Antigen specificity in subsets of mucous membrane pemphigoid

Autoimmune bullous diseases: pathogenesis and clinical management

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) represent a heterogeneous group of immune-mediated disorders characterized by life-threatening blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. This Review synthesizes current understanding of AIBD pathogenesis, clinical phenotypes, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies, emphasizing recent advancements and translational opportunities. At the core of AIBDs is autoantibody-mediated disruption of structural proteins in the epidermis or basement membrane zone, particularly at desmosomal and hemidesmosomal junctions. Key subtypes, including pemphigus, paraneoplastic pemphigus, pemphigoid, and IgA-related diseases, are distinguished by their target antigens, clinical manifestations, and immunopathological profiles. Diagnostic workflows rely on direct immunofluorescence, and serological assays, yet subtype differentiation remains challenging due to overlapping features. Traditional therapies, such as systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, have improved outcomes but are limited by toxicity. Recent breakthroughs highlight targeted interventions, including B-cell depletion with rituximab, cytokine modulation via dupilumab, and JAK inhibitors for inflammatory pathways. Innovative strategies like chimeric autoantibody receptor T-cell (CAART) therapy further address refractory cases by eliminating autoreactive B cells. Additionally, the Review underscores the emerging role of inflammation-driven mechanisms and the necessity of multidisciplinary care, given AIBDs' associations with malignancies, autoimmune comorbidities. Despite progress, challenges persist in early diagnosis, personalized therapy optimization, and understanding antigen-specific immune responses. Future directions include refining diagnostic biomarkers, exploring novel targets, and developing precision medicine approaches.

The Role of Serology in the Diagnosis of Ocular Predominant Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid and the Search for an Ocular-Specific Autoantigen

Ocular predominant mucous membrane pemphigoid (oMMP) is a severe subtype of MMP that can lead to scarring and blindness. While conjunctival biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, limited sensitivity results in a false-negative rate upwards of 40%. Likewise, it remains unclear to what extent a negative biopsy, whether false-negative or true-negative, results in a different prognosis, with patients previously termed "pseudopemphigoid" demonstrating comparable disease progression. Serologic testing allows for a less invasive means to demonstrate circulating autoantibodies against known autoantigens in pemphigoid diseases. Patients with MMP, particularly oMMP, however, typically demonstrate low titers of circulating autoantibodies, limiting the diagnostic utility of these tests. The autoantigen integrin β4 has been previously reported to be a specific marker of pure ocular MMP, while in the majority of patients with oMMP, the identified target antigens are BP180 (type XVII collagen) and laminin 332. Recent studies have, however, demonstrated inconsistent reactivity and specificity for integrin β4 as an ocular-specific marker in MMP. Herein, we review the role of serologic testing in the diagnosis and prognosis of oMMP, as well as the current understanding of autoantigens in oMMP.Abbreviations: BMZ - basement membrane zone, DIF - direct immunofluorescence, IIF - indirect immunofluorescence, MMP - mucous membrane pemphigoid, oMMP - ocular predominant mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Bullous pemphigoid and mucous membrane pemphigoid humoral responses differ in reactivity towards BP180 midportion and BP230

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) and mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) are rare autoimmune blistering disorders characterized by autoantibodies (autoAbs) targeting dermo-epidermal junction components such as BP180 and BP230. The differential diagnosis, based on both the time of appearance and the extension of cutaneous and/or mucosal lesions, is crucial to distinguish these diseases for improving therapy outcomes and delineating the correct prognosis; however, in some cases, it can be challenging. In addition, negative results obtained by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with BP and MMP sera, especially from patients with ocular involvement, often delay diagnosis and treatment, leading to a greater risk of poor outcomes.

Objectives

Our aim was to find potentially different reactivity profiles in BP and MMP and improve available approaches for diagnosis with focus on ocular MMP.

Methods

Two cohorts of 90 BP and 90 MMP, recruited from different Italian clinical centers, were characterized also employing a novel ELISA based on the BP180 extracellular domain (ECD-BP180).

Results

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) reactivity to BP180 and BP230 in MMP sera was significantly reduced in comparison with BP, mostly affecting BP230 and E-1080 (53% and 36% in BP vs. 11% and 3% in MMP, respectively, p < 0.0001). The combined sensitivity of BP180-NC16A and ECD-BP180 ELISAs was greater compared to BP180-NC16A and BP230 ELISAs both in BP (97% and 92%, respectively) and in MMP (42% and 31%, respectively). The present study shows that MMP patients with ocular involvement rarely reacted to BP180 by IgG in contrast with patients with oral and/or cutaneous involvement (p = 0.0245 and p = 0.0377, respectively), suggesting that an oral and/or cutaneous MMP positive to BP180 hardly evolves to ocular MMP. Of note, one-third of ocular MMP showed immunoglobulin A (IgA) reactivity to ECD-BP180 by immunoblotting.

