Environmental Applications of Electromembrane Extraction: A Review

Electromembrane extraction (EME) is a miniaturized extraction technique that has been widely used in recent years for the analysis and removal of pollutants in the environment. It is based on electrokinetic migration across a supported liquid membrane (SLM) under the influence of an external electrical field between two aqueous compartments. Based on the features of the SLM and the electrical field, EME offers quick extraction, effective sample clean-up, and good selectivity, and limits the amount of organic solvent used per sample to a few microliters. In this paper, the basic devices (membrane materials and types of organic solvents) and influencing factors of EME are first introduced, and the applications of EME in the analysis and removal of environmental inorganic ions and organic pollutants are systematically reviewed. An outlook on the future development of EME for environmental applications is also given.

Biosynthesized silver nanoparticle-coated electro-membrane extraction of perchlorate in different seafood samples

In this work we developed a rapid and straightforward technique in which biosynthesized silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) were coated on a porous membrane utilizing electrical potential to extract perchlorate from seafood samples. The biosynthesized Ag-NPs were well characterized using UV-Vis. spectrophotometry, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. After extraction, analyses were performed using ion chromatography. The Ag-NP-coated porous polypropylene membrane shows higher extraction efficiency due to the high electrical conductivity of the Ag-NPs. The performance of this efficient technique was compared with those previously reported in the literature. The extraction variables that affect extraction of the target analyte and influence percentage recovery, such as pH of the sample solution, extraction time, and applied voltage, were investigated and optimized. The results demonstrated optimum conditions to achieve low detection limits [LODs (limits of detection)]: sample solution (pH = 6), short extraction time (10 min), and applied voltage (5 V). The developed method shows excellent linearity for perchlorate ion in the range from 0.001 to 350 μg L^-1 with a coefficient of determination (r² ) of 0.9991. The detection limit (LODs) and quantification limits (limits of quantification) were found to be 0.04 and 0.1225 μg kg^-1 , respectively. The mean recovery percentages for three replicates of 10 different spiked fish samples by 3 μg g^-1 of perchlorate were between 92.2 and 106.2%, with an observed relative standard deviation in the range of 0.8-3.7%. The proposed method is rapid, sensitive, inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and highly effective in extracting perchlorate from different seafood samples.

Electromembrane extraction of peptides using deep eutectic solvents as liquid membrane

For the first time, we report electromembrane extraction (EME) of peptides using deep eutectic solvent (DES) as supported liquid membrane (SLM). DES were mixtures of coumarin, camphor, DL-menthol and thymol. Sixteen model peptides were extracted from 100 μL 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH 3.0), through the SLM, and into 100 μL acceptor solution consisting of 50 mM phosphoric acid (pH 1.8). EME was performed in 96-well format with 30 V to facilitate extraction of positively charged peptides. The model peptides comprised three to 13 amino acids, and differed significantly in terms of acid/base functionalities and polarity. We found pure DES to be inefficient for EME of peptides. However, with addition of a small amount of the ionic carrier di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (DEHP) to the DES, the extraction efficiency increased due to ionic interactions. With the most efficient SLM; coumarin and thymol mixed in molar ratio (1:2) with 2.0% (v/v) DEHP, average recovery after 15 min was 55%; five peptides were extracted with recovery > 80%, nine peptides with recoveries in the range 40-80%, and two peptides were not extracted (recovery < 5%). When extraction time was extended to 45 min, average extraction recovery increased to 83%. Extraction recoveries with DES were higher than previously reported in the literature for the same model peptides.