Nucleosomes determine their own patch size in base excision repair

Structural basis of gap-filling DNA synthesis in the nucleosome by DNA Polymerase β

Single-strand breaks (SSBs) are one of the most prevalent forms of DNA damage found in the chromatinized genome and are repaired by single-strand break repair (SSBR) or base excision repair (BER). DNA polymerase beta (Pol β) is the primary enzyme responsible for processing the 1-nt gap intermediate in chromatin during SSBR and BER. To date, the mechanism used by Pol β to process a 1-nt gap in the context of chromatin remains poorly understood. Here, we use biochemical assays and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine the kinetic and structural basis of gap-filling DNA synthesis in the nucleosome by Pol β. This work establishes that Pol β uses a global DNA sculpting mechanism for processing 1-nt gaps in the nucleosome during SSBR and BER, providing fundamental insight into DNA repair in chromatin.

HPF1 Regulates Pol β Efficiency in Nucleosomes via the Modulation of Total Poly(ADP-Ribose) Synthesis

The maintenance of genome stability and the prevention of genotoxic damage to DNA require immediate DNA repair. In the cell, the repair process is usually preceded by a release of DNA from complexes with chromatin proteins accompanied by nucleosome sliding, relaxing or disassembly. Base excision DNA repair (BER) corrects the most common DNA lesions, which does not disturb the DNA helix dramatically. Notably, small DNA lesions can be repaired in chromatin without global chromatin decompaction. One of the regulatory mechanisms is poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, leading to the relaxation of the nucleosome. In our work, we demonstrated that recently a discovered protein, HPF1, can modulate the efficiency of one of the key BER stages-DNA synthesis-via the regulation of total poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Accordingly, we investigated both short-patch and long-patch DNA synthesis catalyzed by DNA polymerase β (pol β; main polymerase in BER) and showed that HPF1's influence on the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation catalyzed by PARP1 and especially by PARP2 results in more efficient DNA synthesis in the case of the short-patch BER pathway in nucleosomes. Additionally, HPF1-dependent poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation was found to positively regulate long-patch BER.

Structural basis of gap-filling DNA synthesis in the nucleosome by DNA Polymerase β

Single-strand breaks (SSBs) are one of the most prevalent forms of DNA damage found in the chromatinized genome and are repaired by direct single-strand break repair (SSBR) or base excision repair (BER). DNA polymerase beta (Pol β) is the primary enzyme responsible for processing the 1-nt gap intermediate in chromatin during SSBR and BER. However, the mechanism used by Pol β to process a 1-nt gap in the context of the nucleosome and chromatin remains poorly understood. Here, we use biochemical assays and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine the kinetic and structural basis of gap-filling DNA synthesis in the nucleosome by Pol β. Kinetic analysis identified that gap-filling DNA synthesis in the nucleosome by Pol β is position-dependent, where solvent exposed 1-nt gaps are processed more efficiently than histone-occluded 1-nt gaps. A series of cryo-EM structures of Pol β bound to a solvent-exposed 1-nt gap in the nucleosome reveal a global DNA sculpting mechanism for 1-nt gap recognition, which is mediated by sequential engagement of the Pol β lyase domain and polymerase domain. Finally, cryo-EM structures of Pol β bound to 1-nt gaps at two additional positions in the nucleosomal DNA define the structural basis for position-dependent nucleotide insertion in the nucleosome. This work establishes the mechanism used by Pol β for processing 1-nt gaps in the nucleosome during SSBR and BER, providing fundamental insight into DNA repair in chromatin.

Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer

DNA damage response (DDR) pathway is the coordinated cellular network dealing with the identification, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. It tightly regulates cell cycle progression and promotes DNA repair to minimize DNA damage to daughter cells. Key proteins involved in DDR are frequently mutated/inactivated in human cancers and promote genomic instability, a recognized hallmark of cancer. Besides being an intrinsic property of tumors, DDR also represents a unique therapeutic opportunity. Indeed, inhibition of DDR is expected to delay repair, causing persistent unrepaired breaks, to interfere with cell cycle progression, and to sensitize cancer cells to several DNA-damaging agents, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In addition, DDR defects in cancer cells have been shown to render these cells more dependent on the remaining pathways, which could be targeted very specifically (synthetic lethal approach). Research over the past two decades has led to the synthesis and testing of hundreds of small inhibitors against key DDR proteins, some of which have shown antitumor activity in human cancers. In parallel, the search for synthetic lethality interaction is broadening the use of DDR inhibitors. In this review, we discuss the state-of-art of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated, ataxia-telangiectasia-and-Rad3-related protein, checkpoint kinase 1, Wee1 and Polθ inhibitors, highlighting the results obtained in the ongoing clinical trials both in monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Global screening of base excision repair in nucleosome core particles