Conclusions

The present study provides several hints to perform a correct and timely diagnosis in BP and MMP, which is crucial for improving therapy outcomes and delineating the correct prognosis.

Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Demonstrates a Distinct Autoantibody Profile from Those of Other Autoimmune Blistering Diseases: A Preliminary Study

Background: Ocular predominant mucous membrane pemphigoid (oMMP) is a severe subtype of autoimmune blistering disease (AIBD), which can result in scarring and vision loss. The diagnosis of oMMP is challenging as patients often have undetectable levels of circulating autoantibodies by conventional assays. Likewise, the principal autoantigen in oMMP has been an area of debate. Methods: In this preliminary experiment, we performed Phage Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (PhIP-seq) on sera from patients with oMMP, as well as non-ocular MMP, bullous pemphigoid, and mucocutaneous-type pemphigus vulgaris. Results: We identified several autoantigens unique to oMMP relative to other AIBDs. We then cross-referenced these antigens against previously published single-nuclei datasets, as well as the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium Database. Several protein hits identified in our study demonstrated enriched expression on the anterior surface epithelia, including TNKS1BP1, SEC16B, FNBP4, CASZ1, GOLGB1, DOT1L, PRDM 15, LARP4B, and RPL6. Likewise, a previous study of mouse knockout models of murine analogs CASZ1, HIP1, and ELOA2 reported that these mice showed abnormalities in terms of the ocular surface and development in the eyes. Notably, PhIP-seq failed to identify the canonical markers of AIBDs such as BP180, BP230, desmogleins 1 and 3, or integrin β4, indicating that the patient autoantibodies react with conformational epitopes rather than linear epitopes. Conclusions: oMMP patients demonstrate a unique autoantibody repertoire relative to the other AIBDs. Further validation of the identified autoantibodies will shed light on their potentially pathogenic role.

Genetic predisposition to ocular surface disorders and opportunities for gene-based therapies

The ocular surface, comprised of the corneal and conjunctival epithelium, innervation system, immune components, and tear-film apparatus, plays a key role in ocular integrity as well as comfort and vision. Gene defects may result in congenital ocular or systemic disorders with prominent ocular surface involvement. Examples include epithelial corneal dystrophies, aniridia, ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting (EEC) syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy. In addition, genetic factors may interact with environmental risk factors in the development of several multifactorial ocular surface disorders (OSDs) such as autoimmune disorders, allergies, neoplasms, and dry eye disease. Advanced gene-based technologies have already been introduced in disease modelling and proof-of-concept gene therapies for monogenic OSDs. For instance, patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells have been used for modelling aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK), XP, and EEC syndrome. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has been used for disease modelling and/or gene therapy for AAK and Meesmann's epithelial corneal dystrophy. A better understanding of the role of genetic factors in OSDs may be helpful in designing personalized disease models and treatment approaches. Gene-based approaches in monogenic OSDs and genetic predisposition to multifactorial OSDs such as immune-mediated disorders and neoplasms with known or possible genetic risk factors has been seldom reviewed. In this narrative review, we discuss the role of genetic factors in monogenic and multifactorial OSDs and potential opportunities for gene therapy.

DISEASE ENDOTYPES PREDICT SEVERITY OF MUCOUS MEMBRAND PEMPHIGOID

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune disease with variable clinical presentation and multiple autoantigens. To determine if disease endotypes could be identified based on the pattern of serum reactivity, the clinical and diagnostic information of 70 MMP patients was collected, and reactivity to dermal or epidermal antigens, using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), and specific reactivity to BP180, BP230, collagen VII and laminin 332 was evaluated. Most patients had lesions at multiple mucosae with the most prevalent being the oropharyngeal (mouth, gingiva, pharynx, 98.6%), followed by ocular (38.6%), nasal (32.9%), genital or anal (31.4%), laryngeal (20%), and esophageal (2.9%) sites, and skin (45.7%). Autoantigen profiling identified BP180 (71%) as the most common autoantigen, followed by laminin 332 (21.7%), collagen VII (13%), and BP230 IgG (11.6%). Reactivity to dermal antigens predicted a more severe disease characterized by a higher number of total sites involved, especially high-risk sites, and a decreased response to rituximab (RTX). In most cases, identification of dermal IIF reactivity is an accurate predictor of disease course; however, confirmation of laminin 332 reactivity is important with dermal IIF positivity due to an increased risk of solid tumors. Additionally, the ocular mucosae should be monitored in patients with IgA on DIF.

