Over-representation of two specific haplotypes among chromosomes harbouring BRCA1 mutations

A Novel Mutation-BRCA1 Associated Hereditary Haplotype of Intragenic Markers of BRCA1 Gene in a Family with History of Breast Cancer

Background:

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among women, Tumor suppressor genes such as BRCA1 involved in cell cycle control and repairing of DNA damage. BRCA1 is a risk factor gene that alteration in its protein cause in susceptibility to breast or ovarian cancer. Short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphism is linked to some disease.

Objective:

The aim of this study was screening a new mutation in patients with familial breast cancer.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, 200 women with breast cancer were participated. Among the patients, 40 women suffer from familial breast cancer. After DNA extraction from peripheral blood samples, Exons 16 to 23 of BRCA1 gene directly analyzed in SSCP gel electrophoresis followed by direct sequencing.

Results:

After direct sequencing, a new mutation was detected in intron 17 of BRCA1 gene. Three patients of one family have a germ line intronic mutation in the BRCA1 gene (IVS17-27delA). Also, this mutation in this family is linked to a haplotype of intragenic short tandem repeat (STR) in the BRCA1 gene.

Conclusion:

By Screening of gene mutations can be found association of mutation and incidence of disease. Also, studying the mutation in families and finding specific hereditary patterns in that family can be effective in prognosis of disease in other family members.

Risk of contralateral breast cancer associated with common variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2: potential modifying effect of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier status

Rare deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with an elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Whether or not common variants in these genes are independently associated with risk of breast cancer remains unclear. In this study, we included 632 Caucasian women with asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (CBC, cases) and 1,221 women with unilateral breast cancer (UBC, controls) from the WECARE (Women's Environment, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology) Study. BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutation status was measured using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography followed by direct sequencing, yielding including 88 BRCA1 and 60 BRCA2 deleterious mutation carriers. We also genotyped samples on the Illumina Omni1-Quad platform. We assessed the association between CBC risk and common (minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in BRCA1 (n SNPs = 22) and BRCA2 (n SNPs = 30) and haplotypes using conditional logistic regression accounting for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status. We found no significant associations between any single-SNPs or haplotypes of BRCA1 or BRCA2 and risk of CBC among all women. When we stratified by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier status, we found suggestive evidence that risk estimates for selected SNPs in BRCA1 (rs8176318, rs1060915, and rs16940) and BRCA2 (rs11571686, rs206115, and rs206117) may differ in non-carriers and carriers of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. One common haplotype on BRCA1 was inversely significantly associated with risk only among non-BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. The association between common variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and risk of CBC may differ depending on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier status.

Comparing the frequency of common genetic variants and haplotypes between carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations in Australian women diagnosed with breast cancer before 40 years of age

Background

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are found in a proportion of families with multiple early-onset breast cancers. There are a large number of different deleterious mutations in both genes, none of which would be detectable using standard genetic association studies. Single common variants and haplotypes of common variants may capture groups of deleterious mutations since some low prevalence haplotypes of common variants occur more frequently among chromosomes that carry rare, deleterious mutations than chromosomes that do not.

Methods

DNA sequence data for BRCA1 and BRCA2 was obtained from 571 participants from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study. Genetic variants were classified as either deleterious mutations or common genetic variants. Variants tagging common polymorphisms were selected and haplotypes resolved using Haploview. Their frequency was compared to those with and without deleterious mutations using a permutation test.

Results

A common genetic variant in BRCA1 (3232A > G) was found to be over-represented in deleterious mutation carriers (p = 0.05), whereas a common genetic variant in BRCA2 (1342A > C) occurred less frequently in deleterious mutation carriers (p = 0.04). All four of the common BRCA1 variants used to form haplotypes occurred more frequently in the deleterious mutation carriers when compared to the non-carriers, but there was no evidence of a difference in the distributions between the two groups (p = 0.34). In BRCA2, all four common variants were found to occur less frequently in the deleterious mutation carriers when compared to non-carriers, but the evidence for difference in the distribution between the two groups was weak (p = 0.16). Several less common haplotypes of common BRCA1 variants were found to be over-represented among deleterious mutation carriers but there was no evidence for this at the population level. In BRCA2, only the most common haplotype was found to occur more frequently in deleterious mutation carriers, with again no evidence at the population level.

Conclusions

We observed differences in the frequency of common genetic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 and their haplotypes between early-onset breast cancer cases who did and did not carry deleterious mutations in these genes. Although our data provide only weak evidence for a difference in frequencies at the population level, the number of deleterious mutation carriers was low and the results may yet be substantiated in a larger study using pooled data.

