Mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells: randomized evaluations of different doses of filgrastim

Successful autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection using large volume leukapheresis in patients with very low or undetectable peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells

Autologous stem cell transplantation provides some patients with hematolymphoid and solid organ malignancies an opportunity for cure. Management of peripheral hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collections differs among institutions, especially if a very low pre-procedure peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (PBCD34) is demonstrated. This study retrospectively analyzed results of large-volume peripheral HSC collections in 91 patients over approximately two years. Fifteen patients with PBCD34 < 10 × 10e6/l (eleven with undetectable PBCD34) were compared to 76 patients with higher counts on the first collection day (adequate mobilizers). The poor mobilizer group had significantly lower pre-collection WBC and platelet counts as well as collection yields. However, most patients with PBCD34 < 10 × 10e6/l (80 %) collected the minimum target for HSC transplant (2.0 × 10e6 CD34+ cells/kg) in <5 consecutive days of collection, and those who did collect the minimum successfully underwent autologous transplantation, with hematopoietic engraftment and long-term survival comparable to the adequate mobilizers. Successful HSC collection may often be achieved regardless of d 1 PBCD34 counts.

Circulatory miR-155 correlation with platelet and neutrophil recovery after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a multivariate analysis

The involvement of microRNAs in the regulation of hematopoietic stem cells paves the way for their use in the management of autologous HSC transplantation (AHSCT). We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of circulatory microRNAs in extracellular vesicles (EVs) and plasma in platelet and neutrophil engraftment. Circulatory miR-125b, mir-126, miR-150, and miR-155 expression was assessed in isolated EVs and plasma in samples collected from AHSCT candidates. Multivariate analysis, COX models, and ROC assessment were performed to evaluate the predictive values of these microRNAs in platelet and neutrophil engraftment. miR-155 expression following conditioning with other clinical factors such as chemotherapy courses after diagnosis was the most significant predictors of platelet/neutrophil engraftment. A CD34⁺ cell count ≥ 3.5 × 10⁶/kg combined with miR-155 could be used as an engraftment predictor; however, in cases where the CD34⁺ cell count was < 3.5 × 10⁶/kg, this parameter lost its predictive value for engraftment and could be replaced by miR-155. The correlation between miR-155 and platelet/neutrophil engraftment even with lower numbers of CD34⁺ cells suggests the importance of this microRNA in the prediction of AHSCT outcome. Moreover, miR-155 could be utilized in therapeutic approaches to provide a better outcome for patients undergoing AHSCT.

Prolonged Lenalidomide Therapy Does Not Impact Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Since the introduction of lenalidomide into induction therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), there have been conflicting reports about its impact on autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. We evaluated the impact of previous lenalidomide exposure in a large cohort of patients with MM undergoing mobilization and collection at a tertiary stem cell transplantation center. We hypothesized that collection of PBSCs is feasible even with a prolonged duration of previous lenalidomide therapy. We examined patients with MM who attempted stem cell mobilization and collection, seen at our center between January 2012 and July 2015. The patients were categorized into 3 groups for analysis: (1) patients with previous receipt of >6 cycles lenalidomide, (2) patients with previous receipt of ≤6 cycles of lenalidomide, and (3) patients without previous lenalidomide exposure. We compared collection yields and days of apheresis among the 3 groups using linear regression analysis. We identified 297 patients with MM who underwent mobilization of PBSCs. Of these, 35 had received >6 cycles of lenalidomide (median, 8 cycles; range, 7 to 25 cycles), 156 had received ≤6 cycles of lenalidomide (median, 4 cycles; range, 1 to 6 cycles), and 106 had received no lenalidomide. Prior lenalidomide exposure did not have a statistically significant impact on the absolute number of CD34⁺ cells collected or on the duration of collection based on a multivariate linear regression analysis for association between receipt of >6 cycles of lenalidomide. In this retrospective analysis of MM patients undergoing autologous PBSC transplantation, we show that the duration of previous lenalidomide exposure does not impact the total number of PBSCs collected or the number of days of apheresis. These data suggest that longer courses of induction therapy with lenalidomide-containing regimens to achieve a maximum response can be safe without impairing the ability to collect PBSCs, and that limiting lenalidomide use before mobilization does not appear warranted in all cases.

Comparison and cost analysis of three protocols for mobilization and apheresis of haematopoietic progenitor cells

INTRODUCTION

Autologous bone marrow transplantation is a component of the malignant hemopathy therapy. The preferred mobilization and collection method is apheresis. The aim of this study is to compare three protocols analyzing the effect of plerixafor, higher dose of G-CSF and large volume leukapheresis (LVL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including 119 patients referred for mobilization. Three protocols were compared: (a) G-CSF 10 μg/kg/day subcutaneous (sc) × 4 days mobilizing 1 to 1.5 blood volumes. (b) G-CSF 10 μg/kg/day sc × 4 days + plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day sc preventively or as a rescue agent mobilizing 1 to 1.5 blood volumes. (c) G-CSF 20 μg/kg/day sc × 4 days ± plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day sc preventively or as a rescue agent mobilizing 3 to 4 blood volumes.

RESULTS

The average number of days of apheresis was reduced to 1.37 with protocol 3. The average cost per patient was reduced by 67% compared with protocol 2 and increased by only 5% compared with protocol 1, reducing the failure rate to 0%.

