Disposition of diazepam in young and elderly subjects after acute and chronic dosing

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Healthy Elderly Participants

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, safety, and tolerability of the antiseizure medication brivaracetam (BRV) were characterized in 16 healthy elderly participants (8 men/8 women) aged 65-78 years who received a single 200-mg oral dose of BRV on day 1, followed by 200 mg twice daily from day 3 until day 12. BRV and three metabolites were determined in plasma and urine. Adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, general and neurological examinations, and psychometric rating scales were recorded at regular intervals. No clinically relevant changes or abnormalities were detected. The adverse events were similar to those observed in pivotal trials. Rating scales indicated transiently increased sedation and decreased alertness. BRV pharmacokinetics and metabolism were unchanged relative to younger populations. Based on our observations in this healthy elderly population receiving oral BRV 200 mg twice daily (twice the maximum recommended dose), dose reductions are not warranted relative to other, younger populations. Further investigations may be necessary in frail elderly populations aged >80 years.

Problems associated with effective pharmacotherapy of the elderly patients (geriatrics): A review

The worlds older population is growing dramatically. At the same time, ensuring an appropriate high standard of living for the elderly by reducing of morbidity and disability of geriatric patients is one of the main objectives of the modern healthcare system. However, changes associated with body aging necessitate application of novel approaches to the correction of pharmacotherapy and usage of specialized dosage forms. Such medicinal products provide both an appropriate therapeutic effect and facilitate their use. Presented review considers several features of pharmacotherapy of geriatric patients.

Strategies for the treatment of acute benzodiazepine toxicity in a clinical setting: the role of antidotes

INTRODUCTION

Although not a potentially life-threatening poisoning, benzodiazepine (BZD) intoxication may be life-threatening in special situations/populations or those with background diseases.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to evaluate all possible treatment options available in the literature for the management of benzodiazepine poisoning with special attention to antidote administration. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register from 1 January 1980 to 10 November 2021 using keywords 'benzodiazepine,' 'poisoning,' 'toxicity,' 'intoxication,' and 'treatment.'

EXPERT OPINION

Careful patient selection, ideally by a clinical toxicologist, may decrease the complications of flumazenil and add to its efficacy. The cost-to-benefit ratio should be considered in every single patient who is a candidate for flumazenil administration. In case a decision has been made to administer flumazenil, careful consideration of the possible contraindications is essential. We recommend slow administration of low doses of flumazenil (0.1 mg/minute) to avoid complications or withhold the administration with development of first signs of adverse effects. The main treatment of benzodiazepine toxicity is conservative with administration of activated charcoal, monitoring of the vital signs, prevention of aspiration and development of deep vein thrombosis due to prolonged immobilization, and respiratory support.

Slow Accumulation and Elimination of Diazepam and Its Active Metabolite With Extended Treatment in the Elderly

Age-related changes in disposition of diazepam and its principal active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ), during and after extended dosage with diazepam were studied in healthy volunteers. Eight elderly subjects (ages 61-78 years) and 7 young subjects (21-33 years) received 2.5 mg of diazepam twice daily for 15 days. Predose (trough) concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were measured during the 15 days of dosing, and in the postdosage washout period. Kinetic properties were determined by nonlinear regression using a sequential drug-to-metabolite pharmacokinetic model. Steady-state plasma concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were 30% to 35% higher in elderly subjects compared to young volunteers, and steady-state clearances correspondingly lower, though differences did not reach significance. Large and significant differences were found between young and elderly groups in mean half-life of diazepam (31 vs 86 hours; P < .005) and DMDZ (40 vs 80 hours; P < .02). Half-life values from the multiple-dose study were closely correlated with values from previous single-dose studies of diazepam (R² = 0.85) and DMDZ (R² = 0.94) in the same subjects. With extended dosing of diazepam in the elderly, slow accumulation and delayed washout of diazepam and DMDZ is probable. After discontinuation, withdrawal or rebound effects are reduced in likelihood, but delayed recovery from sedative effects is possible due to slow elimination of active compounds. Safe treatment of elderly patients with diazepam is supported by understanding of age-related changes in pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties.

The Effect of Methylphenidate on Reed Scaling in Benzodiazepine Poisoning: A Prospective Trial

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine is one of the most important causes of substance abuse and intoxication throughout the world and Iran.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to determine the role of stimulants in reversing CNS level in acute Benzodiazepine poisoning patients who were hospitalized at referral poison center.

METHOD

This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial study on 32 cases with pure acute Benzodiazepine poisoning from March 2016 to February 2017. Diagnosis of pure acute poisoning was based on history, and laboratory confirmation. We gathered the demographics, clinical data, laboratory data, hospitalization and outcome. Participants were randomized into two groups: Methylphenidate Group (MPH) and Placebo Group (PBO).

RESULTS

The randomized sample consisted of 32 participants who were predominately female (83%). The majority of the PBO group and the MPH group reported improvement in their consciousness with a significant difference between the two groups (p = .005). Paired sample t-test analyses on Reed Scale data revealed an increase in the probability of improvement during the trial for the MPH group compared to the PBO group. Furthermore, the HCo3 (bicarbonate) level has a significant p-value with respect to age groups (p = .02). None of our cases required either the ICU facility or intubation.

CONCLUSION

Our study provided the MPH superiority over PBO in reversing CNS symptoms in loss of consciousness in acute BZD poisoned patients. Thus, this trial provides concrete evidence that improvement in consciousness levels (Reed Scale rated) among those patients receiving MPH was associated with a methylphenidate use.

Diazepam as an oral hypnotic increases nocturnal blood pressure in the elderly

BACKGROUND

No study has evaluated the cardiovascular effects of diazepam in elderly subjects that assume diazepam to induce sleep.

PURPOSE

The present study was carried out in order to evaluate the effects of chronic administration of diazepam as hypnotic drug on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in healthy elderly subjects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Healthy, elderly subjects, aged 65-74 years, were treated with diazepam 5 mg or placebo-both administered once a day in the evening-for 4 weeks in two cross-over periods, each separated by a 2-week placebo period, according to a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. At the end of each study period, clinical as well as 24-h ambulatory BP and HR were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 25 subjects were included in the analysis. At the end of a 4-week diazepam treatment, clinical as well 24-h BP and HR mean values were not significantly affected. Analysis of sub-periods showed that during night-time, systolic BP (SBP) values under diazepam were 7.6% higher than under placebo, with a mean difference of 7.9 mmHg (p < 0.01), diastolic BP (DBP) values were 5.8% higher, with a mean difference of 3.7 mmHg (p < 0.05 vs placebo) and HR values were 6.6% higher with a mean difference of 4.2 b/min (p < 0.05). The HR increase observed with diazepam persisted during the morning hours, whereas during the afternoon and evening hours SBP, DBP and HR values were similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly subjects chronic assumption of diazepam as hypnotic agent produced an increase in BP, in particular SBP, during night-time and of HR during night-time and morning hours. These effects, which probably depend on a diazepam-mediated increase in sympathetic drive and decrease in vagal tone, might be of clinical relevance due to the role of increased BP and HR as independent predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Experimental versus theoretical log D7.4 , pKa and plasma protein binding values for benzodiazepines appearing as new psychoactive substances

The misuse of benzodiazepines as new psychoactive substances is an increasing problem around the world. Basic physicochemical and pharmacokinetic data is required on these substances to interpret and predict their effects upon humans. Experimental log D7.4 , pKa and plasma protein binding values were determined for 11 benzodiazepines that have recently appeared as new psychoactive substances (3-hydroxyphenazepam, 4'-chlorodiazepam, desalkylflurazepam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, meclonazepam, phenazepam, and pyrazolam) and compared with values generated by various software packages (ACD/I-lab, MarvinSketch, ADMET Predictor and PreADMET). ACD/I-LAB returned the most accurate values for log D7.4 and plasma protein binding while ADMET Predictor returned the most accurate values for pKa . Large variations in predictive errors were observed between compounds. Experimental values are currently preferable and desirable as they may aid with the future 'training' of predictive models for these new psychoactive substances.

Effect of Diazepam on 24-Hour Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Healthy Young Volunteers

Aim: To assess the effects of evening chronic administration of diazepam on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in healthy young adults. Methods: This randomized double blind, cross-over study evaluated the effects of diazepam 5 mg or placebo, both ingested in the evening, on 24-h ambulatory BP and HR in healthy subjects aged 21–30. Results: A total of 30 subjects were included in the analysis. At the end of 4-week diazepam intake, an increase in 24-h HR mean values was found (+5.2 beats/min, p < 0.05). Analysis of subperiods showed that diazepam produced a 10.1% increase in night-time HR (+6.1 beats/min, p < 0.01) without affecting BP. A significant HR rise (+4.9 beats/min, p < 0.05) and SBP reduction (–3.8 mm Hg, p < 0.05) were observed in the morning hours. The HR increase persisted in day-time hours (+4.6 beats/min, p < 0.05), while BP values resulted unaffected. Conclusions: In healthy subjects, diazepam taken as a hypnotic agent induces a significant HR increase, possibly mediated by a decrease in vagal tone. This effect might be of clinical relevance due to the role that HR plays as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.

