The use of Medpor coated tear drainage tube in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy

Restrictive Strabismus Developing after Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy

Purpose: To report a case of diplopia caused by restrictive strabismus developing after conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR).Case summary: A 61-year-old female presented with persistent epiphora after failure to repair ipsilateral canalicular lacerations of the left eye caused by trauma occurred 25 years ago. CDCR was performed and the epiphora improved. Four months later, the patient presented with diplopia on the left gaze. An abduction limitation of -4 and a supraduction limitation of -3 were observed in the left eye. Therefore, Jones tube removal was performed 5 months after CDCR surgery. Two weeks later, as the limitations persisted, adhesiolysis of the conjunctiva and an amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) were performed. This exposed a subconjunctival adhesion at the inferonasal conjunctiva; histopathological examination revealed fibrotic tissues. Three months later, the adhesions recurred and the patient was transferred to another hospital. Conjunctival adhesiolysis, AMT, and a 6.5 mm recession of medial rectus (MR) muscle were performed. One week later, exotropia occurred in the primary position, and the MR muscle of the left eye was advanced by 2 mm. Nine months after the final surgery, the primary gaze was orthotropia. The diplopia within the central 20° of visual field had disappeared. However, a levoelevation limitation of -1.5 remained in the left eye.Conclusions: CDCR is the only treatment method for patients with occlusion of both the upper and lower proximal lacrimal canaliculi. However, rare complications such as restrictive strabismus with diplopia may occur. As preventing adhesion is difficult, sufficient patient notice is required prior to surgery.

Comparison of external versus diode laser conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with lacrimal bypass tube placement in proximal canalicular blocks

AIMS

Hyperlacrimation due to ocular surface or lid abnormality was ruled out and apposition of lower punctum to globe was checked.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This was a pilot study at a tertiary eye care center where 40 patients of proximal canalicular block <8 mm on probing were divided into two equal groups. The external CDCR group underwent routine dacryocystorhinostomy with partial carunculectomy. A tract was created from canthus to nasal cavity with von Graefe knife. In the laser CDCR group, the osteotomy was created using 980 mm diode laser with a power of 8 W. Glass tubes of appropriate length were placed and fixed using 5-0 polypropylene with our "mirror tuck technique." Results were analyzed using the Chi-square test for parametric and ANOVA test for nonparametric variables using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Success defined as patency on syringing was achieved in 18 patients in the laser group and 16 in the external CDCR group which was comparable (P > 0.05). Complications include tube extrusion, dislocation, conjunctival overgrowth, and sump syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Laser and external CDCRs are both effective and safe procedures for the treatment of proximal canalicular blocks with comparable success rates and complications.

[Conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of proximal lacrimal drainage obstruction]

The problem of reconstruction of the lacrimal drainage system in cases of obliteration of both lacrimal points and/or both lacrimal canaliculi remains one of the most difficult in dacryology. The most common and effective operation for this pathology is Conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy using tubes developed by L. Jones in 1962. However, wearing the tube for a long time and the complications associated with it can cause dissatisfaction with the treatment, even if the surgery was successful. The surgery technique and the tubes design have undergone numerous modifications to increase the amount of positive outcomes and reduce the number of complications. The results of original studies on this problem were analyzed revealing a lack of knowledge about the optimal design and material of the implant. There are few studies aimed at developing methods that ensure persistent preservation of the anastomosis after tube removal.

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) success rates and complications in endoscopic vs non-endoscopic approaches: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Epiphora due to refractory bicanalicular obstructions is typically managed by conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with or without the assistance of nasal endoscopy. However, the evidence for its benefit is unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on the treatment of epiphora by CDCR was performed (March 1, 2018). All studies reporting original data on patients suffering from epiphora treated with CDCR surgery were included. Primary outcomes were success and satisfaction rates. Secondary outcomes were CDCR complications. A comparison was made between the results obtained in patients undergoing CDCR with vs without assistance of nasal endoscopy.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies representing information on 2555 CDCR procedures were included in the systematic review. All the studies are case series, most of them retrospective. Lester Jones tube (LJT) is the most commonly used in CDCR (66.7%). The overall success rate with all studies included (n = 2555) was 88.9%; 90.8% (n = 890) in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope and 87.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. The overall "tube displacement" rate, the most common complication, was 24.5% (n = 2522), 20.8% (n = 1575) tube displacement in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope vs 26.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. Only 3 studies (5.5%) used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate epiphora improvement. Due to the low level of evidence and the high bias of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data available in the literature, CDCR is considered an effective procedure for treating epiphora due to proximal obstruction. Controlled and qualitative studies are needed to clarify the significance of the endoscope's contribution to CDCR.

