Review article: pharmacological options in achalasia

An overview of the efficacy, safety, and predictors of achalasia treatments

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by abnormal esophageal peristalsis and the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax, resulting in poor esophageal emptying. This can be relieved by endoscopic and surgical treatments; each comes with certain advantages and disadvantages.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to guide the clinician in clinical decision making on the different treatment options for achalasia regarding the efficacy, safety, and important predictors.

EXPERT OPINION

Botulinum toxin injection is only recommended for a selective group of achalasia patients because of the short term effect. Pneumatic dilation improves achalasia symptoms, but this effect diminishes over time and requiring repeated dilations to maintain clinical effect. Heller myotomy combined with fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy are highly effective on the long term but are more invasive than dilations. Gastro-esophageal reflux complaints are more often encountered after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and type of achalasia must be taken into account when choosing a treatment. The preference of the patient is also of great importance and therefore shared decision making has to play a fundamental role in deciding about treatment.

Achalasia: Current therapeutic options

Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and absent peristalsis in the smooth muscle esophageal body. As a result, patients typically experience dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. Over the past 10-15 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the evaluation of therapies for achalasia. Unfortunately, little progress in the development of effective pharmacological treatments has been made. Botulinum toxin injection provides some relief of symptoms in many patients but requires periodic reinjection that may provide progressively less benefit over time. There are now three well-established, safe, and effective therapies for the treatment of achalasia: pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) which can lead to marked symptom improvement in most patients. Each treatment has a specific constellation of risks, benefits, and recurrence rate. The first-line treatment used will depend on patient preference, achalasia subtype, and local expertise. The recent impressive advances in both the art and science of achalasia therapy are explored with a comprehensive review of the various treatment modalities and comparative controlled clinical trials. In addition, key technical pearls of the procedural treatments are demonstrated.

Achalasia, from diagnosis to treatment

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder and is characterized by alterations of the motility of the esophageal body in conjunction with altered lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. The clinical presentation of patients with achalasia may be complex; however, the most frequent symptom is dysphagia. The management of patients with achalasia is often challenging, due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation.

AREAS COVERED

The diagnosis and management of achalasia has significantly improved in the last years due to the growing availability of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the implementation in the therapeutic armamentarium of new therapeutic endoscopic procedures. Traditional therapeutic strategies include botulinum toxin injected to the LES and pneumatic balloon dilation. On the other hand, surgical treatments contemplate laparoscopic Heller myotomy and, less frequently, esophagectomy. Furthermore, in the last few years, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been proposed as the main endoscopic therapeutic alternative to the laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnosis and treatment of achalasia still represent a challenging area. However, we believe that an accurate up-front evaluation is, nowadays, necessary in addressing patients with achalasia for a more accurate diagnosis as well as for the best treatment options.

Achalasia

Achalasia is a rare disorder of the oesophageal smooth muscle characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and absent or spastic contractions in the oesophageal body. The key pathophysiological mechanism is loss of inhibitory nerve function that probably results from an autoimmune attack targeting oesophageal myenteric nerves through cell-mediated and, possibly, antibody-mediated mechanisms. Achalasia incidence and prevalence increase with age, but the disorder can affect all ages and both sexes. Cardinal symptoms consist of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain and weight loss. Several years can pass between symptom onset and an achalasia diagnosis. Evaluation starts with endoscopy to rule out structural causes, followed by high-resolution manometry and/or barium radiography. Functional lumen imaging probe can provide complementary evidence. Achalasia subtypes have management and prognostic implications. Although symptom questionnaires are not useful for diagnosis, the Eckardt score is a simple symptom scoring scale that helps to quantify symptom response to therapy. Oral pharmacotherapy is not particularly effective. Botulinum toxin injection into the LES can temporize symptoms and function as a bridge to definitive therapy. Pneumatic dilation, per-oral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic Heller myotomy can provide durable symptom benefit. End-stage achalasia with a dilated, non-functioning oesophagus may require oesophagectomy or enteral feeding into the stomach. Long-term complications can, rarely, include oesophageal cancer, but surveillance recommendations have not been established.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Dysphagia is a common symptom with significant impact on quality of life. Our diagnostic armamentarium was primarily limited to endoscopy and barium esophagram until the advent of manometric techniques in the 1970s, which provided the first reliable tool for assessment of esophageal motor function. Since that time, significant advances have been made over the last 3 decades in our understanding of various esophageal motility disorders due to improvement in diagnostics with high-resolution esophageal manometry. High-resolution esophageal manometry has improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia and has also enhanced our understanding of spastic and hypomotility disorders of the esophageal body. In this review, we discuss the current approach to diagnosis and therapeutics of various esophageal motility disorders.

