The importance of locally derived reference ranges and standardized calculation of dilute Russell's viper venom time results in screening for lupus anticoagulant

The effect of DOAC-Stop on lupus anticoagulant testing in plasma samples of venous thromboembolism patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) cause false positive lupus anticoagulant (LA) results. We assessed the impact of DOAC-Stop, reversing in vitro effects of DOACs, on LA testing in anticoagulated patients.

Methods

We assessed 75 venous thromboembolism patients aged 44.5±14.6 years. Blood samples were collected 2–28 h since intake of DOACs, including 50 patients on rivaroxaban, 20 on dabigatran and five on apixaban. LA testing was performed at baseline and after DOAC-Stop treatment. Positive LA was defined as the normalized (patient/standard plasma clotting time) LA screening and screening (LA1)/confirmation (LA2) ratios exceeding 1.2.

Results

LA diluted Russell’s viper venom time (dRVVT) normalized screening test revealed abnormal results in 73 (97.3%) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-LA in 49 (65.3%) patients. In six (8%) patients, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was diagnosed. dRVVT LA1/LA2 was abnormal in 35 (50.7%) patients taking DOACs. The APTT ratio was normal in all studied subjects. DOAC-Stop completely removed dabigatran and reduced by 98% rivaroxaban and by 92.3% apixaban concentrations (all p<0.05). After DOAC-Stop screening dRVVT remained prolonged in 34 (49.3%) patients (p<0.001), while dRVVT LA1/LA2 was abnormal in six (8.7%) subjects, with no association with DOAC concentrations at baseline and after DOAC-Stop. The APTT-LA screening test remained prolonged in five (7.2%) patients, while the APTT LA1/LA2 ratio was normal in those subjects. DOAC-Stop did not influence LA testing in APS patients.

Conclusions

Application of DOAC-Stop effectively reduced plasma DOAC concentrations leading to appropriate dRVVT results in up to 97% of VTE patients.

Assessment of Normative Range and Deriving Cut-Off Values for Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing is a demanding laboratory test. The most common among recommended tests for LA are dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (LA-aPTT). Although integrated test systems come with manufacturer assigned cut-off, but according to guidelines cut-off should be locally-derived. This study was carried out to find normative range of LA using LA-aPTT and dRV VT tests in south Indian population (n = 100) and using locally derived cut-off values to interpret patient samples (n = 152) in a one-year study period. Cut-off (mean+2.3 SD) for aPTT, LA-aPTT, dRVVT screen and dRVVT confirm assays were 37.5, 45.7, 45.5 and 41.3 s and for normalized ratio and percentage correction of ratio were 1.16 and 15.8% respectively. Among patients, 25 (16.4%) were positive of whom 14 were positive by normalized ratio, seven by LA-aPTT and four were positive by both. Four additional patients could be identified using local cut-off. While the specificity of all screening tests was high, sensitivity of only dRVVT screen was high. All testing laboratories should attempt to derive normative range and locally-derived cut-off. While dRVVT is a good screening test with high sensitivity, however combining LA-aPTT offers advantage of picking up cases negative by dRVVT.

Newly developed dilute Russell's viper venom reagents for lupus anticoagulant detection with improved specificity

Background Dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) is indispensible in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection yet commercial reagents from different suppliers perform variably, no gold standard assays exist and therapeutic anticoagulation interference is problematic. Objective The objective of this study was to compare a new formulation dRVVT with two currently available dRVVTs. Materials and methods Life Diagnostics (LD) dRVVT and Stago PTT-LA were routinely used for lupus anticoagulant detection, plus Taipan snake venom time/ecarin time (TSVT/ET) for patients on warfarin or rivaroxaban. Siemens dRVVT and the new HYPHEN BioMed (HBM) dRVVT were tested with 193 patient samples. Group 1, 59 non-anticoagulated patients (NAPs) LA-positive in LD dRVVT; Group 2, 15 PTT-LA-positive/dRVVT-negative NAPs; Group 3, 24 LA-positive warfarinized patients; Group 4, 13 patients on rivaroxaban; Group 5, 62 LA-negative thrombotic NAPs; Group 6, 20 warfarinized, non-antiphospholipid syndrome patients. Results Accepting that the Life Diagnostics reagents were acting as a pseudo-gold standard, Siemens dRVVT detected 56/59, (95%) Group 1 LA and HBM dRVVT 46/59, (76%), one each from Group 2, and Siemens dRVVT detected one in Group 5. The lower HBM dRVVT detection rate mainly concerned weaker LA, where between-reagent concordance is problematic. All Group 3 patients appeared LA-positive in undiluted plasma with Siemens dRVVT, as did 16/24 (67%) with HBM dRVVT but the fewer LA-positives in mixing tests better mapped to clear LA-positives with LD dRVVT. LD and Siemens dRVVTs exhibited 87% and 95% false-positivity for Group 6 whilst HBM dRVVT had none. Increasing the cut-off improved accuracy. Applying higher cut-offs improved accuracy in Group 4 patients. Conclusion HBM dRVVT exhibited improved specificity, mainly due to less interference by anticoagulation, but reduced sensitivity, compared to the other dRVVTs employed.

Variability of cut-off values for the detection of lupus anticoagulants: results of an international multicenter multiplatform study

Essentials Between-lab variations of cut-off values in lupus anticoagulant detection are unknown. Cut-off values were calculated in 11 labs each testing plasma from 120 donors with 3 platforms. Major variation was observed even within the same platform. Cut-off values determined in different labs are not interchangeable.

SUMMARY

Background Cut-off values for interpretation of lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection are poorly investigated. Aims (i) To assess whether results from healthy donors were normally distributed and (ii) the between-laboratories differences in cut-off values for screening, mixing and LA confirmation when calculated as 99th or 95th centiles, and (iii) to assess their impact on the detection rate for LA. Methods Each of 11 laboratories using one of the three widely used commercial platforms for LA detection was asked to collect plasmas from 120 healthy donors and to perform screening, mixing and LA confirmation with two methods (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT] and dilute Russell viper venom [dRVV]). A common set of LA-positive or LA-negative freeze-dried plasmas was used to assess the LA detection rate. Results were centralized (Milano) for statistical analysis. Results and conclusions (i) Clotting times or ratios for healthy subjects were not normally distributed in the majority of cases. The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined preferably by the non-parametric method based on centiles. (ii) There were relatively large inter-laboratory cut-off variations even within the same platform and the variability was marginally attenuated when results were expressed as ratios (test-to-normal pooled plasma). The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined locally. (iii) There were differences between cut-off values calculated as 99th or 95th centiles that translate into a different LA detection rate (the lower the centile the greater the detection rate). The take-home message is that cut-off values determined as the 95th centile allow a better LA detection rate.

Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune, acquired thrombophilia diagnosed when vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity are accompanied by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are one of the criteria antibodies but calibration plasmas are unavailable and they are detected by inference based on antibody behaviour in a medley of coagulation-based assays. Elevated screening tests suggest the presence of a LA, which is confirmed with mixing tests to evidence inhibition and confirmatory tests to demonstrate phospholipid-dependence. At least two screening tests of different principle must be used to account for antibody heterogeneity and controversy exists on whether assays, in addition to dilute Russell's viper venom time and activated partial thromboplastin time, should be employed. A variety of approaches to raw data manipulation and interpretation attract debate, as does inclusion or exclusion of mixing studies in circumstances where the presence of a LA is already evident from other results. Therapeutic anticoagulation compromises coagulation-based assays but careful data interpretation and use of alternative reagents can detect or exclude LA in specific circumstances, and this aspect of LA detection continues to evolve. This review focuses on the main areas of debate in LA detection.

Impact of regional left ventricular function on outcome for patients with AL amyloidosis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to explore the left ventricular (LV) deformation changes and the potential impact of deformation on outcome in patients with proven light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and LV hypertrophy.

