Treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours with octreotide LAR

From biology to clinical practice: antiproliferative effects of somatostatin analogs in neuroendocrine neoplasms

Somatostatin analogs (SSA), specifically octreotide and lanreotide, have demonstrated antiproliferative effects in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET), a group of rare malignancies of diverse origin and presentation. A prominent feature of NET cells is the expression of G protein-coupled receptors called somatostatin receptors (SSTR). Although these SSTR are not uniformly present in NET, they can be instrumental in the diagnosis and treatment of NET. Apart from their application in nuclear imaging and radionuclide therapy, SSA have proven invaluable in the treatment of hormonal syndromes associated with certain NET (antisecretory effects of SSA), but it took more than two decades to convincingly demonstrate the antiproliferative effects of SSA in metastatic NET with the two pivotal studies PROMID and CLARINET. The current review summarizes three decades of SSA treatment and provides an overview of the clinical trial landscape for SSA monotherapy and combination therapy, including clinical implications and quality of life aspects, as well as ongoing fields of research.

The Structure of Cyclic Neuropeptide Somatostatin and Octapeptide Octreotide in the Presence of Copper Ions: Insights from Transition Metal Ion FRET and Native Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

The conformation and function of somatostatin (SST), a cyclic neuropeptide, was recently found to be altered in the presence of Cu(II) ions, which leads to self-aggregation and loss of biological function as a neurotransmitter. However, the impact of Cu(II) ions on the structure and function of SST is not fully understood. In this work, transition metal ion Förster resonance energy transfer (tmFRET) and native ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) were utilized to study the structures of well-defined gas-phase ions of SST and of a smaller analogue, octreotide (OCT). The tmFRET results suggest two binding sites of Cu(II) ions in both native-like SST and OCT ions, either in close proximity to the disulfide bond or complexed by two aromatic residues, consistent with results obtained from collision-induced dissociation (CID). The former binding site was reported to initiate aggregation of SST, while the latter binding site could directly affect the essential motif for receptor binding and therefore impair the biological function of SST and OCT when bound to SST receptors. Our results demonstrate that tmFRET is capable of locating transition metal ion binding sites in neuropeptides. Furthermore, multiple distance constraints (tmFRET) and global shape (IM-MS) provide additional structural insights of SST and OCT ions upon metal binding, which is related to the self-aggregation mechanisms and overall biological functions.

The Role of Somatostatin Analogues in the Control of Diarrhea and Flushing as Markers of Carcinoid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are the cornerstone of treatment for carcinoid syndrome (CS)-related symptoms. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the percentage of patients achieving partial (PR) or complete response (CR) with the use of long-acting SSAs in patients with CS.

METHODS

A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus to identify eligible studies. Any clinical trials reporting data on the efficacy of SSAs to alleviate symptoms in adult patients were considered as potentially eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies reported extractable outcomes (PR/CR) for quantitative synthesis. The pooled percentage of patients with PR/CR for diarrhea was estimated to be 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.79, I₂ = 83%). Subgroup analyses of specific drugs provided no evidence of a differential response. With regards to flushing, the pooled percentage of patients with PR/CR was estimated to be 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52-0.81, I₂ = 86%). Similarly, no evidence of a significant differential response in flushing control was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

We estimate there is a 67-68% overall reduction in symptoms of CS associated with SSA treatment. However, significant heterogeneity was detected, possibly revealing differences in the disease course, in management and in outcome definition.

Somatostatin analogs in patients with Zollinger Ellison syndrome (ZES): an observational study

PURPOSE

Zollinger Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a rare syndrome caused by gastrin hypersecretion from a gastrinoma. Gastrinoma treatment has two goals: the control of acid hypersecretion and the control of tumor growth. While therapy for the syndrome is univocally based on proton pump inhibitors, the one for disease control is still debated. We here aimed at evaluating the role of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in the control of tumor progression in a series of ZES patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of ZES patients, followed and managed from 1990 to 2019, was performed. The patients' clinical, pathological, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed. Data regarding SSAs therapy start, dosage, duration, and side effects were collected.

RESULTS

33 patients with ZES were diagnosed. Fourteen patients (42%) had a grade 1 (G1) neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN), five had G2 (15%), none had G3. Fifteen patients (45%) had metastatic disease. Overall, 12 (36%) underwent SSAs therapy. The median treatment duration was 36 months. Eight patients (67%) had a sustained response to SSAs, four (33%) showed an early progression, with a significant difference in terms of PFS between the patients with early and late progression (84 vs 2 months, p = 0.004). No differences in terms of OS and PFS were observed between the treated and non-treated patients, despite the proportion of metastatic patients was greater in the SSAs-treated group (75% vs 29% in the non-treated group, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Present data support the use of SSAs in ZES, considering that gastrinoma is mainly a well-differentiated low-grade tumor (G1 or G2), with a high expression of somatostatin receptors.

Role of Somatostatin Receptor in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Development, Diagnosis, and Therapy

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare and part of the diverse family of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which are widely expressed in NENs, are G-protein coupled receptors that can be activated by somatostatins or its synthetic analogs. Therefore, SSTRs have been widely researched as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in pNETs. A large number of studies have demonstrated the clinical significance of SSTRs in pNETs. In this review, relevant literature has been appraised to summarize the most recent empirical evidence addressing the clinical significance of SSTRs in pNETs. Overall, these studies have shown that SSTRs have great value in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic prediction of pNETs; however, further research is still necessary.

Antiproliferative Effects of Telotristat Ethyl in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: The TELEACE Real-World Chart Review Study

Purpose

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) associated with carcinoid syndrome (CS) overproduce serotonin, mediated by tryptophan hydroxylase-1 (TPH1). The TPH inhibitor telotristat ethyl (TE) reduces peripheral serotonin and relieves CS symptoms. We conducted a real-world clinical practice study to explore the effects of TE on tumor growth in patients with NETs and CS.

