Rituximab treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Obinutuzumab and Ofatumumab are More Effective Than Rituximab in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy Patients With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies

Introduction

Although rituximab has significantly improved outcomes for patients with membranous nephropathy, response to treatment is not universal and drug resistance can occur. One mechanism of resistance is the occurrence of antidrug antibodies. Obinutuzumab and ofatumumab are humanized and human monoclonal antibodies, respectively, that target B cells. These treatments have been shown to be effective in membranous nephropathy. However, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab have never been compared with rituximab in the treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy with anti-rituximab antibodies. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab with rituximab in patients with membranous nephropathy with anti-rituximab antibodies.

Methods

This international retrospective multicenter study enrolled 34 patients with membranous nephropathy from 5 nephrology departments in France, India, and Italy. All the patients had previously developed anti-rituximab antibodies. Nineteen patients received rituximab, 12 received obinutuzumab, and 3 received ofatumumab.

Results

Patients treated with obinutuzumab or ofatumumab were more likely to achieve clinical remission than those treated with rituximab at month 6 (87% vs. 37%, P = 0.005) and month 12 (87% vs. 42%, P = 0.01). Patients treated with obinutuzumab or ofatumumab were more likely to achieve immunological remission and B-cell depletion at month 6 than the patients treated with rituximab (92% vs. 56%, P = 0.04 and 93% vs. 35%, P = 0.002, respectively). No serious adverse events were reported in the obinutuzumab or ofatumumab group.

Conclusion

Obinutuzumab and ofatumumab are more effective than rituximab in treating patients with membranous nephropathy with anti-rituximab antibodies. Anti-rituximab antibodies should be systematically monitored, to determine appropriate treatment.

Overview of Immunological Response in Urological Membranous Nephropathy: Focus on Cytokine and Treatment Options

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease that is caused by the production of autoantibody against glomerular podocyte antigens by immune cells due to the lack of self-tolerance mechanisms. Similar to many autoimmune diseases, the pathogenesis of MN is still vague and many experiments are being conducted to detect the antigens and genetic reasons for MN illness. Recently, new antigens, such as exotosin 1/exotosin 2, neural EGF-like-1, semaphorin 3B, and protocadherin 7 have been identified in MN patients who did not have presence of antiphospholipase A2 receptor antigen. What is more, cytokines, which are molecules that regulate immune responses, have been found to have harmful effects in various autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and MN. The role of cytokines and treatment strategies in MN patients is discussed in this article. As the understanding of the disease improves, targeted therapies that focus on specific antigens or cytokines may be developed to effectively manage MN.

Different Dosage Regimens of Rituximab in Primary Membranous Nephropathy Treatment: A Systematic Review

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is one of the prevalent pathological types of adult primary nephrotic syndrome. Pathogenic autoantibodies targeting podocyte antigens such as phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) lead to the disease. Patients frequently experience notable adverse effects when treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Rituximab (RTX), a mouse/human monoclonal antibody, selectively depletes B cells and leads to a decrease in the antibody levels in the circulation, which helps to alleviate membranous nephropathy. Various RTX dosage regimens have been applied globally in the PMN treatment with satisfactory effects. Nevertheless, the optimal dosage of RTX has yet to be determined. This article reviews the application of different doses of RTX in the management of PMN so far.

B cell dysregulation and depletion therapy in primary membranous nephropathy: Prospects and potential challenges

B cells are crucial to the humoral immune response, originating in the bone marrow and maturing in the spleen and lymph nodes. They primarily function to protect against a wide range of infections through the secretion of antibodies. The role of B cells in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) has gained significant attention, especially following the discovery of various autoantibodies that target podocyte antigens and the observed positive outcomes from B cell depletion therapy. Increasing evidence points to the presence of abnormal B cell subsets and functions in MN. B cells have varied roles during the different stages of disease onset, progression, and relapse. Initially, B cells facilitate self-antigen presentation, activate effector T cells, and initiate cellular immunity. Subsequently, the disruption of both central and peripheral immune tolerance results in the emergence of autoreactive B cells, with strong germinal center responses as a major source of MN autoantibodies. Additionally, critical B cell subsets, including Bregs, memory B cells, and plasma cells, play roles in the immune dysregulation observed in MN, assisting in predicting disease recurrence and guiding management strategies for MN. This review offers a detailed overview of research advancements on B cells and elucidates their pathological roles in MN.

Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on renal prognosis in primary membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive therapy plays a crucial role in treating membranous nephropathy, with previous studies highlighting its benefits for patients with primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). Guidelines suggest that the management of membranous nephropathy should be tailored to individual risk levels. However, there is a lack of real-world studies examining the effects of immunosuppressive therapy on renal outcomes in PMN patients. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between immunosuppressive therapy and renal prognosis in PMN patients.

METHODS

This was a real-world retrospective study including patients diagnosed with PMN in Shenzhen Second People's Hospital and Hechi People's Hospital. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

After propensity score-matching, 464 PMN patients were included and they were assigned to conservative and immunosuppressive group in a 1:1 ratio. Immunosuppressive therapy was the protective factor of renal composite outcome (HR = 0.65, p < 0.01). Separately, the effect was significant in moderate- and high-risk but not in low-risk patients. Key influencing factors including age, blood pressure, albumin and total cholesterol levels, with slight differences among patients at different risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in non-low-risk PMN patients. The key factors affecting renal prognosis in patients with different risk levels are emphasized to help provide individualized treatment.

Follicular Helper T Cells and Follicular Regulatory T Cells Involved in Immune Disorders of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of follicular helper T (Tfh) cells and follicular regulatory T (Tfr) cells in immune disorders of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples of 41 IMN patients and 30 healthy controls were collected. The percentages of B cells, Tfh cells and Tfr cells were determined by flow cytometry, and the concentrations of IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-21 were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Furthermore, sorted Tfh cells or Tfr cells were co-cultured with B cells in vitro to detect the cell function.

RESULTS

B cells, Tfh cells, Tfr cells, Tfr / Tfh ratio, IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-21 were significantly higher in IMN patients compared to controls. IMN patients had reduced percentages of CTLA-4+Tfr cells, increased percentages of PD-1+Tfr cells, and reduced CTLA-4+Tfr / PD-1+Tfr. In the co-culture system, IgG4, lactic acid, IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-21 were higher in Tfh cells derived from IMN patients, while IgG4, lactic acid, IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-21 were lower in Tfr cells derived from healthy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Tfh cells and Tfr cells are involved in immune disorders in IMN. This may be associated with abnormal expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1.

Membranous Nephropathy: Updates on Management

Membranous nephropathy is a major etiology of nephrotic syndrome in adults and less frequently in children. Circulating antibodies to intrinsic podocyte antigens, such as M-type phospholipase A2 receptor, or to extrinsic proteins accumulate beneath the podocyte to cause damage via complement activation and/or other mechanisms. The availability of clinical testing for autoantibodies to M-type phospholipase A2 receptor has allowed noninvasive diagnosis of this form of membranous nephropathy and a means to monitor immunologic activity to guide immunosuppressive therapy. Treatment of membranous nephropathy includes optimal supportive care with renin-angiotensin-system blockers, lipid-lowering agents, diuretics, lifestyle changes, and additional immunosuppressive therapy in patients with an increased risk of progression to kidney failure. Rituximab has been recognized as a first-line immunosuppressive therapy for most membranous nephropathy patients with an increased risk of progressive disease, except those with life-threatening nephrotic syndrome or rapidly deteriorating kidney function from membranous nephropathy. This article discusses the major and minor antigens described in membranous nephropathy, the natural history of the disease, and guidelines for clinical management and immunosuppressive treatment.

