Inhibition of cytochrome P450 by nefazodone in vitro: studies of dextromethorphan O- and N-demethylation

Effect of human pharmaceuticals common to aquatic environments on hepatic CYP1A and CYP3A-like activities in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): An in vitro study

This study examined the ability of several human pharmaceuticals to modulate hepatic piscine CYP-mediated monooxygenase activities. Effects of six pharmaceuticals: diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, tramadol, carbamazepine, venlafaxine and nefazodone, were investigated in vitro in rainbow trout hepatic microsomes. The reactions of 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and benzyloxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-O-debenzyloxylase (BFCOD), were used as markers for hepatic CYP1A and CYP3A-like activities, respectively. Our results showed that EROD and BFCOD activities were both affected by nefazodone. Nefazodone inhibited EROD in a dose dependent manner and was found to be a potent non-competitive inhibitor of EROD with a K_i value of 6.6 μM. BFCOD activity was inhibited non-competitively in the presence of nefazadone with K_i value of 30.7 μM. BFCOD activity was slightly reduced only by the highest concentration of carbamazepine. Diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, tramadol, and venlafaxine did not affect the activity of either EROD or BFCOD. We further exposed microsomal fraction to mixtures of six pharmaceuticals to investigate potential inhibition. The results showed that EROD and BFCOD activity was inhibited on 94% and 80%, respectively at higher tested concentration. To our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate an inhibitory effect of nefazodone on hepatic CYP1A and CYP3A-like proteins in rainbow trout.

Clinically significant psychotropic drug-drug interactions in the primary care setting

In recent years, the growing numbers of patients seeking care for a wide range of psychiatric illnesses in the primary care setting has resulted in an increase in the number of psychotropic medications prescribed. Along with the increased utilization of psychotropic medications, considerable variability is noted in the prescribing patterns of primary care providers and psychiatrists. Because psychiatric patients also suffer from a number of additional medical comorbidities, the increased utilization of psychotropic medications presents an elevated risk of clinically significant drug interactions in these patients. While life-threatening drug interactions are rare, clinically significant drug interactions impacting drug response or appearance of serious adverse drug reactions have been documented and can impact long-term outcomes. Additionally, the impact of genetic variability on the psychotropic drug's pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics may further complicate drug therapy. Increased awareness of clinically relevant psychotropic drug interactions can aid clinicians to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes in patients in the primary care setting.

Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with second-generation antidepressants: an update

BACKGROUND

The second-generation antidepressants include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and other compounds with different mechanisms of action. All second-generation antidepressants are metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Concomitant intake of inhibitors or inducers of the CYP isozymes involved in the biotransformation of specific antidepressants may alter plasma concentrations of these agents, although this effect is unlikely to be associated with clinically relevant interactions. Rather, concern about drug interactions with second-generation antidepressants is based on their in vitro potential to inhibit > or = 1 CYP isozyme.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article was to review the current literature on clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with second-generation antidepressants.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted for original research and review articles published in English between January 1985 and February 2008. Among the search terms were drug interactions, second-generation antidepressants, newer antidepressants, SSRIs, SNRIs, fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, reboxetine, bupropion, nefazodone, pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, and cytochrome P450. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included, and meeting abstracts were excluded. The reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional publications.

RESULTS

Second-generation antidepressants differ in their potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Fluoxetine and paroxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, fluvoxamine markedly inhibits CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, and nefazodone is a substantial inhibitor of CYP3A4. Therefore, clinically relevant interactions may be expected when these antidepressants are coadministered with substrates of the pertinent isozymes, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic index. Duloxetine and bupropion are moderate inhibitors of CYP2D6, and sertraline may cause significant inhibition of this isoform, but only at high doses. Citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and reboxetine are weak or negligible inhibitors of CYP isozymes in vitro and are less likely than other second-generation antidepressants to interact with co-administered medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-generation antidepressants are not equivalent in their potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Although interactions may be predictable in specific circumstances, use of an antidepressant with a more favorable drug-interaction profile may be justified.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

Antidepressant-drug interactions are potentially but rarely clinically significant

The salient pharmacologic features of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) discovered in the late 1980s included an in vitro ability to inhibit various cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs). Differences in potency among the SSRIs for CYP inhibition formed the basis of a marketing focus based largely on predictions of in vivo pharmacokinetic drug interactions from in vitro data, conclusions derived from case reports, and the extrapolation of the results of pharmacokinetic studies conducted in healthy volunteers to patients. Subsequently introduced antidepressants have undergone a similar post hoc scrutiny for potential drug-drug interactions. Concern for the untoward consequences of drug interactions led the FDA to publish guidance for the pharmaceutical industry in 1997 recommending that in vitro metabolic studies be conducted early in the drug development process to evaluate inhibitory properties toward the major CYPs. However, the prevalence of clinically significant enzyme inhibition interactions occurring during antidepressant treatment remains poorly defined despite millions of exposures. Although lack of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence, sparse epidemiological and post-marketing surveillance data do not substantiate a conclusion that widespread morbidity results from antidepressant-induced drug interactions. This commentary discusses points of uncertainty and controversy in the field of drug interactions, notes areas where inadequate data exist, and suggests explanations for a low prevalence of serious interactions. The conclusion is drawn that drug interactions from CYP inhibition caused by the newer antidepressants are potentially, but rarely, clinically significant.

