AB1330 AUTOMATIC SUBPIXEL MEASUREMENT OF RADIOGRAPHIC FINGER JOINT SPACE NARROWING IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS UNDER TOCILIZUMAB TREATMENT

Background

The conventional scoring methods of radiographic joint space narrowing (JSN) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) such as the Genant-modified Sharp score (GSS) are widely accepted but include subjective and time-consuming nature1. Therefore, we have developed an in-house software equipped with partial image phase-only correlation (PIPOC)2 which can automatically quantify joint space width (JSW) change.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the in-house software can predict the inhibitory effect of tocilizumab on joint destruction in a short period of time.

Methods

The study included 39 RA patients (35 female) who were treated with tocilizumab (Table 1). Radiological progression of the metacarpophalangeal and the proximal interphalangeal joints was evaluated according to the GSS at 0, 6, and 12 months. Automatic measurement was performed by the in-house software (Figure 1). We then validated in-house software in terms of accuracy in detecting the JSN.

Figure 1.

The algorithm flow of in-house software equipped with PIPOC

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of RA patients

variablebaseline6 months12 monthsTotal number of patients39Sex, female/male35/4Rheumatoid factor status, positive/negative29/10Age, mean (SD) years61.5 (14.6)Duration of disease, mean (SD) months111.4 (85.0)Swollen joint count, mean (SD)6.0 (4.7)3.5 (3.5)2.9 (4.0)Tender joint count, mean (SD)6.4 (3.5)2.9 (2.2)1.9 (2.0)DAS28-ESR, mean (SD)4.9 (1.2)3.0 (1.1)2.6 (1.0)DAS28-CRP, mean (SD)4.4 (1.1)3.0 (0.9)2.6 (0.8)

RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SD, standard deviation; DAS28, disease activity score with 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein

Results

To ensure homogeneity of the subjects, we targeted the joints with GSS = 0 at baseline in the software analysis. The success rate of the in-house software for JSW measurement was 96.8% (449/464). Here, the GSS (+)/PIPOC (+) were defined as joints with JSN progression according to the GSS and the software analysis, respectively. Otherwise, joints were defined as the GSS (-)/PIPOC (-) namely non-progressive JSN. The 0–12-month GSS with the 0–6-month GSS (+) group was significantly more JSN progression than the 0–6-month GSS (-) group (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). Similarly, the 0–12-month PIPOC with the 0–6-month PIPOC (+) group was significantly more JSN progression than the 0–6-month PIPOC (-) group (p < 0.001). The 0–12-month JSW change of finger joints with the 0–12-month GSS (+) detected by the in-house software was significantly greater than the 0–12-month GSS (-) (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Our in-house software equipped with PIPOC might be able to predict the subsequent joint destruction with 6 months observations.

References

[1]Genant HK, et al: Assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a modified scoring method on digitized and original radiographs. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology 1998, 41(9):1583-1590.

[2]Ou Y, et al: Automatic Radiographic Quantification of Joint Space Narrowing Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using POC. In: 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). 2019: 1183-1187.

Disclosure of Interests

Taichi Okino: None declared, Yafei Ou: None declared, Masayuki Ikebe: None declared, Akira Furusaki: None declared, Akira Sagawa: None declared, Masaru Kato: None declared, Tatsuya Atsumi: None declared, Tamotsu Kamishima Grant/research support from: Tamotsu Kamishima reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical.

POS0794 PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH IN TAKAYASU ARTERITIS IN JAPAN – A NATIONWIDE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Background

Takayasu arteritis (TAK), a granulomatous large vessel vasculitis, mainly involves the aorta and its proximal branches and commonly occurs in young females. However, studies of pregnancy in women with TAK are sparse and limited, probably due to the rarity of the disease.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to understand the status quo of medical treatments of the primary disease and outcomes of pregnancy in patients with TAK, and birth outcomes of the children in Japan.

Methods

Patients with TAK who conceived after the onset of the disease and were managed at medical facilities participating in the Japan Research Committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare for Intractable Vasculitis (JPVAS) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The following information was collected from patients who had a live-born baby: age at diagnosis of TAK, disease classification, age at delivery, treatments before and during pregnancy, complications during pregnancy, birth outcomes of the children, and changes in disease activity during pregnancy and after delivery.

Results

Fifty-one cases and 69 pregnancies from 19 ethics committee-approved centers were enrolled during the study period 2019–2021. Of these, 49 cases and 66 pregnancies (95.7%) resulted in delivery and live-born babies. The Numano classification of the 49 cases was as follows: type I, 11; type IIa, 15; type IIb,12; type III, 1; type IV, 1; type V, 9; with type IIa being the most common. The age of diagnosis was 22 years (13–37 years, year of diagnosis 1965–2017), the median age of the delivery of 66 pregnancies was 31 years (year of delivery 1969-2021), and the median duration of illness at delivery was nine years. There were 34 planned pregnancies (51.5%, including four pregnancies by artificial insemination/ovulation induction). Preconception therapy included prednisolone (PSL) in 51 pregnancies (77.3%, median dose 7.5 mg (range 4–30 mg)/day), immunosuppressive drugs in 18 pregnancies (27.3%, azathioprine 8, tacrolimus 7, methotrexate 4, cyclosporin A 1, and colchicine 1), biologics in 12 pregnancies (18.1%, infliximab 6, tocilizumab 5, and adalimumab 1), antihypertensive drugs in 5 pregnancies (7.6%). Surgical treatment had been performed before pregnancy in 6 cases (aortic root replacement 2, subclavian artery dilatation 1, subclavian artery bypass 1, subclavian artery stenting 1, and ascending aorta semicircular artery replacement 1). Medications used during the course of pregnancy included PSL in 48 pregnancies (72.7%, median dose 8 mg (range 4–30 mg)/day, increased in 13 pregnancies, decreased in 1 pregnancy), immunosuppressants in 13 pregnancies (19.7%, azathioprine 6, tacrolimus 6, and cyclosporin A 1), biologics 9 pregnancies (13.6%, infliximab 4, tocilizumab 4, and adalimumab 1). Immunosuppressants and biologics were discontinued in five and four pregnancies after conception. Complications during pregnancy were observed in 20 pregnancies (30.3%), with hypertension being the most common. Complications related to TAK or its treatment were severe infections in two pregnancies and aneurysm enlargement due to increased circulating plasma volume in one pregnancy. Aortic arch replacement was performed after delivery for the latter case. Relapse of TAK was observed in 4 pregnancies (6.1%) during pregnancy and in 8 pregnancies (12.1%) after delivery. One pregnancy resulted in restenosis of subclavian artery for which dilatation procedure was performed prior to the pregnancy. There were 13/66 (19.7%) preterm infants and 17/59 (28.8%) low birth weight infants; all but one had a birth weight of more than 2,000 g and no had serious postnatal abnormalities. Forty-three (82.7%) of the 52 confirmed infants were breastfeed fully or mixed.

Conclusion

Most of the pregnancies in patients with TAK were successfully delivered while they had low disease activity at a dose of less than 10 mg/day of PSL. Relapse occurred during pregnancy and after delivery in some cases. The babies tended to have low birth weight, but 82.7% of them were breastfed without serious complications.

Disclosure of Interests

Takako Miyamae: None declared, Yusuke Manabe: None declared, takahiko sugihara Speakers bureau: TS has received honoraria from Abbvie Japan Co., Ltd., AsahiKASEI Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and UCB Japan Co., Grant/research support from: TS has received research grants from AsahiKASEI Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Ono Pharmaceutical., Natsuka Umezawa: None declared, Hajime Yoshifuji Speakers bureau: HY has received lecture fees from Janssen and Chugai., Naoto Tamura: None declared, Yoshiyuki Abe: None declared, Shunsuke Furuta Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.

DaiichiSankyo Co.,Ltd.

Asahi-Kasei Pharma Corporation, Manami Kato: None declared, Takashi Kumagai: None declared, Kaito Nakamura: None declared, Hiroko Nagafuchi: None declared, Jun Ishizaki: None declared, Naoko Nakano: None declared, Tatsuya Atsumi Speakers bureau: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.,TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Consultant of: AstraZeneca plc., MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES CO., LTD., Pfizer Inc., AbbVie Inc., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD.,

Novartis Pharma K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.AbbVie Inc., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.,Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Pfizer Inc. Alexion Inc., TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED., Kohei Karino: None declared, Koichi Amano Speakers bureau: AbbVie GK, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd., Eisai, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKlein, Janssen Pharma, Pfizer Japan, Grant/research support from: Asahi-Kasei Pharma,Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd., Takahiko Kurasawa: None declared, Shuichi Ito: None declared, Ryusuke Yoshimi: None declared, Noriyoshi Ogawa: None declared, Shogo Banno: None declared, Taio Naniwa Speakers bureau: Chugai, Tanabe, Abbbvie, Eisai, Grant/research support from: Chugai, Tanabe, Abbbvie, Eisai, Satoshi Ito Speakers bureau: SI has received speaker’s fees from pharmaceutical companies., Akinori Hara: None declared, Shinya Hirahara: None declared, Haruhito A. Uchida: None declared, Yasuhiro Onishi: None declared, Yohko Murakawa Speakers bureau: Astellas, UCB, Chugai, AbbVie, Grant/research support from: Chugai, AbbVie, Yoshinori Komagata: None declared, Yoshikazu Nakaoka: None declared, Masayoshi Harigai Speakers bureau: MH has received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Japan, Pfizer Japan Inc., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Teijin Pharma Ltd and UCB Japan., Consultant of: MH is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Teijin Pharma.

POS0678 CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF METHOTREXATE (MTX)-NAIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) PATIENTS (pts) ON FILGOTINIB (FIL) LONG-TERM EXTENSION (LTE) TRIAL INITIALLY ON FIL OR MTX DURING THE PHASE 3 PARENT STUDY (PS)

Background

The preferential Janus kinase-1 inhibitor FIL is approved for treatment of moderate to severe active RA in Europe and Japan.

Objectives

In this post hoc, exploratory analysis, efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with FIL (± MTX) were assessed in MTX-naïve pts treated with FIL or MTX in the Phase 3 PS (NCT02886728).1

Methods

Pts received FIL 200 mg (FIL200)+MTX, FIL 100 mg (FIL100)+MTX, FIL200 alone, or MTX alone up to 52 W in PS.1 Those completing PS on study drug could enter LTE (NCT03025308; data cutoff: June 1, 2020). MTX completers were rerandomized, blinded, to FIL200 or FIL100; pts on FIL in PS remained on the same dose in LTE. MTX was washed out for 4 W at LTE baseline (BL); pts could (re)start MTX and/or other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) ≥4 W after LTE first dosing.1 Efficacy data to LTE W48 and safety data are reported.