Membranous nephropathy-diagnosis and identification of target antigens

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. MN is characterized by subepithelial accumulation of immune complexes along the glomerular basement membrane. The immune complexes are composed of immunoglobulin G and a target antigen. PLA2R is the target antigen in approximately 60% of MN cases, and MN is traditionally classified as PLA2R-positive or PLA2R-negative MN. Over the last 7 years, additional target antigens have been identified, which have specific disease associations, distinctive clinical and pathologic findings, and therapeutic implications. The newly discovered target antigens include NELL1, EXT1/EXT2, NCAM1, SEMA3B, PCDH7, FAT1, CNTN1, NTNG1, PCSK6 and NDNF. To group all these antigens into a generic 'PLA2R-negative' MN group is imprecise and un-informative. We propose a logical approach for detection of the target antigen which includes (i) currently available serology-based testing to detect anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A antibodies; and (ii) kidney biopsy testing to detect the target antigens. Determination of the antigen on kidney biopsy can be done by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence studies. Alternatively, laser capture microdissection (LCM) of glomeruli followed by mass spectrometry (MS) can be used to identify a target antigen. LCM/MS has the advantage of being a one-stop test and is particularly useful for detection of rare target antigens. At the current time, while it is possible to detect the newer antigens by immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence/LCM/MS, serology-based tests to detect serum antibodies to the new antigens are not yet available. It is critical that serology-based tests should be developed not just for accurate diagnosis, but as a guide for treatment. We review the current methodology and propose an algorithm for diagnosis and detection of target antigens in MN that may shape the current practice in the future. Membranous nephropathy (MN) results from accumulation of subepithelial immune complexes along the glomerular basement membrane.PLA2R is the most common target antigen, but newly discovered target antigens have filled the void of PLA2R-negative MN.MN associated with the newly discovered target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic findings, treatment and prognostic implications. These include NELL1, EXT1/EXT2, NCAM1, PCDH7, SEMA3B, CNTN1, FAT1, NDNF and PCSK6.Immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence methodology is currently in use for detecting target antigens in kidney biopsy tissue, although we anticipate laser capture microdissection of glomeruli followed by mass spectrometry will become available soon.Serologic testing is currently available for only detecting antibodies to PLA2R and THSD7A. It is critical that serologic tests become available for detecting antibodies to the newly discovered antigens.

Membranous nephropathy treatment standard

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is characterized by deposition of immune complexes leading to thickening of glomerular basement membranes. Over time, the understanding of MN has evolved, with the identification of specific autoantibodies against novel podocyte antigens and the unraveling of intricate pathogenic pathways. Although the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is favored as part of the initial therapy in MN, a subgroup of MN patients may be resistant to rituximab necessitating the use of alternative agents such as cytotoxic therapies. In addition, newer agents such as novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, therapies targeting the CD38-positive plasma cells and anti-complement therapy are being studied in patients who are resistant to traditional treatment strategies. This manuscript furnishes a review of the novel developments in the pathophysiology of MN including the identification of target antigens and current treatment standards for MN, concentrating on evidenced-based interventions designed to attain remission and to prevent disease progression.

Optimization of Rituximab Therapy in Adult Patients With PLA2R1-Associated Membranous Nephropathy With Artificial Intelligence

Introduction

Rituximab is a first-line treatment for membranous nephropathy. Nephrotic syndrome limits rituximab exposure due to urinary drug loss. Rituximab underdosing (serum level <2 μg/ml at month-3) is a risk factor for treatment failure. We developed a machine learning algorithm to predict the risk of underdosing based on patients' characteristics at rituximab infusion. We investigated the relationship between the predicted risk of underdosing and the cumulative dose of rituximab required to achieve remission.

Methods

Rituximab concentrations were measured at month-3 in 92 sera from adult patients with primary membranous nephropathy, split into a training (75%) and a testing set (25%). A forward-backward machine-learning procedure determined the best combination of variables to predict rituximab underdosing in the training data set, which was tested in the test set. The performances were evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in 10-fold cross-validation training and test sets.

Results

The best variables combination to predict rituximab underdosing included age, gender, body surface area (BSA), anti-phospholipase A2 receptor type 1 (anti-PLA2R1) antibody titer on day-0, serum albumin on day-0 and day-15, and serum creatinine on day-0 and day-15. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were respectively 79.4%, 78.7%, and 81.0% (training data set), and 79.2%, 84.6% and 72.7% (testing data set). In both sets, the algorithm performed significantly better than chance (P < 0.05). Patients with an initial high probability of underdosing experienced a longer time to remission with higher rituximab cumulative doses required to achieved remission.

Conclusion

This algorithm could allow for early intensification of rituximab regimen in patients at high estimated risk of underdosing to increase the likelihood of remission.

Anti-PLA2R Antibody Levels and Clinical Risk Factors for Treatment Nonresponse in Membranous Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The 2021 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend following anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody levels as a marker of treatment response in membranous nephropathy; however, the optimal timing to evaluate antibody levels and how to combine them with other clinical variables are currently unknown.

METHODS

We used a cohort of 85 patients from the Membranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab (MENTOR) with anti-PLA2R antibodies ≥14 RU/ml to identify risk factors for not experiencing proteinuria remission after 12 months of treatment with cyclosporine or rituximab. Three landmark times were considered: at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Logistic regression model performance was evaluated using C-statistics and model fit (Akaike information criterion [AIC], R 2 ).

RESULTS

The model at baseline that best predicted no remission included anti-PLA2R antibodies >323 RU/ml and creatinine clearance; the best model after 3 months included the change from baseline in both antibody and albumin levels; and the best model after 6 months included antibody levels >14 RU/ml, creatinine clearance, and the change from baseline in albumin. Compared with the model at baseline, the model at 3 months had better model fit (AIC 70.9 versus 96.4, R 2 51.8% versus 30.1%) and higher C-statistic (0.93 versus 0.83, P = 0.008). The model at 6 months had no difference in performance compared with the model at 3 months (AIC 68.6, R 2 53.0%, C-statistic 0.94, P = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with membranous nephropathy treated with cyclosporine or rituximab in the MENTOR trial, we found that the optimal method to evaluate risk factors for the probability of treatment response was to use anti-PLA2R antibody levels combined with albumin levels after 3 months of treatment, which was significantly better than using antibody levels alone or risk factor evaluation at baseline, with no added benefit of waiting until 6 months of treatment.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_10_09_CJN0000000000000237.mp3.

Anti-CD20 should be the first-line treatment in high-risk membranous nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults and if untreated can progress to endstage kidney disease. Factors considered to place a patient at high or very high risk for progression include elevated serum creatinine at baseline, declining kidney function, persistent heavy proteinuria (>8 g/24 h), or persistent NS, presence of life-threatening complications related to NS (such as venous thromboembolic events), or very high anti-PLA2R antibody titers (>150 RU/ml). Patients who are at high or very high risk of progression should be treated with immunosuppression therapy to induce remission of proteinuria and to avoid progressive loss of kidney function. Traditional forms of immunosuppression for patients with MN have included the use of cyclic courses of corticosteroids with cyclophosphamide or calcineurin inhibitors. These forms of therapy are associated with significant toxicity, e.g. corticosteroids (infections, diabetes, weight gain), cyclophosphamide (infertility, severe leukopenia, malignancy), and calcineurin inhibitors (hypertension, nephrotoxicity). The introduction of anti-CD20+ B-cell therapies in the late 1990s has changed the landscape. In this article we will argue that anti-CD20+ B therapy should be the treatment of choice for patients at high/very high risk of progression when considering its efficacy and side-effect profile.

Present and Future of IgA Nephropathy and Membranous Nephropathy Immune Monitoring: Insights from Molecular Studies

IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) and Membranous Nephropathy (MN) are primary immune-mediated glomerular diseases with highly variable prognosis. Current guidelines recommend that greater immunologic activity and worse prognosis should guide towards the best treatment in an individualized approach. Nevertheless, proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate, the current gold standards for prognosis assessment and treatment guidance in primary glomerular diseases, may be altered with chronic damage and nephron scarring, conditions that are not related to immune activity. In recent years, thanks to the development of new molecular technologies, among them genome-wide genotyping, RNA sequencing techniques, and mass spectrometry, we have witnessed an outstanding improvement in understanding the pathogenesis of IgAN and MN. In addition, recent genome-wide association studies have suggested potential targets for immunomodulating agents, stressing the need for the identification of specific biomarkers of immune activity. In this work, we aim to review current evidence and recent progress, including the more recent use of omics techniques, in the identification of potential biomarkers for immune monitoring in IgAN and MN.

