1
|
Partial and full deletion of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α4 and β2 subunits reduces sensitivity to acute nicotine administration and development of tolerance following chronic nicotine administration. Behav Pharmacol 2021; 31:688-701. [PMID: 32568759 DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The diversity of nicotinic cholinergic receptor (nAChR) subunits underlies the complex responses to nicotine. Mice differing in the expression of α4 and β2 subunits, which are most widely expressed in brain, were evaluated for the responses to acute nicotine administration on Y-maze crossings and rears, open-field locomotion and body temperature following chronic treatment with nicotine (0, 0.25, 1.0 and 4.0 mg/kg/h). Deletion or partial deletion of the α4, β2 or both nAChR subunits reduced the sensitivity of mice to acute nicotine administration. This reduced sensitivity was gene dose-dependent. Modification of α4 subunit expression elicited a greater reduction in sensitivity than the modification of β2 subunit expression. No measurable tolerance was observed for mice of any genotype following chronic treatment with 0.25 mg/kg/h nicotine. Modest tolerance was noted following treatment with 1.0 mg/kg/h. Greater tolerance was observed following treatment with 4.0 mg/kg/h. The extent of tolerance differed among the mice depending on genotype: wild-type (α4 and β2) developed measurable tolerance for all four tests. Heterozygotes (α4, β2 and α4/β2) developed tolerance for only Y-maze crossings and body temperature. Null mutants (α4 and β2) did not become tolerant. However, following chronic treatment with 4.0 mg/kg/h nicotine, wild type, α4 and α4 mice displayed increased Y-maze crossings following acute administration of 0.5 mg/kg nicotine that may reflect the activity of α6β2*-nAChR. These results confirm the importance of the α4 and β2 nAChR subunits in mediating acute and chronic effects of nicotine on locomotion and body temperature in the mouse.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kutlu MG, Gould TJ. Nicotine modulation of fear memories and anxiety: Implications for learning and anxiety disorders. Biochem Pharmacol 2015; 97:498-511. [PMID: 26231942 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are a group of crippling mental diseases affecting millions of Americans with a 30% lifetime prevalence and costs associated with healthcare of $42.3 billion. While anxiety disorders show high levels of co-morbidity with smoking (45.3% vs. 22.5% in healthy individuals), they are also more common among the smoking population (22% vs. 11.1% in the non-smoking population). Moreover, there is clear evidence that smoking modulates symptom severity in patients with anxiety disorders. In order to better understand this relationship, several animal paradigms are used to model several key symptoms of anxiety disorders; these include fear conditioning and measures of anxiety. Studies clearly demonstrate that nicotine mediates acquisition and extinction of fear as well as anxiety through the modulation of specific subtypes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in brain regions involved in emotion processing such as the hippocampus. However, the direction of nicotine's effects on these behaviors is determined by several factors that include the length of administration, hippocampus-dependency of the fear learning task, and source of anxiety (novelty-driven vs. social anxiety). Overall, the studies reviewed here suggest that nicotine alters behaviors related to fear and anxiety and that nicotine contributes to the development, maintenance, and reoccurrence of anxiety disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas J Gould
- Temple University, Weiss Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A proposed resolution to the paradox of drug reward: Dopamine's evolution from an aversive signal to a facilitator of drug reward via negative reinforcement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015; 56:50-61. [PMID: 26116542 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The mystery surrounding how plant neurotoxins came to possess reinforcing properties is termed the paradox of drug reward. Here we propose a resolution to this paradox whereby dopamine - which has traditionally been viewed as a signal of reward - initially signaled aversion and encouraged escape. We suggest that after being consumed, plant neurotoxins such as nicotine activated an aversive dopaminergic pathway, thereby deterring predatory herbivores. Later evolutionary events - including the development of a GABAergic system capable of modulating dopaminergic activity - led to the ability to down-regulate and 'control' this dopamine-based aversion. We speculate that this negative reinforcement system evolved so that animals could suppress aversive states such as hunger in order to attend to other internal drives (such as mating and shelter) that would result in improved organismal fitness.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hannestad JO, Cosgrove KP, DellaGioia NF, Perkins E, Bois F, Bhagwagar Z, Seibyl JP, McClure-Begley TD, Picciotto MR, Esterlis I. Changes in the cholinergic system between bipolar depression and euthymia as measured with [123I]5IA single photon emission computed tomography. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 74:768-76. [PMID: 23773793 PMCID: PMC3805761 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Revised: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cholinergic system is substantially altered in individuals with major depression and is partially restored when depression remits. We quantified the availability of β2-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (β2*-nAChR) in subjects with bipolar disorder. METHODS Twenty-five subjects with bipolar disorder (15 depressed, 10 euthymic) and 25 sex- and age-matched control subjects had a [(123)I]5IA-85380 single photon emission computed tomography scan to quantify β2*-nAChR VT/fP (total volume of distribution, corrected for individual differences in metabolism and protein binding of the radiotracer). Average VT/fP was compared between groups and correlated with clinical characteristics. Postmortem analysis of β2*-nAChRs was conducted using equilibrium binding with [(125)I]5IA in subjects with bipolar disorder and matched control subjects. RESULTS We showed significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability (20%-38%) in subjects with bipolar depression compared with euthymic and control subjects across all brain regions assessed (frontal, parietal, temporal, and anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, striatum). The postmortem binding study in which endogenous acetylcholine was washed out did not show a statistically significant difference in β2*-nAChR number in temporal cortex of the bipolar depressed and control groups (15% difference; p = .2). CONCLUSIONS We show that the alteration in the cholinergic system observed during a depressive episode appears to resolve during euthymia. We suggest that lower VT/fP observed in vivo may be due to a combination of higher endogenous acetylcholine levels during depression, which could compete with radiotracer binding to the receptor in vivo, and lower receptor number in bipolar depression. Identification of differences in cholinergic signaling in subjects with bipolar depression may improve our understanding of its etiology and reveal new treatment targets.
Collapse
|
5
|
Koranda JL, Cone JJ, McGehee DS, Roitman MF, Beeler JA, Zhuang X. Nicotinic receptors regulate the dynamic range of dopamine release in vivo. J Neurophysiol 2013; 111:103-11. [PMID: 24089398 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00269.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are expressed presynaptically on dopamine axon terminals, and their activation by endogenous acetylcholine from striatal cholinergic interneurons enhances dopamine release both independently of and in concert with dopamine neuron activity. Acute nAChR inactivation is believed to enhance the contrast between low- and high-frequency dopamine cell activity. Although these studies reveal a key role for acute activation and inactivation of nAChRs in striatal microcircuitry, it remains unknown if chronic inactivation/desensitization of nAChRs can alter dopamine release dynamics. Using in vivo cyclic voltammetry in anaesthetized mice, we examined whether chronic inactivation of nAChRs modulates dopamine release across a parametric range of stimulation, varying both frequency and pulse number. Deletion of β2*nAChRs and chronic nicotine exposure greatly diminished dopamine release across the entire range of stimulation parameters. In addition, we observed a facilitation of dopamine release at low frequency and pulse number in wild-type mice that is absent in the β2* knockout and chronic nicotine mice. These data suggest that deletion or chronic desensitization of nAChRs reduces the dynamic range of dopamine release in response to dopamine cell activity, decreasing rather than increasing contrast between high and low dopamine activity.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yi B, Long S, González-Cestari TF, Henderson BJ, Pavlovicz RE, Werbovetz K, Li C, McKay DB. Discovery of benzamide analogs as negative allosteric modulators of human neuronal nicotinic receptors: pharmacophore modeling and structure-activity relationship studies. Bioorg Med Chem 2013; 21:4730-43. [PMID: 23757208 PMCID: PMC4347880 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.03.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2013] [Revised: 03/22/2013] [Accepted: 03/29/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The present study describes our ongoing efforts toward the discovery of drugs that selectively target nAChR subtypes. We exploited knowledge on nAChR ligands and their binding site that were previously identified by our laboratory through virtual screenings and identified benzamide analogs as a novel chemical class of neuronal nicotinic receptor (nAChR) ligands. The lead molecule, compound 1 (4-(allyloxy)-N-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)benzamide) inhibits nAChR activity with an IC₅₀ value of 6.0 (3.4-10.6) μM on human α4β2 nAChRs with a ∼5-fold preference against human α3β4 nAChRs. Twenty-six analogs of compound 1 were also either synthesized or purchased for structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies and provided information relating the chemical/structural properties of the molecules to their ability to inhibit nAChR activity. The discovery of subtype-selective ligands of nAChRs described here should contribute significantly to our understanding of the involvement of specific nAChR subtypes in normal and pathophysiological states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bitna Yi
- Division of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, 500 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sihui Long
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Tatiana F. González-Cestari
- Division of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, 500 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Brandon J. Henderson
- Division of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, 500 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ryan E. Pavlovicz
- Biophysics Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Karl Werbovetz
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Chenglong Li
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Biophysics Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dennis B. McKay
