Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) signalling desensitization is counteracted via PAR4 signalling in human platelets

Loss of P2Y1 receptor desensitization does not impact hemostasis or thrombosis despite increased platelet reactivity in vitro

BACKGROUND

The hemostatic plug formation at sites of vascular injury is strongly dependent on rapid platelet activation and integrin-mediated adhesion and aggregation. However, to prevent thrombotic complications, platelet aggregate formation must be a self-limiting process. The second-wave mediator adenosine diphosphate (ADP) activates platelets via Gq-coupled P2Y1 and Gi-coupled P2Y12 receptors. After ADP exposure, the P2Y1 receptor undergoes rapid phosphorylation-induced desensitization, a negative feedback mechanism believed to be critical for limiting thrombus growth.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the role of rapid P2Y1 receptor desensitization on platelet function and thrombus formation in vivo.

METHODS

We analyzed a novel knock-in mouse strain expressing a P2Y1 receptor variant that cannot be phosphorylated beyond residue 340 (P2Y1340-0P), thereby preventing the desensitization of the receptor.

RESULTS

P2Y1340-0P mice followed a Mendelian inheritance pattern, and peripheral platelet counts were comparable between P2Y1340-0P/340-0P and control mice. In vitro, P2Y1340-0P/340-0P platelets were hyperreactive to ADP, showed a robust activation response to the P2Y1 receptor-selective agonist, MRS2365, and did not desensitize in response to repeated ADP challenge. We observed increased calcium mobilization, protein kinase C substrate phosphorylation, alpha granule release, activation of the small GTPase Rap1, and integrin inside-out activation/aggregation. This hyperreactivity, however, did not lead to increased platelet adhesion or excessive plug formation under physiological shear conditions.

CONCLUSION

Our studies demonstrate that receptor phosphorylation at the C-terminus is critical for P2Y1 receptor desensitization in platelets and that impaired desensitization leads to increased P2Y1 receptor signaling in vitro. Surprisingly, desensitization of the P2Y1 receptor is not required for limiting platelet adhesion/aggregation at sites of vascular injury, likely because ADP is degraded quickly or washed away in the bloodstream.

Thrombotic Events in COVID-19 Are Associated With a Lower Use of Prophylactic Anticoagulation Before Hospitalization and Followed by Decreases in Platelet Reactivity

Background: Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a prothrombotic state and a high incidence of thrombotic event(s) (TE). Objectives: To study platelet reactivity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and determine a possible association with the clinical outcomes thrombosis and all-cause mortality. Methods: Seventy nine hospitalized COVID-19 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study and provided blood samples in which platelet reactivity in response to stimulation with ADP and TRAP-6 was determined using flow cytometry. Clinical outcomes included thrombotic events, and all-cause mortality. Results: The incidence of TE in this study was 28% and all-cause mortality 16%. Patients that developed a TE were younger than patients that did not develop a TE [median age of 55 vs. 70 years; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.96 per 1 year of age, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.00; p = 0.041]. Furthermore, patients using preexisting thromboprophylaxis were less likely to develop a thrombotic complication than patients that were not (18 vs. 54%; AOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84; p = 0.029). Conversely, having asthma strongly increased the risk on TE development (AOR = 6.2, 95% CI 1.15-33.7; p = 0.034). No significant differences in baseline P-selectin expression or platelet reactivity were observed between the COVID-19 positive patients (n = 79) and COVID-19 negative hospitalized control patients (n = 21), nor between COVID-19 positive survivors or non-survivors. However, patients showed decreased platelet reactivity in response to TRAP-6 following TE development. Conclusion: We observed an association between the use of preexisting thromboprophylaxis and a decreased risk of TE during COVID-19. This suggests that these therapies are beneficial for coping with COVID-19 associated hypercoagulability. This highlights the importance of patient therapy adherence. We observed lowered platelet reactivity after the development of TE, which might be attributed to platelet desensitization during thromboinflammation.