The influence of long-term treatment with psychotropic drugs on cytochrome P450: the involvement of different mechanisms

This paper emphasises that besides the direct action of psychotropic drugs on cytochrome P450 (CYP) (i.e., the binding of the parent drug to the enzyme) indirect mechanisms of CYP-psychotropic interactions, namely the formation of CYP-reactive metabolite complexes and their influence on enzyme regulation, are also very important. The described interactions that are time-, drug- and CYP isoform-dependent may overlap during long-term treatment. The final result of the overlapping depends on the dosage and time interval after the last administration of a drug, which determines the concentration of the parent drug and its metabolites in the environment of the enzyme. These interactions may occur not only in the liver, but also in the brain, and may change the activity of CYP towards the metabolism of drugs, sex steroids, neurosteroids and amine neurotransmitters. The role of the CNS in the regulation of CYP by psychotropics and the significance of CYP-psychotropic interactions for pharmacological and clinical profiling of these drugs is discussed. In addition, different experimental approaches for studying CNS-acting drugs are compared.

A preliminary open study of the tolerability and effectiveness of nefazodone in major depressive disorder: comparing patients who recently discontinued an SSRI with those on no recent antidepressant treatment

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the recent discontinuation of an SSRI may confound the tolerability of the initiation of nefazodone treatment. We sought to determine whether recent discontinuation of an SSRI interferes with effectiveness and/or tolerability of nefazodone. Twenty-six depressed subjects, 21-63 years old, were recruited at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Thirteen subjects (50%) had discontinued an SSRI within 1-4 weeks due to ineffectiveness and/or side effects. Thirteen subjects (50%) had not taken antidepressants for the previous 6 months. Subjects were administered open nefazodone 50 mg p.o. b.i.d., and doses were increased as tolerated to a maximum of 600 mg/day. Subjects were followed for 12 weeks and were assessed for response and side effects using HAM-D-6 and clinical interviews. Both groups improved significantly on nefazodone; however, there was no statistically significant difference in response (>or=50% decrease in HAM-D-6) rates between completers with prior SSRI treatment (80%) and completers without recent exposure to antidepressants (67%). Response rates based on intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis were 31% for both groups. Association between prior SSRI treatment and discontinuation of nefazodone due to side effects or non-response was not statistically significant. Our study suggests that the rate of negative outcomes with nefazodone is no different whether patients have recently failed an SSRI.

Metabolic drug interactions with new psychotropic agents

New psychotropic drugs introduced in clinical practice in recent years include new antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and 'third generation' antidepressants, and atypical antipsychotics, i.e. clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and amisulpride. These agents are extensively metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and are therefore susceptible to metabolically based drug interactions with other psychotropic medications or with compounds used for the treatment of concomitant somatic illnesses. New antidepressants differ in their potential for metabolic drug interactions. Fluoxetine and paroxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, fluvoxamine markedly inhibits CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, while nefazodone is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. These antidepressants may be involved in clinically significant interactions when coadministered with substrates of these isoforms, especially those with a narrow therapeutic index. Other new antidepressants including sertraline, citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and reboxetine are weak in vitro inhibitors of the different CYP isoforms and appear to have less propensity for important metabolic interactions. The new atypical antipsychotics do not affect significantly the activity of CYP isoenzymes and are not expected to impair the elimination of other medications. Conversely, coadministration of inhibitors or inducers of the CYP isoenzymes involved in metabolism of the various antipsychotic compounds may alter their plasma concentrations, possibly leading to clinically significant effects. The potential for metabolically based drug interactions of any new psychotropic agent may be anticipated on the basis of knowledge about the CYP enzymes responsible for its metabolism and about its effect on the activity of these enzymes. This information is essential for rational prescribing and may guide selection of an appropriate compound which is less likely to interact with already taken medication(s).