Patients and Methods

Single-arm, pre/post chart review study of patients with advanced NETs who received TE for ≥6 months and had ≥2 radiological scans within 12 months before and ≥1 scan after TE initiation. Linear regression and longitudinal analyses assessed changes in tumor size controlling for background NET treatment.

Results

Two hundred patients were enrolled, most (61%) had well-differentiated gastrointestinal NETs (61%) and received TE for an average of 12 months (SD, 7.3). Mean reduction in tumor size after TE initiation was 0.59 cm (p=0.006). Longitudinal analysis showed an 8.5% reduction in tumor size (p=0.045) from pre- to post-TE periods. Documented NET treatment prior to initiating TE and time between scans were not significant predictors of changes in tumor size. Results were consistent in a subgroup of patients with the same documented NET treatment before and after initiating TE.

Conclusion

TE may have antitumor effects consistent with serotonin overproduction in tumor growth.

Somatostatin Analogs in Clinical Practice: a Review

Somatostatin analogs are an invaluable therapeutic option in the diagnosis and treatment of somatotropinomas, thyrotropinomas, and functioning and non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. They should also be considered an effective and safe therapeutic alternative to corticotropinomas, gonadotropinomas, and prolactinomas resistant to dopamine agonists. Somatostatin analogs have also shown to be useful in the treatment of other endocrine diseases (congenital hyperinsulinism, Graves’ orbitopathy, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema), non-endocrine tumors (breast, colon, prostate, lung, and hepatocellular), and digestive diseases (chronic refractory diarrhea, hepatorenal polycystosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, dumping syndrome, and intestinal fistula).

Maintenance with lanreotide in small-cell lung cancer expressing somatostatine receptors: A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial

OBJECTIVES

Considering the frequent expression of somatostatine receptors, we designed the G04.2011 trial to investigate the efficacy of the somatostatine analogue lanreotide in maintenance for SCLC patients after response to standard treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial was conducted in SCLC expressing somatostatine receptors at baseline Octreoscan, responding after platinum-based chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive maintenance lanreotide 120 mg subcutaneously every 28 days, up to 1 year or progression versus observation. Randomization was stratified according to stage (limited/extended, LD/ED). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were randomly assigned (39 to lanreotide, 32 to observation) in 9 Italian institutions. Median PFS was 3.6 (95% CI 3.2-3.9) with lanreotide versus 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-2.9) with observation (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.90-2.50; P = 0.11). Stage was an independent predictor for PFS (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.77-5.57; P < 0.0001). Median PFS was 7.0 (95% CI <1-13.5) with lanreotide versus 3.8 months (95% CI <1-8.6) with observation in LD (P = 0.21), and 3.0 (95% CI 2.2-3.8) versus 2.2 (95% 1.7-2.7) in ED (P = 0.19). Median OS was 9.5 (95% CI 4.8-14.3) with lanreotide versus 4.7 months (95% CI <1-16.6) with observation (P = 0.47). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28% of patients with lanreotide (grade 3 in two patients).

CONCLUSION

Although survival outcomes were not significantly prolonged with lanreotide as a maintenance in SCLC expressing somatostatin receptors after response to standard treatment, lanreotide showed a slight PFS benefit in LD SCLC deserving further investigations.

Systematic literature review of the antitumor effect of octreotide in neuroendocrine tumors

AIM

To provide a comprehensive examination of the existing evidence of the antitumor effect of long-acting octreotide in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

METHODS

A systematic literature review of clinical trials and observational studies was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane through January 18, 2017. Conference abstracts for 2015 and 2016 from 5 scientific meetings were also searched.

RESULTS

Of 41 articles/abstracts identified, 13 unique studies compared octreotide with active or no treatment. Two of the 13 studies were clinical trials; the remaining were observational studies. The phase 3 Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study of the Effect of Octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors clinical trial showed that long-acting octreotide significantly prolonged time to tumor progression compared with placebo in patients with functionally active and inactive metastatic midgut NETs; no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed, possibly due to the crossover of placebo patients to octreotide. Retrospective observational studies found that long-acting octreotide use was associated with significantly longer OS than no octreotide use for patients with distant metastases although not for those with local/regional disease.

CONCLUSION

The clinical trial and observational studies with informative evidence support long-acting octreotide’s antitumor effect on time to tumor progression and OS. This review showed the rarity of existing studies assessing octreotide’s antitumor effect and recommends that future research is warranted.

The Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: is there a role for somatostatin analogues in the treatment of the gastrinoma?

PURPOSE

Analyze the role of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) in the treatment of sporadic and MEN1-related gastrinomas, trying to define whether recent trials have changed the landscape of gastrinoma therapy.

METHODS

We evaluate the rationale of SSA use in the treatment of gastrinomas, summarize the current literature concerning the effect of SSAs on the control of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) and gastrinomas tumor progression and discuss their role in the most recent guidelines.

RESULTS

The medical treatment of gastrinoma and related ZES is aimed at controlling acid hypersecretion and tumor progression, in inoperable patients. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to control the syndrome is a cornerstone in the ZES therapy. SSAs are not usually indicated for antisecretory purpose, because PPIs are considered the treatment of choice, due to their long lasting high efficacy and oral availability. The antiproliferative effect of SSAs has been established by two placebo-controlled trials that have clearly demonstrated a significant increase in progression free survival in patients affected by non-functioning well-differentiated advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The recent ENETS guidelines recommend the use of SSAs in advanced well differentiated NETs as antiproliferative agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The high sstr-expression in gastrinomas make them highly responsive to SSAs and support the use of such drugs to counteract the tumour growth in patients not amenable to surgical cure. Unfortunately, limited data, mainly case reports or small series, support the use of SSAs in advanced gastrinomas, therefore, it is difficult to quantify their ability to control tumour growth and disease progression.

