Successful treatment of linear IgA disease with salazosulphapyridine and intravenous immunoglobulins

Intravenous Immunoglobulins: Mode of Action and Indications in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Dermatoses

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), a mixture of variable amounts of proteins (albumin, IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE antibodies), as well as salt, sugar, solvents, and detergents, are successfully used to treat a variety of dermatological disorders. For decades, IVIGs have been administered for treatment of infectious diseases and immune deficiencies, since they contain natural antibodies that represent a first-line defense against pathogens. Today their indication has expanded, including the off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In dermatology, IVIGs are administered for treatment of different disorders at different therapeutic regimens, mostly with higher doses then those administered for treatment of infectious diseases. The aim of this prospective review is to highlight the indications, effectiveness, side effects, and perspectives of the systemic treatment with IVIGs for patients with severe, life-threatening, and resistant to conventional therapies autoimmune or inflammatory dermatoses.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: an update

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is being increasingly utilized as an off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions across various specialties. Numerous reports have shown that it is an effective treatment for autoimmune skin blistering disorders. Unlike most therapies for blistering disorders, IVIg is not immunosuppressive and has a favorable side effect profile. This has allowed its use to expand dramatically over the last decade. However, due to the rarity and severity of autoimmune skin blistering diseases, well-designed prospective trials are generally lacking. This work highlights major research developments and the best evidence to date regarding the treatment of autoimmune pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, pemphigoid gestationis, and linear IgA dermatosis with IVIg, providing an update on its efficacy, proposed mechanisms of action, side effect profile, and indications for use.

The use of i.v. IG therapy in dermatology

The intravenous administration of exogenous pooled human immunoglobulin (i.v. IG) was originally licensed as antibody replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies and there are currently six FDA-approved uses for this agent. Despite a current lack of FDA approval, off-label treatment of a multitude of dermatologic disorders with i.v. IG has shown exciting potential for this unique treatment modality. The diseases successfully treated with i.v. IG include autoimmune bullous diseases, connective tissue diseases, vasculitides, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and infectious disorders (such as streptococcal toxic shock syndrome). Currently the biggest drawback in the consideration of i.v. IG therapy in dermatologic disorders is the lack of randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, there is a significant body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of i.v. IG in patients with dermatologic disorders that are resistant to treatment with standard agents. In summary, i.v. IG constitutes a valuable and potentially life-saving agent in managing patients with a variety of dermatologic disorders under the appropriate circumstances.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins for the treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: evaluation of its use in 19 cases

BACKGROUND

The mainstay of therapy of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases has been prolonged high-dose systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. Recently, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been employed in selected cases, with excellent results in most of them.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the outcome of the use of IVIg in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases refractory to conventional therapy or with contraindications for it.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical response to monthly cycles of IVIg in 19 patients affected with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: 10 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), 2 with pemphigus foliaceus (PF), 4 with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), 2 with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and one with linear IgA bullous dermatosis.

RESULTS

Four (21%) of 19 cases presented a complete response (2 PV, 1 MMP and 1 epidermolysis bullosa acquisita). Five (26%) patients did not respond to the treatment (3 PV, 1 PF, 1 MMP). Ten patients (53%) had a partial response.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective noncontrolled study with a heterogeneous group of patients.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of IVIg was inferior to that previously reported. This difference could be attributed to the preparations employed, the different severity of the disease, or individual responses in each patient dependent on Fc receptor gamma polymorphisms.

Off-label uses of biologics in dermatology: Interferon and intravenous immunoglobulin (Part 1 of 2)

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include interferons, intravenous immunoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab, alefacept, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of these medications. However, numerous off-label uses have evolved. As part 1 of a 2-part series, this article will review the literature regarding the off-label uses of the interferons and intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology.

Off-Label Uses of Biologic Agents in Dermatology: A 2006 Update

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include adalimumab, alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab, IVIg, omalizumab, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the indications of these medications that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration; however, numerous off-label uses have evolved. To update the reader on more recent uses of the biologics for off-label dermatologic use, this article will emphasize more recent published data from 2005 through the date of submission in May 2006.