Inhibition and possible induction of rat CYP2D after short- and long-term treatment with antidepressants

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: fluoxetine, sertraline) and novel antidepressant drugs (mirtazapine, nefazodone) on the activity of CYP2D, measured as a rate of ethylmorphine O-deethylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of the antidepressants, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally for one day or two weeks (twice a day) with pharmacological doses of the drugs (imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, nefazodone 10 mg kg(-1) i.p.; desipramine, fluoxetine, sertraline 5 mg kg(-1) i.p.; mirtazapine 3 mg kg(-1) i.p.), in the absence of the antidepressants in-vitro. Antidepressants decreased the activity of the rat CYP2D by competitive inhibition of the enzyme, the potency of their inhibitory effect being as follows: clomipramine (K(i) = 14 microM) > sertraline approximate, equals fluoxetine (K(i) = 17 and 16 microM, respectively) > imipramine approximate, equals amitriptyline (K(i) = 26 and 25 microM, respectively) > desipramine (K(i) = 44 microM) > nefazodone (K(i) = 55 microM) > mirtazapine (K(i) = 107 microM). A one-day treatment with antidepressants caused a significant decrease in the CYP2D activity after imipramine, fluoxetine and sertraline. After prolonged administration of antidepressants, the decreased CYP2D activity produced by imipramine, fluoxetine and sertraline was still maintained. Moreover, amitriptyline and nefazodone significantly decreased, while mirtazapine increased the activity of the enzyme. Desipramine and clomipramine did not produce any effect when administered in-vivo. The obtained results indicate three different mechanisms of the antidepressants-CYP2D interaction: firstly, competitive inhibition of CYP2D shown in-vitro, the inhibitory effects of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs being stronger than those of novel drugs; secondly, in-vivo inhibition of CYP2D produced by both one-day and chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (except for desipramine and clomipramine) and SSRIs, which suggests inactivation of the enzyme apoprotein by reactive metabolites; and thirdly, in-vivo inhibition by nefazodone and induction by mirtazapine of CYP2D produced only by chronic treatment with the drugs, which suggests their influence on the enzyme regulation.

Inhibitory effects of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) on human cytochrome P450 enzymes in vitro: mechanism of drug interaction between TCAs and phenytoin

The ability of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) to inhibit phenytoin p-hydroxylation was evaluated in vitro by incubation studies of human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed cytochrome p450s (p450s). The TCAs tested were amitriptyline, imipramine, nortriptyline, and desipramine. Amitriptyline and imipramine strongly and competitively inhibited phenytoin p-hydroxylation in microsomal incubations (estimated K(i) values of 5.2 and 15.5 micro M, respectively). In contrast, nortriptyline and desipramine produced only weak inhibition. In the incubation study using cDNA-expressed P450s, both CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 catalyzed phenytoin p-hydroxylation, whereas TCAs inhibited only the CYP2C19 pathway. All of the TCAs tested inhibited CYP2D6-catalyzed dextromethorphan-O-demethylation competitively, with estimated K(i) values of 31.0, 28.6, 7.9, and 12.5 micro M, respectively. The tertiary amine TCAs, amitriptyline and imipramine, also inhibited CYP2C19-catalyzed S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation (estimated K(i) of 37.7 and 56.8 micro M, respectively). The secondary amine TCAs, nortriptyline and desipramine, however, showed minimal inhibition of CYP2C19 (estimated IC(50) of 600 and 685 micro M, respectively). None of the TCAs tested produced remarkable inhibition of any other p450 isoforms. These results suggest that TCAs inhibit both CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 and that the interaction between TCAs and phenytoin involves inhibition of CYP2C19-catalyzed phenytoin p-hydroxylation.

Summary of information on human CYP enzymes: human P450 metabolism data

This chapter is an update of the data on substrates, reactions, inducers, and inhibitors of human CYP enzymes published previously by Rendic and DiCarlo (1), now covering selection of the literature through 2001 in the reference section. The data are presented in a tabular form (Table 1) to provide a framework for predicting and interpreting the new P450 metabolic data. The data are formatted in an Excel format as most suitable for off-line searching and management of the Web-database. The data are presented as stated by the author(s) and in the case when several references are cited the data are presented according to the latest published information. The searchable database is available either as an Excel file (for information contact the author), or as a Web-searchable database (Human P450 Metabolism Database, www.gentest.com) enabling the readers easy and quick approach to the latest updates on human CYP metabolic reactions.

Possible interaction of zopiclone and nefazodone

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case in which concurrent treatment with nefazodone was associated with an elevation in the plasma concentration of zopiclone, possibly resulting in enhanced hypnosedative efficacy.

CASE REPORT

An 86-year-old white woman was treated with nefazodone for depression. Zopiclone was also introduced for the management of insomnia, but she subsequently experienced morning drowsiness. The concentration of zopiclone in plasma was subsequently measured eight hours after administration on two occasions, during nefazodone therapy and after its withdrawal. After discontnuation of nefazodone, the plasma concentration of the S-enantiomer of zopiclone decreased from 107 to 16.9 ng/mL, while the R-enantiomer plasma concentration decreased from 20.6 to 1.45 ng/mL.

