Network Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal, HR-Positive Breast Cancer

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is controversial and requires a comprehensive analysis for optimal therapy assessment. Therefore, a two-step Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant regimens.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing various neoadjuvant therapies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were included. NMA and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted using Stata (version 14), R (version 4.2.3), and Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies (5,625 patients) were eligible. NMA of objective response rate (ORR) indicated the highest SUCRA for chemotherapy (CT) and chemotherapy with anthracycline (CT(A)). Pathologic complete response (PCR) NMA demonstrated significant PCR improvement with chemotherapy regimens containing programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-1i/PD-L1i) and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Combined analysis considering both the ORR and safety highlighted CT(A)'s efficacy and toxicity balance.

CONCLUSIONS

CT(A) and CT showed improved ORR compared with alternative regimens. CT(A) combined with PD-1/PD-L1 or PARP inhibitors significantly increased PCR rates. Comprehensive assessment of both ORR and safety indicated that CT(A) represents an optimal neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, whereas AI + CDK4/6 inhibitors rank solely behind chemotherapy.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024538948. International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) registration number INPLASY202440092.

Breast-conserving surgery is an appropriate procedure for centrally located breast cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The evidence of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) applied in centrally located breast cancer (CLBC) is absent. This study aims to investigate the long-term survival of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in centrally located breast cancer (CLBC) compared with mastectomy in CLBC and BCT in non-CLBC.

METHODS

Two hundred ten thousand four hundred nine women with unilateral T1-2 breast cancer undergoing BCT or mastectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were assessed via log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline features, and the multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio [HR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI] for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 91 months, the BCSS and OS rates in patients who received BCT were greater than those patients treated with mastectomy in the entire CLBC set. Multivariable Cox analyses showed that CLBC patients who received BCT had better BCSS (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.55-0.80, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.68-0.90, p = 0.001) than patients who received a mastectomy, but there were no significant differences of BCSS (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.47-0.90, p = 0.009) and OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.65-1.04, p = 0.110) after PSM. In patients treated with BCT, CLBC patients had a similar BCSS (HR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87-1.12, p = 0.850) but a worse OS (HR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.01-1.18, p = 0.040) compared to that of the non-CLBC patient, but there was no significant difference both BCSS (HR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.88-1.24, p = 0.614) and OS (HR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.97-1.20, p = 0.168) after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that BCT should be an acceptable and preferable alternative to mastectomy for well-selected patients with CLBC.

A rapid reduction in tumor size by cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in hormone receptor-positive postpartum breast cancer: a case report of two patients and a review of the literature

Background

Postpartum breast cancer (PPBC) as an independent entity different from PABC. PPBC is defined as breast cancer (BC) diagnosed within 5 years after delivery in many relevant literatures and is associated with a poor prognosis and a decrease in overall survival. PPBC patients commonly present with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) phenotype, multifocal lesions, and lymph node metastasis. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) PPBC is an under-investigated subtype. In PPBC, the risk of death of HR+ subtype significantly increased two-fold, while that was only modestly increased for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, and was not significant in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) subtype. HR+ PPBC is a subtype associating with enhanced signatures of cell cycle control, T-cell activation and exhaustion, decreased HR signaling, and altered P53 signaling. The recommended treatment for HR+ PPBC patients is still lacking. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are used as a novel treatment standard not only in pretreated patients but also in the first-line setting of HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no clinical case report on the application and efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ PPBC patients.

Case Description

This article describes the clinical cases of two patients with advanced HR+ PPBC who were rapidly relieved after receiving leuprorelin combined with letrozole combined with dalpiciclib. We reviewed the related literature of PPBC, and found that HR+ PPBC has not been clinically classified as a BC subtype, and only some basic studies suggested that HR+ PPBC may be sensitive to CDK4/6 inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to provide the basis for the related research on the therapeutic effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ PPBC through the report of clinical cases.

Conclusions

This article reports for the first time the good therapeutic effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors on HR+ PPBC patients. Based on our findings, we suggest that dalpiciclib combined with endocrine therapy can be considered as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced HR+ PPBC. Our case report provides new clinical evidence for the related research on the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ PPBC therapy.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: A potential strategy for ER-positive breast cancer

A potential strategy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer is necessary to replace neoadjuvant chemotherapy which has limited benefit. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAE) has been indicated to be a favorable alternate approach to downstage large or locally advanced breast cancer in ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (ER+/HER2-) patients, especially postmenopausal women. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of various endocrine agents in NAE. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven superiority over tamoxifen as a suitable choice to optimize treatment efficacy. Fulvestrant was recently reported as an effective agent, similar to AIs. Furthermore, the addition of targeted agents exerts synergistic antiproliferative effects with endocrine agents and rapidly improves response rates in both endocrine sensitive and resistant tumors. The neoadjuvant platform provides a unique opportunity to define the appropriate strategy and address the mechanisms of endocrine resistance. In addition, the predictive value of biomarkers and genomic assays in NAE is under investigation to evaluate individual effects and validate biomarker-based strategies. In this review, we discuss the most relevant evidence on the potential of NAE for ER+ breast cancer. The current understanding also offers new insights into the identification of the optimal settings and valuable predictive tools of NAE to guide clinical treatment decisions and achieve beneficial therapeutic effects.