DNA damage is a fundamental molecular cause of genomic instability. Base excision repair (BER) is one line of defense to minimize the potential mutagenicity and/or toxicity derived from damaged nucleobase lesions. However, BER in the context of chromatin, in which eukaryotic genomic DNA is compacted through a hierarchy of DNA-histone protein interactions, is not fully understood. Here, we investigate the activity of BER enzymes at 27 unique geometric locations in a nucleosome core particle (NCP), which is the minimal unit of packaging in chromatin. The BER enzymes include uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), AP endonuclease 1 (APE1), DNA polymerase β (Pol β), and DNA ligase IIIα complexed with X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (LigIIIα/XRCC1). This global analysis of BER reveals that initiation of the repair event by UDG is dictated by the rotational position of the lesion. APE1 has robust activity at locations where repair is initiated whereas the repair event stalls at the Pol β nucleotide incorporation step within the central ∼45 bp of nucleosomal DNA. The final step of the repair, catalyzed by LigIIIα/XRCC1, is achieved only in the entry/exit regions of the NCP when nick sites are transiently exposed by unwrapping from the histones. Kinetic assays further elucidate that the location of the damaged lesion modulates enzymatic activity. Notably, these data indicate that some of the BER enzymes can act at a significant number of locations even in the absence of chromatin remodelers or other cellular factors. These results inform genome wide maps of DNA damage and mutations and contribute to our understanding of mutational hotspots and signatures.

Redox-Based Defect Detection in Packed DNA: Insights from Hybrid Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The impact of an 8-oxoguanine (8oxoG) defect on the redox properties of DNA within the nucleosome core particle (NCP) was investigated employing hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) molecular dynamics simulations of native and 8oxoG-containing NCP systems with an explicit representation of a biologically relevant environment. Two distinct NCP positions with varying solvent accessibility were considered for 8oxoG insertion. In both cases, it is found that the presence of 8oxoG drastically decreases the redox free energy of oxidation by roughly 1 eV, which is very similar to what was recently reported for free native and 8oxoG-containing DNA. In contrast, the effect of 8oxoG on the reorganization free energy is even smaller for packed DNA (decrease of 0.13 and 0.01 eV for defect-free and defect-containing systems, respectively) compared to the one for free DNA (0.25 eV), consistent with the increased rigidity of the NCP as compared to free DNA. Furthermore, the presence of an 8oxoG defect does not yield any significant changes in the packed DNA structure. Such a conclusion favors the idea that in the case of chromatin, defect-induced changes in DNA redox chemistry can also be exploited to detect damaged bases via DNA-mediated hole transfer.

A half century of exploring DNA excision repair in chromatin

DNA in eukaryotic cells is packaged into the compact and dynamic structure of chromatin. This packaging is a double-edged sword for DNA repair and genomic stability. Chromatin restricts the access of repair proteins to DNA lesions embedded in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures. However, chromatin also serves as a signaling platform in which post-translational modifications of histones and other chromatin-bound proteins promote lesion recognition and repair. Similarly, chromatin modulates the formation of DNA damage, promoting or suppressing lesion formation depending on the chromatin context. Therefore, the modulation of DNA damage and its repair in chromatin is crucial to our understanding of the fate of potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic lesions in DNA. Here, we survey many of the landmark findings on DNA damage and repair in chromatin over the last 50 years (i.e., since the beginning of this field), focusing on excision repair, the first repair mechanism studied in the chromatin landscape. For example, we highlight how the impact of chromatin on these processes explains the distinct patterns of somatic mutations observed in cancer genomes.

Generation of Recombinant Nucleosomes Containing Site-Specific DNA Damage

Eukaryotic DNA exists in chromatin, where the genomic DNA is packaged into a fundamental repeating unit known as the nucleosome. In this chromatin environment, our genomic DNA is constantly under attack by exogenous and endogenous stressors that can lead to DNA damage. Importantly, this DNA damage must be repaired to prevent the accumulation of mutations and ensure normal cellular function. To date, most in-depth biochemical studies of DNA repair proteins have been performed in the context of free duplex DNA. However, chromatin can serve as a barrier that DNA repair enzymes must navigate in order find, access, and process DNA damage in the cell. To facilitate future studies of DNA repair in chromatin, we describe a protocol for generating nucleosome containing site-specific DNA damage that can be utilized for a variety of in vitro applications. This protocol describes several key steps including how to generate damaged DNA oligonucleotides, the expression and purification of recombinant histones, the refolding of histone complexes, and the reconstitution of nucleosomes containing site-specific DNA damage. These methods will enable researchers to generate nucleosomes containing site-specific DNA damage for extensive biochemical and structural studies of DNA repair in the nucleosome.

