Evidence-based medicine reports on obesity surgery: a critique

Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Uric Acid Levels in Patients with Obesity: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hyperuricemia in obese individuals with or without metabolic syndrome and assess the impact of sleeve gastrectomy surgery on the amelioration of hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on patients with obesity who were candidates for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. These patients were diligently followed for 1 year after the surgical procedure. The assessment of hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome was carried out both before and one year after the surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients (30 males and 168 females) underwent sleeve gastrectomy. After 1 year, there was a notable decline in the prevalence of hyperuricemia, decreasing from 77 to 36 cases (a reduction of 46.75%) among females and from 18 to 8 cases (a reduction of 44.44%) among males. Prior to the surgery, 60.6% of patients (120 out of 198) were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, and 36.7% of these patients exhibited improvements in their metabolic syndrome status. Among individuals with metabolic syndrome, significant enhancements were observed in various anthropometric and laboratory measurements, including reductions in hypertriglyceridemia, hyperuricemia, and hypercholesteremia. A logistic regression analysis revealed that in females, changes in creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), weight loss, body mass index (BMI), and triglyceride reduction all had a notable impact on the likelihood of recovering from hyperuricemia.

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore the clinical relevance of this surgical intervention in managing obesity-related conditions.

Employment status and sick-leave following obesity surgery: a five-year prospective cohort study

Background. Severe obesity is a risk factor for lower participation in paid work, but whether employment increases and sick leave decreases after obesity surgery is not well documented. Methods. We assessed 224 Norwegian patients with severe obesity (mean age: 40; mean BMI: 49; 61% female) regarding employment status (working versus not working) and the number of days of sick leave during the preceding 12 months, before and five years after obesity surgery (75% follow-up rate). Logistic regression analysis was used to study preoperative predictors of employment status after surgery. Results. There were no change in the employment rate over time (54% versus 58%), but the number of days of sick leave per year was significantly reduced, from a mean of 63 to a mean of 26, and from a median of 36 to a median of 4. Most of this change was attributable to patients with zero days of sick leave, which increased from 25% to 41%. Being female, older, having low education level, receiving disability pension and not being employed before obesity surgery were important risk factors for not being employed after obesity surgery. The type of obesity surgery, BMI and marital status were not useful predictors. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that undergoing obesity surgery is not associated with a higher rate of employment, although it may reduce the number of days of sick leave. Additional interventions are likely needed to influence the employment status of these patients. The significant preoperative predictors of not being employed in this study provide suggestions for further research.

Five-year changes in health-related quality of life after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch

Background

Long-term data of health-related quality of life (HRQL) after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS) procedure are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in HRQL from baseline to 5 years after BPDDS.

Methods

Fifty morbidly obese patients were followed for 5 years after BPDDS procedure. The sample consisted of 27 women and 23 men, the mean age was 37.8 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 51.7 units. HRQL was measured with the Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Anxiety and depression were measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Linear mixed model was used to investigate the change scores. The SF-36 scores and HADS scores of the sample were also compared with a Norwegian population norm, adjusted for age, gender, and BMI.

Results

Mental summary scores (MCS) and physical summary scores (PCS) were very low preoperatively but significantly improved (P < 0.05) 5 years after surgery. The PCS was comparable to the population norm, while MCS was lower. Depression improved significantly from baseline to the 5-year follow-up (P = 0.004), but anxiety did not (P = 0.595).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a sustained weight loss and improved, although somewhat fading, HRQL scores 5 years after BPDDS. The study also shows that BPDDS is associated with a sustained reduction in depression symptoms but not in anxiety symptoms.

Misuse of odds ratios in obesity literature: an empirical analysis of published studies

Odds ratios (ORs) are widely used in scientific research to demonstrate the associations between outcome variables and covariates (risk factors) of interest, and are often described in language suitable for risks or probabilities, but odds and probabilities are related, not equivalent. In situations where the outcome is not rare (e.g., obesity), ORs no longer approximate the relative risk ratio (RR) and may be misinterpreted. Our study examines the extent of misinterpretation of ORs in Obesity and International Journal of Obesity. We reviewed all 2010 issues of these journals to identify all articles that presented ORs. Included articles were then primarily reviewed for correct presentation and interpretation of ORs; and secondarily reviewed for article characteristics that may have been associated with how ORs are presented and interpreted. Of the 855 articles examined, 62 (7.3%) presented ORs. ORs were presented incorrectly in 23.2% of these articles. Clinical articles were more likely to present ORs correctly than social science or basic science articles. Studies with outcome variables that had higher relative prevalence were less likely to present ORs correctly. Overall, almost one-quarter of the studies presenting ORs in two leading journals on obesity misinterpreted them. Furthermore, even when researchers present ORs correctly, the lay media may misinterpret them as relative RRs. Therefore, we suggest that when the magnitude of associations is of interest, researchers should carefully and accurately present interpretable measures of association--including RRs and risk differences--to minimize confusion and misrepresentation of research results.