CONCLUSION

Adding preemptive or rescue plerixafor (protocol 2) to G-CSF 10 μg/kg/day alone (protocol 1) did not improve the days of apheresis nor the number of CD34+ cells collected but had higher cost and failure rate. Using LVL, plerixafor and G-CSF 20 μg/kg/day (protocol 3) decreased the number of sessions to 1.37, reduced the failure rate to 0% and led to a significant increase in the number of CD34+ cells collected without toxicity and with a similar cost to protocol 1.

Poor mobilizer and its countermeasures

Mobilization failure is a major concern in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation, especially in an autologous setting, as almost all donor harvests can be accomplished with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. Poor mobilizers, defined as those with a peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell count ≤20 cells/μl after mobilization preceding apheresis is a significant risk factor for mobilization failure. We recommend preemptive plerixafor plus G-CSF (filgrastim, 10 μg/kg daily) as a first mobilization strategy, which yields sufficient peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in almost all patients and avoids otherwise unnecessary remobilization. Preemptive plerixafor is administered in patients with a day-4 peripheral blood CD34⁺ count <15, depending on the disease and the target PBPC amount. Cyclophosphamide is reserved for patients who fail the first PBPC collection. We recommend second mobilization for patients who could not achieve a sufficient PBPC amount with the first mobilization. In these patients, a second attempt with plerixafor plus G-CSF or mobilization with plerixafor in combination with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF is recommended. Increased dose and/or twice daily administration of G-CSF can be considered.

Management of mobilization failure in 2017

In contemporary clinical practice, almost all allogeneic transplantations and autologous transplantations now capitalize on peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as opposed to bone marrow (BM) for the source of stem cells. In this context, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays a pivotal role as the most frequently applied frontline agent for stem cell mobilization. For patients classified as high-risk, chemotherapy based mobilization regimens can be preferred as a first choice and it is notable that this also used for remobilization. Mobilization failure occurs at a rate of 10%-40% with traditional strategies and it typically leads to low-efficiency practices, resource wastage, and delayed in treatment intervention. Notably, however, several factors can impact the effectiveness of CD34⁺ progenitor cell mobilization, including patient age and medical history (prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, disease and marrow infiltration at the time of mobilization). In recent years, main (yet largely ineffective) approach was to increase G-CSF dose and add SCF, but novel and promising pathways have been opened up by the synergistic impact of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF. The literature shows to its favorable results in upfront and failed mobilizers, and it is necessary to use plerixafor (or equivalent agents) to optimize HSC harvest in poor mobilizers. Different CXCR4 inhibitors, growth hormone, VLA4 inhibitors, and parathormone, have been cited as new agents for mobilization failure in recent years. In view of the above considerations, the purpose of this paper is to examine the mobilization of PBSC while focusing specifically on poor mobilizers.

How to manage poor mobilizers for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation?

Today, peripheral blood stem cells are the preferred source of stem cells over bone marrow. Therefore, mobilization plays a crutial role in successful autologous stem cell transplantation. Poor mobilization is generally defined as failure to achieve the target level of at least 2×10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg body weight. There are several strategies to overcome poor mobilization: 1) Larger volume Leukapheresis (LVL) 2) Re-mobilization 3) Plerixafor 4) CM+Plerixafor (P)+G-CSF and 5) Bone Marrow Harvest. In this review, the definitions of successful and poor mobilization are discussed. Management strategies for poor mobilization are defined. The recent research on new agents are included.

The current status in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

Hemotopoietic stem cell mobilization with cytokines alone, has still been widely accepted as the initial attempt for stem cell mobilization. Chemotherapy based mobilization can be preferred as first choice in high risk patients or for remobilization. But mobilization failure still remains to be a problem in one third of patients. Salvage mobilization strategies have been composed to give one more chance to 'poor mobilizers'. Synergistic effect of a reversible inhibitor of CXCR4, plerixafor, with G-CSF has opened a new era for these patients. Preemptive approach in predicted poor mobilizers, immediate salvage approach for patients with suboptimal mobilization or remobilization approach of plerixafor in failed mobilizers have all been demonstrated convincing results in various studies. Alternative CXCR4 inhibitors, VLA4 inhibitors, bortezomib, parathormone have also been emerged as novel agents for mobilization failure.

The effect of gradual increment in rhG-CSF dose on stem cell yields in patients with multiple myeloma mobilized with intermediate dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF

Cyclophosphamide along with recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is a commonly used strategy for mobilization. However, the optimal timing for rhG-CSF initiation after cyclophosphamide has not been determined as conclusively as has the G-CSF dose. In this paper, we aimed to present gradual dose increment of rhG-CSF between the third day of mobilization and time to apheresis that is started with 5 μg/kg (from day 3 to day 7) and continued with 10 μg/kg (from day 8 to time to apheresis) for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and its effect on stem cell yield and mobilization success. Data from 30 consecutive patients with MM who underwent PBSC mobilization between October 2011 and June 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. While twenty-eight of 30 patients (93.3%) were successfully mobilized, 2 patients (6.7%) had mobilization failure. The final median CD34+ cell dose harvested from the patients was 9.5×10(6)/kg. The median number of apheresis was 2.5 (range, 0-3). Twenty-four patients (80%) yielded >2×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one apheresis procedure. In conclusion, our regimen might be used to decrease the mobilization failure regarding the low dose rhG-CSF use and provide a cost effective strategy.

Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a well-established treatment for malignancies such as multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphomas. Various changes in the field over the past decade, including the frequent use of tandem aHSCT in MM, the advent of novel therapies for the treatment of MM and lymphoma, and the addition of new stem cell mobilization techniques, have led to the need to reassess current stem cell mobilization strategies. Mobilization failures with traditional strategies are common and result in delays in treatment and increased cost and resource utilization. Recently, plerixafor-containing strategies have been shown to significantly reduce mobilization failure rates, but the ideal method to maximize stem cell yields and minimize costs associated with collection has not yet been determined. A panel of experts convened to discuss the currently available data on autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation and to devise guidelines to optimize mobilization strategies. Herein is a summary of their discussion and consensus.

Pharmacoeconomics of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: an overview of current evidence and gaps in the literature

Adequate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and collection is required prior to proceeding with high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Cytokines such as G-CSF, GM-CSF, and peg-filgrastim, alone or in combination with plerixafor, and after chemotherapy have been used to mobilize HSCs. Studies have shown that the efficiency of HSC mobilization and collection may vary when different methods of mobilization are used. No studies have shown that survival is significantly affected by the method of mobilization, but some studies have suggested that cost and resource utilization may be different between different mobilization techniques. After the FDA approval of plerixafor with G-CSF to mobilize HSCs many transplant centers became concerned about the cost of HSC mobilization. A panel of experts was convened ant this paper reviews the current literature on the pharmacoeconomics of HSC mobilization.

Successful mobilization with AMD3100 and filgrastim with engraftment of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in a heavily pretreated pediatric patient with recurrent Burkitt lymphoma

The authors report a case of a 13-year-old female with recurrent Burkitt lymphoma who was heavily pretreated with chemotherapy. During chemotherapy for relapse, she developed serious aspergillus infection of the palate and sinuses. Despite 10 microg/kg of filgrastim for 5 days, peripheral blood CD34(+) cells remained <or=1/microL. Hematopoietic progenitor cells were subsequently successfully mobilized with a combination of AMD3100 and filgrastim without tumor or fungus contamination. After transplantation, the patient achieved complete engraftment without exacerbation of fungal infection. This is the first case report of a pediatric patient with relapsed Burkitt lymphoma with mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells by AMD3100 without any adverse reactions.

Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

This phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients received G-CSF (10 microg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 microg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until more than or equal to 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who collected more than or equal to 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in less than or equal to 2 aphereses. A total of 106 of 148 (71.6%) patients in the plerixafor group and 53 of 154 (34.4%) patients in the placebo group met the primary endpoint (P < .001). A total of 54% of plerixafor-treated patients reached target after one apheresis, whereas 56% of the placebo-treated patients required 4 aphereses to reach target. The most common adverse events related to plerixafor were gastrointestinal disorders and injection site reactions. Plerixafor and G-CSF were well tolerated, and significantly more patients collected the optimal CD34(+) cell/kg target for transplantation earlier compared with G-CSF alone. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00103662.

Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Given the potential to limit cost, we conducted a pilot study evaluating delayed, low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following chemotherapy for the procurement of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for autologous transplantation and reviewed the relevant literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with various malignancies received cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m(2) and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF 300 microg/d or 480 microg/d starting day +5 until two to four daily large volume leukapheresis yielded > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells. We searched MEDLINE, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases from 1990 to the present to identify papers on PBPC procurement using delayed G-CSF (starting day +4 or later) following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

G-CSF was administered for a median of 9 days at an average cost of 1260 USD per 70-kg patient. Collection was initiated at a median of 12 days after chemotherapy. A median 2.5 (range 2-4) apheresis were performed yielding an average daily CD34+ collection of 6.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.35-56.7). After one apheresis, 82% and 57% of patients collected > or =2.5 x 10(6)/kg and > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Ultimately, 89% collected > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg. Febrile neutropenia and catheter-related infection developed in five and two patients, respectively. All patients proceeded to transplantation and engrafted successfully with a median of 14.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.05-113) cells infused. Eleven published reports were identified involving 590 patients of whom 498 received G-CSF at a dose range of 250 microg/d to 10 microg/kg/d starting day +4 to 15 for a period of 4 to 9 days for PBPC procurement. Among these reports, 62 to 100% and 33 to 96% of patients collected > or =2 to 2.5 x 10(6) and > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of delayed, low-dose G-CSF plus chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization was feasible and provides further evidence supporting this potentially cost-effective strategy. A review of the literature supports our findings and emphasizes the need for larger studies to address this issue.

Mobilization, harvesting and selection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized in 130 patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using cyclophosphamide 2 g/m(2) and either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 mcg/kg/day (for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, SPMS) or G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day (for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), Crohn's disease (CD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and other immune-mediated disorders). Mobilization-related mortality was 0.8% (one of 130) secondary to infection. Circulating peripheral blood (PB) CD34(+) cells/microl differed significantly by disease. Collected CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis and overall collection efficiency was significantly better using Spectra apheresis device compared to the Fenwall CS3000 instrument. Patients with SLE and RRMS achieved the lowest and the highest CD34(+) cell yields, respectively. Ex vivo CD34(+) cell selection employing Isolex 300iv2.5 apparatus was significantly more efficient compared to CEPRATE CS device. Circulating PB CD34(+) cells/microl correlated positively with initial CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis and enriched product CD34(+) cells/kg. Mean WBC and platelet engraftment (ANC>0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l) occurred on days 9 and 11, respectively. Infused CD34(+) cell/kg dose showed significant direct correlation with faster white blood cell (WBC) and platelet engraftment. When adjusted for CD34(+) cell/kg dose, patients treated with a myeloablative regimen had significantly slower WBC and platelet recovery compared to non-myeloablative regimens.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Once- versus Twice-Daily Filgrastim for Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors

Although the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells from normal donors using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is widely used, the ideal method for the administration of filgrastim has not been determined. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization on day 4 of filgrastim between once-daily (group O) and twice-daily (group T) administration of filgrastim at 400 microg/m(2)/d. In all, 38 and 34 donors were randomly assigned to groups O and T, respectively. The number of CD34(+) cells collected on day 4 was not significantly different (1.74 x 10(6) cells/kg in group O and 2.08 x 10(6) cells/kg in group T, P = .37). The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in the two groups. The baseline white blood cell count was the strongest predictor of poor mobilization. Donor age, sex, and serum concentrations of several cytokines did not significantly affect the CD34(+) cell yield. In conclusion, once-daily administration of filgrastim at 400 microg/m(2)/d appeared to be appropriate for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells in normal donors when apheresis is planned on day 4 of filgrastim. Selection of a donor with a steady-state white blood cell count of 5.0 x 10(9)/L or more may lead to a lower incidence of poor mobilization.

Peripheral blood mobilization of different lymphocyte and dendritic cell subsets with the use of intermediate doses of G-CSF in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma

Between June 2003 and November 2004, we collected mobilized peripheral blood units from 29 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. They received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (16 micro g/kg/day) for a total of 5 days. Immediately before and 3 h after the fourth and fifth dose of G-CSF, we performed flow cytometry analysis to quantify: T cells (CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+), B cells (CD19+), NK cells (CD3-CD16+CD56+), NKT cells (CD3+CD16+CD56+), type 1 dendritic cells (DC1) (lin-HLA-DR+CD11c+), type 2 dendritic cells (DC2) (lin-HLA-DR+CD123+), regulatory T cells (Tregs) (CD4+CD25+), and activated T cells (CD3+HLA-DR+). All cell subsets were mobilized after G-CSF treatment with the exception of B, NK, and NKT lymphocytes. The median number of Treg cells before and after G-CSF was statistically different (29+/-14.9x10(6)/l vs 70.1+/-46.1x10(6)/l, P<0.02). DCs were mobilized significantly with a 5.9-fold increase in DC2 (15.1+/-30.3x10(6)/l vs 89.8+/-81.0x10(6)/l, P<0.02) and a 2.6-fold increase for DC1 (41+/-42.5x10(6)/l vs 109.5+/-58.0x10(6)/l, P<0.04). Patients received a mean of 3.1+/-1.2x10(7)/kg NK cells, 1.3+/-0.9x10(7)/kg NKT cells, 0.41+/-0.29x10(7)/kg DC1, 0.2+/-0.22x10(7)/kg DC2, and 1.8+/-1.9x10(7)/kg Tregs. In conclusion, intermediate doses of G-CSF induce mobilization of different lymphocyte subsets, with the exception of B, NK, and NKT cells. The mobilization of certain suppressive populations (DC2 and Treg) could be in theory deleterious, at least in patients with cancer.

Safety and effectiveness of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in mobilizing stem cells and improving cytokine profile in advanced chronic heart failure

The objective of this study was to determine a safe and effective dose of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells in patients with advanced heart failure and to determine its effects on the cytokine profile. Patients with advanced heart failure (n = 6) and implantable defibrillators in situ were administered G-CSF after baseline echocardiographic and laboratory evaluation, using an escalating dose schedule designed to ensure safety. The peripheral CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell count increased from 3.6 +/- 0.5/microl to 38.7 +/- 13/microl (p= 0.022) after 5 days of 5 microg/kg/day G-CSF therapy. The baseline or peak white blood cell count did not predict the stem cell response. G-CSF increased plasma levels of interleukin-10. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly in the 4 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy 9 months after treatment. No major adverse effects attributable to the drug occurred during administration or 9 months of follow-up. Our results have shown that low-dose G-CSF significantly mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in advanced heart failure and improved left ventricular function in the ischemic subset of patients. G-CSF significantly increased plasma levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10, without changing pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. In conclusion, these results indicate a novel mechanism of action for the potential therapeutic benefit of G-CSF in advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy.

ESHAP+fixed dose G-CSF as autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell and Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single institution result of 127 patients

From 1996 to November 2004, 131 consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD) received ESHAP as mobilization chemotherapy before autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients received fixed dose G-CSF 300 microg SC bid starting 24-36 h after finishing mobilizing ESHAP. In all, four patients failed mobilization and are excluded. Characteristics of 127 patients: 68 males: 59 females. DLCL 49: HD 78. Initial stage I:II:III:IV:unknown was 15:34:33:42:3. Median age at ASCT 26 years. Median prior chemotherapy cycles were six [<6 (17 patients), 6-8 (90 patients), >8 (20 patients)]. Median ESHAP cycle used as mobilizer was third. Patients required 1, 2, 3, 4 apheresis were 93:25:8:1. Median total CD34+ cells/kg collected were 6.9 x 10(6) (DLCL 5.17 x 10(6) and HD 7.6 x 10(6)), patients weighing < or = 70 kg (93 patients) 6.54 x 10(6) and >70 kg (34 patients) 7.44 x 10(6) (P = 0.59), one apheresis (93 patients) 8.6 x 10(6)/kg and >1 apheresis (34 patients) 4.5 x 10(6) (P = 0.001). We conclude that ESHAP and G-CSF 300 microg SC bid is an effective mobilizing regimen even in patients >70 kg and most patients require only 1-2 apheresis.

