1
|
Yin D, Zhao B, Wang S, Donahue NM, Feng B, Chang X, Chen Q, Cheng X, Liu T, Chan CK, Schervish M, Li Z, He Y, Hao J. Fostering a Holistic Understanding of the Full Volatility Spectrum of Organic Compounds from Benzene Series Precursors through Mechanistic Modeling. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:8380-8392. [PMID: 38691504 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
A comprehensive understanding of the full volatility spectrum of organic oxidation products from the benzene series precursors is important to quantify the air quality and climate effects of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and new particle formation (NPF). However, current models fail to capture the full volatility spectrum due to the absence of important reaction pathways. Here, we develop a novel unified model framework, the integrated two-dimensional volatility basis set (I2D-VBS), to simulate the full volatility spectrum of products from benzene series precursors by simultaneously representing first-generational oxidation, multigenerational aging, autoxidation, dimerization, nitrate formation, etc. The model successfully reproduces the volatility and O/C distributions of oxygenated organic molecules (OOMs) as well as the concentrations and the O/C of SOA over wide-ranging experimental conditions. In typical urban environments, autoxidation and multigenerational oxidation are the two main pathways for the formation of OOMs and SOA with similar contributions, but autoxidation contributes more to low-volatility products. NOx can reduce about two-thirds of OOMs and SOA, and most of the extremely low-volatility products compared to clean conditions, by suppressing dimerization and autoxidation. The I2D-VBS facilitates a holistic understanding of full volatility product formation, which helps fill the large gap in the predictions of organic NPF, particle growth, and SOA formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejia Yin
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Bin Zhao
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Shuxiao Wang
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Neil M Donahue
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Boyang Feng
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Xing Chang
- Laboratory of Transport Pollution Control and Monitoring Technology, Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China
| | - Qi Chen
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, BIC-ESAT and IJRC, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, BIC-ESAT and IJRC, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tengyu Liu
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
| | - Chak K Chan
- Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Meredith Schervish
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Zeqi Li
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yicong He
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Jiming Hao
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Z, Zhao B, Yin D, Wang S, Qiao X, Jiang J, Li Y, Shen J, He Y, Chang X, Li X, Liu Y, Li Y, Liu C, Qi X, Chen L, Chi X, Jiang Y, Li Y, Wu J, Nie W, Ding A. Modeling the Formation of Organic Compounds across Full Volatility Ranges and Their Contribution to Nanoparticle Growth in a Polluted Atmosphere. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:1223-1235. [PMID: 38117938 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Nanoparticle growth influences atmospheric particles' climatic effects, and it is largely driven by low-volatility organic vapors. However, the magnitude and mechanism of organics' contribution to nanoparticle growth in polluted environments remain unclear because current observations and models cannot capture organics across full volatility ranges or track their formation chemistry. Here, we develop a mechanistic model that characterizes the full volatility spectrum of organic vapors and their contributions to nanoparticle growth by coupling advanced organic oxidation modeling and kinetic gas-particle partitioning. The model is applied to Nanjing, a typical polluted city, and it effectively captures the volatility distribution of low-volatility organics (with saturation vapor concentrations <0.3 μg/m3), thus accurately reproducing growth rates (GRs), with a 4.91% normalized mean bias. Simulations indicate that as particles grow from 4 to 40 nm, the relative fractions of GRs attributable to organics increase from 59 to 86%, with the remaining contribution from H2SO4 and its clusters. Aromatics contribute much to condensable organic vapors (∼37%), especially low-volatility vapors (∼61%), thus contributing the most to GRs (32-46%) as 4-40 nm particles grow. Alkanes also contribute 19-35% of GRs, while biogenic volatile organic compounds contribute minimally (<13%). Our model helps assess the climatic impacts of particles and predict future changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeqi Li
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Bin Zhao
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Dejia Yin
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Shuxiao Wang
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Xiaohui Qiao
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Jingkun Jiang
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yiran Li
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Jiewen Shen
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yicong He
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Xing Chang
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
- Laboratory of Transport Pollution Control and Monitoring Technology, Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Li
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yuliang Liu
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Yuanyuan Li
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chong Liu
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ximeng Qi