Drug interaction between idelalisib and diazepam resulting in altered mental status and respiratory failure

In recent years, several new oral anticancer drugs have been approved, many via an accelerated approval process. These new agents have the potential for drug interactions, but lack of familiarity with these drugs by clinicians may increase the risk for drug interactions. We describe an interaction between the new anticancer agent idelalisib (CYP 3A4 inhibitor) and diazepam (CYP 3A4 substrate) that resulted in altered mental status and type II respiratory failure resulting in hospitalization. After discontinuation of both agents, the patient recovered quickly. Idelalisib was reinitiated after discharge. Lorazepam was substituted for diazepam since it is not metabolized via CYP 3A4. Both agents were tolerated well thereafter. This interaction was only flagged by two of four commonly used drug interaction databases. Clinicians should exercise caution with initiating new oral anticancer agents and consider the potential for drug interactions without solely relying on drug interaction databases.

Host factors affecting antiepileptic drug delivery-pharmacokinetic variability

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay in the treatment of epilepsy, one of the most common serious chronic neurological disorders. AEDs display extensive pharmacological variability between and within patients, and a major determinant of differences in response to treatment is pharmacokinetic variability. Host factors affecting AED delivery may be defined as the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine the AED delivery to the site of action, the epileptic focus. Individual differences may occur in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. These differences can be determined by genetic factors including gender and ethnicity, but the pharmacokinetics of AEDs can also be affected by age, specific physiological states in life, such as pregnancy, or pathological conditions including hepatic and renal insufficiency. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs are another important source of variability in response to AEDs. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of the presently available AEDs are discussed in this review as well as their clinical implications.

Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology

GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). The type A GABA receptor (GABA(A)R) system is the primary pharmacological target for many drugs used in clinical anesthesia. The α1, β2, and γ2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs located in the various parts of CNS are thought to be involved in versatile effects caused by inhaled anesthetics and classic benzodiazepines (BZD), both of which are widely used in clinical anesthesiology. During the past decade, the emergence of tonic inhibitory conductance in extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs has coincided with evidence showing that these receptors are highly sensitive to the sedatives and hypnotics used in anesthesia. Anesthetic enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition seems to be preferentially increased in regions shown to be important in controlling memory, awareness, and sleep. This review focuses on the physiology of the GABA(A)Rs and the pharmacological properties of clinically used BZDs. Although classic BZDs are widely used in anesthesiological practice, there is a constant need for new drugs with more favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and fewer side effects. New hypnotics are currently developed, and promising results for one of these, the GABA(A)R agonist remimazolam, have recently been published.

Maintenance time of sedative effects after an intravenous infusion of diazepam: A guide for endoscopy using diazepam

AIM: To examine whether the sedative effects assessed by psychomotor tests would depend on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes after an infusion regimen of diazepam commonly used for gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan.

METHODS: Fifteen healthy Japanese volunteers consisting of three different CYP2C19 genotype groups underwent a critical flicker fusion test, an eye movement analysis and a postural sway test as a test for physical sedative effects, and a visual analog scale (VAS) symptom assessment method as a test for mental sedative effects during the 336 h period after the intravenous infusion of diazepam (5 mg).

RESULTS: The physical sedative effects assessed by the critical flicker test continued for 1 h (t values of 5 min, 30 min and 60 min later: 4.35, 5.00 and 3.19, respectively) and those by the moving radial area of a postural sway test continued for 3 h (t values of 5 h, 30 h, 60 min and 3 h later: -4.05, -3.42, -2.17 and -2.58, respectively), which changed significantly compared with the baseline level before infusion (P < 0.05). On the other hand, the mental sedative effects by the VAS method improved within 1 h. The CYP2C19 genotype-dependent differences in the postinfusion sedative effects were not observed in any of the four psychomotor function tests.

CONCLUSION: With the psychomotor tests, the objective sedative effects of diazepam continued for 1 h to 3 h irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype status and the subjective sedative symptoms improved within 1 h. Up to 3 h of clinical care appears to be required after the infusion of diazepam, although patients feel subjectively improved.