Adrenoceptor α2A signalling countervails the taming effects of synchronous cyclic nucleotide-elevation on thrombin-induced human platelet activation and aggregation

The healthy vascular endothelium constantly releases autacoids which cause an increase of intracellular cyclic nucleotides to tame platelets from inappropriate activation. Elevating cGMP and cAMP, in line with previous reports, cooperated in the inhibition of isolated human platelet intracellular calcium-mobilization, dense granules secretion, and aggregation provoked by thrombin. Further, platelet alpha granules secretion and, most relevant, integrin α_IIaβ₃ activation in response to thrombin are shown to be prominently affected by the combined elevation of cGMP and cAMP. Since stress-related sympathetic nervous activity is associated with an increase in thrombotic events, we investigated the impact of epinephrine in this setting. We found that the assessed signalling events and functional consequences were to various extents restored by epinephrine, resulting in full and sustained aggregation of isolated platelets. The restoring effects of epinephrine were abolished by either interfering with intracellular calcium-elevation or with PI3-K signalling. Finally, we show that in our experimental setting epinephrine likewise reconstitutes platelet aggregation in heparinized whole blood, which may indicate that this mechanism could also apply in vivo.

Gradient-dependent inhibition of stimulatory signaling from platelet G protein-coupled receptors

As platelet activation is an irreversible and potentially harmful event, platelet stimulatory signaling must be tightly regulated to ensure the filtering-out of inconsequential fluctuations of agonist concentrations in the vascular milieu. Herein, we show that platelet activation via G protein-coupled receptors is gradient-dependent, i.e., determined not only by agonist concentrations per se but also by how rapidly concentrations change over time. We demonstrate that gradient-dependent inhibition is a common feature of all major platelet stimulatory G protein-coupled receptors, while platelet activation via the non-G protein-coupled receptor glycoprotein VI is strictly concentration-dependent. By systematically characterizing the effects of variations in temporal agonist concentration gradients on different aspects of platelet activation, we demonstrate that gradient-dependent inhibition of protease-activated receptors exhibits different kinetics, with platelet activation occurring at lower agonist gradients for protease-activated receptor 4 than for protease-activated receptor 1, but shares a characteristic bimodal effect distribution, as gradient-dependent inhibition increases over a narrow range of gradients, below which aggregation and granule secretion is effectively shut off. In contrast, the effects of gradient-dependent inhibition on platelet activation via adenosine diphosphate and thromboxane receptors increase incrementally over a large range of gradients. Furthermore, depending on the affected activation pathway, gradient-dependent inhibition results in different degrees of refractoriness to subsequent autologous agonist stimulation. Mechanistically, our study identifies an important role for the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent pathway in gradient-dependent inhibition. Together, our findings suggest that gradient-dependent inhibition may represent a new general mechanism for hemostatic regulation in platelets.

The protease-activated receptor 4 Ala120Thr variant alters platelet responsiveness to low-dose thrombin and protease-activated receptor 4 desensitization, and is blocked by non-competitive P2Y12 inhibition

Essentials The rs773902 SNP results in differences in platelet protease-activated receptor (PAR4) function. The functional consequences of rs773902 were analyzed in human platelets and stroke patients. rs773902 affects thrombin-induced platelet function, PAR4 desensitization, stroke association. Enhanced PAR4 Thr120 effects on platelet function are blocked by ticagrelor. SUMMARY: Background F2RL3 encodes protease-activated receptor (PAR) 4 and harbors an A/G single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs773902) with racially dimorphic allelic frequencies. This SNP mediates an alanine to threonine substitution at residue 120 that alters platelet PAR4 activation by the artificial PAR4-activation peptide (PAR4-AP) AYPGKF. Objectives To determine the functional effects of rs773902 on stimulation by a physiological agonist, thrombin, and on antiplatelet antagonist activity. Methods Healthy human donors were screened and genotyped for rs773902. Platelet function in response to thrombin was assessed without and with antiplatelet antagonists. The association of rs773902 alleles with stroke was assessed in the Stroke Genetics Network study. Results As compared with rs773902 GG donors, platelets from rs773902 AA donors had increased aggregation in response to subnanomolar concentrations of thrombin, increased granule secretion, and decreased sensitivity to PAR4 desensitization. In the presence of PAR1 blockade, this genotype effect was abolished by higher concentrations of or longer exposure to thrombin. We were unable to detect a genotype effect on thrombin-induced PAR4 cleavage, dimerization, and lipid raft localization; however, rs773902 AA platelets required a three-fold higher level of PAR4-AP for receptor desensitization. Ticagrelor, but not vorapaxar, abolished the PAR4 variant effect on thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. A significant association of modest effect was detected between the rs773902 A allele and stroke. Conclusion The F2RL3 rs773902 SNP alters platelet reactivity to thrombin; the allelic effect requires P2Y12 , and is not affected by gender. Ticagrelor blocks the enhanced reactivity of rs773902 A platelets. PAR4 encoded by the rs773902 A allele is relatively resistant to desensitization and may contribute to stroke risk.

