Successful treatment of severe refractory atopic dermatitis with mycophenolate mofetil

Update "Systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis" of the S2k-guideline on atopic dermatitis

This guideline is an update from August 2020 the S2k-guideline "Atopic dermatitis" published in 2015. The reason for updating this chapter of the guideline were the current developments in the field of systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis. The agreed recommendations for systemic treatment in atopic dermatitis of the present guideline are based on current scientific data. Due to the approval of dupilumab for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, which cannot be treated sufficiently with topical drugs alone, this part of the guideline has now been adapted and newly consented. The indication for systemic therapy and the therapeutic response to topical and systemic treatment should be recorded and documented in a suitable form in clinic and practice. A standardized documentation of the indication for system therapy in atopic dermatitis can be recommended and is also part of the updated chapter of this guideline.

Childhood atopic dermatitis: current developments, treatment approaches, and future expectations

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disorder of childhood. Underlying factors that contribute to AD are impaired epithelial barrier, alterations in the lipid composition of the skin, immunological imbalance including increased Th2/Th1 ratio, proinflammatory cytokines, decreased T regulatory cells, genetic mutations, and epigenetic alterations. Atopic dermatitis is a multifactorial disease with a particularly complicated pathophysiology. Discoveries to date may be considered the tip of the iceberg, and the increasing number of studies in this field indicate that there are many points to be elucidated in AD pathophysiology. In this review, we aimed to illustrate the current understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in AD, to evaluate available treatment options with a focus on recently discovered therapeutic agents, and to determine the personal, familial, and economic burdens of the disease, which are frequently neglected issues in AD. Currently available therapies only provide transient solutions and cannot fully cure the disease. However, advances in the understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of the disease have led to the production of new treatment options, while ongoing drug trials also have had promising results.

Mycophenolate mofetil and atopic dermatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: For severe cases of atopic dermatitis, systemic or potent agents may be required for control of disease. There have been some reports of treatment efficacy of off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with refractory atopic dermatitis or have developed adverse effects to initial systemic agents.Methods: Electronic searches were performed using six databases from their inception to April 2019. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints.Results: From 140 cases, the mean age was 38.21 ± 22.8 years. There were 52.9% males and 47.1% females. The average number of failed agents was 3.5 ± 1.2. 77.6% reported partial or full remission. Relapses occurred in 8.2% of cases. The average time for initial effects was 6.8 ± 7 weeks. There was a significant reduction in pre to post SCORAD scores by 18 points (p = .0002). More males had complications compared to females. Prolonged duration of treatment ≥1 year was associated with herpes infections.Conclusions: In summary, the current evidence to date is low-quality in nature but is promising regarding the efficacy and safety of MMF for adult and pediatric atopic dermatitis. There should be ongoing monitoring for infections that may develop on long term therapy.

Systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis

Therapy of severe atopic dermatitis, which is refractory to consistent treatment with topical steroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors is still a problem in many cases. The use of cyclosporine, which is the only approved systemic drug for the therapy of severe atopic dermatitis, is often limited by contraindications or adverse reactions. In this context, results from controlled and open-label studies with novel therapeutic approaches such as methotrexate, omalizumab or rituximab, which are in part very promising, are of great interest. In this work we would like to provide an overview of established and new therapeutic options for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis.

Mycophenolate mofetil and skin diseases

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug the efficiency of which has been established in renal transplantation. Recent studies suggest that it may also be effective in the treatment of variant skin diseases especially if the skin lesions are triggered by lymphocytes. Studies have shown efficacy in autoimmune bullous dermatoses, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. However, there are no placebo-controlled trials that support the use of MMF as first line therapy in these skin diseases.

Mycophenolate mofetil and skin diseases

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug the efficiency of which has been established in renal transplantation. Recent studies suggest that it may also be effective in the treatment of variant skin diseases especially if the skin lesions are triggered by lymphocytes. Studies have shown efficacy in autoimmune bullous dermatoses, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. However, there are no placebo-controlled trials that support the use of MMF as first line therapy in these skin diseases.

Systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis

Systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis (AD) is indicated in patients with severe disease refractory to adequate topical treatment. Currently available drugs aim to decrease inflammation by suppressing and/or modulating immune responses and thus may indirectly improve skin barrier function, resulting in a decrease in clinical signs and symptoms in particular pruritus. Before considering systemic treatment, patient adherence to topical treatment including skin care has to be ensured. The selection of the drug depends on the disease severity, localization, complications, concomitant diseases, and age of the patient, but also on their availability and costs as well as the doctor's experience. Bearing in mind the potential risk of resistance, systemic therapy with antibiotics should be exclusively considered in clinically manifest infections such as in children. Here, we review recently published clinical trials and case reports on systemic therapy of pediatric and adult patients with AD to draw conclusions for clinical practice. Although AD is a common disease, controlled clinical studies investigating the efficacy of systemic drugs are scarce, except for cyclosporine, which has been approved for the therapy of severe AD.

Long term treatment concepts and proactive therapy for atopic eczema

Atopic eczema, also known as atopic dermatitis, is a frequent, highly pruritic, chronic skin disease, which is typically running in flares. The traditional treatment mainly consists of the reactive application of topical anti-inflammatory agents such as topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. The short term benefit of this approach is well known, but long term remission between flares is difficult to achieve. Therefore, innovative long-term treatment strategies targeting flare prevention and skin barrier stabilization are needed. We and others have shown that normal looking, non-lesional skin of atopic dermatitis patients is immunobiologially not normal but characterized by an invisible inflammation and barrier defect. This has led to the novel concept of proactive therapy, which is defined as long-term, low-dose intermittent application of anti-inflammatory therapy to the previously affected skin, together with an ongoing emollient treatment of unaffected skin. This review article describes the most important long-term treatment options for atopic dermatitis, which includes emollient therapy, the novel concept of proactive treatment, the different ultraviolet light modalities and a selection of systemic immunosuppressive drugs and biologics. Current trial data, licensed indications, off-label use and relevant side effects of the different treatment modalities are summarized.

Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in antimalarial-resistant cutaneous lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunomodulatory drug shown to be effective in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Several anecdotal reports have suggested that MMF may be efficacious in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to summarize and report our experience with the use of MMF in patients with CLE recalcitrant to antimalarial therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our open-label observations of 24 patients with CLE refractory to antimalarial therapy. The records of all patients visiting the Rheumatic Skin Disease Clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas from January 1, 2001, to July 1, 2006, were reviewed.

RESULTS

MMF was tolerated well and, in conjunction with other therapies, was highly effective in the treatment of antimalarial-resistant CLE. With the addition of MMF to the existing regimen, a majority of patients achieved full control of disease signs and symptoms. All patients experienced some degree of improvement.

LIMITATIONS

This is an open-label retrospective review. Severity of disease was assessed by qualitative assessment of the clinician. MMF was not used as monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that MMF, used as an additional agent in conjunction with standard therapy, is both well tolerated and efficacious in the treatment of refractory CLE. Despite the obvious limitations of the study, we believe this represents further evidence that MMF should be considered early in the treatment of patients refractory to antimalarial therapy.

Systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis in children

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common disease in childhood that is a serious burden on patients and their families. Most AD is mild and can be managed with the use of emollients and standard therapy consisting of topical corticosteroids or topical calcineurin inhibitors. However, in a subgroup of patients with moderate to severe AD, the disease is recalcitrant to topical therapy and systemic treatments become necessary. Short courses of systemic corticosteroids are often used in clinical practice, but their use is controversial. International guidelines suggest that in the case of acute flare-ups, patients might benefit from a short course of systemic corticosteroids, but long-term use and use in children should be avoided. Ciclosporin is an immunosuppressant agent that acts directly on cells of the immune system, with an inhibitory effect on T cells. When AD cannot be controlled by standard topical therapies, ciclosporin significantly decreases symptom scores, disease extent, pruritus and sleep deprivation, and improves quality of life. The most frequent adverse effects associated with the use of ciclosporin are hypertension and renal dysfunction, but they are usually reversible after drug discontinuation. Ciclosporin has been found to be safely used, effective and well tolerated in children with severe AD. However, studies to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of ciclosporin in AD are lacking. In patients for whom ciclosporin is not suitable, or when there is a lack of response, alternative drugs should be considered, such as azathioprine or interferon-gamma. Intravenous immunoglobulins and the monoclonal antibody infliximab only have a place in the systemic therapy of AD when other drugs have failed. Mycophenolate mofetil has recently been introduced in the treatment of recalcitrant AD. Efalizumab and omalizumab are monoclonal antibodies with a possible future role in the treatment of AD, but further studies are needed.