Update on the Application of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Primary Membranous Nephropathy

When first introduced, rituximab (RTX), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, brought about an alternative therapeutic paradigm for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). Rituximab was shown to be effective and safe in PMN patients with kidney dysfunction, with. patients receiving second-line rituximab therapy achieving remission as effectively as those patients who had not previously received immunotherapy. No safety issues were reported. The B cell-driven protocol seems to be as efficient as the 375 mg/m² × 4 regimen or 1 g × 2 regimen in achieving B cell depletion and remission, but patients with high M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody levels may benefit from a higher dose of rituximab. While rituximab added another therapeutic option to the treatment regimen, it does have limitations as 20 to 40% of patients do not respond. Not all patients respond to RTX therapy for lymphoproliferative disorders either, therefore further novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been developed and these may provide alternative therapeutic options for PMN. Ofatumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, specifically recognizes an epitope encompassing both the small and large extracellular loops of the CD20 molecule, resulting in increased complement-dependent cytotoxic activity. Ocrelizumab binds an alternative but overlapping epitope region to rituximab and displays enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxic (ADCC) activities. Obinutuzumab is designed to have a modified elbow-hinge amino acid sequence, leading to increased direct cell death induction and ADCC activities. In PMN clinical studies, ocrelizumab and obinutuzumab showed promising results, while ofatumumab displayed mixed results. However, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials with large samples, especially direct head-to-head comparisons. Alternative molecular mechanisms have been suggested in this context to explore novel therapeutic strategies. B cell activator-targeted, plasma cell-targeted and complement-directed treatments may lead to novel therapy paradigms for PMN. Exploratory strategies for the use of drugs with different mechanisms, such as a combination of rituximab and cyclophosphamide and a steroid, a combination of rituximab and a calcineurin inhibitor, may provide more rapid and efficient remission, but the combination of standard immunosuppression with rituximab could increase infection risk.

Association Between High NK-Cell Count and Remission of Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Retrospective Chart Review and Pilot Study

PURPOSE

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Rituximab monotherapy has emerged as a front-line treatment for patients with PMN, but potential markers for predicting the response to rituximab are unknown.

METHODS

In this single-arm retrospective pilot study, 48 patients with PMN without previous immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled. All patients were treated with rituximab and were followed up for at least 6 months. The primary end point was the achievement of complete or partial remission at 6 months. The subsets of lymphocytes were collected at baseline, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months to identify prognostic factors for achieving remission of PMN with rituximab therapy.

FINDINGS

A total of 58.3% of patients (28/48) achieved remission. Lower serum creatinine, greater serum albumin, and greater phospholipase A2 receptor antigen detected in kidney biopsy at baseline were found in the remission group. After multiple adjustments, a high percentage of natural killer (NK) cells at baseline, especially ≥15.7%, was strongly associated with remission (relative risk = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.00-2.62; P = 0.049), and patients with a response to rituximab had a greater mean percentage of NK cells during the follow-up period compared with nonresponders. Analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve indicated prognostic value of the NK-cell percentage at baseline, with an area under the curve of 0.716 (95% CI, 0.556-0.876; P = 0.021).

IMPLICATIONS

The findings from this retrospective pilot study suggest that a high percentage, especially ≥15.7%, of NK cells at baseline might predict a response to rituximab treatment. These findings provide a basis for designing larger-scale studies to test the predictive value of NK cells in patients with PMN undergoing rituximab treatment.

Treatment of membranous nephropathy: Perspectives on current and future therapies

Primary membranous nephropathy remains one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. It is an autoimmune disorder in which auto-antibodies target antigens at the podocytes cell membrane-basement membrane interface. Our understanding of membranous nephropathy has expanded dramatically as of late. After the initial discovery of the phospholipase A2 receptor auto-antibody in 2009, eight more antigens have been discovered. These discoveries have led to refinement in our understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and natural history of primary membranous nephropathy. Now, many experts advocate for redefining primary membranous nephropathy based on antigen, potentially shedding the primary and secondary nomenclature. Recently, therapies for primary membranous have also expanded. Immunosuppressive therapies like cyclophosphamide and rituximab, which primarily target B-cells, remain the cornerstone of therapy. However, there is still significant room for improvement, as many as 30-40% do not respond to this therapy according to recent trials. Additionally, drugs targeting complement, and other novel therapies are also under investigation. In this review we will discuss the available therapies for primary membranous nephropathy in light of recent clinic trials like GEMRITUX, MENTOR, RI-CYCLO, and STARMEN, as well as management strategies. While the last 10 years have seen a boom in our mechanistic understanding of this ever-diversifying disease, we are likely to see a similar boom in the therapeutic options in the years to come.

Successful treatment of patients with refractory idiopathic membranous nephropathy with low-dose Rituximab: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The recognition of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) as an autoimmune disease has paved the way for the use of B-cell-depleting agents, such as Rituximab (RTX), which is now a first-line drug for treating IMN with proven safety and efficacy. Nevertheless, the usage of RTX for the treatment of refractory IMN remains controversial and challenging.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new low-dose RTX regimen for the treatment of patients with refractory IMN.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on refractory IMN patients that accepted a low-dose RTX regimen (RTX, 200 mg, once a month for five months) in the Xiyuan Hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences’ Department of Nephrology from October 2019 to December 2021. To assess the clinical and immune remission data, we performed a 24 h urinary protein quantification (UTP) test and measured the serum albumin (ALB) and serum creatinine (SCr) levels, phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody titer, and CD19⁺ B-cell count every three months.

RESULTS

A total of nine refractory IMN patients were analyzed. During follow-up conducted twelve months later, the results from the 24 h UTP decreased from baseline [8.14 ± 6.05 g/d to 1.24 ± 1.34 g/d (P < 0.05)] and the ALB levels increased from baseline [28.06 ± 8.42 g/L to 40.93 ± 5.85 g/L (P < 0.01)]. Notably, after administering RTX for six months, the SCr decreased from 78.13 ± 16.49 μmol/L to 109.67 ± 40.87 μmol/L (P < 0.05). All of the nine patients were positive for serum anti-PLA2R at the beginning, and four patients had normal anti-PLA2R titer levels at six months. The level of CD19⁺ B-cells decreased to 0 at three months, and CD19⁺ B-cell count remained at 0 up until six months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our low-dose RTX regimen appears to be a promising treatment strategy for refractory IMN.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab for primary membranous nephropathy with different clinical presentations: a retrospective study

Background

Rituximab (RTX) is gaining increasing clinical acceptance in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN), with demonstrated efficacy and safety. However, there are few clinical studies on RTX for PMN in Asian populations, especially in China.

Methods

To observe and analyse the efficacy and safety of RTX treatment, 81 patients with PMN suffering from nephrotic syndrome (NS) were enrolled and divided into an initial therapy group, a conventional immunosuppressive therapy relapse group, and a conventional immunosuppressive therapy ineffective group according to their pre-RTX treatment background. Patients in each group were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 12 months, and the secondary outcomes were safety and the occurrence of adverse events.

Results

At 12 months, 65 of 81 (80.2%) patients achieved complete (n=21, 25.9%) or partial (n=44, 54.3%) remission after rituximab treatment. Thirty-two of 36 (88.9%) patients in the initial therapy group, 11 of 12 (91.7%) patients in the relapse group and 22 of 33 (66.7%) patients in the ineffective group achieved clinical remission. All 59 patients with positive anti-PLA2R antibodies showed a decreasing trend in antibody levels after RTX treatment, and 55 (93.2%) of them achieved antibody clearance (<20 U/mL). Logistic regression analysis showed that a high anti-PLA2R antibody titer (OR=0.993, P=0.032) was an independent risk factor for nonremission. Adverse events occurred in 18 (22.2%) patients, of which 5 (6.2%) were serious adverse events, and none were malignant or otherwise fatal.

Conclusion

RTX alone can effectively induce remission PMN and maintain stable renal function. It is recommended as the first choice of treatment and is also effective in patients who relapse and have poor responses to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Anti-PLA2R antibodies can be used as a marker for RTX treatment monitoring, and antibody clearance is necessary to achieve and improve the rates of clinical remission.

Implications of rituximab pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in various immune-mediated glomerulopathies and potential anti-CD20 therapy alternatives

The specific B-cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) is effective in terms of the treatment of various immune-mediated glomerulopathies. The administration of RTX has been shown to be reliable and highly effective particularly in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, which is manifested predominantly with non-nephrotic proteinuria. Stable long-term B-cell depletion is usually readily attained in such patients using standard dosing regimens. However, in patients with nephrotic syndrome and non-selective proteinuria, the RTX pharmacokinetics is altered profoundly and RTX does not maintain high enough levels for a sufficiently long period, which may render RTX treatment ineffective. Since complement-derived cytotoxicity is one of the important modes of action of RTX, hypocomplementemia, frequently associated with systemic lupus erythematodes, may act to hamper the efficacy of RTX in the treatment of patients with lupus nephritis. This review provides a description of RTX pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in several selected glomerulopathies, as well as the impact of proteinuria, anti-drug antibodies and other clinical variables on the clearance and volume of distribution of RTX. The impact of plasmapheresis and peritoneal dialysis on the clearance of RTX is also discussed in the paper. A review is provided of the potential association between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in various kidney-affecting glomerular diseases, the sustainability of B-cell depletion and the clinical efficacy of RTX, with proposals for potential dosing implications. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment tailoring is also discussed, and various previously tested RTX dosing schedules are compared in terms of their clinical and laboratory treatment responses. Since alternative anti-CD20 molecules may prove effective in RTX unresponsive patients, their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and current role in the treatment of glomerulopathies are also mentioned.

Rituximab Dosing in Glomerular Diseases: A Scoping Review

Purpose of Review

Rituximab is increasingly prescribed for glomerular diseases. However, the recently published Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases lacks details on recommended dosing regimens for most individual glomerular diseases. We performed this scoping review summarizing the evidence for rituximab dosing in glomerular disease.

Sources of Information

PubMed database.

Methods

The PubMed search methodology was developed with a medical librarian and performed by the first, with review by a second, author. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) examining rituximab efficacy and/or safety in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), membranous nephropathy (MN), lupus nephritis (LN), or podocytopathies (minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [FSGS]) were included. Fifty-three studies (14 RCTs and 39 PCSs) were included.

Key Findings

We identified 16 different rituximab dosing regimens studied as induction therapy for one or more of the 5 glomerular diseases of interest. The most frequently studied rituximab induction regimens were 1000 mg as 2 doses 2 weeks apart (17 studies, 32%) and 4 doses of 375 mg/m2/week (18 studies, 33.9%). Twenty-six studies (49%) examined rituximab as monotherapy or in conjunction with corticosteroids alone, while the remaining studies examined rituximab as part of combination immunosuppression. Adapting treatment to achieve B-cell depletion, with frequent evaluation of disease-specific biomarkers, might prove the optimal approach to achieving and maintaining remission. Rituximab might also enable steroid minimization or avoidance.

Limitations

Restriction of the search to a single database and to studies published in the English language, and with an accompanying abstract, could have led to selection bias. While the search was limited to prospective observational studies and RCTs, no formal assessment of study quality was performed.

Efficacy of long-term repeated rituximab treatment in refractory phospholipase A2 receptor-antibody-related membranous nephropathy

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of long-term repeated rituximab treatment in refractory PLA2R-Ab-related membranous nephropathy (MN). Materials & methods: Rituximab was administered at a single dose of 375 mg/m² and repeated if peripheral B-cell levels were >5/ul in 46 patients with refractory PLA2R-Ab-related MN. Results: The median frequency of rituximab treatment was 3 (IQR 2.0-4.0). A total of 32 (32/46) patients achieved remission (completed remission [CR] or partial remission [PR]) over a median time of 17.0 months, and 10 patients eventually progressed to CR. The proportion of serum PLA2R-Ab depletion was 73.91% (34/46) over a median time of 9 months. Antibody depletion preceded proteinuria remission. Conclusions: Long-term repeated rituximab treatment achieved high kidney and immunological response rates in refractory PLA2R-Ab related MN, and antibody depletion was a prerequisite for proteinuria remission.

Advances in the Management of Primary Membranous Nephropathy and Rituximab-Refractory Membranous Nephropathy

Primary membranous nephropathy (pMN) is an auto-immune disease characterized by auto-antibodies targeting podocyte antigens resulting in activation of complement and damage to the glomerular basement membrane. pMN is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults without diabetes. Despite a very heterogeneous course of the disease, the treatment of pMN has for many years been based on uniform management of all patients regardless of the severity of the disease. The identification of prognostic markers has radically changed the vision of pMN and allowed KDIGO guidelines to evolve in 2021 towards a more personalized management based on the assessment of the risk of progressive loss of kidney function. The recognition of pMN as an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease has rationalized the use immunosuppressive drugs such as rituximab. Rituximab is now a first line immunosuppressive therapy for patients with pMN with proven safety and efficacy achieving remission in 60-80% of patients. For the remaining 20-40% of patients, several mechanisms may explain rituximab resistance: (i) decreased rituximab bioavailability; (ii) immunization against rituximab; and (iii) chronic glomerular damage. The treatment of patients with rituximab-refractory pMN remains controversial and challenging. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances in the management of pMN (according to the KDIGO 2021 guidelines), in the understanding of the pathophysiology of rituximab resistance, and in the management of rituximab-refractory pMN. We propose a treatment decision aid based on immunomonitoring to identify failures related to underdosing or immunization against rituximab to overcome treatment resistance.

The Role of Anti-PLA2R and Anti-THSD7A Antibodies in the Pathogenesis and Diagnostics of Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Review of Current Knowledge for Clinical Practice

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is considered a major cause of nephrotic syndrome. The discovery of circulating autoantibodies directed against glomerular podocytes helped to classify them as autoimmune diseases. Over the past years, there has been an increasing significance of anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor (anti-PLA₂R), which has been detected in 70–80% of PMN cases, and relevance of anti-Thrombospondin type I domain-containing 7A (anti-THSD7A) even though they are present in 2–5% of patients. The results of clinical and experimental studies indicate that these antibodies are pathogenic. It radically changed the diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Measurement of antibody titers in the serum seems to be a valuable tool for identifying PMN and for the assessment of disease activity. By monitoring pathogenic antibodies levels rather than proteinuria or reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as an indicator of glomerular disease, physicians would easier divide patients into those with active and inactive PMN disease and decide about their therapy. The aim of this review is to evaluate scientific evidence about the role of autoantibodies, namely anti-PLA₂R and anti-THSD7A, as PMN biomarkers. The present manuscript focuses on PMN pathogenesis and key data of diagnosis, monitoring of the disease, and treatment strategies that are currently being used in clinical practice.

Evaluation of efficacy of rituximab for membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies

INTRODUCTION

The use of traditional immunosuppressive medicines for the treatment of membranous nephropathy is being challenged, owing to its limited efficacy and tolerability. Research on M-type phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies has provided a new way for evaluating the efficiency and prognosis of treatment of membranous nephropathy. However, the relationship between rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, and antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies and the drug regimen of rituximab for membranous nephropathy is uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab treatments in membranous nephropathy and compared the clinical effects of first-line and second-line rituximab therapies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register ofControlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to find articles about rituximab treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy between January 2000 and August 2020. The outcomes included remission, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies, relapse, and adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the strength of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 723 participants from 11 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The other treatments included cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, steroids, and non-immunosuppressive antiproteinuric treatment. Rituximab significantly improved cumulative remission (P=0.007; Odds Ratio [OR]=3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.35-6.94) compared with other treatments. It significantly reduced relapse (P<0.00001; OR=0.06; 95% CI=0.02-0.19), antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels (P=0.0009; SMD=-0.52; 95% CI=-0.83 to -0.21), and the proportion of patients positive for anti-PLA2R antibodies (P=0.003; OR=6.11; 95% CI=1.85-20.24) compared with other treatments. Compared with the second-line, first-line rituximab therapy achieved a higher rate of cumulative remission (P=0.03; OR=0.32, 95% CI=0.11-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab can improve the rate of clinical remission in patients with membranous nephropathy. Rituximab was more effective than other treatments in reducing relapse, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels, and the proportion of patients positive for antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies. The clinical remission rate following first-line rituximab therapy was better than that of second-line rituximab therapy for membranous nephropathy.