Long-term Efficacy of Combined Treatment in Patients with Idiopathic Achalasia

BACKGROUND Several treatment strategies are available to treat achalasia. Although combined therapy has been used for several years, there are limited data on long-term outcomes. We aimed to determine its long-term efficacy in patients who were resistant or those with rapid relapse. METHODS In this prospective study, we reviewed the records of 1100 patients with achalasia, who were candidates for pneumatic balloon dilatation (PBD) in our center from 1996 to 2018. We enrolled 197 patients resistant to initial treatment or with rapid relapse of symptoms after three sessions of PBD. Clinical evaluation and time barium esophagogram (TBE) were done before treatment, a month afterward, and when clinical symptoms increased in order to confirm relapse, and at the end of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 168 patients accepted combined therapy. The mean duration of follow-up was 9.04 years. Achalasia symptom score (ASS) dropped from 10.82 to 3.62 a month after treatment and was 3.09 at the end of the follow-up (p = 0.0001 and 0.001). TBE had a decrease in mean height of barium one month after treatment (9.23 vs. 5.10, p = 0.001), and this reduction persisted until the end of follow-up (3.39, p = 0.001). Vantrappen score at the end of the follow-up showed 56 patients in excellent, 51 in good, 33 in moderate, and 14 in poor condition (89% acceptable response rate). CONCLUSION Our results showed the long-term efficacy of combined treatment in patients with achalasia who otherwise had to undergo a high-risk and costly procedure, which makes it a safe and effective alternative for myotomy.

Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Achalasia: Who to Treat and How?

Achalasia is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by failure of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and altered motility of the esophagus. The traditional, highly effective, surgical approach to relieve obstruction at the LES includes cardiomyotomy. Fundoplication is added to decrease risk of postoperative reflux. Per oral endoscopic myotomy is a new endoscopic procedure that allows division of the LES via transoral route. It has several advantages including less invasiveness, cosmesis, and tailored approach to the length on the myotomy. However, it is associated with increased rate of post-procedural reflux. Various endoscopic interventions are used to address this problem.

2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines

Esophageal achalasia is a primary motility disorder characterized by insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and loss of esophageal peristalsis. Achalasia is a chronic disease that causes progressive irreversible loss of esophageal motor function. The recent development of high-resolution manometry has facilitated the diagnosis of achalasia, and determining the achalasia subtypes based on high-resolution manometry can be important when deciding on treatment methods. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is less invasive than surgery with comparable efficacy. The present guidelines (the "2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines") were developed based on evidence-based medicine; the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association and Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility served as the operating and development committees, respectively. The development of the guidelines began in June 2018, and a draft consensus based on the Delphi process was achieved in April 2019. The guidelines consist of 18 recommendations: 2 pertaining to the definition and epidemiology of achalasia, 6 pertaining to diagnoses, and 10 pertaining to treatments. The endoscopic treatment section is based on the latest evidence from meta-analyses. Clinicians (including gastroenterologists, upper gastrointestinal tract surgeons, general physicians, nurses, and other hospital workers) and patients could use these guidelines to make an informed decision on the management of achalasia.

The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines

Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.

Management of achalasia cardia: Expert consensus statements

Achalasia cardia (AC) is a frequently encountered motility disorder of the esophagus resulting from an irreversible degeneration of neurons. Treatment modalities are palliative in nature, and there is no curative treatment available for AC as of now. Significant advancements have been made in the management of AC over last decade. The introduction of high resolution manometry and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has strengthened the diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium of AC. High resolution manometry allows for the characterization of the type of achalasia, which in turn has important therapeutic implications. The endoscopic management of AC has been reinforced with the introduction of POEM that has been found to be highly effective and safe in palliating the symptoms in short-term to mid-term follow-up studies. POEM is less invasive than Heller's myotomy and provides the endoscopist with the opportunity of adjusting the length and orientation of esophageal myotomy according to the type of AC. The management of achalasia needs to be tailored for each patient, and the role of pneumatic balloon dilatation, POEM, or Heller's myotomy needs to be revisited. In this review, we discuss the important aspects of diagnosis as well as management of AC. The statements presented in the manuscript reflect the cumulative efforts of an expert consensus group.

Long-term outcomes of Heller's myotomy and balloon dilatation in childhood achalasia

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder: its optimal treatment in children is still a matter of debate. Records of children treated for achalasia, over an 18-year period, were reviewed.Forty-eight children (median age at diagnosis 10 years; range 3-17 years) were identified. Twenty-eight patients were initially treated with Heller's myotomy (HM) and 20 with balloon dilatation (BD). At last follow-up (median 3 years; range 1-5.5 years), 43.8% (21/48) of children were symptom free. The number of asymptomatic children was significantly higher among those treated initially with HM compared to BD (HM 15/28, 53.6% BD 6/20, 30%, p < 0.05). All children who underwent BD required HM due to symptom recurrence. The median (range) total number of procedures was significantly higher in the BD group (BD 3 (1-7); HM 1 (1-5); p < 0.05) with a shorter time to the second intervention (BD 14 months, 95%CI 4-24; HM 58 months, 95%CI 38-79; p < 0.05). Of 108 procedures, esophageal perforation occurred in two children after HM (two out of 48 HM procedures in total, 4%) and one child after BD (1/60, 1.7%).

CONCLUSION

Less than half of children with achalasia are symptom free after initial treatment with either BD or HM. HM, however, when performed as first procedure, provided longer symptom-free period and reduced need for subsequent intervention. What is Known: • Balloon dilatation (BD) and Heller's myotomy (HM) are safe and effective treatment options for achalasia. • Controversy, however, exists regarding the most effective initial therapeutic approach. What is New: • HM with or without fundoplication may represent the initial therapeutic approach of choice. • Initial BD may negatively affect the outcome of a subsequent HM.

