Complete remission rate and outcome after intensive treatment of 177 patients under 75 years of age with IgG myeloma defining a circumscribed disease entity with a new staging system

Overview of drug therapy for multiple myeloma

Background. Multiple myeloma accounts for 10% of all haematologic malignancies worldwide. In Europe, over 10 000 new cases and nearly 8000 deaths were attributed to multiple myeloma in 2000. Unlike other malignancies, in which surgery and radiation are important treatment modalities, myeloma is exclusively treated with stem cell transplantation and drug therapy, requiring pharmacists to stay abreast of new developments. The melphalan-prednisolone and vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD) regimens, which have been standard treatments for multiple myeloma over the past few decades, have yielded responses without real survival benefits. Transplantation utilizing high-dose chemotherapy has produced the only meaningful survival benefits for patients with multiple myeloma, but many patients are not candidates for this aggressive treatment option. More effective therapies for multiple myeloma are needed.

Objective. To address the mechanisms of action, safety, and efficacy of novel approaches to the treatment of myeloma involving bortezomib, thalidomide and its analogues, lenalidomide and CC-4047 (ActimidTM), and arsenic trioxide as single agents or in combination regimens.

Data sources. Published preclinical and primary clinical trial results, as well as scientific or clinical meeting abstracts. The author determined the relevance and subsequent inclusion of the data.

Conclusions. Bortezomib is approved in the US and Europe as single-agent therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Thalidomide, its analogues, and arsenic trioxide have demonstrated activity and are under investigation in this disease. Further clinical trials of the efficacy and toxicity of these novel agents are ongoing and will further define optimal combinations and sequencing with conventional therapies.

Post-transplant outcomes of induction therapy for myeloma: thalidomide and dexamethasone versus doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone prior to high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support

High-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support improves survival as part of initial therapy for myeloma. Previous studies of pre-transplant induction regimens have compared paraprotein response rates but not long-term outcomes after transplant. We reviewed the records of all patients with multiple myeloma who received an autologous stem cell transplant at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center. We compared outcomes for 69 patients who received high-dose melphalan conditioning after January 1, 2003 as part of initial therapy for myeloma, including 41 patients who received anthracycline-based induction (VAD or DVD) and 28 patients who received thalidomide and dexamethasone induction. Baseline characteristics in these two groups were not different, though potentially clinically important differences were apparent in assignment to post-transplant consolidation and maintenance therapy. Despite similar response rates during induction therapy, thalidomide and dexamethasone induction was associated with better progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.18, P = 0.011) after transplant. This effect persisted in multivariable regression models including baseline characteristics and post-transplant treatment. Overall survival was not different between the two groups. These results suggest that the use of thalidomide during induction therapy may lead to improved long-term outcomes after transplant. Future trials comparing induction therapies should examine progression-free and overall survival after transplant to confirm this benefit.

The evolving background for high-dose treatment for myeloma

In the constantly evolving field of myeloma, this special issue is slanted towards how the newer targeted treatments fit in with various transplantation strategies. High-dose treatment for myeloma with autologous stem cell transplantation started 25 years ago, with the consequence of producing complete remissions and a doubling of survival. Since then, its role has been refined and it has been accepted as standard treatment. The current challenge is to optimize its use into a background of the development, availability and regulatory approval of newer targeted therapies such as Thalidomide, Revlimid (Lenalidomide) and Velcade (Bortezomib). This special issue addresses these problems, and gives particular emphasis on the attainment of very long-term survival, with normal quality of life for patients with myeloma who do not necessarily need to be cured of their molecular disease, that is, they are 'operationally cured.' It is hoped that the reader will find the information in this issue useful in the day-to-day management of patients and we hope that this will also inspire new research directions designed to improve the outcome of patients with myeloma.

