A comparison of two airway aids for emergency use by unskilled personnel. The Combitube and laryngeal mask

Evaluation of the SLIPA™ (Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway), a Single Use Supraglottic Airway Device, in 60 Anaesthetized Patients Undergoing Minor Surgical Procedures

The Streamlined Liner of the Pharyngeal Airway, SLIPA™ (Hudson RCI) is a new disposable supraglottic airway device that has no inflatable cuff and has features designed to reduce aspiration risk. This study aimed to assess the insertion success and effectiveness of the SLIPA™ in 60 patients who presented for elective surgery. Ethics committee approval was obtained. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years, had not provided written consent or were at risk of pulmonary aspiration. The first 20 SLIPA™ were inserted by the principal investigator (Group A) followed by another 40 inserted by medical officers and anaesthetists of varying experience (Group B). Twenty-one males and 39 females were recruited into the study. Median time to ventilation was 20.4 seconds in Group A (range 12.9-109) and 24.8 seconds in Group B (range 8.2-82.5). Overall success rate was 100% in Group A and 92.5% in Group B. The lowest recorded SpO2 was 91% in Group B. The incidence of blood and sore throat score >3 (0-10 scale) was 23% and 7% respectively (Groups A and B). Group B reported that use of the device was very easy in 16%, easy in 76%, difficult in 5%, and very difficult in 3%. The SLIPA™ proved to be a reliable airway providing adequate ventilation in both spontaneous breathing and assisted respiration. Most users found the SLIPA™ to be easy or very easy to use.

Prehospital use in emergency patients of a laryngeal mask airway by ambulance paramedics is a safe and effective alternative for endotracheal intubation

BACKGROUND

In Dutch ambulance practice, failure or inability to intubate patients with altered oxygenation and/or ventilation leaves bag-valve mask ventilation as the only alternative, which is undesirable for patient outcome. A novel Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme (LMA-S) device may be a suitable alternative.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and suitability of the LMA-S for emergency medical services in daily out-of-hospital emergency practice.

METHODS

After a period of theoretical and practical training of ambulance paramedics in the use of the LMA-S, prospective data were collected on the utilisation of LMA-S in an observational study. Procedures for use were standardised and the evaluation included the number of direct intubation attempts before using LMA-S, attempts required, failure rate and the adequacy of ventilation. Data were analysed taking patient characteristics such as age and indication for ventilatory support into account.

RESULTS

The LMA-S was used 50 times over a period of 9 months (33 involving cardiorespiratory arrest, 14 primary and three rescue). The LMA-S could be applied successfully in all 50 cases (100%) and was successful in the first attempt in 49 patients (98%). Respiratory parameters showed adequate oxygenation. All paramedics were unanimously positive about the utilisation of LMA-S because of the easiness of the effort of insertion and general use, and emphasised its value as a useful resource for patients in need.

CONCLUSIONS

Ensuring ventilation support by using LMA-S by paramedics in prehospital emergency practice is safe and effective.

Does a 4 diagram manual enable laypersons to operate the Laryngeal Mask Supreme®? A pilot study in the manikin

Background

Bystander resuscitation plays an important role in lifesaving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A significant reduction in the "no-flow-time", quantitatively better chest compressions and an improved quality of ventilation can be demonstrated during CPR using supraglottic airway devices (SADs). Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of inexperienced persons to operate SADs after brief instruction. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether an instruction manual consisting of four diagrams enables laypersons to operate a Laryngeal Mask Supreme^® (LMAS) in the manikin.

Methods

An instruction manual of four illustrations with speech bubbles displaying the correct use of the LMAS was designed. Laypersons were handed a bag containing a LMAS, a bag mask valve device (BMV), a syringe prefilled with air and the instruction sheet, and were asked to perform and ventilate the manikin as displayed. Time to ventilation was recorded and degree of success evaluated.