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Liangduo Chen
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Xuguang Chi
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Yueqi Jiang
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yuyang Li
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Jin Wu
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Wei Nie
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Aijun Ding
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
- National Observation and Research Station for Atmospheric Processes and Environmental Change in Yangtze River Delta, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sasidharan S, He Y, Akherati A, Li Q, Li W, Cocker D, McDonald BC, Coggon MM, Seltzer KM, Pye HOT, Pierce JR, Jathar SH. Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Volatile Chemical Product Emissions: Model Parameters and Contributions to Anthropogenic Aerosol. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2023; 57:11891-11902. [PMID: 37527511 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Volatile chemical products (VCP) are an increasingly important source of hydrocarbon and oxygenated volatile organic compound (OVOC) emissions to the atmosphere, and these emissions are likely to play an important role as anthropogenic precursors for secondary organic aerosol (SOA). While the SOA from VCP hydrocarbons is often accounted for in models, the formation, evolution, and properties of SOA from VCP OVOCs remain uncertain. We use environmental chamber data and a kinetic model to develop SOA parameters for 10 OVOCs representing glycols, glycol ethers, esters, oxygenated aromatics, and amines. Model simulations suggest that the SOA mass yields for these OVOCs are of the same magnitude as widely studied SOA precursors (e.g., long-chain alkanes, monoterpenes, and single-ring aromatics), and these yields exhibit a linear correlation with the carbon number of the precursor. When combined with emissions inventories for two megacities in the United States (US) and a US-wide inventory, we find that VCP VOCs react with OH to form 0.8-2.5× as much SOA, by mass, as mobile sources. Hydrocarbons (terpenes, branched and cyclic alkanes) and OVOCs (terpenoids, glycols, glycol ethers) make up 60-75 and 25-40% of the SOA arising from VCP use, respectively. This work contributes to the growing body of knowledge focused on studying VCP VOC contributions to urban air pollution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreejith Sasidharan
- Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Yicong He
- Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Ali Akherati
- Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Qi Li
- Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, United States
| | - Weihua Li
- Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, United States
| | - David Cocker
- Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, United States
| | - Brian C McDonald
- Chemical Sciences Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Matthew M Coggon
- Chemical Sciences Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Karl M Seltzer
- Office of Air and Radiation, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - Havala O T Pye
- Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Pierce
- Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, United States
| | - Shantanu H Jathar
- Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abernathy SM, Berry MO, Anderson AJ. Calculating the Enthalpy of Vaporization of Ethanol, n-Heptane, Isooctane, and a Binary Mixture of Isooctane + n-Heptane from Their Vapor Pressure Data. Acc Chem Res 2023. [PMID: 36913605 DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
ConspectusA key physical property of volatile liquids is vapor pressure (VP). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a classification of compounds directly associated with low boiling points, high rates of evaporation, and high flammability. The majority of chemists and chemical engineers were directly exposed to the odor of simple ethers, acetone, and toluene in the air while taking an organic chemistry laboratory course as an undergraduate student. These are just a few examples of the numerous VOCs produced by the chemical industry. When toluene is poured into a beaker from its reagent bottle, its vapors readily evaporate at ambient temperature from this open container. When the cap is securely placed back on the reagent bottle of toluene, a dynamic equilibrium develops and exists in this closed environment. This chemical concept is known as a vapor-liquid phase equilibrium. A crucial physical property of spark-ignition (SI) fuels is high volatility. In the United States, most of the vehicles traveling on the road today have SI engines. Gasoline is the fuel used to power these engines. It is a major product manufactured by the petroleum industry. This fuel is petroleum based since it is a refined product of crude oil consisting of a mixture of hydrocarbons, additives, and blending agents. Thus, gasoline is homogeneous solution of VOCs.The VP as a function of temperature of a pure VOC can readily be measured using an ebulliometer. The VP is also known in the literature as the "bubble point pressure". In this investigation, the VP as a function of temperature was acquired for the VOCs ethanol, isooctane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane), and n-heptane. The latter two VOCs are primary reference fuels components found in 87, 89, and 92 grade gasoline. Ethanol is an oxygenate additive of gasoline. The VP of a homogeneous binary mixture of isooctane and n-heptane was also acquired using the same ebulliometer and methodology. In our work, an enhanced ebulliometer was used to collect the VP data in our work. It is known as the vapor pressure acquisition system. The devices that comprise the system automatically acquire the VP data and log it into an excel spreadsheet. The data are readily transformed into information to compute the heat of vaporization (ΔHvap). The results described in this Account compare quite favorably to the literature values. This validates our system for performing fast and reliable VP measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn M Abernathy
