• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
  • Find an Author
Download
For: Sun JC, Skinner MW, Liu SY, Huang TS. Effect of speech processor program modifications on cochlear implant recipients' threshold and maximum acceptable loudness levels. Am J Audiol 1999;8:128-36. [PMID: 10646196 DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(1999/015)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Fayed EA, Zaghloul HS, Morgan AE. Electrode impedance changes over time in MED El cochlear implant children recipients: Relation to stimulation levels and behavioral measures. Cochlear Implants Int 2020;21:192-197. [DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1716464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
2
Gajadeera EA, Galvin KL, Dowell RC, Busby PA. The Change in Electrical Stimulation Levels During 24 Months Postimplantation for a Large Cohort of Adults Using the Nucleus® Cochlear Implant: . Ear Hear 2017;38:357-67. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
3
Telmesani LM, Said NM. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82:28-33. [PMID: 26857311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2015] [Revised: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 12/31/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
4
Domville-lewis C, Santa Maria PL, Upson G, Chester-browne R, Atlas MD. Psychophysical Map Stability in Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: Comparing Current Audiology Methods to a New Statistical Definition. Ear Hear 2015;36:497-504. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
5
Walravens ELS, Mawman D, O'driscoll M. Changes in psychophysical parameters during the first month of programming the Nucleus Contour and Contour Advance cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;7:15-32. [DOI: 10.1179/cim.2006.7.1.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
6
Lee Y, Jeong SW, Kim LS. MAP optimization as a predictor of cochlear implant outcomes in children with narrow internal auditory canal. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:1591-7. [PMID: 22874590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2012] [Revised: 07/13/2012] [Accepted: 07/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
7
Skinner MW. Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;191:4-13. [PMID: 14533838 DOI: 10.1177/00034894031120s903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
8
Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M. Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:873-80. [PMID: 12880667 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(03)00131-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
9
Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M. Changes over time in the psycho-electric parameters in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 2003;42:274-8. [PMID: 12916700 DOI: 10.3109/14992020309078346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA