Maternal uniparental isodisomy 20 in a foetus with trisomy 20 mosaicism: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular analysis

Low-level mosaic trisomy 20 without uniparental disomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable outcome, cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line

OBJECTIVE

We present low-level mosaic trisomy 20 without uniparental disomy (UPD) 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable outcome, cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

CASE REPORT

A 36-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+20[3]/46,XY[17]. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1-22) × 2, X × 1, Y × 1 with no genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 23 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis was performed. Cytogenetic analysis of the cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+20[1]/46,XY[27]. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes by SurePrint G3 Unrestricted CGH ISCA v2, 8 × 60 K (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) revealed the result of arr (1-22) × 2, X × 1, Y × 1. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays on the DNAs extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded UPD 20. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a healthy 3750-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY (40/40 cells).

CONCLUSION

Low-level mosaic trisomy 20 without UPD 20 at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable outcome. Progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line can occur in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis. Low-level mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition.

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present our observation of cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 35-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[10]/46,XX[15]. Among 25 colonies of cultured amniocytes, 10 colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20, while the rest were normal. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1-22,X) × 2. The parental karyotypes were normal. Following genetic counseling, the woman underwent repeat amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation. Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[3]/46,XX[35]. Among 38 colonies of cultured amniocytes, three colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20, while the rest were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1-22,X) × 2. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on 101 uncultured amniocytes detected only one cell with three chromosome 20 signals with a mosaic trisomy 20 level of 1% (1/101 cells), compared with 0% in normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 20. At 38 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal 3120-g female baby was delivered. Cytogenetic analysis of cord blood, placental tissue and umbilical cord revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. The neonate was normal at postnatal follow-ups. Postnatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells revealed no trisomy 20 signals.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis can be a cultured artifact. Complete cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis, and molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid distinguishing true mosaicism from pseudomosaicism under such as circumstance.

Additional Evidence for Neuropsychiatric Manifestations in Mosaic Trisomy 20: A Case Report and Brief Review

Mosaic trisomy 20 is a genetic condition in which three chromosomes 20 are found in some cells. Its clinical phenotype seems to be highly variable, with most features not reported across all individuals and not considered pathognomonic of the condition. Limited and recent evidence indicates that neuropsychiatric manifestations may be more present in the context of trisomy 20 than was once thought. Here, we present a case of a 14-year-old female adolescent of White/Caucasian ethnicity with mosaic trisomy 20, who was admitted twice to an inpatient Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit for persisting self-injury and suicidal ideation. A severe and complex neuropsychiatric presentation emerged at the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral levels, including mild neurodevelopmental issues, isolation, socio-relational difficulties, depressed mood, temper outbursts, irritability, low self-esteem, lack of interest, social anxiety, panic attacks, self-cutting, and low-average-range and heterogeneous intelligence quotient profile. Particularly, the patient was considered at high risk of causing harm, mainly to self, and appeared to be only partially responsive to medication, even when polypharmacy was attempted to improve clinical response. Except for school bullying, no other severe environmental risk factors were present in the patient’s history. The patient received a diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder.

Maternal Uniparental Disomy of Chromosome 20 (UPD(20)mat) as Differential Diagnosis of Silver Russell Syndrome: Identification of Three New Cases

Silver Russell Syndrome (SRS, MIM #180860) is a rare growth retardation disorder in which clinical diagnosis is based on six features: pre- and postnatal growth failure, relative macrocephaly, prominent forehead, body asymmetry, and feeding difficulties (Netchine–Harbison clinical scoring system (NH-CSS)). The molecular mechanisms consist in (epi)genetic deregulations at multiple loci: the loss of methylation (LOM) at the paternal H19/IGF2:IG-DMR (chr11p15.5) (50%) and the maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 (UPD(7)mat) (10%) are the most frequent causes. Thus far, about 40% of SRS remains undiagnosed, pointing to the need to define the rare mechanisms in such a consistent fraction of unsolved patients. Within a cohort of 176 SRS with an NH-CSS ≥ 3, a molecular diagnosis was disclosed in about 45%. Among the remaining patients, we identified in 3 probands (1.7%) with UPD(20)mat (Mulchandani–Bhoj–Conlin syndrome, OMIM #617352), a molecular mechanism deregulating the GNAS locus and described in 21 cases, characterized by severe feeding difficulties associated with failure to thrive, preterm birth, and intrauterine/postnatal growth retardation. Our patients share prominent forehead, feeding difficulties, postnatal growth delay, and advanced maternal age. Their clinical assessment and molecular diagnostic flowchart contribute to better define the characteristics of this rare imprinting disorder and to rank UPD(20)mat as the fourth most common pathogenic molecular defect causative of SRS.