Platelet function and microparticle levels in atrial fibrillation: Changes during the acute episode

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic risk constitutes a major complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Platelets and microparticles (MPs) are important for hemostasis and thrombosis, however their participation during AF is not well known. The aim of this study was to characterize platelet function and MPs procoagulant and fibrinolytic activity in AF patients and to determine the effects of an acute-AF episode.

METHODS

Blood was collected from paroxysmal (21) and persistent (16) AF patients referred for AF catheter ablation. Ten patients in sinus rhythm for 10days were induced in AF allowing comparisons of left atrium samples before and after induction. Platelet aggregation with ADP, TRAP, collagen, and ristocetin was studied. Platelet surface expression of PAR-1, αIIbβ3, GPIb and P-selectin were evaluated by flow cytometry, and MPs-associated procoagulant and fibrinolytic activity levels were determined by functional assays.

RESULTS

A specific reduction in platelet aggregation to TRAP, activating the thrombin receptor PAR-1, was found in all AF patients. No differences in platelet receptor expression were found. Yet, after acute-induced AF, the platelet response was improved. Furthermore, a significant decrease of left atrium tissue factor-dependent procoagulant activity of MPs was observed.

CONCLUSION

Acute episodes of AF results in a decrease in MPs-associated tissue factor activity, possibly corresponding to consumption, which in turn favors coagulation and the local production of thrombin. A decreased platelet basal aggregation to TRAP may result from PAR1 desensitization, whereas the improved response after an induced episode of AF suggests activation of coagulation and PAR1 re-sensitization.

Contributions of Protease-Activated Receptors PAR1 and PAR4 to Thrombin-Induced GPIIbIIIa Activation in Human Platelets

Human platelets display a unique dual receptor system for responding to its primary endogenous activator, α-thrombin. Because of the lack of efficacious antagonists, the field has relied on synthetic peptides and pepducins to describe protease-activated receptor PAR1 and PAR4 signaling. The precise contributions of each receptor have not been established in the context of thrombin. We took advantage of newly discovered PAR antagonists to contrast the contribution of PAR1 and PAR4 to thrombin-mediated activation of the platelet fibrin receptor (GPIIbIIIa). PAR1 is required for platelet activation at low but not high concentrations of thrombin, and maximal platelet activation at high concentrations of thrombin requires PAR4. As the concentration of thrombin is increased, PAR1 signaling is quickly overcome by PAR4 signaling, leaving a narrow window of low thrombin concentrations that exclusively engage PAR1. PAR4 antagonism reduces the maximum thrombin response by over 50%. Thus, although the PAR1 response still active at higher concentrations of thrombin, this response is superseded by PAR4. Truncation of a known PAR4 antagonist and identification of the minimum pharmacophore converted the mechanism of inhibition from noncompetitive to competitive, such that the antagonist could be outcompeted by increasing doses of the ligand. Fragments retained efficacy against both soluble and tethered ligands with lower cLogP values and an increased free fraction in plasma. These reversible, competitive compounds represent a route toward potentially safer PAR4 antagonists for clinical utility and the development of tools such as radioligands and positron emission tomography tracers that are not currently available to the field for this target.