- Division of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, 500 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rammes G, Danysz W, Parsons CG. Pharmacodynamics of memantine: an update. Curr Neuropharmacol 2010; 6:55-78. [PMID: 19305788 PMCID: PMC2645549 DOI: 10.2174/157015908783769671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2007] [Revised: 05/10/2007] [Accepted: 11/05/2007] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Memantine received marketing authorization from the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) for the treatment of moderately severe to severe Alzheimer s disease (AD) in Europe on 17(th) May 2002 and shortly thereafter was also approved by the FDA for use in the same indication in the USA. Memantine is a moderate affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with strong voltage-dependency and fast kinetics. Due to this mechanism of action (MOA), there is a wealth of other possible therapeutic indications for memantine and numerous preclinical data in animal models support this assumption. This review is intended to provide an update on preclinical studies on the pharmacodynamics of memantine, with an additional focus on animal models of diseases aside from the approved indication. For most studies prior to 1999, the reader is referred to a previous review [196].In general, since 1999, considerable additional preclinical evidence has accumulated supporting the use of memantine in AD (both symptomatic and neuroprotective). In addition, there has been further confirmation of the MOA of memantine as an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist and essentially no data contradicting our understanding of the benign side effect profile of memantine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Rammes
- Clinical Neuropharmacology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chatterjee S, Bartlett SE. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as pharmacotherapeutic targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorders. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS 2010; 9:60-76. [PMID: 20201817 DOI: 10.2174/187152710790966597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2009] [Accepted: 12/13/2009] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are complex, and developing effective treatments will require the combination of novel medications and cognitive behavioral therapy approaches. Epidemiological studies have shown there is a high correlation between alcohol consumption and tobacco use, and the prevalence of smoking in alcoholics is as high as 80% compared to about 30% for the general population. Both preclinical and clinical data provide evidence that nicotine administration increases alcohol intake and non-specific nicotinic receptor antagonists reduce alcohol-mediated behaviors. As nicotine interacts specifically with the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) system, this suggests that nAChRs play an important role in the behavioral effects of alcohol. In this review, we discuss the importance of nAChRs for the treatment of AUDs and argue that the use of FDA approved nAChR ligands, such as varenicline and mecamylamine, approved as smoking cessation aids may prove to be valuable treatments for AUDs. We also address the importance of combining effective medications with behavioral therapy for the treatment of alcohol dependent individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Chatterjee
- Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center at the University of California San Francisco, 5858 Horton Street, Suite 200 Emeryville, CA 94608, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Albuquerque EX, Pereira EFR, Alkondon M, Rogers SW. Mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 2009; 89:73-120. [PMID: 19126755 PMCID: PMC2713585 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1224] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The classical studies of nicotine by Langley at the turn of the 20th century introduced the concept of a "receptive substance," from which the idea of a "receptor" came to light. Subsequent studies aided by the Torpedo electric organ, a rich source of muscle-type nicotinic receptors (nAChRs), and the discovery of alpha-bungarotoxin, a snake toxin that binds pseudo-irreversibly to the muscle nAChR, resulted in the muscle nAChR being the best characterized ligand-gated ion channel hitherto. With the advancement of functional and genetic studies in the late 1980s, the existence of nAChRs in the mammalian brain was confirmed and the realization that the numerous nAChR subtypes contribute to the psychoactive properties of nicotine and other drugs of abuse and to the neuropathology of various diseases, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and schizophrenia, has since emerged. This review provides a comprehensive overview of these findings and the more recent revelations of the impact that the rich diversity in function and expression of this receptor family has on neuronal and nonneuronal cells throughout the body. Despite these numerous developments, our understanding of the contributions of specific neuronal nAChR subtypes to the many facets of physiology throughout the body remains in its infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edson X Albuquerque
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gahring LC, Rogers SW. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression in the hippocampus of 27 mouse strains reveals novel inhibitory circuitry. Hippocampus 2008; 18:737-49. [PMID: 18446824 DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Mouse strains are well-characterized to exhibit differences in their physiological and behavioral responses to nicotine. This report examines the expression of the high-affinity nicotine binding receptor subunit, neuronal nicotinic receptor subunit alpha 4 (nAChR alpha 4), in the dorsal hippocampus of 27 inbred mouse strains. Multiple differences among mouse strains in the cellular expression of nAChR alpha 4 between subregions of the hippocampal field are evident. Differences that we describe in the expression of nAChR alpha 4 suggest mouse strains of diverse genetic origin could exhibit significant variation in how this receptor contributes to modulating intrahippocampal circuitry. These findings define a genetic frame-work in which the strain-specific responses to nicotine include underlying contributions by the varied anatomical context in which nAChRs are expressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorise C Gahring