Pharmacotherapy for the management of achalasia: Current status, challenges and future directions

This article reviews currently available pharmacological options available for the treatment of achalasia, with a special focus on the role of botulinum toxin (BT) injection due to its superior therapeutic effect and side effect profile. The discussion on BT includes the role of different BT serotypes, better pharmacological formulations, improved BT injection techniques, the use of sprouting inhibitors, designer recombinant BT formulations and alternative substances used in endoscopic injections. The large body of ongoing research into achalasia and BT may provide a stronger role for BT injection as a form of minimally invasive, cost effective and efficacious form of therapy for patients with achalasia. The article also explores current issues and future research avenues that may prove beneficial in improving the efficacy of pharmacological treatment approaches in patients with achalasia.

Current Therapeutic Options for Esophageal Motor Disorders as Defined by the Chicago Classification

With the development of high-resolution manometry and specific metrics to characterize esophageal motility, the Chicago Classification has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders. Major and significant disorders, that is, never observed in healthy subjects, are achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, distal esophageal spasm, absent peristalsis, and hypercontractile (Jackhammer) esophagus. Achalasia subtyping is relevant to predict the response to endoscopic and surgical therapies as several studies suggest that, pneumatic dilation is less effective than Heller myotomy, in type III achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy, initially developed in expert centers, is a promising technique for the treatment of achalasia. The medical therapeutic options for distal esophageal spasm and hypercontractile esophagus are smooth muscle relaxants and pain modulators. Intraesophageal injection of botulinum toxin might be an interesting option for treatment of these disorders but further studies are required to determine the optimal injection protocol and the best candidates based on manometric patterns. The treatment of hypotensive motility disorders is disappointing and relies mainly on dietary and lifestyle changes as no effective esophageal prokinetic is currently available.

Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an oesophageal motility disorder, of unknown cause, which results in increased lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone and symptoms of difficulty swallowing. Treatments are aimed at reducing the LOS tone. Current endoscopic therapeutic options include pneumatic dilation (PD) or botulinum toxin (BTX) injection.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake a systematic review comparing the efficacy and safety of two endoscopic treatments, PD and intrasphincteric BTX injection, in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia.

SEARCH METHODS

Trials were initially identified by searching MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980 to September 2008), ISI Web of Science (1955 to September 2008), The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008.  Searches in all databases were conducted in October 2005 and updated in September 2008 and April 2014. The Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy for identifying randomised trials in MEDLINE, sensitivity maximising version in the Ovid format, was combined with specific search terms to identify randomised controlled trials in MEDLINE. The MEDLINE search strategy was adapted for use in the other databases that were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing PD to BTX injection in individuals with primary achalasia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study quality assessment and data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies involving 178 participants were included. Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis of remission rates on the basis of clinical heterogeneity of the initial endoscopic protocols. There was no significant difference between PD or BTX treatment in remission within four weeks of the initial intervention; with a risk ratio of remission of 1.11 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.27). There was also no significant difference in the mean oesophageal pressures between the treatment groups; with a weighted mean difference for PD of -0.77 (95% CI -2.44 to 0.91, P = 0.37). Data on remission rates following the initial endoscopic treatment were available for three studies at six months and four studies at 12 months. At six months 46 of 57 PD participants were in remission compared to 29 of 56 in the BTX group, giving a risk ratio of 1.57 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.08, P = 0.0015); whilst at 12 months 55 of 75 PD participants were in remission compared to 27 of 72 BTX participants, with a risk ratio of 1.88 (95% CI 1.35 to 2.61, P = 0.0002). No serious adverse outcomes occurred in participants receiving BTX, whilst PD was complicated by perforation in three cases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that PD is the more effective endoscopic treatment in the long term (greater than six months) for patients with achalasia.

Treatment of esophageal motility disorders based on the chicago classification

OPINION STATEMENT

The Chicago Classification divides esophageal motor disorders based on the recorded value of the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). The first group includes those with an elevated mean IRP that is associated with peristaltic abnormalities such as achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. The second group includes those with a normal mean IRP that is associated with esophageal hypermotility disorders such as distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus (jackhammer esophagus), and hypertensive peristalsis (nutcracker esophagus). The third group includes those with a normal mean IRP that is associated with esophageal hypomotility peristaltic abnormalities such as absent peristalsis, weak peristalsis with small or large breaks, and frequent failed peristalsis. The therapeutic options vary greatly between the different groups of esophageal motor disorders. In achalasia patients, potential treatment strategies comprise medical therapy (calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors), endoscopic procedures (botulinum toxin A injection, pneumatic dilation, or peroral endoscopic myotomy) or surgery (Heller myotomy). Patients with a normal IRP and esophageal hypermotility disorder are candidates for medical therapy (nitrates, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, cimetropium/ipratropium bromide, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors), endoscopic procedures (botulinum toxin A injection and peroral endoscopic myotomy), or surgery (Heller myotomy). Lastly, in patients with a normal IRP and esophageal hypomotility disorder, treatment is primarily focused on controlling the presence of gastroesophageal reflux with proton pump inhibitors and lifestyle modifications (soft and liquid diet and eating in the upright position) to address patient's dysphagia.

Zenker's diverticulum complicating achalasia: a 'cup-and-spill' oesophagus

A 72-year-old woman presented with long-standing gastro-oesophageal reflux, regurgitation of swallowed food and worsening cervical dysphagia. Fluoroscopic barium oesophagography revealed a posterolateral pharyngeal pouch (Zenker's diverticulum (ZD)) complicating a 'cup and spill' oesophageal deformity with a smoothly tapered segment at the gastro-oesophageal junction. CT and high-resolution manometry confirmed that the underlying abnormality was a massively dilated oesophagus with aperistalsis and pan-oesophageal pressurisation, consistent with a diagnosis of oesophageal achalasia (type II). She underwent endoscopic stapled diverticulotomy, with good symptomatic relief. We discuss the aetiology of ZD, its management and the association here with oesophageal achalasia.