DISCUSSION

Nefazodone is a relatively potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, a hepatic isoenzyme thought to play a major role in the metabolic elimination of zopiclone. The substantial decrease in the plasma zopiclone concentrations observed after withdrawal of nefazodone likely reflects a drug interaction. Despite the normally short elimination half-life of zopiclone, the residual sedation initially observed in this case suggests that the interaction may have clinical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The features observed in this case suggest the possibility of a drug-drug interaction between nefazodone and zopiclone. Further prospective investigation is required to elucidate the nature and magnitude of this effect.

CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to provide distinct dose recommendations for antidepressants based on the genotypes of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. This approach may be a useful complementation to clinical monitoring and therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHOD

Our literature search covered 32 antidepressants marketed in Europe, Canada, and the United States. We evaluated studies which had compared pharmacokinetic parameters of antidepressants among poor, intermediate, extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers.

RESULTS

For 14 antidepressants, distinct dose recommendations for extensive, intermediate and poor metabolizers of either CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 were given. For the tricyclic antidepressants, dose reductions around 50% were generally recommended for poor metabolizers of substrates of CYP2D6 or CYP2C19, whereas differences were smaller for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

We have provided preliminary average dose suggestions based on the phenotype or genotype. This is a first attempt to apply the new pharmacogenetics to suggest dose-regimens that take the differences in drug metabolic capacity into account.

P-glycoprotein interactions of nefazodone and trazodone in cell culture

This study investigated the effects of nefazodone (NFZ) and trazodone (TZD) on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity and expression in cell culture. NFZ and TZD showed no differential transport between the basolateral to apical and apical to basolateral direction across Caco-2 cell monolayers. Transport in either direction was not affected by verapamil. NFZ was a potent inhibitor (IC50 = 4.7 microM) of rhodamine123 (Rh123) B to A transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers, while TZD had minimal effect. Following 72-hour exposure of LS180V cells to NFZ and TZD (10 microM), a twofold increase in immunoreactive P-gp was observed. Rh123 accumulation into these cells was reduced to 65% and 74% of control by NFZ and TZD (10 microM), respectively. It was concluded that differential rates of transport of NFZ and TZD in Caco-2 cells were not evident. However, NFZ is an inhibitor of P-gp activity at clinically relevant in vivo concentrations and may have the potential to increase bioavailability of coadministered compounds that are substrates for transport. Concentrations of NFZ and TZD achieved in the intestine after chronic oral dosing may induce P-gp expression and reduce absorption of coadministered drugs.

Pharmacology of antidepressants

Presently in the United States, 21 compounds have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as antidepressants. Two additional drugs marketed outside the United States as antidepressants have been approved for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nearly one half of all these compounds became available within the past 12 years, whereas the first antidepressant was available more than 40 years ago. After the clinical aspects of depression are introduced in this article, the pharmacology of the newer generation drugs is reviewed in relationship to the older compounds. The information in this review will help clinicians treat acute depression with pharmacological agents.

Drug interactions with cisapride: clinical implications

Cisapride, a prokinetic agent, has been used for the treatment of a number of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in adults and children. Since 1993, 341 cases of ventricular arrhythmias, including 80 deaths, have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Marketing of the drug has now been discontinued in the US; however, it is still available under a limited-access protocol. Knowledge of the risk factors for cisapride-associated arrhythmias will be essential for its continued use in those patients who meet the eligibility criteria. This review summarises the published literature on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of cisapride with concomitantly administered drugs, providing clinicians with practical recommendations for avoiding these potentially fatal events. Pharmacokinetic interactions with cisapride involve inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the primary mode of elimination of cisapride, thereby increasing plasma concentrations of the drug. The macrolide antibacterials clarithromycin, erythromycin and troleandomycin are inhibitors of CYP3A4 and should not be used in conjunction with cisapride. Azithromycin is an alternative. Similarly, azole antifungal agents such as fluconazole, itraconazole and ketoconazole are CYP3A4 inhibitors and their concomitant use with cisapride should be avoided. Of the antidepressants nefazodone and fluvoxamine should be avoided with cisapride. Data with fluoxetine is controversial, we favour the avoidance of its use. Citalopram, paroxetine and sertraline are alternatives. The HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir inhibit CYP3A4. Clinical experience with cisapride is lacking but avoidance with all protease inhibitors is recommended, although saquinavir is thought to have clinically insignificant effects on CYP3A4. Delavirdine is also a CYP3A4 inhibitor and should be avoided with cisapride. We also recommend avoiding coadministration of cisapride with amiodarone, cimetidine (alternatives are famotidine, nizatidine, ranitidine or one of the proton pump inhibitors), diltiazem and verapamil (the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are alternatives), grapefruit juice, isoniazid, metronidazole, quinine, quinupristin/dalfopristin and zileuton (montelukast is an alternative). Pharmacodynamic interactions with cisapride involve drugs that have the potential to have additive effects on the QT interval. We do not recommend use of cisapride with class Ia and III antiarrhythmic drugs or with adenosine, bepridil, cyclobenzaprine, droperidol, haloperidol, nifedipine (immediate release), phenothiazine antipsychotics, tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants or vasopressin. Vigilance is advised if anthracyclines, cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, pentamidine or probucol are used with cisapride. In addition, uncorrected electrolyte disturbances induced by diuretics may increase the risk of torsade de pointes. Patients receiving cisapride should be promptly treated for electrolyte disturbances.

