Transient Absorption of Chlorophylls and Carotenoids after Two-Photon Excitation of LHCII

Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy following two-photon excitation (2PE) is used to determine the contributions of carotenoids and chlorophylls to the 2PE signals in the main plant light-harvesting complex (LHCII). For 2PE, excitation at 1210 and 1300 nm was used, being within the known 2PE profile of LHCII. At both excitation wavelengths, the transient absorption spectra exhibit a shape characteristic of excited chlorophylls with only a minor contribution from carotenoids. We compare the 2PE data measured for LHCII with those obtained from 2PE of a lutein/chlorophyll a mixture in acetone. We estimate that although the 2PE cross section of a single carotenoid in acetone is ∼1.7 times larger than that of a Chl a, due to the 1:3.5 carotenoid/Chl ratio in LHCII, only one-third of the absorbed 2PE photons excite carotenoids in LHCII in the 1200-1300 nm range.

Two-photon absorption and excitation spectroscopy of carotenoids, chlorophylls and pigment-protein complexes

In addition to (bacterio)chlorophylls, (B)Chls, photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes bind carotenoids (Cars) that fulfil various important functions which are not fully understood, yet. However, certain excited states of Cars are optically one-photon forbidden ("dark") and can potentially undergo excitation energy transfer (EET) to (B)Chls following two-photon absorption (TPA). The amount of EET is reflected by the differences in TPA and two-photon excitation (TPE) spectra of a complex (multi-pigment) system. Since it is technically and analytically demanding to resolve optically forbidden states, different studies reported varying contributions of Cars and Chls to TPE/TPA spectra. In a study using well-defined 1 : 1 Car-tetrapyrrole dyads TPE contributions of tetrapyrrole molecules, including Chls, and Cars were measured. In these experiments, TPE of Cars dominated over Chl a TPE in a broad wavelength range. Another study suggested only minor contributions of Cars to TPE spectra of pigment-protein complexes such as the plant main light-harvesting complex (LHCII), in particular for wavelengths longer than ∼600/1200 nm. By joining forces and a combined analysis of all available data by both teams, we try to resolve this apparent contradiction. Here, we demonstrate that reconstruction of a wide spectral range of TPE for LHCII and photosystem I (PSI) requires both, significant Car and Chl contributions. Direct comparison of TPE spectra obtained in both studies demonstrates a good agreement of the primary data. We conclude that in TPE spectra of LHCII and PSI, the contribution of Chls is dominating above 600/1200 nm, whereas the contributions of forbidden Car states increase particularly at wavelengths shorter than 600/1200 nm. Estimates of Car contributions to TPA as well as TPE spectra are given for various wavelengths.

Excitation quenching in chlorophyll-carotenoid antenna systems: 'coherent' or 'incoherent'

Plants possess an essential ability to rapidly down-regulate light-harvesting in response to high light. This photoprotective process involves the formation of energy-quenching interactions between the chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments within the antenna of Photosystem II (PSII). The nature of these interactions is currently debated, with, among others, 'incoherent' or 'coherent' quenching models (or a combination of the two) suggested by a range of time-resolved spectroscopic measurements. In 'incoherent quenching', energy is transferred from a chlorophyll to a carotenoid and is dissipated due to the intrinsically short excitation lifetime of the latter. 'Coherent quenching' would arise from the quantum mechanical mixing of chlorophyll and carotenoid excited state properties, leading to a reduction in chlorophyll excitation lifetime. The key parameters are the energy gap, [Formula: see text] and the resonance coupling, J, between the two excited states. Coherent quenching will be the dominant process when [Formula: see text] i.e., when the two molecules are resonant, while the quenching will be largely incoherent when [Formula: see text] One would expect quenching to be energetically unfavorable for [Formula: see text] The actual dynamics of quenching lie somewhere between these limiting regimes and have non-trivial dependencies of both J and [Formula: see text] Using the Hierarchical Equation of Motion (HEOM) formalism we present a detailed theoretical examination of these excitation dynamics and their dependence on slow variations in J and [Formula: see text] We first consider an isolated chlorophyll-carotenoid dimer before embedding it within a PSII antenna sub-unit (LHCII). We show that neither energy transfer, nor the mixing of excited state lifetimes represent unique or necessary pathways for quenching and in fact discussing them as distinct quenching mechanisms is misleading. However, we do show that quenching cannot be switched 'on' and 'off' by fine tuning of [Formula: see text] around the resonance point, [Formula: see text] Due to the large reorganization energy of the carotenoid excited state, we find that the presence (or absence) of coherent interactions have almost no impact of the dynamics of quenching. Counter-intuitively significant quenching is present even when the carotenoid excited state lies above that of the chlorophyll. We also show that, above a rather small threshold value of [Formula: see text]quenching becomes less and less sensitive to J (since in the window [Formula: see text] the overall lifetime is independent of it). The requirement for quenching appear to be only that [Formula: see text] Although the coherent/incoherent character of the quenching can vary, the overall kinetics are likely robust with respect to fluctuations in J and [Formula: see text] This may be the basis for previous observations of NPQ with both coherent and incoherent features.

How carotenoid distortions may determine optical properties: lessons from the Orange Carotenoid Protein

Carotenoids in photosynthetic proteins carry out the dual function of harvesting light and defending against photo-damage by quenching excess energy. The latter involves the low-lying, dark, excited state labelled S1. Here "dark" means optically-forbidden, a property that is often attributed to molecular symmetry, which leads to speculation that its optical properties may be strongly-perturbed by structural distortions. This has been both explicitly and implicitly proposed as an important feature of photo-protective energy quenching. Here we present a theoretical analysis of the relationship between structural distortions and S1 optical properties. We outline how S1 is dark not because of overall geometric symmetry but because of a topological symmetry related to bond length alternation in the conjugated backbone. Taking the carotenoid echinenone as an example and using a combination of molecular dynamics, quantum chemistry, and the theory of spectral lineshapes, we show that distortions that break this symmetry are extremely stiff. They are therefore absent in solution and only marginally present in even a very highly-distorted protein binding pocket such as in the Orange Carotenoid Protein (OCP). S1 remains resolutely optically-forbidden despite any breaking of bulk molecular symmetry by the protein environment. However, rotations of partially conjugated end-rings can result in fine tuning of the S1 transition density which may exert some influence on interactions with neighbouring chromophores.