Obstacles and opportunities for base excision repair in chromatin

Most eukaryotic DNA is packaged into chromatin, which is made up of tandemly repeating nucleosomes. This packaging of DNA poses a significant barrier to the various enzymes that must act on DNA, including DNA damage response enzymes that interact intimately with DNA to prevent mutations and cell death. To regulate access to certain DNA regions, chromatin remodeling, variant histone exchange, and histone post-translational modifications have been shown to assist several DNA repair pathways including nucleotide excision repair, single strand break repair, and double strand break repair. While these chromatin-level responses have been directly linked to various DNA repair pathways, how they modulate the base excision repair (BER) pathway remains elusive. This review highlights recent findings that demonstrate how BER is regulated by the packaging of DNA into nucleosome core particles (NCPs) and higher orders of chromatin structures. We also summarize the available data that indicate BER may be enabled by chromatin modifications and remodeling.

Timely termination of repair DNA synthesis by ATAD5 is important in oxidative DNA damage-induced single-strand break repair

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generate oxidized bases and single-strand breaks (SSBs), which are fixed by base excision repair (BER) and SSB repair (SSBR), respectively. Although excision and repair of damaged bases have been extensively studied, the function of the sliding clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), including loading/unloading, remains unclear. We report that, in addition to PCNA loading by replication factor complex C (RFC), timely PCNA unloading by the ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5 (ATAD5)-RFC-like complex is important for the repair of ROS-induced SSBs. We found that PCNA was loaded at hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-generated direct SSBs after the 3'-terminus was converted to the hydroxyl moiety by end-processing enzymes. However, PCNA loading rarely occurred during BER of oxidized or alkylated bases. ATAD5-depleted cells were sensitive to acute H2O2 treatment but not methyl methanesulfonate treatment. Unexpectedly, when PCNA remained on DNA as a result of ATAD5 depletion, H2O2-induced repair DNA synthesis increased in cancerous and normal cells. Based on higher H2O2-induced DNA breakage and SSBR protein enrichment by ATAD5 depletion, we propose that extended repair DNA synthesis increases the likelihood of DNA polymerase stalling, shown by increased PCNA monoubiquitination, and consequently, harmful nick structures are more frequent.

Chromatin and other obstacles to base excision repair: potential roles in carcinogenesis

DNA is comprised of chemically reactive nucleobases that exist under a constant barrage from damaging agents. Failure to repair chemical modifications to these nucleobases can result in mutations that can cause various diseases, including cancer. Fortunately, the base excision repair (BER) pathway can repair modified nucleobases and prevent these deleterious mutations. However, this pathway can be hindered through several mechanisms. For instance, mutations to the enzymes in the BER pathway have been identified in cancers. Biochemical characterisation of these mutants has elucidated various mechanisms that inhibit their activity. Furthermore, the packaging of DNA into chromatin poses another obstacle to the ability of BER enzymes to function properly. Investigations of BER in the base unit of chromatin, the nucleosome core particle (NCP), have revealed that the NCP acts as a complex substrate for BER enzymes. The constituent proteins of the NCP, the histones, also have variants that can further impact the structure of the NCP and may modulate access of enzymes to the packaged DNA. These histone variants have also displayed significant clinical effects both in carcinogenesis and patient prognosis. This review focuses on the underlying molecular mechanisms that present obstacles to BER and the relationship of these obstacles to cancer. In addition, several chemotherapeutics induce DNA damage that can be repaired by the BER pathway and understanding obstacles to BER can inform how resistance and/or sensitivity to these therapies may occur. With the understanding of these molecular mechanisms, current chemotherapeutic treatment regiments may be improved, and future therapies developed.

Impact of PARP1, PARP2 & PARP3 on the Base Excision Repair of Nucleosomal DNA

DNA is constantly attacked by different damaging agents; therefore, it requires frequent repair. On the one hand, the base excision repair (BER) system is responsible for the repair of the most frequent DNA lesions. On the other hand, the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) is one of the main DNA damage response reactions that is catalysed by members of the PARP family. PARP1, which belongs to the PARP family and performs approximately 90% of PAR synthesis in cells, could be considered a main regulator of the BER process. Most of the experimental data concerning BER investigation have been obtained using naked DNA. However, in the context of the eukaryotic cell, DNA is compacted in the nucleus, and the lowest compaction level is represented by the nucleosome. Thus, the organization of DNA into the nucleosome impacts the DNA-protein interactions that are involved in BER processes. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) is thought to regulate the initiation of the BER process at the chromatin level. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms involved in BER in the nucleosomal context and the potential effect of PARylation, which is catalysed by DNA-dependent PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3 proteins, on this process.