Carbamazepine-nefazodone interaction in healthy subjects

The pharmacokinetic interaction between nefazodone and carbamazepine was investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received nefazodone 200 mg twice daily for 5 days, and blood sample collection was performed on day 5 for 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis. A 4-day wash-out phase then followed from days 6 to 9. Carbamazepine 200 mg was administered once daily from days 10 to 12, and then 200 mg was given twice daily from days 13 to 44. A 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 38. Nefazodone 200 mg twice daily was added to the dosing regimen from days 40 to 44, and a subsequent 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 44. Coadministration of nefazodone increased steady-state plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of carbamazepine from 60.77 (+/-8.44) to 74.98 (+/-12.88) microg x hr/mL (p < 0.001) and decreased the active carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide metabolite AUC concentration from 7.10 (+/-1.16) to 5.71 (+/-0.52) microg x hr/mL (p < 0.005). During the combination, the steady-state AUC of nefazodone decreased from 7,326 (+/-3,768) to 542 (+/-191) ng x hr/mL, and the AUCs of its metabolites (hydroxynefazodone, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine, and triazoledione) decreased significantly as well (p < 0.001). Coadministration of nefazodone 200 mg twice daily and carbamazepine 200 mg twice daily was found to be safe and well tolerated; however, the increased plasma exposure to carbamazepine may warrant monitoring of plasma carbamazepine concentrations with the combination. However, higher doses (>400 mg/day) of carbamazepine could yield more extensive induction, affecting tolerability of the combination. No change in the initial nefazodone dose is necessary, and subsequent dose adjustments should be made on the basis of clinical effects; however, the repercussion of carbamazepine induction of nefazodone metabolism on the antidepressant efficacy has yet to be studied.

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol: an update

Haloperidol is commonly used in the therapy of patients with acute and chronic schizophrenia. The enzymes involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol include cytochrome P450 (CYP), carbonyl reductase and uridine diphosphoglucose glucuronosyltransferase. The greatest proportion of the intrinsic hepatic clearance of haloperidol is by glucuronidation, followed by the reduction of haloperidol to reduced haloperidol and by CYP-mediated oxidation. In studies of CYP-mediated disposition in vitro, CYP3A4 appears to be the major isoform responsible for the metabolism of haloperidol in humans. The intrinsic clearances of the back-oxidation of reduced haloperidol to the parent compound, oxidative N-dealkylation and pyridinium formation are of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the same enzyme system is responsible for the 3 reactions. Large variation in the catalytic activity was observed in the CYP-mediated reactions, whereas there appeared to be only small variations in the glucuronidation and carbonyl reduction pathways. Haloperidol is a substrate of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor, as well as a stimulator, of CYP2D6. Reduced haloperidol is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and inhibitor of CYP2D6. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur between haloperidol and various drugs given concomitantly, for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, venlafaxine, buspirone, alprazolam, rifampicin (rifampin), quinidine and carteolol. Overall, drug interaction studies have suggested that CYP3A4 is involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol in humans. Interactions of haloperidol with most drugs lead to only small changes in plasma haloperidol concentrations, suggesting that the interactions have little clinical significance. On the other hand, the coadministration of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin or quinidine affects the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol to an extent that alterations in clinical consequences would be expected. In vivo pharmacogenetic studies have indicated that the metabolism and disposition of haloperidol may be regulated by genetically determined polymorphic CYP2D6 activity. However, these findings appear to contradict those from studies in vitro with human liver microsomes and from studies of drug interactions in vivo. Interethnic and pharmacogenetic differences in haloperidol metabolism may explain these observations.

Human cytochromes and some newer antidepressants: kinetics, metabolism, and drug interactions

The appearance of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants in the mid-1980s caused the discipline of clinical psychopharmacology to refocus attention to the topics of drug metabolism and drug interactions. This article reviews the metabolic profiles of some newer antidepressants, the clinical implications of metabolic properties, and research methodology that can be applied in determining which specific human cytochromes P450 (CYP) mediate metabolic pathways. Also reviewed are the relative activities of various new antidepressants as inhibitors of CYPs, and the benefits and drawbacks of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for identification and quantitation of drug interactions.