- Department of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20059, United States
| | - Malachi O Berry
- Department of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20059, United States
| | - Alan J Anderson
- Department of Natural Sciences, Bowie State University, 14000 Jericho Road, Bowie, Maryland 20715, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bilsback KR, He Y, Cappa CD, Chang RYW, Croft B, Martin RV, Ng NL, Seinfeld JH, Pierce JR, Jathar SH. Vapors Are Lost to Walls, Not to Particles on the Wall: Artifact-Corrected Parameters from Chamber Experiments and Implications for Global Secondary Organic Aerosol. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2023; 57:53-63. [PMID: 36563184 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Atmospheric models of secondary organic aerosol (OA) (SOA) typically rely on parameters derived from environmental chambers. Chambers are subject to experimental artifacts, including losses of (1) particles to the walls (PWL), (2) vapors to the particles on the wall (V2PWL), and (3) vapors to the wall directly (VWL). We present a method for deriving artifact-corrected SOA parameters and translating these to volatility basis set (VBS) parameters for use in chemical transport models (CTMs). Our process involves combining a box model that accounts for chamber artifacts (Statistical Oxidation Model with a TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional model (SOM-TOMAS)) with a pseudo-atmospheric simulation to develop VBS parameters that are fit across a range of OA mass concentrations. We found that VWL led to the highest percentage change in chamber SOA mass yields (high NOx: 36-680%; low NOx: 55-250%), followed by PWL (high NOx: 8-39%; low NOx: 10-37%), while the effects of V2PWL are negligible. In contrast to earlier work that assumed that V2PWL was a meaningful loss pathway, we show that V2PWL is an unimportant SOA loss pathway and can be ignored when analyzing chamber data. Using our updated VBS parameters, we found that not accounting for VWL may lead surface-level OA to be underestimated by 24% (0.25 μg m-3) as a global average or up to 130% (9.0 μg m-3) in regions of high biogenic or anthropogenic activity. Finally, we found that accurately accounting for PWL and VWL improves model-measurement agreement for fine mode aerosol mass concentrations (PM2.5) in the GEOS-Chem model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey R Bilsback
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado80523, United States
- PSE Healthy Energy, Oakland, California94612, United States
| | - Yicong He
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado80523, United States
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, China
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing100084, China
| | - Christopher D Cappa
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, California95616, United States
| | - Rachel Ying-Wen Chang
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova ScotiaB3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Betty Croft
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova ScotiaB3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Randall V Martin
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova ScotiaB3H 4R2, Canada
- Department of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri63130, United States
| | - Nga Lee Ng
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia30332, United States
- School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia30332, United States
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia30332, United States
| | - John H Seinfeld
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California91125, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Pierce
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado80523, United States
| | - Shantanu H Jathar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado80523, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
He Y, Lambe AT, Seinfeld JH, Cappa CD, Pierce JR, Jathar SH. Process-Level Modeling Can Simultaneously Explain Secondary Organic Aerosol Evolution in Chambers and Flow Reactors. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2022; 56:6262-6273. [PMID: 35504037 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) data gathered in environmental chambers (ECs) have been used extensively to develop parameters to represent SOA formation and evolution. The EC-based parameters are usually constrained to less than one day of photochemical aging but extrapolated to predict SOA aging over much longer timescales in atmospheric models. Recently, SOA has been increasingly studied in oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) over aging timescales of one to multiple days. However, these OFR data have been rarely used to validate or update the EC-based parameters. The simultaneous use of EC and OFR data is challenging because the processes relevant to SOA formation and evolution proceed over very different timescales, and both reactor types exhibit distinct experimental artifacts. In this work, we show that a kinetic SOA chemistry and microphysics model that accounts for various processes, including wall losses, aerosol phase state, heterogeneous oxidation, oligomerization, and new particle formation, can simultaneously explain SOA evolution in EC and OFR experiments, using a single consistent set of SOA parameters. With α-pinene as an example, we first developed parameters by fitting the model output to the measured SOA mass concentration and oxygen-to-carbon (O:C) ratio from an EC experiment (<1 day of aging). We then used these parameters to simulate SOA formation in OFR experiments and found that the model overestimated SOA formation (by a factor of 3-16) over photochemical ages ranging from 0.4 to 13 days, when excluding the abovementioned processes. By comprehensively accounting for these processes, the model was able to explain the observed evolution in SOA mass, composition (i.e., O:C), and size distribution in the OFR experiments. This work suggests that EC and OFR SOA data can be modeled consistently, and a synergistic use of EC and OFR data can aid in developing more refined SOA parameters for use in atmospheric models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yicong He