The management of esophageal achalasia: from diagnosis to surgical treatment

The goal of this review is to illustrate our approach to patients with achalasia in terms of preoperative evaluation and surgical technique. Indications, patient selection and management are herein discussed. Specifically, we illustrate the pathogenetic theories and diagnostic algorithm with current up-to-date techniques to diagnose achalasia and its manometric variants. Finally, we focus on the therapeutic approaches available today: medical and surgical. A special emphasis is given on the surgical treatment of achalasia and we provide the reader with a detailed description of our pre and postoperative management.

Achalasia cardia with esophageal varix managed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection

Achalasia cardia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by failure of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Nitrates and calcium channel blockers, pneumatic dilatation, botulinum toxin injection and surgical myotomy have been described in literature as possible management options. We present a patient who presented with achalasia and was co-incidentally diagnosed to have cryptogenic cirrhosis with portal hypertension and had esophageal varices. This clinical combination precluded the use of pneumatic dilatation and surgical myotomy. We injected botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter using a celiac plexus neurolysis needle under endoscopic ultrasound guidance; the clinical response was good.

Achalasia: a review of Western and Iranian experiences

Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the esophagus, in which esophageal emptying is impaired. Diagnosis of achalasia is based on clinical findings. The diagnosis is confirmed by radiographic, endoscopic, and manometric evaluations. Several treatments for achalasia have been introduced. We searched the PubMed Database for original articles and meta-analyses about achalasia to summarize the current knowledge regarding this disease, with particular focus on different procedures that are used for treatment of achalasia. We also report the Iranian experience of treatment of this disease, since it could be considered as a model for medium-resource countries. Myotomy, particularly laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication, is the most effective treatment for achalasia. Compared to other treatments, however, the initial cost of myotomy is usually higher and the recovery period is longer. When performing myotomy is not indicated or not possible, graded pneumatic dilation with slow rate of balloon inflation seems to be an effective and safe initial alternative. Injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter before pneumatic dilation may increase remission rates. However, this needs to be confirmed in further studies. Due to lack of adequate information regarding the role of expandable stents in the treatment of achalasia, insertion of stents does not currently seem to be a recommended treatment. In summary, laparoscopic myotomy can be considered as the procedure of choice for treatment of achalasia. Graded pneumatic dilation is an effective alternative when the performance of myotomy is not possible for any reason.

Esophageal manometry in 28 systemic sclerosis Brazilian patients: findings and correlations

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem disease of unknown etiology. Esophageal involvement affects 50-90% of patients and is characterized by abnormal motility and hypotonic lower esophageal sphincter. Data on the association of esophageal abnormalities and age, gender, SSc subset or duration, autoantibody profile, esophageal symptoms, and medication are lacking or conflicting. The aim of this study was the evaluation of these associations in Brazilian sclerodermic patients from the Rheumatology Division, Clinics Hospital, Federal University, Minas Gerais. They underwent medical records review, clinical interview, and esophageal manometry. The normal cutoff level for lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 14 mmHg. Abnormal peristalsis occurred when less than 80% of peristaltic waves were propagated. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Twenty-eight patients were included: 71% were women. The population presented medium age and disease duration of 46 years and 12 years, respectively. Cutaneous diffuse SSc occurred in 39% and its limited form in 61%. Dysphagia, pyrosis, and regurgitation occurred, respectively, in 71%, 43%, and 61% of patients. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and number of peristaltic waves-propagated medias were, respectively, 17.2 mmHg and 2.3. SSc-related manometric abnormalities were present in 86% of patients. Manometry revealed distal esophageal body hypomotility, hypotonic lower esophageal sphincter, or both, respectively, in 82%, 39%, and 36% of patients. One patient presented the manometric pattern of esophageal achalasia. Male patients more frequently presented hypotonic inferior esophageal sphincter. Manometric findings have had no relationship with the other variables. Nifedipine use did not influence manometric findings.

Recurrent achalasia treated with Heller myotomy: A review of the literature

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Heller myotomy (HM) for recurrent achalasia, performed after different methods of first-line treatment.

METHODS: We searched for studies published in PubMed from 1966 to March 2008 on treatment of recurrent achalasia with HM after failure with different methods of first-line treatment. The efficacy of HM was assessed by a pooled estimate of response rate with individual studies weighted proportionally to sample size.

RESULTS: Sixteen studies were eligible and included in the review. The results showed that HM has a better remission rate for recurrent achalasia after failure of HM [weighted mean (SD)] of 86.9% (21.8%) compared with 81.6% (23.8%) for pneumatic dilatation (PD). One study evaluated the efficacy of HM after failure of PD combined with botulinum toxin injection (83%). The most common complications were perforation and gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSION: HM has the best efficacy in patients with recurrent achalasia who were treated with HM as first-line treatment. Future studies should focus on how to increase the success rate and decrease the complications of HM.