Nefazodone and cyclosporine drug-drug interaction

Depression is a significant post-transplant complication often necessitating drug therapy. Many of the newer selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants are metabolized by the same cytochrome P450IIIA isoenzyme system that is responsible for the metabolism of cyclosporine, and these agents pose an interactive risk in transplant patients. We have observed nearly a 10-fold increase in whole blood cyclosporine concentrations in a cardiac transplant patient shortly after the addition of nefazodone antidepressant therapy. We suggest there is a clinically significant drug-drug interaction between nefazodone and cyclosporine due to inhibition of cytochrome P-450 IIIA4 isoenzymes by nefazodone.

Extrapolating in vitro data on drug metabolism to in vivo pharmacokinetics: evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between amitriptyline and fluoxetine

Recently, models have been proposed to extrapolate in vitro data on the influence of inhibitors on drug metabolism to in vivo decrement in drug clearance. Many factors influence drug clearance such as age, gender, habits, diet, environment, liver disease, heredity, and other drugs. In vitro investigation of hepatic cytochrome P450 activity has generally centered on genetic influences and interactions with other drugs. This group of enzymes is involved in many, although not all, drug interactions. The interaction of amitriptyline and fluoxetine is an example. Of the different in vitro paradigms, interaction studies utilizing human liver microsomal preparations have proved to be the most generally applicable for in vitro scaling models. Assuming Michaelis-Menten conditions and applying nonlinear regression, a hybrid inhibition constant (Ki) can be generated that allows classification of the inhibitory potency of an inhibitor toward a specific reaction. This constant is largely independent of the substrate concentration, but in vivo relevance is critically dependent on the inhibitor concentration in the site of metabolic activity, the liver cell cytosol. Many lipophilic drugs are extensively bound to plasma protein but, nonetheless, demonstrate extensive partitioning into liver tissue. This is not compatible with diffusion only of the unbound drug fraction into liver cells. The introduction of a partition factor, based on data from a number of possible sources, provided a reasonable basis for the scaling of in vitro data to in vivo conditions. Many interactions could be reconstructed or predicted with greater accuracy and clinical relevance for interactions such as terfenadine or midazolam and ketoconazole. Even for less marked interactions such as amitriptyline and fluoxetine, this model provides a forecast consistent with the clinically observed range of 22-45% reduction in oral clearance, although this interaction is complicated by the presence of two inhibitors, fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. The concept of in vitro-in vivo scaling is promising and might ultimately yield a fast and more cost-effective screening for drug interactions with reduced human drug exposure and risk.

Multiple human cytochromes contribute to biotransformation of dextromethorphan in-vitro: role of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A

Cytochromes mediating the biotransformation of dextromethorphan to dextrorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan, its principal metabolites in man, have been studied by use of liver microsomes and microsomes containing individual cytochromes expressed by cDNA-transfected human lymphoblastoid cells. In-vitro formation of dextrorphan from dextromethorphan by liver microsomes was mediated principally by a high-affinity enzyme (Km (substrate concentration producing maximum reaction velocity) 3-13 microM). Formation of dextrorphan from 25 microM dextromethorphan was strongly inhibited by quinidine (IC50 (concentration resulting in 50% inhibition) = 0.37 microM); inhibition by sulphaphenazole was approximately 18% and omeprazole and ketoconazole had minimal effect. Dextrorphan was formed from dextromethorphan by microsomes from cDNA-transfected lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP2C9, -2C19, and -2D6 but not by those expressing CYP1A2, -2E1 or -3A4. Despite the low in-vivo abundance of CYP2D6, this cytochrome was identified as the dominant enzyme mediating dextrorphan formation at substrate concentrations below 10 microM. Formation of 3-methoxy-morphinan from dextromethorphan in liver microsomes proceeded with a mean Km of 259 microM. For formation of 3-methoxymorphinan from 25 microM dextromethorphan the IC50 for ketoconazole was 1.15 microM; sulphaphenazole, omeprazole and quinidine had little effect. 3-Methoxymorphinan was formed by microsomes from cDNA-transfected lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP2C9, -2C19, -2D6, and -3A4, but not by those expressing CYP1A2 or -2E1. CYP2C19 had the highest affinity (Km = 49 microM) whereas CYP3A4 had the lowest (Km = 1155 microM). Relative abundances of the four cytochromes were determined in liver microsomes by use of the relative activity factor approach. After adjustment for relative abundance, CYP3A4 was identified as the dominant enzyme mediating 3-methoxymorphinan formation from dextromethorphan, although CYP2C9 and -2C19 were estimated to contribute to 3-methoxymorphinan formation, particularly at low substrate concentrations. Although formation of dextrorphan from dextromethorphan appears to be sufficiently specific to be used as an in-vitro or in-vivo index reaction for profiling of CYP2D6 activity, the findings raise questions about the specificity of 3-methoxymorphinan formation as an index of CYP3A activity.