Results of a new "mirror tuck technique" for fixation of lacrimal bypass tube in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy

Context:

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) is the procedure of choice for proximal canalicular blocks. However, the complications of tube migration and extrusion limit its widespread practice.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and complications of the new “mirror tuck technique” for fixation of lacrimal bypass glass tube without holes in proximal canalicular blocks in laser CDCR.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective interventional study was conducted in forty consecutive eyes of adult patients, undergoing 980 nm diode laser CDCR for proximal canalicular blocks. After creating the tract under endoscopic guidance, the collar of the glass tube was fixed to the conjunctiva with 6-0 prolene suture by “mirror tuck technique.” Success was defined as the absence of extrusion of tube with patent tract and relief in epiphora at 1 year of follow-up.

Results:

Both anatomical and functional success was achieved in 39 (97.5%) cases. Tube displacement occurred in one patient suffering from allergic conjunctivitis in which the tube had to be removed. A temporary heaviness was reported by 5 (12.5%) patients till about 2 weeks. Conjunctival overgrowth over the tube occurred in 1 (2.5%) eye at 5 months which was excised and treated with application of 0.02% mitomycin C with no subsequent recurrence. There were no cases of suture abscess or suture intolerance warranting tube removal.

Conclusion:

“Mirror tuck technique” is an effective method for tube fixation (for tube without holes) in CDCR. However, it is important to position the conjunctival opening so as to leave sufficient space for passage of sutures for anchorage medially.

Canaliculorhinostomy-Indications and Surgical Results

PURPOSE

To report the surgical results of canaliculorhinostomy for patients with distal canalicular obstruction and lacking a structurally functional lacrimal sac who would otherwise require a conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with Jones tube placement.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Setting: Single tertiary institution.

PERIOD

November 1994 to June 2011.

PATIENT POPULATION

Sixteen patients with canalicular obstruction at or beyond 8 mm from the punctum, with an absent or unidentifiable lacrimal sac.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent canaliculorhinostomy, whereby direct anastomosis of the canaliculi or common canaliculus to the nasal mucosa was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anatomic and functional success.

RESULTS

Our study comprised 16 patients with a mean age of 44.9 ± 21.9 years. Ten (62.5%) were female and 6 (37.5%) male. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.8 years. Causes of an absent or unidentifiable lacrimal sac included previous trauma (n = 8, 50.0%), previous dacryocystorhinostomy (n = 4, 25.0%), chronic dacryocystitis (n = 3, 18.8%), and previous dacryocystectomy (n = 1, 6.2%). Anastomoses between the upper and lower canaliculi and the nasal mucosa was performed in 6 patients, while that between the common canaliculus and nasal mucosa was performed in 10. Anatomic and functional success rates were 87.5% (n = 14) and 81.3% (n = 13), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Canaliculorhinostomy has reasonable success rates and provides an effective surgical alternative for a group of patients in whom CDCR with Jones tube placement would otherwise have been indicated.

Can Lester Jones tubes be tolerated for decades?

PurposeLester Jones described canalicular bypass tubes 50 years ago. We present a cohort of patients with Jones' tubes first placed between 1969 and 1989, and who were reviewed within the last 15 years.Patients and methodsRetrospective case-note review for living patients identified as having had Jones' tube placement prior to 1990. The duration of Jones' tube usage was noted and the number of replacements recorded.ResultsTwenty-nine patients (33 eyes) had maintenance of their Jones' tube(s) within the last 15 years, and had first tube placement before 1990. The average follow-up was 29.5 years (median 28.8 years, range 17-45.7 years). The original tube was present in 8/33 (24%) of eyes, at a mean survival of 34 years (33.3 years; range 29.4-44.4 years). The number of tube replacements during follow-up ranged from 0 to 9 (mean 1.7; median 1). When considering the initially placed tube in all 33 eyes, however, the survival ranged between 18 days and 44.4 years (mean 13.6 years; median 6.9 years). At last follow-up, 11/33 (33%) of eyes had lost their tubes, with 9 having minimal or no symptoms.ConclusionsThese patients with Jones' tube placement before 1990 provides the first recorded evidence that the device can be tolerated for at least four decades, and that some patients will-with appropriate outpatient maintenance-retain their originally placed tube. This information may be useful in counselling patients about the lifetime expectation for bypass tubes.

Success Rate of Variable Collar Size Frosted Jones Tubes

PURPOSE

To describe success rates and long-term outcomes of conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with larger collar (4.5 or 5.0 mm) frosted Jones tubes (FJTs).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who received a larger collar (4.5 or 5.0 mm) FJT following CDCR by an author (RAD) was performed between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016. Patient demographics, etiology of tearing, follow-up time from placement of larger collar FJT, original tube collar diameter, number and sizes of collar adjustments, tearing status, and complications were recorded. Exclusion criteria included follow up less than 6 months after placement of a larger collar FJT. The study was IRB approved, HIPAA compliant, and adherent to the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (29 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. Average follow-up time was 30 months. Twenty-eight out of 29 eyes had complete resolution of tearing after placement of larger collar FJT and no tubes were lost. Fourteen out of 29 eyes required adjustment in collar size after a larger collar was placed. Two out of 13 eyes that had a 5.0 mm collar placed required exchanged due to collar prominence.