Native autoantigen complex detects pemphigoid autoantibodies

Pemphigoid diseases are a group of autoimmune disorders characterized by subepidermal blistering in the skin and mucosa. Among them, mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) autoantibodies are characterized by targeting multiple molecules in the hemidesmosomes, including collagen XVII, laminin-332, and integrin a6/β4. Traditionally, recombinant proteins of the autoantigens have been employed to identify circulating autoantibodies by immune assays. However, developing an efficient detection system for MMP autoantibodies has been challenging because the autoantibodies have heterogeneous profiles and the antibody titers are typically low. In this study, we introduce an ELISA that takes advantage of a native autoantigen complex rather than simple recombinant proteins. We generated HaCaT keratinocytes with a DDDDK-tag knocked in at the COL17A1 locus by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Immunoprecipitation using the DDDDK-tag isolated a native complex that contained full-length and processed collagen XVII and integrin α6/β4. Then, we used the complex proteins to prepare an ELISA system and enrolled 55 MMP cases to validate its diagnostic performance. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA for detecting MMP autoantibodies were 70.9% and 86.7%, respectively, far superior to those of conventional assays. In autoimmune diseases such as MMP, in which autoantibodies target various molecules, isolating the antigen-protein complexes can help establish a diagnostic system.

Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a clinically and immunopathologically heterogenous disease with an incidence of about 2/million inhabitants/year in central Europe. Pemphigoid diseases are characterized by autoantibodies against structural proteins of the epidermis and/or surface-close epithelia. MMP has been defined as pemphigoid disease with predominant mucosal lesions. Most frequently, the oral cavity and the conjunctivae are affected. Lesions outside the mouth tend to heal with scarring leading to visual impairment and finally blindness, as well as, more rarely, impairment of breathing and food intake. Autoantibodies target BP180 (collagen type XVII), laminin 332, BP230 (nearly always in conjunction with other antigens), and type VII collagen in about 75%, 10-20%, 10-30%, and <5% of MMP patients, respectively. While the main autoantibody isotype is IgG, additional, and less frequently, exclusive IgA autoantibodies can be detected in the majority of patients. Assaying for anti-laminin 332 reactivity is pivotal, since in about a quarter of patients with anti-laminin 332 MMP, a malignancy, mainly solid cancers, is associated. The pathophysiology of MMP is yet incompletely understood. A recent mouse model of anti-laminin 332 MMP replicating characteristic clinical and immunopathological findings of the human disease may be helpful to close this knowledge gap. Diagnosis is established by the clinical picture with predominant mucosal lesions and visualization of tissue-bound anti-basement membrane zone antibodies by direct immunofluorescence microscopy. In recent S3 guidelines initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, the clinical spectrum and diagnostic strategies are detailed. In addition, treatment regimens for different clinical situations including patients with exclusive oral or ocular involvement are outlined. Future studies are needed to better understand the clinal complexity and associations as well as to establish widely available diagnostic assays and evidence-based therapeutic strategies.

European Guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part II

This guideline has been initiated by the task force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, including physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline that systematically reviewed the literature on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until June 2019, with no limitations on language. While the first part of this guideline addressed methodology, as well as epidemiology, terminology, aetiology, clinical presentation and outcome measures in MMP, the second part presents the diagnostics and management of MMP. MMP should be suspected in cases with predominant mucosal lesions. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy to detect tissue-bound IgG, IgA and/or complement C3, combined with serological testing for circulating autoantibodies are recommended. In most patients, serum autoantibodies are present only in low levels and in variable proportions, depending on the clinical sites involved. Circulating autoantibodies are determined by indirect IF assays using tissue substrates, or ELISA using different recombinant forms of the target antigens or immunoblotting using different substrates. The major target antigen in MMP is type XVII collagen (BP180), although in 10-25% of patients laminin 332 is recognized. In 25-30% of MMP patients with anti-laminin 332 reactivity, malignancies have been associated. As first-line treatment of mild/moderate MMP, dapsone, methotrexate or tetracyclines and/or topical corticosteroids are recommended. For severe MMP, dapsone and oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide and/or oral corticosteroids are recommended as first-line regimens. Additional recommendations are given, tailored to treatment of single-site MMP such as oral, ocular, laryngeal, oesophageal and genital MMP, as well as the diagnosis of ocular MMP. Treatment recommendations are limited by the complete lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials.