Results

A total of 150 laypersons took part. Overall 145 participants (96.7%) inserted the LMAS in the manikin in the right direction. The device was inserted inverted or twisted in 13 (8.7%) attempts. Eight (5.3%) individuals recognized this and corrected the position. Within the first 2 minutes 119 (79.3%) applicants were able to insert the LMAS and provide tidal volumes greater than 150 ml (estimated dead space). Time to insertion and first ventilation was 83.2 ± 29 s. No significant difference related to previous BLS training (P = 0.85), technical education (P = 0.07) or gender could be demonstrated (P = 0.25).

Conclusion

In manikin laypersons could insert LMAS in the correct direction after onsite instruction by a simple manual with a high success rate. This indicates some basic procedural understanding and intellectual transfer in principle. Operating errors (n = 91) were frequently not recognized and corrected (n = 77). Improvements in labeling and the quality of instructional photographs may reduce individual error and may optimize understanding.

Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

The goal of therapy for bradycardia or tachycardia is to rapidly identify and treat patients who are hemodynamically unstable or symptomatic due to the arrhythmia. Drugs or, when appropriate, pacing may be used to control unstable or symptomatic bradycardia. Cardioversion or drugs or both may be used to control unstable or symptomatic tachycardia. ACLS providers should closely monitor stable patients pending expert consultation and should be prepared to aggressively treat those with evidence of decompensation.

The EasyTube for Airway Management in Emergencies

BACKGROUND

The EasyTube (EzT) is a new sterile, disposable airway device approved by the European Union in February 2003 and by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in January 2005. The two-lumen design of the EzT enables it to be used as an endotracheal tube or as a supraglottic emergency airway.

OBJECTIVE

To report the preliminary experiences with the EzT airway device in prehospital and in-hospital emergency airway management procedures.

METHODS

All airway management procedures involving the EzT were recorded for a period of 18 months.

RESULTS

The EzT was successfully used to intubate 15 patients with unanticipated airway difficulties during either anesthesia induction or prehospital airway management. In all patients, the EzT was positioned successfully in the first attempt, within a median time of 31 seconds until start of ventilation. Effective supraglottic ventilation and oxygenation was achieved within 25 to 40 seconds. In three patients, the EzT needed one additional repositioning maneuver. On removal of the EzT, no blood was observed on the surface of the device, as a sign of absence of potential mucosal lesion. No injuries were observed in the mouth, pharynx, or esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

The first experiences with the use of the EzT are promising. In emergency airway management procedures presenting problems, the device successfully established sufficient ventilation and oxygenation. Further studies are needed to compare its value with those of other supraglottic devices.

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by critical care nurses in children

The laryngeal mask airway is included as a first line airway device during adult resuscitation by first responders. However, there is little evidence for its role in paediatric resuscitation. Using anaesthetised children as a model for paediatric cardiopulmonary arrest, we compared the ability of critical care nurses to manually ventilate the anaesthetised child via the laryngeal mask airway compared with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway. The airway devices were inserted in random order and chest expansion was measured using an ultrasound distance transducer. The critical care nurses were able to place the laryngeal mask airway and achieve successful ventilation in 82% of children compared to 70% using the facemask and oropharyngeal airway, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.136). The median time to first successful breath using the laryngeal mask airway was 39 s compared to 25 s using the facemask (p < 0.001). In this group of nurses, we did not show a difference in ventilation via a laryngeal mask airway or facemask, although facemask ventilation was achieved more quickly.

Alternative airway devices for use in children requiring prehospital airway management: update and case discussion

This manuscript reviews the latest literature on alternative airways for use in children requiring prehospital airway management. Case discussions serve as a springboard for discussion of alternatives to bag-mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation for management of ventilation in infants and children in the prehospital setting. Few airway procedures have been studied with any rigor in this setting, and most of the data that are available are extrapolated from adults. Laryngeal mask airway may be the best alternative airway with the most promise to add to the armamentarium of the prehospital provider, but no controlled trial to date has been conducted.