Hourly monitoring of circulating CD34+ cells to optimize timing of autologous apheresis in pediatric patients

In order to increase the CD34+ cell yield in children undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation, the optimum time of apheresis after G-CSF administration has still to be found. We prospectively studied the mobilization of CD34+ cells and white blood cells in the peripheral blood (PB) of 20 pediatric patients before leukapheresis. The monitoring schedule covered 12 h, with blood samples taken before and at 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 h after G-CSF administration when 10 CD34+ cells/mul were reached. CD34+ cells were measured by flow cytometric analysis both in the single- and dual-platform setting. Two different patterns of mobilization (POM) emerged: 12 patients showed an increase in CD34+ cells in PB during the first 4 h after G-CSF (POM I), while eight patients had an initial decrease of CD34+ cells. However, all patients together showed a significant increase of CD34+ cells about 10 h after G-CSF administration. Further studies with more patients, using an enhanced monitoring schedule will be required to refine the results.

CD4+CD25+Lymphocyte and Dendritic Cell Mobilization with Intermediate Doses of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Healthy Donors

We prospectively conducted a quantitative and phenotypic analysis of T, B, natural killer (NK), NKT, type 1 and 2 dendritic cells (DC), and regulatory T cells, before and after mobilization with intermediate doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (16 microg/kg per day). Between November, 2003, and December, 2004, we collected stem cells from 25 HLA identical sibling donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Before mobilization and 3 h after the fourth and fifth doses of G-CSF, blood samples were taken for blood counts and flow cytometry. The median number of regulatory T cells before and after G-CSF was statistically different (69 +/- 41 x 10(6)/L versus 161 +/- 159 x 10(6)/L, p < 0.01). We observed a 1.7-fold increase in NK and NKT cells (p < 0.009 and p < 0.02, respectively). DC were mobilized with a 11.5-fold increase in type 2 (p < 0.004) and a 8.5-fold increase in type 1 DC (p < 0.003). The patients received a mean of: 2.2 x 10(7)/kg +/- 1.4 x 10(7)/kg of NK cells, 0.95 x 10(7)/kg +/- 0.81 x 107/kg of NKT cells, 0.43 x 107/kg +/- 0.53 x 10(7)/kg of type 1 DC, 0.3 v 10(7)/kg +/- 0.45 x 10(7)/kg of type 2 DC and 1.4 x 10(7)/kg +/- 1.2 x 10(7)/kg of regulatory T cells. Using intermediate doses of G-CSF, we have demonstrated the mobilization of different lymphocyte subsets, in particular regulatory T cells and DC, which can be expanded later and used in the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases.

Combined administration of alpha-erythropoietin and filgrastim can improve the outcome and cost balance of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders

We compared the use of G-CSF plus EPO in a group of 32 multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients with historical controls receiving G-CSF alone. Haemopoietic reconstitution was significantly faster in patients receiving G-CSF+EPO (group B), with a median time of 10 days to achieve an ANC count >0.5 x 10(9)/l, compared to 11 days in the historical group (A). The median duration of severe neutropenia (ANC count <100/ml) was significantly shorter in group B compared to group A; platelet counts >20 x 10(9) and >50 x 10(9)/l were achieved at days + 13 and + 17, respectively in group B, compared to days + 14 and + 24, respectively, in group A (P = 0.015, 0.002) patients. The transfusion requirement was reduced in group B, with 0 (0-6) RBC units and 1 (0-5) platelet unit transfused in group B vs 2 RBC (0-9) and 2 platelet units (0-8) in group A. Median days of fever, antibiotic therapy and hospital stay were reduced in group B (9.5 days vs 22). The mean cost of autotransplantation per group A patient was 23,988 Euro, compared with 18,394 Euro for a group B patient. Our study suggests that the EPO + G-CSF combination not only accelerates engraftment kinetics, but can also improve the clinical course of ASCT.

The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

BACKGROUND

Failure to mobilize PBPCs for auto-logous transplantation has mostly been attributed to previous therapy and poses therapeutic problems.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The role of underlying disease was analyzed in 17 of 73 (23%) patients with PBPC mobilization failure, and secondary mobilization with high-dose filgrastim was attempted.

RESULTS

Of 16 patients with acute leukemia, 13 (81%) mobilized poorly. In contrast, of 57 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and solid tumor, 53 (93%, p < 0.001) showed good PBPC mobilization. Relapsed disease did not predispose to poor mobilization. As secondary mobilization attempt, 7 patients received 25 micro g per kg per day filgrastim without chemotherapy leading to a 3.7 +/- 2.8-fold (SD) increase in the maximum number of circulating CD34+ cells (p = 0.104). PBPC apheresis yielded 3.3 (+/-0.5) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight in 5 patients. Four poor mobilizers received 50 micro g per kg per day filgrastim as second or third mobilization attempt. Circulating CD34+ cells in these patients increased by 1.5 (+/-0.7) compared with the primary G-CSF application.

CONCLUSION

Selective PBPC mobilization failure was seen in patients with acute leukemia whereas remarkably good mobilization was seen in other malignancies. Increasing the filgrastim dose to 25 micro g per kg per day may allow PBPC collection in patients failing PBPC mobilization.