Prenatal diagnosis of low-level mosaic trisomy 20 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of low-level mosaic trisomy 20 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 35-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[8]/46,XX[23]. The parental karyotypes were normal, and prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. Repeat amniocentesis performed at 20 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[2]/46,XX[19]. Simultaneous molecular cytogenetic tests using uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis and a mosaic level of 14.3% (15/105 cells) in interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis using the DNAs extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 20. At 39 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal 3580-g female baby was delivered without any structural abnormality. The neonate was doing well at age two years during postnatal follow-ups. Her psychomotor development was normal. Interphase FISH analysis of urinary cells revealed no trisomy 20 signals in 45/45 urinary cells. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XX in 40/40 lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

Fetuses with low-level mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis can have a favorable outcome. Molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes is useful for confirmatory diagnosis of the mosaic level in case of mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis with different mosaic levels at different amniocenteses.

Mosaic trisomy 20 and mitigation in capital crimes sentencing: A review and case report

Trisomy 20 is a genetic abnormality in which individuals have an extra copy of chromosome 20. Complete trisomy 20 is rare and believed to be incompatible with life. A mosaic form of trisomy 20, in which only some cells or tissues contain the extra chromosome, is a relatively commonly encountered chromosomal abnormality found during prenatal testing, and c. 90% result in a normal phenotype. However, despite the absence of a consistent phenotype, certain findings have been reported across multiple cases of mosaic trisomy 20. These include an array of morphological findings, developmental delays, and learning disabilities. Beyond physical manifestations, a wide range of developmental and learning delays have also been reported. In this work, we provide an overview of the trisomy 20 literature and a case report of a young adult male with mosaic trisomy 20 who committed homicide. His developmental and life history, eventual diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 20, similarities and differences in his condition compared with prior research findings, and potentially new phenotypic findings associated with trisomy 20 that he manifested (childhood visual hallucinations, self-injury, polydactyly) are presented. Additionally, the potential role of this genetic diagnosis in his neuropsychiatric history and its successful application as a mitigating factor at his capital sentencing trial are described. We did not identify other similar cases during our search of major scientific and legal databases. As a backdrop, the use of genetics in criminal trials is on the rise, and courts are increasingly likely to accept behavioral genetics evidence; therefore, it is crucial that the legal system is well acquainted with the opportunities and limitations of these approaches.

High frequency of paternal iso or heterodisomy at chromosome 20 associated with sporadic pseudohypoparathyroidism 1B

Pseudohypoparathyroidism 1B (PHP1B) is caused by maternal epigenetic defects in the imprinted GNAS cluster. PHP1B can follow an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance or occur sporadically (spor-PHP1B). These latter patients present broad methylation changes of two or more differentially methylated regions (DMR) that, when mimicking the paternal allele, raises the suspicious of the occurrence of paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20 (upd(20)pat). A cohort of 33 spor-PHP1B patients was screened for upd(20)pat using comparative genomic hybridization with SNP-chip. Methylation analyses were assessed by methylation specific-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Upd(20)pat was identified in 6 patients, all exhibiting typical paternal methylation pattern compared to normal controls, namely a complete loss of methylation of GNAS A/B:TSS-DMR, negligible methylation at GNAS-AS1:TSS-DMR and GNAS-XL:Ex1-DMR and complete gain of methylation at GNAS-NESP:TSS-DMR. The overall frequency of upd(20) is 18% in our cohort when searched considering both severe and partial loss of imprinting. However, twenty five patients displayed severe methylation pattern and the upd(20)pat frequency reaches 24% when searching in this group. Consequently, up to day, upd(20)pat is the most common anomaly than other genetic alterations in spor-PHP1B patients. Upd(20)pat occurrence is not linked to the parental age in contrast to upd(20)mat, strongly associated with an advanced maternal childbearing age. This study provides criteria to guide further investigations for upd(20)pat needed for an adequate genetic counseling.