Airway Management in Critical Illness

Airway management in the ICU can be complicated due to many factors including the limited physiologic reserve of the patient. As a consequence, the likelihood of difficult mask ventilation and intubation increases. The incidence of failed airways and of cardiac arrest related to airway instrumentation in the ICU is much higher than that of elective intubations performed in the operating room. A thorough working knowledge of the devices available for the management of the difficult airway and recommended rescue strategies is paramount in avoiding bad patient outcomes. In this review, we will provide a conceptual framework for airway assessment, with an emphasis on assessment of the patient with limited cervical spine movement or injury and of morbidly obese patients. Furthermore, we will review the devices that are available for airway management in the ICU, and discuss controversies surrounding interventions like cricoid pressure and the use of muscle relaxants in the critically ill patient. Finally, strategies for the safe extubation of patients with known difficult airways will be provided.

Needle vs surgical cricothyroidotomy: a short cut to effective ventilation

Cricothyroidotomy can be performed using three techniques. This literature review seeks to determine which is more appropriate for use in prehospital can't intubate/can't ventilate scenarios where laryngeal mask airways prove ineffective. The common approach of inserting a 14-gauge cannula and using low-pressure ventilation via intermittent occlusion of an opening in oxygen tubing (15 l x min(-1) flow) results in ineffective ventilation within 60 s or less, depending on the degree of airway obstruction. In the absence of a high degree of upper airway obstruction, ventilation can be effective if the cannula is attached to a high pressure (45 psi) jet ventilator, but such devices are rare in UK prehospital practice. A self-inflating bag used with a cuffed tube inserted through a horizontal scalpel incision provides sustained adequate ventilation, has a relatively low complication rate compared to needle cricothyroidotomy and is a skill that can be easily taught to paramedics, nurses and doctors.

Infraglottic airway devices and techniques

Airway management involves far more than just proficiency with tracheal intubation techniques. There are several infraglottic techniques available and the method chosen will depend on the accessibility of equipment, the level of training and expertise, and the patient's specific injury or disease. Endotracheal intubation is most commonly performed by direct laryngoscopy. Several modifications of laryngoscope blades and a variety of adjuncts such as bougies may help to accomplish even a difficult airway. Rigid intubation fibrescopes do improve the view of the larynx, especially in patients with difficult anatomy. They also permit tracheal intubation with less head and cervical spine movement than is often generated by direct laryngoscopy. Successful intubation, however, requires considerable experience, as in intubation techniques using flexible fibrescopes. Both the EasyTube and the Combitube serve as an infraglottic or a supraglottic airway. The tip of the EasyTube resembles the one of an endotracheal tube, whereas the Combitube is much more bulky.

Should there be a change in the teaching of airway management in the medical school curriculum?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), the oesophageal-tracheal combitube (ETC) and the tracheal tube (TT) by medical students, with a view to recommend changes to the medical school curriculum.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 93 third-year medical students were taught the use of LMA, ETC and TT on manikins and had their skills tested at 0 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Overall, LMA insertion was the fastest technique with a mean time taken for successful insertion of 32.2 s, compared to that for ETC (55.0 s, P = 0.000) and TT (71.5s, P = 0.000). There was a significant delay in the time taken for insertion at 6 months for all three devices: 13.5 s for the LMA (P = 0.000), 29.6 s for the ETC (P = 0.000) and 31.8 s for the TT (P = 0.001). Both the ETC and the TT had a significantly lower first-attempt success rate at 6 months (ETC: 91% versus 63%, P = 0.000 and TT: 80% versus 55%, P = 0.003) but not the LMA (96% versus 92%, P = 0.549). At 6 months, the overall success rate was 99% for the LMA, 100% for the ETC and 93% for the TT. Complication rate was higher for the ETC (9% versus 46%, P = 0.000) and the TT (38% versus 78%, P = 0.005) but not for the LMA (3% versus 10%, P = 0.688).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the TT is difficult and the skills acquired by the medical students deteriorate significantly over time. The LMA and the ETC seem to have an advantage over the TT in that they are more easily learnt and the skills better retained. It is recommended that these alternative devices be included in the medical school curriculum for airway management.

Assessing resident skills in the use of rescue airway devices

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Airway control is a vital procedure for the specialty of emergency medicine. Although endotracheal intubation is the preferred method to obtain a definitive airway, several devices have been developed to help physicians handle a difficult or failed intubation. Using a bench model, we assessed the efficacy of an advanced airway training program.