Effects of paraprotein heavy and light chain types and free light chain load on survival in myeloma: an analysis of patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy in Medical Research Council UK multiple myeloma trials

While investigating 2592 patients enrolled in multicenter myeloma trials, we found light chain–only (LCO) patients had worse median survival times (1.9 years) than patients with IgA and IgG paraproteins (2.3 and 2.5 years, respectively) (P < .001). However, IgA and IgG patients with levels of LC excretion similar to those of LCO patients also had poor survival times because of renal failure, resulting in worse survival during induction therapy and at relapse with no difference in progression-free survival between LCO and IgG patients. LC excretion was higher for λ than for κ types, but there was no difference in survival between the 2 LC types when stratified for level of LC excretion, indicating that care of renal function is vital to improving the survival of any patient with LC excretion. LCO patients were younger (P = .001), had worse performance status (P = .001), and had more lytic lesions (P < .001), perhaps reflecting late and missed diagnoses in younger and older LCO patients, respectively. No differences were observed between IgA and IgG patients in presentation characteristics, response, or survival from disease progression. The worse survival of IgA patients was attributed to shorter progression-free survival (median, 1.2 vs 1.6 years; P < .001), which is important for maintenance therapy.

Complete response in multiple myeloma: clinical trial E9486, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study not involving stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The importance of obtaining a complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) treated with chemotherapy is unclear.

METHODS

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group evaluated 653 previously untreated patients with active MM randomized to vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP), to VBMCP and recombinant interferon alfa-2 (INFalpha-2), or to VBMCP and high-dose cyclophosphamide.

RESULTS

Objective response was achieved in 420 (67%) of the 628 eligible patients, and 85 (14%) achieved a CR. Patients receiving VBMCP and recombinant INFalpha-2 had a significantly higher CR (18%) than those receiving VBMCP alone (10%) (P = .02). The CR rate for VBMCP and high-dose cyclophosphamide was 12%. Median duration of survival was 3.5 years for all eligible patients, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 31%. The median duration of survival from the date of objective response was 5.1 years for those who achieved a CR and 3.3 years for those with a partial response (P < .0001). The median postresponse survival was 6.6 years in the 21 patients in CR with nonclonal disease and 4.4 years in the 11 patients in CR who had persistent clonal disease. All patients with negative immunofixation results and nonclonal plasma cells in whom polymerase chain reaction was performed had a positive result (presence of tumor DNA).

CONCLUSION

Patients in whom a CR was achieved had a longer survival than those who had a partial response.

High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Blood Stem-Cell Transplantation Compared With Conventional Treatment in Myeloma Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Control Trial From the Group Myelome-Autogreffe

Purpose

To study the impact of high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem-cell support in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) between the ages of 55 and 65 years.

Patients and Methods

One hundred ninety patients between 55 and 65 years old who had newly diagnosed stage II or III MM were randomly assigned to receive either conventional chemotherapy (CCT; ie, monthly courses of a regimen of vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone) or HDT and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (using either melphalan alone 200 mg/m2 intravenous [IV] or melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV plus busulfan 16 mg/kg orally as pretransplantation cytoreduction).

Results

Within a median follow-up of 120 months, median event-free survival (EFS) times were 25 and 19 months in the HDT and CCT groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) time was 47.8 months in the HDT group compared with 47.6 months in the CCT group. A trend to better EFS (P = .07) was observed in favor of HDT, whereas OS curves were not statistically different (P = .91). The period of time without symptoms, treatment, and treatment toxicity (TwiSTT) was significantly longer for the HDT patients than for the CCT patients (P = .03).

Conclusion

With a median follow-up time of approximately 10 years, this randomized trial confirmed a benefit of HDT in terms of EFS and TwiSTT but did not provide evidence for superiority of HDT over CCT in OS of patients aged 55 to 65 years with symptomatic newly diagnosed MM.