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Andrew T Lambe
- Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| | - John H Seinfeld
- Divison of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| | - Christopher D Cappa
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Pierce
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, United States
| | - Shantanu H Jathar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garofalo LA, He Y, Jathar SH, Pierce JR, Fredrickson CD, Palm BB, Thornton JA, Mahrt F, Crescenzo GV, Bertram AK, Draper DC, Fry JL, Orlando J, Zhang X, Farmer DK. Heterogeneous Nucleation Drives Particle Size Segregation in Sequential Ozone and Nitrate Radical Oxidation of Catechol. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2021; 55:15637-15645. [PMID: 34813317 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Secondary organic aerosol formation via condensation of organic vapors onto existing aerosol transforms the chemical composition and size distribution of ambient aerosol, with implications for air quality and Earth's radiative balance. Gas-to-particle conversion is generally thought to occur on a continuum between equilibrium-driven partitioning of semivolatile molecules to the pre-existing mass size distribution and kinetic-driven condensation of low volatility molecules to the pre-existing surface area size distribution. However, we offer experimental evidence in contrast to this framework. When catechol is sequentially oxidized by O3 and NO3 in the presence of (NH4)2SO4 seed particles with a single size mode, we observe a bimodal organic aerosol mass size distribution with two size modes of distinct chemical composition with nitrocatechol from NO3 oxidation preferentially condensing onto the large end of the pre-existing size distribution (∼750 nm). A size-resolved chemistry and microphysics model reproduces the evolution of the two distinct organic aerosol size modes─heterogeneous nucleation to an independent, nitrocatechol-rich aerosol phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Garofalo
- Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Yicong He
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Shantanu H Jathar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Pierce
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Carley D Fredrickson
- Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
| | - Brett B Palm
- Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
| | - Joel A Thornton
- Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
| | - Fabian Mahrt
- Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe V Crescenzo
- Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Allan K Bertram
- Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Danielle C Draper
- Department of Chemistry, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202, United States
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| | - Juliane L Fry
- Department of Chemistry, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202, United States
| | - John Orlando
- National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, United States
| | - Xuan Zhang
- National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, United States
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Merced, California 95343, United States
| | - Delphine K Farmer
- Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
An accelerating global energy demand, paired with the harmful environmental effects of fossil fuels, has triggered the search for alternative, renewable energy sources. Biofuels are arguably a potential renewable energy source in the transportation industry as they can be used within current infrastructures and require less technological advances than other renewable alternatives, such as electric vehicles and nuclear power. The literature suggests biofuels can negatively impact food security and production; however, this is dependent on the type of feedstock used in biofuel production. Advanced biofuels, derived from inedible biomass, are heavily favoured but require further research and development to reach their full commercial potential. Replacing fossil fuels by biofuels can substantially reduce particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, but simultaneously increase emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), acetaldehyde (CH3CHO) and peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), resulting in debates concerning the way biofuels should be implemented. The potential biofuel blends (FT-SPK, HEFA-SPK, ATJ-SPK and HFS-SIP) and their use as an alternative to kerosene-type fuels in the aviation industry have also been assessed. Although these fuels are currently more costly than conventional aviation fuels, possible reduction in production costs has been reported as a potential solution. A preliminary study shows that i-butanol emissions (1.8 Tg/year) as a biofuel can increase ozone levels by up to 6% in the upper troposphere, highlighting a potential climate impact. However, a larger number of studies will be needed to assess the practicalities and associated cost of using the biofuel in existing vehicles, particularly in terms of identifying any modifications to existing engine infrastructure, the impact of biofuel emissions, and their chemistry on the climate and human health, to fully determine their suitability as a potential renewable energy source.