New Insights into the Treatment of Glomerular Diseases: When Mechanisms Become Vivid

Treatment for glomerular diseases has been extrapolated from the experience of other autoimmune disorders while the underlying pathogenic mechanisms were still not well understood. As the classification of glomerular diseases was based on patterns of juries instead of mechanisms, treatments were typically the art of try and error. With the advancement of molecular biology, the role of the immune agent in glomerular diseases is becoming more evident. The four-hit theory based on the discovery of gd-IgA1 gives a more transparent outline of the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), and dysregulation of Treg plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of minimal change disease (MCD). An epoch-making breakthrough is the discovery of PLA2R antibodies in the primary membranous nephropathy (pMN). This is the first biomarker applied for precision medicine in kidney disease. Understanding the immune system's role in glomerular diseases allows the use of various immunosuppressants or other novel treatments, such as complement inhibitors, to treat glomerular diseases more reasonable. In this era of advocating personalized medicine, it is inevitable to develop precision medicine with mechanism-based novel biomarkers and novel therapies in kidney disease.

B Cells in Primary Membranous Nephropathy: Escape from Immune Tolerance and Implications for Patient Management

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an important cause of nephrotic syndrome and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in adults. The pathogenic significance of B cells in MN is increasingly recognized, especially following the discovery of various autoantibodies that target specific podocytic antigens and the promising treatment responses seen with B cell depleting therapies. The presence of autoreactive B cells and autoantibodies that bind to antigens on podocyte surfaces are characteristic features of MN, and are the result of breaches in central and peripheral tolerance of B lymphocytes. These perturbations in B cell tolerance include altered B lymphocyte subsets, dysregulation of genes that govern immunoglobulin production, aberrant somatic hypermutation and co-stimulatory signalling, abnormal expression of B cell-related cytokines, and increased B cell infiltrates and organized tertiary lymphoid structures within the kidneys. An understanding of the role of B cell tolerance and homeostasis may have important implications for patient management in MN, as conventional immunosuppressive treatments and novel B cell-targeted therapies show distinct effects on proliferation, differentiation and reconstitution in different B cell subsets. Circulating B lymphocytes and related cytokines may serve as potential biomarkers for treatment selection, monitoring of therapeutic response and prediction of disease relapse. These recent advances in the understanding of B cell tolerance in MN have provided greater insight into its immunopathogenesis and potential novel strategies for disease monitoring and treatment.

Noninvasive Diagnosis of PLA2R-Associated Membranous Nephropathy: A Validation Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney biopsy is the current gold standard to diagnose membranous nephropathy. Approximately 70%-80% of patients with primary membranous nephropathy have circulating anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies. We previously demonstrated that in proteinuric patients with preserved eGFR and absence of associated conditions (e.g., autoimmunity, malignancy, infection, drugs, and paraproteinemia), a positive anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody test by ELISA and immunofluorescence assay confirms the diagnosis of membranous nephropathy noninvasively. These data have not been externally validated.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with a positive anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody test at the Mayo Clinic, the University Hospital Vall D'Hebron (Barcelona), and the Columbia University Medical Center (New York) were retrospectively reviewed. Biopsy findings and presence or absence of a potential associated condition were assessed.

RESULTS

From a total of 276 patients with positive anti-phospholipase A2 receptor serology, previously reported patients (n=33), kidney transplant recipients (n=9), pediatric patients (n=2), and patients without kidney biopsy (n=69) were excluded. Among the 163 remaining patients, associated conditions were identified in 47 patients, and 15 patients had diabetes mellitus. All 101 patients of the final cohort had a primary diagnosis of membranous nephropathy on kidney biopsy. In the 79 patients with eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, none of the biopsy findings altered diagnosis or management. Among the 22 patients with decreased eGFR, additional findings included superimposed acute interstitial nephritis (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with preserved eGFR and absence of associated conditions or diabetes, a positive anti-phospholipase A2 receptor test by either ELISA >20 RU/ml or a positive immunofluorescence assay confirms the diagnosis of membranous nephropathy, precluding the requirement for a kidney biopsy.

Rituximab Immunomonitoring Predicts Remission in Membranous Nephropathy

Primary membranous nephropathy (pMN) is an autoimmune kidney disease and a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Rituximab is becoming a first line therapy for patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome with proven safety and efficacy, achieving remission in 60%–80% of cases. For the remaining 20%–40% of patients there is an urgent need to identify early biomarkers of resistance to rituximab to adapt therapeutic management. In nephrotic patients, rituximab is found in the blood more transiently than in other autoimmune diseases without proteinuria, due to rituximab wasting in the urine. However, rituximab immunomonitoring is not routinely performed. We evaluated the predictive value of serum rituximab levels in patients with pMN three months after rituximab injection (month-3) on clinical remission rates six months (month-6) and 12 months (month-12) after injection and investigated predictive factors for serum rituximab levels at month-3. Sixty-eight patients treated with rituximab between July 2015 and January 2020 from two French nephrology centers were included. We identified residual rituximab levels at month-3 as a novel early predictor of remission at month-6 (p <0.0001) and month-12 (p = 0.001). Reduced likelihood of remission in patients with undetectable rituximab at month-3 was associated with lower serum albumin and higher anti-PLA2R1 titers at baseline and with lower serum albumin, higher proteinuria, higher CD19⁺ counts and higher anti-PLA2R1 titers during follow-up. In multivariate analysis, high baseline proteinuria and undetectable rituximab levels at month-3 were independent risk factors for treatment failure at month-6 and high baseline weight and undetectable rituximab levels at month-3 were independent risk factors for treatment failure at month-12. We identified serum albumin at baseline as a predictive factor for serum rituximab levels at month-3. Patients with serum albumin below 22.5 g/L at baseline had an 8.66-fold higher risk of having undetectable rituximab levels at month-3. Therefore, rituximab immunomonitoring in pMN patients treated with rituximab would allow the detection of patients at risk of treatment failure as early as month-3. Studies are needed to assess whether patients with low residual rituximab levels at month-3 may benefit from an early additional course of rituximab.

Off-Label Use of Rituximab in Patients with Different Types of Nephropathies in a Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Study

Off-label use of rituximab is commonly requested for patients with resistant nephropathies. The outcomes and tolerability of rituximab in adult patients with nephropathy treated at our hospital (from 2013 to 2018) were described. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Response was classified as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), or no response (NR) according to the KDIGO criteria. A total of 89 requests were received for 61 patients. Median age was 58 years (45.9% female). Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) (n = 30) was the most frequent indication, followed by minimal change disease (MCD) (n = 15) and secondary membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) (n = 12). Three patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) were included. After most treatment cycles in MN, a CR or PR was observed; median proteinuria levels significantly decreased for these patients (6000 mg/24h (IQR 3584-10,300) vs. 1468.8 (IQR 500-4604.25), p < 0.01). In MPGN, no response was documented after 46.7% of rituximab cycles. A CR or PR was described with the majority of rituximab cycles in MCD, with a significant decrease in proteinuria (6000 mg/24 h (IQR 4007-11,426) vs. 196.8 (IQR 100-1300), p = 0.013). No cycles produced a response in FSGS. Mean CD19+ B-cell decreased in all types of nephropathy (10.44% vs. 0.29%, p < 0.0001). Eleven patients presented infusion-related reactions, and 17 presented infectious complications. The majority of patients with MN and MCD had complete or partial responses; however, neither MPGN nor FSGS had encouraging results.