Calcium sensitization in human esophageal muscle: role for RhoA kinase in maintenance of lower esophageal sphincter tone

A rise in intracellular-free calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) concentration is important for initiating contraction of smooth muscles, and Ca(2+) sensitization involving RhoA kinase can sustain tension. We previously found that [Ca(2+)](i) was comparable in cells from the esophageal body (EB) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscles, despite the fact that the LES maintains resting tone. We hypothesized that Ca(2+) sensitization contributes to contraction in human esophageal muscle. Tension and [Ca(2+)](i) were measured simultaneously in intact human EB and LES muscles using the ratiometric Ca(2+)-sensitive dye fura-2. Spontaneous oscillations in EB muscle tension were associated with transient elevations of [Ca(2+)](i). Carbachol caused a large increase in tension, compared with spontaneous oscillations, although the rise of [Ca(2+)](i) was similar, suggesting Ca(2+) sensitization. The RhoA-kinase blockers (R)-(+)-trans-4-(1-aminoethyl)-N-(4-pyridyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide dihydrochloride monohydrate (Y-27632) and 1-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-homopiperazine hydrochloride (HA-1077) reduced carbachol- and nerve-evoked contraction of the EB, accompanied by smaller reduction in the rise of [Ca(2+)](i). Protein kinase C inhibitors reduced force to a lesser extent. RhoA-kinase blockers caused concentration-dependent reduction of tension in spontaneously contracted LES muscles. Moreover, RhoA-kinase blockers reduced intrinsic nerve-evoked and carbachol-evoked contraction. However, there was no effect on nerve- or nitric oxide-mediated relaxation of LES. Ca(2+) sensitization mediated by the RhoA-kinase pathway has an important role in contraction of human EB muscles and LES tonic contraction, a feature not previously recognized.

Review article: molecular, pathological and therapeutic features of human enteric neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Considerable information has been gathered on the functional organization of enteric neuronal circuitries regulating gastrointestinal motility. However, little is known about the neuropathophysiological mechanisms underlying gastrointestinal motor disorders.

AIM

To analyse the most important pathological findings, clinical implications and therapeutic management of idiopathic enteric neuropathies.

METHODS

PubMed searches were used to retrieve the literature inherent to molecular determinants, pathophysiological bases and therapeutics of gastrointestinal dysmotility, such as achalasia, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, Hirschsprung's disease and slow transit constipation, to unravel advances on digestive disorders resulting from enteric neuropathies.

RESULTS

Current data on molecular and pathological features of enteric neuropathies indicate that degenerative and inflammatory abnormalities can compromise the morpho-functional integrity of the enteric nervous system. These alterations lead to a massive impairment in gut transit and result in severe abdominal symptoms with associated high morbidity, poor quality of life for patients and established mortality. Many pathophysiological aspects of these severe conditions remain obscure, and therefore treatment options are quite limited and often unsatisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of enteric nervous system abnormalities provides a framework to better understand the pathological processes underlying gut dysmotility, to translate this knowledge into clinical management and to foster the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an oesophageal motility disorder, of unknown cause, which results in increased lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone and symptoms of difficulty swallowing. Treatments are aimed at reducing the LOS tone. Current endoscopic therapeutic options include pneumatic dilation (PD) or botulinum toxin injection (BTX).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of two endoscopic treatments, pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection, in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1966 to Oct 2005), EMBASE (1980 to Oct 2005), BIOSIS (1969 to Oct 2005) and Web of Science (1955 to October 2005). We also searched abstracts from significant Gastroenterology meetings (DDW, UEGW) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing PD to BTX injection in patients with primary achalasia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed quality assessment and data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies involving 178 participants were included. Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis of remission rates on the basis of clinical heterogeneity of the initial endoscopic protocols. There was no significant difference in remission between PD or BTX treatment within four weeks of the initial intervention, with a relative risk of remission of 1.15 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.38, P = 0.39) for PD compared to BTX. There was also no significant difference in the mean oesophageal pressures between the treatment groups; weighted mean difference for PD of -0.77 (95% CI -2.44 to 0.91, P = 0.37). Data on remission rates following the initial endoscopic treatment was available for two studies at six months and three studies at 12 months. At six months 22 of 29 PD participants were in remission compared to 7 of 27 in the BTX group, giving a relative risk of 2.90 (95% CI 1.48 to 5.67, P = 0.002); whilst at 12 months 33 of 47 PD participants were in remission compared to 11 of 43 BTX participants, relative risk of 2.67 (95% CI 1.58 to 4.52, P = 0.0002). No serious adverse outcomes occurred in participants receiving BTX, whilst PD was complicated by perforation in three cases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis would suggest that PD is the more effective endoscopic treatment in the long term (greater than six months) for patients with achalasia.

Non-surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia

Esophageal achalasia is an infrequent motility disorder characterized by a progressive stasis and dilation of the oesophagus; with subsequent risk of aspiration, weight loss, and malnutrition. Although the treatment of achalasia has been traditionally based on a surgical approach, especially with the introduction of laparoscopic techniques, there is still some space for a medical approach. The present article reviews the non-surgical therapeutic options for achalasia.

Review article: the management of achalasia - a comparison of different treatment modalities

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an uncommon primary oesophageal motor disorder with an unknown aetiology. Therapeutic options for achalasia are aimed at decreasing the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, improving the oesophageal empting, and most importantly, relieving the symptoms of achalasia. Modalities for treatment include pharmacologic, endoscopic, pneumatic dilatation and surgical. The decision of which modality to use involves the consideration of multiple clinical and economic factors.

AIM

To review the management strategies currently available for achalasia.

METHODS

A Medline search identified the original articles and reviews the published in the English language literature between 1966 and 2006.