Irinotecan plus cisplatin followed by octreotide long-acting release maintenance treatment in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: IPO-NEC study

There have been very few prospective studies of first-line chemotherapy on advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC). This phase II study assessed the activity and safety of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) followed by octreotide long-acting release (LAR) maintenance treatment in advanced GEP-NEC. Forty patients were treated and eighteen patients (45.0%) had a partial response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.7 months and 12.9 months, respectively. Because GEP-NECs are heterogeneous, a subgroup analysis was conducted by dividing all patients into a high proliferation neuroendocrine tumor (NET) group (well differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms with a Ki-67 level between 20-60%) or a poorly differentiated NEC (PDNEC) group. Compared with the PDNEC group, the patients in high proliferation NET group had a lower response rate (0% versus 51.4%) but longer PFS (8.9 versus 5.7 months) and received more octreotide LAR treatment (median cycles, 7 versus 3). The most common toxicities included grade 3/4 leukopenia/neutropenia (60%), nausea/vomiting (17.5%) and diarrhea (12.5%). Therefore, IP is an active regimen in patients with advanced GEP-PDNEC and should probably not be given to patients with advanced high proliferative NET. The benefit of octreotide LAR maintenance therapy on high proliferation NETs requires further study.

Long-acting somatostatin analogues in the treatment of unresectable/metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a relatively rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms with an annual incidence of ~35 cases per 100,000 people in the United States. The updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification system of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs categorizes these tumors according to site of origin, clinical syndrome, and degree of differentiation. Well-differentiated NETs arising from the gastrointestinal tract or lungs (formerly known as carcinoid tumors) are often indolent and slow-growing. In contrast, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Due to their insidious onset, most NETs are diagnosed at an advanced stage and a curative approach is not possible. In these patients, medical therapy is limited to disease control, including relief of symptoms that arise from overproduction of peptide hormones by the tumors. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) have remained the mainstay of symptoms control. In addition to symptoms control, clinical data also support an anti-proliferative effect of SSAs in patients with well- to moderately differentiated NETs. Long-acting SSAs have greatly facilitated their use. This review will focus on two long-acting SSAs, octreotide LAR and lanreotide, and their use in the clinical setting. Information necessary to assess their relative merits is summarized. We conclude these two therapies are interchangeable making value a very important consideration in their use.

Somatostatin analogues in functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: literature review, clinical recommendations and schedules

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which include functioning and non-functioning forms. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) play a key role in the management of these tumours. Herein, we aimed at reviewing the current evidence about the role of SSAs in the treatment of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An extensive bibliographical search was performed in PubMed using the following keywords: gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, somatostatin analogues, octreotide, lanreotide, in order to identify all the pertinent English-written articles published between 1990 and 2015.

RESULTS

SSAs have shown to help the symptomatic and biochemical improvement of patients with NETs and to exhibit a good safety profile. Recent studies have also reported a role for SSAs in tumour growth control, although the results are less impressive and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

CONCLUSIONS

SSAs are well known as a symptomatic and, to lesser extent, anti-proliferative treatment in GEP-NETs. However, some issues, including optimal dosage, benefits and adverse events of combination with other molecules, and the role of new analogues, remain to be elucidated in further randomised studies.

Systemic treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETS): current approaches and future options

OBJECTIVE

To describe recent advances in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

A review of the published English language literature on GEP-NET therapy with a focus on practice-changing clinical trials.

RESULTS

Somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment remains a cornerstone of GEP-NET therapy, primarily for patients with hormonally functional tumors and midgut carcinoids. The biologic agents everolimus and sunitinib have similar tumor-stabilizing effects in pancreatic NETs and are both approved to treat progressive low-intermediate-grade tumors. Their role in nonpancreatic NETs remains controversial. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is effective against pancreatic NETs, but modern prospective data is lacking. Radiolabeled SSAs will likely become more widely available once phase III randomized studies are completed.

CONCLUSIONS

New treatment options for GEP-NETs have become available and highlight the necessity of developing predictive biomarkers that will allow for appropriate and individualized therapy selection.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: pathologic and molecular characteristics

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms include mainly well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors but also rare poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Molecular mechanisms underlying pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorigenesis have recently been elucidated. While alterations in the chromatin remodeling and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways are present in most well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, mutations in TP53 and RB may contribute to the development of pancreatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. With these discoveries, new molecular targeted therapies have become available and show promise in some patients with pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor.

Impact of long-acting octreotide in patients with early-stage MEN1-related duodeno-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues (SSA) represent one of the main therapeutic option in patients affected with functioning well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). There are no studies specifically focusing on NETs associated with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of the long-acting SSA octreotide in MEN1 patients with early-stage duodeno-pancreatic NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with MEN1 were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty patients with evidence of one or more MEN1-related duodeno-pancreatic NETs < 20 mm in size (age range 26-61 years) were treated with octreotide long-acting octreotide (LAR) as first-line therapy. Treatment duration ranged 12-75 months. At the baseline radiological evaluation, multiple duodeno-pancreatic NETs (range 1-8, size 3-18 mm) were detected.

RESULTS

An objective tumour response was observed in 10%, stable disease in 80% and progression of disease in 10% of cases. In six patients with abnormally increased CgA, gastrin and/or insulin serum concentrations, a significant clinical and hormonal response occurred in 100% of cases and was stable along the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with SSA is highly safe and effective in patients with early-stage MEN1 duodeno-pancreatic NETs, resulting in long-time suppression of tumour and hormonal activity and 10% objective response. This suggests to early start therapy with SSA in patients with MEN1-related NETs.

Somatostatin analogs: does pharmacology impact antitumor efficacy?

Somatostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of secretion and cell proliferation. These features render somatostatin a logical candidate for the management of neuroendocrine tumors that express somatostatin receptors. Synthetic somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have longer half-lives than somatostatin, but have similar activities, and are used for the treatment of these types of disorders. Interest has focused on novel multireceptor analogs with broader affinity to several of the five somatostatin receptors, thereby presenting putatively higher antitumor activities. Recent evidence indicates that SSAs cannot be considered mimics of native somatostatin in regulating signaling pathways downstream of receptors. Here we review this knowledge, discuss the concept of biased agonism, and highlight what considerations need to be taken into account for the optimal clinical use of SSAs.

Octreotide - A Review of its Use in Treating Neuroendocrine Tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms whose incidence has dramatically increased in recent years. Octreotide is a somatostatin analogue used in the treatment of NETs, and its use in clinical trials has been associated with substantially increased survival. Although traditionally used for the relief of symptoms that result from release of peptides and neuroamines, there has been a growing body of evidence that suggest octreotide has antiproliferative effects. A phase III clinical study has demonstrated that the long-acting formulation (LAR), octreotide LAR, lengthens time to tumour progression in patients with well-differentiated metastatic midgut NETs, and that octreotide LAR is a treatment option for patients with metastatic midgut NETs, regardless of functional status. Furthermore, octreotide LAR has demonstrated clinical efficacy in different types of NETs. These data, along with emerging data on somatostatin analogs, may change the way doctors approach this patient population and reinforce the use of these drugs as a treatment option for patients with non-functioning tumours.

Somatostatin analogs therapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: current aspects and new perspectives

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare tumors that present many clinical features secreting peptides and neuroamines that cause distinct clinical syndromes such as carcinoid syndrome. However most of them are clinically silent until late presentation with mass effects. Surgical resection is the first line treatment for a patient with a GEP-NET while in metastatic disease multiple therapeutic approaches are possible. GEP-NETs are able to express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) bounded by somatostatin (SST) or its synthetic analogs, although the subtypes and number of SSTRs expressed are very variable. In particular, SST analogs are used frequently to control hormone-related symptoms while their anti-neoplastic activity seems to result prevalently in tumor stabilization. Patients who fail to respond or cease to respond to standard SST analogs treatment seem to have a response to higher doses of these drugs. For this reason, the use of higher doses of SST analogs will probably improve the clinical management of these patients.

The use of biomarkers in neuroendocrine tumours

The incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arising from the gastrointestinal tract are increasing. At the time of diagnosis, histological grade, based on Ki-67 proliferation index on a tumour biopsy or specimen, offers prognostication but with often lengthy survival, this may not reflect current tumour biology later in the disease course. Biomarkers, including plasma chromogranin A, urinary 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid and pancreatic specific hormones (insulin, gastrin, vasoactive intestinal peptide), have a role in diagnosis but despite being incorporated into routine clinical practice, there is a lack of robust prospectively collected data investigating their prognostic and predictive value. Given the increasing number of treatment options available for NETs and prolonged survival, there is no agreement on the order of treatment for individual NET patients but the emergence of novel biomarkers and validation of existing ones, in addition to better understanding of the molecular biology, may help solve this clinical problem.

Causes of death and prognostic factors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a prospective study: comparison of 106 MEN1/Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patients with 1613 literature MEN1 patients with or without pancreatic endocrine tumors

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is classically characterized by the development of functional or nonfunctional hyperplasia or tumors in endocrine tissues (parathyroid, pancreas, pituitary, adrenal). Because effective treatments have been developed for the hormone excess state, which was a major cause of death in these patients in the past, coupled with the recognition that nonendocrine tumors increasingly develop late in the disease course, the natural history of the disease has changed. An understanding of the current causes of death is important to tailor treatment for these patients and to help identify prognostic factors; however, it is generally lacking.To add to our understanding, we conducted a detailed analysis of the causes of death and prognostic factors from a prospective long-term National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of 106 MEN1 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1/ZES patients) and compared our results to those from the pooled literature data of 227 patients with MEN1 with pancreatic endocrine tumors (MEN1/PET patients) reported in case reports or small series, and to 1386 patients reported in large MEN1 literature series. In the NIH series over a mean follow-up of 24.5 years, 24 (23%) patients died (14 MEN1-related and 10 non-MEN1-related deaths). Comparing the causes of death with the results from the 227 patients in the pooled literature series, we found that no patients died of acute complications due to acid hypersecretion, and 8%-14% died of other hormone excess causes, which is similar to the results in 10 large MEN1 literature series published since 1995. In the 2 series (the NIH and pooled literature series), two-thirds of patients died from an MEN1-related cause and one-third from a non-MEN1-related cause, which agrees with the mean values reported in 10 large MEN1 series in the literature, although in the literature the causes of death varied widely. In the NIH and pooled literature series, the main causes of MEN1-related deaths were due to the malignant nature of the PETs, followed by the malignant nature of thymic carcinoid tumors. These results differ from the results of a number of the literature series, especially those reported before the 1990s. The causes of non-MEN1-related death for the 2 series, in decreasing frequency, were cardiovascular disease, other nonendocrine tumors > lung diseases, cerebrovascular diseases. The most frequent non-MEN1-related tumor deaths were colorectal, renal > lung > breast, oropharyngeal. Although both overall and disease-related survival are better than in the past (30-yr survival of NIH series: 82% overall, 88% disease-related), the mean age at death was 55 years, which is younger than expected for the general population.Detailed analysis of causes of death correlated with clinical, laboratory, and tumor characteristics of patients in the 2 series allowed identification of a number of prognostic factors. Poor prognostic factors included higher fasting gastrin levels, presence of other functional hormonal syndromes, need for >3 parathyroidectomies, presence of liver metastases or distant metastases, aggressive PET growth, large PETs, or the development of new lesions.The results of this study have helped define the causes of death of MEN1 patients at present, and have enabled us to identify a number of prognostic factors that should be helpful in tailoring treatment for these patients for both short- and long-term management, as well as in directing research efforts to better define the natural history of the disease and the most important factors determining long-term survival at present.

A review of the use of somatostatin analogs in oncology

Somatostatin is a neuropeptide produced by paracrine cells that are located throughout the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and pancreas, and is also found in various locations of the nervous system. It exerts neural control over many physiological functions including inhibition of gastrointestinal endocrine secretion through its receptors. Potent and biologically stable analogs of somatostatin have been developed. These somatostatin analogs show different efficacy on different receptors, and receptors are varyingly concentrated in specific tissues. Antitumor and antisecretory effects of somatostatin analogs in cancer have been shown in several in vivo and in vitro studies. However, these activities have not always yielded into clinically relevant patient outcome benefit. Somatostatin analogs are of clinical benefit in treating symptoms of ectopic hormone secretion (adrenocorticotropic hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone) in lung cancer, without inducing a significant tumor response. They have also been shown to induce a statistically significant decrease in bone pain and increase in Karnofsky performance status in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Somatostatin analogs alone or in combination with other agents have only limited antitumoral effect in breast cancer. In gastrointestinal cancers, studies have not shown an objective tumor response to somatostatin analogs except in endocrine tumors of the liver with symptomatic and biochemical improvement. In neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal system and pancreas, very high symptomatic and biochemical response rates have been achieved with somatostatin analogs. Antiproliferative activity has been clearly shown in metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors.

