Regulated expression of TATA-binding protein-related factor 3 (TRF3) during early embryogenesis

Functional divergence of TBP homologs through distinct DNA-binding dynamics

The TATA box-binding protein (TBP) is an evolutionarily conserved basal transcription factor common in the pre-initiation complex of all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases (RNA Pols). Despite their high conservation, homologous TBPs exhibit species- and tissue-specific functions that may contribute to the increasingly complex gene expression regulation across evolutionary time. To determine the molecular mechanisms of species- and tissue-specificity for homologous TBPs, we examined the ability of yeast TBP and murine TBP paralogs to replace the endogenous TBP in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). We show that, despite the high conservation in the DNA-binding domain among the homologs, they cannot fully rescue the lethality of TBP depletion in mESCs, which correlates with their inability to support RNA Pol III transcription. Furthermore, we show that the homologs differentially support stress-induced transcription reprogramming, with the divergent N-terminal domain playing a role in modulating changes in transcriptional response. Lastly, we show that the homologs have vastly different DNA binding dynamics, suggesting a potential mechanism for the distinct functional behavior observed among the homologs. Taken together, these data show a remarkable balance between flexibility and essentiality for the different functions of homologous TBP in eukaryotic transcription.

The highly diverse TATA box-binding proteins among protists: A review

Transcription is the first step of gene expression regulation and is a fundamental mechanism for establishing the viability and development of a cell. The TATA box-binding protein (TBP) interaction with a TATA box in a promoter is one of the best studied mechanisms in transcription initiation. TBP is a transcription factor that is highly conserved from archaea to humans and is essential for the transcription initiated by each of the three RNA polymerases. In addition, the discovery of TBP-related factor 1 (TRF1) and other factors related to TBP shed light on the variability among transcription initiation complexes, thus demonstrating that the compositions of these complexes are, in fact, more complicated than originally believed. Despite these facts, the majority of studies on transcription have been performed on animal, plant and fungal cells, which serve as canonical models, and information regarding protist cells is relatively scarce. The aim of this work is to review the diversity of the TBPs that have been documented in protists and describe some of the specific features that differentiate them from their counterparts in higher eukaryotes.

TATA box-binding protein-related factor 3 drives the mesendoderm specification of human embryonic stem cells by globally interacting with the TATA box of key mesendodermal genes

BACKGROUND

Mesendodermal formation during early gastrulation requires the expression of lineage-specific genes, while the regulatory mechanisms during this process have not yet been fully illustrated. TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-like factors are general transcription factors responsible for the transcription initiation by recruiting the preinitiation complex to promoter regions. However, the role of TBP family members in the regulation of mesendodermal specification remains largely unknown.

METHODS

We used an in vitro mesendodermal differentiation system of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), combining with the microarray and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis, loss of function and gain of function to determine the function of the TBP family member TBP-related factor 3 (TRF3) during mesendodermal differentiation of hESCs. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and biochemistry analysis were used to determine the binding of TRF3 to the promoter region of key mesendodermal genes.

RESULTS

The mesendodermal differentiation of hESCs was confirmed by the microarray gene expression profile, qRT-PCR, and immunocytochemical staining. The expression of TRF3 mRNA was enhanced during mesendodermal differentiation of hESCs. The TRF3 deficiency did not affect the pluripotent marker expression, alkaline phosphatase activity, and cell cycle distribution of undifferentiated hESCs or the expression of early neuroectodermal genes during neuroectodermal differentiation. During the mesendodermal differentiation, the expression of pluripotency markers decreased in both wild-type and TRF3 knockout (TRF3^-/-) cells, while the TRF3 deficiency crippled the expression of the mesendodermal markers. The reintroduction of TRF3 into the TRF3^-/- hESCs rescued inhibited mesendodermal differentiation. Mechanistically, the TRF3 binding profile was significantly shifted to the mesendodermal specification during mesendodermal differentiation of hESCs based on the ChIP-seq data. Moreover, ChIP and ChIP-qPCR analysis showed that TRF3 was enriched at core promoter regions of mesendodermal developmental genes, EOMESODERMIN, BRACHYURY, mix paired-like homeobox, and GOOSECOID homeobox, during mesendodermal differentiation of hESCs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reveal that the TBP family member TRF3 is dispensable in the undifferentiated hESCs and the early neuroectodermal differentiation. However, it directs mesendodermal lineage commitment of hESCs via specifically promoting the transcription of key mesendodermal transcription factors. These findings provide new insights into the function and mechanisms of the TBP family member in hESC early lineage specification.