An elective single autograft with high-dose melphalan: single-center study of 451 patients

In all, 451 myeloma patients, 51% previously untreated, underwent elective single autotransplantation after 200 mg/m(2) melphalan between 1985 and 2001 at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The therapy sequence was: Induction (vincristine, doxorubicin, methylprednisolone+/-cyclophosphamide), marrow or filgrastim-mobilized blood stem cell harvest, autograft, and interferon-alpha2b maintenance. A total of 27 (6%) died of transplant-related toxicity, all within 3 months. Complete or near-complete remission was seen in 59% with an overall response rate of 91%. Subsequent disease progression was seen in 285, and 17 died of unrelated causes. In all, 206 patients were alive at the last follow-up, 6 months to 17.7 years post-transplant (median 65 months); 122 without disease progression at 6 months to 17.7 years (median 58 months). The median overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survivals were 5.9 and 2.4 years, with 10-year OS and EFS probabilities of 31.4 and 16.5%, respectively. In Cox analysis, it was seen that significantly longer OS occurred for patients who had beta-2-microglobulin <3.5 mg/l (P<0.0001), age <60 years (P=0.001) and albumin > or =35 g/l (P=0.009). EFS was also longer if beta-2-microglobulin was <3.5 mg/l (P=0.0056) and patients were <60 years of age (P=0.033). We conclude that with a single planned autograft, patients with myeloma have an excellent outcome.

A randomized study (WOS MM1) comparing the oral regime Z-Dex (idarubicin and dexamethasone) with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma

Whilst infusional vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) is an effective treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), administration may be complicated by line-associated infections and thromboses. The oral regime, Z-Dex (idarubicin and dexamethasone) has been shown to be efficacious in MM. We conducted a randomized study comparing Z-Dex with VAD as induction therapy in newly diagnosed MM patients. A total of 106 patients (median age, 56 years; range: 37-73; Durie-Salmon stage II/III) were randomized to receive four to six cycles of Z-Dex or VAD. Central line complications were reported in 38 patients on 57 cycles, primarily because of infection. Neutropenia (all grades) was more common in the Z-Dex arm (P = 0.009) although grade III/IV neutropenia was not significantly different between the treatment groups (P = 0.06). Infections (all grades) were more commonly seen in the VAD arm (P = 0.001) although grade III/IV infections were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.081). The responses to therapy (complete/partial response) in evaluable patients were: VAD 74% vs. Z-Dex 58%, with an estimated difference in response of 16% (95% CI -2-33, P = 0.075). VAD recipients (15%) suffered early treatment-related mortality compared with 12% of Z-Dex recipients. Overall, 45 patients have died: disease progression (Z-Dex n = 13, VAD n = 10), regimen-related toxicity (Z-Dex n = 2, VAD n = 2), infection (Z-Dex n = 0, VAD n = 3), other causes (Z-Dex n = 7, VAD n = 2), unknown (Z-Dex n = 3, VAD n = 2). This study demonstrated that Z-Dex might be a suitable oral alternative to VAD for treating newly diagnosed MM patients, although definitive evidence for equivalence is not provided.

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a malignant disease of plasma cells that manifests as one or more of lytic bone lesions, monoclonal protein in the blood or urine, and disease in the bone marrow. Treatment for myeloma has changed beyond recognition in the past decade, and now includes state of the art supportive treatment and infusional chemotherapy courses, followed for younger patients by high-dose melphalan and an autologous transplant. Patients younger than 70 years can now expect a doubling of median survival to 5 years, a 20% chance of surviving longer than 10 years, and a 50% chance of attaining complete morphological and biochemical remission. Bisphosphonate control of bone disease is essential. Exploitation of the understanding of the biology of myeloma has led to the development of biological treatments, such as thalidomide, CC-5013, and bortezomib, which target the myeloma cell and the bone-marrow microenvironment, which plays a crucial part in the disease's pathogenesis. These treatments will hold the key to future success.

DTPACE: an effective, novel combination chemotherapy with thalidomide for previously treated patients with myeloma

PURPOSE

To improve outcome in previously treated patients (at least two cycles of standard therapy) with multiple myeloma, thalidomide was combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy as induction therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The regimen consisted of 4-days of oral dexamethasone, daily thalidomide, and 4 days of continuous-infusion cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (DTPACE). Response to two cycles of DTPACE for induction was evaluated in 236 patients. Before being treated with DTPACE, 148 patients (63%) had shown progressive disease while receiving standard chemotherapy, and 55 patients (23%) had chromosome 13 abnormalities.