METHODS

Residents of an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited 3-year emergency medicine residency program participated in an advanced airway course. Psychomotor skills were assessed for the laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask airway (Fastrac), and Combitube (esophageal-tracheal twin-lumen airway device). The outcome variable was the time necessary to successfully insert and ventilate an airway mannequin. The skills were assessed at 0, 6, and 12 months after training. Information including previous and interval experience with these devices was recorded.

RESULTS

The airway mannequin was successfully ventilated using the laryngeal mask airway, Fastrac, and Combitube in 6.9, 51.0, and 21.5 seconds, respectively. There was a modest interval increase in mean time required to place the laryngeal mask airway and Combitube at 6 and 12 months after training. A decrease was noted in the time to place the Fastrac. Previous and interval experience did not affect performance.

CONCLUSION

Airway competency is a key component of emergency medicine training. Training should include mastery of rescue devices for the failed or difficult airway. Our findings suggest that emergency medicine residents can learn and retain these airway skills.

Patient safety in emergency airway management and rapid sequence intubation: metaphorical lessons from skydiving

Concern about patient safety and failed rapid sequence intubation has led to an increased awareness of potentially difficult laryngoscopy situations and algorithms promoting techniques in awake patients. Given the low overall incidence of failed laryngoscopy, however, prediction of difficult laryngoscopy has poor positive predictive value and uncertain clinical utility, especially in emergency settings. Non-rapid sequence intubation approaches have comparatively lower chances of intubation success, require more time, and are associated with more complications. As a specialty, emergency medicine has adopted rapid sequence intubation as the mainstay of emergency airway treatment for many appropriate reasons; the problem that must be addressed is how patient safety can be ensured while what is an inherently dangerous procedure is performed. A novel way to conceptualize patient risk and safety issues in rapid sequence intubation is to examine how inherent risk is managed in skydiving. Metaphorical lessons from skydiving that are applicable to rapid sequence intubation include (1) a redundancy of safety; (2) a methodic approach to primary chute deployment; (3) use of backup chutes that are fast, simple, and easy to deploy; (4) attention to monitoring; and (5) equipment vigilance. This article reviews how each of these lessons apply metaphorically to rapid sequence intubation, wherein the primary chute is laryngoscopy, the backup chute is rescue ventilation, and monitoring involves pulse oximetry.

Management of the difficult airway: alternative airway techniques and adjuncts

Rapid-sequence intubation using conventional laryngoscopic technique remains the standard of airway management in emergency medicine and continues to have a success rate of approximately 98%. Preparation and proper intubation technique must be optimized at the initial attempt using direct laryngoscopy. Failure causes multiple repeated attempts, leading to a failed airway. Each repeated attempt increases the likelihood of bleeding, oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal edema, and malposition, causing decreased visualization of the glottic opening, equipment failure, and hypoxia. Preparation must be an ongoing process. Faulty suction, no oxygen source, choice of the wrong laryngoscopic blade or ETT, poor light source, or misplaced equipment can domino into mechanical failure. Intubation equipment stations must be inventoried constantly, organized, and kept simple in their layout to decrease confusion during selection. Medication for sedation and paralysis should be readily available and not kept distant from the intubation station in a medication-dispensing unit that would require time for acquisition. Proper positioning of the patient remains paramount for alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axis to provide optimal visualization of the vocal cords. Proper technique during insertion of the laryngoscope blade in the oral cavity for displacement of the tongue must be ensured. Without proper technique, even with proper positioning, the glottic opening cannot be visualized. Laryngeal pressure to maneuver the larynx into position should be exerted initially by the laryngoscopist's right hand and, when in view, maintained by an assistant to free the laryngoscopist's hand for ETT insertion. With preparation and proper technique, the first attempt is the best attempt, and the vicious cycle of multiple attempts and complications will be averted.