Analysis of remobilization success in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplants who fail an initial mobilization: risk factors, cytokine use and cost

Inadequate stem cell mobilization is seen in approximately 25% of patients undergoing autotransplantation for hematologic malignancies. Remobilization strategies include chemotherapy/cytokine combinations or high-dose cytokines alone or in combination. From 1/1997 to 7/2002, we remobilized 86 patients who failed an initial mobilization (median total CD34=0.72 x 10(6)/kg) in sequential cohorts using high-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) or G-CSF(10 microg/kg/day)+GM-CSF (5 microg/kg/day). No difference in CD34/kg yields were seen (G-CSF alone: 2.2 x 10(6) and G-CSF+GM-CSF 1.6 x 10(6)) in the median 3 aphereses performed (P=0.333). Of the 86, 23 (27%) failed the second mobilization; 14 were remobilized again (yield=1.5 x 10(6) CD34/kg; three aphereses). Of the 86, 93% went to transplant: three progressed, and three had inadequate stem cells. Significant risk factors for a failed remobilization were: number of stem-cell-damaging regimens (P=0.015), time between last chemotherapy and first mobilization (P=0.028), and higher WBC at initiation of first mobilization (P=0.04). High-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) was more costly @ USD $9,016, vs $5,907 for the G-CSF+GM-CSF combination (P<0.001). Most patients failing an initial mobilization benefit from a cytokine only remobilization. Lower cost G-CSF+GM-CSF is as effective as high-dose G-CSF.

Effect of prior chemotherapy on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

A number of studies have suggested that prior chemotherapy correlates negatively with the efficiency of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. However, little data exist with regard to the relative effects of the specific chemotherapeutic drug classes. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 201 consecutive patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing CD34+ cell mobilization with chemotherapy+granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The number of prior chemotherapy courses correlated negatively with the peripheral CD34+ cell concentration (pCD34) on the first day of collection (P<0.001). No significant correlation was found for age, gender, tumor primary, mobilization chemotherapy regimen, disease status, marrow involvement, prior radiation therapy, or dose and timing of G-CSF administration. When the number of courses of individual classes of chemotherapeutic agents was correlated with pCD34, only exposures to platinum compounds (P=0.001) and alkylating agents (P=0.01) were found to be independent negative predictive factors for pCD34. Within classes, DNA crosslinking agents and etoposide appeared possibly more damaging than DNA methylating agents and doxorubicin, respectively. None of the drug classes showed evidence of recovery. We conclude that exposure to chemotherapy, especially platinum compounds and alkylating agents, should be minimized prior to mobilization.

Phase III trial of paclitaxel at two dose levels, the higher dose accompanied by filgrastim at two dose levels in platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer: an intergroup study

PURPOSE

To determine if increasing the dose of paclitaxel increases the probability of clinical response, progression-free survival, or overall survival in women who have persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer, and whether doubling the dose of prophylactic filgrastim accompanying the higher paclitaxel dose decreases the frequency of neutropenic fever.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consenting patients with persistent, recurrent, or progressing ovarian cancer, despite first-line platinum therapy (but no prior taxane), were randomly assigned to paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, 175 mg/m2, or 250 mg/m2 over 24 hours every 3 weeks. Patients receiving paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 were also randomly assigned to 5 or 10 microg/kg of filgrastim per day subcutaneously.

RESULTS

Accession to the paclitaxel 135-mg/m2 arm was closed early. Among the 271 patients on the other regimens with measurable disease, partial and complete response on paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 (36%) was significantly higher than on 175 mg/m2 (27%, P =.027). This difference was more evident among patients who never responded to prior platinum. However, progression-free and overall survival results were similar. The median durations of overall survival were 13.1 and 12.3 months for paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2, respectively. Thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and myalgia were greater with paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 (P <.05). The incidence of neutropenic fever after the first cycle of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 was 19% and 18% on the 5-microg/kg and 10-microg/kg filgrastim dose, respectively (22% for paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 without filgrastim).

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel exhibits a dose effect with regard to response rate, but there is more toxicity and no survival benefit to justify paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 plus filgrastim. Doubling the filgrastim dose from 5 to 10 microg/kg did not reduce the probability of neutropenic fever after high-dose paclitaxel.

Second mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with poor first mobilization

The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of 2 second mobilization (MB) protocols in 2 groups of patients who failed to obtain enough peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in the first MB. In 1 group (8 patients), 10 microg/kg of G-CSF was administered, and in the other group (8 patients), a double dosage (10 microg/kg twice a day) was administered. Both groups of patients received Cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/kg) 10 days before the apheresis. No difference was found among both groups of patients in diagnosis, previous chemotherapy, and time elapsed after the first MB. Administration of higher doses of G-CSF decreased the number of apheresis needed in the second MB to complete 2 x 10(6)/kg of CD34+ cells. It also increased the number of patients who achieved sufficient CD34+, namely, 75% versus 50%.

Phase III randomized study comparing 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with chemotherapy, followed by intensification and autologous transplantation in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether increasing the dose of filgrastim after mobilizing chemotherapy improves collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and leads to faster hematopoietic engraftment after autologous transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial was carried out in patients with breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, in which patients were randomized to receive 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim after standard chemotherapy to mobilize PBPCs. After high-dose chemotherapy, the components from the first two leukapheresis procedures were returned, and all patients received 5 microg per kg day of filgrastim after transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were randomized, of whom 128 were mobilized (Group A, 5 microg/kg, n = 66; Group B, 10 microg/kg, n = 62) and 112 were transplanted. Only six patients were not transplanted because of insufficient CD34+ cell numbers. The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the first two leukapheresis procedures tended to be higher in Group B than in Group A (12.0 vs. 7.2 x 10(6)/kg, NS), but after transplantation there was no significant difference in median times to platelet (9 days in both groups) or neutrophil (8 days in both groups) engraftment or the number of platelet transfusions (three in both groups). A subsequent subgroup analysis separating patients transplanted after first- or second-line chemotherapy also showed no measurable impact of filgrastim dose on the median CD34+ cell yield or on platelet engraftment in either subgroup.