Update on the role of somatostatin analogs for the treatment of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin analogs (SA) are the standard of care for controlling symptoms of patients with functional gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). SA control symptoms in more than 70% of patients with carcinoid syndrome. Similar results are obtained in patients with functional, hormone-secreting, pancreatic NETs. The use of SA as antiproliferative agents has been established only recently. Retrospective studies have shown stabilization of tumor growth in >50% of patients with progressive disease. The results of a recent randomized phase III trial (PROMID) demonstrated that the median time to progression in patients with midgut carcinoid tumors treated with octreotide LAR (Long-Acting-Repeatable, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) was more than twice as long compared to that of patients treated with placebo. The results of a phase III study of lanreotide versus placebo in nonfunctional NETs are not yet available. More studies are needed to determine whether combining SA with novel targeted treatments will result in enhanced antiproliferative activity compared to treatment with a SA alone. Studies are ongoing using pan-receptor agonists (eg, pasireotide) and chimeric dimers, which possess features of somatostatin and dopamine agonists (dopastatins) and are thought to enhance symptom control by binding multiple receptors (somatostatin and dopamine receptors). Somatostatin receptor antagonists are also currently being developed for clinical use. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), consisting of yttrium-90 and lutetium-177 isotopes conjugated with SA appear to be efficacious in advanced NETs. Randomized studies are needed to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of this strategy compared to other available treatments, and to determine which radiolabeled isotopes or combinations are most effective.

Systemic treatment in unresectable metastatic well-differentiated carcinoid tumors: consensus results from a modified delphi process

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop expert consensus for the use of systemic treatments for unresectable metastatic well-differentiated (grade 1-2) carcinoid tumors using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process.

METHODS

After a comprehensive literature review, 404 patient scenarios addressing the use of systemic treatments for carcinoid tumors were constructed. A multidisciplinary panel of 10 physicians assessed the scenarios as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain (on a 1-9 scale) or as an area of disagreement before and after an extended discussion of the evidence.

RESULTS

Experts were medical and surgical oncologists, interventional radiologists, and gastroenterologists. Among rated scenarios, disagreement decreased from 14% before the meeting to 4% after. Consensus statements about midgut carcinoids included the following: (1) Somatostatin analogs are appropriate as first-line therapy for all patients; (2) In patients with uncontrolled secretory symptoms, it is appropriate to increase the dose/frequency of octreotide long-acting repeatable up to 60 mg every 4 weeks or up to 40 mg every 3 weeks as second-line therapy for refractory carcinoid syndrome. Other options may also be appropriate. Consensus was similar for non-midgut carcinoids.

CONCLUSIONS

The Delphi process provided a structured methodological approach to assist clinician experts in reaching consensus on the appropriateness of specific medical therapies for the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumors.

Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreas malignancies--where does it fit?

INTRODUCTION

Sunitinib , a broad-spectrum multikinase inhibitor, was recently approved for use in progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Its mechanism of action affects various signaling cascades involving antiangiogenesis and tumor proliferation, including vascular endothelial growth factors and platelet-derived growth factors.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review sunitinib's mechanism of action at a molecular level and review key preclinical and clinical studies for pNETs and more limited data regarding sunitinib's evaluation in pancreas adenocarcinoma. The data for sunitinib in pNETs are placed in the context of the changing landscape of therapeutic options for this cancer, and relevant ongoing clinical trials and future directions are highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Sunitinib malate has become integrated into routine clinical management for pNETs; however, its role in pancreas adenocarcinoma is not established.

Biotherapies for GEP-NETs

Biological treatment for GI neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) includes treatment with somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons. Both of these therapies were developed in the early 1980's and initially for treatment of a carcinoid syndrome in patients with small intestinal NETs. Later on tumour biology studies indicated that well differentiated NETs (G1-tumours) benefit from treatment with somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons. Both agents give symptomatic improvement in patients with functioning tumours in 40-60% of the patients, biochemical responses in 50-70% of the patients and significant tumour shrinkage in 5-10% of the patients. Combination therapy with somatostatin analogues and alpha interferon has demonstrated some clinical benefit.

IN CONCLUSION

Somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons are still playing an important role and considered to be first-line treatment in functioning and in non-functioning well-differentiated NETs, (G1-tumours) and somatostatin analogues might also be applied to control clinical symptoms in G2-tumours with higher proliferation.

Antitumor effects of somatostatin analogs in neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

For decades, somatostatin analogs (including octreotide and lanreotide) have been indicated for relief of the symptoms of flushing, diarrhea, and wheezing associated with secretory neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, it has been suggested that somatostatin analogs may provide direct and indirect antitumor effects in secretory and nonsecretory NETs in addition to symptom control in secretory NETs.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE was conducted to identify studies that investigated the antitumor effects of octreotide or lanreotide for patients with NETs. Additional studies not published in the peer-reviewed literature were identified by searching online abstracts. Results. In all, 17 octreotide trials and 11 lanreotide trials that included antitumor effects were identified. Partial response rates were between 0% and 31%, and stable disease rates were between 15% and 89%. Octreotide was the only somatostatin analog for which results of a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that investigated antitumor effects were published. After 6 months of treatment in this randomized phase III trial, stable disease was observed in 67% of patients (hazard ratio for time to disease progression: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.59; p = .000072).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to symptom control for NETs, the data support an antitumor effect of somatostatin analogs and suggest that they may slow tumor growth. Long-acting repeatable octreotide has been shown to have an antitumor effect in a randomized phase III trial in midgut NETs, whereas results are pending in a corresponding controlled trial with lanreotide for patients with intestinal and pancreatic primary NETs.