The intubating laryngeal-mask airway may be an ideal device for airway control in the rural trauma patient

A review of the literature on advanced airway management indicates that the intubating laryngeal-mask airway (ILMA) may be an ideal device for airway control in the rural trauma patient. The ILMA is an advanced laryngeal-mask airway designed to allow oxygenation of the unconscious patient as well as blind tracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube. The ILMA is an easy-to-use airway with a high success rate of insertion, and requires little training. For the rural physician managing a difficult airway in a trauma patient, the ILMA has been found to be reliable and successful when other techniques fail, such as fiberoptic intubation and direct laryngoscopy. The ILMA has also been reported to cause less hemodynamic change and less injury to the teeth and lips than direct laryngoscopy. Further, the ILMA was found to be easier and faster to use with a higher success rate than either the combitube or endotracheal tube for unskilled healthcare providers. Limitations and complications of the ILMA may include aspiration, esophageal intubation, damage to the larynx or other tissues during blind passage of a tracheal tube, and edema of the epiglottis.

The Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube

The ETC is an easily inserted, double-lumen/double-balloon supraglottic airway device. The major indication of the ETC is as a back-up device for airway management. It is an excellent option for rescue ventilation in both in- and out-of-the-hospital environments and in situations of difficult ventilation and intubation. It is useful especially in patients with massive airway bleeding or limited access to the airway and in patients in whom neck movement is contraindicated. Continued airway management with an ETC that has been placed is a reasonable option in many cases. Having thus secured the airway, it may not be necessary to abort the anesthetic or to continue with further airway management efforts. In order to avoid serious trauma to the esophagus or airway, redesigning the ETC using a softer material for the tube is advisable.

Airway and ventilation management

Airway management is fundamental to ACLS. Success with any airway device relies as much on the operator's experience and skill as on the device itself. The purpose of using an airway device is to provide a patent route for ventilating the lungs and to protect against pulmonary aspiration. Training should emphasize the importance of confirming that the airway device is positioned correctly and that the lungs can be ventilated effectively. If airway intervention is to have a positive effect on outcome, the choice of airway device is less important than thorough training, ongoing experience and review, and close attention to complications. Regardless of whether a provider chooses to use the LMA, the combitube, or the tracheal tube, providers must be familiar with more than one method of airway management because of the possibility of failure to insert or ventilate with their primary airway device of choice.

The use of the laryngeal mask airway and Combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation; a national survey

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Combitube have been recommended for use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). An overview of current practice was sought by conducting a postal survey of 265 Resuscitation Training Departments, at different hospitals, throughout the UK. One hundred fifty-three (58%) completed questionnaires were returned. Only 38 (25%) hospitals which replied were currently using the LMA in resuscitation while seven (5%) were using the Combitube. The reasons for not using these airway adjuvants included concerns about airway protection, difficulties in training, cost, and the concept that when anaesthetists were available on cardiac arrest teams these devices were unnecessary.

Use of the esophageal tracheal combitube by basic emergency medical technicians

The most appropriate airway device for use in EMS systems staffed by basic skilled EMTs with (EMT-Ds) or without (EMT-Bs) defibrillation capabilities is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube (ETC) when used by EMT-Ds in cardiorespiratory arrest patients of all etiologies. The EMTs had automatic external defibrillator (AED) training but no prior advanced airway technique skills. The prehospital intervention was reviewed using the EMTs cardiac arrest report, the AED tape recording of the event and the assessment of the receiving emergency physician. The patients' hospital records and autopsy report were reviewed in search of complications. Eight hundred and thirty-one adult cardiac arrest patients were studied. Placement was successful in 725 (95.4%) of the 760 patients where it was attempted and ventilation was successful in 695 (91.4%). Immediate complications encountered, but not necessarily related to the use of the ETC, were; subcutaneous emphysema (18), tension pneumothorax (5), blood in the oropharynx (15), and swelling of the pharynx (three). An autopsy was done in 133 patients; no esophageal lesions or significant injury to the airway structures were observed. Our results suggest that EMT-Ds can use the ETC for control of the airway and ventilation in cardiorespiratory arrest patients safely and effectively.