Inhibition of protease-activated receptor 4 impairs platelet procoagulant activity during thrombus formation in human blood

Essentials The platelet thrombin receptor, PAR4, is an emerging anti-thrombotic drug target. We examined the anti-platelet & anti-thrombotic effects of PAR4 inhibition in human blood. PAR4 inhibition impaired platelet procoagulant activity in isolated cells and during thrombosis. Our study shows PAR4 is required for platelet procoagulant function & thrombosis in human blood.

SUMMARY

Background Thrombin-induced platelet activation is important for arterial thrombosis. Thrombin activates human platelets predominantly via protease-activated receptor (PAR)1 and PAR4. PAR1 has higher affinity for thrombin, and the first PAR1 antagonist, vorapaxar, was recently approved for use as an antiplatelet agent. However, vorapaxar is contraindicated in a significant number of patients, owing to adverse bleeding events. Consequently, there is renewed interest in the role of platelet PAR4 in the setting of thrombus formation. Objectives To determine the specific antiplatelet effects of inhibiting PAR4 function during thrombus formation in human whole blood. Methods and Results We developed a rabbit polyclonal antibody against the thrombin cleavage site of PAR4, and showed it to be a highly specific inhibitor of PAR4-mediated platelet function. This function-blocking anti-PAR4 antibody was used to probe for PAR4-dependent platelet functions in human isolated platelets in the absence and presence of concomitant PAR1 inhibition. The anti-PAR4 antibody alone was sufficient to abolish the sustained elevation of cytosolic calcium level and consequent phosphatidylserine exposure induced by thrombin, but did not significantly inhibit integrin αII b β3 activation, α-granule secretion, or aggregation. In accord with these in vitro experiments on isolated platelets, selective inhibition of PAR4, but not of PAR1, impaired thrombin activity (fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based thrombin sensor) and fibrin formation (anti-fibrin antibody) in an ex vivo whole blood flow thrombosis assay. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that PAR4 is required for platelet procoagulant function during thrombus formation in human blood, and suggest PAR4 inhibition as a potential target for the prevention of arterial thrombosis.

Protease-activated receptor 4: from structure to function and back again

Protease-activated receptors are a family of four GPCRs (PAR1-PAR4) with a number of unique attributes. Nearly two and a half decades after the discovery of the first PAR, an antagonist targeting this receptor has been approved for human use. The first-in-class PAR1 antagonist, vorapaxar, was approved for use in the USA in 2014 for the prevention of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or with peripheral arterial disease. These recent developments indicate the clinical potential of manipulating PAR function. While much work has been aimed at uncovering the function of PAR1 and, to a lesser extent, PAR2, comparatively little is known regarding the pharmacology and physiology of PAR3 and PAR4. Recent studies have begun to develop the pharmacological and genetic tools required to study PAR4 function in detail, and there is now emerging evidence for the function of PAR4 in disease settings. In this review, we detail the discovery, structure, pharmacology, physiological significance and therapeutic potential of PAR4. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on Molecular Pharmacology of G Protein-Coupled Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v173.20/issuetoc.

Protease-activated receptor 4: a critical participator in inflammatory response

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are G protein-coupled receptors of which four members PAR1, PAR2, PAR3, and PAR4 have been identified, characterized by a typical mechanism of activation involving various related proteases. The amino-terminal sequence of PARs is cleaved by a broad array of proteases, leading to specific proteolytic cleavage which forms endogenous tethered ligands to induce agonist-biased PAR activation. The biological effect of PARs activated by coagulation proteases to regulate hemostasis and thrombosis plays an enormous role in the cardiovascular system, while PAR4 can also be activated by trypsin, cathepsin G, the activated factor X of the coagulation cascade, and trypsin IV. Irrespective of its role in thrombin-induced platelet aggregation, PAR4 activation is believed to be involved in inflammatory lesions, as show by investigations that have unmasked the effects of PAR4 on neutrophil recruitment, the regulation of edema, and plasma extravasation. This review summarizes the roles of PAR4 in coagulation and other extracellular protease pathways, which activate PAR4 to participate in normal regulation and disease.