Metabolism of the newer antidepressants. An overview of the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic implications

Several chemically unrelated agents has been developed and introduced in the past decade, to supplement the earlier antidepressants. These include inhibitors of the reuptake of serotonin [the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)] or noradrenaline (reboxetine) or both (milnacipran and venlafaxine), as well as drugs with distinct neurochemical profiles such as mirtazapine, nefazodone, moclobemide and tianeptine. Like the earlier drugs, these newer antidepressants are almost totally biotransformed before excretion, except for milnacipran whose clearance appears to be due equally to both urinary excretion and metabolism. Sometimes--as in the case of moclobemide--up to 20 metabolites have been identified in body fluids. In some cases, however, only a few metabolites have been detected, and a substantial proportion of the dose remains unaccounted for (e.g. fluoxetine and fluvoxamine). Metabolism generally proceeds through sequential or parallel oxidative pathways. These may be affected to varying degrees by physiological and pathological factors and those mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP2C19 through genetic polymorphism. Some are influenced by chirality (e.g. the dealkylation of citalopram and fluoxetine), although information on this aspect of disposition is still lacking for other drugs existing as racemates (e.g. mirtazapine and tianeptine) and milnacipran, which is probably a mixture of 4 stereoisomers. Others again are saturable within the therapeutic range of doses (e.g. some pathways of metabolism of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, paroxetine and venlafaxine). This may explain the individual variability with all these drugs which, from the pharmacokinetic point of view, is the same as with tricyclic agents. Our knowledge of the isoenzymes involved in the various oxidation pathways and their relevance for potential drug interactions varies from a considerable amount for most of the SSRI and nefazodone, to minimal for reboxetine and tianeptine. This information is useful for predicting the pharmacokinetic interactions mediated through inhibition of specific isoenzymes. This would be better appreciated if the enzymatic mechanisms involved in the biotransformation of the metabolite(s), and their role in drug interactions, were also known. This information is still lacking for some drugs, although metabolites may exhibit in vitro inhibitory potencies of similar to (paroxetine and its M2 metabolite as inhibitors of CYP2D6) or even greater than that of the parent drug (norfluoxetine is more potent than fluoxetine as an inhibitor of CYP3A3/4, and in view of the longer half-life (t1/2) of the metabolite the potential for interactions may persist for weeks after discontinuation of the parent drug). While we do know something about the biological activity of the metabolites of some of these drugs, we know very little about others. With few exceptions this knowledge refers only to the major metabolite(s) and regards the main in vitro effects as exerted by the parent drug. However, in vitro potency and selectivity may not translate directly into in vivo, and either major or minor metabolites may have characteristic in vitro and in vivo properties. For example, unlike the parent drug some minor ring-opened metabolites of moclobemide have monoamine oxidase-B inhibitory activity in the rat, and the nefazodone metabolite m-chlorophenyl-piperazine shows activity on 5-HT2C receptors in rats and humans. Data on the brain-to-blood partition of metabolites compared with their parent drug are available only in a few cases. They are still not known for the main metabolites of fluvoxamine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, moclobemide, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine and venlafaxine, despite the fact that total blood concentrations do not always reflect the metabolite: parent drug ratio in brain. Thus, in most cases, we do not really know what part hepatic metabolism plays in the overall effect of the administered parent drug.

Terfenadine-antidepressant interactions: an in vitro inhibition study using human liver microsomes

AIMS

Inhibition of the metabolism of terfenadine has been associated with torsades de pointes ventricular arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the potency of the antidepressants nefazodone, sertraline and fluoxetine in inhibiting terfenadine biotransformation.

METHODS

Human liver microsomes were incubated with terfenadine and the antidepressants at various concentrations. Formation of the two major metabolites of terfenadine was determined by h.p.l.c.

RESULTS

The apparent Km for microsomes from four human livers was 11+/-5 and 18+/-3 microM (mean +/-s.e.mean) for the N-dealkylation and C-hydroxylation pathways, respectively. Nefazodone, sertraline and fluoxetine inhibited terfenadine N-dealkylation with K(i) values of 10+/-4, 10+/-3 and 68+/-15 microM respectively. Inhibition of the C-hydroxylation pathway yielded noncompetitive K(i) values of 41+/-4, 67+/-13 and 310+/-40 microM respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nefazodone and sertraline were moderately weak in vitro inhibitors of terfenadine metabolism while fluoxetine was a very weak inhibitor. Clinically significant interaction of terfenadine is more likely with nefazodone than sertraline or fluoxetine since therapeutic plasma levels of nefazodone are comparatively higher.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nefazodone