Everolimus-induced pulmonary toxicity: Findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging

The everolimus-exemestane combination is indicated in advanced breast cancer treatment and usually well tolerated. The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of everolimus lung side effects and investigate their imaging characteristics on positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose combined with computerized tomography (F-FDG PET/CT).Our single-center retrospective descriptive study systematically included all patients with metastatic breast cancer treated by this combination (n = 29 representing 57 F-FDG PET/CT). Number of segments involved was quantified. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic target volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. Severe pneumopathy was studied by subgroup analysis.Pleuroparenchymal anomalies rate detected on F-FDG PET/CT was 62%. Alveolar-interstitial lesions were mainly observed (89%) and affected 2.8 segments (0.5-11.5) with a median of 2 segments. S7 and S10 were the most involved segments with SUVmax 3.9 (1.3-8.8) and SUVmean 2.2 (0.7-4.9). Statistically significant difference (P = .02) was found with number of segment involved to characterize severe pneumopathy (average of 6.3 segments [2.5-11.5] vs 1.9 segments [0.5-8] for interstitial lung disease) but not with SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG (P = .14, 0.22, 0.22, and 0.17, respectively).The F-FDG PET/CT could highlight pulmonary everolimus side effects, with a typical imaging pattern: alveolar-interstitial opacities associated with moderate uptake, more or less extensive, mainly affecting the lower lobes. Rarely, a pseudotumoral aspect may be detected, corresponding to a pitfall. MTV or TLG showed a tendency to differentiate severe pneumopathy vs interstitial lung disease but no statistically significant differences was observed contrarily to the number of segments involved. Further studies are necessary to determine if the F-FDG PET/CT could early predict adverse effects of mTOR inhibitors.

Network Meta-Analysis on the Effects of DNA Damage Response-Related Gene Mutations on Overall Survival of Breast Cancer Based on TCGA Database

The study was conducted for comparing the effects of 12 DNA damage response gene mutations (CHEK1, CHEK2, RAD51, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, ATM, ATR, MDC1, PARP1, and FANCF) on the overall survival (OS) of breast cancer (BC) patients. We searched the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database from inception to September 2016. Studies that investigated the association between 12 DNA damage responses related genes and BC consolidated into this Network meta-analysis, by comparing directly or indirectly to evaluate the hazard rate (HR) value and the surface under the cumulative sequence ranking curves (SUCRA). In total four articles were involved. Our results demonstrated 12 DNA damage response gene mutations were associated to the poor prognosis of BC patients (CHEK1: HR = 9.9, 95%CI = 3.6-26.0; CHEK2: HR = 6.9, 95%CI = 3.1-15.0; RAD51: HR = 5.8, 95%CI = 2.2-15.0; BRCA1: HR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.3-6.1; BRCA2: HR = 3.9, 95%CI = 2.0-7.7; MLH1: HR = 11.0, 95%CI = 3.4-33.0; MSH2: HR = 6.5, 95%CI = 2.1-20.0; ATM: HR = 5.6, 95%CI = 2.6-12.0; ATR: HR = 2.9, 95%CI = 1.3-6.9; MDC1: HR = 15.0, 95%CI = 5.0-45.0; PARP1: HR = 3.4, 95%CI = 1.8-6.6; FANCF: HR = 6.0, 95%CI = 1.8-20.0). SUCRA results revealed that the mutation of MDC1 gene was related to the worst prognosis in patients with BC (SUCRA = 17.32%). DNA damage response gene mutations were associated to the poor prognosis in patients with BC and the BC patients with MDC1 gene mutation had the worst prognosis. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 4728-4734, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Potential prognostic value of clinical characteristics, hormone status and major depressive disorder in breast cancer

AIM

To identify independent factors predicting overall survival (OS) of breast cancer (BC) patients.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Two hundred and eighty one women with BC were recruited and clinical characteristics including lymphovascular invasion, clinical stage of Tumor Node Metastasis and positive axillary lymph nodes were documented; immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to examine the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67; major depressive disorder was assessed with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V.

RESULTS

Multivariable analyses indicated that in BC patients, lymphovascular invasion, Tumor Node Metastasis, pN, Ki-67 and major depressive disorder were significantly negatively correlated with OS; estrogen receptor was significantly positively associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnostic approaches and effective psychologic intervention are indispensable for BC patients.

Implementing neoadjuvant endocrine strategies in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been widely adopted as it increases breast conservation rates, permits the in vivo testing of the activity of chemotherapeutics and offers the opportunity to conduct translational research based on longitudinal assessments of tumor tissue, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy has been met with skepticism owing to slow regression rates and a low chance for pathologic remission. Areas covered: Herein, the results of clinical trials comparing different endocrine agents as neoadjuvant treatment, endocrine therapy with chemotherapy, treatment duration, novel combinations and putative biomarkers are reviewed, with the aim to better understand the current and future role of this modality in clinical practice. Expert commentary: Available evidence clearly indicates that, in properly selected patients, short-term outcomes do not differ compared to chemotherapy. In addition, the realization that its effects at the cellular level occur shortly after its initiation and have important prognostic implications, could serve as a tool for the early identification of non-responders. Ongoing trials which integrate novel agents in addition to endocrine therapies will help guide treatment decisions and may establish neoadjuvant endocrine therapy as a standard of care for well-defined patient subgroups.