A novel frequent BRCA1 allele in Chinese patients with breast cancer

The whole length of exon 11 of BRCA1 was sequenced (total 3427 bp) in 59 patients and 10 healthy female blood donors. To allow a rapid determination of the different BRCA1 alleles, a sequence-specific primer PCR method (PCR-SSP) was established and was applied to 57 additional female donors. Finally, the full-length coding region of BRCA1 was analyzed through reversed-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and cDNA sequencing (total 5554 bp) in one donor with wild-type allele and 2 patients with one or two mutated alleles. By genomic DNA sequencing, 5 homozygous polymorphisms were observed in 18 patients: 2201C>T, 2430T>C, 2731C>T, 3232A>G and 3667A>G All of them were previously observed in Caucasians, Malay and Chinese, but for the first time the mutations were found in one allele (GenBank AY304547). Twenty-six patients and 4 donors were heterozygous at these 5 nucleotide positions. The remaining 15 patients and 6 donors showed a sequence identical with the standard BRCA1 gene. Combined the PCR-SSP results and in a summary, 6 of 67 (9.0 %) healthy individuals were homozygous for the mutated allele, whereas 18 of 59 (30.5 %) breast cancer patients were homozygous. A Chi-square test showed a significant correlation between homozygous mutated BRCA1 allele and breast cancer. The cDNA sequencing showed that 2 additional mutations, 4427T>C in exon 13 and 4956A>G in exon 16, were found. A new BRCA1 allele, which is BRCAI-2201T/2430C/2731T/3232G/3667G/4427C/4956G (GenBank AY751490), was found in Chinese. And the homozygote of this mutated allele may implicate a disease-association in Chinese.

Recent advances in biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and treatment

With the availability of new technologies and the increased interest of medical practitioners to use molecular biomarkers in early detection and diagnosis, and in the prediction of therapeutic treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes, the academic and research institutions, as well as the pharmaceutical industry, have increased their efforts to develop novel molecular biomarkers for several human diseases, including cancer. The identification of molecular biomarkers also enables the development of a new generation of diagnostic products and to integrate diagnostics and therapeutics. This integrated approach will aid in 'individualizing' the medical practice. Here, we address issues related to the development of biomarkers, novel technological platforms used for drug development, future technologies and strategies for validating biomarkers for their clinical utility.

Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations

This work describes an approach to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants detected during the genetic testing of BRCA1 in patients from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families. Results from transgenic mice and extensive clinical testing support the hypothesis that biallelic BRCA1 mutations result in embryonic lethality. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that variants of uncertain clinical significance found to reside in trans with known deleterious mutations impart reduced risk for cancer. This approach was applied to a large data set of 55,630 patients who underwent clinical BRCA1 screening by whole gene direct DNA sequencing. Fourteen common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used to assign 10 previously defined common, recurrent, or canonical haplotypes in 99% of these cases. From a total of 1,477 genetic variants detected in these patients, excluding haplotype-tagging SNPs, 877 (59%) could be unambiguously assigned to one or more haplotypes. In 41 instances, variants previously classified as being of uncertain clinical significance, mostly missense variants, were excluded as fully penetrant mutations due to their coincidence in trans with known deleterious mutations. From a total of 1,150 patients that harbored these 41 variants, 956 carried one as the sole variant of uncertain clinical significance reported. This approach could have widespread application to other disease genes where compound heterozygous mutations are incompatible with life or result in obvious phenotypes. This largely computational technique is advantageous because it relies upon existing clinical data and is likely to prove informative for prevalent genetic variants in large data sets.

A multi-exonic BRCA1 deletion identified in multiple families through single nucleotide polymorphism haplotype pair analysis and gene amplification with widely dispersed primer sets

The identification of intragenic rearrangements is important for a comprehensive understanding of mutations that occur in some clinically important genes. Single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes obtained from clinical sequence data have been used to identify patients at high risk for rearrangement mutations. Application of this method identified a novel 26-kb deletion of BRCA1 exons 14 through 20 in patients from multiple families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Clinical sequence data from 5911 anonymous patients were screened for genotypes that were inconsistent with known pairs of canonical haplotypes in BRCA1 that could be explained by hemizygous deletions involving exon 16. Long-range polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that two of six samples identified by this search contained a deletion in the expected region encompassing exons 14 through 20. The breakpoint was fully characterized by DNA sequencing and demonstrated that the deletion resulted from Alu-mediated recombination. This mutation was also identified twice in a set of 982 anonymous specimens that had negative clinical test results, but uninformative haplotypes. Three additional occurrences of this mutation were found by testing 10 other patients with the indicative genotype. An assay for this mutation was added to a comprehensive clinical breast/ovarian cancer test and eight more instances were found in 20,649 probands. This multiexon deletion has therefore been detected in 15 different North American families with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. In conclusion, this primarily computational approach is highly effective and identifies specimens using existing data that are enriched for deletion mutations.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in clinical genetic testing: the characterization of the clinical significance of genetic variants and their application in clinical research for BRCA1