Medical treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Treatment of the clinically and prognostically heterogeneous neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) should be based on a multidisciplinary approach, including surgical, interventional, medical and nuclear medicine-based therapeutic options. Medical therapies include somatostatin analogues, interferon-α, mTOR inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors and systemic chemotherapy. For the selection of the appropriate medical treatment the hormonal activity, primary tumor localization, tumor grading and growth behaviour as well as the extent of the disease must be considered. Somatostatin analogues are mainly indicated in hormonally active tumors for symptomatic relief, but antiproliferative effects have also been demonstrated, especially in well-differentiated intestinal NET. The efficacy of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) has been demonstrated in large placebo-controlled clinical trials. pNETs are also chemosensitive. Streptozocin-based chemotherapeutic regimens are regarded as current standard of care. Temozolomide in combination with capecitabine is an alternative that has shown promising results that need to be confirmed in larger trials. Currently, no comparative studies and no molecular markers are established that predict the response to medical treatment. Therefore the choice of treatment for each pNET patient is based on individual parameters taking into account the patient’s preference, expected side effects and established response criteria such as proliferation rate and tumor load. Platin-based chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Clearly, there is an unmet need for new systemic treatment options in patients with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Therapeutic management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are best managed in a specialist centre as part of a multidisciplinary team comprising gastroenterologists, oncologists, endocrinologists, gastrointestinal and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeons, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians and technicians, radiologists, specialist nurses, pharmacists, biochemists and dieticians. This should ideally be led by a clinician with experience and interest in NETs. Although the number of medical treatments and clinical trials has increased in the decade, there is still a lack of prospective randomised trials; thus, management is mainly based on limited often single-centre studies, although there are now formal guidelines based on consensus expert opinion. We have outlined the current optimal management of patients with NETs. We have reviewed therapeutic options including surgery, somatostatin analogues and other biotherapies and peptide receptor-targeted therapy. We have discussed the challenge in managing hepatic metastases including hepatic artery embolisation, ablation and orthotopic liver transplant. In addition, we have briefly reviewed the emerging therapies such as the mammalian target of rapamycin and angiogenic inhibitors and the newer somatostatin analogues.

Long-term results of treatment of malignant carcinoid syndrome with prolonged release Lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel)

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues are the mainstay of therapy for malignant carcinoid syndrome. There is clear evidence that the once monthly intramuscular formulation, Octreotide LAR, controls symptoms of carcinoid syndrome, and recent data also suggests an antitumour effect. There is limited data on prolonged release Lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel, Ipsen Pharma Biotech, Signes, France) and no long-term data to date.

AIM

To present long-term results of prolonged release Lanreotide in a large cohort of patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome, assessing clinical and objective response and tolerance.

METHODS

Seventy six patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumours and carcinoid syndrome were included in this 9-year retrospective study. Clinical response was based on symptom score with radiological assessment based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours).

RESULTS

Data were available in 69 patients. Ninety four percent achieved symptomatic response at first follow-up visit. Forty six percent had loss of symptomatic response, but 44% of these achieved control with an increase in dose of prolonged release Lanreotide. Overall, symptoms were well controlled throughout the study period with prolonged release Lanreotide alone in 74% of patients. Twenty six percent required additional treatment despite good initial response. Only 30% demonstrated radiological progression. Eleven patients who were switched from Octreotide LAR had return of symptomatic control. No significant adverse effects were experienced.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged release Lanreotide provides good symptomatic control of diarrhoea and flushing as well as tumour stability in patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors have been steadily growing in incidence and prevalence during the last two decades, showing an incidence of 4-5/1,000,000 population. They represent a heterogeneous group with very varying tumor biology and prognosis. About half of the patients present clinical symptoms and syndromes related to substances released from the tumors (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, insulinoma, glucagonoma, etc) and the other half are so-called nonfunctioning tumors mainly presenting with symptoms such as obstruction, jaundice, bleeding, and abdominal mass. Ten percent to 15% of the pancreatic endocrine tumors are part of an inherited syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatosis, or tuberousclerosis. The diagnosis is based on histopathology demonstrating neuroendocrine features such as positive staining for chromogranin A and specific hormones such as gastrin, proinsulin, and glucagon. Moreover, the biochemical diagnosis includes measurement of chromogranins A and B or specific hormones such as gastrin, insulin, glucagon, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the circulation. In addition to standard localization procedures, radiology (computed tomography [CT] scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and most recently positron emission tomography with specific isotopes such as (11)C-5 hydroxytryptamin ((11)C-5-HTP), fluorodopa and (68)Ga-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-octreotate are performed. Surgery is still one of the cornerstones in the management of pancreatic endocrine tumors, but curative surgery is rarely obtained in most cases because of metastatic disease. Debulking and other cytoreductive procedures might facilitate systemic treatment. Cytotoxic drugs, biological agents, such as somatostatin analogs, alpha interferons, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are routinely used. Tumor-targeted radioactive treatment is available in many centres in Europe and is effective in patients with tumors that express high content of somatostatin receptors type 2 and 5. In the future, treatment will be based on tumor biology and molecular genetics with the aim of so-called personalized medicine.

Liver-specific therapies for metastases of neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors

The presence or development of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors is the most important prognostic factor. Liver resection, transplantation and many different therapeutic approaches are discussed in this special review.

Antiproliferative effect of somatostatin analogs in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin analogs were initially developed for the control of hormonal syndromes associated with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In recent years, accumulating data has supported their role as antiproliferative agents, capable of stabilizing tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine malignancies, including carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors. A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial has now demonstrated that octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) 30 mg can significantly prolong time to tumor progression among patients with metastatic midgut NETs regardless of functional status, chromogranin A level or age. In addition to significantly lengthening time to tumor progression in the overall study population, subset analysis suggests that patients with low tumor burden are most likely to experience disease stabilization with octreotide LAR 30 mg, supporting the early use of octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic disease. Further research efforts are underway to evaluate the use of somatostatin analogs as antiproliferative agents in other types of gastroenteropancreatic-NETs. Ongoing studies are also evaluating novel somatostatin analogs and somatostatin analogs in combination with other anti-tumor therapies.