TBP-related factors: a paradigm of diversity in transcription initiation

TATA binding protein (TBP) is a key component of the eukaryotic transcription initiation machinery. It functions in several complexes involved in core promoter recognition and assembly of the pre-initiation complex. Through gene duplication eukaryotes have expanded their repertoire of TATA binding proteins, leading to a variable composition of the transcription machinery. In vertebrates this repertoire consists of TBP, TBP-like factor (TLF, also known as TBPL1, TRF2) and TBP2 (also known as TBPL2, TRF3). All three factors are essential, with TLF and TBP2 playing important roles in development and differentiation, in particular gametogenesis and early embryonic development, whereas TBP dominates somatic cell transcription. TBP-related factors may compete for promoters when co-expressed, but also show preferential interactions with subsets of promoters. Initiation factor switching occurs on account of differential expression of these proteins in gametes, embryos and somatic cells. Paralogs of TFIIA and TAF subunits account for additional variation in the transcription initiation complex. This variation in core promoter recognition accommodates the expanded regulatory capacity and specificity required for germ cells and embryonic development in higher eukaryotes.

Promoting developmental transcription

Animal growth and development depend on the precise control of gene expression at the level of transcription. A central role in the regulation of developmental transcription is attributed to transcription factors that bind DNA enhancer elements, which are often located far from gene transcription start sites. Here, we review recent studies that have uncovered significant regulatory functions in developmental transcription for the TFIID basal transcription factors and for the DNA core promoter elements that are located close to transcription start sites.

Shifting players and paradigms in cell-specific transcription

Historically, developmental-stage- and tissue-specific patterns of gene expression were assumed to be determined primarily by DNA regulatory sequences and their associated activators, while the general transcription machinery including core promoter recognition complexes, coactivators, and chromatin modifiers was held to be invariant. New evidence suggests that significant changes in these general transcription factors including TFIID, BAF, and Mediator may facilitate global changes in cell-type-specific transcription.

Spatiotemporal expression of transcriptional regulators in concert with the maternal-to-embryonic transition during bovine in vitro embryogenesis

Cleavage-stage bovine embryos are transcriptionally quiescent until they reach the 8- to 16-cell stage, and thus rely on the reserves provided by the stored maternal mRNAs and proteins found in the oocytes to achieve their first cell divisions. The objective of this study was to characterize the expression and localization of the transcriptional and translational regulators, Y box binding protein 2 (YBX2), TATA box-binding protein (TBP), and activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2), during bovine early embryo development. Germinal vesicle (GV)- and metaphase II (MII)-stage oocytes, as well as 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-cell-stage embryos, morula, and blastocysts, producedin vitrowere analyzed for temporal and spatial protein expression. Using Q-PCR,ATF2mRNA expression was shown to remain constant from the GV-stage oocyte to the four-cell embryo, and then decreased through to the blastocyst stage. By contrast, the protein levels of ATF2 remained constant throughout embryo development and were found in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Both TBP and YBX2 showed opposite protein expression patterns, as YBX2 protein levels decreased throughout development, while TBP levels increased through to the blastocyst stage. Immunolocalization studies revealed that TBP protein was localized in the nucleus of 8- to 16-cell-stage embryos, whereas the translational regulator YBX2 was exclusively cytoplasmic and disappeared from the 16-cell stage onward. This study shows that YBX2, TBP, and ATF2 are differentially regulated through embryo development, and provides insight into the molecular events occurring during the activation of the bovine genome during embryo developmentin vitro.

