Antibodies to factor VIIa in patients with haemophilia and high-responding inhibitors

Development of a transgenic mouse model with immune tolerance for human coagulation factor VIIa

PURPOSE

Human factor VIIa (FVIIa) is commonly used as bypassing therapy to treat bleeding episodes in hemophilia patients with neutralizing antibodies to factors VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX). There is a need for a suitable animal model to assess the immunogenicity of new FVIIa products during preclinical development. The aim of this study was the design of a novel transgenic mouse model with immune tolerance to human FVIIa.

METHODS

The model was generated by transgenic expression of human F7 cDNA. FVIIa-specific immune responses after treatment with human FVIIa were assessed by analyzing circulating antibodies, antibody producing plasma cells and CD4(+) T cells.

RESULTS

In contrast to wild-type mice, human FVII transgenic mice did not develop antibodies when treated with human FVIIa. The immune tolerance was specific and could be broken by application of human FVIIa together with a strong stimulus of the innate immune system. Break of tolerance was associated with increased numbers of pro-inflammatory FVIIa-specific CD4(+) T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The new mouse model is suitable to study the influence of the innate immune system on maintenance and break of immune tolerance against FVIIa and could be used to assess the immunogenicity of new FVIIa products during pre-clinical development.

Clinical issues in inhibitors

SUMMARY

Anamestic inhibitors represent the major complication of haemophilia therapy now that clotting factor concentrates are virtually free of pathogen-transmission risk. Conventional clotting factor replacement is usually insufficient to prevent or treat bleeding in a haemophilia patient with a high responding inhibitor so that alternative treatment with bypassing agents is required. Despite their relative efficacy, their use does not achieve the same invariable haemostasis that patients without inhibitors do following treatment with factor concentrate replacement. This has led to the attempt to eradicate such inhibitors with immune tolerance induction. Success is not invariable, however, and many patients with long-term persistent high-titre inhibitors continue to experience great morbidity. Recently, this has given rise on a limited basis to attempts to use bypassing agents in prophylaxis regimens in an effort to alleviate this extreme morbidity. Each of these strategies is discussed in the context of their relative benefits and risks.

Recombinant activated clotting factor VII (rFVIIa) in the treatment of surgical and spontaneous bleeding episodes in hemophilic patients

Inhibitors against replacement clotting factors occur in approximately 30%–40% of patients with hemophilia A and 1.5%–3% of patients with hemophilia B. In this group of patients, bleeding events are best treated with bypassing agents. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has become the first-line agent in treating surgical and non-surgical bleeding in many centres with efficacy at standard 90 μg/kg doses approaching 90%. The greater efficacy is associated with early initiation of treatment, as well as, possibly larger doses of rFVIIa. A higher concentration appears to be essential in initiating an adequate thrombin burst, which results in a stable clot. Higher dosage regimens, home therapy and continuous infusion regimens are continuously evolving as we strive to define optimal dosing strategies in hemophilia patients. rFVIIa has been a remarkably safe agent for hemophiliacs but with high dosages being advocated and older patients being given such doses outside a trial setting, thromboembolic events remain a concern.

A randomized comparison of bypassing agents in hemophilia complicated by an inhibitor: the FEIBA NovoSeven Comparative (FENOC) Study

The development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII is a serious complication of hemophilia. FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor-bypassing activity), an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), and NovoSeven, recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), are used as hemostatic bypassing agents in treating patients with inhibitors. The FENOC study was designed to test equivalence of the products in the treatment of ankle, knee, and elbow joint bleeding. A prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, equivalency design was used. The parameters of interest were the percentage of patients who reported efficacy in response to FEIBA and the percentage that reported efficacy in response to NovoSeven. A difference in these percentages of no more than 15% was determined to be a clinically acceptable magnitude for equivalence of the 2 products. The primary outcome was evaluation 6 hours after treatment. Data for 96 bleeding episodes contributed by 48 participants were analyzed. The criterion for declaring the 2 products equivalent at 6 hours was not met; however, the confidence interval of the difference in percentages of efficacy reported for each product only slightly exceeded the 15% boundary (-11.4%-15.7%), P=.059. FEIBA and NovoSeven appear to exhibit a similar effect on joint bleeds, although the efficacy between products is rated differently by a substantial proportion of patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00166309.