Background

Cardiac involvement in AL amyloidosis patients is associated with poor outcome. Detecting regional cardiac function by advanced non-invasive techniques might be favorable for predicting outcome.

Methods

LV longitudinal, circumferential and radial peak systolic strains (Ssys) were assessed by speckle tracking imaging (STI) in 44 biopsy-proven systemic AL amyloidosis patients with LV hypertrophy (CA) and in 30 normal controls. Patients were divided into compensated (n = 18) and decompensated (n = 26) group based on clinical assessment and followed-up for a median period of 345 days.

Results

Ejection fraction (EF) was preserved while longitudinal Ssys (LSsys) was significantly reduced in both compensated and decompensated groups. Survival was significantly reduced in decompensated group (35% vs. compensated 78%, P = 0.001). LSsys were similar in apical segments and significantly reduced in basal segments between two patient groups. LSsys at mid-segments were significantly reduced in all LV walls of decompensated group. Patients were further divided into 4 subgroups according to the presence or absence of reduced LSsys in no (normal), only basal (mild), basal and mid (intermediate) and all segments of the septum (severe). This staging revealed continuously worse prognosis in proportion to increasing number of segments with reduced LSsys (mortality: normal 14%, mild 27%, intermediate 67%, and severe 64%). Mid-septum LSsys<11% suggested a 4.8-fold mortality risk than mid-septum LSsys≥11%. Multivariate regression analysis showed NYHA class and mid-septum LSsys were independent predictors for survival.

Conclusions

Reduced deformation at mid-septum is associated with worse prognosis in systemic amyloidosis patients with LV hypertrophy.

Lupus anticoagulant testing: analyzing fresh samples after a single centrifugation and after a 6-8 h delay

BACKGROUND

For automation it is important to know the effect of analyzing fresh samples after a single rather than after two centrifugations, and to determine test stability.

METHODS

This study compared silica clotting times (SCT) and dilute Russel's viper venom tests (dRVVT) after one and two centrifugations in 50 fresh plasma samples. Then it compared test results within 4 h to those after 6-8 h of blood drawing in 40 samples. Means, minimums, maximums and quartiles of the paired screen were compared, test ratios were confirmed and correlations, linear regressions and Bland-Altman statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

The distributions of test results were nearly identical, regardless of the number of centrifugations or timing of the analysis. The first centrifugation explained 97.7% and 94.8% of the variance of tests results after the second centrifugation for the SCT and dRVVT, respectively. The test results after 6-8 h explained 98.3% and 96.3% of the variance of the SCT-ratios and dRVVT-ratios, respectively, tested within 4 h. Inter-day coefficients of correlation of ratio comparisons were similar to those of the controls values.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing of fresh samples after a single centrifugation might replace batch testing of frozen samples after double centrifugation, providing timelier reporting of results and resulting in savings of technician time.

Screening for lupus anticoagulant: improving the performance of the lupus-sensitive PTT-LA

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present work was to verify whether calculating a ratio between clotting times obtained with the sensitive PTT-LA and a less sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-reagent may represent a valuable aPTT-based screening strategy for lupus anticoagulants (LA).

METHODS

For the pilot study, plasma samples from normal subjects (n = 15) and from patients with LA (n = 10), therapeutic anticoagulation with vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) (n = 15) or unfractionated heparin (n = 15), coagulation factors deficiency (n = 16), and inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII or IX (n = 11) were studied. For the evaluation study, 1553 consecutive plasma samples from nonanticoagulated patients investigated for LA between January 2005 and December 2007 at our institution were studied. Following screening strategies were employed: Pathromtin-SL (aPTT-SL), PTT-LA (aPTT-LA), ratio aPTT-LA/aPTT-SL (aPTT-ratio), and Russell's viper venom (RVV) based LA-Check. LA positive samples were identified by mixing studies and diluted RVV confirmation test (LA-Check/LA-Sure).