Thrombin-induced reactive oxygen species generation in platelets: A novel role for protease-activated receptor 4 and GPIbα

Background

Platelets are essential for maintaining haemostasis and play a key role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Upon ligation of platelet receptors through subendothelial matrix proteins, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated, further amplifying the platelet activation response. Thrombin, a potent platelet activator, can signal through GPIbα and protease-activated receptor (PAR) 1 and PAR4 on human platelets, and recently has been implicated in the generation of ROS. While ROS are known to have key roles in intra-platelet signalling and subsequent platelet activation, the precise receptors and signalling pathways involved in thrombin-induced ROS generation have yet to be fully elucidated.

Objective

To investigate the relative contribution of platelet GPIbα and PARs to thrombin-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation.

Methods and results

Highly specific antagonists targeting PAR1 and PAR4, and the GPIbα-cleaving enzyme, Naja kaouthia (Nk) protease, were used in quantitative flow cytometry assays of thrombin-induced ROS production. Antagonists of PAR4 but not PAR1, inhibited thrombin-derived ROS generation. Removal of the GPIbα ligand binding region attenuated PAR4-induced and completely inhibited thrombin-induced ROS formation. Similarly, PAR4 deficiency in mice abolished thrombin-induced ROS generation. Additionally, GPIbα and PAR4-dependent ROS formation were shown to be mediated through focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1) proteins.

Conclusions

Both GPIbα and PAR4 are required for thrombin-induced ROS formation, suggesting a novel functional cooperation between GPIbα and PAR4. Our study identifies a novel role for PAR4 in mediating thrombin-induced ROS production that was not shared by PAR1. This suggests an independent signalling pathway in platelet activation that may be targeted therapeutically.

•

PAR4 plays an important role in platelet-derived ROS generation.

•

Thrombin-induced ROS generation in platelets require both GPIbα and PAR4.

•

Potential functional association between GPIbα and PAR4 receptors and mouse and human platelets.

•

GPIbα and PAR4-dependent ROS formation is mediated through FAK and NOX1 proteins.

Modulation and pre-amplification of PAR1 signaling by ADP acting via the P2Y12 receptor during platelet subpopulation formation

BACKGROUND

Two major soluble blood platelet activators are thrombin and ADP. Of these two, only thrombin can induce mitochondrial collapse and programmed cell death leading to phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure required for blood clotting reactions acceleration. Thrombin can also greatly potentiate collagen-induced PS exposure. However, ADP acting through the P2Y12 receptor was shown to increase the PS-exposing (PS+) platelets fraction produced by thrombin or thrombin-plus-collagen via an unknown mechanism.

METHODS

We developed a comprehensive multicompartmental computational model of platelet PAR1-and-P2Y12 calcium signal transduction that included cytoplasmic signaling, dense tubular system and mitochondria. To test model predictions, flow cytometry experiments with washed, annexin V-labeled platelets were performed.

RESULTS

Stimulation of thrombin receptor PAR1 in the model induced cytoplasmic calcium oscillations, calcium uptake by mitochondria, opening of the permeability transition pore and collapse of the mitochondrial membrane potential. ADP stimulation of P2Y12 led to cAMP decrease that, in turn, caused changes in phospholipase C phosphorylation by protein kinase A, increase in cytoplasmic calcium level and, consequently, PS+ platelet formation. ADP addition before stimulation of PAR1 produced much greater increase of the PS+ fraction because cAMP concentration had time to go down prior to calcium oscillations; this prediction was also tested and confirmed experimentally.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a mechanism of ADP-dependent PS exposure regulation and show a likely mode of action that could be important for the PS exposure regulation in thrombi, where ADP is released before thrombin formation.

