The low binding affinity of D-serine at the ionotropic glutamate receptor GluD2 can be attributed to the hinge region

Loss of activation by GABA in vertebrate delta ionotropic glutamate receptors

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) mediate excitatory signals between cells by binding neurotransmitters and conducting cations across the cell membrane. In the mammalian brain, most of these signals are mediated by two types of iGluRs: AMPA and NMDA (i.e. iGluRs sensitive to 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid, respectively). Delta-type iGluRs of mammals also form neurotransmitter-binding channels in the cell membrane, but in contrast, their channel is not activated by neurotransmitter binding, raising biophysical questions about iGluR activation and biological questions about the role of delta iGluRs. We therefore investigated the divergence of delta iGluRs from their iGluR cousins using molecular phylogenetics, electrophysiology, and site-directed mutagenesis. We find that delta iGluRs are found in numerous bilaterian animals (e.g., worms, starfish, and vertebrates) and are closely related to AMPA receptors, both genetically and functionally. Surprisingly, we observe that many iGluRs of the delta family are activated by the classical inhibitory neurotransmitter, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Finally, we identify nine amino acid substitutions that likely gave rise to the inactivity of today's mammalian delta iGluRs, and these mutations abolish activity when engineered into active invertebrate delta iGluRs, partly by inducing receptor desensitization. These results offer biophysical insight into iGluR activity and point to a role for GABA in excitatory signaling in invertebrates.

GluD1 binds GABA and controls inhibitory plasticity

Fast synaptic neurotransmission in the vertebrate central nervous system relies primarily on ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs), which drive neuronal excitation, and type A γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABAARs), which are responsible for neuronal inhibition. However, the GluD1 receptor, an iGluR family member, is present at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Whether and how GluD1 activation may affect inhibitory neurotransmission is unknown. In this work, by using a combination of biochemical, structural, and functional analyses, we demonstrate that GluD1 binds GABA, a previously unknown feature of iGluRs. GluD1 activation produces long-lasting enhancement of GABAergic synaptic currents in the adult mouse hippocampus through a non-ionotropic mechanism that is dependent on trans-synaptic anchoring. The identification of GluD1 as a GABA receptor that controls inhibitory synaptic plasticity challenges the classical dichotomy between glutamatergic and GABAergic receptors.

Differences between the GluD1 and GluD2 receptors revealed by GluD1 X-ray crystallography, binding studies and molecular dynamics

Ionotropic glutamate receptors are ligand-gated ion channels essential for fast excitatory neurotransmission in the brain. In contrast to most other members of the iGluR family, the subfamily of delta receptors, GluD1 and GluD2, does not bind glutamate but glycine/D-serine. GluD1 is widely expressed in the brain and the inner ear, where it is required for high-frequency hearing. Furthermore, it has been associated with schizophrenia, autism and depression. X-ray structures of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of GluD2 have been published; however, no high-resolution structure is available for the ligand-binding domain of GluD1 (GluD1-LBD). Here, we report the X-ray crystal structure of the GluD1-LBD in its apo form at 2.57 Å resolution. Using isothermal titration calorimetry, we show that D-serine binds to the GluD1-LBD in an exothermic manner with a K_d of 160 μm, which is approximately five-fold greater than at GluD2. Furthermore, we identify Glu822 as a critical determinant of receptor activation in GluD1 A654T. In contrast to studies on the GluD2 lurcher mutant A654T, we did not observe any effect of 1 mm D-serine on the spontaneous currents at mouse GluD1 A654T by electrophysiological recordings of Xenopus laevis oocytes as previously also reported by others. These results point towards differences in the structure and dynamics between GluD1 and GluD2. Molecular dynamics simulations were employed to address this observation, suggesting that the apo structure of GluD1 is less flexible than the apo structure of GluD2 and that Pro725 in GluD1 may affect the interlobe closure of the ligand-binding domain of GluD1.

GluD receptors are functional ion channels

In this article, we review contemporary evidence that GluD receptors are functional ion channels whose depolarizing currents contribute to their biological functions, akin to all other members of the ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) family.