Voriconazole and fluconazole increase the exposure to oral diazepam

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diazepam.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers took 5 mg of oral diazepam in a randomised order on three study sessions: without pretreatment, after oral voriconazole 400 mg twice daily on the first day and 200 mg twice daily on the second day, or after oral fluconazole 400 mg on the first day and 200 mg on the second day. Plasma concentrations of diazepam and N-desmethyldiazepam were determined for up to 48 h. Pharmacodynamic variables were measured for 12 h.

RESULTS

In the voriconazole phase, the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC 0-infinity) of diazepam was increased (geometric mean ratio) 2.2-fold (p < 0.05; 90% confidence interval [CI] 1.56 to 2.82). This was associated with the prolongation of the mean elimination half-life (t(1/2)) from 31 h to 61 h (p < 0.01) after voriconazole. In the fluconazole phase, the AUC 0-infinity of diazepam was increased 2.5-fold (p < 0.01; 90% CI 1.94 to 3.40), and the t(1/2) was prolonged from 31 h to 73 h (p < 0.001). The peak plasma concentration of diazepam was practically unchanged by voriconazole and fluconazole. The pharmacodynamics of diazepam were changed only modestly.

CONCLUSION

Both voriconazole and fluconazole considerably increase the exposure to diazepam. Recurrent administration of diazepam increases the risk of clinically significant interactions during voriconazole or fluconazole treatment, because the elimination of diazepam is impaired significantly.

General versus spinal anesthesia with different forms of sedation in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results of a prospective, randomized study

AIM

To assess the impact of spinal anesthesia (SpA) combined with three different forms of conscious sedation on intraoperative and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for organ confined prostate cancer (pCa).

METHODS

A total of 121 consecutive patients with pCa undergoing RRP were randomized into four groups. They were randomized as follows: group 1 (general anesthesia: 34 patients), group 2 (lumbar 2 to lumbar 3 interspace SpA with diazepam as sedative agent: 28), group 3 (SpA with propofol: 30), and group 4 (SpA with midazolam: 29). Intraoperative and perioperative parameters were collected.

RESULTS

The present study showed that muscle relaxation throughout RRP was not different in the four groups; bleeding was significantly (P = 0.04) lower with SpA, regardless of the form of sedation. Group 3 patients reported the best postoperative oxygen saturation percentage by pulse oximetry and sedation score (P = 0.02; d.f. = 3 and P < 0.0001; d.f. = 3, respectively), the shortest waiting time in the postoperative holding area (P < 0.001; d.f. = 3), the lowest pain on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.0004; d.f. = 3), and the highest frequency of first flatus passage (P = 0.0001; d.f. = 3). A higher number of group 4 patients were able to carry out unassisted ambulation (P < 0.0001; d.f. = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Conscious sedation coupled with SpA is a safe, reliable and effective procedure for patients undergoing RRP. The use of propofol as sedative agent offers several advantages both over other types of conscious sedation and general anesthesia.

Impairment state of cognitive performance and the affecting factors in outpatients following gastrointestinal endoscopy after single-dose diazepam

Diazepam is commonly used as premedicant for endoscopic procedures. Wide interindividual differences have been observed in the residual cognitive effects of the drug after gastrointestinal endoscopy. Our aim was to clarify the major factors, including pharmacokinetic factors, contributing to this wide variation in residual cognitive effect after gastrointestinal endoscopy in the study. Sixty-one outpatients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy participated in the study. Cognitive effects were evaluated in the diazepam group (n=52) by the digit symbol substitution test (DSST) twice before and 30 min after an intravenous administration of 5 mg diazepam; in the intervening time gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed. Plasma concentrations of diazepam were determined by HPLC. The control group (n=9) was tested by DSST in the same manner. The cognitive effects according to the change in DSST score was significantly decline in the diazepam group compared with the control group (by 0.2 versus -4.6; P=0.014). This prospective study confirmed that cognition was significantly impaired after gastrointestinal endoscopy by premedication to subjects with 5 mg diazepam. There were very wide variations in change in DSST score. However we could not identify the independent variables that best predicted DSST score difference in a multiple regression analysis for age, plasma albumin level, and plasma diazepam concentration 30 min after intravenous administration. We should pay attention to patients' individual states in cognitive performance following gastrointestinal endoscopy after single-dose diazepam.