RESULTS

The partial remission rate (PR) after two cycles of DTPACE was 32%, with 16% attaining a complete remission (CR) or near-CR (nCR; defined as only immunofixation electrophoresis-positive). Patients with high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; n = 98) showed a better response than those with normal LDH (n = 138): PR or better, 43% v 27% (P =.01); CR + nCR, 25% v 11% (P =.01). Patients with chromosome 13 abnormalities (n = 55) responded equally well as the other patients (n = 181): PR or better, 35% v 33% (P =.84); CR + nCR, 17% v 15% (P =.73). Patients who received 100% dose of DTPACE for two cycles (n = 115) achieved higher response rates than those with less than 100% dose (n = 121): PR or better, 49% v 17% (P <.0001); CR + nCR, 27% v 6% (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of oral dexamethasone and thalidomide with infusional chemotherapy is effective as induction therapy before autotransplantation, especially in patients with high-risk features.

Response to induction chemotherapy is not essential to obtain survival benefit from high-dose melphalan and autotransplantation in myeloma

Two hundred and twenty-two myeloma patients autografted after 200 mg/m(2)melphalan were studied to examine the relationship between response to induction chemotherapy and outcome. Induction comprised cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and methylprednisolone (C-VAMP) every 3 weeks for one cycle beyond maximum response. 81% responded to C-VAMP (chemosensitive) with 40 complete (CR) and 139 partial (PR) remissions, and 43 did not respond (NR; <50% reduction in paraprotein; primary refractory). Overall, 130 patients (59%) attained or remained in CR post-transplant; including 40% of NR, 53% of PR, and 97% of CR after C-VAMP (P < 0.0001). Amongst these 130 patients, the 5-year OS was independent of response to C-VAMP (NR 79%, PR 74%, CR 60%; P = 0.69). Similarly, among the 69 patients in PR post-transplant, the 5-year OS was independent of response to C-VAMP. In Cox analysis, lack of response to C-VAMP did not affect outcome significantly. These data show that lack of response to induction therapy does not automatically predict poor long-term outcome in myeloma, since a substantial proportion of these patients attain CR after autograft and enjoy extended survival. Myeloma patients should not be disqualified from an autograft based upon lack of response to induction chemotherapy.

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells in newly diagnosed myeloma patients without any prior cytoreductive therapy: the first step towards an 'operational cure'?

We have shown that primary therapy with non-myeloablative (140 mg/m(2)) high-dose melphalan (HDM) without hematopoietic support results in high response rates in untreated myeloma and very long-term survival of some patients. This study was designed to see if sufficient CD34 (+) cells can be harvested at presentation in newly diagnosed patients to administer myeloablative HDM (200 mg/m(2); HDM200) with autograft as primary therapy. This may improve outcome by rapid achievement of complete remission (CR) and possible avoidance of late myelodysplasia as a consequence of non-transplant induction chemotherapy. Thirty untreated patients received 1 g/m(2) methylprednisolone daily (days 1-6) and 12-16 micro g/kg G-CSF daily (days 3-6), and underwent leukapheresis on days 6 and 7. The median CD34(+) cell yield was 1.31 x10(6)/kg (range, 0.23-5.63), and was > or =1 x10(6)/kg in 73%. Cell yields were significantly lower than in 82 historical controls apheresed after completion of induction chemotherapy (median 2.16 x 10(6)/kg), and improved in patients who were apheresed again after induction chemotherapy. Three patients received primary therapy with HDM200 and autograft using these cells and attained CR. We conclude that it is possible to harvest stem cells in three-quarters of untreated myeloma patients. Increasing the number of apheresis procedures is needed to improve the number of CD34(+) cells collected.