CONCLUSION

PBPC mobilization with chemotherapy and 5 microg per kg of filgrastim is very efficient, and 10 microg per kg of filgrastim does not provide additional clinical benefit.

Factors influencing the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and non-myeloid malignancies

Factors influencing the collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were studied in 182 mobilization procedures performed on 145 consecutive patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML; n=67) and with various non-myeloid malignancies (NMM; n=78). PBSC were collected following mobilization with chemotherapy, treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Fewer colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophages (CFU-GMs) were collected from patients with AML than from patients with NMM (P<0.0001), although there were no differences in the numbers of CD34+ cells collected between both groups. Multiple regression analysis showed that chemotherapy alone was predictive of a low CD34+ yield in patients with NMM (regression coefficient (RC)=-2.1; P=0.003). In addition, the interactions "diagnosis mutliple myeloma (MM)xmobilization with chemotherapy" (RC=2.9; P=0.004) and "diagnosis MMxmobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF" (RC=2.1; P=0.04) also remained in the model, both showing a favorable influence. In AML, mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF was associated with higher CD34+ yields (P=0.003). In this subgroup of patients, multiple regression analysis identified the number of cycles of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 cycles; RC=1.3; P=0.03) and peripheral blood counts (WBC > or =1.5 x 10(9)/l and monocytes >20%; RC=0.8; P=0.02) as the factors most predictive of CD34+ cell yield. These findings emphasize the need to optimize harvesting technique to enhance safety and minimize morbidity and costs of this valuable procedure.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone at 12 microg/kg twice a day for 4 days for peripheral blood progenitor cell priming in pediatric patients

In children, the optimal mobilization schedule for harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is an issue of continuous research. We have studied a schedule based on high and daily divided doses of G-CSF (12 microg/kg body weight twice daily) for 4 days for PBPC priming. Toxicity related to G-CSF was observed in 13 patients (23%), mainly mild bone pain and myalgia. The median CD34(+)cell number collected was 4.4 (0.4-35 x 10(6)/kg body weight), with 46 patients achieving 2 x 10(6)/kg body weight (83.6%) after a single large volume leukapheresis. In conclusion, this mobilization schedule allows safe and efficient collection of the minimum target CD34(+) cell dose in most pediatric patients by only one procedure.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in low-weight children

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are substituting bone marrow as a source of stem cells for either autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Several papers have been published on the experience of various groups in their mobilization and transplantation in children. Some technical problems have derived from the size of the patient or donor in the pediatric setting. Thereby, there is some concern regarding leukapheresis in very small children (weighing less than 15-20 kg). This paper summarizes our own data and that of other groups for the mobilization and collection of PBPC in the smallest children. Data from the literature show that mobilization with cytokines alone or in combination with chemotherapy is well tolerated by these patients. Pediatric donors may be used for allogeneic transplantation with no higher incidence of complications. PBPC collection even in the smallest children is a safe and efficient procedure when performed by experienced apheresis teams.

Stem cell mobilisation with 16 microg/kg vs 10 microg/kg of G-CSF for allogeneic transplantation in healthy donors

We compared two doses of recombinant human granulocyte-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilisation in 90 healthy donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a retrospective analysis. Group I (n = 46) received 10 microg/kg G-CSF (filgrastim) given as 5 microg/kg twice daily, and group II (n = 44) received 16 microg/kg, given as 8 microg/kg twice daily with a 12-h interval. The groups were well-balanced for age and body-weight. G-CSF application was performed on an out-patient basis, and leukapheresis was started in all donors on day 5. The most frequent side-effects of G-CSF were grade I/II, bone pain, headache and fatigue in both groups, whereas grade III of bone pain, headache and fatigue occurred in the 2 x 8 microg/kg group only. One serious non-fatal event with non-traumatic spleen rupture occurred in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group. The CD34(+)cell count in the first apheresis of all donors was 5.1 x 10(6)/kg donor weight (range, 1.5-19.3). The CD34(+) cell harvest was higher in the 2 x 8 microg/kg group than in the 2 x 5 microg/kg group (7.1 x 10(6)/kg vs 4.9 x 10(6)/kg; P = 0.09). The target of collecting >5.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg donor weight with one apheresis procedure was achieved in 45% of group I and in 61% of group II, respectively. Administering G-CSF at a dosage of 8 microg/kg twice daily leads to a higher CD34(+) cell yield than a dosage of 2 x 5 microg/kg, but is associated with increased toxicity and higher cost.

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF): a randomized evaluation of different doses of rhG-CSF

To date, no randomized study has compared different doses of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) following submyeloablative mobilization chemotherapy. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of different doses of rhG-CSF following mobilization chemotherapy on yields of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Fifty patients were randomized to receive 8 (n = 25) versus 16 microg/kg/d (n = 25) of rhG-CSF following mobilization chemotherapy. The median number of CD34+ cells collected after 8 microg/kg/d of rhG-CSF was 2.36 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.21-7.80), compared with 7.99 (2.76-14.89) after 16 microg/kg/d (P < 0.001). Twenty out of 25 (80%) patients in the low-dose and 23 out of 25 (92%) in the high-dose rhG-CSF arm underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Median days to white blood cell engraftment in patients mobilized with 8 microg/kg and 16 microg/kg of rhG-CSF were 12 (10-20) and 9 (8-11) respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups regarding the other parameters of peritransplant morbidity: days to platelet engraftment (P = 0.10), number of red blood cell (P = 0.56) and platelet transfusions (P = 0.22), days of total parenteral nutrition requirement (P = 0.84), fever (P = 0.93) and antibiotics (P = 0.77), and number of different antibiotics used (P = 0.58). These data showed that higher doses of rhG-CSF following submyeloablative mobilization chemotherapy were associated with a clear dose-response effect based on the collected cell yields. Based on the parameters of peritransplant morbidity, 8 microg/kg/d was as effective as 16 microg/kg/d except for a rapid neutrophil engraftment in the high-dose arm. Therefore, in routine clinical practice, despite some advantage in the use of higher doses of rhG-CSF, lower doses may be used for PBSC collections following chemotherapy-based mobilization regimens in this cost-conscious era.