Results

As of June 1, 2020, 439/492 (89%) and 144/169 (85%) pts who entered LTE from PS FIL200 and PS FIL100 groups, respectively, remained on LTE study treatment; of those rerandomized from MTX, 131/148 (89%) FIL200 and 133/151 (88%) FIL100 pts remained on study treatment. LTE BL characteristics were similar between FIL200 and FIL100 groups. After MTX washout, 17% of FIL200 and 23% of FIL100 pts (re)started MTX (at clinical judgment). ACR20/50/70 response rates among pts from PS FIL arms decreased modestly from LTE BL to W12 then stabilized. Among pts who switched from PS MTX to LTE FIL, response rates remained stable or improved to approach those of PS FIL pts by W48 (Figure 1). Similar trends were seen in DAS28(CRP) and CDAI. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 AEs, serious AEs, and infections were largely comparable across groups and did not increase after MTX to FIL switch. There were 6 deaths, all among PS FIL200 pts (Table 1).

Table 1.

EAIRs of TEAEs through June 2020

EAIR (95% CI)FIL200+MTX →FIL200 →FIL100+MTX →MTX →MTX →FIL200 LTEFIL200 LTEFIL100 LTEFIL200 LTEFIL100 LTEn=325n=167n=169n=148n=151PYE=474.4PYE=232.5PYE=236.4PYE=213.4PYE=215.4TEAE49.7 (43.8, 56.5)46.9 (38.9, 56.6)49.9 (41.7, 59.8)50.6 (41.9, 61.1)46.4 (38.2, 56.5)TEAE Grade ≥37.2 (5.1, 10.0)6.5 (3.9, 10.7)10.2 (6.8, 15.1)7.0 (4.2, 11.7)7.0 (4.2, 11.6)TE serious AE5.9 (4.1, 8.5)6.0 (3.6, 10.2)8.9 (5.8, 13.6)6.6 (3.9, 11.1)6.5 (3.9, 11.0)Death1.1 (0.3, 2.5)0.4 (0.1, 3.1)0 (0, 1.6)0 (0, 1.7)0 (0, 1.7)Infections28.5 (24.0, 33.7)29.7 (23.4, 37.6)27.5 (21.6, 35.1)28.6 (22.2, 36.7)27.4 (21.2, 35.4)Serious infections1.1 (0.4, 2.5)3.0 (1.4, 6.3)2.5 (1.1, 5.7)1.9 (0.7, 5.0)1.9 (0.7, 4.9)Opportunistic infections0.2 (0, 1.5)0 (0, 1.6)0.8 (0.2, 3.4)0 (0, 1.7)0 (0, 1.7)Herpes zoster0.8 (0.3, 2.2)1.7 (0.6, 4.6)0.8 (0.2, 3.4)1.9 (0.7, 5.0)0.9 (0.2, 3.7)MACE (adjudicated)0.6 (0.1, 1.8)0.9 (0.2, 3.4)0 (0, 1.6)0 (0, 1.7)0 (0, 1.7)VTE (adjudicated for DVT/PE)0.2 (0, 1.2)0.4 (0.1, 3.1)0 (0, 1.6)0 (0, 1.7)0 (0, 1.7)Malignancies (excluding NMSC)0.6 (0.2, 2.0)0 (0, 1.6)1.7 (0.6, 4.5)0.5 (0, 2.6)0 (0, 1.7)NMSC0.6 (0.2, 2.0)0.4 (0.1, 3.1)0.8 (0.2, 3.4)0.5 (0, 2.6)0 (0, 1.7)

DVT, deep vein thrombosis; EAIRs, exposure-adjusted incidence rates (per 100 patient-years of exposure); MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer; PE, pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism

Figure 1.

Conclusion

Overall, response rates improved from LTE BL to W48 for pts switched from PS MTX to FIL and decreased modestly for PS FIL pts. Rates of AEs of special interest were generally low and tended to be higher in pts maintained on FIL from PS. Safety findings in this subpopulation were comparable with the PS through W521 and with a 7-trial integrated safety analysis.2 Limitations: the LTE was not formally randomized at BL, the groups were of unequal size, and the switch from MTX to FIL for LTE was by design rather than based on disease activity.

References

[1]Westhovens R et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:727–38.

[2]Winthrop K et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(suppl 10): abstract 0229.

Acknowledgements

Funding for the trials was provided by Galapagos NV and Gilead Sciences, Inc. The sponsors participated in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the research. This study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Medical writing support was provided by Gregory Bezkorovainy, MA, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA; and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Funding for this analysis was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Disclosure of Interests

Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Medac, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi/Genzyme, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi/Genzyme, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche, Rene Westhovens Consultant of: Celltrion, Galapagos, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., Grant/research support from: Celltrion, Galapagos, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., Tatsuya Atsumi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Inc., Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Eisai Co. Ltd, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Pfizer Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, UCB Japan Co. Ltd, Consultant of: AbbVie Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Pfizer Inc., UCB Japan Co. Ltd, Grant/research support from: AbbVie Inc., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Inc., YingMeei Tan Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Qi Gong Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Vijay Rajendran Shareholder of: Galapagos NV, Employee of: Galapagos NV, Sander Strengholt Shareholder of: Galapagos BV, Employee of: Galapagos BV, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Pfizer

AB0201 INTAKE OF FISH RICH IN n-3 POLYUNSATURATED FATTY ACIDS IS ASSOCIATED WITH GOOD RESPONSE TO TREATMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS RECEIVING TARGETED THERAPIES

Background

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been transformed by the use of molecular targeted therapies. Early treatment and treat-to-target approach leads to good clinical response and remission (responders), but not in all patients.

Environmental factors including diet contribute to the development, activity and severity of RA. Evidence from clinical trials suggested that dietary interventions, such as Mediterranean diet or supplementation with fish oil rich in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA), have positive effects on RA. Japanese and Mediterranean diets are associated with longevity and characterized by high fish intake. Clinical studies have identified predictors of treatment response in individual RA patients, however, the influence of fish consumption on treatment response in RA patients treated with targeted therapies has not been elucidated.

Objectives

To assess whether fish consumption is associated with a good response to targeted therapies in RA patients with Japanese and Mediterranean dietary patterns.

Methods

The study is a collaborative international cross-sectional retrospective study enrolling patients with RA on treatment with biologics or JAK inhibitors attending to Hokkaido University Hospital, Japan or Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Spain.

Enrolled patients were asked to complete a brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ) and a detailed fish frequency questionnaire (DFFQ) referring to consumption frequency in the previous month. At study entry, alcohol consumption, tobacco habits, educational level and employment status were recorded and RA disease activity evaluated by qualified rheumatologists. Demographic, clinical/laboratory data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records.

By December 2021, 279 patients (Japan 217, Spain 62) returned the questionnaires. A preliminary analysis was carried out with the first 58 Japanese patients in which all clinical and laboratory data could be collected. A descriptive analysis was performed and the relative risks approximated by odds ratios.

Results

Fifty-eight Japanese RA patients, 45 females, median age at entry 66 yrs [IQR 54-73], median disease duration 11yrs [IQR 7-20] were included in this analysis. Fifty-three (93%) of patients were on biologic therapies and four (7%) on JAK inhibitors with a median treatment duration of 4.5 yrs [IQR 1-7]. Concomitant treatment with conventional DMARDS and glucocorticoids were reported in 69% and 48% of patients, respectively. Forty-two (72%) patients were responders to treatment defined as DASESR ≦3.2. Another systemic autoimmune disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia or gout history were present in 29%, 29%, 9%, 33% and 10% of patients, respectively.

All patients had consumption of fish in the last month and an intake of n3-PUFA rich fish (fatty fish) was indicated by 82% (<1 time/week 34%, ≧ 1 time/week 48%).

The patients’ fatty and non-fatty fish intake scores were calculated with a mathematical formula based on the intake of each of the fish included in the DFFQ and number of responses. In the group of high fatty fish score patients (≧ 1 time/week) 94% were responders to treatment vs. 6% non-responders, [OR 8.75, CI [1.0-73.54, p= 0.022] while only 63% of patients in the high non-fatty fish score group respond to the treatment.

Conclusion

Fatty fish intake associated with a good response to treatment in patients receiving targeted therapies, suggesting that fish consumption may have some beneficial effects on RA treatment.

References

There is no reference.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements to Ms. Y. Ikea and S. Kumagai for their enriching support on the nutritional properties of fish. Supported by the Kakenhi C grant number 20K11597 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0112 THE EVER-LARGEST ASIAN GWAS FOR SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS AND TRANS-POPULATION META-ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED SEVEN NOVEL LOCI AND A CANDIDATE CAUSAL SNP IN A CIS-REGULATORY ELEMENT OF THE FCGR REGION

Background

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified 29 disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) regions (1-7). While these GWASs have clarified genetic architectures of SSc, study subjects were mainly Caucasians limiting application of the findings to Asians.

Objectives

The study was conducted to identify novel causal variants for SSc specific to Japanese subjects as well as those shared with European population. We also aimed to clarify mechanistic effects of the variants on pathogenesis of SSc.

Methods

A total of 114,108 subjects comprising 1,499 cases and 112,609 controls were enrolled in the two-staged study leading to the ever-largest Asian GWAS for SSc. After applying a strict quality control both for genotype and samples, imputation was conducted using the reference panel of the phase 3v5 1,000 genome project data combined with a high-depth whole-genome sequence data of 3,256 Japanese subjects. We conducted logistic regression analyses and also combined the Japanese GWAS results with those of Europeans (6) by an inverse-variance fixed-effect model. Polygenicity and enrichment of functional annotations were evaluated by linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC), Haploreg and IMPACT programs. We also constructed polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict SSc development.

Results

We identified three (FCRLA-FCGR, TNFAIP3, PLD4) and four (EOMES, ESR1, SLC12A5, TPI1P2) novel loci in Japanese GWAS and a trans-population meta-analysis, respectively. One of Japanese novel risk SNPs, rs6697139, located within FCGR gene clusters had a strong effect size (OR 2.05, P=4.9×10-11). We also found the complete LD variant, rs10917688, was positioned in cis-regulatory element and binding motif for an immunomodulatory transcription factor IRF8 in B cells, another genome-wide significant locus in our trans-ethnic meta-analysis and the previous European GWAS. Notably, the association of risk allele of rs10917688 was significant only in the presence of the risk allele of the IRF8. Intriguingly, rs10917688 was annotated as one enhancer-related histone marks, H3K4me1, in B cells, implying that FCGR gene(s) in B cells may play an important role in the pathogenesis of SSc. Furhtermore, significant heritability enrichment of active histone marks and a transcription factor C-Myc were found in B cells both in European and Japanese populations by LDSC and IMPACT, highlighting a possibility of a shared disease mechanism where abnormal B-cell activation may be one of the key drivers for the disease development. Finally, PRS using effects sizes of European GWAS moderately fit in the development of Japanese SSc (AUC 0.593), paving a path to personalized medicine for SSc.