Dose escalation therapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma following Z-Dex induction treatment

A phase I-II study of high-dose (HD) alkylating agents in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma after maximum response to Z-Dex (idarubicin, dexamethasone) therapy and DHAP (cisplatin, HD cytosine arabinoside, dexamethasone), stem cell mobilization is reported. Twenty-six patients, median age 56 years (range 42-66), completed Z-Dex chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized with DHAP. Patients then preceded to cyclophosphamide (HD Cy: 6 g/m(2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor followed by busulphan-melphalan-conditioned PBSC autograft. Interferon alpha was introduced at 3 months post transplant as maintenance therapy. Six patients failed to complete the full protocol. Median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 8 months (range 6-12). Mean CD34+ cell dose collected was 15.8 x 10(6)/kg (CI 11.8, 19.8). Median time from DHAP to HD-Cy was 6 weeks (range 4-12) and from HD-Cy to transplant was 8 weeks (range 6-12). The median follow-up was 36 months (range 6-63). On an intent-to-treat basis, the response rates were three complete response (CR, 12%), 21 partial response (PR, 80%) and two stable disease (SD, 8%) post Z-Dex, five CR (19%) and 21 PR (81%) post HD-Cy, and 14 CR (54%) and 12 PR (46%) post transplant. The treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 4% (1 patient). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) have not been reached; estimated values were 60 and 48 months respectively. The 3-year OS and PFS were 72% and 62%. Actuarial 5-year OS and event-free survival were 49% and 32%. DHAP produces effective PBSC mobilization and sequential HD therapy, including autologous PBSCT, in patients who received Z-Dex; this offers significant durable disease response rates with acceptable TRM.

Update on the treatment of multiple myeloma

The patient with multiple myeloma should be carefully evaluated from the standpoint of symptoms, physical findings, and laboratory data. If there are no symptoms or evidence of early or impending complications, the patient should not be treated. He or she should be followed and treatment delayed until progression of the disease occurs. If the patient is younger than 70 years, autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation should be considered. Hematopoietic stem cells should be collected before the patient is exposed to alkylating agents. If the patient is older than 70 years, chemotherapy is indicated. The two major shortcomings of autologous stem cell transplantation are: A) failure to eradicate myeloma, and B) contamination of autologous peripheral blood stem cells. Most physicians initially treat the patient with vincristine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and dexamethasone (VAD) for three to four months and then collect the peripheral blood stem cells. One can then proceed with transplant or treat the patient with alkylating agents and delay the transplant until the patient progresses. In a prospective trial comparing autologous bone marrow transplantation with conventional chemotherapy, five-year overall survival favored the transplant group (52% versus 12%). In a randomized trial of 400 patients from France, there was no difference in event-free or overall survival between double and single autologous stem cell transplant when evaluated at two years. In a subsequent evaluation, patients with a low beta(2)-microglobulin value at diagnosis appeared to have better results with a double transplant. There is no evidence that combinations of chemotherapeutic agents are more effective than melphalan and prednisone. Allogeneic transplantation is associated with a high mortality. Depletion of T-cells or a mini-allogeneic transplant may be beneficial in an effort to reduce mortality. Thalidomide produces objective response in approximately 30% of refractory patients. The use of intravenous bisphosphonates is recommended for patients with skeletal lesions. Hypercalcemia and renal failure must be treated promptly.

Some early phase II trials in previously untreated multiple myeloma: The Royal Marsden experience

Multiple myeloma is at a stage today where acute leukemia was in the 1960s and 1970s when the aim was to attain complete remission (CR), which would translate into prolonged overall survival (OS) and a cure. The Royal Marsden group was the first to establish a dose-response effect for melphalan leading to CR in patients with myeloma. Since then, different strategies have been developed to improve the results of high-dose therapy, including alternating conditioning regimens, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as a source of stem cells, purging techniques to decrease graft contamination by the myeloma cell, increased dose intensity by means of tandem transplants, and finally, allogeneic matched or unmatched stem cell transplantation. Components of treatment offered at Royal Marsden since 1980 are upfront high-dose melphalan (HDM) 140 mg/m(2), induction infusional chemotherapy followed by consolidation with HDM with autotransplantation, and maintenance with interferon-alpha2b (IFN) (collectively termed sequential therapy). Each of these components has shown benefits in selected studies and together they have dramatically improved the outlook for patients with myeloma.