European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part I

This guideline on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) has been elaborated by the Task Force for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) with a contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline encompassing a systematic review of the literature until June 2019 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. This first part covers methodology, the clinical definition of MMP, epidemiology, MMP subtypes, immunopathological characteristics, disease assessment and outcome scores. MMP describes a group of autoimmune skin and mucous membrane blistering diseases, characterized by a chronic course and by predominant involvement of the mucous membranes, such as the oral, ocular, nasal, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, laryngeal and oesophageal mucosa. MMP patients may present with mono- or multisite involvement. Patients' autoantibodies have been shown to be predominantly directed against BP180 (also called BPAG2, type XVII collagen), BP230, laminin 332 and type VII collagen, components of junctional adhesion complexes promoting epithelial stromal attachment in stratified epithelia. Various disease assessment scores are available, including the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), the Autoimmune Bullous Skin disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), the 'Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Assessment Tool' and the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS). Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including DLQI, ABQOL and TABQOL, can be used for assessment of quality of life to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and monitor disease course.

Laryngeal Pemphigoid Evolution and Response to Treatment

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present our experience in treating laryngeal pemphigoid (LP) patients, including disease course, treatment and treatment response, and to search for predictors of response to treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients with LP from March 2013 to August 2020 were reviewed. Potential relationships between disease severity and response to treatment and demographics, diagnosis, extent of laryngeal and extra-laryngeal involvement, comorbidities, immunostaining, and serology profile were explored.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included in the study (seven females, one male, mean age 79 years, mean follow-up 22 months). Diagnoses included mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP, n = 5), bullous pemphigoid (BP, n = 3). Two patients achieved complete laryngeal remission, four achieved partial remission, and two had no remission. The time to achieve laryngeal disease control was longer than for extra-laryngeal disease (P = 0.02). Potential associations were found between the absence of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-type auto-antibodies deposits in the basement membrane zone and a laryngeal disease that responded to topical corticosteroids and between the presence of BP180-C-terminal IgG auto-antibodies and a resistant rapidly progressive laryngeal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

LP has a spectrum of severity, variable response and is more resistant to treatment. The absence of IgG-type auto-antibodies may indicate a response to topical corticosteroids. Based on our limited observation, the presence of IgG-type auto-antibodies that target BP180-C-terminal domain may indicate a more severe scarring disease. Early recognition of these "high-risk patients" will allow early initiation of advanced systemic treatment that may prevent the irreversible effects of scarring.

The optimal oral biopsy site for diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Accepted 'standard practice' for the diagnosis of immunobullous disease is a perilesional sample for direct immunofluorescence (DIF).

OBJECTIVES

To compare diagnostic outcomes of a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) with a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 251 DIF-positive patients with MMP and 77 DIF-positive patients with PV was undertaken. Parameters analysed included the intraoral sites of involvement and histopathological, DIF and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) findings.

RESULTS

For MMP, PLB was positive in 134 of 143 (93·7%) samples, compared with 129 of 144 (89·6%) by NBPB. The diagnostic sensitivities for PLB (81%, 39 of 48) and NBPB (77%, 37 of 48) among 48 patients who underwent both techniques were not significantly different (P = 0·62). In gingival-only MMP, PLB was positive in 63 of 69 (91%) and NBPB was positive in 63 of 75 (84%). For multisite MMP, PLB was positive in 71 of 74 (96%) and NBPB was positive in 66 of 69 (96%). In gingival-only MMP, biopsies from reflected alveolar mucosa in 17 consecutive patients were positive in 17 of 17 cases (100%). For PV, PLB was positive in 42 of 43 (98%), compared with 42 of 42 (100%) by NBPB. Histopathology was diagnostic in 93 of 134 (69·4%) cases of MMP and 38 of 41 (93%) cases of PV. IIF was positive in 126 of 197 (64·0%) MMP and 68 of 74 (92%) PV patient sera.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest series of combined oral DIF results in patients with MMP and PV, we have shown that NBPB is equivalent to PLB for the diagnosis of PV and multisite MMP, and is more sensitive than both histology and IIF. What's already known about this topic? The variation in sensitivity of oral biopsy sites for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) in the diagnosis of oral MMP and PV has not been studied in detail in large series of patients. Biopsy can be challenging due to difficult access and fragility of the oral mucosa. The diagnostic biopsy technique is therefore critical. What does this study add? We have shown that a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) from uninvolved oral mucosa is as sensitive as a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for diagnosis of oral PV, and superior to serology and histology. For multisite MMP, NBPB is equivalent to PLB and is more sensitive than serology and histology. The oral punch biopsy technique on uninvolved buccal mucosa tissue is a simple and safe practical method for diagnosing oral PV and MMP.