Advances in antigens associated with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Idiopathic MN (IMN), one of the forms of MN, usually has an unknown etiology. IMN is described as an autoimmune disease, and its pathogenesis is quite complex. The discovery of the M-type phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA₂R) plays an important role in promoting our understanding of IMN, although the exact mechanisms of its occurrence and development are still not completely clear. Other target antigens have been discovered one after another, as considerable progress has been made in the molecular pathomechanisms of IMN. Here, we review the findings about the target antigens associated with IMN in recent years. It is hoped that this article can provide researchers with some scientific issues or innovative ideas for future studies of IMN, which will provide clinicians with more knowledge about further improving their abilities to provide better medical care for IMN patients.

Combination of Rituximab, Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide, and Prednisone for Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Case Series With Extended Follow Up

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

B-cell depletion with rituximab has emerged as a first-line therapy for primary membranous nephropathy (MN). However, most patients do not achieve complete remission with rituximab monotherapy. In this case series, we report longer-term remission and relapse rates, anti-phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA₂R) antibody levels, B-cell levels, and serious adverse events in patients with primary MN who received rituximab combined with an initial short course of low-dose oral cyclophosphamide and a course of rapidly tapered prednisone.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

60 consecutive patients with primary MN treated with the combination of rituximab, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and prednisone at the Vasculitis and Glomerulonephritis Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

FINDINGS

After treatment initiation, median follow-up was 38 (interquartile range [IQR], 25-62) months; 100% of patients achieved partial remission, defined as a urinary protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 3 g/g and a 50% reduction from baseline, at a median of 3.4 months. By 2 years after treatment initiation, 83% achieved complete remission, defined as a UPCR < 0.3 g/g. The median time to complete remission was 12.4 months. Immunologic remission (defined by an anti-PLA₂R titer < 14 RU/mL) was achieved by 86% and 100% of anti-PLA₂R seropositive patients (n = 29) at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after treatment initiation. After 1 year, the median UPCR fell from 8.4 (IQR, 5.0-10.7) to 0.3 (IQR, 0.2-0.8) g/g (P < 0.001). No patient relapsed throughout the duration of B-cell depletion. Relapse occurred in 10% of patients at 2 years after the onset of B-cell reconstitution following the last rituximab dose. Over a combined follow-up time of 228 patient-years, 18 serious adverse events occurred. One death occurred unrelated to treatment or primary MN, and 1 patient progressed to kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy.

LIMITATIONS

Absence of a comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients with primary MN treated with combination therapy achieved partial remission and most achieved a durable complete remission with an acceptable safety profile.

Rituximab Therapy for Primary Membranous Nephropathy in a Chinese Cohort

Background: Rituximab has become one of the first-line therapies for the treatment of moderate and high-risk primary membranous nephropathy (pMN). We retrospectively reviewed 95 patients with pMN who received rituximab therapy and focused on the therapeutic effects and safety of this therapy in a Chinese cohort.

Methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients with pMN diagnosed by kidney biopsy received rituximab and were followed up for >6 months. Four weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m²) was adopted as the initial administration. Repeated single infusions were administrated to maintain B cell depletion levels of <5 cells/mL.

Results: A total of 91 patients completed rituximab therapy with the total dose of 2.4 (2.0, 3.0) g; 64/78 (82.1%) patients achieved anti-PLA2R antibody depletion in 6.0 (1.0, 12.0) months; 53/91 (58.2%) patients achieved clinical remission in 12.0 (6.0, 24.0) months, including complete remission in 18.7% of patients and partial remission in 39.6% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that severe proteinuria (OR = 1.22, P = 0.006) and the persistent positivity of anti-PLA2R antibodies (OR = 9.00, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for no-remission. The remission rate of rituximab as an initial therapy was higher than rituximab as an alternative therapy (73.1 vs. 52.3%, P = 0.038). Lastly, 45 adverse events occurred in 37 patients, but only one patient withdrew from treatment due to severe pulmonary infection.

Conclusion: Rituximab is a safe and effective treatment option for Chinese patients with pMN, especially as an initial therapy.

Rituximab in Membranous Nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of primary nephrotic syndrome among adults. The identification of phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) as target antigen in most patients changed the management of MN dramatically, and provided a rationale for B-cell depleting agents such as rituximab. The efficacy of rituximab in inducing remission has been investigated in several studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, in which complete and partial remission of proteinuria was achieved in approximately two-thirds of treated patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, rituximab is now considered a first-line treatment option for MN, especially in patients at moderate and high risk of deterioration in kidney function. However, questions remain about how to best use rituximab, including the optimal dosing regimen, a potential need for maintenance therapy, and assessment of long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of the current literature and discuss both strengths and limitations of "the new standard."

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of membranous nephropathy

Nephrotic syndrome is in adult patients mainly due to membranous nephropathy (MN) characterized by thickening of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and immune complex formation between podocytes and the GBM. Autoantibodies directed against the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin 1 domain-containing 7 A (THSD7A) can be used as diagnostic biomarkers. THSD7A seems to be of direct pathogenic significance as is suggested by experimental models and plasmapheresis in humans. Recently, further antigens like NELL-1 (neural tissue encoding protein with EGF-like repeats-1), exostosin 1 and 2 have been discovered. Thus, MN should be classified into antibody positive and antibody negative MN. More specific immunosuppressive treatments directed against B-cells and antibody production like rituximab have been introduced in addition to already existing immunosuppressive protocols including steroids, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, and calcineurin inhibitors. Antibody removal using immunoadsorption or plasmapheresis leads to short-term reduction in proteinuria and might be indicated only in patients with very severe proteinuria and complications. Studies are needed to identify a more specific immunosuppression directed against the production and effects of autoantibodies in order to protect the kidneys from autoimmune mediated tissue damage and to identify patients who require an immunosuppressive treatment, as the remission rate is high in patients with MN.

Membranous nephropathy: diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring in the post-PLA2R era

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an immune complex-mediated cause of the nephrotic syndrome that can occur in all age groups, from infants to the very elderly. However, nephrotic syndrome in children is more frequently caused by conditions such as minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and much less commonly by MN. While systemic conditions such as lupus or infections such as hepatitis B may more commonly be associated as secondary causes with MN in the younger population, primary or "idiopathic" MN has generally been considered a disease of adults. Autoantibodies both to the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and to thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A), initially described in adult MN, have now been identified in children and adolescents with MN and serve as a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in this younger population as well. Whereas definitive therapy for secondary forms of MN should be targeted at the underlying cause, immunosuppressive therapy is often necessary for primary disease. Rituximab has been successfully used in the treatment of MN, and is likely effective in children with MN as well, although dosing in the pediatric population is not well established. This review highlights the new findings in adult and pediatric MN since last reviewed in this journal.

Rituximab for the management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab therapy in the management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).

METHODS

After literature search, data from eligible studies were used to perform random-effects meta-analyses to estimate remission rates and changes in proteinuria at the latest follow-up after rituximab therapy. The outcomes were used for metaregression to identify the factors affecting the efficacy of rituximab.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis (602 patients; age 50 years [95% CI 46.8, 53.3]; 30% females [95% CI 23, 31]). Follow-up duration was 20.3 months [95% CI 17.1, 23.5]. Remission rate (67% [95% CI 61, 73]) was higher in studies with below average baseline proteinuria (76% [95% CI 61, 88]) than in studies with above average baseline proteinuria (61% [95% CI 54, 68]). The complete and partial remission rates were 26% [95% CI 20, 33] and 37% [95% CI 31, 43], respectively. Rituximab therapy significantly reduced proteinuria (mean difference between final and baseline values: - 4.90 g/day [95% CI - 6.18, - 3.63]; p < 0.00001; % reduction: 62% [95% CI 57, 68]). The reduction in proteinuria was inversely associated with baseline serum albumin levels (p = 0.021) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.00001) and was positively associated with baseline proteinuria (p < 0.00001). The remission rate or decrease in proteinuria was not significantly related to the anti-PLA₂R antibody status or previous immunosuppressant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab therapy in IMN patients can provide approximately 67% remission rate. The reduction in proteinuria was greater in patients who had higher baseline proteinuria.