Comparison of new patients with Bence-Jones, IgG and IgA myeloma receiving sequential therapy: the need to regard these immunologic subtypes as separate disease entities with specific prognostic criteria

Of the 61 newly diagnosed patients with Bence-Jones (BJ) myeloma presenting to our centre between May 1986 and December 1997, 53 received sequential therapy (ST) comprising infusional chemotherapy (IC) followed by high-dose therapy and autotransplantation with interferon-alpha2b maintenance. The outcome was compared with 153 IgG and 39 IgA similarly treated myeloma patients. Response to IC and high-dose was comparable between the three subtypes but a significantly higher proportion of patients with BJ myeloma failed to receive high-dose compared to IgG (P = 0.003) and IgA (P = 0.04) myeloma. Median overall survival (OS) of patients with BJ myeloma (2.8 years) and event-free survival (EFS, 1.2 years) was significantly shorter than for patients with IgG myeloma (4.5 years, P = 0.03 and 2.1 years, P = 0.03, respectively). However, among those patients who achieved complete remission there was no difference in OS and EFS between IgG and BJ myeloma. In distinction to IgG myeloma where age and beta2M were significant, Cox analysis on presentation features identified performance status and urine total protein as having significant impact on OS. We conclude that achieving CR is an important treatment aim in patients with BJ myeloma, conferring a similar outlook on survival as in patients with the IgG subtype, and there is a need to consider different subtype-specific staging systems when evaluating the results of published or ongoing therapeutic trials.

High-dose therapy autotransplantation/intensification vs continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma in first remission. Results of a non-randomized study from a single institution

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) responding to initial chemotherapy who received intensification with high-dose therapy/autotransplantation (HDT) as compared to that of those who were continued on standard chemotherapy. From 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1998, 64 patients with MM who were younger than 65 years achieved a response to initial chemotherapy. Due to referral reasons, patients preference or inclusion in trials, 31 patients received HDT as early intensification while 33 were continued on standard chemotherapy. The presenting features were similar in both groups, except for the median age, which was lower in the HDT group (53 vs 58 years, P = 0.007). Complete response negative immunofixation - (CR) was achieved in 12 of 31 (39%) patients intensified with HDT and in two of 33 (6%) patients who were continued on conventional chemotherapy (P = 0.002). Event-free survival (EFS) was significantly longer in the HDT group (median, 43 vs 21 months; P = 0.007). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between groups (median, 62 vs 38 months; P = 0.21). However, patients in the HDT group who achieved CR had an EFS (median, 51 vs 31 months; P = 0.03) as well as an OS (median, not reached vs 50 months; P = 0.0006) significantly longer than those achieving a lower degree of response. In conclusion, this non-randomized study shows that early HDT increases CR rate and prolongs EFS. In addition, these results highlight CR as a crucial step for achieving long-lasting disease control and prolonged survival in patients with MM.

Multiple Myeloma: New Insights and Therapeutic Approaches

This review discusses the evolution of novel diagnostic and treatment strategies for multiple myeloma based upon increased understanding of basic disease pathogenesis. Although myeloma has remained an incurable illness to date, these new developments will derive treatments to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

In Section I, Dr. Kyle reviews the results of current therapy for multiple myeloma, including high dose therapy and stem cell transplantation which have proven to achieve improved response rates, event-free, and overall survival. Supportive therapy, such as erythropoietin to treat disease-related anemia, and methods of prophylaxis against infection, which both lessen toxicities of treatment and improve quality of life for patients, are also addressed.

In Section II, Dr. Dalton with Drs. Landowski, Shain, Jove and Hazlehurst discusses mechanisms of drug resistance in myeloma, with emphasis on novel treatment approaches to prevent development of drug resistance and to overcome drug resistance. Laboratory studies delineating mechanisms whereby myeloma cells resist drug-induced apoptosis provide the framework for related treatment protocols for patients with refractory disease.