- Salt Lake City VA-Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Caldarone BJ, King SL, Picciotto MR. Sex differences in anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity following chronic nicotine exposure in mice. Neurosci Lett 2008; 439:187-91. [PMID: 18524488 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2008] [Revised: 05/06/2008] [Accepted: 05/08/2008] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Smoking appears to increase overall levels of stress, despite self-reports that men and women smoke to control symptoms of anxiety. The overall incidence of anxiety disorders is also significantly higher in women. This study examined whether behavioral sensitivity to chronic nicotine varies across sexes in mice. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were exposed chronically to nicotine in the drinking water (50, 100, or 200 microg/ml) and tested for locomotor activation and anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze (EPM). Female mice were less sensitive to the locomotor activating effects of chronic nicotine. Whereas both males and females showed increases in locomotor activity at the highest (200 microg/ml) concentration of nicotine, only males showed locomotor activation at the middle (100 microg/ml) concentration. The decreased sensitivity in females could not be explained by reduced nicotine intake compared to males. In the EPM, nicotine produced an anxiogenic-like response in females, but had no effect in males. Treatment with the high (200 microg/ml) dose of nicotine reduced the amount of time spent in the open arms of the EPM in female, but not male mice. No differences in the anxiogenic-like response to chronic nicotine was observed between beta2-subunit knockout and wildtype mice, suggesting that beta2-subunit containing nicotinic receptors do not mediate the anxiogenic-like response to chronic nicotine in females. This shows that female mice have an anxiogenic-like response to chronic nicotine, but are less sensitive to nicotine's psychostimulant properties, which may be related to the increased relapse to smoking following abstinence in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J Caldarone
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, 3rd Floor Research, New Haven, CT 06508, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Intracellular complexes of the beta2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in brain identified by proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:20570-5. [PMID: 18077321 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710314104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Nicotine acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) comprise a family of ligand-gated channels widely expressed in the mammalian brain. The beta2 subunit is an abundant protein subunit critically involved in the cognitive and behavioral properties of nicotine as well as in the mechanisms of nicotine addiction. In this work, we used matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-TOF MS/MS) to uncover protein interactions of the intracellular loop of the beta2 subunit and components of immunoprecipitated beta2-nAChR complexes from mouse brain. Using the beta2-knockout mouse to exclude nonspecific binding to the beta2 antibody, we identify 21 nAChR-interacting proteins (NIPs) expressed in brain. Western blot analysis confirmed the association between the beta2 subunit and candidate NIPs. Based on their functional profiles, the hypothesis is suggested that the identified NIPs can regulate the trafficking and signaling of the beta2-nAChR. Interactions of the beta2 subunit with NIPs such as G protein alpha, G protein-regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth 1, and G protein-activated K(+) channel 1 suggest a link between nAChRs and cellular G protein pathways. These findings reveal intracellular interactions of the beta2 subunit and may contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of nAChR signaling and trafficking in neurons.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kenny PJ, Markou A. Nicotine self-administration acutely activates brain reward systems and induces a long-lasting increase in reward sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006; 31:1203-11. [PMID: 16192981 DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Nicotine is a major component of tobacco smoke contributing to the initiation and persistence of the harmful tobacco habit in human smokers. The reinforcing effects of nicotine likely arise through its ability to stimulate brain circuitry mediating the detection and experiencing of natural rewards. Nevertheless, remarkably little is known concerning the acute or long-lasting actions of nicotine on brain reward systems in vivo. Here, we investigated the effects of intravenously self-administered nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/infusion, free base) on the sensitivity of brain reward systems, reflected in alterations of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds in rats. Rats self-administered nicotine during 1 or 12 h daily sessions, with reward thresholds assessed 1 h before and 15 min after each self-administration session. Control rats remained nicotine