Personalized Medicine for PLA2R1-Related Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Randomized Control Trial

Background: Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is a rare autoimmune disease related to PLA2R1 antibodies in 70% of cases. One third of patients enter in spontaneous remission. PLA2R1 epitopes in MN have been characterized in four different domains of PLA2R1 and a mechanism of epitope spreading from the immunodominant CysR domain to CTLD1 and/or CTLD7 and/or CTLD8 domains has been associated with poor prognosis. Epitope spreading could predict spontaneous remission (45% in non-spreader patients vs. 0.05% in spreader patients). The comparison of different regimens of rituximab dosing showed that: (i) early remission rate depends on rituximab dosing, (ii) low dose could be enough for patients with anti-PLA2R1 activity restricted to CysR, (iii) high dose may be required for spreader patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of personalized treatment in PLA2R1-related MN depending on the epitope spreading status, in comparison to the established GEMRITUX protocol.

Methods: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial will be conducted in 22 French hospitals. Sixty-four consecutive patients with PLA2R1-related MN will be randomly assigned to either the control group following the GEMRITUX protocol (symptomatic treatment for 6 months, if the nephrotic syndrome (NS) persists at month-6, two 375 mg/m² rituximab infusions at 1 week interval) or the personalized treatment group (patients with no epitope spreading at month-0 will be treated with symptomatic treatment for 6 months, if NS persists at month-6, two 375 mg/m² rituximab infusions at 1 week interval; patients with epitope spreading at month-0 or month-6 with persistent NS will be treated immediately with two 1 g rituximab infusions at 2 week interval). The primary study outcome is the rate of clinical remission at month-12. The secondary outcomes include complete and partial remissions, immunological remissions, relapses, proteinuria, albuminuria, serum creatinine, eGFR, PLA2R1 antibody titers, severe infections, lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte phenotype, residual rituximab levels at month-3 and neutralizing anti-rituximab antibodies at month-6 and month-12 after rituximab treatment.

Discussion: The results of this trial will confirm whether personalized treatment of PLA2R1-driven nephrotic MN is more efficient to induce clinical remission than the established GEMRITUX protocol, and may thus contribute to improved remission rates and reduced relapse rates.

Trial registration: NCT 03804359 trial number. Registered on 15th January 2019.

Modern view on treatment of membranous nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Since the moment of animal model creation and the recognition of podocytes damage as a key mechanism of MN development, the identification of antigens, first of all the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R), and the development of methods of PLA2R autoantibodies detection and its monitoring opened a new era in the idiopathic MN (iMN) diagnosis, treatment and prognosis evaluation. MN continues to be actively studied in the new millennium, since a number of aspects of its pathogenesis still need to be clarified, and there is still no clear opinion on the iMN treatment optimal approach. Comprehensive clinical and serological assessment of patients with iMN can be the key to individual choice of treatment protocols. In patients with aPLA2R-positive iMN, the predictor of disease remission is the aPLA2R titer decrease or aPLA2R disappearance in the blood serum, and disease relapse is associated with the aPLA2R appearance ore increase of aPLA2R titer in the circulation. Studies which were conducted by today (GEMRITUX, MENTOR, STARMEN, NICE, etc.) confirmed the acceptable safety profile and effectiveness of iMN therapy by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab): more than half of of iMN patients had remission of nephrotic syndrome or proteinuria decrease, remissions in anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies treated patients were longer compared to traditional therapy. The obtained data allows us to consider rituximab and anti-CD20 antibody therapy of a new generation not only as an alternative to the more toxic treatment with cyclophosphane and calcineurin inhibitors, but as an independent promising direction of therapy for patients with IMN, which completely changes the paradigm of treatment of this glomerulopathy.

Recurrent Proliferative Glomerulonephritis With Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposits in Kidney Allografts Treated With Anti-CD20 Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) is a distinct form of glomerulonephritis that often recurs after kidney transplantation causing severe graft injury and often failure.

METHODS

We describe post transplant outcomes and response to therapy in 20 recipients with PGNMID. Evidence of PGNMID recurrence or lack thereof was determined by protocol and clinical biopsies.

RESULTS

Histologic recurrence (deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin) occurred in 18 of 20 recipients (90%), a median of 7 (1 to 65) months post transplant. At diagnosis, recurrence was generally associated with mild or no clinical manifestations and often with mild glomerular morphologic changes by light microcopy. Four of the 18 patients with recurrence did not progress and were not treated. Another 4 patients with recurrences were treated with cyclophosphamide with or without plasmapheresis, and 2 of these grafts were lost from glomerulonephritis. Nine patients with recurrences were treated with anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab) alone, resulting in improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.5 ± 16 versus 38.8 ± 13.3 mL/min/1.73 m, P = 0.011) and proteinuria (1280 [117 to 3752] versus 168 [83 to 1613] mg/24 h, P = 0.012) although complete clinical remission was rare. One graft in this later group was lost from recurrence 141 months post transplant. Posttreatment biopsies demonstrated stable or improved glomerular histology in most cases. However, PGNMID did not resolve in any case. Four patients received rituximab 4 months pretransplant to prevent recurrence. However, 3 had mild recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab treatment of early PGNMID recurrence is effective, resulting in reasonable, long-term graft survival. Whether pretransplant rituximab modifies the course of recurrence requires additional studies.

Use of Rituximab in Management of Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis

Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is a form of glomerulonephritis characterized by loss of renal function within weeks. Although a variety of underlying causes can trigger RPGN, the ultimate pathologic mechanism is the podocyte and epithelial activation leading to the crescent formation. Rituximab has been increasingly and successfully used for autoimmune conditions in recent years. Treatment of RPGN is based on the underlying condition, but specific clinical guidelines are lacking. In this article, we have tried to establish the role of rituximab in the management of patients with RPGN. All the studies we have used were found in the PubMed database, limited to studies involving adults. Animal studies and studies involving the pediatric population were excluded. The currently available literature does not support switching to rituximab as the first-line agent. It has failed to prove consistently superior to other medications. However, combined with other commonly prescribed treatment regimens, namely corticosteroids, with or without cytotoxic drugs, rituximab has shown efficacy in many studies. Therefore, we have concluded that the most prudent use of rituximab in patients with RPGN would be in those with disease refractory to standard management with corticosteroids and cytotoxic drugs or in those who have intolerable side effects. We believe that clinicians should keep reporting any cases of RPGN treated with rituximab so that a more clear pattern emerges and more exact treatment guidelines can be made.

Ofatumumab for multirelapsing membranous nephropathy complicated by rituximab-induced serum-sickness

Rituximab (375 mg/m²) achieved remission of the first episode and six relapses of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in a young male patient with podocyte phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA₂R)-related membranous nephropathy (MN) refractory to steroids and cyclosporine. Between-treatments interval averaged 17.4±4.2 months. The seventh infusion was complicated by delayed serum-sickness, which resolved with steroids. On subsequent relapse, the fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab (300 mg) achieved remission of the NS, without significant side effects. Circulating CD19⁺ B cells were depleted, proteinuria decreased from 10.9 to 1.3 g/day, and serum albumin, immunoglobulin levels and glomerular filtration rate normalised. Twenty-eight months later, despite transient anti-PLA₂R depletion, ofatumumab (100 mg) failed to induce remission of the eighth relapse. Remission was safely achieved 5 months later with repeated ofatumumab infusion (300 mg). This treatment (€723) was less expensive than rituximab (€1801). Ofatumumab could be a safe and cost/effective rescue therapy for patients with MN sensitised against rituximab.