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20: a novel imprinting disorder of growth failure

PURPOSE

Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20 (UPD(20)mat) has been reported in only four patients, three of whom also had mosaicism for complete or partial trisomy of chromosome 20. We sought to evaluate the clinical significance of isolated UPD(20)mat in eight individuals.

METHODS

We evaluated phenotypic and genomic findings of a series of eight new patients with UPD(20)mat.

RESULTS

All eight individuals with UPD(20)mat had intrauterine growth restriction, short stature, and prominent feeding difficulties with failure to thrive. As a common feature, they often required gastric tube feeds. Genomic data in most patients are indicative of UPD as a result of trisomy rescue after meiosis II nondisjunction.

CONCLUSION

We describe the first natural history of the disorder and the results of therapeutic interventions, including the frequent requirement of direct gastric feedings only during the first few years of life, and propose that growth hormone supplementation is probably safe and effective for this condition. We suggest that UPD(20)mat can be regarded as a new imprinting disorder and its identification requires specialized molecular testing, which should be performed in patients with early-onset idiopathic isolated growth failure.Genet Med 18 4, 309-315.

Targeted methylation testing of a patient cohort broadens the epigenetic and clinical description of imprinting disorders

Imprinting disorders are associated with mutations and epimutations affecting imprinted genes, that is those whose expression is restricted by parent of origin. Their diagnosis is challenging for two reasons: firstly, their clinical features, particularly prenatal and postnatal growth disturbance, are heterogeneous and partially overlapping; secondly, their underlying molecular defects include mutation, epimutation, copy number variation, and chromosomal errors, and can be further complicated by somatic mosaicism and multi-locus methylation defects. It is currently unclear to what extent the observed phenotypic heterogeneity reflects the underlying molecular pathophysiology; in particular, the molecular and clinical diversity of multilocus methylation defects remains uncertain. To address these issues we performed comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinted genes in a research cohort of 285 patients with clinical features of imprinting disorders, with or without a positive molecular diagnosis. 20 of 91 patients (22%) with diagnosed epimutations had methylation defects of additional imprinted loci, and the frequency of developmental delay and congenital anomalies was higher among these patients than those with isolated epimutations, indicating that hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci is associated with increased diversity of clinical presentation. Among 194 patients with clinical features of an imprinting disorder but no molecular diagnosis, we found 15 (8%) with methylation anomalies, including missed and unexpected molecular diagnoses. These observations broaden the phenotypic and epigenetic definitions of imprinting disorders, and show the importance of comprehensive molecular testing for patient diagnosis and management.

Genetic basis of single-suture synostoses: genes, chromosomes and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Non syndromic craniosynostoses are the most frequent craniofacial malformations worldwide. They represent a wide and heterogeneous group of entities, in which the dysmorphism may occur in a single (simple forms) or in multiple sutures (complex forms). Simple forms present a higher birth prevalence and are classified according to the involved suture and to the corresponding abnormal cranial shape: scaphocephaly (SC; sagittal suture), trigonocephaly (TC; metopic suture), anterior plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal suture), posterior plagiocephaly (unilateral lambdoid suture). They occur commonly as sporadic forms, although a familiar recurrence is sometimes observed, suggesting a mendelian inheritance. The genetic causes of simple craniosynostosis are still largely unknown, as mutations in common craniosynostosis-associated genes and structural chromosomal aberrations have been rarely found in these cases.

AIMS

This review is intended to dissect comprehensively the state-of-the art on the genetic etiology of single suture craniosynostoses, in the attempt to categorize all known disease-associated genes and chromosomal aberrations. Possible genotype/phenotype correlations are discussed as useful clues towards the definition of optimized clinical management flowcharts.