Proteases in Pemphigoid Diseases

Pemphigoid diseases are a subgroup of autoimmune skin diseases characterized by widespread tense blisters. Standard of care typically involves immunosuppressive treatments, which may be insufficient and are often associated with significant adverse events. As such, a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism(s) of pemphigoid diseases is necessary in order to identify improved therapeutic approaches. A major initiator of pemphigoid diseases is the accumulation of autoantibodies against proteins at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ), followed by protease activation at the lesion. The contribution of proteases to pemphigoid disease pathogenesis has been investigated using a combination of in vitro and in vivo models. These studies suggest proteolytic degradation of anchoring proteins proximal to the DEJ is crucial for dermal-epidermal separation and blister formation. In addition, proteases can also augment inflammation, expose autoantigenic cryptic epitopes, and/or provoke autoantigen spreading, which are all important in pemphigoid disease pathology. The present review summarizes and critically evaluates the current understanding with respect to the role of proteases in pemphigoid diseases.

Ocular Manifestations and Management of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases

Autoimmune bullous diseases with ocular involvement consist of a group of systemic entities that are characterized by formation of autoantibodies against the proteins of the epithelial basement membrane zone of the conjunctiva. Mostly, the elderly are affected by these diseases. The characteristic patterns of mucocutaneous involvement and the specific tissue components targeted by these autoantibodies are differentiating features of these diseases. Ocular pemphigus vulgaris exhibits intraepithelial activity, whereas the autoimmune activity in linear immunoglobulin A disease, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita occurs at a subepithelial location. Given the increased risk for blindness with delays in diagnosis and management, early detection of ocular manifestations in these diseases is vital. The precise diagnosis of these autoimmune blistering diseases, which is essential for proper treatment, is based on clinical, histological, and immunological evaluation. Management usually includes anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive medications. Inappropriate treatment results in high morbidity and even potential mortality.

Immunological methods for the diagnosis of oral mucosal diseases

Immunological methods, which have been widely used in autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) of the oral mucosa, can also be adopted as auxiliary diagnostic tools in oral lichen planus (OLP) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). AIBDs, characterized by autoantibodies against structural proteins of keratinocytes or the basement membrane zone, clinically present as blisters and erosions of the oral mucosa. When atypical lesions occur, OLP or DLE may be confused with AIBDs. The improvement of diagnostic accuracy is necessary due to the significant differences in treatment and prognosis among these diseases. A variety of immunological methods are used for qualitative and quantitative detection of target antigens and autoantibodies. These methods can evaluate efficacy of treatment, monitor diseases and guide treatment decisions. In this review, we discuss the application of immunofluorescence, biochemical tests, and protein microarrays for AIBDs, OLP and DLE, as well as the differential diagnostic methods using immunological tests.

Pemphigus and mucous membrane pemphigoid: An update from diagnosis to therapy

Pemphigus diseases (PDs) and mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) are a group of immune-mediated mucocutaneous disorders clinically characterized by the formation of blisters, erosions and ulcers. The skin and mucous membranes are predominantly affected, with the oropharyngeal mucosa as the initially involved site. Ocular involvement is also a frequent feature of these diseases. Because of the considerable overlap in their clinical presentations, the diagnosis of PDs vs. MMP can be challenging. A recognition of their specific immunological and histopathologic features is crucial in the differential diagnosis. Treatment modalities include systemically administered corticosteroids, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and biologic therapies (rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents). Topical, oral, conjunctival, or intralesional corticosteroids as well as anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics are prescribed as needed.

The Diagnosis and Blistering Mechanisms of Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a mucous membrane-dominated autoimmune subepithelial blistering disease that is caused by autoantibodies against various autoantigens in basement membrane zone (BMZ) proteins, including collagen XVII (COL17). Clinicians face diagnostic problems in detecting circulating antibodies and targeted antigens in MMP. The diagnostic difficulties are mainly attributed to the low titers of MMP autoantibodies in sera and to heterogeneous autoantigens. Additionally, no unanimous diagnostic criteria have been drawn for MMP, which can result in delayed diagnoses or misdiagnoses. This review aims to integrate and present currently available data to clarify diagnostic strategies and to present diagnostic criteria for MMP. The ultimate blistering mechanism in MMP has not been elucidated, and such mechanism is especially obscure in COL17-type MMP. In bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, some patients show oral lesion as well as predominant skin lesions. However, there is no fundamental explanation for the onset of oral lesions in BP. This article summarizes innovative research perspectives on the pathogenesis of oral lesions in pemphigoid. Finally, we propose a potential pathogenesis for COL17-type MMP.

Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases

Autoimmune skin blistering diseases (AIBD) are characterized by autoantibodies that are directed against structural proteins in the skin and adjacent mucous membranes. Some clinical signs are typical for a specific AIBD, however, correct diagnosis requires the detection of tissue-bound or circulating autoantibodies. The gold standard for diagnosis of AIBD is the detection of autoantibodies or complement component 3 by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a perilesional biopsy. Circulating antibodies can be detected via indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy of different tissue substrates including human skin, monkey esophagus, and more recently, recombinant forms of the different target antigens. Latter are also employed in various commercial ELISA systems and by immunoblotting in in-house assays available in specialized laboratories. ELISA systems are also particularly valuable for monitoring of the disease activity during the disease course which can be helpful for treatment decisions. Exact diagnosis is essential for both treatment and prognosis, since some AIBD are associated with malign tumors such as paraneoplastic pemphigus and anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid. This review presents clinical and immunopathological features of AIBD for the state-of the art diagnosis of these disorders.

Laryngoceles with airway compromise complicating mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) encompasses a group of autoantibody-mediated, subepithelial blistering diseases, which primarily affect mucosal surfaces including oral, ocular, skin, genital, nasopharyngeal and oesophageal sites. We present a first description of laryngoceles as a manifestation of mucous membrane pemphigoid resulting in dynamic airway closure. Mucosal injury at other sites had previously resulted in pathergy and localised cicatrisation. We discuss successful combined medical and transcutaneous surgical intervention designed to avoid tracheostomy and minimise iatrogenic laryngeal cicatrisation.

A role for auto-immunity in chronic rhinosinusitis? Lessons learned from sub-epidermal bullous disorders of the skin

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a frequent chronic condition, which has origins in complex interactions between genetic, immunological and microbial factors. The role of auto-immunity in CRS remains unclear, although recent studies have started to emerge in CRS patient refractory to maximal medical management. We discuss the possible auto-immunity link between CRS and other skin diseases, in particular acquired bullous dermatoses, and review the current evidence. We raise additional considerations for auto-immunity from both research and clinical standpoints.

Salivary IgA and IgG antibodies to bullous pemphigoid 180 noncollagenous domain 16a as diagnostic biomarkers in mucous membrane pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an uncommon mucocutaneous immunobullous disorder. Use of saliva for diagnosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the noncollagenous (NC) domain 16a of bullous pemphigoid antigen II (BP180) is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether whole or parotid saliva is a suitable alternative to serum for diagnosis of MMP.

METHODS

Precoated BP180-NC16a ELISA plates were used to test serum, and whole and parotid saliva for IgG, IgA and secretory IgA antibodies. Patients with MMP (n = 64) provided matched serum and whole saliva. In addition 18 of the MMP patients also provided matched parotid saliva. Healthy controls (n = 50) provided matched serum and whole saliva and 6 of these additionally provided matched parotid saliva. An additional 16 disease controls provided matched serum, and whole and parotid saliva.

RESULTS

In whole saliva, IgG antibodies were detected in 11/64 (17%), IgA in 23/64 (36%) and a combined positivity in 29/64 (45%). In parotid saliva, IgA antibodies were found in 8/18 (44%). Serum IgG antibodies were detected in 27/64 (42%), serum IgA antibodies in 18/64 (28%) and a combined positivity in 33/64 (52%). Combined use of serum and saliva increased detection of specific antibodies by 30%. Control samples were all negative (positive predictive value of 100% for all tests). The negative predictive values were 62% for IgA saliva, 65% for IgG serum, 59% for IgA serum and 56% for IgG saliva.

CONCLUSIONS

IgG and IgA antibodies may provide a suitable diagnostic marker in MMP. Assay of salivary IgA antibodies to NC16a offers a similar diagnostic predictive value to serum.

