Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by retroviral vectors expressing monomeric and multimeric hammerhead ribozymes

A triplex ribozyme expression system based on a single hairpin ribozyme

Triplex ribozyme (RZ) configurations allow for the individual activity of trans-acting RZs in multiple expression cassettes (multiplex), thereby increasing target cleavage relative to conventionally expressed RZs. Although hairpin RZs have been advantageously compared to hammerhead RZs, their longer size and structural features complicated triplex design. We present a triplex expression system based on a single hairpin RZ with transcleavage capability and simple engineering. The system was tested in vitro using cis- and trans-cleavage kinetic assays against a known target RNA from HPV-16 E6/E7 mRNA. Single and multiplex triplex RZ constructs were more efficient in cleaving the target than tandem-cloned hairpin RZs, suggesting that the release of individual RZs enhanced trans-cleavage kinetics. Multiplex systems constructed with two different hairpin RZs resulted in better trans-cleavage compared to standard double-RZ constructs. In addition, the triplex RZ performed cis- and trans-cleavage in cervical cancer cells. The use of triplex configurations with multiplex RZs permit differential targeting of the same or different RNA, thus improving potential use against unstable targets. This prototype will provide the basis for the development of future RZ-based therapies and technologies.

Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus-1 entry using vectors expressing a multimeric hammerhead ribozyme targeting the CCR5 mRNA

Rz1–7is a multimeric hammerhead ribozyme targeting seven unique sites within the human CCR5 mRNA that is activein vitro. Mouse stem cell virus-based MGIN and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-based HEG1 vectors were used to express Rz1–7in a human CD4+T lymphoid cell line. Stable transductants expressed Rz1–7, which was further shown to be active, since CCR5 mRNA and surface CCR5 protein expression levels decreased. High levels of progeny virus were produced when the transduced cells were challenged with an X4-tropic HIV-1 (NL4-3) strain, suggesting that Rz1–7expression does not affect X4-tropic virus replication. When the transduced cells expressing Rz1–7were challenged with the R5-tropic HIV-1 (BaL) strain, 99–100 % inhibition of progeny virus production was observed for the duration of the experiment (∼2 months). When the cells were precultured for 2–3 months prior to HIV-1 infection, inhibition was more prominent in cells transduced with MGIN-Rz1–7than with HEG1-Rz1–7. Inhibition occurred at the level of viral entry, as no HIV-1 DNA could be detected. These results demonstrate that Rz1–7confers excellent inhibition of R5-tropic HIV-1 replication at the level of entry. Therefore, we anticipate that this multimeric ribozyme will be beneficial for HIV-1 gene therapy.

Efficacy and mode of action of hammerhead and hairpin ribozymes against various HIV-1 target sites

Ribozymes have been proposed as gene therapy agents against HIV-1, although many fundamental questions about their mechanism of action remain unclear. Few studies have compared directly the potential of different modified ribozyme species against a particular target. Here we compare the relative abilities of hammerhead (HhU5) and hairpin (HpU5) ribozymes directed against a well-studied target RNA that has therapeutic potential, located in the untranslated 5' region (U5), to inhibit HIV-1 replication. The two types of ribozymes showed similar antiviral efficacy after being stably transfected into HUT78 cells and subsequently challenged with HIV-1(SF2), but the HhU5 ribozyme showed faster cleavage kinetics when tested in a cell-free system. In the second part of this study, we examined whether different ribozymes were able to inhibit the integration of proviral DNA in infected HUT78 cells. We found that cell pools stably expressing HpU5 could limit the appearance of integrated provirus, indicating that they could inhibit the infecting viral RNA before reverse transcription. A preintegration effect was also found for cell pools expressing a ribozyme targeting the nef gene (HhNef) or a ribozyme targeting the LTR (HhLTR). However, no discernible preintegration effects were seen for the HhU5 ribozyme or an active ribozyme directed against an RNA target site in the pol gene (HhPol). Thus, the results suggest that the mode of ribozyme action varied between sites and is not dependent solely on inhibiting the infecting viral RNA. Evidence for a preintegration effect is extremely encouraging and indicates that "resistant" cells have some chance to repopulate the immune system through such a selective advantage. We also studied the ability of the different ribozymes to down regulate viral RNA postintegration.

