Sensitivity of human acute myeloid leukaemia to diphtheria toxin-GM-CSF fusion protein

Targeted Diphtheria Toxin-Based Therapy: A Review Article

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Conventional therapeutic strategies usually offer limited specificity, resulting in severe side effects and toxicity to normal tissues. Targeted cancer therapy, on the other hand, can improve the therapeutic potential of anti-cancer agents and decrease unwanted side effects. Targeted applications of cytolethal bacterial toxins have been found to be especially useful for the specific eradication of cancer cells. Targeting is either mediated by peptides or by protein-targeting moieties, such as antibodies, antibody fragments, cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), growth factors, or cytokines. Together with a toxin domain, these molecules are more commonly referred to as immunotoxins. Targeting can also be achieved through gene delivery and cell-specific expression of a toxin. Of the available cytolethal toxins, diphtheria toxin (DT) is one of the most frequently used for these strategies. Of the many DT-based therapeutic strategies investigated to date, two immunotoxins, Ontak^TM and Tagraxofusp^TM, have gained FDA approval for clinical application. Despite some success with immunotoxins, suicide-gene therapy strategies, whereby controlled tumor-specific expression of DT is used for the eradication of malignant cells, are gaining prominence. The first part of this review focuses on DT-based immunotoxins, and it then discusses recent developments in tumor-specific expression of DT.

Recombinant toxins in haematologic malignancies and solid tumours

Recombinant toxins constitute a new modality for the treatment of cancer, since they target cells displaying specific surface-receptors or antigens. They are fusion proteins, which contain toxin and ligand regions, and are produced in Escherichia coli. The ligand may be a growth factor or a fragment of an antibody, and the toxin is usually one of the two bacterial toxins: Pseudomonas exotoxin and diphtheria toxin. Compared to the earlier generation chemical conjugates of ligands and toxins, recombinant toxins have many advantages, including homogeneity with respect to the connection between the ligand and toxin, ease and yield of production and small size. A variety of chemotherapy-resistant haematologic and solid tumours have been targeted with recombinant toxins, and clinical trials with many of them have recently demonstrated their effectiveness. Moreover, their unwanted toxic effects are different from those of most chemotherapeutic agents, supporting the expectation that they can be combined with existing modalities to improve the clinical resources available to treat cancer in humans.

IBC's international Conference on Novel Therapeutic Proteins for Oncology (drug discovery and development)

It is estimated that 564,800 Americans will die of cancer in 1998. Even though earlier detection and healthier lifestyles may have led to some improvements in cancer mortality, new agents are urgently needed to treat incurable cancers. At the recent International Conference on Novel Therapeutic Proteins for Oncology, a wide range of new agents and strategies for targeting tumour cells were discussed. Many of these will be reviewed here.

Variable cytotoxicity of diphtheria toxin 388-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor fusion protein for acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells

In this study, the utility of DT388-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for the ex vivo purging and direct administration to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is tested using clonogenic assays, long-term cultures (LTC), and NOD/SCID mice as assays for leukemic progenitors. We compare the ability of 24-hour exposure to 0.3 microg/mL (4 nM) DT388-GM-CSF to kill AML colony forming cells (CFC) and the more primitive AML progenitors detected after 6 weeks in stromal cocultures (AML LTC-initiating cells or AML LTC-IC) and after 8 weeks in NOD/SCID mice.AML samples (n = 10), expressing a mean of 35 to 1466 GM-CSF receptors/blast, showed mean (range) percent kills of AML CFC and LTC-IC of 61 (17-98) and 46 (0-94) respectively with a direct correlation (r = 0.69) between the % kills detected in the in vitro assays. Among 5 evaluable samples the percent reduction in AML cell engraftment in NOD/SCID marrow following ex vivo DT388-GM-CSF treatment varied from 38% to 100%. 40% to 56% of normal bone marrow CFC and 31% to 48% of normal LTC-IC survived the same ex vivo treatment (n = 3). In subsequent experiments, NOD/SCID mice received AML blast cell injections intravenously followed in 24 hours by 1.5 microg DT388-GM-CSF daily intraperitoneally for 5 days. A reduction of marrow blast cells was seen with 7 of 9 samples tested 4 to 12 weeks post one course of toxin. Repeating the 5-day course of toxin 2 or 3 times at 4-week intervals did not improve the response, while delaying administration until 4 to 8 weeks post AML cell injection reduced the toxin's effectiveness (n = 5).This fusion toxin may prove useful for in vitro purging of stem cell harvests from selected AML patients and for direct administration to such patients.