RESULTS

The results reveal that pharmacotherapy, injection of botulinum toxin, pneumatic dilatation and minimally invasive surgical oesophagomyotomy are variably effective at controlling the symptoms of achalasia but that each modality has specific strengths and weaknesses which make them each suitable in certain populations. Overall, pharmacologic therapy results in the shortest lived, least durable response followed by botulinum toxin injection, pneumatic dilatation and surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal treatment for achalasia remains an area of controversy given our lack of complete understanding about the pathophysiology of the disease as well as the high numbers of clinical relapse after treatment. Further research focusing on optimal dosing of botulinum toxin injection and optimal timing of repeated graduated pneumatic dilatations could add to our knowledge regarding long-term therapy.

Treatment with botulinum toxin of octo-nonagerians with oesophageal achalasia: a two-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of oesophageal achalasia with intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin has proved to be a successful alternative treatment modality. However, little is known about its long-term effects in very old patients.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of such treatment in octo-nonagerians during a 2-year follow-up period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with idiopathic oesophageal achalasia (range 81-94 years) entered the study. After basal evaluation and screening procedures, 100 U of botulinum toxin was injected at the lower oesophageal sphincter, and the procedure was repeated 1 month later. Data were collected at baseline and were compared after 1 and 2 years following the procedure.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight per cent of patients were considered responders at 1 year and 54% were considered responders at 2 years. The weight gain at the end of the follow-up period was 2 (0-3) kg. No significant relationship was found between baseline lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and symptoms score after 1 and 2 years of follow-up; moreover, no major complications of botulinum toxin therapy were reported.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of very old achalasic patients with botulinum toxin is safe, effective and yields good quality of life in a substantial proportion of these subjects.

Primary esophageal motility disorders: Concise review for clinicians

Primary esophageal motility disorders comprise various abnormal manometric patterns which usually present with dysphagia or chest pain. Some, such as achalasia, are diseases with a well defined pathology, characteristic manometric features, and good response to treatments directed towards the palliation of symptoms. Other disorders, such as diffuse esophageal spasm and nutcracker esophagus, have no well defined pathology and could represent a range of motility abnormalities associated with subtle neuropathic changes, gastresophageal reflux and anxiety states. On the other hand, hypocontracting esophagus is generally caused by weak musculature commonly associated with gastresophageal reflux disease. Although manometric patterns have been defined for these disorders, the relation with symptoms is poorly defined and in some cases the response to medical or surgical therapy unpredictable. The aim of this paper is to present a wide spectrum of the primary esophageal motility disorders, as well as to give a concise review for the clinicians encountering these specific diseases. .

Functional and molecular analysis of L-type calcium channels in human esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter smooth muscle

Excitation of human esophageal smooth muscle involves the release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores and influx. The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) shows the distinctive property of tonic contraction; however, the mechanisms by which this is maintained are incompletely understood. We examined Ca(2+) channels in human esophageal muscle and investigated their contribution to LES tone. Functional effects were examined with tension recordings, currents were recorded with patch-clamp electrophysiology, channel expression was explored by RT-PCR, and intracellular Ca(2+) concentration was monitored by fura-2 fluorescence. LES muscle strips developed tone that was abolished by the removal of extracellular Ca(2+) and reduced by the application of the L-type Ca(2+) channel blocker nifedipine (to 13 +/- 6% of control) but was unaffected by the inhibition of sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase by cyclopiazonic acid (CPA). Carbachol increased tension above basal tone, and this effect was attenuated by treatment with CPA and nifedipine. Voltage-dependent inward currents were studied using patch-clamp techniques and dissociated cells. Similar inward currents were observed in esophageal body (EB) and LES smooth muscle cells. The inward currents in both tissues were blocked by nifedipine, enhanced by Bay K8644, and transiently suppressed by acetylcholine. The molecular form of the Ca(2+) channel was explored using RT-PCR, and similar splice variant combinations of the pore-forming alpha(1C)-subunit were identified in EB and LES. This is the first characterization of Ca(2+) channels in human esophageal smooth muscle, and we establish that L-type Ca(2+) channels play a critical role in maintaining LES tone.

Esophagotomy during laparoscopic Heller myotomy cannot be predicted by preoperative therapies and does not influence long-term outcome

The conventional wisdom is that inadvertent esophagotomy complicates laparoscopic Heller myotomy. This study was undertaken to determine if esophagotomy at myotomy can be predicted by preoperative therapy, and if esophagotomy and/or its repair jeopardizes outcomes. Of 222 laparoscopic Heller myotomies undertaken since 1992, inadvertent esophagotomy occurred in 16 patients (7%); 60 patients who underwent myotomy without esophagotomy were utilized for comparison. Dysphagia and reflux before/after myotomy were scored by patients on a Likert scale (0-5). The median (mean +/- SD) follow-up after myotomy with esophagotomy was 38.8 months (31.6 +/- 21.9 months) versus 46.3 months (51.0 +/- 21.2 months) after myotomy alone. All esophagotomies were immediately recognized and repaired. Patients who experienced esophagotomy were similar to those who did not in application of Botox (56% vs. 77%) or dilation (44% vs. 65%), years of dysphagia (7.3 +/- 5.4 vs. 7.4 +/- 6.0), and mean preoperative dysphagia score (4.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.4). Esophagotomy led to longer hospitalizations (5.2 days +/- 2.5 days vs. 1.5 days +/- 0.7 days, P < 0.05) but not different postoperative dysphagia scores (1.5 +/- 1.7 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.4), reflux scores (1.4 +/- 1.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.3), or good or excellent outcomes (86% vs 84%). Esophagotomy during laparoscopic Heller myotomy is infrequent and cannot be predicted by preoperative therapy or duration or severity of dysphagia. Furthermore, complications after esophagotomy are infrequent and outcomes are indistinguishable from those of patients undergoing uneventful myotomy.