RESULTS

Pilot study: All screening strategies had a 100% sensitivity, and the aPTT-ratio reached the highest specificity (82%; 95%CI: 74-90%). Within the evaluation study, following sensitivities for LA screening were observed: aPTT-SL 59.0% (95%CI: 57-61%), aPTT-LA 82.1% (95%CI: 80-84%), aPTT-ratio 92.3% (95%CI: 91-94), and LA-Check 83.3% (95%CI: 82-85%).

CONCLUSION

Calculating a ratio between the LA-sensitive PTT-LA and the less sensitive Pathromtin-SL improves the performance of the PTT-LA itself and represents a simple and sensitive aPTT-based integrated strategy for LA screening.

Antiphospholipid syndrome review

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder presenting with tissue injury in various organs attributed to large or small vessel thrombosis or, in some instances, possible nonthrombotic inflammatory mechanisms, associated with in vitro evidence of antibodies to certain proteins, or proteinphospholipid complexes. Although the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of APS may seem clear and straightforward from a distance, closer inspection reveals a more complex, incomplete, and uncertain image. This article reviews the evolution of APS from the first description of lupus anticoagulant to the current criteria used to guide clinical research, critiques laboratory methods used to identify autoantibodies, comments on prognosis and management, and summarizes insights into the pathophysiology of this elusive disorder.

Investigation of the cause of death in a gene-therapy trial

We present a case of disseminated histoplasmosis, complicated by retroperitoneal bleeding and leading to death, in a patient who was receiving systemic immunosuppressive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis and who was enrolled in a gene-therapy trial. This trial was designed to evaluate intraarticular delivery of a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonist, through an adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 delivery system, for inflammatory arthritis. The patient's receipt of concurrent anti-TNF-alpha therapy and other immunosuppressive therapy while she was living in an area where histoplasmosis was endemic was thought to be the most likely explanation for the infection; the evidence presented suggests that this fatal infection was unlikely to have been related to exposure to the agent administered in the gene-therapy trial. This case reinforces the importance of considering infectious complications, such as those from endemic mycoses, in patients receiving treatment with a TNF-alpha antagonist and the importance of having a well-designed monitoring plan when subjects in a research study become ill. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00126724.)

How we diagnose the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilia, characterized by the occurrence of venous and arterial events. This article examines the laboratory and key clinical aspects of APS. Particular focus is given to anti–beta 2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies in view of their recent inclusion in the APS classification criteria. The clinical utility of using the β2GPI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in conjunction with the established lupus anticoagulant assays and cardiolipin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, for diagnosing and risk stratifying patients suspected of having APS is discussed. The relative importance of the various assays in diagnosing obstetric APS (early and late gestation miscarriages) is explored. The implications of recent epidemiologic findings for possibly understanding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of obstetric APS are highlighted. Insights into which patients with obstetric APS may be at most risk of thrombotic complications are presented.

The Activated Seven Lupus Anticoagulant Assay Detects Clinically Significant Antibodies

Lupus anticoagulants are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies detected by their effects on phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays. Persistent lupus anticoagulants are associated with thrombotic disease, but not all are clinically significant. Antibody heterogeneity and reagent and test variability dictate that at least 2 tests, of different types, should be used to screen lupus anticoagulants. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies. Eighty-two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 32 with systemic lupus erythematosus + positive for activated seven lupus anticoagulant and who were without thrombosis, who were positive by activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, were investigated for lupus anticoagulants by dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, and Taipan snake venom time, and for anticardiolipin antibodies. Fifty-seven of the APS patients were positive for lupus anticoagulants in multiple assays, 25 in activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone. Fourteen of the latter group were previously positive in other antiphospholipid antibodies assays, and 11 had only been positive for lupus anticoagulants by activated seven lupus anticoagulant. Twenty-eight had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies, 6 of whom were from the group that was positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant only. Eight of the systemic lupus erythematosus + lupus anticoagulants (without thrombosis) patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant by activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone and had only been positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant previously, and none had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. The remaining 24 patients were lupus-anticoagulant positive in multiple assays, and 9 had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. Dilute Russell's viper venom time and Dilute activated partial thromboplastin time are widely used to detect lupus anticoagulants and are considered to detect clinically significant antibodies. Activated seven lupus anticoagulant detected antibodies in APS patients who were positive by these assays and also lupus anticoagulants undetectable by the dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute activated partial thromboplastin time reagents used, demonstrating its utility as a first-line or second-line assay.