naïve throughout. Nicotine self-administration increased the sensitivity of brain reward systems, detected by post-nicotine lowering of reward thresholds in 1 and 12 h rats. This nicotine-enhanced sensitivity of reward systems was reversed by the high-affinity nicotinic receptor antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE; 3 mg/kg). Surprisingly, nicotine-induced excitation of reward systems persisted for at least 36 days after nicotine self-administration had ceased. Overall, these data demonstrate that rats can voluntarily consume quantities of nicotine sufficient to increase the sensitivity of brain reward systems, an action likely crucial in establishing and maintaining the nicotine habit. Moreover, self-administered nicotine resets the sensitivity of reward systems to a new increased level, thereby imprinting an indelible 'memory' of its effects in reward systems, an action that so far appears unique to nicotine among drugs of abuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Kenny
- Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jensen AA, Frølund B, Liljefors T, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: structural revelations, target identifications, and therapeutic inspirations. J Med Chem 2005; 48:4705-45. [PMID: 16033252 DOI: 10.1021/jm040219e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 431] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anders A Jensen
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Susceptibility to drug addiction depends on genetic and environmental factors and their complex interactions. Studies with mammalian models have identified molecular targets, neurochemical systems, and brain regions that mediate some of the addictive properties of abused drugs. Yet, our understanding of how the primary effects of drugs lead to addiction remains incomplete. Recently, researchers have turned to the invertebrate model systems Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans to dissect the mechanisms by which abused drugs modulate behavior. Due to their sophisticated genetics, relatively simple anatomy, and their remarkable molecular similarity to mammals, these invertebrate models should provide useful insights into the mechanisms of drug action. Here we review recent behavioral and genetic studies in flies and worms on the effects of ethanol, cocaine, and nicotine, three of the most widely abused drugs in the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred W Wolf
- Department of Anatomy and Program in Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143-0452, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Picciotto MR, Brunzell DH, Caldarone BJ. Effect of nicotine and nicotinic receptors on anxiety and depression. Neuroreport 2002; 13:1097-106. [PMID: 12151749 DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200207020-00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Nicotine has been shown to have effects on anxiety and depression in both human and animal studies. These studies suggest that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) can modulate the function of pathways involved in stress response, anxiety and depression in the normal brain, and that smoking can result in alterations of anxiety level and mood. The effects of nicotine are complex however, and nicotine treatment can be either anxiolytic or anxiogenic depending on the anxiety model tested, the route of nicotine administration and the time course of administration. The paradoxical effects of nicotine on emotionality are likely due to the broad expression of nAChRs throughout the brain, the large number of nAChR subtypes that have been identified and the ability of nicotine treatment to both activate and desensitize nAChRs. Activation of nAChRs has been shown to modulate many systems associated with stress response including stress hormone pathways, monoaminergic transmission and release of classical neurotransmitters throughout the brain. Local administration studies in animals have identified brain areas that may be involved in the anxiogenic and anxiolytic actions of nicotine including the lateral septum, the dorsal raphe nuclei, the mesolimbic dopamine system and the hippocampus. The ensemble of studies to date suggest that under certain conditions nicotine can act as an anxiolytic and an antidepressant, but that following chronic use, adaptations to nicotine can occur resulting in increased anxiety and depression following withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina R Picciotto
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06508, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Changeux JP. Use of knock-out mice to determine the molecular basis for the actions of nicotine. Nicotine Tob Res 2002; 1 Suppl 2:S121-5; discussion S139-40. [PMID: 11768168 DOI: 10.1080/14622299050011931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Recombinant DNA techniques have been used to identify the family of molecules that mediate nicotine's effects on the brain. Nicotine binds and activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) which are made up of combinations of individual nicotinic subunits. It is important to determine which of the many possible subunit combinations are responsible for the physiological and behavioral effects of nicotine that lead to addiction. Molecular genetic tools such as antisense strategies have been useful in elucidating the electrophysiological properties of nAChRs in different tissues. Use of knock-out mice lacking individual nAChR subunits has also begun to elucidate how nicotine exerts its actions from the molecular level to the behavioral level. Experiments using mice lacking the beta2 subunit of the nAChR have shown that binding of nicotine to receptors containing this subunit is the first step in a pathway leading to increased dopamine levels in the mesolimbic dopamine system, and ultimately to the behavioral effects of nicotine in a test of nicotine reinforcement. Mice deficient in various alpha subunits of the nAChR will identify the partners of beta2 mediating the addictive properties of nicotine. In addition, more data needs to be gathered on the electrophysiological properties of different subunit combinations, the effects of nicotine on different neurotransmitter systems and the links between the molecular biology of nicotine receptors, their physiology and the ultimate role of individual receptor subtypes in complex behaviors. Multidisciplinary approaches to nAChR function will be essential to answering these questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Picciotto