Neuromechanobiology: An Expanding Field Driven by the Force of Greater Focus

The brain processes information by transmitting signals through highly connected and dynamic networks of neurons. Neurons use specific cellular structures, including axons, dendrites and synapses, and specific molecules, including cell adhesion molecules, ion channels and chemical receptors to form, maintain and communicate among cells in the networks. These cellular and molecular processes take place in environments rich of mechanical cues, thus offering ample opportunities for mechanical regulation of neural development and function. Recent studies have suggested the importance of mechanical cues and their potential regulatory roles in the development and maintenance of these neuronal structures. Also suggested are the importance of mechanical cues and their potential regulatory roles in the interaction and function of molecules mediating the interneuronal communications. In this review, the current understanding is integrated and promising future directions of neuromechanobiology are suggested at the cellular and molecular levels. Several neuronal processes where mechanics likely plays a role are examined and how forces affect ligand binding, conformational change, and signal induction of molecules key to these neuronal processes are indicated, especially at the synapse. The disease relevance of neuromechanobiology as well as therapies and engineering solutions to neurological disorders stemmed from this emergent field of study are also discussed.

Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels

Many physiologic effects of l-glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system, are mediated via signaling by ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs). These ligand-gated ion channels are critical to brain function and are centrally implicated in numerous psychiatric and neurologic disorders. There are different classes of iGluRs with a variety of receptor subtypes in each class that play distinct roles in neuronal functions. The diversity in iGluR subtypes, with their unique functional properties and physiologic roles, has motivated a large number of studies. Our understanding of receptor subtypes has advanced considerably since the first iGluR subunit gene was cloned in 1989, and the research focus has expanded to encompass facets of biology that have been recently discovered and to exploit experimental paradigms made possible by technological advances. Here, we review insights from more than 3 decades of iGluR studies with an emphasis on the progress that has occurred in the past decade. We cover structure, function, pharmacology, roles in neurophysiology, and therapeutic implications for all classes of receptors assembled from the subunits encoded by the 18 ionotropic glutamate receptor genes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Glutamate receptors play important roles in virtually all aspects of brain function and are either involved in mediating some clinical features of neurological disease or represent a therapeutic target for treatment. Therefore, understanding the structure, function, and pharmacology of this class of receptors will advance our understanding of many aspects of brain function at molecular, cellular, and system levels and provide new opportunities to treat patients.

Structural biology of ionotropic glutamate delta receptors and their crosstalk with metabotropic glutamate receptors

Enigmatic orphan glutamate delta receptors (GluD) are one of the four classes of the ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) that play key roles in synaptic transmission and plasticity. While members of other iGluR families viz AMPA, NMDA, and kainate receptors are gated by glutamate, the GluD receptors neither bind glutamate nor evoke ligand-induced currents upon binding of glycine and D-serine. Thus, the GluD receptors were considered to function as structural proteins that facilitate the formation, maturation, and maintenance of synapses in the hippocampus and cerebellum. Recent work has revealed that GluD receptors have extensive crosstalk with metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGlus) and are also gated by their activation. The latest development of a novel optopharamcological tool and the cryoEM structures of GluD receptors would help define the molecular and chemical basis of the GluD receptor's role in synaptic physiology. This article is part of the special Issue on "Glutamate Receptors - Orphan iGluRs".

Glycine agonism in ionotropic glutamate receptors

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate the majority of excitatory neurotransmission in the vertebrate CNS. Classified as AMPA, kainate, delta and NMDA receptors, iGluRs are central drivers of synaptic plasticity widely considered as a major cellular substrate of learning and memory. Surprisingly however, five out of the eighteen vertebrate iGluR subunits do not bind glutamate but glycine, a neurotransmitter known to mediate inhibitory neurotransmission through its action on pentameric glycine receptors (GlyRs). This is the case of GluN1, GluN3A, GluN3B, GluD1 and GluD2 subunits, all also binding the D amino acid d-serine endogenously present in many brain regions. Glycine and d-serine action and affinities broadly differ between glycinergic iGluR subtypes. On 'conventional' GluN1/GluN2 NMDA receptors, glycine (or d-serine) acts in concert with glutamate as a mandatory co-agonist to set the level of receptor activity. It also regulates the receptor's trafficking and expression independently of glutamate. On 'unconventional' GluN1/GluN3 NMDARs, glycine acts as the sole agonist directly triggering opening of excitatory glycinergic channels recently shown to be physiologically relevant. On GluD receptors, d-serine on its own mediates non-ionotropic signaling involved in excitatory and inhibitory synaptogenesis, further reinforcing the concept of glutamate-insensitive iGluRs. Here we present an overview of our current knowledge on glycine and d-serine agonism in iGluRs emphasizing aspects related to molecular mechanisms, cellular function and pharmacological profile. The growing appreciation of the critical influence of glycine and d-serine on iGluR biology reshapes our understanding of iGluR signaling diversity and complexity, with important implications in neuropharmacology.