New mechanisms involved in paternal 20q disomy associated with pseudohypoparathyroidism

PURPOSE

Type I pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP-I) can be subclassified into Ia and Ib, depending on the presence or absence of Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy's phenotype, diminished α-subunit of the stimulatory G protein (G(s)α) activity and multihormonal resistance. Whereas PHP-Ia is mainly associated with heterozygous inactivating mutations in G(s)α-coding exons of GNAS, PHP-Ib is caused by imprinting defects of GNAS. To date, just one patient with PHP and complete paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) has been described. We sought to identify the underlining molecular defect in twenty patients with parathyroid hormone resistance, hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, and abnormal methylation pattern at GNAS locus.

METHODS

Microsatellite typing and comparative genome hybridization were performed for proband and parents.

RESULTS

We describe four patients with partial paternal UPD of chromosome 20 involving pat20qUPD in one case, from 20q13.13-qter in two cases, and pat20p heterodisomy plus interstitial 20q isodisomy in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations demonstrate that mitotic recombination of chromosome 20 can also give rise to UPD and PHP, a situation similar to other imprinting disorders, such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or neonatal diabetes.

Non-mosaic trisomy 20 of paternal origin in chorionic villus and amniotic fluid also detected in fetal blood and other tissues

Trisomy 20 mosaicism is a common abnormality found in prenatal diagnosis. Its clinical significance remains unclear since approximately 90-93% of cases result in normal phenotype. Only 5 cases of non-mosaic trisomy 20 in amniotic fluid culture surviving beyond the first trimester have been reported. Moreover, trisomic cells are generally not detectable in blood and have only been reported in three cases. We present a case of non-mosaic trisomy 20 found in chorionic villi sample and amniotic fluid culture in a fetus with minor abnormalities not detected by ultrasound examination. Pathological examination of the fetus only revealed right pulmonary isomerism and camptodactily, and no major malformations were disclosed. Trisomic lineage was also detected in fetal blood, kidney, skin and brain tissue cultures. Molecular analysis revealed that the extra chromosome 20 was originated in paternal meiosis. To our knowledge, we report the first prenatal case of non-mosaic trisomy 20 of paternal origin that has been confirmed in several fetal tissues, including blood, in a fetus with minor malformations not detected prenatally.

Follow-up of a girl with cleft lip and palate and multiple malformations: Trisomy 20 mosaicism

We describe a 16(1/2) -year-old girl with multiple anomalies including cleft lip and palate and a normal karyotype in blood lymphocytes. Because of hyperpigmention along the lines of Blaschko, her karyotype in skin fibroblasts was examined, which showed mosaicism for trisomy 20. This is the first report to our knowledge of this karyotype where hyperpigmentation and facial clefting occurred together.

Physiological Dysfunctions Associated with Mutations of the Imprinted Gnas Locus

The ubiquitous Gαs-subunit of the trimeric, stimulatory G-protein plays a central role in receptor-mediated signal transduction, coupling receptor activation with the production of cAMP. The Gαs-encoding locus Gnas is now known to consist of a complex arrangement of several protein-coding and noncoding transcripts. We provide an overview of its genomic organization, its regulation by genomic imprinting, and a summary of the physiological roles of the alternative protein variants Gαs and XLαs as determined from deficient mouse models.

Expanding the phenotype of mosaic trisomy 20

Mosaic trisomy 20 is one of the more common cytogenetic abnormalities found on amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Studies have shown that outcome is normal in 90-93% of prenatally diagnosed cases. There are however, reports in the literature of children with mosaic trisomy 20 described as having an assortment of dysmorphic features and varying levels of developmental delay. Unfortunately, the literature has not defined a specific phenotype for this entity. Here we report on three patients with mosaic trisomy 20, two of whom were identified prenatally. Over a number of years of follow-up it has become apparent that there are some striking similarities among the three. Comparison between our patients and the literature cases indicates a more consistent phenotype than has previously been suggested. Recurring features include; spinal abnormalities (including spinal stenosis, vertebral fusion, and kyphosis), hypotonia, lifelong constipation, sloped shoulders, and significant learning disabilities despite normal intelligence. These findings may be overlooked on routine history and physical exam or assumed to be standard pediatric problems. It is not our intention to suggest that there is a distinctive face for this entity but to suggest that a subtle phenotype does exist. We have attempted to identify a set of findings for which any child diagnosed with mosaic trisomy 20 should be assessed or followed even in the presence of an apparently normal physical exam at birth.