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06508, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Picciotto MR, Caldarone BJ, Brunzell DH, Zachariou V, Stevens TR, King SL. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit knockout mice: physiological and behavioral phenotypes and possible clinical implications. Pharmacol Ther 2001; 92:89-108. [PMID: 11916531 DOI: 10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00161-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the muscle, autonomic ganglia, and brain are targets for pharmacologically administered nicotine. Several of the subunits that combine to form neuronal nicotinic receptors have been deleted by knockout or mutated by knockin in mice using homologous recombination. We will review the biochemical, pharmacological, anatomical, physiological, and behavioral phenotypes of mice with genetically altered neuronal nAChR subunits. Clinically relevant mutations in nAChR genes will also be discussed. In addition, some of the signal transduction pathways activated through nAChRs will be described in order to delineate the longer-term changes that might result from persistent activation or inactivation of nAChRs. Genetically manipulated mice have greatly increased our understanding of the subunit composition and physiological properties of nAChRs in vivo. In addition, these mice have provided a model system to determine the molecular basis for many of the pharmacological actions of nicotine on neurotransmitter release and behavior. Genetic manipulations in mice have also elucidated the role of nAChR subunits in various disease states, and suggest several avenues for drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Picciotto
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, 3rd Floor Research, New Haven, CT 06508, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Labarca C, Schwarz J, Deshpande P, Schwarz S, Nowak MW, Fonck C, Nashmi R, Kofuji P, Dang H, Shi W, Fidan M, Khakh BS, Chen Z, Bowers BJ, Boulter J, Wehner JM, Lester HA. Point mutant mice with hypersensitive alpha 4 nicotinic receptors show dopaminergic deficits and increased anxiety. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:2786-91. [PMID: 11226318 PMCID: PMC30217 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.041582598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Knock-in mice were generated that harbored a leucine-to-serine mutation in the alpha4 nicotinic receptor near the gate in the channel pore. Mice with intact expression of this hypersensitive receptor display dominant neonatal lethality. These mice have a severe deficit of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, possibly because the hypersensitive receptors are continuously activated by normal extracellular choline concentrations. A strain that retains the neo selection cassette in an intron has reduced expression of the hypersensitive receptor and is viable and fertile. The viable mice display increased anxiety, poor motor learning, excessive ambulation that is eliminated by very low levels of nicotine, and a reduction of nigrostriatal dopaminergic function upon aging. These knock-in mice provide useful insights into the pathophysiology of sustained nicotinic receptor activation and may provide a model for Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Labarca
- Division of Biology 156-29, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Caldarone BJ, Duman CH, Picciotto MR. Fear conditioning and latent inhibition in mice lacking the high affinity subclass of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain. Neuropharmacology 2000; 39:2779-84. [PMID: 11044747 DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00137-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Nicotine can enhance performance in several tests of cognition but the specific nicotinic receptor subtypes mediating these effects are largely unknown. Knock out mice lacking the beta2 subunit of the nicotinic receptor were evaluated in fear conditioning and latent inhibition tasks to begin to determine which receptor subtypes mediate the cognitive effects of nicotine. Young (2-4 months) knock out and wild type mice did not differ in either contextual or tone-conditioned fear, but aged (9-20 months) knock out males were impaired in freezing to both context and tone compared to aged wild type males. No differences in fear conditioning were observed between aged knock out and wild type females. Latent inhibition of fear to a pre-exposed tone, as measured by behavioral freezing, was also assessed. Both knock out and wild type mice displayed similar levels of latent inhibition, although overall levels of freezing were lower in knock out mice. These results support a previous study showing spatial learning deficits in aged beta2 subunit knock out mice [EMBO J. 18 (1999) 1235] and suggest that performance of other cognitive tasks may not be influenced by absence of beta2 subunit-containing receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J Caldarone