Further evidence of false negative screening for lupus anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Accurate and timely detection of lupus anticoagulants (LA) is of diagnostic and prognostic importance due to the association of persistent LA with thrombotic disease. Antibody heterogeneity and assay variability complicate LA detection and weak antibodies can go undetected.

METHODS

Screen and confirm assays on equal volume mixing studies were performed on known LA using dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT), dilute activated partial thromboplastin time (DAPTT) and activated seven lupus anticoagulant (ASLA) assay. Two established calculations for phospholipid dependence were applied to ascertain whether any antibodies diluted to within screening test reference ranges maintained a significant difference between screen and confirm results sufficient to imply LA activity. We then performed confirmatory tests on neat plasma samples from patients with thrombotic disease whose screening tests were within reference ranges.

RESULTS

Forty nine of 155 DRVVT positive LA were conventionally positive in the mixing studies and 8 of the 106 negative mixing studies showed significant screen and confirm test discordance. This was the case for 21 of 56 negative DAPTT mixing studies and 2 of 39 negative ASLA mixing studies. Performance of confirm assays on the neat plasma samples with screen results within reference ranges revealed possible LA activity in 19 of 166 DRVVT results, 63 of 184 DAPTT results and 9 of 117 ASLA results.

CONCLUSIONS

LA activity can be demonstrated by assessment of screen and confirm data irrespective of screening test elevation above a reference range. Other workers have demonstrated this phenomenon in APTT using different study designs and it may be that standard interpretation criteria warrant re-assessment.

Laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulants: a review of issues affecting results

BACKGROUND

Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are a heterogeneous class of immunoglobulins. Persistent LA positivity is a risk factor for the occurrence and recurrence of venous/arterial thromboembolism and/or pregnancy morbidity and qualifies the patient for anticoagulation therapy. The laboratory diagnosis for LA that is used for crucial decision-making about the optimal duration of the therapy rests entirely on diagnostic criteria. These criteria are based on the prolongation of phospholipid-dependent tests not corrected upon mixing patient and normal plasmas, with confirmation provided by the evidence that the anticoagulant is directed against proteins bound to negatively charged phospholipids.

AIMS

This article reviews issues related to the diagnosis of LA, including the effect of preanalytical variables, choice of tests, results interpretation of screening, mixing and confirmation procedures, patients to be investigated, and transmission of results. Unresolved issues and future direction for research on laboratory diagnosis are also discussed.

METHODS

Search of PubMed with the key term "lupus anticoagulant" plus articles and unpublished data known to the author.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The preanalytical variables (i.e., plasma preparation and storage before analysis) as well as the diagnostic steps to detect LA present potential problems that undermine the process of making a correct diagnosis. A truly specific test for LA detection is badly needed, but its development may require understanding of the mechanisms associated with the occurrence of clinical events. Until then, clinical laboratories should rely on the existing procedures, which must be applied with caution and awareness of the many issues that may affect their results.

Lupus anticoagulant is significantly associated with inflammatory reactions in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are suggested as risk factors for development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among patients without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Other conditions, e.g. inflammation, are reported to induce LA and it is uncertain whether the association between LA and DVT is causal. In this study the associations between aPL, LA and inflammation were investigated in 170 consecutive patients without SLE, but with a tentative diagnosis of DVT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

DVT was diagnosed in 64 patients. LA was determined according to the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The concentration of anticardiolipin (aCL) and beta(2)-glycoprotein I (anti-beta(2)-GPI) antibodies as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined with sensitive and precise methods.