Tumors of the Pancreatic Body and Tail

Tumors of the pancreatic body and tail are uncommon. They have a propensity to present late and often attain a large size with local invasion before they produce any clinical symptoms. The current review aims at comprehensively analysing these tumors with respect to their pathology, presentation, the investigation of these tumors, and finally the latest trends in their surgical and medical management.

Chromogranin A--biological function and clinical utility in neuro endocrine tumor disease

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a form of cancer that differ from other neoplasia in that they synthesize, store, and secrete peptides, e.g., chromogranin A (CgA) and amines. A critical issue is late diagnosis due to failure to identify symptoms or to establish the biochemical diagnosis. We review here the utility of CgA measurement in NETs and describe its biological role and the clinical value of its measurement.

METHODS

Literature review and analysis of the utility of plasma/serum CgA measurements in NETs and other diseases.

RESULTS

CgA is a member of the chromogranin family; its transcription and peptide processing are well characterized, but its precise function remains unknown. Levels are detectable in the circulation but vary substantially (approximately 25%) depending on which assay is used. Serum and plasma measurements are concordant. CgA is elevated in approximately 90% of gut NETs and correlates with tumor burden and recurrence. Highest values are noted in ileal NETs and gastrointestinal NETs associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Both functioning and nonfunctioning pancreatic NETs have elevated values. CgA is more frequently elevated in well-differentiated tumors compared to poorly differentiated NETs. Effective treatment is often associated with decrease in CgA levels. Proton pump inhibitors falsely increase CgA, but levels normalize with therapy cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

CgA is currently the best available biomarker for the diagnosis of NETs. It is critical to establish diagnosis and has some utility in predicting disease recurrence, outcome, and efficacy of therapy. Measurement of plasma CgA is mandatory for the effective diagnosis and management of NET disease.

Somatostatin analogues in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, current aspects and new perspectives

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) are rare tumours that present many clinical features.They secrete peptides and neuroamines that cause distinct clinical syndromes, including carcinoid syndrome. However, many are clinically silent until late presentation with mass effects.In 2000 the WHO developed a new classification which gives a better description of the characteristics and biological behaviour of the tumour.Surgical resection is the treatment of first choice for a patient with a GEP NET. In metastatic disease multiple therapeutic approaches are possible. In these cases the goal is to improve quality of life and to extent survival.GEP NETs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which are bound by somatostatin (SST) or its synthetic analogues, although the subtypes and number of SSTRs expressed is very variable.Somatostatin analogues are used frequently to control hormone-related symptoms while their anti-neoplastic activity, even if it has not been widely studied and the regarding data are discordant, seems to result prevalently in tumour stabilisation.A few patients who fail to respond or cease to respond to standard SST analogues treatment seem to have a response to higher doses of these drugs.The use of higher doses of somatostatin analogues or the development of new subtype selective agonists and chimaeric somatostatin analogues, or pan-somatostatin will probably improve the clinical management of these patients.This review provides an update on the use of somatostatin analogues in the management of GEP NETs and discusses novel clinical strategies based on SSTR 2 gene transfer therapy.

Octreotide LAR: safety and tolerability issues

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues are the cornerstone in therapy of acromegaly and functioning neuroendocrine tumors. Long-acting retard formulations have improved patient survival and contributed considerably to quality of life. The first such compound was octreotide LAR ('long-acting release'), characterized by high affinity to somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5, which has to be injected intramuscularly every 4 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to screen all octreotide LAR-related literature and assess the compound's profile for safety and tolerability.

METHODS

An extensive literature search has been performed using the MEDLINE database to retrieve data from clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of octreotide LAR.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Octreotide LAR is well tolerated; however, diarrhea and gallstone formation were identified as the main adverse events. Impairment of glucose homeostasis was a regular phenomenon, but its occurrence was unpredictable. General side effects such as headache, abdominal discomfort or fatigue were also reported. According to incidental case reports, administration during pregnancy appears to be safe for both mother and child; however, definitive evidence is missing. In addition, octreotide LAR has been evaluated for further indications including treatment of solid tumor entities, due to its antiproliferative effect. Currently, several compounds (lanreotide, SOM230) with a broader receptor spectrum are under evaluation and may improve treatment efficacy and lower incidence of side effects.

Long-term results of patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome receiving octreotide LAR

BACKGROUND

Octreotide LAR is an established treatment for malignant carcinoid syndrome. However, studies with large number of patients and long follow-up are lacking.

AIM

To present long-terms results with octreotide LAR, assessing duration of clinical and objective response and treatment tolerance, in a large, homogeneous cohort of patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumours were included in this 8-year study. Clinical evaluation was based on a symptom score. Radiological assessment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 108 patients, 24% had a sustained symptomatic response. In the remaining patients, loss of symptomatic response with the initial dose was noted within 3-60 months. In 17% of them, symptoms were controlled by just an increase of octreotide LAR dose, whilst the other patients required additional treatment. Overall, in 45.3% of patients, symptoms were well controlled during the study period with only octreotide LAR, and no additional treatment was required. No significant adverse effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide LAR treatment provides a sustained symptomatic response in about half of the patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome and contributes to disease stabilization for a longer period than previously described.