Neutralizing Anti-Rituximab Antibodies and Relapse in Membranous Nephropathy Treated With Rituximab

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease associated with antibodies against podocyte proteins: M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) or thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) in 70 and 3% of patients, respectively. Antibody titer is correlated with disease activity: rising during active disease and decreasing before remission. Therefore, decreasing PLA2R1-Antibodies titer has become an important goal of therapy. Rituximab a chimeric monoclonal antibody induces remission in 60-80% of primary MN patients. All monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can elicit antidrug antibodies, which may interfere with therapeutic response. We aim to analyze the relevance of anti-rituximab antibodies on the outcome of MN after a first course of rituximab. Forty-four MN patients were included and treated with two 1 g infusions of rituximab at 2-weeks interval. Anti-rituximab antibodies, CD19 count, and clinical response were analyzed. Then, we (i) analyzed the association of anti-rituximab antibodies at month-6 with response to treatment: remission, relapse and the need for another rituximab course; (ii) confirmed if anti-rituximab antibodies could neutralize rituximab B-cells depletion; and (iii) tested whether anti-rituximab antibodies could cross-inhibit new humanized anti-CD20 therapies. Anti-rituximab antibodies were detected in 10 patients (23%). Seventeen patients received a second rituximab course after a median time of 12 months (7-12), following nine cases of resistance and eight relapses. Anti-rituximab antibodies were significantly associated with faster B-cell reconstitution at month-6 (75 [57-89] vs. 2 [0-41] cells/μl, p = 0.006), higher proteinuria 12 months after rituximab infusion (1.7 [0.7; 5.8] vs. 0.6 [0.2; 3.4], p = 0.03) and before treatment modification (3.5 [1.6; 7.1] vs. 1.7 [0.2; 1.7] p = 0.0004). Remission rate 6 months after rituximab was not different according to anti-rituximab status (p > 0.99) but the rate of relapse was significantly higher for patients with anti-rituximab antibodies (p < 0.001). These patients required more frequently a second course of rituximab infusions (7/10 vs. 10/34, p = 0.03). Anti-rituximab antibodies neutralized rituximab activity in 8/10 patients and cross-reacted with other humanized monoclonal antibodies in only two patients. Three patients with anti-rituximab antibodies were successfully treated with ofatumumab. Anti-rituximab antibodies could neutralize rituximab B cells cytotoxicity and impact clinical outcome of MN patients. Humanized anti-CD20 seems to be a satisfying therapeutic alternative for patients with anti-rituximab antibodies and resistant or relapsing MN.

Rituximab use in adult glomerulopathies and its rationale

Glomerulopathies are one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease. In the last years, clinical research has made significant contributions to the understanding of such conditions. Recently, rituximab (RTX) has appeared as a reasonably safe treatment. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines (KDIGO) recommended RTX only as initial treatment in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis (AAV) and in non-responders patients with lupus nephritis (LN), but these guidelines have not been updated since 2012. Nowadays, RTX seems to be at least as effective as other immunosuppressive regimens in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). In minimal-change disease, (MCD) this drug might allow a long-lasting remission period in steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing patients. Preliminary results support the use of RTX in patients with pure membranous LN and immunoglobulin-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), but not in patients with class III/IV LN or complement-mediated MPGN. No conclusion can be drawn in idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody glomerulonephritis (anti-GBM GN) because studies are small, heterogeneous, and scarce. Lastly, immunosuppression including RTX is not particularly useful in IgA nephropathy. This review presents the general background, outcomes, and safety for RTX treatment in different glomerulopathies. In this regard, we describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in adults, whenever possible. A literature search was performed using clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed.

Rituximab use in adult glomerulopathies and its rationale

Glomerulopathies are one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease. In the last years, clinical research has made significant contributions to the understanding of such conditions. Recently, rituximab (RTX) has appeared as a reasonably safe treatment. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines (KDIGO) recommended RTX only as initial treatment in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis (AAV) and in non-responders patients with lupus nephritis (LN), but these guidelines have not been updated since 2012. Nowadays, RTX seems to be at least as effective as other immunosuppressive regimens in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). In minimal-change disease, (MCD) this drug might allow a long-lasting remission period in steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing patients. Preliminary results support the use of RTX in patients with pure membranous LN and immunoglobulin-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), but not in patients with class III/IV LN or complement-mediated MPGN. No conclusion can be drawn in idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody glomerulonephritis (anti-GBM GN) because studies are small, heterogeneous, and scarce. Lastly, immunosuppression including RTX is not particularly useful in IgA nephropathy. This review presents the general background, outcomes, and safety for RTX treatment in different glomerulopathies. In this regard, we describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in adults, whenever possible. A literature search was performed using clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed.

Rituximab in Patients With Phospholipase A2 Receptor-Associated Membranous Nephropathy and Severe CKD

Introduction

Patients with phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R)–associated membranous nephropathy and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease are at high risk of end-stage kidney disease. In recent years, rituximab (RTX) emerged as a safe and efficient treatment for patients with PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy. Whether its use is also appropriate in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min per 1.73 m² has not been investigated.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed characteristics and outcome of 13 patients with PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease who received a total of 14 consecutive RTX treatments from January 2012 to March 2018. The treatment regimen consisted of either 2 weekly infusions of 375 mg/m² or 2 RTX infusions of 1 g/d two weeks apart. When needed, the regimen was repeated to achieve immunological remission.

Results

The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum albumin level, and urinary protein level at the first RTX infusion were 18 ± 7 ml/min per 1.73 m², 25.2 ± 5.4 g/l, and 13.2 ± 7.5 g/d, respectively, with all patients being tested positive for serum PLA2R antibodies. Ten treatment courses led to an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate and remission of nephrotic syndrome after a median follow-up of 40.8 months (interquartile range, 14.8–46.8). Conversely, 4 RTX treatments were unsuccessful, with patients requiring chronic hemodialysis within 1 year. The urinary albumin-to-protein ratio before treatment was predictive of renal response. Immunological remission occurred after 11 treatment courses and was associated with clinical response in 10 of 11 patients. Three patients experienced severe adverse events.

Conclusion

RTX seems effective and reasonably safe in PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease. Immunological remission is associated with a good clinical outcome.

Understanding Inter-Individual Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Disposition

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are currently the largest and most dominant class of therapeutic proteins. Inter-individual variability has been observed for several mAbs; however, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms and factors contributing to inter-subject differences in mAb disposition is still lacking. In this review, we analyze the mechanisms of antibody disposition and the putative mechanistic determinants of inter-individual variability. Results from in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies were reviewed evaluate the role of the neonatal Fc receptor and Fc gamma receptors (expression and polymorphism), target properties (expression, shedding, turnover, internalization, heterogeneity, polymorphism), and the influence of anti-drug antibodies. Particular attention is given to the influence of co-administered drugs and disease, and to the physiological relevance of covariates identified by population pharmacokinetic modeling, as determinants of variability in mAb pharmacokinetics.

Rituximab versus steroids and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease may have different long-term outcomes. After 10 years of follow-up, 35%-50% of the untreated patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome may die or progress to end stage renal disease. The 2012 KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines recommend that initial therapy should consist of alternating steroids and an alkylating agent for 6 months. Recent observational studies showed that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab may be effective in inducing remission. We designed a pilot multicentre randomised trial to inform the design of a larger trial testing the efficacy and safety of treatment with steroids and cyclophosphamide versus rituximab in patients with primary MN and heavy proteinuria (>3.5 g/24 hours).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This pilot, open-label, two-parallel-arm, randomised clinical trial will enrol 70 patients with primary MN and heavy proteinuria. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention arm (rituximab) or the active comparator arm (corticosteroid/alkylating-agent therapy). The study will provide estimates of the probability of complete remission of proteinuria and risk of serious side effects at 12 months to inform the design of a larger trial. We will also assess the recruitment potential of each participating centre to address study feasibility.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial received ethics approval from the local ethics boards. We will publish pilot data to inform the design of a larger clinical trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03018535; 2011-006115-59.