Large aberrant Mongolian spots coexisting with cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita (phacomatosis pigmentovascularis type V or phacomatosis cesiomarmorata)

A 1-month-old boy showed cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita (CMTC) involving a block-like pattern on his left leg and thigh and on the left side of his trunk, along with bilateral greyish-blue hyperpigmentation involving the buttocks and thighs and being in part intermingled with CMTC. This association of CMTC with Mongolian spots has been reported as a distinct type of phacomatosis pigmentovascularis (PPV), namely PPV type V. More recently, the term phacomatosis cesiomarmorata (cesius = blue) has been proposed. We believe phacomatosis cesiomarmorata is another example of twin spotting or didymosis.

Imprinting the Gnas locus

Gnas is an enigmatic and rather complex imprinted gene locus. A single transcription unit encodes three, and possibly more, distinct proteins. These are determined by overlapping transcripts from alternative promoters with different patterns of imprinting. The canonical Gnas transcript codes for Gsalpha, a highly conserved signalling protein and an essential intermediate in growth, differentiation and homeostatic pathways. Monoallelic expression of Gnas is highly tissue-restricted. The alternative transcripts encode XLalphas, an unusual variant of Gsalpha, and the chromogranin-like protein Nesp55. These transcripts are expressed specifically from the paternal and maternal chromosomes, respectively. Their existence in the Gnas locus might imply functional connections amongst them or with Gsalpha. In this review, we consider how imprinting of Gnas was discovered, the phenotypic consequences of mutations in each of the gene products, both in the mouse and human, and provide some conjectures to explain why this elaborate imprinted locus has evolved in this manner in mammals.

Pre- and postnatal findings in trisomy 17 mosaicism

Trisomy 17 mosaicism is one of the rarest autosomal trisomies in humans. Thus far, only 23 cases have been described, most of them detected prenatally. In only five instances has mosaicism been demonstrated in lymphocytes and/or fibroblasts postnatally, and only in these have multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), facial dysmorphisms, and mental retardation been reported. Patients with trisomy 17 mosaicism at amniocentesis and a normal karyotype in blood and fibroblasts (n = 17) were always healthy. Here, we report on pre- and postnatal clinical, cytogenetic, molecular-cytogenetic, and molecular findings in four patients with trisomy 17 mosaicism. The first case was detected in cultured but not in short-term chorionic villi and amniocytes. Due to MCA on prenatal ultrasound examination the pregnancy was terminated. The second patient is a 13-month-old healthy boy, in whom low level trisomy 17 mosaicism was detected in cultured chorionic villi only. The third patient is a 2-year-old girl with growth retardation, developmental delay, MCA, and trisomy 17 mosaicism in amniocytes, fibroblasts, and placenta, but not in blood and buccal smear. The fourth patient is a 9-year-old boy with growth and mental retardation, sensoneurinal hearing loss, and MCA. Cytogenetic analyses showed trisomy 17 mosaicism in amniocytes, skin fibroblasts, and urinary sediment cells, whereas in blood and buccal smear a 46,XY karyotype was found. Molecular investigations in all four cases indicated biparental inheritance of chromosome 17. Formation of trisomy was most likely due to a maternal meiosis I error in Patient 1 and a postzygotic non-disjunction of the paternal chromosome 17 in Patient 4. Cerebellar malformations, reported in two cases from the literature and in two reported here may be a specific feature of trisomy 17 mosaicism. Since the aberration has rarely been reported in lymphocytes, chordocentesis is not indicated in prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal genetic counseling for trisomy 17 mosaicism in chorionic villi or amniocytes should consider that the clinical significance remains uncertain.