Analysis of TATA-binding protein 2 (TBP2) and TBP expression suggests different roles for the two proteins in regulation of gene expression during oogenesis and early mouse development

Gametogenesis, the process during which germ cells are generated is essential for reproduction. In mammals, maternal mRNA and proteins present in the oocyte are required to ensure the progression of development until the embryo activates its genome after fertilisation. It is well established that the oocyte synthesises these maternal factors during oocyte growth and then undergoes a quiescent transcriptional period that will be resumed only after fertilisation. However, the mechanisms that govern transcriptional regulation and subsequent silencing during oogenesis are not well understood. Here, we have examined the expression and localisation of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the related protein TBP2 (also called TRF3, TBP-related factor 3) during oogenesis and in early mouse embryos. We show that TBP is expressed in the oocytes at the beginning of folliculogenesis, but it is undetectable during further stages of oocyte development, and becomes abundant again only after fertilisation. In contrast to TBP, we found that TBP2 is highly expressed in growing oocytes during folliculogenesis, declines upon ovulation, and is almost undetectable after fertilisation by the two-cell stage. The mirroring localisation profile of TBP and TBP2 suggests different roles for the two proteins in establishing specialised programs of gene expression during oocyte development and in early mouse embryos. Analysis of mutant mouse ovaries in which oocyte-specific factors have been knocked-out suggests that TBP2 is a potential candidate for regulating transcriptional control of oogenesis. Moreover, our results obtained with oocytes lacking the oocyte-specific nuclear chaperone nucleoplasmin 2 suggest that TBP2 function may be related to non-condensed chromatin conformation.

Switching of the core transcription machinery during myogenesis

Transcriptional mechanisms that govern cellular differentiation typically include sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins and chromatin-modifying activities. These regulatory factors are assumed necessary and sufficient to drive both divergent programs of proliferation and terminal differentiation. By contrast, potential contributions of the basal transcriptional apparatus to orchestrate cell-specific gene expression have been poorly explored. In order to probe alternative mechanisms that control differentiation, we have assessed the fate of the core promoter recognition complex, TFIID, during skeletal myogenesis. Here we report that differentiation of myoblast to myotubes involves the disruption of the canonical holo-TFIID and replacement by a novel TRF3/TAF3 (TBP-related factor 3/TATA-binding protein-associated factor 3) complex. This required switching of core promoter complexes provides organisms a simple yet effective means to selectively turn on one transcriptional program while silencing many others. Although this drastic but parsimonious transcriptional switch had previously escaped our attention, it may represent a more general mechanism for regulating cell type-specific terminal differentiation.

Nuclear reprogramming: the zygotic transcription program is established through an “erase-and-rebuild” strategy

Oocytes display a maternal-specific gene expression profile, which is switched to a zygotic profile when a haploid set of chromatin is passed on to the fertilized egg that develops into an embryo. The mechanism underlying this transcription reprogramming is currently unknown. Here we demonstrate that by the time when transcription is shut down in germinal vesicle oocytes, a range of general transcription factors and transcriptional regulators are dissociated from the chromatin. The global dissociation of chromatin factors (CFs) disrupts physical contacts between the chromatin and CFs and leads to erasure of the maternal transcription program at the functional level. Critical transcription factors and regulators remain separated from chromatin for a prolonged period, and become re-associated with chromatin shortly after pronuclear formation. This is followed temporally by the re-establishment of nuclear functions such as DNA replication and transcription. We propose that the maternal transcription program is erased during oogenesis to generate a relatively naïve chromatin and the zygotic transcription program is rebuilt de novo after fertilization. This process is termed as the "erase-and-rebuild" process, which is used to reset the transcription program, and most likely other nuclear processes as well, from a maternal one to that of the embryo. We further show in the accompanying paper (Gao T, et al., Cell Res 2007; 17: 135-150.) that the same strategy is also employed to reprogram transcriptional profiles in somatic cell nuclear transfer and parthenogenesis, suggesting that this model is universally applicable to all forms of transcriptional reprogramming during early embryogenesis. Displacement of CFs from chromatin also offers an explanation for the phenomenon of transcription silence during the maternal to zygotic transition.