Severe obesity: the neglected epidemic

Severe obesity (SO) is increasing faster than obesity in adults and in children. Because it is associated with numerous comorbidities, SO accounts for more health care expenditures than any other medical condition. Furthermore, it is associated with poor pregnancy outcomes for mother, fetus, and infant and a high risk of offspring obesity carried into adulthood. Bariatric surgery is the treatment of choice for SO because nonoperative methods fail to provide medically significant durable weight loss and because it is both preventive and therapeutic. The number of operations has sharply increased globally, yet only a small fraction of eligible patients are referred for surgical treatment demonstrating the need for improved access, especially for those disproportionately affected by SO. The risks of surgery mandate careful postoperative long-term multidisciplinary follow-up care. Education is critical for truly informed consent and must continue postoperatively, especially for women with reproductive potential. Even so, surgical treatment of SO remains cost-effective compared to conventional nonoperative treatment, which also requires long-term care. Just as obesity affects all medical disciplines (from allergology and immunology to oncology, urology and women's health), so does postoperative management of bariatric surgery patients. We offer wide-ranging recommendations for policymakers and others to consider in addressing SO.

Anxiety and depression in association with morbid obesity: changes with improved physical health after duodenal switch

BACKGROUND

Patients with morbid obesity have an increased risk for anxiety and depression. The "duodenal switch" is perhaps the most effective obesity surgery procedure for inducing weight loss. However, to our knowledge, data on symptoms of anxiety and depression after the duodenal switch are lacking. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that self-reported physical health is the major predictor of symptoms of depression in patients with morbid obesity. We therefore investigated the symptoms of anxiety and depression before and after the duodenal switch procedure and whether post-operative changes in self-reported physical health were predictive of changes in these symptoms.

METHODS

Data were assessed before surgery (n = 50), and one (n = 47) and two (n = 44) years afterwards. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed by the "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale", and self-reported physical health was assessed by the "Short-Form 36" questionnaire. Linear mixed effect models were used to investigate changes in the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Correlation and linear multiple regression analyses were used to study whether changes in self-reported physical health were predictive of post-operative changes in the symptoms of anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

The symptom burden of anxiety and depression were high before surgery but were normalized one and two years afterwards (P < 0.001). The degree of improvement in self-reported physical health was associated with statistically significant reductions in the symptoms of anxiety (P = 0.003) and depression (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The novelty of this study is the large and sustained reductions in the symptoms of anxiety and depression after the duodenal switch procedure, and that these changes were closely associated with improvements in self-reported physical health.

Best practices in policy and access (coding and reimbursement) for weight loss surgery

To update evidence-based best practice guidelines for coding and reimbursement and establish policy and access standards for weight loss surgery (WLS). Systematic search of English-language literature on WLS and health-care policy, access, insurance reimbursement, coding, private payers, public policy, and mandated benefits published between April 2004 and May 2007 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Use of key words to narrow the search for a selective review of abstracts, retrieval of full articles, and grading of evidence according to systems used in established evidence-based models. We identified 51 publications in our literature search; the 20 most relevant were examined in detail. These included reviews, cost-benefit analyses, and trend and cost studies from administrative databases. Literature on policy issues surrounding WLS are very sparse and largely focused on economic analyses. Reports on policy initiatives in the public and private arenas are primarily limited to narrative reviews of nonsurgical efforts to fight obesity. A substantial body of work shows that WLS improves or reverses most obesity-related comorbidities. Mounting evidence also indicates that WLS confers a significant survival advantage for those who undergo it. WLS is a viable and cost-effective treatment for an increasingly common disease, and policy decisions are more frequently being linked to incentives for national health-care goals. However, access to WLS often varies by payer and region. Currently, there are no uniform criteria for determining patient appropriateness for surgery.

Sleeve gastrectomy leads to Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

The role of Helicobacter pylori (HP) in patients scheduled and undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

Included were obese patients presenting to our institution for LSG over 24 months. All patients had presurgical HP breath test, and the symptomatic ones received triple therapy with symptom follow-up. Post surgery, all excluded stomachs were evaluated for HP, and those that were positive performed a second 13C-urea breath test (UBT) 3 months later.