RESULTS

LA was demonstrated in 8 patients with DVT and in 10 patients without DVT, relative risk 1.33 (CI: 0.55-3.18). No significant association was observed between aCL or anti-beta(2)-GPI and DVT. Patients suffering from DVT had significantly higher concentrations of CRP than patients without DVT. However, CRP was also significantly higher in patients positive for LA than in patients without LA irrespective of the presence of DVT (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports a strong association between inflammatory reactions and development of LA in patients with suspected DVT, whereas no significant association was demonstrated between LA or aPL and DVT.

Evaluation of a new silica clotting time in the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

A new commercial silica clotting time (SCT), the HemosIL SCT assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy) was evaluated in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LAC). This integrated test system for screening and confirmation was compared with the frequently used aPTT-based PTT-LA and Staclot-LA (Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France) in a patient population investigated for LAC and in a subpopulation who met the clinical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

201 samples were analysed with the HemosIL SCT assay. Own reference values were calculated. Results are expressed as measured clotting times in seconds or as normalised ratios.

RESULTS

SCT screen and PTT-LA had a sensitivity of, 61.1% and 63.8%, respectively. Normalising the results gained sensitivity up to 72.2% and 90%, respectively. The confirmation SCT and the Staclot-LA had a sensitivity of 30.6% and 63.9% with a specificity of 86.7% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity of SCT for detecting LAC in clinical criteria positive patients was lower compared to aPTT and dRVVT (45.8% versus 66.7% and 65%). Combination of SCT/dRVVT and aPTT/dRVVT gave a sensitivity of 51.2% and 63.6%, with a specificity of 50.0% and 52.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with PTT-LA as screening test, the SCT screen shows an acceptable sensitivity. However, the HemosIL SCT assay including the confirmation step, has a much lower sensitivity in the diagnosis of LAC in comparison with the Staclot-LA test. Combining the HemosIL SCT assay with dRVVT results in a better sensitivity, although lower than the combined aPTT/dRVVT based method as usually performed in our lab.

Interpretation of normal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Mixing studies are part of the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LA). They are used to determine the evidence of an inhibitor by demonstrating persistence of an abnormal clotting time by mixing patient plasma with normal plasma. Since there is no standardised interpretation of results of mixing studies, percent correction formulas are proposed. The sensitivity of mixing studies strongly depends on the interpretation of the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 361 samples, 75 LA-positive and 286 LA-negative samples. For all the LA-positive samples and for 181/286 LA-negative samples mixing tests on one or more screening tests were performed. A percent correction formula and the Rosner index were calculated for all mixing tests on aPTT and dPT.

RESULTS

The <70% correction formula for the mixing tests on aPTT showed the highest sensitivity (95%). The Rosner index had a sensitivity (93%) comparable with the <70% correction formula. dPT is shown to be less sensitive in the detection for LA and, even when the screening test is prolonged, interpretation of the mixing test by the percent correction formula misclassifies many samples. Rosner index in the interpretation of mixing tests for dPT is more sensitive than the percent correction formula, 49% and 57%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the Rosner index and the percent correction formulas for interpretation of mixing studies are complementary and can help to reduce misclassification of LA-positive or LA-negative samples.

Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing: Which Are Most Useful for Diagnosis?

Laboratory diagnosis of APS relies on the demonstration of a positive test for aPL. In clinical practice, the gold standard tests are those that detect beta2GPI-dependent aCL or LA. The question on the use of anti-beta2GPI asa routine diagnostic test remains unanswered, and testing for these antibodies should be only performed in very selected cases and not as an alternative to aCL or LA testing. Clinical utility and standardization are still lacking for other aPL specificities; therefore, their application as routine diagnostic tools is not recommended.

International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

New clinical, laboratory and experimental insights, since the 1999 publication of the Sapporo preliminary classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), had been addressed at a workshop in Sydney, Australia, before the Eleventh International Congress on antiphospholipid antibodies. In this document, we appraise the existing evidence on clinical and laboratory features of APS addressed during the forum. Based on this, we propose amendments to the Sapporo criteria. We also provide definitions on features of APS that were not included in the updated criteria.

