (to address the interplay of genomic and environmental influences) with information technologies to facilitate data analysis as well as sense- and decision-making on the basis of synergy between artificial and human intelligence. Humans can detect patterns, which computer algorithms may fail to do so, whereas data-intensive and cognitively complex settings and processes limit human ability. We propose that better-informed, rapid and cost-effective omics studies need the implementation of holistic and multidisciplinary approaches.