Treatment of Achalasia

Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus that causes dysphagia. Normal esophageal motility and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function can not be restored; thus treatment is directed at decreasing the pressure or disrupting the muscle fibers of the LES to allow passage of ingested material. Effective therapy for achalasia can be broadly characterized as surgery based or endoscopy based. Medications (calcium channel blockers and nitrate derivatives) do not provide adequate relief of dysphagia and have substantial side effects, and thus are rarely used as long-term therapy. Botulinum toxin injection, a recently introduced endoscopic therapy, enjoyed much enthusiasm initially but was shown to have only transient effect and is now recommended only for poor operative candidates. The mainstay of therapy remains endoscopic dilation or laparoscopic esophagomyotomy (LEM) combined with an antireflux procedure. We have found that patients who can tolerate a laparoscopic abdominal surgery are best served with an LEM and Toupet (270 degrees ) posterior fundoplication. This provides good or excellent relief of dysphagia in 90% to 95% of patients with very little morbidity.

Botulinum toxin treatment of oesophageal achalasia in the old old and oldest old: a 1-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) has become one of the most frequent therapeutic approaches for the treatment of oesophageal achalasia. This treatment seems particularly effective in elderly patients who are not candidates for more invasive procedures.

AIMS

There are few or no data on BTX treatment of achalasia in the old old and oldest old. Therefore, we evaluated BTX treatment in a group of patients with achalasia in the extreme age range who were too ill or frail to undergo surgery or pneumatic dilatation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve elderly achalasic patients (age range 81-94 years, average age 86 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III-IV status were recruited for the study. After baseline clinical and instrumental evaluations, BTX 100U was injected at time 0 and 1 month later. Clinical follow-up was carried out after 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in symptom score was documented at each follow-up step. On the basis of improvements in scores, approximately 70% of patients were considered responders at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

BTX treatment is an effective treatment in a substantial proportion of achalasic patients >80 years of age, in whom benefits are still detectable after 12 months. BTX is a therapeutic option in patients unsuitable for surgery or pneumatic dilatation.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin injection before pneumatic dilatation in patients with idiopathic achalasia

Graded pneumatic dilatation (PD) is an appropriate long-term therapy and botulinum toxin injection (BT) is a relatively short-term therapy in idiopathic achalasia. Their combination has not been previously scrutinized. This study aimed to evaluate the role of BT in enhancing the efficacy of PD with 30 mm balloons. Patients who underwent PD with 30 mm balloons after botulinum toxin injections and a group of age- and sex-matched controls who were treated only with PD were enrolled in the study. Symptom scores were taken before, 1 month after and then every 3 months after PD. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, duration or severity of symptoms. One of the 12 patients in the case group relapsed 30 months after PD but the others were in remission for an average of 25.6 months. In the control group, all the patients relapsed after a mean of 12.6 months and needed a 35-mm PD. The cumulative remission rate was significantly higher in the case group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). The mean symptom score decreased by 76% in the case group (P < 0.001) and 53% in the controls (P < 0.01) at the end of the first month. Neither age, sex, nor duration or severity of symptoms were predictive of patients' responses to treatment. It seems that BT may be a meaningful enhancing factor in long-term efficacy of PD. PD with a 30 mm balloon after a BT session may resolve the need for the future higher grade PD.

Treatment with botulinum neurotoxin of gastrointestinal smooth muscles and sphincters spasms

Local injections of botulinum neurotoxin are now considered an efficacious treatment for neurological and non-neurological conditions. One of the most recent achievements in the field is the observation that botulinum neurotoxin provides benefit in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Botulinum neurotoxin inhibits contraction of gastrointestinal smooth muscles and sphincters; it has also been shown that the neurotoxin blocks cholinergic nerve endings in the autonomic nervous system, but it does not block nonadrenergic responses mediated by nitric oxide. This aspect has further promoted the interest to use botulinum neurotoxin as a treatment for overactive smooth muscles, such as the anal sphincters to treat anal fissure and outlet-type constipation, or the lower esophageal sphincter to treat esophageal achalasia. Knowledge of the anatomical and functional organization of innervation of the gastrointestinal tract is a prerequisite to understanding many features of botulinum neurotoxin action on the gut and the effects of injections placed into specific sphincters. This review presents current data on the use of botulinum neurotoxin to treat diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and summarizes recent knowledge on the pathogenesis of disorders of the gut due to a dysfunction of the enteric nervous system.

Long-term outcome of esophageal myotomy for achalasia

AIM: Modified Heller’s myotomy is still the first choice for achalasia and the assessment of surgical outcomes is usually made based on the subjective sensation of patients. This study was to objectively assess the long-term outcomes of esophageal myotomy for achalasia using esophageal manometry, 24-hourour pH monitoring, esophageal scintigraphy and fiberoptic esophagoscopy.