Genetic therapy for HIV/AIDS

Despite the tremendous success of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) introduced nearly 8 years ago for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), innovative therapies, including gene transfer approaches, are still required for nearly half of the general patient population. A number of potential gene therapeutic targets for HIV have been identified and include both viral and cellular genes essential for viral replication. The diverse methods used to inhibit viral replication comprise RNA-based strategies such as ribozymes, RNA decoys, antisense messenger RNAs and small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules. Other potential anti-HIV genes include dominant negative viral proteins, intracellular antibodies, intrakines and suicide genes, all of which have had a modicum of success in vitro. Cellular targets include CD4+ T cells, macrophages and their progenitors. The greatest gene transfer efficiency has been achieved using retroviral or, more recently, lentiviral vectors. A limited number of Phase I clinical trials suggest that the general method is safe. It is proposed that a national network for HIV gene therapy (similar to the AIDS Clinical Trial Groups) may be the best way to determine which approaches should proceed clinically.

Gene therapy of HIV-1 infection using lentiviral vectors expressing anti-HIV-1 genes

The use of vectors based on primate lentiviruses for gene therapy of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection has many potential advantages over the previous murine retroviral vectors used for delivery of genes that inhibit replication of HIV-1. First, lentiviral vectors have the ability to transduce dividing and nondividing cells that constitute the targets of HIV-1 infection such as resting T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. Lentiviral vectors can also transfer genes to hematopoietic stem cells with a superior gene transfer efficiency and without affecting the repopulating capacity of these cells. Second, these vectors could be potentially mobilized in vivo by the wild-type virus to secondary target cells, thus expanding the protection to previously untransduced cells. And finally, lentiviral vector backbones have the ability to block HIV-1 replication by several mechanisms that include sequestration of the regulatory proteins Tat and Rev, competition for packaging into virions, and by inhibition of reverse transcription in heterodimeric virions with possible generation of nonfunctional recombinants between the vector and viral genomes. The inhibitory ability of lentiviral vectors can be further increased by expression of anti-HIV-1 genes. In this case, the lentiviral vector packaging system has to be modified to become resistant to the anti-HIV-1 genes expressed by the vector in order to avoid self-inhibition of the vector packaging system during vector production. This review focuses on the use of lentiviral vectors as the main agents to mediate inhibition of HIV-1 replication and discusses the different genetic intervention strategies for gene therapy of HIV-1 infection.

Therapeutic targeting of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 latency: current clinical realities and future scientific possibilities

Factors affecting HIV-1 latency present formidable obstacles for therapeutic intervention. As these obstacles have become a clinical reality, even with the use of potent anti-retroviral regimens, the need for novel therapeutic strategies specifically targeting HIV-1 latency is evident. However, therapeutic targeting of HIV-1 latency requires an understanding of the mechanisms regulating viral quiescence and activation. These mechanisms have been partially delineated using chronically infected cell models and, clearly, HIV-1 activation from latency involves several key viral and cellular components. Among these distinctive therapeutic targets, cellular factors involved in HIV-1 transcription especially warrant further consideration for rational drug design. Exploring the scientific possibilities of new therapies targeting HIV-1 latency may hold new promise of eventual HIV-1 eradication.

Ribozyme therapy for HIV infection

Within the past few years encouraging progress has been made in the treatment of HIV-1 infection, largely due to the combined use of HIV-1 protease inhibitors with nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Despite this, HIV-1 infection is still a major global problem and the emergence of a drug resistant virus is ever present. There is a continuing need to develop new therapeutic strategies as well as improve upon all forms of existing therapies for the treatment of this viral infection. It has now been almost a decade since the first demonstration that ribozymes can effectively inhibit HIV-1 infectious spread in cell culture. Since then, ribozymes have progressed into human clinical trials primarily through gene therapy approaches. This progression brings ribozymes into the forefront as an important addition to the growing arsenal of anti-HIV-1 weapons. The following review covers the developments in anti-HIV-1 ribozyme usage over the past decade and summarizes the current state of ribozyme development for the purpose of inhibiting HIV-1 infection.