Clinical genetic testing is increasingly employed in the medical management of cancer patients. These tests support a variety of clinical decisions by providing results that indicate risk for future disease, confirmation of diagnoses, and more recently, therapeutic selection and prognosis. Most genetic variation detected during clinical testing involves single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Continued advances in the technologies of genetic analyses make these tests increasingly sensitive, cost-effective and timely, which contribute to their increased utilization. Conversely, it has proven difficult to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants that do not obviously truncate the open reading frames of genes. These genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance diminish the value of genetic test results. This article highlights a variety of approaches that have emerged from research in diverse disciplines to solve the problem, including the application of information about common SNPs in multiple methods to better characterize clinically uncertain variants. Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, and in particular BRCA1, provides a framework for this discussion. BRCA1 is particularly interesting in this respect since clinical genetic testing by direct DNA sequencing for over 50,000 patients in North America has revealed approximately 1500 genetic variants to date. This large data set combined with the clinical significance of BRCA1 have resulted in research groups selecting BRCA1 as a preferred gene to evaluate novel methods in this field. Finally, the lessons learned through work with BRCA1 are highly applicable to many other genes associated with cancer risk.

Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of BRCA1 missense sequence variants remain uncharacterized for their possible effect on protein expression and function, and therefore are unclassified in terms of their pathogenicity. BRCA1 plays diverse cellular roles and it is unlikely that any single functional assay will accurately reflect the total cellular implications of missense mutations in this gene.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the effect of two BRCA1 variants, 5236G>C (G1706A) and 5242C>A (A1708E) on BRCA1 function, and to survey the relative usefulness of several assays to direct the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA genes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from a range of bioinformatic, genetic, and histopathological analyses, and in vitro functional assays indicated that the 1708E variant was associated with the disruption of different cellular functions of BRCA1. In transient transfection experiments in T47D and 293T cells, the 1708E product was mislocalised to the cytoplasm and induced centrosome amplification in 293T cells. The 1708E variant also failed to transactivate transcription of reporter constructs in mammalian transcriptional transactivation assays. In contrast, the 1706A variant displayed a phenotype comparable to wildtype BRCA1 in these assays. Consistent with functional data, tumours from 1708E carriers showed typical BRCA1 pathology, while tumour material from 1706A carriers displayed few histopathological features associated with BRCA1 related tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive range of genetic, bioinformatic, and functional analyses have been combined for the characterisation of BRCA1 unclassified sequence variants. Consistent with the functional analyses, the combined odds of causality calculated for the 1706A variant after multifactorial likelihood analysis (1:142) indicates a definitive classification of this variant as "benign". In contrast, functional assays of the 1708E variant indicate that it is pathogenic, possibly through subcellular mislocalisation. However, the combined odds of 262:1 in favour of causality of this variant does not meet the minimal ratio of 1000:1 for classification as pathogenic, and A1708E remains formally designated as unclassified. Our findings highlight the importance of comprehensive genetic information, together with detailed functional analysis for the definitive categorisation of unclassified sequence variants. This combination of analyses may have direct application to the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Haplotype analysis of BRCA1 gene reveals a new gene rearrangement: characterization of a 19.9 KBP deletion

Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 gene cause hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for about 40% of high-risk families. Mutation-screening methods generally focus on genomic DNA and are usually PCR based; they enable the detection of sequence alterations such as point mutations and small deletions and insertions. However, they do not allow the detection of partial or entire exon(s) loss, because the presence of the homologous allele results in a positive PCR signal, giving rise to a false-negative result. Identification of unusual haplotypes in patient samples by an expectation maximization algorithm has recently been suggested as a method for identifying hemizygous regions caused by large intragenic deletions. Using a similar approach, we identified a novel BRCA1 genomic rearrangement in a breast/ovarian cancer family negative at the first mutation screening; we detected a deletion encompassing exons 14-19, probably due to replication slippage between Alu sequences.

Haplotype analysis of common variants in the BRCA1 gene and risk of sporadic breast cancer

Introduction

Truncation mutations in the BRCA1 gene cause a substantial increase in risk of breast cancer. However, these mutations are rare in the general population and account for little of the overall incidence of sporadic breast cancer.

Method

We used whole-gene resequencing data to select haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms, and examined the association between common haplotypes of BRCA1 and breast cancer in a nested case-control study in the Nurses' Health Study (1323 cases and 1910 controls).

Results

One haplotype was associated with a slight increase in risk (odds ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.37). A significant interaction (P = 0.05) was seen between this haplotype, positive family history of breast cancer, and breast cancer risk. Although not statistically significant, similar interactions were observed with age at diagnosis and with menopausal status at diagnosis; risk tended to be higher among younger, pre-menopausal women.

Conclusions

We have described a haplotype in the BRCA1 gene that was associated with an approximately 20% increase in risk of sporadic breast cancer in the general population. However, the functional variant(s) responsible for the association are unclear.