METHODS: From February 1979 to October 2000, 176 patients with achalasia underwent modified Heller’s myotomy, including esophageal myotomy alone in 146 patients, myotomy in combination with Gallone or Dor antireflux procedure in 22 and 8 patients, respectively. Clinical score, pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), esophageal clearance rate and gastroesophageal reflux were determined before and 1 to 22 years after surgery.

RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 14 years, 84.5% of patients had a good or excellent relief of symptoms, and clinical scores as well as resting pressures of the esophageal body and LES were reduced compared with preoperative values (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in DeMeester score between pre- and postoperative patients (P = 0.51). Esophageal transit was improved in postoperative patients, but still slower than that in normal controls. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients who underwent esophageal myotomy alone was 63.6% compared to 27.3% in those who underwent myotomy and antireflux procedure (P = 0.087). Three (1.7%) patients were complicated with esophageal cancer after surgery.

CONCLUSION: Esophageal myotomy for achalasia can reduce the resting pressures of the esophageal body and LES and improve esophageal transit and dysphagia. Myotomy in combination with antireflux procedure can prevent gastroesophageal reflux to a certain extent, but further randomized studies should be carried out to demonstrate its efficacy.

Nitrates for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a disease that impairs oesophageal motility. Though nitrates have been used to treat achalasia for a long time, the effectiveness of nitrates for achalasia is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify short-term and long-term effects of nitrate therapy in patients with achalasia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4-2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), EMBASE (1980-2001), LILACS - Latin American and Caribbean health science literature (1982-2001) and CBM-Chinese Biomedical database(1980-2000). Additionally, all references in the identified trials were checked for further relevant trials. An updated search was run on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE in September 2003 - no new trials were found.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving achalasic patients given any type of nitrates were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent observers based on the intention to treat principle.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised cross-over studies were found, but no results are included. Due to the design of the studies and the method of reporting the results in the original paper it was not possible to extract the necessary information to examine any of the outcomes.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude no implications for practice at this stage. Appropriately designed parallel group randomised controlled trials with long term follow-up are needed to determine the effects of nitrates.

Nitrates for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a disease that impairs oesophageal motility. Though nitrates have been used to treat achalasia for a long time, the effectiveness of nitrates for achalasia is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify short-term and long-term effects of nitrate therapy in patients with achalasia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4-2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), EMBASE (1980-2001), LILACS - Latin American and Caribbean health science literature (1982-2001) and CBM-Chinese Biomedical database(1980-2000). Additionally, all references in the identified trials were checked for further relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving achalasic patients given any type of nitrates were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent observers based on the intention to treat principle.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised cross-over studies were found, but no results are included. Due to the design of the studies and the method of reporting the results in the original paper it was not possible to extract the necessary information to examine any of the outcomes.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude no implications for practice at this stage. Appropriately designed parallel group randomised controlled trials with long term follow-up are needed to determine the effects of nitrates.

Randomized controlled trial comparing botulinum toxin injection to pneumatic dilatation for the treatment of achalasia

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic options for achalasia include pharmacological therapy, surgical myotomy, pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection.

AIM

To compare botulinum toxin injection with pneumatic dilatation in a randomized trial.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Forty adults with newly diagnosed achalasia were randomized to receive botulinum toxin (n=20) or pneumatic dilatation (n=20). Symptom scores were evaluated at 1, 6 and 12 months. Clinical relapse was defined as a symptom score greater than 50% of baseline. Relapsers received a second botulinum toxin injection or pneumatic dilatation.

RESULTS

The cumulative 12-month remission rate was significantly higher after a single pneumatic dilatation (53%) compared to a single botulinum toxin injection (15%)(P < 0.01). The 12-month estimated adjusted hazard for relapse and need for retreatment for the botulinum toxin group was 2.69 times that of the pneumatic dilatation group (95% confidence interval; 1.18-6.14). When a second treatment was administered to the relapsers in each group, the cumulative remission rate 1 year after initial treatment was significantly higher in the pneumatic dilatation group (100%) compared to the botulinum toxin group (60%) (P < 0.01). There were no major complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumatic dilatation is more efficacious than botulinum toxin in providing sustained symptomatic relief in patients with achalasia. The efficacy of a single pneumatic dilatation is similar to that of two botulinum toxin injections.

Practical approaches to dysphagia caused by Esophageal motor disorders

Dysphagia is a common symptom with which patients present. This review focuses primarily on the esophageal motor disorders that result in dysphagia. Following a brief description of the normal swallowing mechanisms and the messengers involved, more specific motor abnormalities are discussed. The importance of achalasia, as the only pathophysiologically defined esophageal motor disorder, is discussed in some detail, including recent developments in pathogenesis and treatment options. Other esophageal spastic disorders are described, with relevant manometric tracings included. In recent years, the importance of gastroesophageal reflux as a primary cause of esophageal dysmotility has been recognized, and this is also discussed. In addition, the motility disturbances that develop after surgical fundoplication are reviewed.

Esophageal motor disorders

Motor dysfunction is responsible for symptomatic illnesses both in the proximal skeletal muscle region and in the distal smooth muscle esophagus. Practical methods for diagnosing and treating oropharyngeal dysphagia continue to reach consensus. Achalasia, the most significant of the distal motor disorders, is of investigative interest because of the expanded armamentarium of treatment options. Minimally invasive surgical methods have taken an important foothold as a primary treatment of this disorder. Appreciation is growing for sensory dysfunction that accompanies distal motor disorders. Such dysfunction may help explain the observed discrepancies between symptoms and measurable motility abnormality.