CONCLUSION

With the use of larger collar FJTs, the long-term success of CDCR in tearing patients remains highly effective. This study demonstrates larger collar FJTs are well tolerated and help reduce the chance of tube loss.

Endoscopic Transretracaruncular-Middle Meteas Tract for Insertion of a Porous Polyethylene-Coated Jones Tube

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to describe a modified lacrimal bypass with a porous polyethylene-coated Jones tube.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients (180 eyes) with a nonreconstructable lacrimal obstruction underwent lacrimal bypass with a porous polyethylene-coated Jones tube through a retrocaruncular-middle meatus tract approach with endoscopic assistance. All patients were followed up at least for 24 months. Success rate of lacrimal bypass was analyzed and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were finally included. Duration of surgery ranged from 28 to 47 minutes (mean 37.2 ± 4.2 minutes). The mean duration of follow-up was 30.0 ± 6.4 months (range 24-48 months). The mean tube length was 23.2 ± 1.9 mm (range 20-28 mm). At the final review, complete success was achieved in 138 (79.3%) patients. Moderate success was achieved in 23 (13.2%) patients, and 13 (7.5%) patients failed. Of the 161 patients successfully treated, 24 patients underwent revision surgery to excise granulomas (15 patients) or adjust tube position (9 patients). The complications included granuloma proliferation around the openings of the tube (28 eyes), downward displacement of the tube (17 eyes), and ocular discomfort (15 eyes). The majority of downward tube migration occurred in patients who had a prior history of dacryocystorhinostomy. The treatment failed for 5 patients because of repeated granulomas covering the nasal tube openings, and the treatment failed for 8 patients because of downward displacement of the tube.

CONCLUSIONS

Our procedure appears to be an effective method for closed insertion of a porous polyethylene-coated Jones.

Medial Canthoplasty Combined with Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy for the Treatment of Delayed Medial Telecanthal Deformity

Background:

Rupture of the medial canthal ligament can be caused by many events. It remains a challenge to rebuild the drainage system and restore the function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of medial canthoplasty combined with conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) in patients with medial telecanthal deformities and lacrimal drainage system damage.

Methods:

Twenty-two patients (22 eyes) treated with medial canthoplasty and CDCR during June 2012 to June 2014 were included in this retrospective study. For all patients, a self-tapping, titanium, low-profile head microscrew was drilled into the solid bone on the posterior aspect of the anterior lacrimal crest at the attachment position of the medial canthal ligament. Medpor-coated tear drainage tubes were applied. Distance of patient's lateral displacement before and after operation was recorded and compared. The complications of CDCR were described.

Results:

Before the surgery, distance of patient's canthal displacement was 4–6 mm. The canthal distance between two eyes of patients with surgery was 1 mm or less. Among patients with CDCR, four patients had proximal obstruction and two patients had distal obstruction. Five patients had tube malposition, for example, tube extrusion 1–3 months after surgery.

Conclusions:

Medial canthoplasty combined with CDCR is an effective surgical method for treatment of patients with medial telecanthal deformity and lacrimal drainage system obstruction. The study indicates that medial canthoplasty combined with CDCR surgery rebuilds normal appearance of eyelid and contour of the medial canthus and successfully repairs the function of the lacrimal drainage system.

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube: a history and update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current opinions and trends in the management of upper lacrimal obstruction include design variations on the original Lester Jones tube and updated awareness and management of the problems associated with the tubes. This article includes a brief review of the fascinating history of the development of the Jones tube, which sets the perspective for the current scientific dialog.

RECENT FINDINGS

First, many design modifications have been proposed to reduce the risk of tube migration and extrusion, with no consensus on the best tube. Second, the issue of retrograde airflow through the Jones tube with the use of continuous positive airway pressure is an increasingly common and challenging problem. Third, bacterial biofilms on the surface of the Jones tube can play a role in recalcitrant infections. Jones tubes can be cleaned or replaced in the office setting with topical anesthesia.

SUMMARY

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with placement of a Jones tube remains the gold standard for management of upper lacrimal obstruction. This article provides an updated perspective on issues with extrusion or migration of the tube, bothersome retrograde airflow with the use of a continuous positive airway pressure device, and management of crusting and possible infectious biofilms on the tube.

Early Experience with the StopLoss Jones Tube

PURPOSE

Extrusion is the most common reason for failure after Jones tube placement. The StopLoss Jones tube (SLJT) is a new innovation in Jones tubes that incorporates a flexible silicone internal flange to resist extrusion. We present our early experience of using this new tube and associated introducer system.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the case notes of a single surgeon consecutive series of patients having SLJT placement from November 2011 to November 2013.