Autoimmune bullous diseases with skin and eye involvement: Cicatricial pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and pemphigus paraneoplastica

Autoimmune blistering diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that mostly affect the skin and mucous membranes. Occasionally, other organ systems may be involved, depending on the unique pathophysiology of each disease. Cicatricial pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus are distinct entities, but all have the potential to have cutaneous and ocular involvement. Awareness and early recognition of ocular involvement in these diseases is important given the increased risk for vision loss and blindness with delay in management. Several skin diseases may be associated with involvement of the external eye. The most common autoimmune diseases are cicatricial pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus.

Oral mucosal manifestations of autoimmune skin diseases

A group of autoimmune diseases is characterised by autoantibodies against epithelial adhesion structures and/or tissue-tropic lymphocytes driving inflammatory processes resulting in specific pathology at the mucosal surfaces and the skin. The most frequent site of mucosal involvement in autoimmune diseases is the oral cavity. Broadly, these diseases include conditions affecting the cell-cell adhesion causing intra-epithelial blistering and those where autoantibodies or infiltration lymphocytes cause a loss of cell-matrix adhesion or interface inflammation. Clinically, patients present with blistering, erosions and ulcers that may affect the skin as well as further mucosal surfaces of the eyes, nose and genitalia. While the autoimmune disease may be suspected based on clinical manifestations, demonstration of tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies, or lymphocytic infiltrates, by various methods including histological examination, direct and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, immunoblotting and quantitative immunoassay is a prerequisite for definitive diagnosis. Given the frequency of oral involvement and the fact that oral mucosa is the initially affected site in many cases, the informed practitioner should be well acquainted with diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of autoimmune dermatosis with oral involvement. This paper reviews the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of these conditions in the oral cavity with a specific emphasis on their differential diagnosis and current management approaches.

Unilateral oral mucous membrane pemphigoid: refractory atypical presentation successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulins

A 57-year-old male presented with a 6-month history of blisters and painful erosions on the right buccal mucosa. No skin or other mucosal involvement was seen. The findings of histopathological and direct immunofluorescence examinations were sufficient for the diagnosis of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid in the context of adequate clinical correlation. No response was seen after topical therapies and oral corticosteroids or dapsone. Intravenous immunoglobulin was started and repeated every three weeks. Complete remission was achieved after three cycles and no recurrence was seen after two years of follow-up. The authors report a rare unilateral presentation of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid on the right buccal and hard palate mucosa, without additional involvement during a period of five years. Local trauma or autoimmune factors are possible etiologic factors for this rare disorder, here with unique presentation.

Mucous membranepemphigoid in two half-sisters. The potential roles of autoantibodies to β4 integrin subunits and HLA-DQβ1*0301

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a subepithelial autoimmune mucocutaneous disease. It most frequently affects the oral mucosa, followed by ocular and nasal mucosa, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, skin, laryngeal and esophageal mucosa.

MAIN OBSERVATION

Two half-sisters developed mucous membrane pemphigoid at approximately the same age. The older sister presented with primarily mucosal disease, while the younger had a more cutaneous disease. The histopathology demonstrated a subepithelial blister and direct immunofluorescence showed deposition of IgG and C3 at the basement membrane zone of perilesional tissues in both sisters. Antibodies to human β4 integrin were present in the sera of both patients and correlated with disease activity. Both sisters carried the same HLADQβ1* 0301 allele.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case of mucous membrane pemphigoid occurring in two half-sisters. Perhaps, it is the low incidence of mucous membrane pemphigoid that may account for the lack of reports on familial cases of the disease.

Molecular diagnosis in autoimmune skin blistering conditions

Blister formation in skin and mucous membranes results from a loss of cell-cell or cell-matrix adhesion and is a common outcome of pathological events in a variety of conditions, including autoimmune and genetic diseases, viral and bacterial infections, or injury by physical and chemical factors. Autoantibodies against structural components maintaining cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion induce tissue damage in autoimmune blistering diseases. Detection of these autoantibodies either tissue-bound or circulating in serum is essential to diagnose the autoimmune nature of disease. Various immunofluorescence methods as well as molecular immunoassays, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting, belong to the modern diagnostic algorithms for these disorders. There is still a considerable need to increase awareness of the rare autoimmune blistering diseases, which often show a severe, chronic-relapsing course, among physicians and the public. This review article describes the immunopathological features of autoimmune bullous diseases and the molecular immunoassays currently available for their diagnosis and monitoring.

Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is chronic and frequently associated with exacerbations and remissions of clinical signs and symptoms. Clinicians should use pathologic and immunonologic techniques to help diagnose patients. Multidisciplinary collaboration is often necessary for the diagnosis and proper treatment of MMP. Systemic adjuvant immunosuppressive therapy is necessary for patients with progressive disease. In spite of the advances in available immunosuppressive medications and biologics, scarring is a significant complication in many cases. Surgical intervention is not curable; however, it may be necessary for restoring function and improving quality of life.