Management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors with hepatic metastasis

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in general and specifically these gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors often present a considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, especially those that behave in an aggressive fashion. The majority of tumors are diagnosed at a stage that the only curative treatment, radical surgical intervention, is no longer an option and thus long-term therapy with somatostatin analogs is focused on symptom amelioration and in the improvement of quality of life. Although biotherapy is currently the most efficient treatment to achieve palliation, conventional chemotherapy may have some utility in undifferentiated or highly proliferating neuroendocrine carcinomas and pancreatic NETs. Hepatic metastases, depending on size, location, and number may be amenable to surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation. If surgery is not feasible, embolization either alone (bland), in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, or using radioactive microspheres can be used. Peptide receptor targeted radiotherapy using radiolabeled octapeptide analogs (Yttrium or Lutetium-octreotide) may lead to reduction in tumor size, but in most circumstances has a tumor stabilizing effect. A variety of antiangiogenesis and growth factor-targeted agents have been evaluated, but to date, the results have failed to meet our expectations.

Pharmacotherapy of neuroendocrine cancers

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the diffuse neuroendocrine cell system often present a considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

METHODS

We have reviewed the literature on NET treatment between 1979 and 2008 (PubMed search: carcinoid or neuroendocrine tumor/tumour + treatment or management), and summarized current therapeutic options and recommendations.

RESULTS

The majority of tumors are diagnosed at a stage that the only curative treatment, radical surgical intervention, is no longer an option. Biotherapy with somatostatin analogs is currently the most efficient treatment to achieve palliation. The interferon class of agents may have a role in selected individuals but substantial adverse events often limit their use. Conventional chemotherapy has minimal efficacy but may have some utility in undifferentiated or highly proliferating neuroendocrine carcinomas and pancreatic NETs. Hepatic metastases, depending on size, location and number, may be amenable to surgical resection, embolization or radio-frequency ablation. Peptide receptor targeted radiotherapy may lead to reduction in tumor size but in most circumstances has a tumor-stabilizing effect. A variety of antiangiogenesis and growth factor-targeted agents have been evaluated but to date the results have failed to meet expectations. Thus, long-acting somatostatin analogs remain the only effective pharmacotherapeutic option that improves symptomatology and quality of life with minimal adverse effects.

Surgical management and palliative treatment in bronchial neuroendocrine tumours: a clinical study of 45 patients

Bronchial neuroendocrine tumours account for 1-2% of all lung cancers; they are thought to arise from the neuroendocrine cells located in the bronchial mucosa. The majority of the literature available comprises surgical series and there is a scarcity of data available for the management of patients with inoperable disease. We present a series of 45 patients referred to our institution from 1998 to 2006, with a mean follow-up of 54 months. Histological diagnosis from our department was available for 39 patients, with the remainder having had histological assessment performed previously. Typical carcinoid was present in 25 cases, atypical in 9 cases, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in 4 and 1 case of small cell lung carcinoma. All patients were staged at time of initial diagnosis with CT scan, in addition Octreoscans were performed when appropriate. Twenty-six of these 45 cases had unresectable disease, whilst the remainder were treated with surgical resection. Initial therapy with surgical resection was performed in 19 patients, 2 of whom had undergone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Recurrence occurred in 7 (36.8%), average duration of disease-free survival post-surgery was 61 months. Chemotherapy was first line therapy in five cases, four achieved disease stabilization and one case had progressive disease. Somatostatin analogues were used as first line therapy in six patients, for symptom control and anti-tumour effect. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, with Yttrium-90 DOTA-Octreotate, was given in two cases, both of whom achieved disease stabilization for 9-12 months respectively. There was a significant difference between Stage 4 and Stage 1 disease at presentation and survival. In conclusion curative surgical resection is treatment of choice, however, chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy offers palliation improving both symptoms and mortality.

The role of somatostatin analogues in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours belong to a heterogeneous family of neoplasms, originating in endocrine glands (such as the pituitary, parathyroid or the neuroendocrine adrenal glands), in endocrine islets (within the thyroid or pancreas) as well as in endocrine cells dispersed between exocrine cells throughout the digestive or respiratory tracts. The clinical behaviour of neuroendocrine tumours is variable; they may be functioning or not functioning, ranging from well-differentiated slow growing neuroendocrine tumours to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, which are highly aggressive malignant tumours. The development of somatostatin analogues as important diagnostic and treatment tools have revolutionised the clinical management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours. However, although symptomatic relief and stabilisation of tumour growth for various periods of time are observed in many patients treated with somatostatin analogues, tumour regression is rare. Development of new somatostatin analogues and new drug combination therapies should further improve the clinical management of these patients.

Glucagonoma Syndrome: Survival 21 Years With Concurrent Liver Metastases

A patient who survived for 21 years since initial discovery of glucagonoma with concurrent liver metastases is described. Psychiatric symptoms, weight loss, necrolytic migratory erythema, diarrhea, and diabetes mellitus developed gradually after diagnosis of the tumor. No specific treatment was administered. The longevity of this patient may be related to the slow tumor growth expressed histologically by ischemic necrosis of the malignant cells and in imaging by extensive tumor calcifications, a very rare finding in this type of the tumor.

Cyto-reduction of neuroendocrine tumours using Sandostatin LAR in combination with Infergen: results of a case series

Historically, limited trials evaluating biotherapy in treating metastatic neuroendocrine tumours have yielded mixed results. In this study, the efficacy of a novel combination therapy featuring longacting Sandostatin LAR plus alpha-interferon was evaluated. In a prospective case series, 12 patients with unresectable metastatic neuroendocrine tumours refractory to treatment initiated therapy with Infergen and Sandostatin LAR. Radiological response was followed serially at 3-month intervals. A biochemical response was considered significant if marker levels decreased by > or = 50% compared with baseline. Inhibition of tumour growth lasting for greater than 3 months (mean response 22.6+/-17.7 months) was seen in eight patients. Complete tumour regression was observed in one patient, lasting for 40 months; three patients exhibited partial tumour regression (mean response 29.3+/-24.0 months), and four patients maintained a stable tumour response (mean response 13.3+/-9.2 months). Four patients showed no response to therapy (mean response 5.0+/-6.0 months). All enrolled patients are alive currently. The biochemical response seen in seven patients did not correlate with the radiological response. These results suggest that the novel combination of longacting Sandostatin LAR with an alpha-interferon may be at least as effective as either combination therapy with short-acting octreotide or monotherapy with Sandostatin LAR.