Retrovirally expressed anti-HIV ribozymes confer a selective survival advantage on CD4+ T cells in vitro

To date, a selective advantage of cells expressing anti-HIV ribozymes has not been shown. This study was undertaken to determine whether such a selective advantage can be demonstrated in vitro. A retroviral vector coding for a hairpin ribozyme targeting the HIV 5'LTR and for the low affinity nerve growth factor receptor (LNGF-RDelta) was designed. Since we demonstrated by RT-PCR that the amount of ribozyme transcripts was highly correlated with the level of surface LNGF-RDelta expression, the vector was utilized to assess ribozyme expression by flow cytometry. Transduced Hut78 and primary CD4+ T cells were purified and subsequently mixed with unmodified cells. After HIV challenge the percentage of ribozyme expressing cells in the cell mixture was monitored by flow cytometry. Twenty-one days after HIV infection the proportion of ribozyme expressing CD4+ T cells was 2.6 times higher in comparison to cells with the control vector. CD4+ T cells with a strong ribozyme expression conferred a 7.4-fold selective advantage at day 21 and a 11.7-fold at day 28. For Hut78 cells a selective advantage was detected exclusively for strongly ribozyme expressing cells. As a mechanism underlying the selective advantage an inhibition of HIV induced apoptosis was shown. These results demonstrate that anti-HIV ribozymes are able to confer a selective survival advantage and indicate that the protective effect is dependent on the amount of ribozyme expression. Gene Therapy (2000) 7, 408-416.

Ribozymes and the anti-gene therapy: how a catalytic RNA can be used to inhibit gene function

Ribozymes are RNA molecules that possess the dual properties of RNA sequence-specific recognition and site-specific cleavage of other RNA molecules. These properties provide powerful tools for studies requiring gene inhibition, when the DNA sequence is known. The use of these molecules goes beyond basic research, with a potential impact in therapeutical practice in medicine in the near future. In this review, we briefly describe the progress towards developing this class of molecules and its applications for the control of gene expression.

Expression of ribozymes in gene transfer systems to modulate target RNA levels

The possibility of designing ribozymes to cleave any specific target RNA has rendered them valuable tools in both basic research and therapeutic applications. In the therapeutics area, they have been exploited to target viral RNAs in infectious diseases, dominant oncogenes in cancers and specific somatic mutations in genetic disorders. Most notably, several ribozyme gene therapy protocols for HIV patients are already in Phase 1 trials. More recently, ribozymes have been used for transgenic animal research, gene target validation and pathway elucidation.

Co-packaging of sense and antisense RNAs: a novel strategy for blocking HIV-1 replication

Retroviral vectors were engineered to express either sense (MoTiN-TRPsie+) or sense and antisense (MoTN-TRPsie+/-) RNAs containing the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) trans -activation response (TAR) element and the extended packaging (Psie) signal. The Psie signal includes the dimer linkage structure (DLS) and the Rev response element (RRE). Amphotropic vector particles were used to transduce a human CD4+ T-lymphoid (MT4) cell line. Stable transductants were then tested for sense and antisense RNA production and susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. HIV-1 production was significantly decreased in cells transduced with MoTiN-TRPsie+ and MoTN-TRPsie+/-vectors. Efficient packaging of sense and most remarkably of antisense RNA was observed within the virus progeny. Infectivity of this virus was significantly decreased in both cases, suggesting that the interfering RNAs were co-packaged with HIV-1 RNA. Vector transduction was not expected to occur and was not observed. Inhibition of HIV-1 replication was also demonstrated in human peripheral blood lymphocytes transduced with retroviral vectors expressing antisense RNA. These results suggest that (i) both sense and antisense RNAs were co-packaged with HIV-1 RNA, (ii) the co-packaged sense and antisense RNAs inhibited virus infectivity and (iii) the co-packaged sense and antisense RNAs were not transduced. Sense and antisense RNA-based strategies may also be used to co-package other interfering RNAs (e.g. ribozymes) to cleave HIV-1 virion RNA.