Conclusion

Our study identified seven novel susceptibility loci in SSc. Downstream analyses highlighted a novel disease mechanism of SSc where an interactive role of FCGR gene(s) and IRF8 may accelerate the disease development and B cells may play a key role on the pathogenesis of SSc.

References

[1]F. C. Arnett et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010.

[2]T. R. Radstake et al. Nat Genet, 2010.

[3]Y. Allanore et al. PLoS Genet, 2011.

[4]O. Gorlova et al. PLoS Genet, 2011.

[5]C. Terao et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017.

[6]E. López-Isac et al. Nat Commun, 2019.

[7]W. Pu et al. J Invest Dermatol, 2021.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0458 DISEASE ACTIVITY AT CONCEPTION PREDICTS LUPUS FLARE UP TO 2 YEARS AFTER BIRTH: A MULTICENTRE LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP STUDY

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often affects women in their childbearing years, and pregnancy may affect SLE disease activity during pregnancy and post-partum (1,2). Limited data assessing the likelihood and characteristics of SLE activity in an extended time period post-partum which may be relevant as patients may wish further pregnancies exist.

Objectives

To assess predicting factors that might influence SLE disease activity in women in an extended follow-up period of 2 years after giving birth and clinical assessment every three months.

Methods

The study was design as an international retrospective, data-driven case collection study, enrolling 119 women with a first birth and with a strictly monitored follow-up period of 2 years.

Results

Table 1 shows pregnancy outcomes of all pregnancies. When considering disease manifestations, joint involvement was present in 80% of patients, acute cutaneous in 64%, haematological in 54%and renal in 41%; 75% of patients were positive for anti-dsDNA, 49% for anti-ENA and 37% for anti-Ro/SSA positive. The mean SLE disease activity index 2000(SLEDAI-2k) at diagnosis was 13.5±6.8 and at first birth was 2.8±4.4.

Table 1.

Pregnancy outcomes of all pregnancies and relative breastfeeding data

Pregnancy CharacteristicsAll (214)%OutcomesLive births16979Miscarriages3717.3Stillbirths83.7Maternal and Foetal ComplicationsPrematurity3918.2Pre-eclampsia2310.7HELLP syndrome41.9Placental Infarction125.6Breastfeeding (all pregnancies)Any breastfeeding (n, %)10964.5*Exclusive breastfeeding (n, %)8751.5*Breastfeeding (after first birth)Any breastfeeding (n, %)8773.1**Any breastfeeding duration (months) (m±sd)10.29±10.04Exclusive breastfeeding*** (n, %)6252.1**Exclusive breastfeeding*** duration (months) (m±sd)6.07±6

*Percentages are calculated considering viable babies (total= 169)

**Percentages are calculated considering first birth (total= 119)

***Exclusive breastfeeding was defined as feeding infants only breast milk

At follow-up, 51.3% of patients had at least one flare after a mean time after birth of 9±6.3 months(mean flare per patient 0.94±1.1). The most frequent flare manifestations were joint involvement(48%), followed by renal(33%), cutaneous(28%) and haematologic(20%).

Patients with remission of disease(SLEDAI-2K=0; no clinical or laboratory manifestations of SLE) at conception had significantly lower rates of flares than those not in remission (18/49–37% vs. 43/70–61%;p=0.008) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flare proportion: Survival Curve based on remission status at conception of the patients included in the study.

Patients who experienced a flare during pregnancy (17 patients), when compared to those who did not, had higher rates of flares during follow-up (76% vs. 47%, respectively, p=0.019), lower time for first flare (4.4±2.3 months vs. 10.3±6.5, respectively, p<0.001), lower rate of remission of disease at conception (12% vs. 46%, respectively, p<0.001), lower rates of SLEDAI 2K at conception (5.9±5.6 vs. 2.3±4, respectively, p<0.001) and lower rates of exclusive breastfeeding (24% vs. 57%, respectively, p=0.009).

Remission of disease and flares during pregnancy remained significantly associated with the development of flares during follow-up after multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Remission at conception can influence SLE disease positively, even at long-term. Planned pregnancy counseling is fundamental when managing SLE patients.

References

[1]Tincani A, Nalli C, Khizroeva J, Bitsadze V, Lojacono A, Andreoli L, et al. Autoimmune diseases and pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;33.

[2]Clowse MEB, Magder LS, Witter F, Petri M. The impact of increased lupus activity on obstetric outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:514–521.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0462 HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE REDUCES THE TITERS OF ANTI-DOMAIN 1 ANTIBODIES OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENTLY POSITIVE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES: RESULTS FROM THE APS ACTION CLINICAL DATABASE AND REPOSITORY (“REGISTRY”)

Background

Data on fluctuation of antibodies directed against domain 1 (anti-D1) of β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) are scarce. Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and all three criteria tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) display higher titers of anti-D1, which correlate with anti-β2GPI levels.

Objectives

This project aims at evaluating predictors of the variation of anti-D1 titers over time in a large international cohort of persistently aPL positive patients.

Methods

AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance For Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Registry was created to study the course of persistently aPL-positive patients with or without autoimmune disorders over at least 10 years. Inclusion criteria are positive aPL by Updated Sapporo Criteria tested within one year prior to enrolment. Patients are followed every 12±3 months with clinical data and blood collection. Patients with available blood samples from at least three time points were included in this analysis. Anti-β2GPI and anti-D1 IgG were tested by chemiluminescence (BioFlash, Werfen) at APS ACTION core laboratories. Positive results were defined as >20 CU, according to the manufacturer. Clinical data were retrieved from APS ACTION online database. Anti-D1 titers within the same subject were compared by Friedman’s test. A mixed linear model was built to identify predictors of the fluctuation of anti-D1 antibody titers over time.

Results

In this longitudinal study, 230 patients with anti-D1 tested at 4 time points were included (Table 1). Patients with thrombotic APS had anti-D1 titers significantly higher than those without thrombosis (p=0.022). Among 135 patients with at least one anti-D1 positive result, anti-D1 titers varied significantly over time (Friedman statistics: 508.5, p<0.0001; anti-D1 geometric mean at baseline 189.0; T1 132.3 [-15%]; T2 113.8 [-17%]; T3 109.2 [-6% versus T2, -38% versus T1]). Anti-D1 titers were significantly higher at baseline compared to T3 (p=0.029). In the 4 years of follow-up, 18 new thrombotic events occurred. Patients with double/triple aPL positivity displayed 12.5 fold increase [95%CI 7.4-20.0] in baseline anti-D1 titers. After adjustment for age, gender and number of positive aPL tests, the fluctuation of anti-D1 titers was associated with treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at each time-point. In particular, treatment with HCQ, but not those with conventional immunosuppressors, was associated with a 1.3-fold decrease in anti-D1 titers [95%CI 1.1-1.5]. In the same multivariable model, incident vascular events were associated with a 1.5 fold increase of anti-D1 titers. A concomitant diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus did not affect the fluctuation of anti-D1 titers.

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of 230 APS ACTION Registry Patients with anti-D1 tested ≥3 time points during the follow-up

Anti-D1 pos samplesAnti-D1 neg samplesp-valueOverall sample(n=135)(n=95)(n=230)Age [years] mean (SD)42.3 (11.8)48.8 (13.0)0.000145.0 (12.7)%Female (n)71.9 (97)65.3 (62)0.35869.1 (159)Associated systemic autoimmune disease39.3 (53)44.2 (42)0.53941.3 (95)aPL without APS19.3 (26)34.7 (33)0.01025.7 (59)Thrombotic APS54.1 (73)53.7 (51)53.9 (124)Obstetric APS11.9 (16)5.3 (5)9.1 (21)Thrombotic/+obstetric APS14.8 (20)6.3 (6)11.3 (26)aCL IgG89.5 (119/133)25.5 (24/94)<0.000163.0 (143/227)aCL, IgM36.1 (48/133)27.7 (26/94)0.23432.6 (74/227)Anti-2GPI, IgG93.2 (124/133)39.4 (37/94)<0.000170.9 (161/227)Anti-2GPI, IgM34.6 (46/133)21.3 (20/94)0.04329.1 (66/227)LA82.8 (82/99)59.5 (44/74)0.00172.8 (126/173)

Conclusion

Treatment with HCQ and vascular events during follow-up were identified as significant predictors of the fluctuation of anti-D1 antibody titers over time.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

POS0664 RADIOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND ESTIMATED BASELINE YEARLY PROGRESSION ≥5 OR <5: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF TWO PHASE 3 TRIALS OF FILGOTINIB

Background

In some patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), especially those with joint damage early in the disease, first-line methotrexate (MTX) treatment may not suffice to prevent further rapid radiographic progression (RRP).1 In FINCH 1 (NCT02889796), filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) and 100 mg (FIL100) reduced change in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) vs placebo (PBO) in pts with RA and inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR).2 In FINCH 3 (NCT02886728), FIL200 and FIL100 reduced change in mTSS vs MTX monotherapy (MTX mono) in MTX-naïve pts.3

Objectives

To evaluate, via post hoc analysis of 2 trials, filgotinib’s effects on radiographic progression vs MTX mono in pts with estimated baseline (BL) yearly progression ≥5 or <5 mTSS units/year.

Methods

The double-blind 52-week (W) FINCH 1 study randomised MTX-IR pts with moderate–severe active RA to FIL200 or FIL100, subcutaneous adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg, or PBO; at W24, PBO pts were rerandomised blinded to FIL200 or FIL100; all took stable background MTX.2 In FINCH 3, MTX-naïve pts were randomised, blinded, to FIL200 + MTX, FIL100 + MTX, FIL200 alone, or MTX mono for up to W52.3 This analysis examined subgroups by estimated BL yearly progression (BL mTSS/duration in years of RA diagnosis), based on ≥5 or <5 mTSS units/year,4 a threshold commonly used to define RRP. We assessed effects of filgotinib vs ADA or PBO in mTSS change from BL (CFB) at W24/W52 (using a mixed model for repeated measures) and percentages with no W24 progression (mTSS change ≤0, ≤0.5, ≤smallest detectable change [SDC], using Fisher’s exact test).