The dilution effect of equal volume mixing studies compromises confirmation of inhibition by lupus anticoagulants even when mixture specific reference ranges are applied

INTRODUCTION

One of the recommended criteria for the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LA) is demonstration of inhibitory activity. This is confirmed by performing mixing tests with normal plasma, usually in a 1:1 ratio, and demonstrating persistence of an abnormal clotting time in the screening test with significant confirmatory test reduction. However, the mixing with normal plasma can dilute the antibodies to undetectable levels and generate apparent negative results. No guidelines or consensus exist in how to interpret mixing study results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study assessed the 1:1 mixing study results from 600 patients with a thrombotic history positive for LA demonstrated in neat plasma by individual assays, or combinations, of dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay and Taipan snake venom time, plus confirmatory tests. Mixing tests were assessed initially using locally derived neat plasma reference ranges and subsequently with mixture specific ranges.

RESULTS

The mixture specific ranges had lower upper limits. Of the total LA positive results, 32.5% were positive in the mixing studies when neat plasma reference ranges were applied, and a further 11.2% demonstrated LA activity when using the mixture specific ranges. The remaining 56.3% had been diluted such that they did not elevate the screening test above the upper limit of normal or generated minimal prolongation with an insignificant difference between the screen and confirmatory test result sufficient to confirm LA activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant impact of the dilution effect in 1:1 mixing studies emphasises the limitations of mixing studies as a vehicle for confirmation of inhibition by LA antibodies.

Effect of subcutaneous administration of dalteparin on lupus anticoagulant assays

INTRODUCTION

Treatment with unfractionated heparin (UH) is known to affect screening tests for lupus anticoagulant (LA). False positive test results are common because confirmatory steps lack sufficient specificity to distinguish between LA and the presence of heparin. In this study, we wanted to see if therapeutic levels of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may cause false positive tests for LA or alter the LA test results in LA-positive patients. We also wanted to evaluate the need to include heparin-neutralizing agents in the reagents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six healthy subjects without LA and six LA-positive patients were given 100 IU/kg dalteparin subcutaneously (s.c.). Samples for three in-house and two commercially available LA tests were taken before and 4 h after the injection. LA test results were calculated as normalized screening/confirm ratios or as recommended by the manufacturers.

RESULTS

With both healthy subjects and LA patients, only small and clinically unimportant differences in mean clotting times and final test results were seen 4 h after subcutaneous dalteparin injections, at anti-FXa activities within the therapeutic range.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study with dalteparin suggests that LMWH therapy with plasma concentrations within the therapeutic range does not cause false positive tests for LA when normalized screening/confirm ratios are applied; nor do test results for LA-positive patients seem to be significantly altered. Heparin-neutralizing agents did not influence test performance.

Alteration in the laboratory profile of a lupus anticoagulant in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

We describe a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed a lupus anticoagulant (LA) detectable by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) and kaolin clotting time (KCT). IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were elevated. At a later admission, and following treatment for the lymphoma, routine coagulation screening showed an elevated prothrombin time (PT) without correction in mixing tests using a recombinant thromboplastin. Routine APTT was below the reference range and ACA levels were normal. Raw data for one-stage factor assays demonstrated the presence of an inhibitor. Analysis for LA was undertaken by DRVVT, KCT, activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, Taipan snake venom time, platelet neutralisation procedures (PNP), Ecarin time and PT using rabbit brain thromboplastin. The results revealed a LA capable of prolonging the clotting times of the PNPs and PT using recombinant thromboplastin, but that was corrected using Ecarin venom, modified PNP and brain thromboplastin. The antibody also demonstrated the lupus anticoagulant co-factor effect. The factor VIII: C was markedly raised which may have masked the LA in the APTT. The changing laboratory profile over time demonstrates the effects of LA heterogeneity and variations in sensitivity and specificity of assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies.

