The influence of a combined oral contraceptive pill and menstrual cycle phase on digital microvascular haemodynamics

Impact of hormone replacement therapy on microvascular function in healthy and Type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women

AIMS

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been previously reported to modulate vascular function and cardiovascular risk. Its impact on the macrocirculation has previously been explored, however, little data is available on its impact on the microcirculation. This study aimed to determine the impact of HRT on microvascular function in healthy and Type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women (n=20 and 17, respectively).

METHODS

Microvascular function was assessed by skin maximum hyperaemia, skin hyperaemic response to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine (endothelial-dependent vasodilator) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelial-independent vasodilator), capillary pressure and the microvascular filtration capacity. Microvascular assessments were carried out at baseline and repeated following 6 months' oral hormone replacement therapy (1 mg oestradiol/0.5 mg norethisterone or 1 mg unopposed oestradiol for hysterectomized women).

RESULTS

Following 6 months' therapy there were no significant changes in microvascular assessments in the healthy women. In the diabetic women there was a reduction in the skin hyperaemic response to acetylcholine [median pretreatment peak response: 1.95 (25th, 75th centiles: 1.54, 2.30) V vs. post-treatment peak response: 1.53 (1.30, 1.91) V (P=0.011, Wilcoxon's signed rank test)] and sodium nitroprusside [median peak response 1.59 (1.37, 1.99) vs. 1.35 (0.92, 1.63) V (P=0.011)] with HRT, but no other changes.

CONCLUSION

These data suggests that HRT does not affect microvascular function in healthy women, but adversely affects it in diabetic women. These findings may help to explain why HRT fails to provide the predicted cardiovascular protection, and raises the possibility that HRT influences microangiopathy progression in diabetic women.

Seasonal differences in finger skin temperature and microvascular blood flow in healthy men and women are exaggerated in women with primary Raynaud's phenomenon

AIMS

Patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon (PRP) have more severe symptoms in the winter. The aetiology of this is more complex than simply increased vasoconstriction in response to the immediate ambient temperature. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in skin temperature (Tsk), microvascular blood flow and responses to endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilators in healthy controls, and women with PRP under identical environmental temperatures but in different seasons.

METHODS

Ten women with PRP were compared with age matched women (10) and men (10). Finger skin responses were recorded immediately on arrival, after stabilizing in a temperature regulated laboratory at 22-24 degrees C, and at matched warm (35 degrees C) and cold (15 degrees C) Tsk in the winter and summer. Baseline red blood cell flux (r.b.c. flux), and the change in flux in response to iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were recorded by laser Doppler fluxmetry at the warm and cold Tsk.

RESULTS

Arrival Tsk were significantly cooler for all subjects during the winter (mean seasonal difference -2.6 degrees C, P < 0.0001), and markedly colder in subjects with PRP (mean seasonal difference -3.5 degrees C, P < 0.0005). Statistically significant seasonal differences persisted in all subjects at stable Tsk despite an identical laboratory temperature (mean difference 1.3 degrees C, P < 0.0001). To achieve comparable controlled finger Tsk a significantly colder local environment was required for male controls (mean of -2.1 degrees C, P < 0.0001), and a significantly warmer environment for subjects with PRP (mean of + 2.4 degrees C, P < 0.0001) compared with female controls. This needed to be warmer in the winter, by a mean of 2.4 degrees C, than the summer for all subjects. Vasodilatation in response to ACh, but not SNP, was significantly smaller (P < 0.0001) in the PRP group compared with the female controls for all visits, with most of this difference arising in the winter visits (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a seasonal and persistent influence on finger Tsk, and microvascular blood flow in healthy men and women, which modifies the observed responses to immediate changes in finger Tsk. The seasonal differences are greater in women than men, and are further exaggerated in women with PRP, in whom this is associated with reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.