A case study of psychogenic hoarseness

The role of psychogenic and psychosocial factors in the development of functional voice disorders

The primary objective of this discussion paper is to review the available evidence for the role of psychogenic and psychosocial factors in the development of functional voice disorders (FVD). Current theoretical models linking these factors to the aetiology of FVD and to vocal hyperfunction are then considered. Since there is a paucity of solid empirical evidence to date, general patterns of evidence derived from single case reports and case series are examined first, followed by those empirical studies using more sophisticated methodologies. The discussion is structured around a framework that includes the following psychosocial areas of enquiry: demographic profiles of individuals with FVD; stressful incidents preceding onset; personality traits; coping styles and psychiatric disorder. Current evidence and associated theoretical models suggest that cognitive, affective, neurophysiological and behavioural aspects culminate in the development of these complex voice disorders. The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to clinical practice and clinical training, with suggestions for future scientific research.

Psychogenic voice disorders--heroes or hysterics? A brief overview with questions and discussion

A brief overview of the field in relation to psychogenic voice disorders is given with reference to past and present terminology used, the common presentations seen, followed by the more subtle or ambiguous examples which may challenge our notions of psychogenic or clear-cut functional versus organic dichotomies. Issues related to aetiology, personality and psychological correlates are discussed, and a number of questions regarding the phenomenology of psychogenic dysphonia and its therapeutic resolution are raised. Since prevalence continues to be significantly in favour of women, it is suggested psychogenic voice disorder as a feminist issue might be worthy of our further consideration.

Treatment efficacy: voice disorders

This article reviews the literature on the efficacy of treatment for voice disorders primarily using studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Voice disorders are defined, their frequency of occurrence across the life span is reported, and their impact on the lives of individuals with voice disorders is documented. The goal of voice treatment is to maximize vocal effectiveness given the existing disorder and to reduce the handicapping effect of the voice problem. Voice treatment may be (a) the preferred treatment to resolve the voice disorder when medical (surgical or pharmacological) treatments are not indicated; (b) the initial treatment in cases where medical treatment appears indicated; it may obviate the need for medical treatment; (c) completed before and after surgical treatment to maximize long-term post-surgical voice; and (d) a preventative treatment to preserve vocal health. Experimental and clinical data are reviewed that support these roles applied to various disorder types: (a) vocal misuse, hyperfunction and muscular imbalance (frequently resulting in edema, vocal nodules, polyps or contact ulcers); (b) medical or physical conditions (e.g., laryngeal nerve trauma, Parkinson disease); and (c) psychogenic disorders (e.g., conversion reactions, personality disorders). Directions for future research are suggested which maximize clinical outcomes and scientific rigor to enhance knowledge on the efficacy of voice treatment.