RESULTS

Forty patients underwent LSG. Male to female sex ratio was 1:3; mean age-42 years; mean weight-122 kg; and mean BMI of 43.4 kg/m2. Presurgical HP was positive in 15 (37.5%) patients (11 symptomatic and four asymptomatic). Only these 11 patients were given HP eradication therapy and all experienced complete subsequent symptom resolution. HP was detected in 17 out of the 40 (42.5%) cases of excluded stomachs. All performed a 13C-UBT 3 months post operation and only three (17.6%) tested positive.

CONCLUSIONS

HP infection is frequent in biopsies from patients with previous LSG and the majority of follow-up 13C-UBT were negative. In our small initial sample, we treated only symptomatic patients preoperatively. Routine screening for HP for all LSG patients and/or treatment for all positive ones would subject patients to expensive and unnecessary investigations. We propose that this stomach-reducing, pylorus-preserving surgery might even lead to HP eradication. The clinical implications of HP and this gastrectomy for a non-neoplastic, non-peptic indication deserve further study.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity

The incidence of obesity is steadily rising, and it has been estimated that 40% of the US population will be obese by the year 2025 if the current trend continues. In recent years there has been renewed interest in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity in concomitance with the epidemic of obesity. Bariatric surgery proved effective in providing weight loss of large magnitude, correction of comorbidities and excellent short-term and long-term outcomes, decreasing overall mortality and providing a marked survival advantage. The Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) has increased in popularity and is currently very “trendy” among laparoscopic surgeons involved in bariatric surgery. As LSG proved to be effective in achieving considerable weight loss in the short-term, it has been proposed by some as a sole bariatric procedure. This editorial focuses on the particular advantages of LSG in the treatment of morbid obesity.

Bariatric surgery in Australia: who, why and how?

A review of published reports was conducted to identify gaps in the research regarding bariatric surgery. Much of the research that has been conducted is clinical outcome based; however, little research has been conducted in many key areas. Data on the demographics of the bariatric surgery group are patchy at best. The role of best practice and evidence-based medicine in bariatric surgery seems to be poorly understood, and equity issues and the role of clinical pathways in bariatric surgery need to be clarified. Significant gaps were identified in the published reports regarding pathways to bariatric surgery and multidisciplinary team use. Additionally, much of the published report and research data were from US studies, as few Australian studies have been conducted. Further research and policy and practice developments in bariatric surgery are needed, especially with regard to the Australian context.

Surgical treatment of obesity

Obesity is very prevalent. Most treatments fail owing to hard-wired survival mechanisms, linking stress and appetite, which have become grossly maladaptive in the industrial era. Antiobesity (bariatric) surgery is a seemingly drastic, efficacious therapy for this serious disease of energy surfeit. Technical progress during the last two decades has greatly improved its safety. The surgical principles of gastric restriction and/or gastrointestinal diversion have remained largely unchanged over 40 years, although mechanisms of action have been elucidated concomitant with advances in knowledge of the molecular biology of energy balance and appetite regulation. Results of bariatric surgery in large case-series followed for at least 10 years consistently demonstrate amelioration of components of the insulin-resistance metabolic syndrome and other comorbidities, significantly improving quality of life. Furthermore, bariatric surgery has convincingly been demonstrated to reduce mortality compared with nonoperative methods. This surgery requires substantial preoperative and postoperative evaluation, teaching, and monitoring to optimize outcomes. In the absence of effective societal changes to restore a healthy energy balance, bariatric surgery is an important tool for treating a very serious disease.

Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes

The prevalence of obesity has increased in recent decades, and obesity is now one of the leading public health concerns on a worldwide scale. There is accumulating agreement that bariatric surgery is currently the most efficacious and enduring treatment for clinically severe obesity, and as a result, the number of bariatric surgery procedures performed has risen dramatically in recent years. This review will summarize historic and contemporary bariatric surgical techniques, including gastric bypass (open and laparoscopic), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and biliopancreatic diversion (with or without duodenal switch). Data are presented on bariatric surgery outcomes, focusing on weight loss and obesity-related comorbidities. We also review possible complications from surgery. Bariatric surgery patients undergo many dramatic lifestyle changes, and comprehensive presurgical screening conducted by a multidisciplinary team is important to prepare patients for the numerous changes necessary for successful outcome. In addition, comprehensive presurgical screening can aid the treatment team in identifying patients who would benefit from additional services prior to or following surgery. Further research focused on presurgical variables that predict outcome-especially the longer term outcome-of bariatric surgery is needed. At present, approximately 1% of eligible individuals with morbid obesity receive bariatric surgery. In addition, there appears to be inequity in access to weight loss surgery. Given the accumulating evidence that bariatric surgery is efficacious in producing significant and durable weight loss, improving obesity-related comorbidities, and extending survival, the U.S. healthcare system should examine ways to improve access to this treatment for obesity.

A nationwide survey on bariatric surgery in France: two years prospective follow-up

BACKGROUND

Most studies on bariatric surgery outcomes have been performed in clinical trials (eg. the SOS) or reflect the clinical experience and practice of specific and experienced centers. Little is known about the current practice at a nationwide level.

METHODS

This is a systematic nationwide study on the 2-year outcome of all consecutive 1,236 bariatric operations performed in France. Data on mortality, weight loss, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected independently from the medical and surgical team involved in the patients' care.

RESULTS

87.3% of the patients underwent an adjustable gastric banding (ABG), 8.6% a vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), 3.8% a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and 0.3% a biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). Loss of follow-up was 12% at year 1 and 18% at year 2. The rate of laparoscopic procedures was 98% for ABG and 73% for RYGBP. Mortality rate was 0.16% in the operative period and 0.27% during follow-up. Excess weight loss ranged from 43% (AGB) to 66% (RYGBP). Co-morbidities improved in more than 70% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of bariatric surgery in routine practice (mortality, weight loss, course of co-morbidities, and quality of life) are similar to the results published in clinical trials.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for BMI <35 kg/m2: a tailored approach

BACKGROUND

Patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m(2) who are obese, have uncontrolled co-morbidities, and have tried to lose weight with no success do not meet the "traditional" criteria for obesity surgery, and no other treatment is being offered to them.

METHODS

A total of 37 obese patients (30 women and 7 men) had been undergoing clinical treatment with no resolution or improvement of their life-threatening co-morbidities. The mean BMI was 32.5 kg/m(2). Their age ranged from 28 to 45 years. All patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and lipid disorder. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was present in 7 patients and sleep apnea in 3. These patients underwent the same preoperative evaluation as other patients for gastric bypass. The patients were required to have approval from their primary care physician. All patients provided written informed consent. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed. After extensive explanation and documentation, the Brazilian insurance companies approved the procedure in 3 cases, and international (non-American) insurance companies approved the procedure in 4 cases.

RESULTS

The follow-up range was 6-48 months. The mean excess weight loss was 81%. Thirty-six patients had total remission of their co-morbidities. One patient still had mild hypertension, but with a reduction in the number of antihypertensive drugs used. No surgery-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Obese patients with a BMI of <35 kg/m(2) and severe co-morbidities can benefit from laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This treatment option should be offered to this group of patients.

A description of morbidly obese state employees requesting a bariatric operation

BACKGROUND

The federal government, the medical insurance industry, and the academic medical community have disagreed over what treatments are appropriate and cost effective for morbid obesity. This debate is hindered by inadequate data regarding the true costs of diseases and who chooses an operation as a treatment option. The purpose of this study was to obtain these costs and to describe this population.

METHODS

Louisiana's managed medical insurance program created primarily for its civil service employees contracted to offer a small random group of morbidly obese employees the option of a bariatric operation. This observational study examined the subpopulation who requested consideration for the operation. We present historic cost data from all medical expenses paid by the insurance company, a telephone survey of the volunteers in the study to determine their medical problems, and diagnostic evaluation data on those employees randomized to proceed for possible bariatric operation.

RESULTS

A total of 911 of 189,398 adult members of the insurance plan wanted to be considered for this study. Only 397, however, completed the informed-consent process. Of the 248 employees who met the age requirement, body mass index criteria, and health criteria to be considered for a bariatric operation and were randomized, 20 withdrew before obtaining 40 committed operative candidates. The 773 morbidly obese female members had used a mean of dollar 11,145 in medical insurance expenses in the year 2003 versus a mean of dollar 8,096 for the other 106,908 adult women. Similar values for the men were dollar 16,720 for the 138 morbidly obese men versus dollar 5,943 for the other 82,490 men.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidly obese members of this medical insurance plan who requested a bariatric operation are costing their plan 1.4 to 2.8 times the yearly amount of the other adult members in medical expenses. The yearly mean amount the insurance plan spends on these members suggests that operative treatment would pay for itself in a relatively few number of years if it could significantly reduce these costs. Even in those who consider bariatric operation, many withdraw, further limiting the costs of operative therapy.