Collapse
|
9
|
He Y, Akherati A, Nah T, Ng NL, Garofalo LA, Farmer DK, Shiraiwa M, Zaveri RA, Cappa CD, Pierce JR, Jathar SH. Particle Size Distribution Dynamics Can Help Constrain the Phase State of Secondary Organic Aerosol. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2021; 55:1466-1476. [PMID: 33417446 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Particle phase state is a property of atmospheric aerosols that has important implications for the formation, evolution, and gas/particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol (SOA). In this work, we use a size-resolved chemistry and microphysics model (Statistical Oxidation Model coupled to the TwO Moment Aerosol Sectional (SOM-TOMAS)), updated to include an explicit treatment of particle phase state, to constrain the bulk diffusion coefficient (Db) of SOA produced from α-pinene ozonolysis. By leveraging data from laboratory experiments performed in the absence of a seed and under dry conditions, we find that the Db for SOA can be constrained ((1-7) × 10-15 cm2 s-1 in these experiments) by simultaneously reproducing the time-varying SOA mass concentrations and the evolution of the particle size distribution. Another version of our model that used the predicted SOA composition to calculate the glass-transition temperature, viscosity, and, ultimately, Db (∼10-15 cm2 s-1) of the SOA was able to reproduce the mass and size distribution measurements when we included oligomer formation (oligomers accounted for about a fifth of the SOA mass). Our work highlights the potential of a size-resolved SOA model to constrain the particle phase state of SOA using historical measurements of the evolution of the particle size distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yicong He
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Ali Akherati
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Theodora Nah
- School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Nga L Ng
- School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
| | - Lauren A Garofalo
- Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Delphine K Farmer
- Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Manabu Shiraiwa
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Rahul A Zaveri
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States
| | - Christopher D Cappa
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Pierce
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Shantanu H Jathar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Krechmer JE, Day DA, Jimenez JL. Always Lost but Never Forgotten: Gas-Phase Wall Losses Are Important in All Teflon Environmental Chambers. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2020; 54:12890-12897. [PMID: 32930585 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Yields of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from oxidation of volatile organic compounds are measured in laboratory chambers and then applied in regional and global models. Gas-phase losses to large Teflon-walled environmental chambers have been recently shown to reduce SOA yields. Historically, most chambers have operated in batch mode. Increasingly, however, continuous flow (CF) mode is being used, in which reactants and products are continuously introduced and exhausted from the chamber. Recent literature reports indicate a belief that SOA yields measured in CF chambers are not affected by gas-phase wall losses (GWL). Here, we use an experimentally-constrained box model to show that gas-phase wall losses impact both types of chambers when run under similar conditions. We find CF experiments do mitigate some effects of gas-phase wall losses after long (>2 days) experiment run times, but they have significant losses for typical literature experiment times of 1 day. However, this mitigation phenomenon is an experiment- and mechanism-dependent, and GWL still affects the absolute SOA yield. Finally, we show that at condensation sink values higher than the wall loss rate a lack of change in yield vs seed surface area does not necessarily indicate whether GWL affects the experiment and does not suggest the magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan E Krechmer
- Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| | - Douglas A Day
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) and Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
| | - Jose L Jimenez
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) and Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akherati A, He Y, Coggon MM, Koss AR, Hodshire AL, Sekimoto K, Warneke C, de Gouw J, Yee L, Seinfeld JH, Onasch TB, Herndon SC, Knighton WB, Cappa CD, Kleeman MJ, Lim CY, Kroll JH, Pierce JR, Jathar SH. Oxygenated Aromatic Compounds are Important Precursors of Secondary Organic Aerosol in Biomass-Burning Emissions. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2020; 54:8568-8579. [PMID: 32559089 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Biomass burning is the largest combustion-related source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to the atmosphere. We describe the development of a state-of-the-science model to simulate the photochemical formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from biomass-burning emissions observed in dry (RH <20%) environmental chamber experiments. The modeling is supported by (i) new oxidation chamber measurements, (ii) detailed concurrent measurements of SOA precursors in biomass-burning emissions, and (iii) development of SOA parameters for heterocyclic and oxygenated aromatic compounds based on historical chamber experiments. We find that oxygenated aromatic compounds, including phenols and methoxyphenols, account for slightly less than 60% of the SOA formed and help our model explain the variability in the organic aerosol mass (R2 = 0.68) and O/C (R2 = 0.69) enhancement ratios observed across 11 chamber experiments. Despite abundant emissions, heterocyclic compounds that included furans contribute to ∼20% of the total SOA. The use of pyrolysis-temperature-based or averaged emission profiles to represent SOA precursors, rather than those specific to each fire, provide similar results to within 20%. Our findings demonstrate the necessity of accounting for oxygenated aromatics from biomass-burning emissions and their SOA formation in chemical mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Akherati
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80525, Colorado, United States
| | - Yicong He
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80525, Colorado, United States
| | - Matthew M Coggon
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309, Colorado, United States
- Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder 80305, Colorado, United States
| | - Abigail R Koss
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston 02139, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Anna L Hodshire
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80525, Colorado, United States
| | - Kanako Sekimoto
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309, Colorado, United States
| | - Carsten Warneke
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309, Colorado, United States
- Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder 80305, Colorado, United States
| | - Joost de Gouw
- Department of Chemistry and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder 80309, Colorado, United States
| | - Lindsay Yee
- Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley 94720-3114, California, United States
| | - John H Seinfeld
- Department of Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125, California, United States
| | - Timothy B Onasch
- Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica 01821, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Scott C Herndon
- Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica 01821, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Walter B Knighton
- Department of Chemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717, Montana, United States
| | - Christopher D Cappa
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis 95616, California, United States
| | - Michael J Kleeman
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis 95616, California, United States
| | - Christopher Y Lim
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston 02139, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jesse H Kroll
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston 02139, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Pierce
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80525, Colorado, United States
| | - Shantanu H Jathar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80525, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|