Systemic therapeutic options for severe atopic dermatitis

Systemic therapy of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is difficult in some cases, because the use of immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine A, mofetil mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and azathioprine is limited by adverse reactions or contraindications. Recent reports suggest a helpful role for biologics, methotrexate, anti-IgE antibodies, and immunotherapy. We review the modes of action, as well as advantages and disadvantages of current and new systemic therapeutic options for severe AD.

Emerging treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronically relapsing eczematous disease of the skin. A wide range of therapeutic regimens has been used for atopic dermatitis. A better understanding of its pathogenesis will also lead to the development of novel approaches to treating this disease. This article reviews the recent advances in allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy and therapy with antileukotriene drugs, probiotics, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide, and intermittent fluticasone propionate ointment, which the authors expect will be clinically useful therapies in the near future.

Cyclosporin A Treatment Is Associated with Increased Serum Immunoglobulin E Levels in a Subgroup of Atopic Dermatitis Patients

Cyclosporin A is increasingly used in the treatment of severe refractory atopic dermatitis. Although cyclosporin A treatment is highly efficacious and relatively safe, we report four adult atopic dermatitis (AD) patients who deteriorated during long-term cyclosporin A treatment, with clinical signs and symptoms more severe than at the onset of treatment. Interestingly, these patients showed large increases of total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, paralleled by increasing disease severity and serum levels of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine. This implies that cyclosporin A may induce a shift to Th2, resulting in increased IgE synthesis, in a subpopulation of AD patients. We therefore suggest that in this subpopulation, treatment with anti-B cell or combined anti-B and T-cell treatment may be favorable.

Mycophenolate mofetil for severe childhood atopic dermatitis: experience in 14 patients

BACKGROUND

Reports of successful treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have thus far been limited to adults. Considering that the condition typically develops during childhood and is most active during this period, MMF would represent a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for paediatric AD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MMF in the treatment of severe childhood AD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all children treated with MMF as systemic monotherapy for severe, recalcitrant AD between August 2003 and August 2006 at New York University Medical Center. Fourteen patients meeting these criteria were identified.

RESULTS

Four patients (29%) achieved complete clearance, four (29%) had > 90% improvement (almost complete), five (35%) had 60-90% improvement and one (7%) failed to respond. Initial responses occurred within 8 weeks (mean 4 weeks), and maximal effects were attained after 8-12 weeks (mean 9 weeks) at MMF doses of 40-50 mg kg(-1) daily in younger children and 30-40 mg kg(-1) daily in adolescents. The medication was well tolerated in all patients, with no infectious complications or development of leucopenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia or elevated aminotransferases.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective case series demonstrates that MMF can be a safe and effective treatment for severe, refractory AD in children. MMF represents a promising therapeutic alternative to traditional systemic immunosuppressive agents with less favourable side-effect profiles, and prospective controlled studies are warranted, further to assess its benefits in paediatric AD.

Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin that can be refractory to topical and systemic corticosteroids, phototherapy, topical immunomodulators and systemic immunosuppressive drugs. Recent studies have shown promise for the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to treat recalcitrant AD.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of MMF used for moderate to severe AD in a university outpatient dermatology clinic.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 20 patient charts was conducted for patient age, gender, duration of disease, prior therapies, concomitant therapy, clinical response and adverse side-effects.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients, 17 improved within 4 weeks of starting MMF therapy. Ten patients had disease remission and were subsequently able to discontinue MMF. Seven attained satisfactory control of their AD using MMF as maintenance therapy. Overall, MMF was well tolerated, with mild headaches, gastrointestinal complaints and fatigue as the commonest side-effects. During therapy, herpes zoster developed in four patients, Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous infections in two, and herpes simplex in one. One patient discontinued MMF because of insufficient control of pruritus.