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06508, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Weiland S, Bertrand D, Leonard S. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from the gene to the disease. Behav Brain Res 2000; 113:43-56. [PMID: 10942031 DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00199-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are excitatory ligand-gated channels. Widely expressed throughout the peripheral and central nervous system, their properties depend upon their subunit composition. Furthermore, genetic studies have revealed a high degree of variation at the genomic level and alternative splicing of the mRNAs coding for these integral membrane proteins. In particular, genes coding for alpha4 and alpha7 subunits harbour a high degree of polymorphisms. Although well characterised at their molecular and functional level, the role of these receptors in the central nervous system remains obscure. Despite accumulating evidence for the participation of nicotinic receptors in disorders of the central nervous system including nicotinic addiction, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and Tourette's syndrome, the exact role of these receptors is still speculative. Because most of these phenotypes are complex and genetically heterogeneous, the investigation is difficult. However, in the past few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the contribution of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to the origin of epilepsies and schizophrenia. By concentrating on the latest results gained for these diseases, we discuss in this review the possible relationships between neuronal nicotinic receptors and neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Weiland
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, CMU, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Arias HR. Localization of agonist and competitive antagonist binding sites on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neurochem Int 2000; 36:595-645. [PMID: 10771117 DOI: 10.1016/s0197-0186(99)00154-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Identification of all residues involved in the recognition and binding of cholinergic ligands (e.g. agonists, competitive antagonists, and noncompetitive agonists) is a primary objective to understand which structural components are related to the physiological function of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). The picture for the localization of the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites is now clearer in the light of newer and better experimental evidence. These sites are located mainly on both alpha subunits in a pocket approximately 30-35 A above the surface membrane. Since both alpha subunits are identical, the observed high and low affinity for different ligands on the receptor is conditioned by the interaction of the alpha subunit with other non-alpha subunits. This molecular interaction takes place at the interface formed by the different subunits. For example, the high-affinity acetylcholine (ACh) binding site of the muscle-type AChR is located on the alphadelta subunit interface, whereas the low-affinity ACh binding site is located on the alphagamma subunit interface. Regarding homomeric AChRs (e.g. alpha7, alpha8, and alpha9), up to five binding sites may be located on the alphaalpha subunit interfaces. From the point of view of subunit arrangement, the gamma subunit is in between both alpha subunits and the delta subunit follows the alpha aligned in a clockwise manner from the gamma. Although some competitive antagonists such as lophotoxin and alpha-bungarotoxin bind to the same high- and low-affinity sites as ACh, other cholinergic drugs may bind with opposite specificity. For instance, the location of the high- and the low-affinity binding site for curare-related drugs as well as for agonists such as the alkaloid nicotine and the potent analgesic epibatidine (only when the AChR is in the desensitized state) is determined by the alphagamma and the alphadelta subunit interface, respectively. The case of alpha-conotoxins (alpha-CoTxs) is unique since each alpha-CoTx from different species is recognized by a specific AChR type. In addition, the specificity of alpha-CoTxs for each subunit interface is species-dependent. In general terms we may state that both alpha subunits carry the principal component for the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites, whereas the non-alpha subunits bear the complementary component. Concerning homomeric AChRs, both the principal and the complementary component exist on the alpha subunit. The principal component on the muscle-type AChR involves three loops-forming binding domains (loops A-C). Loop A (from mouse sequence) is mainly formed by residue Y(93), loop B is molded by amino acids W(149), Y(152), and probably G(153), while loop C is shaped by residues Y(190), C(192), C(193), and Y(198). The complementary component corresponding to each non-alpha subunit probably contributes with at least four loops. More specifically, the loops at the gamma subunit are: loop D which is formed by residue K(34), loop E that is designed by W(55) and E(57), loop F which is built by a stretch of amino acids comprising L(109), S(111), C(115), I(116), and Y(117), and finally loop G that is shaped by F(172) and by the negatively-charged amino acids D(174) and E(183). The complementary component on the delta subunit, which corresponds to the high-affinity ACh binding site, is formed by homologous loops. Regarding alpha-neurotoxins, several snake and alpha-CoTxs bear specific residues that are energetically coupled with their corresponding pairs on the AChR binding site. The principal component for snake alpha-neurotoxins is located on the residue sequence alpha1W(184)-D(200), which includes loop C. In addition, amino acid sequence 55-74 from the alpha1 subunit (which includes loop E), and residues gammaL(119) (close to loop F) and gammaE(176) (close to loop G) at the low-affinity binding site, or deltaL(121) (close to the homologous region of loop G) at the high-affinity binding site, are i