Mosaic ring 20 with no detectable deletion by FISH analysis: Characteristic seizure disorder and literature review

Ring chromosome 20 is a rare chromosome disorder characterized by a typical seizure phenotype consisting of complex partial seizures, frequent progression to generalized tonic or tonic-clonic seizures, and nocturnal frontal lobe seizures with frequent episodes of non-convulsive status epilepticus. Development may be normal or mildly delayed, followed by cognitive and behavioral decline after seizure onset. Here, we describe a patient with a typical severe seizure phenotype and a mosaic ring chromosome 20 without loss of p or q subtelomere regions or telomeric sequences. The ring had a longer telomere length than either of the telomere ends of its homologous chromosome 20 by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, suggesting that it might be derived from telomere-telomere fusion. The phenotypic comparison of this patient and other chromosome 20 cases that had terminal deletions of 20qter (n = 1) and 20pter (n = 7), shows that the epilepsy phenotype and electroencephalographic abnormalities are characteristic in patients with ring chromosome 20. Several hypotheses have been proposed to address the elusive mechanisms underlying the seizure disorder in ring chromosome 20. These possibilities include haploinsufficiency of two epilepsy genes CHRNA4 and KCNQ2 located at 20qter, silencing of these genes by a telomere position effect, or microdeletions or rearrangements of genetic material during the ring formation.

Fetus with two identical reciprocal translocations: Description of a rare complication of consanguinity

We report on a 24-week fetus with multiple organ anomalies secondary to biparental inheritance of an apparently balanced t(17;20) reciprocal translocation. The pregnancy was terminated following the discovery by ultrasound of an abnormal heart and micrognathia. At autopsy, the following anomalies were found: Pierre-Robin sequence, hypoplasia of the right ventricle with muscular hypertrophy, and endocardial fibroelastosis, hypoplastic lungs, dysplastic left kidney, bilateral pelvicalyceal dilatation, central nervous system periventricular heterotopias and right sided club foot. Given the endocardial fibroelastosis and cleft palate, Eastman-Bixler syndrome (Facio-cardio-renal) is a possible diagnosis. The parents were first cousins and each had an identical t(17;20)(q21.1;p11.21) translocation. The fetal karyotype was 46,XX,t(17;20)(q21.1;p11.21)mat,t(17;20)(q21.1;p11.21)pat. While there are a few reports of consanguineous families where both the mother and father had the same reciprocal translocation and offspring with unbalanced karyotypes, we were unable to find any reports of a fetus/child with double identical reciprocal translocations. We propose that although the fetus had an apparently balanced karyotype, inheriting only the translocated chromosomes led to the unmasking of a recessive syndrome. It seems most likely that a gene (or genes) was disrupted by the breaks but the parents might also be heterozygous carriers of a recessive gene mutation since the fetus must be homozygous by descent for many loci on both chromosomes 17 and 20 (as well as on other chromosomal segments). It was not possible to totally exclude segmental uniparental disomy as a cause of the anomalies as no recombinations were detected for chromosome 17. However, there is no evidence to suggest that chromosome 17 is imprinted and UPD 20 was excluded thus making an imprinting error unlikely.

Prenatally detected trisomy 20 mosaicism

BACKGROUND

Trisomy 20 is one of the more common mosaic trisomies detected on amniocentesis and presents with a normal outcome in over 90% of reported cases. Trisomic cells are almost never confirmed in newborn blood and are only rarely found in other fetal or placental samples. Nonetheless, some abnormal outcomes have been reported, including unexplained fetal demise, intrauterine growth restriction, and multiple congenital anomalies. Because of the lack of molecular studies on such cases, it is unknown whether the origin of trisomy or presence of uniparental disomy (UPD) could have some influence on outcome.

METHODS

We present data on six cases of trisomy mosaicism, two detected by chorionic villous sampling (CVS) and four by amniocentesis (AF), submitted to our laboratory for molecular studies.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A meiotic origin of the trisomy could be confirmed in only one of these cases. In addition, uniparental disomy was excluded in all four cases for which parents were available for testing. The four cases with low levels of trisomy in amniotic fluid (0%, 10%, 11%, and 12%) were associated with a normal outcome. The remaining two cases of trisomy 20 had high levels of trisomy in amniotic fluid (96% and 58%) and had abnormal outcomes (developmental delay in one and stillbirth with IUGR and severe oligohydramnios in the other). Including previously published cases, there is a clear association with the level of trisomy and outcome, with only 4% abnormal outcomes when <40% trisomic cells were detected. Higher levels of trisomy were also observed in male fetuses as compared to female fetuses (p = 0.01); however, there were no sex differences in frequency of abnormal outcomes.