CONCLUSION

MMF can be rapidly effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe AD resistant to conventional therapies. The limitations of this retrospective study include no control group and a lack of a standardized scoring index to assess improvement, and the concomitant use of adjuvant therapies makes the contribution of MMF alone difficult to assess. Larger controlled studies are needed.

Recent developments in the treatment of adult atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a common inflammatory skin condition with increasing incidence in recent decades. The mainstay of treatment has been the combination of emollients and topical corticosteroids, with the addition of systemic therapies in severe cases. New drugs such as the topical calcineurin inhibitors have shown promise in treating mild-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Other novel therapies that have been reported in the literature include leukotriene antagonists, monoclonal antibodies such as infliximab, leflunomide, recombinant interferon gamma and intravenous immunoglobulin. This review will focus on the treatment of adult atopic dermatitis.

The Use of Systemic Immune Moderators in Dermatology: An Update

In addition to corticosteroids, dermatologists have access to an array of immunomodulatory therapies. Azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil are the systemic immunosuppressive agents most commonly used by dermatologists. In addition, new developments in biotechnology have spurred the development of immunobiologic agents that are able to target the immunologic process of many inflammatory disorders at specific points along the inflammatory cascade. Alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab are the immunobiologic agents that are currently the most well known and most commonly used by dermatologists. This article reviews the pharmacology, mechanism of action, side effects, and clinical applications of these therapies.

Effective treatment of relapsing idiopathic nodular panniculitis (Pfeifer-Weber-Christian disease) with mycophenolate mofetil

Relapsing idiopathic nodular panniculitis is the term used to describe a group of diseases that presents as subcutaneous inflammatory nodules, fever and systemic symptoms and histopathologically displays inflammation within the fat lobules. There is no specific test for diagnosis and extensive investigations are required to exclude systemic causes of panniculitis. No uniform effective therapy is available and various drugs used include mainly corticosteroids alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive agents. Presented in this paper is an intractable case of idiopathic nodular panniculitis whose corticotherapy failed and could not be continued because of serious adverse effects. The rapid and good therapeutic response of the patient to mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy is discussed.

Mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide: promising compounds for the treatment of skin diseases

In the past decade, there has been enormous progress in the understanding of the pathomechanisms of immune-mediated diseases, which has led to major advances in immunotherapeutic strategies. As a consequence, the armamentarium of specific and nonspecific immune-modulating and immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of skin diseases has been widely extended. Among the nonspecific immunomodulators, mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide show promising effects in a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory skin disorders. Both compounds inhibit a key enzyme in nucleotide biosynthesis, a step that is pivotal for the production of cytotoxic T cells and antibody formation. They do not act in the nucleus, which may explain their advantageous side-effect profile.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is standard therapy for primary immunodeficiencies, Kawasaki Disease and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. More recently, the use of high dose IVIg (2 g/kg in divided doses) has widened to include a number of inflammatory diseases, including atopic eczema. The mechanism of IVIg's anti-inflammatory action has yet to be fully understood. Proposed mechanisms include modulation of IgE responses and a reduction in inflammatory cytokines with a reduction in T-cell proliferation. Antibacterial and antitoxin effects may also play a role.

Change of treatment from cyclosporin to mycophenolate mofetil in severe psoriasis

Eight patients whose severe psoriasis was treated with long-term cyclosporin (range 2-11 years; mean 7.6 years) were changed to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), because of nephrotoxicity in seven and hypertension and lack of efficacy in one. In five patients psoriasis control significantly deteriorated and in three patients disease control deteriorated slightly in periods ranging from 2 to 32 weeks. Renal function improved in all six patients with cyclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity treated with MMF for more than 2 weeks. From this data it would appear that MMF is not as effective as cyclosporin in controlling severe psoriasis. However, MMF did offer reasonable disease control in three of eight patients and allowed renal function to improve, and so may have a place in the treatment of some patients unable to take cyclosporin because of renal toxicity.