RESULTS

29 SLJTs were placed in 25 eyes of 19 patients. Tube follow-up ranged from 1-25 months (mean 10 months) with a total of 291 tube-months. The indications for SLJT placement were: previous LJT complications (52%), failed canalicular-DCR surgery (31%), primary placement for inoperable canalicular occlusion (14%) and patent non-functioning DCR (3%). Tube length ranged from 10-16 mm. The tube introducer system was simple and effective and there were no intra-operative complications. The tube extrusion rate was 0%. Complications occurred in 5 tubes: 1 was too long, and 4 others (14%) developed conjunctival overgrowth/medial tube migration. Patient satisfaction with the tube was: 86% fully satisfied, 10% was moderately satisfied, 3% not satisfied. The overall final surgical success rate at last follow-up was 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this short follow-up initial study the SLJT is simple to use and has a high rate of success and patient satisfaction. The addition of the internal silicone flange appears to prevent the previously common problem of extrusion.

Comparison of Medpor coated tear drainage tube versus silicon tear drainage tube in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy: problems and solutions

PURPOSE

This study aims at comparing two different types of drainage tubes in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy, which are used for upper lacrimal system obstruction or damage, with respect to their respective postoperative problems and solutions.

METHODS

Nineteen eyes of 17 patients who underwent conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) or conjunctivorhinostomy (CR) surgery with a Medpor coated tear drainage tube or silicon tube placement between October, 2010, and February, 2014, were included in this retrospective comparative study.

RESULTS

In the initial surgery, Medpor coated tear drainage tubes were used in 11 eyes by CDCR, whereas silicon tear drainage tubes were implanted into 2 eyes by CR and 6 eyes by CDCR. In group 1, proximal and distal obstructions developed postoperatively in 4 eyes, while 1 eye showed tube malposition and 3 eyes developed luminal obstruction by debris 3 times. In group 2, tube extrusion developed in 4 eyes, whereas tube malposition developed in 6 eyes and luminal obstruction by debris developed in 6 eyes at different times, for a total of 20 times.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the most significant complication we observed in the use of silicon tear drainage tubes was tube extrusion,whereas the leading complication related to the use of Medpor coated tear drainage tubes was tube obstruction.

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy and lacrimal sinus diversion via sinopsys surgical lacrimal stent: cadaveric proof of concept

PURPOSE

To determine the viability of lacrimal sinus diversion by using a novel Sinopsys Surgical Lacrimal Stent.

METHODS

Two disarticulated cadaveric heads were used in the laboratory. First, bilateral conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomies (CDCR) were performed by using a traditional Pyrex Jones tube and the Sinopsys Surgical Lacrimal Stent. The fluiditics were then evaluated by using contrast agent and fluroscopy. Subsequently, conjunctivoethmoidectomies (CE) and conjunctivomaxillectomies (CM) were performed by using the Sinopsys Surgical Lacrimal Stent, of which the fluiditics were also studied.

RESULTS

The conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) placement experience of the Jones tube and the Sinopsys Surgical Lacrimal Stent were similar. The CDCR fluiditics as measured by using contrast agent and fluoroscopy were identical with each draining 0.5 mL over 5 to 10 seconds. Placement of the Sinopsys Surgical Lacrimal Stent in the 4 ethmoid (CE) and 4 maxillary (CM) sinuses was similar to the CDCR experience. Fluiditics of lacrimal sinus diversion were similar to CDCR with drainage of 0.5 mL over 5 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

The Sinopsys Surgical Lacrimal Stent has flow characteristics that are similar to a Pyrex Jones tube. Drainage in the nose via a CDCR procedure is similar to drainage in the ethmoid and maxillary sinuses via a CE and CM, respectively.

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy using a high-density porous polyethylene-coated tear drain tube

To evaluate the outcome of conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy using a high-density porous polyethylene (HDPP)-coated tear drain tube. Patients with epiphora due to a proximal lacrimal system block were included in a prospective interventional case study. A total of 22 eyes were treated with lacrimal bypass surgery using the HDPP-coated tube. On follow-up (12-41 months), 21 eyes had a patent well-positioned tube with subjective relief of epiphora. In one eye, a loose sleeve was noted during surgery. The tube dislodged postoperatively and was removed. A high success rate with only a few minor complications is achievable using a HDPP-coated tear drain tube for lacrimal bypass surgery. Long-term follow-up is required to look for tube blockage due to conjunctival or nasal mucosal overgrowth.

A new instrument for Lester Jones tube placement in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy

A new trocar has been developed that increases the ease and accuracy of Lester Jones tube placement using the Cox system in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) surgery.