In Section III, Dr. Berenson reviews the management of complications in bone, which occur in the majority of patients with myeloma and are the major cause of decreased quality of life. New insights into the mediators of bone resorption and new bone formation in the marrow milieu have already derived effective bisphosphonate therapy. These drugs not only reduce bone complications and related pain, thereby improving quality of life, but also may have intrinsic anti-tumor activity by virtue of inducing tumor cell adherence to marrow, reducing interleukin-6 secretion, inducing tumor cell apoptosis, or inhibiting angiogenesis.

In the last section, Dr. Anderson explores the potential for future therapies which offer great promise to improve patient outcomes. First, drugs which alter the marrow microenvironment include thalidomide and its derivative immunomodulatory drugs, which act directly on tumor cells to induce apoptosis or G1 growth arrest, alter tumor cell adhesion to marrow stroma, inhibit angiogenesis, and trigger a cellular anti-tumor response. The proteasome inhibitors both act directly on tumor cells and also inhibit the transcription factor NFκB-dependent upregulation of IL-6 secretion triggered by tumor cell adhesion. Second, delineation of both growth and apoptotic pathways has derived novel treatment strategies. Third, the preclinical basis and early clinical trial results using vaccination and adoptive immunotherapy to harness autoimmune and alloimmune anti-myeloma responses are presented. This review sets the stage for an evolving new biologically based treatment paradigm in myeloma targeting both the tumor and its microenvironment to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

Multiple Myeloma: New Insights and Therapeutic Approaches

This review discusses the evolution of novel diagnostic and treatment strategies for multiple myeloma based upon increased understanding of basic disease pathogenesis. Although myeloma has remained an incurable illness to date, these new developments will derive treatments to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.

In Section I, Dr. Kyle reviews the results of current therapy for multiple myeloma, including high dose therapy and stem cell transplantation which have proven to achieve improved response rates, event-free, and overall survival. Supportive therapy, such as erythropoietin to treat disease-related anemia, and methods of prophylaxis against infection, which both lessen toxicities of treatment and improve quality of life for patients, are also addressed.

In Section II, Dr. Dalton with Drs. Landowski, Shain, Jove and Hazlehurst discusses mechanisms of drug resistance in myeloma, with emphasis on novel treatment approaches to prevent development of drug resistance and to overcome drug resistance. Laboratory studies delineating mechanisms whereby myeloma cells resist drug-induced apoptosis provide the framework for related treatment protocols for patients with refractory disease.

In Section III, Dr. Berenson reviews the management of complications in bone, which occur in the majority of patients with myeloma and are the major cause of decreased quality of life. New insights into the mediators of bone resorption and new bone formation in the marrow milieu have already derived effective bisphosphonate therapy. These drugs not only reduce bone complications and related pain, thereby improving quality of life, but also may have intrinsic anti-tumor activity by virtue of inducing tumor cell adherence to marrow, reducing interleukin-6 secretion, inducing tumor cell apoptosis, or inhibiting angiogenesis.

In the last section, Dr. Anderson explores the potential for future therapies which offer great promise to improve patient outcomes. First, drugs which alter the marrow microenvironment include thalidomide and its derivative immunomodulatory drugs, which act directly on tumor cells to induce apoptosis or G1 growth arrest, alter tumor cell adhesion to marrow stroma, inhibit angiogenesis, and trigger a cellular anti-tumor response. The proteasome inhibitors both act directly on tumor cells and also inhibit the transcription factor NFκB-dependent upregulation of IL-6 secretion triggered by tumor cell adhesion. Second, delineation of both growth and apoptotic pathways has derived novel treatment strategies. Third, the preclinical basis and early clinical trial results using vaccination and adoptive immunotherapy to harness autoimmune and alloimmune anti-myeloma responses are presented. This review sets the stage for an evolving new biologically based treatment paradigm in myeloma targeting both the tumor and its microenvironment to improve outcome and achieve eventual cure.