Results

At BL, 558/1755 MTX-IR and 787/1249 MTX-naïve pts had BL estimated yearly progression ≥5. Median mTSS in pts with BL yearly progression ≥5 and <5 was 53.25 vs 5.00 respectively in the MTX-IR trial and 6.00 vs 2.50 in the MTX-naïve trial. At W24, the mTSS CFB in pts with BL yearly progression ≥5 and <5 was 0.84 and 0.22 in MTX-IR pts taking PBO + MTX, and 0.67 and 0.25 in MTX-naïve pts taking MTX mono. At W52, in pts with BL yearly progression ≥5, FIL200 + MTX reduced mTSS change vs PBO + MTX in the MTX-IR trial and vs MTX mono in the MTX-naïve trial (Figure 1). At W24, among pts with estimated BL yearly progression ≥5, FIL200 + MTX increased odds of no progression (≤0.5 or ≤0) vs PBO + MTX in MTX-IR pts and vs MTX mono in MTX-naïve pts (Table 1).

Table 1.

Ratio of no radiographic progression at W24

FINCH 1: MTX-IRFIL200 + MTXFIL100 + MTXADA + MTXPBO + MTXBL yearly progression≥5(n = 138)<5(n = 267)≥5(n = 139)<5(n = 265)≥5(n = 91)<5(n = 180)≥5(n = 101)<5(n = 250)% with no progression (≤0.5)87.797.088.592.587.993.976.291.6OR2.22*2.97*2.40*1.12††††% with no progression (≤0)80.491.881.388.380.289.467.386.4OR2.00*1.752.11*1.19††††% with no progression (≤SDC [1.36])91.398.192.196.692.395.681.294.0OR2.43*3.35*2.70*1.82††††FINCH 3: MTX-naïveFIL200 + MTXFIL100 + MTXFIL200 monoMTXBL yearly progression≥5<5≥5<5≥5<5≥5<5(n = 221)(n = 134)(n = 121)(n = 63)(n = 115)(n = 58)(n = 224)(n = 132)% with no progression (≤0.5)86.994.083.593.789.689.778.687.9OR1.81*2.171.382.032.34*1.20††% with no progression (≤0)78.783.672.784.180.087.967.980.3OR1.75*1.251.261.31.89*1.79††% with no progression (≤SDC [1.53])93.797.891.796.895.796.689.395.5OR1.772.081.331.452.641.33††

MTX-IR ORs are FIL vs PBO + MTX; MTX-naïve are FIL vs MTX. *Nominal P<.05. †Not applicable.

ADA, adalimumab; FIL, filgotinib; IR, inadequate response; mTSS, modified total Sharp score; MTX, methotrexate; OR, odds ratio; SDC, smallest detectable change; W, week.

Conclusion

These data suggest filgotinib’s inhibition of radiographic progression was numerically greater than MTX monotherapy in RA pts with high estimated BL yearly progression. In those with a more moderate estimated rate of progression, filgotinib suppressed progression comparably to ADA and/or MTX.

References

[1]Smolen J et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1566–1572.

[2]Combe B et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:848–858.

[3]Westhovens R et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:727–738.

[4]Vastesaeger N et al. Rheumatology. 2009;48:1114–1121.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Medical writing support was provided by Rob Coover, MPH, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA; and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Funding for this analysis was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. The sponsors participated in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the research.

Disclosure of Interests

Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Behringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and YL Biologics, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Kowa, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Tatsuya Atsumi Paid instructor for: Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Mitsubishi Tanabe; Chugai; Astellas Pharma; Takeda; Pfizer; AbbVie: Eisai; Daiichi Sankyo; Bristol-Myers Squibb; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and Alexion Inc., Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Mitsubishi Tanabe; Chugai; Astellas Pharma; Takeda; Pfizer; AbbVie: Eisai; Daiichi Sankyo; Bristol-Myers Squibb; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and Alexion Inc., Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: AbbVie; Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Medac; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sandoz; and Sanofi/Genzyme; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and UCB, Consultant of: Janssen; AbbVie; Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Medac; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sandoz; and Sanofi/Genzyme, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche, Robert B.M. Landewé Paid instructor for: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos NV, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos NV, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Beatrix Bartok Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc, Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Zhaoyu Yin Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ling Han Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Kahaku Emoto Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences K.K., Shungo Kano Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences K.K., Vijay Rajendran Employee of: Galapagos BV, Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer Japan, Sanofi, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., Consultant of: Astellas, Chugai, and Eli Lilly Japan, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Shionogi, Takeda, and UCB Japan

POS0697 SAFETY OF BELIMUMAB IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: A LARGE INTEGRATED SAFETY ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL DATA

Background:

Belimumab (BEL), a monoclonal antibody that antagonizes B-lymphocyte stimulator, was first approved in 2011 for active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). BEL has been studied for over 10 years; and while safety data from individual trials have been informative, a large integrated safety analysis has not yet been conducted.

Objectives:

Perform pooled analyses to evaluate the safety of BEL in adult patients with SLE.

Methods:

Aggregate analyses were performed using safety data for patients ≥18 years of age pooled from six randomised, placebo (PBO)-controlled BEL clinical trials (GSK studies: LBSL02, 110752, 110751, 112341, 113750, and 115471). Patients from GSK studies LBSL02, 110752, and 110751 received intravenous (IV) BEL 1, 4 (LBSL02 only), or 10 mg/kg, or PBO on Days 1, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter. Patients from GSK studies 113750 and 115471 received IV BEL 10 mg/kg or PBO on Days 1, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter. Patients from GSK study 112341 received subcutaneous (SC) BEL 200 mg, or PBO weekly. Safety analyses included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), severe AEs, AEs of special interest (AESI), and mortality of BEL (all doses and formulations combined) vs PBO at Week 52.

Results:

The pooled analysis included 4170 patients. Overall, 81.0% (n=2280/2815) of patients receiving BEL and 76.6% (n=1038/1355) of patients receiving PBO completed their respectively enrolled study; the most common reason for withdrawal was occurrence of an AE in both groups. The majority of patients were female (BEL: 94.5%; PBO: 93.6%), the mean age in both groups was 38 years, and baseline characteristics (race, SLE duration, disease activity, SLE damage, complement levels, anti-dsDNA binding, SLE medication usage) were similar between treatments.

The incidence of patients experiencing ≥1 AE, ≥1 SAE, and mortality was similar across treatments (Table 1); the most commonly reported SAEs in both groups were infections and infestations (BEL: 5.4% [n=151/2815]; PBO: 5.9% [n=80/1355]). The mean duration of treatment exposure was similar between groups (BEL: 334.1 days; PBO: 325.3 days).

A greater proportion of patients experienced AESI with BEL vs PBO for post-infusion/injection systemic reactions (from IV or SC administration) and depression/suicide/self-injury (Table 1). The proportion of patients experiencing an AESI of infections and malignancies was similar between groups.

Conclusion:

Consistent with individual studies, BEL demonstrated a similar safety profile to PBO in this large integrated safety analysis of six trials. These results support a positive benefit–risk profile of BEL in the treatment of adult SLE.

Funding:

GSK

Table 1.

Pooled AE data

N (%)PBO (IV + SC)N=1355BEL (IV + SC)N=2815AE1184 (87.4)2440 (86.7)SAE230 (17.0)421 (15.0)Severe AE (severe or life threatening)209 (15.4)377 (13.4)AE resulting in study drug discontinuation109 (8.0)184 (6.5)Death6 (0.4)16 (0.6)AESIPost-infusion/injection systemic reactions*110 (8.1)286 (10.2)Serious2 (0.1)13 (0.5)All infections of special interest (OIs, HZ, TB, sepsis)97 (7.2)173 (6.1)Serious17 (1.3)40 (1.4)All OIs92 (6.8)157 (5.6)Active TB5 (0.4)4 (0.1)All HZ59 (4.4)106 (3.8)All sepsis10 (0.7)20 (0.7)Malignancies excluding NMSC2 (0.1)8 (0.3)Including NMSC3 (0.2)12 (0.4)Depression (inc. mood disorders and anxiety)/suicide/self-injury92 (6.8)210 (7.5)Serious5 (0.4)9 (0.3)

*Occurring on or within 3 days of infusion/injection date.

HZ, herpes zoster; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; OIs, opportunistic infections; TB, tuberculosis

Acknowledgements:

Medical writing assistance was provided by Helen Taylor, Fishawack Indicia Ltd., UK, part of Fishawack Health, and was funded by GSK.

Disclosure of Interests:

Daniel J. Wallace Speakers bureau: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Tatsuya Atsumi Speakers bureau: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK, Mark Daniels Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Anne Hammer Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paige Meizlik Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Holly Quasny Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Andreas Schwarting Speakers bureau: Novartis, Roche, GSK, Pfizer, Amgen, Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, GSK, Actelion, Fengchun Zhang: None declared, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

POS0863 DIFFERENTIATING THE DOMINANCE OF PULMONARY VASCULAR DISEASE OR INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE ON HEMODYNAMIC ABNORMALITIES IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS AND CLARIFYING EACH CHARACTERISTIC BY USING QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF CHEST CT

Background:

Group 1 and 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) develop through different pathological mechanisms but have similar hemodynamic abnormalities. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with both pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), making it challenging to differentiate group 1 and 3 PH in those patients. A previous study using quantitative evaluation of chest computed tomography (CT) demonstrated that normal lung volume was inversely correlated with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) in patients with group 3 PH (1).

Objectives:

In this study, we aimed to assess the dominance of PVD or ILD in SSc patients by quantitative evaluation of chest CT and to evaluate each characteristic.

Methods:

A total of 76 SSc patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. Chest CT was evaluated by using a software (Synapse Vincent Ver.3.0, Fujifilm) which quantified normal and total area of the lung. Then, we calculated abnormal area by drawing normal area from total area in the lung (%). Pulmonary function test (PFT) and serum biomarkers, such as KL-6 and LDH, were also evaluated. The dominance of PVD or ILD was defined as divergent or parallel change between the first and last assessments, respectively, in mPAP and abnormal area in the lung calculated using the software. Increase or decrease by over 10% in the last assessment compared to the first assessment was considered as a significant change in mPAP or abnormal area in the lung. P values were calculated by Mann-Whitney U test, and correlation coefficients were calculated by direct regression variance.

Results:

The median [range] values of mPAP and abnormal area in the lung at baseline were 23 [9-65] mmHg and 30.2 [0-100] %, respectively. Of 37 SSc and PH patients, 18 were defined as having PVD dominance while 19 as ILD dominance. Abnormal area in the lung at baseline was greater in patients with ILD dominance compared to those with PVD dominance (39.1 [16.3-98.3] v.s. 14.0 [0-99] %, p=0.002), whereas mPAP was higher in patients with PVD dominance than those with ILD dominance (42.5 [23.0-65.0] v.s. 26.0 [16.0-42.0] mmHg, p=0.002). PFT parameters including forced vital capacity were not different between the two groups. The ratio of mPAP/KL-6 showed a great difference between the two groups with its significant elevation in patients with PVD dominance (p=0.007).

Conclusion:

Quantitative evaluation of chest CT showed great efficiency in differentiating the dominance of PVD or ILD in patients with SSc and PH. In addition, the ratio of mPAP/KL-6 may easily be used as a parameter for dominance evaluation.