Heterogeneity of Russell's viper venom affects the sensitivity of the dilute Russell's viper venom time to lupus anticoagulants

A number of studies have shown that commercial dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) reagents vary in their sensitivity for lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection. The differences in performance are considered to be predominantly due to antibody heterogeneity and a wide variation in phospholipid content, and also the techniques and clot detection methods employed. The present study compared the LA detection rates of five different Russell's viper venom (RVV) preparations using identical phospholipid reagents to assess the contribution of venom heterogeneity to LA detection by DRVVT. Initial analysis of 300 samples sent for thrombophilia screening identified 48 (16.0%) LAs by DRVVT and confirmatory tests with a single RVV reagent. Subsequent DRVVT analysis of all 300 samples using the other four venom reagents, with confirmatory tests on samples with elevated screen ratios, revealed a further 38 LAs in a variety of combinations of reagents. Only 15 of 86 (17.4%) of LAs were detected with all five RVV reagents. Significant biological variation of RVV exists due to differences between Russell's viper subspecies and a variety of environmental and physiological factors. The clear variations in diagnostic performance between alternative RVV preparations are most probably due to biological venom heterogeneity, and also differences in the manufacturing processes.

The Ecarin time is an improved confirmatory test for the Taipan snake venom time in warfarinized patients with lupus anticoagulants

The Taipan snake venom time using dilute phospholipid as a screening test with a platelet neutralization procedure as a confirmatory test has been shown to be a sensitive and specific approach to detection of lupus anticoagulants. Taipan venom is largely insensitive to the effects of ongoing warfarin anticoagulation and this can be useful in detection of lupus anticoagulants in patients receiving this treatment. This study compared the use of the platelet neutralization procedure with the Ecarin time as confirmatory tests for the Taipan snake venom time, the Ecarin venom fraction being insensitive to both lupus anticoagulants and the effects of oral anticoagulants. Screening and confirmatory test data were assessed for phospholipid dependence by three different mathematical methods and there was no advantage in using the Ecarin time in detection of 'uncomplicated' lupus anticoagulants. In lupus anticoagulant-positive warfarinized patients, the Ecarin time achieved higher detection rates than the platelet neutralization procedure irrespective of the method used to assess correction. The Ecarin time confirmed lupus anticoagulants in all of those samples that generated elevated Taipan snake venom time ratios whereas the platelet neutralization procedure identified only 33%. Taipan snake venom time plus Ecarin time offers good diagnostic precision for lupus anticoagulant detection in a group of patients where lupus anticoagulant identification is difficult due to ongoing anticoagulation.

The Activated Seven Lupus Anticoagulant (ASLA) assay: a new test for lupus anticoagulants (LAs). Evidence that some LAs are detectable only in extrinsic pathway-based assays

Accurate and timely detection of lupus anticoagulants (LAs) is of diagnostic and prognostic importance due to the association of persistent LAs with thrombotic disease. In the present study, a sensitive and specific assay for LAs has been developed using recombinant activated factor VII to initiate in vitro coagulation. The Activated Seven Lupus Anticoagulant (ASLA) assay uses dilute brain-derived phospholipid in the screening test and a platelet neutralization procedure (PNP) in the confirmatory test. Tests are reported as ratios of patient clotting time to normal control clotting time and percentage correction by PNP assessed for abnormal ratios. Evaluation with 70 known LA-positive plasmas demonstrated higher detection rates than with individual assays from a wide range of commonly employed LA tests. The ASLA assay identified 61 of 70 (87%) known LAs, compared with 65.7% with the most sensitive of the other assays. The various LA assays were used to test 110 plasma samples from patients with thrombotic disease previously negative for LA. These experiments demonstrated that 18 of 110 (16.4%) contained LAs detectable only in extrinsic pathway-based assays, 10 of these by ASLA testing alone. ASLA testing showed high diagnostic precision and has the potential to make a significant contribution to LA detection.