Investigation of the essential role of platelet-tumor cell interactions in metastasis progression using an agent-based model

BACKGROUND

Metastatic tumors are a major source of morbidity and mortality for most cancers. Interaction of circulating tumor cells with endothelium, platelets and neutrophils play an important role in the early stages of metastasis formation. These complex dynamics have proven difficult to study in experimental models. Prior computational models of metastases have focused on tumor cell growth in a host environment, or prediction of metastasis formation from clinical data. We used agent-based modeling (ABM) to dynamically represent hypotheses of essential steps involved in circulating tumor cell adhesion and interaction with other circulating cells, examine their functional constraints, and predict effects of inhibiting specific mechanisms.

METHODS

We developed an ABM of Early Metastasis (ABMEM), a descriptive semi-mechanistic model that replicates experimentally observed behaviors of populations of circulating tumor cells, neutrophils, platelets and endothelial cells while incorporating representations of known surface receptor, autocrine and paracrine interactions. Essential downstream cellular processes were incorporated to simulate activation in response to stimuli, and calibrated with experimental data. The ABMEM was used to identify potential points of interdiction through examination of dynamic outcomes such as rate of tumor cell binding after inhibition of specific platelet or tumor receptors.

RESULTS

The ABMEM reproduced experimental data concerning neutrophil rolling over endothelial cells, inflammation-induced binding between neutrophils and platelets, and tumor cell interactions with these cells. Simulated platelet inhibition with anti-platelet drugs produced unstable aggregates with frequent detachment and re-binding. The ABMEM replicates findings from experimental models of circulating tumor cell adhesion, and suggests platelets play a critical role in this pre-requisite for metastasis formation. Similar effects were observed with inhibition of tumor integrin αV/β3. These findings suggest that anti-platelet or anti-integrin therapies may decrease metastasis by preventing stable circulating tumor cell adhesion.

CONCLUSION

Circulating tumor cell adhesion is a complex, dynamic process involving multiple cell-cell interactions. The ABMEM successfully captures the essential interactions necessary for this process, and allows for in-silico iterative characterization and invalidation of proposed hypotheses regarding this process in conjunction with in-vitro and in-vivo models. Our results suggest that anti-platelet therapies and anti-integrin therapies may play a promising role in inhibiting metastasis formation.

Protease-activated receptor (PAR) 1 and PAR4 differentially regulate factor V expression from human platelets

With the recent interest of protease-activated receptors (PAR) 1 and PAR4 as possible targets for the treatment of thrombotic disorders, we compared the efficacy of protease-activated receptor (PAR)1 and PAR4 in the generation of procoagulant phenotypes on platelet membranes. PAR4-activating peptide (AP)-stimulated platelets promoted thrombin generation in plasma up to 5 minutes earlier than PAR1-AP-stimulated platelets. PAR4-AP-mediated factor V (FV) association with the platelet surface was 1.6-fold greater than for PAR1-AP. Moreover, PAR4 stimulation resulted in a 3-fold greater release of microparticles, compared with PAR1 stimulation. More robust FV secretion and microparticle generation with PAR4-AP was attributable to stronger and more sustained phosphorylation of myosin light chain at serine 19 and threonine 18. Inhibition of Rho-kinase reduced PAR4-AP-mediated FV secretion and microparticle generation to PAR1-AP-mediated levels. Thrombin generation assays measuring prothrombinase complex activity demonstrated 1.5-fold higher peak thrombin levels on PAR4-AP-stimulated platelets, compared with PAR1-AP-stimulated platelets. Rho-kinase inhibition reduced PAR4-AP-mediated peak thrombin generation by 25% but had no significant effect on PAR1-AP-mediated thrombin generation. In conclusion, stimulation of PAR4 on platelets leads to faster and more robust thrombin generation, compared with PAR1 stimulation. The greater procoagulant potential is related to more efficient FV release from intracellular stores and microparticle production driven by stronger and more sustained myosin light chain phosphorylation. These data have implications about the role of PAR4 during hemostasis and are clinically relevant in light of recent efforts to develop PAR antagonists to treat thrombotic disorders.