Laryngeal mask vs intubating laryngeal mask: insertion and ventilation by inexperienced resuscitators

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has been shown to be useful in airway maintenance during resuscitation. The intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) is a modified LMA permitting both ventilation and rapid endotracheal intubation. We aimed to compare the LMA and the ILM with regard to ease of insertion and successful ventilation by inexperienced personnel. We have used anaesthetized, apnoeic, non-paralysed patients as a model to simulate resuscitation. Following standardized training, non-anaesthetic medical staff with no previous experience in laryngeal mask airway insertion (novices) inserted either the LMA or ILM in 55 patients following induction of anaesthesia. There were no differences between the two patient groups included in our study with regard to mean age and body mass index (BMI). The success rate for inserting the airway device and achieving a significant end-tidal CO2 recording within two minutes was 23/28 for the LMA (82.1%) and 22/27 for the ILM (81.5%). Reasons for failure included inability to insert the ILM past the teeth and insertion of the LMA upside down. There were no clinically relevant differences in the mean time to airway insertion and successful ventilation (62.6 vs 62 seconds) or expired tidal volume (781 vs 767 ml) for the LMA and ILM respectively. We conclude that the ILM is as easily inserted and effectively used as an LMA by novices and, because it allows the option offacilitating endotracheal intubation, may be the preferred device for maintaining an airway during resuscitation.

Respiratory failure after tracheal extubation in a patient with halo frame cervical spine immobilization--rescue therapy using the Combitube airway

A 78-yr-old man, with halo frame cervical spine immobilization, suffered rapid respiratory deterioration after tracheal extubation in the intensive care unit. Control of the airway was difficult as bag-valve-mask ventilation was ineffective, tracheal intubation was known to be difficult from management of a previous episode of respiratory failure on the ward, and laryngeal mask insertion proved impossible. Rescue therapy using a Combitube airway is described and discussed.

The laryngeal mask airway: a comprehensive review for the Emergency Physician

The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) was developed in the 1980s, but has only recently begun to be used in Emergency Medicine. The LMA affords effective assisted ventilation without requiring endotracheal intubation or visualization of the glottis. In doing so, it is more efficacious than a bag-valve-mask apparatus, although the risk of aspiration of gastric contents persists, particularly if the device is not properly placed. The LMA also has significant potential utility in management of the difficult airway. Most reported clinical experience with the LMA has come from the operating room. This article provides an overview of the extensive potential utility of the LMA in the Emergency Department and prehospital settings as well as a comprehensive review of the pertinent advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with its use.

Aspiration in transtracheal oxygen insufflation with different insufflation flow rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs

We investigated whether transtracheal insufflation of oxygen with different insufflation flow rates protects against aspiration of gastric contents during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Its ventilation and oxygenation effects were also evaluated. Cardiac arrest was induced in anesthetized and paralyzed 18 mongrel dogs. Chest compression using an automatic thumper was performed while the dogs randomly received no mechanical ventilation (Group I, n = 6) or were transtracheally insufflated with 4 L/min oxygen (Group II, n = 6) or 10 L/min oxygen (Group III, n = 6). Blood samples were drawn every 5 min for 20 min for blood gas analysis. the mouths of the dogs were then filled with 70 mL mixed barium, and 10 min after chest compression, chest radiographs were taken to evaluate the incidence of pulmonary aspiration. Results showed that pulmonary aspiration occurred in all dogs of Group I and three of the six dogs in Group II, whereas dogs in Group III were free from pulmonary aspiration. Both transtracheal oxygen insufflation groups maintained oxygen saturation significantly better than Group I, but mild hypercapnia was observed in all groups after 20 min of CPR. We conclude that transtracheal oxygen insufflation, but not chest compression alone, was able to maintain oxygenation for 20 min during CPR in dogs with cardiac arrest. Mild hypercapnia was noted in all groups. Chest compression alone caused pulmonary aspiration, whereas insufflation of 10 L O(2)/min provided better protection against pulmonary aspiration than that of 4 L O(2)/min.