Pemphigoid diseases

Pemphigoid diseases are a group of well defined autoimmune disorders that are characterised by autoantibodies against structural proteins of the dermal-epidermal junction and, clinically, by tense blisters and erosions on skin or mucous membranes close to the skin surface. The most common of these diseases is bullous pemphigoid, which mainly affects older people and the reported incidence of which in Europe has more than doubled in the past decade. Prognosis and treatments vary substantially between the different disorders and, since clinical criteria are usually not sufficient, direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional biopsy specimen or serological tests are needed for exact diagnosis. In eight pemphigoid diseases the target antigens have been identified molecularly, which has allowed the development of standard diagnostic assays for detection of serum autoantibodies-some of which are commercially available. In this Seminar we discuss the clinical range, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic assay systems, and treatment options for this group of diseases.

Critical analysis of the use of rituximab in mucous membrane pemphigoid: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disease. In patients who do not respond to conventional therapy, rituximab (RTX) may be an option. The current literature on the treatment of MMP with RTX is limited.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, the data on 28 patients with MMP treated with RTX are critically analyzed. The goal is to provide objective information useful in decision making and treatment.

METHODS

A PubMed search using the key words "rituximab" and "mucous membrane pemphigoid" was made in the English language only. The studies were divided into case reports and case series.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, 20 of 28 patients had a complete response, 3 had a partial response, 2 were nonresponders, and 1 had stabilization of disease. In 1 patient, stabilization of upper airway disease was observed but the patient developed bilateral blindness as a result of progression of disease. Hence, the patient was considered a treatment failure. One died from infection. At least half of the patients were treated with a second cycle because of relapse or lack of response.

LIMITATIONS

Long-term follow-up after RTX therapy is lacking. Hence, the clinical benefit of inducing long-term remissions cannot be assessed. Responses of individual mucosal sites cannot be differentiated. Studies on B-cell levels and antibody responses are lacking.

CONCLUSION

Using the protocol described, RTX benefits patients with recalcitrant MMP. Some patients fail treatment or experience a relapse. The ability of RTX to influence the clinical course of MMP remains to be determined.

The molecular basis for the presence of two autoimmune diseases occurring simultaneously--preliminary observations based on computer analysis

Specific Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II (HLA II) molecules associated with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), mucous membraine pemphigoid (MMP), and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) may react with multiple T cell epitopes within desmoglein 3 (Dsg 3), bullous pemphigoid antigen 2 (BPAG 2), and 70 kDa polypeptide small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNP70) in autoantibody production. We report a group of patients with simultaneous occurrences of PV with MCTD, and MMP with MCTD. In one patient group, we performed serological studies to show presence of antibodies to Dsg 3, Dsg 1, and snRNP70 simultaneously. In the second group, we performed serological studies to show presence of antibodies to BPAG 1, BPAG 2, β4 integrin, and snRNP70 simultaneously. In both groups, HLA II genes were analyzed and the observations were consistent with previously described associations with PV, MMP, and MCTD. It is possible that HLA-DQβ1*0301 allele, present in 10 of 17 patients and DRβ1*04 in some of the others, may have the ability to bind to several relevant T cell epitopes in the snRNP70 molecule. We have utilized a computer model to demonstrate that HLA II-restricted T cell epitopes present within the known autoantigens may be capable of eliciting an immune response. While other explanations and mechanisms exist, the authors suggest that epitope spreading may be one possible mechanism, amongst others, that may result in the simultaneous presence of two separate pathogenic autoantibodies.

Treatment strategies in mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune blistering disorder that is characterized by subepithelial bullae. Various basement membrane zone components have been identified as targets of autoantibodies in MMP. Considerable variability exists in the clinical presentation of MMP. Mucous membranes that may be involved include the oral cavity, conjunctiva, nasopharynx, larynx, esophagus, genitourinary tract, and anus. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in the management of MMP. Early recognition of this disorder and treatment may decrease disease-related complications. The choice of agents for treatment of MMP is based upon the sites of involvement, clinical severity, and disease progression. For more severe disease, or with rapid progression, systemic corticosteroids are the agents of choice for initial treatment, combined with steroid-sparing agents for long-term maintenance. Due to the rarity of this disease, large controlled studies comparing the efficacy of various agents are lacking.