Mapping human protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4) homodimer interface to transmembrane helix 4

Thrombin activates platelets by binding and cleaving protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 (PAR1 and PAR4). Because of the importance of PAR4 activation on platelets in humans and mice and emerging roles for PAR4 in other tissues, experiments were done to characterize the interaction between PAR4 homodimers. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) were used to examine the PAR4 homodimer interface. In bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments, PAR4 formed homodimers that were disrupted by unlabeled PAR4 in a concentration-dependent manner, but not by rhodopsin. In BRET experiments, the PAR4 homodimers showed a specific interaction as indicated by a hyperbolic BRET signal in response to increasing PAR4-GFP expression. PAR4 did not interact with rhodopsin in BRET assays. The threshold maximum BRET signal was disrupted in a concentration-dependent manner by unlabeled PAR4. In contrast, rhodopsin was unable to disrupt the BRET signal, indicating that the disruption of the PAR4 homodimer is not due to nonspecific interactions. A panel of rho-PAR4 chimeras and PAR4 point mutants has mapped the dimer interface to hydrophobic residues in transmembrane helix 4. Finally, mutations that disrupted dimer formation had reduced calcium mobilization in response to the PAR4 agonist peptide. These results link the loss of dimer formation to a loss of PAR4 signaling.

Thrombin receptor levels in platelet concentrates during storage and their impact on platelet functionality

BACKGROUND

Quality control of platelet (PLT) concentrates is challenging, due to PLT lesions, which are difficult to detect with routine methods. The search for reliable PLT lesion biomarkers is focused on the role of PLTs in primary hemostasis. PLT transfusions also have a significant impact on secondary hemostasis. In this phase, responsiveness of PLTs to small amounts of thrombin is crucial. PAR1 and PAR4 are protease-activated receptors and are responsible for thrombin reactivity of human PLTs. This study should elucidate if levels of those two receptors are changing in PLT concentrates during storage and if those changes have an impact on PLT aggregation and support of thrombin generation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

PLT concentrates from buffy coat preparations were stored in SSP+ solution for 9 days at 22±2°C on a horizontal flatbed agitator, and samples were taken daily for analysis. PAR1 and PAR4 levels were evaluated using Western blot analysis. PLT aggregation was measured using Born aggregometry and specific PAR1 or PAR4 agonists. Thrombin generation was measured using calibrated automated thrombography.

RESULTS

Levels of both receptors (PAR1 and PAR4) started to decrease after 5 days of storage. PAR1-mediated PLT aggregation remained constant, whereas PAR4-mediated PLT aggregation decreased with storage time. Rate of thrombin generation was accelerated after 5 days of storage.

CONCLUSION

Decreasing levels of PARs in PLT concentrates after 5 days of storage influenced PAR4-mediated, but not PAR1-mediated, aggregation. Thrombin generation with senescent PLTs was increased, which may be attributed to other mechanisms promoting increased phosphatidylserine exposure.

Protein kinase C regulation of 12-lipoxygenase-mediated human platelet activation

Platelet activation is important in the regulation of hemostasis and thrombosis. Uncontrolled activation of platelets may lead to arterial thrombosis, which is a major cause of myocardial infarction and stroke. After activation, metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA) by 12-lipoxygenase (12-LOX) may play a significant role in regulating the degree and stability of platelet activation because inhibition of 12-LOX significantly attenuates platelet aggregation in response to various agonists. Protein kinase C (PKC) activation is also known to be an important regulator of platelet activity. Using a newly developed selective inhibitor for 12-LOX and a pan-PKC inhibitor, we investigated the role of PKC in 12-LOX-mediated regulation of agonist signaling in the platelet. To determine the role of PKC within the 12-LOX pathway, a number of biochemical endpoints were measured, including platelet aggregation, calcium mobilization, and integrin activation. Inhibition of 12-LOX or PKC resulted in inhibition of dense granule secretion and attenuation of both aggregation and αIIbβ(3) activation. However, activation of PKC downstream of 12-LOX inhibition rescued agonist-induced aggregation and integrin activation. Furthermore, inhibition of 12-LOX had no effect on PKC-mediated aggregation, indicating that 12-LOX is upstream of PKC. These studies support an essential role for PKC downstream of 12-LOX activation in human platelets and suggest 12-LOX as a possible target for antiplatelet therapy.