Neurologic Intensive Care Unit Catastrophes: Airway, Breathing, and Circulation

When a catastrophic change in a patient occurs during the treatment of an underlying neurologic illness, management must be initiated to prevent secondary organ injury as disease specific treatment begins. Patients should be intubated, ventilated, and perfused, regardless of disease etiology or subsequent specific treatment.

Emergency airway management by intensive care unit nurses with the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube

When using the laryngeal tube and the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), the medium-size (maximum volume 1100 ml) versus adult (maximum volume 1500 ml) self-inflating bags resulted in significantly lower lung tidal volumes. No gastric inflation occurred when using both devices with either ventilation bag. The newly developed medium-size self-inflating bag may be an option to further reduce the risk of gastric inflation while maintaining sufficient lung ventilation. Both the ILMA and laryngeal tube proved to be valid alternatives for emergency airway management in the experimental model used.

A case report of difficult ventilation with the Combitube - valve-like upper airway obstruction confirmed by fibreoptic visualisation

This case report describes difficulty with ventilation because of valve-like upper airway obstruction by aryepiglottic folds after uncomplicated insertion of a Combitube in a 30-year-old female patient. After correct (oesophageal) placement increased ventilation pressures occurred and a fibreoptic device was used to investigate the cause. Valve-like obstruction was discovered and subsequently observed during controlled ventilation. After removal of the Combitube and mask ventilation no valve mechanism was seen. This effect appeared to be due to an increased air stream caused by the obstruction of seven out of eight Combitube perforations.

Smaller tidal volumes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of adult and paediatric self-inflatable bags with three different ventilatory devices

Gastric inflation and subsequent regurgitation of stomach contents is a major hazard of bag-valve-face mask ventilation during the basic life support phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Recent investigations suggested that use of a paediatric self-inflating bag may reduce stomach inflation while ensuring sufficient lung ventilation. The purpose of our study was to examine whether use of a paediatric self-inflating bag in association with laryngeal mask airway, combitube, and bag-valve-face mask may provide adequate lung ventilation, while reducing the risk of gastric inflation in a bench model simulating the initial phase of CPR. Sixteen intensive care unit registered nurses volunteered for our study. Use of a paediatric versus adult self-inflating bag resulted in a significantly (P < 0.01) lower mean (+/- S.D.) tidal lung volume with both the laryngeal mask airway and combitube (laryngeal mask airway 349 +/- 149 ml versus 725 +/- 266 ml, combitube 389 +/- 113 ml versus 1061 +/- 451 ml). Lung tidal volumes were below the European Resuscitation Council recommendation with both self-inflatable bags in the bag-valve-face mask group (paediatric versus adult self-inflatable bag 256 +/- 77 ml versus 334 +/- 125 ml). Esophageal tidal volumes were significantly (P < 0.05) lower using the paediatric self-inflatable bag in the bag-valve-face mask group; almost no gastric inflation occurred with the laryngeal mask airway, and none with the combitube. In conclusion, use of the paediatric self-inflating bag may reduce gastric inflation, but measured lung tidal volumes are below the European Resuscitation Council recommendation when used with either, the laryngeal mask airway, combitube, or bag-valve-face mask.

Use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by nonanaesthetists

We studied the use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in 100 ASA I and II anaesthetised patients. In the first 50 patients (group A), an experienced anaesthetist inserted the airway. The optimum sizes and cuff volumes for manual ventilation in adult males and females were found to be sizes 11 and 10 with up to 60 ml and 50 ml in each cuff, respectively. Manual ventilation was clinically successful in 49/50 (98%) of these patients. Using these recommendations and following a brief tutorial, a group of 50 nonanaesthetic, basic life-support providers attempted to insert a cuffed oropharyngeal airway and manually ventilate the lungs of a subsequent 50 patients (group NA). Clinically adequate tidal volumes were achieved within 45 s in 47/50 (94%) patients in this group. A persistent leak was present in 21/49 (43%) and 24/47 (51%) of the successful insertions in each group, but this did not affect the ability to ventilate the lungs adequately. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway may offer an effective method of providing adequate ventilation during resuscitation by nonanaesthetic hospital staff.