Economic evaluation of filgrastim, sargramostim, and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy

Filgrastim alone and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim have been shown to be more effective than sargramostim alone in the mobilization of CD34(+) cells after myelosuppressive chemotherapy (MC). We sought to compare costs and resource use associated with these regimens. Data were collected prospectively alongside a multicenter, randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim. Direct medical costs were calculated for inpatient and outpatient visits and procedures, including administration of growth factors and MC. We followed 156 patients for 30 days or until initiation of high-dose chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were resource use and costs of inpatient and outpatient visits, platelet and red blood cell transfusions, antibiotic use, and apheresis procedures. Hospital admissions, red blood cell transfusions, and use of i.v. antibiotics were significantly more common in the sargramostim group than in the other treatment arms. In univariate and multivariable analyses, total costs were higher for patients receiving sargramostim alone than for patients in the other groups. Mean costs in multivariable analysis for the filgrastim and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim arms were not significantly different. Filgrastim alone and sequential sargramostim and filgrastim are less costly than sargramostim alone after MC, as well as therapeutically more beneficial.

G-CSF Primed Autologous Marrow Harvest and Transplantation in Cytapheresis "Mobilization Failure" Patients: A Descriptive Analysis; Bone Marrow Transplantation

Fifteen cancer patients, deemed blood HSC "mobilization failures" due to CD34 + cell yields of < 0.5 x 10(6) /kg from two consecutive daily cytaphereses, underwent G-CSF primed autologous bone marrow harvest in an attempt to obtain adequate hematopoietic support for subsequent autotransplantation. CD34 + cell yields from the primed marrow harvest were variable; however, some patients had > 5-fold increases in CD34 + cell yields in the marrow compared to cytapheresis, and 4 patients had CD34 + cell yields of > 1.0 (i.e., 1.2, 1.44, 1.61 and 2.45) x 10(6) /kg from the primed marrow harvest. None of the five patients previously exposed to stem cell toxins or fludarabine achieved > 0.85 x 10(6) /kg CD34 + cells with the primed marrow harvest. A significant difference was noted between G-CSF primed blood and marrow for CD34 + cells but not for GM-CFU ( p = 0.011 and p = 0.135, respectively, paired t-test). All evaluable patients engrafted; a median ANC > 0.5 x 10(9) /L recovery was achieved on D + 12 (range + 9 to + 17) in 12 of 13 evaluable patients - one died on D + 9 without recovery. The last day of platelet transfusion occurred at a median D + 13 (range + 8 to > + 66); only one patient remained platelet transfusion-dependent beyond D + 34. As anticipated, patients with higher numbers of CD34 + cells transplanted had somewhat more rapid recoveries. Although stem cell damage is obviously a key factor in mobilization failure patients, these findings raise the possibility that poor mobilization, at least in some patients, results from a mechanism other than, or in addition to, simple stem cell damage. Moreover, they raise the issue of the minimum number of marrow CD34 + - or more arguably other - cells needed for adequate short- and long-term reconstitution. The role of G-CSF in this situation, especially regarding dose and/or schedule, is intriguing but remains to be clarified. G-CSF primed marrow harvest is a potential option in certain poor mobilizers but, as fully expected, is frequently inadequate. Whether such is preferable to "steady-state" marrow harvest, continued or repeated G-CSF primed cytapheresis (with or without chemotherapy), or primed marrow with G-CSF in other schedules - or with other cytokines - is unclear and will be the subject of further study.

High-Dose Chemotherapy with Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Support for Operable Locally Advanced Noninflammatory Carcinoma of the Breast

The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes for patients with operable noninflammatory stage IIIA/B locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) with positive axillary lymph nodes receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. One hundred fifteen patients with LABC who were no evidence of disease (NED) after initial surgery received standard dose induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy for mobilization of PBSC, and high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with PBSC support for adjuvant therapy. Following hematopoietic recovery, all patients were scheduled to receive radiation therapy and tamoxifen was administered if the primary tumor was estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive. Eighty-eight percent of patients were admitted to the hospital following HDC for a median of 11 days (range 3-26) and 12% were treated entirely as outpatients. There was one treatment-related death (0.9%) from infection occurring on day 8 after HDC. Forty-four (38%) have relapsed at a median of 20 months (range 10-55) from diagnosis, 11 (10%) with local-regional and 33 (28%) with metastatic disease. The probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for all 115 patients at 3 years were 0.73 and 0.61, respectively, with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10-89) from diagnosis. In univariate and multivariate analyses, no factors could be identified that were statistically predictive for OS or EFS. However, there were trends for patients with ER/PR-negative primary tumors to have worse OS (p = 0.16) and EFS (p = 0.10) than patients with ER/PR-positive tumors. This adjuvant combined modality strategy incorporating HDC is safe and compares favorably to historical studies of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for LABC. Further attempts to improve outcomes of patients with LABC receiving HDC are warranted.