Recombinant Factor VIIa (Eptacog Alfa)

Recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven) [also known as recombinant activated factor VII or eptacog alfa] is a vitamin K-dependent glycoprotein that is structurally similar to human plasma-derived factor VIIa. It is a recombinant product, manufactured using DNA biotechnology. Intravenous recombinant factor VIIa has been evaluated in the treatment of bleeding episodes and for providing haemostasis cover during surgery in patients with certain bleeding disorders. Large, well controlled trials of recombinant factor VIIa have not been performed because of the rarity of these bleeding disorders. However, the efficacy of recombinant factor VIIa has been investigated in these patients in double-blind dose-finding or noncomparative clinical trials and worldwide compassionate-use programmes. Recombinant factor VIIa is effective and generally well tolerated in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors, those with acquired haemophilia or Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. Also, recombinant factor VIIa is a treatment of choice in patients with haemophilia B with high-responding inhibitors and those with factor VII deficiency. Direct head-to-head comparisons and robust pharmacoeconomic data are required to fully determine the position of recombinant factor VIIa in relation to other therapies. Importantly though, the product appears to be relatively free of antigenicity, thrombogenicity and risk of viral transmission that, in the past, have limited the utility of blood products. Given that these characteristics are important determinants of the place of a treatment in bleeding disorders, recombinant factor VIIa provides a valuable treatment alternative in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors, platelet-refractory Glanzmann's thrombasthenia or congenital factor VII deficiency.

Novel therapeutic approach for hemophilia using gene delivery of an engineered secreted activated Factor VII

Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder caused by mutations in the genes encoding coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX. Current treatment is through intravenous infusion of the missing protein. The major complication of treatment is the development of neutralizing Ab's to the clotting factor. Infusion of recombinant activated human Factor VII (rhFVIIa), driving procoagulant reactions independently of human FVIII (hFVIII) or hFIX, has been successful in such patients and could in theory provide hemostasis in all hemophilia patients. However, its high cost and short half-life have limited its use. Here, we report a novel treatment strategy with a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector delivering a modified FVII transgene that can be intracellularly processed and secreted as activated FVII (FVIIa). We show long-term expression, as well as phenotypic correction of hemophilia B mice following gene transfer of the murine FVIIa homolog, with no evidence of thrombotic complications at these doses. These data hold promise for a potential treatment for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders.

Role of epsilon amino caproic acid in the management of haemophilic patients with inhibitors

We managed bleeding crisis in 10 consecutive severe haemophilic patients with inhibitors (eight had an inhibitor level of >5 BU mL(-1)) mainly with the antifibrinolytic agent, i.e. epsilon amino caproic acid (EACA). EACA was used by local, oral or intravenous routes either in combination or separately. Five patients developed inhibitors postoperatively and among the remaining five, four had recurrent haemarthrosis or soft tissue bleeds and one patient presented with severe gastrointestinal bleeding without demonstrable lesion. In all the patients, addition of EACA to their management protocol resulted in stoppage and/or reduced frequency of bleeding. In six of 10 patients, the results were excellent; of these six patients, five developed inhibitors postoperatively. Although a reduction in the frequency of bleeding was observed in patients with haemarthrosis and soft tissue bleed, it was not spectacular and the patients required additional therapy. Hence the results could be described as poor. No patient needed to stop the medicine because of the side-effect of EACA. Symptoms like mild nausea and vertigo were seen as the side-effects of this medicine when high intravenous dosage was administered. EACA thus appears to be an excellent adjuvant therapy for haemophilic patients with inhibitors. Besides its well-recognized antifibrinolytic activity, EACA may have additional mechanisms of action in haemophilic patients with inhibitors. More extensive use of this cheap and safe product is warranted in haemophilic patients with inhibitors. If larger studies confirm this observation, then using antifibrinolytics will allow substantial reduction of FEIBA or activated prothrombin complex (APCC) usage in such patients without necessarily increasing the thrombotic complications or reduction of the clinical efficacy, when compared with higher dosage of FEIBA or APCC alone. This will lead to substantial financial savings in countries where up to 35% of severe haemophilia A patients develop inhibitors.