Structural biology and thermodynamics of GluD receptors

Glutamate delta (GluD) receptors are a functionally enigmatic subfamily of ionotropic glutamate receptors. Despite sharing similar sequences and structures with AMPA, NMDA, and kainate receptors, GluD receptors do not bind glutamate nor function as ligand-gated ion channels. Binding d-serine and engaging in transsynaptic protein-protein interactions, GluD receptors are thought to undergo complex conformational rearrangements for non-ionotropic signaling that regulates synaptic plasticity. Recent structural, biochemical, and computational studies have elucidated multiple conformational and thermodynamic factors governing the unique properties of GluD receptors. Here, we review advances in biophysical insights into GluD receptors and discuss the structural thermodynamic relationships that underpin their neurobiological functions.

D-Serine Potently Drives Ligand-Binding Domain Closure in the Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor GluD2

Despite their classification as ionotropic glutamate receptors, GluD receptors are not functional ligand-gated ion channels and do not bind glutamate. GluD2 receptors bind D-serine and coordinate transsynaptic complexes that regulate synaptic plasticity. Instead of opening the ion channel pore, mechanical tension produced from closure of GluD2 ligand-binding domains (LBDs) drives conformational rearrangements for non-ionotropic signaling. We report computed conformational free energy landscapes for the GluD2 LBD in apo and D-serine-bound states. Unexpectedly, the conformational free energy associated with GluD2 LBD closure upon D-serine binding is greater than that for AMPA, NMDA, and kainate receptor LBDs upon agonist binding. This excludes insufficient force generation as an explanation for lack of ion channel activity in GluD2 receptors and suggests that non-ionotropic conformational rearrangements do more work than pore opening. We also report free energy landscapes for GluD2 LBD harboring a neurodegenerative mutation and demonstrate selective stabilization of closed conformations in the apo state.

The structural bases for agonist diversity in an Arabidopsis thaliana glutamate receptor-like channel

Arabidopsis thaliana glutamate receptor-like (GLR) channels are amino acid-gated ion channels involved in physiological processes including wound signaling, stomatal regulation, and pollen tube growth. Here, fluorescence microscopy and genetics were used to confirm the central role of GLR3.3 in the amino acid-elicited cytosolic Ca²⁺ increase in Arabidopsis seedling roots. To elucidate the binding properties of the receptor, we biochemically reconstituted the GLR3.3 ligand-binding domain (LBD) and analyzed its selectivity profile; our binding experiments revealed the LBD preference for l-Glu but also for sulfur-containing amino acids. Furthermore, we solved the crystal structures of the GLR3.3 LBD in complex with 4 different amino acid ligands, providing a rationale for how the LBD binding site evolved to accommodate diverse amino acids, thus laying the grounds for rational mutagenesis. Last, we inspected the structures of LBDs from nonplant species and generated homology models for other GLR isoforms. Our results establish that GLR3.3 is a receptor endowed with a unique amino acid ligand profile and provide a structural framework for engineering this and other GLR isoforms to investigate their physiology.

The plastic d-serine signaling pathway: Sliding from neurons to glia and vice-versa

d-Serine is now recognized as the main co-agonist for NMDA receptors. For years it was thought to be exclusively produced by astrocytes and was thus viewed as the archetype of gliotransmitters. Recent research have challenged this long cherished and appealing view by showing that in physiological conditions d-erine would rather originate from neurons but not from glia. In the present review and in the light of the emerging serine shuttle model, we ambition to offer a new reading direction of the glia-neuron cross-talk in shaping the metabolism and the functions of d-serine in cerebral communication in normal and pathological conditions by re-interpretating some seminal findings.

The Challenge of Interpreting Glutamate-Receptor Ion-Channel Structures

Ion channels activated by glutamate mediate excitatory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. Similar to other ligand-gated ion channels, their gating cycle begins with transitions from a ligand-free closed state to glutamate-bound active and desensitized states. In an attempt to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying gating, numerous structures for glutamate receptors have been solved in complexes with agonists, antagonists, allosteric modulators, and auxiliary proteins. The embarrassingly rich library of structures emerging from this work reveals very dynamic molecules with a more complex conformational spectrum than anticipated from functional studies. Unanticipated conformations solved for complexes with competitive antagonists and a lack of understanding of the structural basis for ion channel subconductance states further highlight challenges that have yet to be addressed.