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H R Arias
- Instituto de Matemática de Bahía Blanca, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Universidad Nacional del Sur, Av. Alem 1253, 8000 Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The potent behavioral and cognitive effects of nicotine highlight the physiological importance of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). These receptors are part of the superfamily of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels that are responsible for rapid intercellular communication. Molecular cloning of the protein subunits that make up these receptors has led to greater understanding of the pharmacology and physiology of nAChRs. This review outlines our current understanding of the molecular constituents of these receptors and some of the recent studies of the structural determinants of receptors function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S McGehee
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Léna C, Changeux JP. The role of beta 2-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain explored with a mutant mouse. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 868:611-6. [PMID: 10414341 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11333.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Neuronal nicotinic receptors comprise a family of pentameric oligomers made up of a combination of 10 different subunits. The beta 2 subunit has the widest pattern of expression in the brain and is thus likely to form a significant fraction of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Using mice lacking the beta 2 subunit, we have shown that nAChRs containing this subunit are responsible for most of the high-affinity binding sites for nicotine, cytisine, and epibatidine in the brain. Functional receptors containing the beta 2-subunit are found in the somatodendritic compartment as well as the axonal compartment of neurons. We have examined the contribution of these receptors to the effects of nicotine on the mesolimbic DA system, which mediates the reinforcing properties of many addictive drugs (including nicotine). Submicromolar doses of nicotine, corresponding to the concentrations of nicotine in vivo in self-administration paradigms, increased the firing rate of dopaminergic neurons in vitro in normal mice but not in mice lacking the beta 2 subunit. Consistently, systemic injection of nicotine induced an increase in extracellular dopamine in normal mice but not in mutant mice, and nicotine self-administration was reduced or suppressed in mutant mice. These data support the view that the beta 2-containing receptors are involved in mediating the reinforcing properties of nicotine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Léna
- Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire-CNRS UA D1284, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Changeux JP, Bertrand D, Corringer PJ, Dehaene S, Edelstein S, Léna C, Le Novère N, Marubio L, Picciotto M, Zoli M. Brain nicotinic receptors: structure and regulation, role in learning and reinforcement. BRAIN RESEARCH. BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS 1998; 26:198-216. [PMID: 9651527 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00040-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The introduction, in the late sixties, of the concepts and methods of molecular biology to the study of the nervous system had a profound impact on the field, primarily through the identification of its basic molecular components. These structures include, for example, the elementary units of the synapse: neurotransmitters, neuropeptides and their receptors, but also ionic channels, intracellular second messengers and the relevant enzymes, cell surface adhesion molecules, or growth and trophic factors [21,78,81, 52,79]. Attempts to establish appropriate causal relationships between these molecular components, the actual organisation of neural networks, and a defined behavior, nevertheless, still must overcome many difficulties. A first problem is the recognition of the minimum levels of organisation, from the molecular, cellular, or multicellular (circuit) to the higher cognitive levels, that determine the given physiological and/or behavioral performance under investigation. A common difficulty (and potential source of errors of interpretation) is to relate a cognitive function to a network organization which does not possess the required structural complexity and vice-versa. Another problem is to distinguish, among the components of the system, those which are actually necessary and those which, taken together, suffice for a given behavior to take place. Identification of such a minimal set of building blocks may receive decisive insights from the elaboration of neurally plausible formal models that bring together, within a single and coherent 'artificial organism', the neuronal network, the circulating activity, and the behavior they determine (see [42,43,45,72,30]). In this communication, we shall attempt, still in a preliminary fashion, to bring together: (1) our recent knowledge on the molecular biology of brain nicotinic receptors (nAChRs) and their allosteric properties and (2) integrated behaviors, such as cognitive learning, investigated for instance with delayed-response or passive avoidance tasks that are likely to involve nAChRs in particular at the level of reinforcement (or reward) mechanisms (see [18,29,135]).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Changeux
- Neurobiologie Moléculaire, CNRS URA 1284, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex 15, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|