The role of diazepam in the treatment of nerve agent poisoning in a civilian population

The main site of action of diazepam, as with other benzodiazepines, is at the GABA(A) receptor, although it has been suggested that some of the potentially beneficial actions of diazepam in nerve agent poisoning are mediated through other means. It is likely that convulsions may have long-term sequelae in the central nervous system, because of damage by anoxia and/or excitotoxicity. Numerous pharmacodynamic studies of the action of diazepam in animals experimentally poisoned with nerve agents have been undertaken. In nearly all of these, diazepam has been studied in combination with other antidotes, such as atropine and/or pyridinium oximes, sometimes in combination with pyridostigmine pretreatment. These studies show that diazepam is an efficacious anticonvulsant in nerve agent poisoning. There is considerable experimental evidence to support the hypothesis that diazepam (and other anticonvulsants) may prevent structural damage to the central nervous system as evidenced by neuropathological changes such as neuronal necrosis at autopsy. In instances of nerve agent poisoning during terrorist use in Japan, diazepam seems to have been an effective anticonvulsant. Consequently, the use of diazepam is an important part of the treatment regimen of nerve agent poisoning, the aim being to prevent convulsions or reduce their duration. Diazepam should be given to patients poisoned with nerve agents whenever convulsions or muscle fasciculation are present. In severe poisoning, diazepam administration should be considered even before these complications occur. Diazepam is also useful as an anxiolytic in those exposed to nerve agents.

Pharmacokinetic dosage guidelines for elderly subjects

Ageing is associated with a decline in drug elimination; hence, using the same doses as in younger adults may result in higher plasma drug concentrations and toxicity. Two approaches are available for dose correction to account for decreased drug elimination. One procedure is based on the extrarenal elimination fraction (Q(0)) and the age-dependent changes in creatinine clearance; the other uses the decline in total drug clearance (CL). Mean values of Q(0) and CL in young and old people are reported for many drugs in the literature and are summarised in this article. Although the pharmacokinetic techniques for dose adjustment in the elderly are useful, they provide only an average dose correction and neglect age-dependent changes in drug bio-availability, plasma protein binding, the fate of active metabolites, and altered sensitivity to drugs. To account for pharmacodynamic changes in old age, clinical and/or biochemical targets should be defined as therapeutic goals. Drugs whose effects cannot be monitored in these terms should be avoided in elderly individuals.

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of sedatives and analgesics

The agents used for sedation and analgesia during endoscopy have complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Knowledge of these characteristics is necessary for determining the proper agent and dose for specific patient needs. Short-acting agents, such as fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol, provide rapid sedation with a short duration of action that allows patients to return to normal functioning rapidly. When designing a dosing regimen with these agents, age and organ (liver, kidney) function of patients and concomitant medications that may interfere with metabolic and elimination pathways must be considered.

Long-lasting behavioral changes induced by pre- or neonatal exposure to diazepam in rats

Prenatal treatment with small doses of diazepam may counteract the effect of physical stress in rats, normalizing the time course of neonatal reflexes and the behavioral responses in adulthood. However, prenatal administration of diazepam in greater doses may induce desensitization of gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptors and induce hypersensitivity to convulsants. This study was designed to examine in rats the influence of prenatal or neonatal diazepam treatment on development of neonatal reflexes, as index of brain maturation, and susceptibility to pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in adulthood. Pregnant Wistar rats were injected with diazepam 2.5 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneally (i.p.) on days 14-21 of pregnancy. Offspring showed a delay in the appearing of neonatal reflexes (cliff aversion, forelimb placing, forelimb grasping and bar holding) except for righting and startle reflexes. At 50 days of age, male rats showed a greater sensitivity to pentylenetetrazol compared to controls. In contrast, females showed a decreased susceptibility to convulsions. The appearance of reflexes in pups exposed to diazepam during neonatal life appeared to be similar to that of controls. Only the appearance of cliff aversion and startle reflexes appeared to be delayed in animals exposed neonatally to diazepam as compared to controls. In adulthood, female rats exposed in early neonatal life to diazepam again showed a resistance to pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions as compared to male animals. These data suggest that prenatal exposure to diazepam induces long-lasting behavioral changes, which may be influenced by sex-dependent factors.

Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic investigation of medications associated with adverse sedation events in pediatric patients using critical incident analysis of case reports.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen case reports from the adverse drug reporting system of the Food and Drug Administration, the US Pharmacopoeia, and the results of a survey of pediatric specialists were used. Outcome measures were death, permanent neurologic injury, prolonged hospitalization without injury, and no harm. The overall results of the critical incident analysis are reported elsewhere. The current investigation specifically examined the relationship between outcome and medications: individual and classes of drugs, routes of administration, drug combinations and interactions, medication errors and overdoses, patterns of drug use, practitioners, and venues of sedation.

RESULTS

Ninety-five incidents fulfilled study criteria and all 4 reviewers agreed on causation; 60 resulted in death or permanent neurologic injury. Review of adverse sedation events indicated that there was no relationship between outcome and drug class (opioids; benzodiazepines; barbiturates; sedatives; antihistamines; and local, intravenous, or inhalation anesthetics) or route of administration (oral, rectal, nasal, intramuscular, intravenous, local infiltration, and inhalation). Negative outcomes (death and permanent neurologic injury) were often associated with drug overdose (n = 28). Some drug overdoses were attributable to prescription/transcription errors, although none of 39 overdoses in 34 patients seemed to be a decimal point error. Negative outcomes were also associated with drug combinations and interactions. The use of 3 or more sedating medications compared with 1 or 2 medications was strongly associated with adverse outcomes (18/20 vs 7/70). Nitrous oxide in combination with any other class of sedating medication was frequently associated with adverse outcomes (9/10). Dental specialists had the greatest frequency of negative outcomes associated with the use of 3 or more sedating medications. Adverse events occurred despite drugs being administered within acceptable dosing limits. Negative outcomes were also associated with drugs administered by nonmedically trained personnel and drugs administered at home. Some injuries occurred on the way to a facility after administration of sedatives at home; some took place in automobiles or at home after discharge from medical supervision. Deaths and injuries after discharge from medical supervision were associated with the use of medications with long half-lives (chloral hydrate, pentobarbital, promazine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse sedation events were frequently associated with drug overdoses and drug interactions, particularly when 3 or more drugs were used. Adverse outcome was associated with all routes of drug administration and all classes of medication, even those (such as chloral hydrate) thought to have minimal effect on respiration. Patients receiving medications with long plasma half-lives may benefit from a prolonged period of postsedation observation. Adverse events occurred when sedative medications were administered outside the safety net of medical supervision. Uniform monitoring and training standards should be instituted regardless of the subspecialty or venue of practice. Standards of care, scope of practice, resource management, and reimbursement for sedation should be based on the depth of sedation achieved (ie, the degree of vigilance and resuscitation skills required) rather than on the drug class, route of drug administration, practitioner, or venue.

Drug dosage in the elderly. Is it rational?

Pharmacotherapy in the elderly requires an understanding of the age-dependent changes in function and composition of the body. Aging is characterised by a progressive loss of functional capacities of most if not all organs, a reduction in response to receptor stimulation and homeostatic mechanisms, and a loss of water content and an increase of fat content in the body. The most important pharmacokinetic change in old age is a decrease in the excretory capacity of the kidney; in this regard, the elderly should be considered as renally insufficient patients. The decline in the rate of drug metabolism with advancing age is less marked. In addition, the volume of distribution and the oral bioavailability of drugs may be changed in the elderly compared with younger individuals. Average dosage adjustments for the aged can be derived from simple equations and mean pharmacokinetic parameters from older and younger adults. However, these average dose adjustment factors neglect the large variation in the decline in organ functions among the elderly. Individual dose adjustment factors can be obtained from the drug clearance in a particular patient, where clearance/fractional bioavailability (CL/f) may be calculated from the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the drug in question. Using pharmacokinetic guidelines for dose adjustments, the same plasma drug concentrations result in elderly as in younger adults. However, we are frequently confronted with pharmacodynamic changes in old age which alter the sensitivity to drugs, irrespective of changes in drug disposition. For instance, the sensitivity of the cardiovascular system to beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists decreases in old age and the incidence of orthostatic episodes in response to drugs that lower blood pressure is increased. The CNS is especially vulnerable in the elderly; agents that affect brain function (anaesthetics, opioids, anticonvulsants, psychotropic drugs) must be used very cautiously in this age group. The increased responsiveness to drugs in the elderly renders the measurement of drug plasma concentrations an attractive method to monitor pharmacotherapy in this age group. Sensitive technology to quantitatively determine plasma drug concentrations is available. However, optimal therapeutic plasma concentrations have not been established for most drugs in the elderly. Investigations concerning drug pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in the aged are an important area of future work in clinical pharmacology.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.