References:

[1]Iwasawa T, Kato S, Ogura T, Kusakawa Y, Iso S, Baba T, et al. Low-normal lung volume correlates with pulmonary hypertension in fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: computer-aided 3D quantitative analysis of chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(2):W166-73.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0249 SAFETY OF BARICITINIB IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA): THE 2020 INTERIM REPORT FROM ALL-CASE POST MARKETING SURVEILLANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

An all-case post marketing surveillance (PMS) of baricitinib (Bari), that started in Sep 2017, collects safety and effectiveness for the first 24 wks of treatment and continues to collect serious adverse events (SAEs) for 3 yrs.

Objectives:

To evaluate Bari safety in RA patients (pt) in clinical practice.

Methods:

We report pt baseline demographics and adverse events (AEs) up to 24 wks for pts whose case report files for 24-wk data were completed as of Jun 2020.

Results:

Data from 3445 pts were analyzed (females=80%, mean age=64yr, mean RA duration 12yr). Bari dose regimen was as follows: 4mg, 60%, 2mg, 27%, 4mg→2mg, 5%, 2mg→4mg, 5%, and others, 2%. Concomitant use of MTX and glucocorticoid was 65% and 48%, respectively. 74% continued treatment for 24 wks. AE and SAE were recognized in 887 (26%) and 122 pts (4%), respectively. 6 pts died of pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, cerebral infarction/ILD/aspiration pneumonia, adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. Major AEs were as follows: herpes zoster=3%, liver dysfunction=3%, serious infection=1%, anemia=1%, hyperlipidemia=1%, malignancy=0.3%, interstitial pneumonia=0.2%, MACE=0.1%, and VTE=0.1%.

Conclusion:

Data do not show new safety concerns and encourage guideline-compliant use of Bari.

Disclosure of Interests:

Takao Fujii Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Consultant of: Asahikasei Pharma Corp, Grant/research support from: Asahikasei Pharma Corp; AbbVie Japan GK; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co. Ltd; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tatsuya Atsumi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie Japan GK; AstraZeneca plc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd.; Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd.; Novartis Pharma K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., Alexion Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Pfizer Japan Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nami Okamoto Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Asahikasei Pharma Co.; AYUMI Pharmaceutical Co.

Eisai Co. Ltd; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.

Sanofi K.K.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Novartis Pharma Co.; Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nobunori Takahashi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Naoto Tamura Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Glaxo Smith Kline K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Novartis Pharma Co., Atsuo Nakajima: None declared, Ayako Nakajima Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan Ltd., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd.,Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Glaxo Smith Kline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Grant/research support from: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Hiroaki Matsuno Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Consultant of: Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K, Naoto Tsujimoto Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Atsushi Nishikawa Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Taeko Ishii Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Eisai Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Novartis Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Sanofi K.K.; UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma, Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Eisai Co., Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Pfizer Japan Inc., Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Asahikasei Pharma Corp., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., DNA Chip Research Inc.; Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma Inc., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.; Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Michiaki Takagi Speakers bureau: Yes, but sponsored lectures without COI in the academic meetings, only.

OP0249 LONG-TERM EXTENSION RESULTS OF RISE-SSC, A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF RIOCIGUAT IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

RISE-SSc (NCT02283762) was a multicenter Phase IIb trial of riociguat in pts with early (duration ≤18 months) dcSSc and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) 10−22 units. Pts were randomized double-blind to placebo or riociguat 0.5–2.5 mg t.i.d. for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint, mRSS change from baseline to Week (Wk) 52, did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08, riociguat vs placebo), but there were favorable trends in some other outcomes.

Objectives:

To present open-label long-term extension (LTE) results of RISE-SSc.

Methods:

Pts who completed Wk 52 of double-blind therapy could enter LTE on riociguat. Endpoints included mRSS, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs).

Results:

Of 60 pts randomized to riociguat and 61 to placebo, 42 (riociguat−riociguat group) and 45 (former placebo group), respectively, entered LTE. At LTE start, mean±SD mRSS was 16.4±3.2 and 16.3±4.2 units, and mean disease duration was 8.9±7.8 and 8.9±5.8 months, in the riociguat−riociguat and former placebo groups, respectively. Other demographics/disease characteristics were also comparable. Median duration of riociguat treatment was 1092 d in riociguat−riociguat pts and 649 d in former placebo pts. Throughout the study, mRSS decreased in both groups (Figure 1). From Wk 52 to last visit, mRSS fell by −3.02±5.51 in riociguat−riociguat patients and −3.96±5.43 in former placebo pts. Rates of mRSS regression (decrease by >5 units and ≥25% from Wk 52 to last visit) and of % declines in mRSS were similar in the two groups (Figure 2). mRSS progression (increase by >5 units and ≥25% from Wk 52 to last visit) occurred in 1 pt (2%) in each group. During the entire study, rescue therapy agents were used in 15 (36%) riociguat−riociguat pts and 17 (38%) former placebo pts. AEs were reported from Wk 52 to last visit in 82 pts (94%): 40 (95%) riociguat−riociguat and 42 (93%) former placebo. Most common AEs overall: nasopharyngitis (24%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (17%), diarrhea (15%), and hypotension (14%). AEs of special interest (dizziness, postural dizziness, or hypotension) occurred in 5 riociguat−riociguat pts (12%) and 4 former placebo pts (9%). SAEs were reported in 21 (24%) pts: 10 (24%) riociguat−riociguat pts and 11 (24%) former placebo pts, with no SAE reported in >1 patient, no SAEs of special interest, and no deaths.

Conclusion:

During LTE riociguat treatment, mRSS decreased in both groups from Wk 52 onwards and mRSS progression was uncommon. Riociguat had acceptable safety, similar to the main study, with no new safety signal.

Acknowledgments:

RISE-SSc was jointly funded by Bayer AG and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos, Grant/research support from: NIH NIAID, NIH NIAMS, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Corbus, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB Pharma, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Masataka Kuwana Grant/research support from: Acetelion, Consultant of: Acetelion, Bayer, Chugai, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring and Reata Pharmaceuticals. He was a member of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee (Boehringer Ingelheim), Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: BMS, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, BMS, BI, Melanie Wosnitza Employee of: Bayer AG, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Gabriella Szücs: None declared, Wendy Stevens: None declared, Viginia Steen Grant/research support from: The associated affiliation has received grants/research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Eicos, Galapagos, Immune Tolerance Network, Reata, Consultant of: Virginia Steen has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Eicos, Forbius, Chiara Stagnaro: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Richard Silver: None declared, Elena Schiopu: None declared, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Frank Kramer Employee of: Bayer AG, Sindhu Johnson Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria, Osamu Ishikawa: None declared, Tomonori Ishii: None declared, Eric Hachlla: None declared, Ellen De Langhe Consultant of: member of advisory board for Boehringer, László Czirják Consultant of: Actelion, BI, Roche-Genentech, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer AG, Radim Bečvář Consultant of: Actelion, Roche, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche

THU0232 INTERFERON SIGNATURE IN LUPUS KIDNEY IS CORRELATED WITH REMISSION WITHIN 56 WEEKS

Background:

Activation of the type I interferon (IFN) pathway has been implicated in the initiation of systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) and most SLE patients show increased expression of IFN-regulated genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells or whole blood. However, the IFN signature in lupus kidney is not well examined especially at single cell resolution.

Objectives:

To clarify the significance of the IFN signature in lupus kidney at single cell resolution

Methods:

18 lupus kidney (LN) and 34 transplanted kidney (KTx) samples were included in the study. Residual frozen kidney biopsies were collected after clinical diagnosis. The tissue from one donor was split into two. One portion was used for total RNA-Seq (tRNA-Seq) by SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 - Pico Input Mammalian (Takara/Clontech). The rest was used for single nucleus RNA-Seq (snRNA-Seq) using Chromium Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kits v3 (10x Genomics) (7 LN and 17 KTx). For the tRNA-Seq, the sequence reads were aligned to Ensembl genome annotation (Ens93) by STAR and the aligned reads were counted by htseq. IFN score of tRNA-Seq was calculated using the reported method [1] per each module (M1.2, M3.4 and M5.12). For the snRNA-Seq, the sequenced reads were processed on the standard pipeline of CellRanger (10x Genomics) and the data was visualized using Seurat. IFN score of snRNA-Seq was computed by the method reported by Arazi A,et al[2].

Clinical outcomes of LN were examined on the medical records retrospectively and the clinical remission in 56 weeks for LN was defined as a urinary protein/creatinine ratio less than 0.5 g/gCr.

Results:

11 LN had clinical remission and 7 LN showed non remitted disease within 56 weeks after the biopsy. There were no statistical significance co-variants such as age, gender and WHO class in pathology. IFN score of M1.2, M3.4 and M5.12 were significantly increased in LN with remission within 56 weeks (median 0.773 vs 0.659, 0.595 vs 0.243 and 0.415 vs 0.100: p-value 0.03, 0.01 and 0.02 [Wilcox rank-test]) in tRNA-Seq. In the snRNA-Seq, the lupus kidney with low IFN score showed restricted IFN signature in the endothelial cells mainly, which can be detected even in the controls, but those with high IFN score indicated broadly spread IFN signature among all of the cell types.

Conclusion:

LN with high IFN score in kidney tissue is correlated with remission within 56 weeks. LN with low IFN score showed IFN signature restricted to endothelial cells but those with a higher IFN score revealed broadly affected cell types with IFN signature. These results suggest that the IFN signature of LN may start from endothelial cells and then spread to the whole kidney.

References:

[1]Chiche L, Jourde-Chiche N, Whalen E,et al.Modular Transcriptional Repertoire Analyses of Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Reveal Distinct Type I and Type II Interferon Signatures.Arthritis & Rheumatology2014;66:1583–95.doi:10.1002/art.38628

[2]Arazi A, Rao DA, Berthier CC,et al.The immune cell landscape in kidneys of patients with lupus nephritis.Nat Immunol2019;20:902–14.

doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0398-x

Disclosure of Interests: :

Masatoshi Kanda: None declared, Takahiro Tsuji: None declared, Masaya Mukai: None declared, Hiroki Takahashi: None declared, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Norbert Hübner: None declared

FRI0115 FILGOTINIB PROVIDED RAPID AND SUSTAINED IMPROVEMENTS IN FUNCTIONAL STATUS, PAIN, AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE, AND REDUCED FATIGUE OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS WHO ARE METHOTREXATE-NAÏVE: RESULTS FROM THE FINCH 3 STUDY

Background:

In the FINCH 3 study, filgotinib (FIL)—a potent, selective, oral small molecule Janus kinase 1 inhibitor1—in combination with methotrexate (MTX), demonstrated significant improvements in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vs MTX alone in patients (pts) who were MTX-naïve.2For pts with RA, rapid control of pain and fatigue along with maintenance of physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important outcomes of their care.3Thus, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can provide physicians with evidence to guide treatment decisions beyond the guideline-recommended treatment targets of reducing immune inflammation to prevent joint damage, physical disability, and mortality.4

Objectives:

To evaluate the rate and magnitude of change in PROs assessing functional status, pain, HRQoL, and fatigue from FINCH 3.