Nefazodone is a new antidepressant drug, chemically unrelated to the tricyclic, tetracyclic or selective serotonin uptake inhibitors. Nefazodone blocks the serotonin 5-HT2 receptors and reversibly inhibits serotonin reuptake in vivo. Nefazodone is completely and rapidly absorbed after oral administration with a peak plasma concentration observed within 2 hours of administration. Nefazodone undergoes significant first-pass metabolism resulting in an oral bioavailability of approximately 20%. Although there is an 18% increase in nefazodone bioavailability with food, this increase is not clinically significant and nefazodone can be administered without regard to meals. Three pharmacologically active nefazodone metabolites have been identified: hydroxy-nefazodone, triazoledione and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP). The pharmacokinetics of nefazodone are nonlinear. The increase in plasma concentrations of nefazodone are greater than would be expected if they were proportional to increases in dose. Steady-state plasma concentrations of nefazodone are attained within 4 days of the commencement of administration. The pharmacokinetics of nefazodone are not appreciably altered in patients with renal or mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment. However, nefazodone plasma concentrations are increased in severe hepatic impairment and in the elderly, especially in elderly females. Lower doses of nefazodone may be necessary in these groups. Nefazodone is a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and does not inhibit CYP1A2. It is not anticipated that nefazodone will interact with drugs cleared by these isozymes. Indeed, nefazodone did not affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, a compound cleared by CYP1A2. Nefazodone is metabolised by and inhibits CYP3A4. Clinically significant interactions have been observed between nefazodone and the benzodiazepines triazolam and alprazolam, cyclosporin and carbamazepine. The potential for a clinically significant interaction between nefazodone and other drugs cleared by CYP3A4 (e.g. terfenadine) should be considered before the coadministration of these compounds. There was an increase in haloperidol plasma concentrations when coadministered with nefazodone; nefazodone pharmacokinetics were not affected after coadministration. No clinically significant interaction was observed when nefazodone was administered with lorazepam, lithium, alcohol, cimetidine, warfarin, theophylline or propranolol.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of new antidepressants: a review of the effects on the metabolism of other drugs

Seven of the newest antidepressants are the serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, and fluvoxamine [currently approved in the United States only for obsessive-compulsive disorder]), a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (venlafaxine), a postsynaptic serotonin antagonist-presynaptic serotonin reuptake inhibitor (nefazodone), and a presynaptic-postsynaptic noradrenergic-serotonergic receptor antagonist (mirtazapine). Many of these drugs are potent inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 enzymes (CYPs) of the liver. The isoforms of the CYPs most relevant to the use of antidepressants are CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. CYP inhibition may affect the metabolism of numerous drugs in several classes that are substrates for these isoenzymes, with potentially serious consequences. To minimize the potential for an adverse event, the practitioner must remember the drug-drug interactions, and possible consequences when one of these antidepressants is being prescribed. A "primer" on drug metabolism is included herein, which serves as a basis for understanding these interactions., Each of the isoenzymes of the CYPs is discussed in relationship to the drugs they metabolize, and appropriate cautions are recommended for concurrent administration of these new antidepressants and other drugs most frequently prescribed to elderly patients.

Use of in vitro and in vivo data to estimate the likelihood of metabolic pharmacokinetic interactions

This article reviews the information available to assist pharmacokineticists in the prediction of metabolic drug interactions. Significant advances in this area have been made in the last decade, permitting the identification in early drug development of dominant cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform(s) metabolising a particular drug as well as the ability of a drug to inhibit a specific CYP isoform. The major isoforms involved in human drug metabolism are CYP3A, CYP2D6, CYP2C, CYP1A2 and CYP2E1. Often patients are taking multiple concurrent medications, and thus an assessment of potential drug-drug interactions is imperative. A database containing information about the clearance routes for over 300 drugs from multiple therapeutic classes, including analgesics, anti-infectives, psychotropics, anticonvulsants, cancer chemotherapeutics, gastrointestinal agents, cardiovascular agents and others, was constructed to assist in the semiquantitative prediction of the magnitude of potential interactions with drugs under development. With knowledge of the in vitro inhibition constant of a drug (Ki) for a particular CYP isoform, it is theoretically possible to assess the likelihood of interactions for a drug cleared through CYP-mediated metabolism. For many agents, the CYP isoform involved in metabolism has not been identified and there is substantial uncertainty given the current knowledge base. The mathematical concepts for prediction based on competitive enzyme inhibition are reviewed in this article. These relationships become more complex if the inhibition is of a mixed competitive/noncompetitive nature. Sources of uncertainty and inaccuracy in predicting the magnitude of in vivo inhibition includes the nature and design of in vitro experiments to determine Ki, inhibitor concentration in the hepatic cytosol compared with that in plasma, prehepatic metabolism, presence of active metabolites and enzyme induction. The accurate prospective prediction of drug interactions requires rigorous attention to the details of the in vitro results, and detailed information about the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the inhibitor and inhibited drug. With the discussion of principles and accompanying tabulation of literature data concerning the clearance of various drugs, a framework for reasonable semiquantitative predictions is offered in this article.