Petri net-based model of the human DNA base excision repair pathway

Cellular DNA is daily exposed to several damaging agents causing a plethora of DNA lesions. As a first aid to restore DNA integrity, several enzymes got specialized in damage recognition and lesion removal during the process called base excision repair (BER). A large number of DNA damage types and several different readers of nucleic acids lesions during BER pathway as well as two sub-pathways were considered in the definition of a model using the Petri net framework. The intuitive graphical representation in combination with precise mathematical analysis methods are the strong advantages of the Petri net-based representation of biological processes and make Petri nets a promising approach for modeling and analysis of human BER. The reported results provide new information that will aid efforts to characterize in silico knockouts as well as help to predict the sensitivity of the cell with inactivated repair proteins to different types of DNA damage. The results can also help in identifying the by-passing pathways that may lead to lack of pronounced phenotypes associated with mutations in some of the proteins. This knowledge is very useful when DNA damage-inducing drugs are introduced for cancer therapy, and lack of DNA repair is desirable for tumor cell death.

Nucleosomes Regulate Base Excision Repair in Chromatin

Chromatin is a significant barrier to many DNA damage response (DDR) factors, such as DNA repair enzymes, that process DNA lesions to reduce mutations and prevent cell death; yet, paradoxically, chromatin also has a critical role in many signaling pathways that regulate the DDR. The primary level of DNA packaging in chromatin is the nucleosome core particle (NCP), consisting of DNA wrapped around an octamer of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Here, we review recent studies characterizing how the packaging of DNA into nucleosomes modulates the activity of the base excision repair (BER) pathway and dictates BER subpathway choice. We also review new evidence indicating that the histone amino-terminal tails coordinately regulate multiple DDR pathways during the repair of alkylation damage in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Unencumbered Pol β lyase activity in nucleosome core particles

Packaging of DNA into the nucleosome core particle (NCP) is considered to exert constraints to all DNA-templated processes, including base excision repair where Pol β catalyzes two key enzymatic steps: 5'-dRP lyase gap trimming and template-directed DNA synthesis. Despite its biological significance, knowledge of Pol β activities on NCPs is still limited. Here, we show that removal of the 5'-dRP block by Pol β is unaffected by NCP constraints at all sites tested and is even enhanced near the DNA ends. In contrast, strong inhibition of DNA synthesis is observed. These results indicate 5'-dRP gap trimming proceeds unperturbed within the NCP; whereas, gap filling is strongly limited. In the absence of additional factors, base excision repair in NCPs will stall at the gap-filling step.

HMGB1 Stimulates Activity of Polymerase β on Nucleosome Substrates

The process of base excision repair (BER) recognizes and repairs small lesions or inappropriate bases on DNA through either a short-patch or long-patch pathway. The enzymes involved in BER have been well-characterized on DNA substrates, and, somewhat surprisingly, many of these enzymes, including several DNA glycosylases, AP endonuclease (APE), FEN1 endonuclease, and DNA ligases, have been shown to have activity on DNA substrates within nucleosomes. DNA polymerase β (Pol β), however, exhibits drastically reduced or no activity on nucleosomal DNA. Interestingly, acetylation of Pol β, by the acetyltransferase p300, inhibits its 5' dRP-lyase activity and presumably pushes repair of DNA substrates through the long-patch base excision repair (LP-BER) pathway. In addition to the major enzymes involved in BER, a chromatin architectural factor, HMGB1, was found to directly interact with and enhance the activity of APE1 and FEN1, and thus may aid in altering the structure of the nucleosome to be more accessible to BER factors. In this work, we investigated whether acetylation of Pol β, either alone or in conjunction with HMGB1, facilitates its activity on nucleosome substrates. We find acetylated Pol β exhibits enhanced strand displacement synthesis activity on DNA substrates, but, similar to the unmodified enzyme, has little or no activity on nucleosomes. Preincubation of DNA templates with HMGB1 has little or no stimulatory effect on Pol β and even is inhibitory at higher concentrations. In contrast, preincubation of nucleosomes with HMGB1 rescues Pol β gap-filling activity in nucleosomes, suggesting that this factor may help overcome the repressive effects of chromatin.

Emerging roles for histone modifications in DNA excision repair

DNA repair is critical to maintain genome stability. In eukaryotic cells, DNA repair is complicated by the packaging of the DNA 'substrate' into chromatin. DNA repair pathways utilize different mechanisms to overcome the barrier presented by chromatin to efficiently locate and remove DNA lesions in the genome. DNA excision repair pathways are responsible for repairing a majority of DNA lesions arising in the genome. Excision repair pathways include nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER), which repair bulky and non-bulky DNA lesions, respectively. Numerous studies have suggested that chromatin inhibits both NER and BER in vitro and in vivo Growing evidence demonstrates that histone modifications have important roles in regulating the activity of NER and BER enzymes in chromatin. Here, we will discuss the roles of different histone modifications and the corresponding modifying enzymes in DNA excision repair, highlighting the role of yeast as a model organism for many of these studies.