Methods:

In the FINCH 3 study (NCT02886728), pts with active RA who were MTX-naïve received FIL 200 mg daily + MTX, FIL 100 mg + MTX, FIL 200 mg (+ placebo [PBO]), or MTX (+ PBO) for up to 52 weeks. PROs were recorded prospectively and included HAQ-DI (functional status) and VAS pain scale (day 1, week [W]2, W4, W8, W12, W16, W20, W24, W30, W36, W44, W52), SF-36 (HRQoL), and FACIT-Fatigue (day 1, W4, W12, W24, W36, W52). The least squares mean of the change from baseline (CFB) at each time point up to W52 and p values (each FIL arm vs MTX) were analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. For HAQ-DI, the proportion of pts who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID; reduction ≥0.22) between each FIL arm and MTX was analysed using logistic regression analysis. P values for the comparisons of PROs were not adjusted for multiplicity, except for HAQ-DI CFB at W24 for FIL 200 mg + MTX and FIL 100 mg + MTX vs MTX.

Results:

Of the 1249 pts randomised and treated (FIL 200 mg + MTX, n = 416; FIL 100 mg + MTX, n = 207; FIL 200 mg, n = 210; MTX, n = 416), 1025 (82.1%) completed the study. Compared with MTX alone, a nominally significantly greater CFB in functional status and pain from W2 to W24 was observed in all FIL arms; the benefit was sustained from W30 to W52 (Fig 1). By W2, a nominally significantly greater proportion of pts achieved the HAQ-DI MCID or greater (≥0.22) in all FIL arms (FIL 200 mg + MTX: 61.9%, p <0.001; FIL 100 mg + MTX: 58.5%, p <0.001; FIL 200 mg: 53.9%, p = 0.004) compared with MTX (42.2%). By W8, ≥72% of pts in all FIL arms vs 63% of pts in the MTX arm achieved the HAQ-DI MCID; a numerically greater proportion of pts in FIL arms vs MTX achieved HAQ-DI MCID through W52. SF-36 physical component summary and FACIT-Fatigue scores were nominally significantly improved with FIL treatment vs MTX alone at various time points (Fig 2A, B). Improvements in SF-36 mental component summary scores were nominally significant for pts in all FIL arms vs MTX alone as early as W4, and the CFB reached at W12 for FIL arms was generally sustained up to W52 (Fig 2A).

Conclusion:

For pts with moderate to severe RA who were MTX-naïve, FIL—with or without concomitant MTX—led to more rapid and sustained improvements in functional status, pain, fatigue, and HRQoL, compared with MTX alone.

References:

[1]Van Rompaey, et al.J Immunol. 2013;131:3568–77.

[2]Westhovens, et al.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71 (suppl 10):1606–8.

[3]Fautrel B, et al.Rheumatol Int.2018;38:935–47.

[4]Smolen JS, et al.Ann Rheum Dis.2017;76:960–77.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rieke Alten Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Galapagos, Galapagos NV, Gilead, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, William Rigby Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Zhaoyu Yin Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ken Hasegawa Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Thijs Hendrikx Shareholder of: Galapagos (share/warrant holder), Employee of: Galapagos, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Rene Westhovens Grant/research support from: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Consultant of: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Speakers bureau: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead

FRI0575 BIOMARKER ANALYSIS FROM THE RISE-SSC STUDY OF RIOCIGUAT IN EARLY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

RISE-SSc (NCT02283762) was a multicenter, double-blind, Phase IIb study of riociguat in early dcSSc. Primary endpoint was change in mRSS from baseline to Wk 52.

Objectives:

Exploratory, descriptive analyses of riociguat target engagement and effects on disease biomarkers in RISE-SSc and their relationship with effects on the primary endpoint. All biomarker p-values are for information only.

Methods:

Pts with dcSSc (duration ≤18 mo; modified Rodnan skin score [mRSS] 10–22 units) were randomized to riociguat 0.5−2.5 mg tid (n=60) or placebo (n=61). Biomarkers of target engagement (cGMP), inflammation and/or vascular/endothelial function (e.g. high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP], soluble platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 [sPECAM-1], soluble E-selectin, chemokine ligand 4 [CXCL-4]), and fibrosis (e.g. alpha-smooth muscle cell actin [alphaSMA], pro-collagen mRNA expression) were measured in plasma, serum, and skin biopsies at baseline and Wk 14.

Results:

Mean±SD change from baseline in mRSS was –2.09±5.66 (n=57) with riociguat and –0.77±8.24 (n=52) with placebo (p=0.08). From baseline to Wk 14, plasma cGMP rose by mean (SD) 94% (78%) (n=52) with riociguat and 10% (39%) (n=52) with placebo (nominal p<0.001). Serum sPECAM-1 and CXCL-4 fell with riociguat vs placebo; changes in hsCRP or E-selectin differed little between groups (Fig 1). Pts with higher baseline sPECAM-1 showed larger mRSS reductions with riociguat vs placebo than pts with lower levels (nominal interaction p=0.004). In baseline skin biopsies, 34% and 31% of pts in the riociguat and placebo groups, respectively, had no alphaSMA-positive cells; other pts had +ve cells (alphaSMA counts 0.1–99.5, median 2.5), a potential indicator of higher disease activity. Pts with +ve baseline alphaSMA counts showed a reduction of mRSS with riociguat vs placebo (Fig 2). Skin collagen mRNA expression biomarkers in skin biopsies showed no differences between groups.

Conclusion:

Primary study endpoint (change in mRSS) was not met. Plasma cGMP rose with riociguat, confirming engagement with the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway. Serum sPECAM-1 (marker of endothelial activation) and CXCL-4 (marker of progressive SSc) fell with riociguat; hsCRP and E-selectin did not. Some serum and skin biomarkers of higher disease activity at baseline were associated with a greater effect of riociguat on skin fibrosis.

Acknowledgments:

RISE-SSc was jointly funded by Bayer AG and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche, Frank Kramer Employee of: Bayer AG, Josef Höfler Employee of: Josef Höfler is an employee of Staburo GmbH, Munich, Germany, contracted by Bayer AG to perform the biomarker analyses, Mercedeh Ghadessi Employee of: Bayer AG, Peter Sandner Employee of: Bayer AG, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: BMS, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, BMS, BI, Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Masataka Kuwana Grant/research support from: Acetelion, Consultant of: Acetelion, Bayer, Chugai, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring and Reata Pharmaceuticals. He was a member of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee (Boehringer Ingelheim), Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Radim Bečvář Consultant of: Actelion, Roche, László Czirják Consultant of: Actelion, BI, Roche-Genentech, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer AG, Ellen De Langhe Consultant of: member of advisory board for Boehringer, Eric Hachlla: None declared, Tomonori Ishii: None declared, Osamu Ishikawa: None declared, Sindhu Johnson Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria, Kaisa Laapas Employee of: Partly in-sourced to Bayer, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Elena Schiopu: None declared, Richard Silver: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Chiara Stagnaro: None declared, Viginia Steen Grant/research support from: The associated affiliation has received grants/research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Eicos, Galapagos, Immune Tolerance Network, Reata, Consultant of: Virginia Steen has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Eicos, Forbius, Wendy Stevens: None declared, Gabriella Szücs: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Melanie Wosnitza Employee of: Bayer AG, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc./Civi Biopharma, Inc., Grant/research support from: Dr Khanna was supported by NIH/NIAMS K24AR063120, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutic, Galapagos, Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB

SAT0057 PREDICTING INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO JAK INHIBITORS BY CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have dramatically altered outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there remains some proportion of patients who respond to inadequately JAKi treatment (JAKi-IR) [1,2]. The characteristics in RA patients associated with JAKi-IR have not been fully demonstrated.

Objectives:

To clarify the characteristics of JAKi-IR in patients with RA by cluster analysis.

Methods:

This retrospective study comprised 120 RA patients who were treated with JAKi (Tofacitinib or Baricitinib) between July 2013 and September 2019 in five facilities. The disease status at the baseline, at 12 weeks after JAKi treatment and at the time point of withdrawing JAKi was assessed using the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria. JAKi-IR was defined as follows, primary non-response at 12 weeks after JAKi treatment: withdrawal of JAKi with ACR20 non-response or non-improvement in DAS28-CRP (ΔDAS28-CRP<1.2 from baseline), secondary non-response: withdrawal of JAKi without clinical remission after 12 weeks. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed with the following variables: gender, age, disease duration, bone erosion, ACR functional classification (Class ≥3), comcomitant rheumatoid arthritis related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) or other autoimmune disease (AID), anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity, rheumatoid factor (RF) at baseline, use/dose of methotrexate (MTX) and prednisolone (PSL), serum ESR/CRP, tender/swollen joint counts (TJC/SJC), visual analog scale by patients (VAS-Pt), and prior of biologic DMARDs.

Results:

The 120 enrolled patients were classified into 4 groups by cluster analysis(Figure1), The characteristics of each group are as follows, Group A(n=21): female + bone erosion + RF/ACPA positive + AID + MTX non-user, Group B(n=36): male + older age + RA-ILD + RF/ACPA positive + MTX non-user, Group C(n=35): RF/ACPA positive + absence of RA-ILD + MTX user, Group D (n=28): seronegative + MTX user + absence of RA-ILD + history of biologic DMARDs failure. The rate of JAKi-IR was A:9%, B:8%, C:20%, D:32%, and the significant difference between Group B and D was identified (p=0.02). In multiple comparison of 4 groups, no significant difference was identified (p=0.06) (Figure2).

Conclusion:

JAKi-IR would be more likely to be seronegative, MTX use, absence of RA-ILD and history of biologic DMARDs failure. Cluster analysis is an exploratory tool that aids in the analysis of huge amount of data.

References:

[1] Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Yamaoka K, Arai S, Toyoizumi S, DeMasi R, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis by background methotrexate dose: A post hoc analysis of clinical trial data. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(5):756-66.

[2] Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Amano K, Harigai M, Ishii T, Kawaguchi O, et al. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Subgroup analyses of four multinational phase 3 randomized trials. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;28(4):583-91.

Disclosure of Interests:

Masanari Sugawara: None declared, Yuichiro Fujieda: None declared, Atsushi Noguchi: None declared, Shun Tanimura: None declared, Yuka Shimizu: None declared, Ikuma Nakagawa: None declared, Michihito Kono: None declared, Masaru Kato: None declared, Kenji Oku: None declared, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc.