Trisomy 20 mosaicism caused by a maternal meiosis II error is associated with normal intellect but multiple congenital anomalies

Mosaicism for trisomy 20 is generally ascertained following prenatal sampling and rarely is associated with significant phenotypic abnormalities. Uniparental disomy for chromosome 20 in the euploid lines has been found in several cases, which showed relatively mild clinical features, primarily growth delay. Here we report on a case of mosaic trisomy 20 in a child with normal neurologic development who was ascertained because of multiple physical anomalies including spinal segmentation anomalies and altered skin pigmentation. Trisomic cells were found in buccal epithelial cells and in cultured skin fibroblasts but not in peripheral blood. Molecular analysis of blood cells, fibroblasts, and parental cells gave evidence of a maternal meiosis II error as the cause of the trisomy. Disomic cells presumably arose through trisomy rescue, and no evidence was found for uniparental disomy in these cells.

Sex-specific chromosome instability in early human development

The predominance of females segregating chromosome aberrations to their offspring has been explained mostly by selection disadvantage of unbalanced products of spermatogenesis. However, analysis of data from the literature supports the idea that somatic cells of early female embryos are similar to female germ cells in that they are prone to malsegregation. The goal of this study was to compare the sex ratio (male to female ratio) of carriers of presumably mitotic-occurring chromosome abnormalities to identify any sex biases. In examining the literature, we found a female prevalence in cases of mosaicism associated with uniparental disomy (UPD) (26 male individuals/conceptions and 45 female individuals/conceptions, sex ratio is 0.58, significantly different from 1.06 in newborn population, P = 0.0292). This predominance was highest at gestational age <16 week (8 male and 22 female conceptuses, sex ratio is 0.36, significantly different from expected figure of 1.28, P = 0.0025), which diminished at later stages of fetal development indicating potential correction of trisomies predominantly in females. There is a threefold prevalence of 46,XX/45,X mosaics over 46,XY/45,X mosaics in prenatally diagnosed cases, which also suggests a gender-specific postzygotic chromosome loss. The male prevalence in Prader-Willi syndrome with maternal UPD of chromosome 15 also can be explained by sex-specific trisomy correction, with predominant loss of a maternal chromosome causing biparental inheritance and therefore, complete correction of trisomy in females (without UPD). Finally, there is a female predominance in carriers of chromosome rearrangement with pericentromere break (mosaicism for Robertsonian translocation/isochromosome, centric fission, nonacrocentric isochromosome, and whole arm rearrangement), in both prenatal (21 males and 36 females, sex ratio is 0.58, P < 0.0184) and postnatal ill-defined cases (14 males and 35 females, sex ratio is 0.40, P = 0.001). Thus, the findings presented in this paper suggest that, in addition to reduction in male fertility, and to probable selection against abnormal cell line(s), there are two mechanisms that contribute to female preponderance among carriers of mosaicism: sex-specific chromosome loss and sex-specific centromere instability. The data obtained suggest that females may have gonadal mosaicism for aneuploidies and structural rearrangements more often than males. This may lead to the maternal origin bias in offspring with trisomies or structural rearrangements.

Uniparental disomy (UPD) other than 15: Phenotypes and bibliography updated

Uniparental disomy (UPD) describes the inheritance of a pair of chromosomes from only one parent. The concept was introduced in Medical Genetics by Engel (1980); Am J Med Genet 6:137-143. Aside UPD 15, which is the most frequent one, up to now (February 2005) 197 cases with whole chromosome maternal UPD other than 15 (124 X heterodisomy, 59 X isodisomy, and 14 cases without information of the mode of UPD) and 68 cases with whole chromosome paternal UPD other than 15 (13 X heterdisomy, 53 X isodisomy, and 2 cases without information of the mode of UPD) have been reported. In this review we discuss briefly the problems associated with UPD and provide a comprehensive clinical summary with a bibliography for each UPD other than 15 as a guide for genetic counseling.