SAT0158 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FILGOTINIB IN METHOTREXATE-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: FINCH 3 52-WEEK RESULTS

Background:

Filgotinib (FIL) is a potent, selective JAK 1 inhibitor. FINCH 3 assessed FIL efficacy and safety in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); week (W)24 primary outcome results were previously presented.1

Objectives:

To report FINCH 3 (NCT02886728) results through W52.

Methods:

This global, phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled study randomised MTX-naïve pts with moderately to severely active RA 2:1:1:2 to oral FIL 200 mg once daily + MTX ≤20 mg weekly, FIL 100 mg + MTX, FIL 200 mg monotherapy (mono) + placebo (PBO), or PBO + MTX up to W52. Comparisons at W52 were not adjusted for multiplicity. Safety was assessed from adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.

Results:

Of 1249 treated pts, 975 received study drug through W52. FIL efficacy was sustained up to W52. Treatment with FIL + MTX or FIL mono increased proportions of pts achieving ACR20/50/70 and clinical disease remission by DAS28(CRP) <2.6 (FIL 200 mg + MTX, 53%; FIL mono, 46%), CDAI, SDAI, and Boolean criteria; improved HAQ-DI; and halted radiographic progression vs MTX alone (Table 1 andFigure). Safety was consistent with W24 data (Table 2).

Table 1.

Efficacy outcomes at week 52

FIL 200 mg + MTX (n = 416)FIL 100 mg + MTX (n = 207)FIL 200 mg(n = 210)MTX(n = 416)ACR20, %75.0***73.4**74.8***61.8ACR50, %62.3***59.4**61.4**48.3ACR70, %47.8***40.1*45.2***29.8mTSSa0.21***0.27*0.23**0.74HAQ-DIb−1.00***−0.97−0.95*−0.88

aLeast-squares mean change from baseline.

bMean change from baseline.

*, p <0.05;**, p <0.01;***, p <0.001 vs MTX alone; not adjusted for multiplicity.

FIL, filgotinib; mTSS, van der Heijde modified total Sharp score; MTX, methotrexate.

Table 2.

Safety outcomes through week 52

Event, n (%)FIL 200 mg + MTX(n = 416)FIL 100 mg + MTX(n = 207)FIL 200 mg(n = 210)MTX(n = 416)All AEs318 (76.4)164 (79.2)143 (68.1)305 (73.3)Serious AEs26 (6.3)13 (6.3)17 (8.1)28 (6.7)Infection148 (35.6)76 (36.7)75 (35.7)157 (37.7)Serious infection5 (1.2)3 (1.4)5 (2.4)8 (1.9)Herpes zoster6 (1.4)3 (1.4)4 (1.9)4 (1.0)VTE0004 (1.0)MACE (adjudicated)4 (1.0)1 (0.5)2 (1.0)2 (0.5)Malignancya1 (0.2)004 (1.0)NMSC2 (0.5)001 (0.2)Death3 (0.7)b1 (0.5)c00

aExcluding NMSC.

b1 lupus cardiomyopathy, 1 atypical interstitial pneumonia, 1 non–treatment-emergent cardiovascular death.

cDissecting cerebral and vertebral aneurysm.

AE, adverse event; FIL, filgotinib; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MTX, methotrexate; NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Conclusion:

Efficacy of FIL 200 mg + MTX, FIL 100 mg + MTX, and FIL 200 mg mono was sustained through W52, with faster onset1and consistently numerically greater efficacy for FIL 200 vs 100 mg. No new safety signals were observed.

References:

[1]Westhovens, et al.Ann Rheum Dis.2019;78(Suppl2):259–60.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rene Westhovens Grant/research support from: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Consultant of: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Speakers bureau: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, William Rigby Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Daniel Ching Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Pfizer, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, William Stohl Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, Consultant of: Janssen Research & Development, Jonathan Kay Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Pfizer, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Consultant of: Alvotech Suisse AG; Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH; Celltrion Healthcare Co. Ltd.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; Mylan Inc.; Novartis AG; Samsung Bioepis; Sandoz, Inc; UCB, Inc., Arvind Chopra Grant/research support from: Zydus Pharamceutical Ltd India, Beatrix Bartok Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences Inc., Franziska Matzkies Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Zhaoyu Yin Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ying Guo Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Chantal Tasset Shareholder of: Galapagos (share/warrant holder), Employee of: Galapagos, John Sundy Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Angelika Jahreis Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Neelufar Mozaffarian Shareholder of: Gilead, Employee of: Gilead, Osvaldo Messina Speakers bureau: Amgen; Americas Health Foundation; Pfizer, Robert B.M. Landewé Consultant of: AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB Pharma, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Consultant of: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma

Complement profile in microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis: analysis using sera from a nationwide prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The complement cascade, especially the alternative pathway of complement, has been shown in basic research to be associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). We aimed to elucidate relationships between serum complement components and clinical characteristics in AAV.

METHOD

In a nationwide prospective cohort study (RemIT-JAV-RPGN), we measured the serum levels of C1q, C2, C3, C3b/iC3b, C4, C4b, C5, C5a, C9, factor B, factor D, factor H, factor I, mannose-binding lectin, and properdin in 52 patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and 39 patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).

RESULTS

The properdin level of MPA and GPA was significantly lower than that of healthy donors. The properdin level was negatively correlated with the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) (ρ = -0.2148, p = 0.0409). The factor D level at 6 months was significantly positively correlated with the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) at 6, 12, and 24 months (ρ = 0.4207, 0.4132, and 0.3115, respectively). Patients with a higher ratio of C5a to C5 had higher neutrophil percentage and serum immunoglobulin G levels, and significantly lower creatinine levels. Cluster analysis divided the MPA and GPA patients into three subgroups. A principal component (PC) analysis aggregated 15 types of complements into alternative pathway-related PC 1 and complement classical pathway and common pathway-related PC 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The serum levels of properdin and factor D were correlated with the BVAS and the VDI in MPA and GPA, respectively. Our analyses suggested the pathological heterogeneity of MPA and GPA from the aspect of complement components.

Factor Xa inhibitors for preventing recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors for antiphospholipid syndrome patients in real world utilization.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study comprised of all consecutive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome in our department over a period of 28 years. Patients treated with factor Xa inhibitors were extracted from the cohort. As a control group, patients treated with warfarin were selected from the same cohort with matched age, gender, coexistence of systemic lupus erythematosus, and the presence of antiplatelet therapy, after which we used a propensity score for each of the risk factors as an additional covariate in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. The primary endpoint was set as thrombotic and hemorrhagic event-free survival for five years.

RESULTS

Among 206 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, 18 had a history of anti-Xa therapy (five rivaroxaban, 12 edoxaban, one apixaban). Fourteen out of 18 patients on anti-Xa therapy had switched to factor Xa inhibitors from warfarin. Event-free survival was significantly shorter during anti-Xa therapy than that during warfarin therapy (hazard ratio: 12.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.73-248, p = 0.01) ( Figure 1(a) ). Similarly, event-free survival in patients treated with factor Xa inhibitors was significantly shorter compared with controls (hazard ratio: 4.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-13.6, p = 0.0075). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, event-free survival in patients with anti-Xa therapy remained significantly shorter (hazard ratio: 11.9, 95% confidence interval: 2.93-56.0, p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Factor Xa inhibitors may not be recommended for antiphospholipid syndrome.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatic diseases: a real-world observational study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the obstetric complications and the risk factors for these events in pregnant women with rheumatic diseases (RDs).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of women with RDs at Hokkaido University Hospital between 2007 and 2016 was conducted. Clinical features and maternal and fetal outcomes were retrospectively collected. The rate of pregnancy complications was compared with the general obstetric population (GOP) in Japan.

RESULTS

Overall, 132 pregnancies in 95 women with RDs were recorded. Underlying RDs were systemic erythematosus (SLE) (n = 57), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (n = 35), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 9), and other RDs (n = 31). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were detected in 44 pregnancies (32%). Glucocorticoid was used in 82 pregnancies (62%), and tacrolimus in 20 pregnancies (15%). There were 24 disease flares (18%), but no RD-related death was documented. We recorded 112 live births, 6 abortions, 8 miscarriages, and 6 stillbirths. Pregnancies with RDs appeared to have frequent, emergency cesarean sections and preterm deliveries compared with GOP (30% vs 15% and 21% vs 14%, respectively). The median [interquartile range] birthweight in SLE and APS was lower than GOP (2591 [2231-2958] g and 2600 [2276-2920] g vs 2950 [2650-3250] g, respectively). In pregnancies with SLE, low complement levels presented the risk of maternal complications (odds ratio [95% CI]; 3.9 [1.0-14.9], p = 0.046) and anti-DNA antibody positivity was significantly correlated with the risk of fetal complications (3.5 [1.1-11.2], p = 0.036). In pregnancies with APS, maternal age over 35 years and duration of disease longer than 9 years (7.4 [1.3-40.8], p = 0.021, and 11.16 [1.1-118.8], p = 0.046, respectively) were significantly correlated with the risk of fetal complications.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies with RDs were at increased risk of having both maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes, indicating these pregnancies should be closely monitored.

Factors associated with first thrombosis in patients presenting with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the APS Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking Clinical Database and Repository: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the subsequent rate of thrombosis among women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (Ob-APS) in a multicentre database of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients, and the clinical utility of the adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS), a validated tool to assess the likelihood of developing new thrombosis, in this group of patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

The Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking Clinical Database and Repository.

POPULATION

Women with Ob-APS.

METHODS

Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics and measurement of aGAPSS in women with Ob-APS, with or without thrombosis, after initial pregnancy morbidity (PM).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk factors for thrombosis and aGAPSS.

RESULTS

Of 550 patients, 126 had Ob-APS; 74/126 (59%) presented with thrombosis, and 47 (63%) of these women developed thrombosis after initial PM, in a mean time of 7.6 ± 8.2 years (4.9/100 patient years). Younger age at diagnosis of Ob-APS, additional cardiovascular risk factors, superficial vein thrombosis, heart valve disease, and multiple aPL positivity increased the risk of first thrombosis after PM. Women with thrombosis after PM had a higher aGAPSS compared with women with Ob-APS alone [median 11.5 (4-16) versus 9 (4-13); P = 0.0089].

CONCLUSION

Based on a retrospective analysis of our multicentre aPL database, 63% of women with Ob-APS developed thrombosis after initial obstetric morbidity; additional thrombosis risk factors, selected clinical manifestations, and high-risk aPL profile increased the risk. Women with subsequent thrombosis after Ob-APS had a higher aGAPSS at entry to the registry. We believe that aGAPSS is a valid tool to improve risk stratification in aPL-positive women.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

More than 60% of women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome had thrombosis after initial pregnancy morbidity.

Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor α Levels and the –238* A Promoter Polymorphism in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Objectives. To explore the possible involvement of the proinflammatory and prothrombotic cytokine TNFα in APS by determining the plasma levels in patients and to test for association of TNFA promoter polymorphisms and HLA class II genotypes with both plasma TNF and disease. Patients and Method. We studied 83 Caucasoid patients with APS and two groups of healthy controls. TNFα levels were determined in plasma from 35 patients’ and 21 controls using a highly sensitive sandwich ELISA. The full patient group was genotyped together with 95 ethnically matched healthy controls. -308 and -238 TNFA promoter polymorphisms were assessed by ARMS-PCR. HLA-DQB1, DQA1 and DRB1 genotypes were determined by PCR using sequence specific primers. Results. TNFα levels were significantly higher in patients with APS than healthy controls (median 2.95 pg/ml [range 0.51-10.75] vs. 0.95 pg/ml [0.51-1.6], respectively; p = 0.0001). Frequencies of TNFA-308*2 genotype did not differ between patients and controls. In contrast, TNFA-238*A positive genotype was more frequent in APS patients with arterial thrombosis and pregnancy loss than in controls (OR 3.7 [95% CI 1.37-10.1], p = 0.007 and OR 3.95 [95% CI 1.3-11.7], p = 0.01; respectively). DQB1*0303-DRB1*0701 haplotype was associated with TNFA-238*A in the control group (OR 96.0 [95% CI 9.6-959], p 0.0001) as well as in APS patient’s group (OR 54.2 [95% CI 9.6-306.5], p 0.0001). Conclusions. Raised plasma TNFα levels were found in patients with APS. As a prothrombotic and proinflammatory cytokine, TNFα may be involved in the development of clinical features of APS. The lack of correlation between the TNFA-238 polymorphism and plasma levels associated with disease suggests that the TNFα genetic marker may only indirectly relate to protein levels by virtue of allelic association with a functional marker which may reside in the HLA class II region.

Thrombotic risk stratification by platelet count in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: a longitudinal study

Essentials Thrombotic risk stratification is an unmet need in antiphospholipid antibody carriers. Platelet count and antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) were combined to predict thrombotic events. Patients with high aPL-S are at high thrombotic risk regardless of platelet count. If platelet count is low, patients with low aPL-S are also on high thrombotic risk.

SUMMARY

Background Thrombocytopenia is a non-criteria clinical manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome. However, it remains to be elucidated whether thrombocytopenia increases thrombotic risk in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) carriers. Objectives To investigate the impact of platelet count in terms of predicting thrombotic events in aPL carriers, and to stratify the thrombotic risk by combining platelet count and antiphospholipid score (aPL-S), which represents a quantification of aPL varieties and titers. Patients/methods A single-center, retrospective, longitudinal study comprising 953 consecutive patients who were suspected of having autoimmune disease between January 2002 and December 2006 was performed. Low platelet count was defined as a count of < 150 × 103 μL-1 at the time of aPL testing. Results A negative correlation was observed between aPL-S and platelet count (r = - 0.2477). Among aPL-positive patients, those with a low platelet count developed thrombosis more frequently than those without (hazard ratio [HR] 2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-7.88). Among aPL-negative patients, no difference was found in the predictive value of thrombosis regardless of platelet count. Patients with aPLs were further divided into two subgroups according to aPL-S. Among low-aPL-S patients, those with low platelet counts developed thrombosis more frequently than those without (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.05-11.2). In contrast, high-aPL-S patients developed thrombosis frequently regardless of platelet count. Conclusions aPL carriers with low platelet counts are at high risk of developing thrombosis. In particular, 'low-aPL-S carriers' may be stratified by platelet count in terms of predicting future thrombotic events.

Efficiency of Neural Differentiation of Mouse P19 Embryonal Carcinoma Cells is Dependent on the Seeding Density

Serum-free culture conditions for retinoic acid-induced neural differentiation of mouse P19 embryonal carcinoma cells were determined for future ex vivo retroviral gene transfer and brain transplantation studies. Neural differentiation of P19 cells was dependent on the seeding densities, and both neurons and astroglia differentiated efficiently at high seeding densities (2 × 104 and 5 × 104 cells/cm2) but not at low seeding density (1 × 104 cells/cm2). In addition, P19 cells cultured at 5 × 104 cells/cm2 showed neural differentiation whether or not they were infected with Friend leukemia virus FrC6-V, which inhibited neural differentiation at 2 × 104 cells/cm2. These results indicate that FrC6-V-infected P19 embryonal carcinoma cells should be seeded at high density to achieve efficient neural differentiation in vitro for ex vivo gene transfer with a FrC6-V–derived retroviral vector system.

Impact of renal transplantation on glucose tolerance in Japanese recipients with impaired glucose tolerance

AIMS

To investigate changes in glucose tolerance, insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in Japanese recipients before and 1 year after renal transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a study of Japanese recipients without diabetes who underwent renal transplantation at Hokkaido University Hospital. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was performed before and 1 year after renal transplantation in these recipients. Insulin sensitivity was estimated using the Matsuda index and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Insulin secretion was evaluated based on the insulin secretion sensitivity index-2 (ISSI-2).

RESULTS

Of the 62 renal transplant recipients, 31 were diagnosed as having impaired glucose tolerance before transplantation. Among these 31 recipients, after 1 year, four had developed new-onset diabetes after transplantation, and nine had impaired glucose tolerance. Unexpectedly, 18 changed from impaired to normal glucose tolerance. When these recipients with impaired glucose tolerance were classified into a non-amelioration group and an amelioration group, the ISSI-2 was significantly reduced, with no significant changes in the Matsuda index or HOMA-IR, in the non-amelioration group 1 year after renal transplantation. By contrast, ISSI-2 and Matsuda index values were significantly increased, with no significant changes in HOMA-IR values in the amelioration group.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of Japanese renal transplant recipients with impaired glucose tolerance had normal glucose tolerance 1 year after renal transplantation. These results suggest that an increase in insulin secretion and whole insulin sensitivity was associated with improvement in glucose tolerance in these recipients.

Evaluation of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibody testing for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome: results of an international multicentre study

Objective A task force of scientists at the International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies recognized that phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) might contribute to a better identification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Accordingly, initial and replication retrospective, cross-sectional multicentre studies were conducted to ascertain the value of aPS/PT for APS diagnosis. Methods In the initial study (eight centres, seven countries), clinical/laboratory data were retrospectively collected. Serum/plasma samples were tested for IgG aPS/PT at Inova Diagnostics (Inova) using two ELISA kits. A replication study (five centres, five countries) was carried out afterwards. Results In the initial study ( n = 247), a moderate agreement between the IgG aPS/PT Inova and MBL ELISA kits was observed ( k = 0.598). IgG aPS/PT were more prevalent in APS patients (51%) than in those without (9%), OR 10.8, 95% CI (4.0-29.3), p < 0.0001. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratio of IgG aPS/PT for APS diagnosis were 51%, 91%, 5.9 and 0.5, respectively. In the replication study ( n = 214), a moderate/substantial agreement between the IgG aPS/PT results obtained with both ELISA kits was observed ( k = 0.630). IgG aPS/PT were more prevalent in APS patients (47%) than in those without (12%), OR 6.4, 95% CI (2.6-16), p < 0.0001. Sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR- for APS diagnosis were 47%, 88%, 3.9 and 0.6, respectively. Conclusions IgG aPS/PT detection is an easily performed laboratory parameter that might contribute to a better and more complete identification of patients with APS.

Human monoclonal antibodies against the complex of phosphatidylserine and prothrombin from patients with the antiphospholipid antibodies

The presence of antibodies against the complex of prothrombin and phosphatidylserine (aPS/PT) more significantly correlates with manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and with the presence of lupus anticoagulants (LA) than antibodies against prothrombin bound to oxygenated polystyrene (aPT-A). To investigate immunological specificities and functional activities of aPS/PT, four monoclonal aPS/PT, designated as HG-4, KE-6, KF-5 and KF-6, from two patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were established and characterized. Three of these antibodies (HG-4, KF-5 and KF-6) recognized the complex of phosphatidylserine and prothrombin, but did not react to prothrombin directly coated on oxygenated plates. KE-6 bound not only to the complex of phosphatidylserine and prothrombin but also to prothrombin on oxygenated plates. None of them showed the binding activity to prothrombin directly coated on non-oxygenated plates. HG-4, KE-6 and KF-5 had LA-like activity. The findings support the hypothesis that autoimmune aPS/PT recognize the cryptic epitopes or neoepitopes exposed upon interaction between prothrombin and phosphatidylserine, and that aPS/PT are, at least in part, responsible for LA activity. Lupus (2007) 16, 509—516.

Antiphospholipid antibody associated thrombocytopenia and the paradoxical risk of thrombosis

The pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is heterogeneous. Patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and thrombocytopenia in the absence of clinical manifestations of APS will be diagnosed and treated as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. However, the presence of aPL places those individuals at particular risk for developing both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Therefore, we propose the inclusion of such patients in the subgroup ‘aPL-associated thrombocytopenia’. More attention should be devoted to this subgroup of patients to elucidate the role of aPL in the development of thrombocytopenia and to facilitate the adequate monitoring of its potential thrombotic risk.

Role of apolipoprotein B100 and oxidized low-density lipoprotein in the monocyte tissue factor induction mediated by anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to elucidate the not yet known plasma molecule candidates involved in the induction of tissue factor (TF) expression mediated by β2GPI-dependent anticardiolipin antibody (aCL/β2GPI) on monocytes.

METHODS

Human serum incubated with FLAG-β2GPI was applied for affinity chromatography with anti- FLAG antibody. Immunopurified proteins were analyzed by a liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS). TF mRNA induced by the identified molecules on monocytes was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Apolipoprotein B100 (APOB) was the only identified serum molecule in the MS search. Oxidized LDL, containing APOB as well as ox-Lig1 (a known ligand of β2GPI), was revealed as a β2GPI-binding molecule in the immunoprecipitation assay. TF mRNA was markedly induced by oxidized LDL/β2GPI complexes with either WBCAL-1 (monoclonal aCL/β2GPI) or purified IgG from APS patients. The activities of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, one of the component molecules of oxidized LDL, were significantly higher in serum from APS patients than in those from controls.

CONCLUSION

APOB (or oxidized LDL) was detected as a major β2GPI binding serum molecule by LC-MS search. Oxidized LDL/aCL/β2GPI complexes significantly induced TF expressions on monocytes. These data suggest that complexes of oxidized LDL and aCL/β2GPI may have a crucial role in the pathophysiology of APS.