Significance of local recurrence of rectal cancer as a local or disseminated disease

Oncological outcomes of multimodality treatment for patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There are several strategies in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with the optimum treatment yet to be established. This systematic review aims to compare oncological outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for LRRC who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), adjuvant CRT, surgery only or surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL was performed for studies that reported data on oncological outcomes for the different treatment modalities in patients with LRRC from January 1990 to January 2022. Weighted means were calculated for the following outcomes: postoperative resection status, local control, and overall survival at 3 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies of 974 patients were included and they received the following treatment: 346 neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 279 neoadjuvant CRT, 136 adjuvant CRT, 189 surgery only, and 24 surgery and IORT. The highest proportion of R0 resection was found in the neoadjuvant CRT group followed by neoadjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant CRT groups (64.07% vs 52.46% vs 47.0% respectively). The neoadjuvant CRT group had the highest mean 5-year local control rate (49.50%) followed by neoadjuvant radiotherapy (22.0%). Regarding the 5-year overall survival rate, the neoadjuvant CRT group had the highest mean of 34.92%, followed by surgery only (29.74%), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (28.94%) and adjuvant CRT (20.67%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this systematic review suggest that neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery can lead to improved resection status, long-term disease control and survival in the management of LRRC. However, treatment strategies in LRRC are complex and further comparisons, particularly taking into account previous treatments for the primary rectal cancer, are required.

Elevated CEA with negative PET scan on surveillance of colorectal cancers-a role of CEA kinetics

INTRODUCTION

The management of patients with elevated CEA after curative treatment of colorectal cancers without structural disease is uncertain. The aim was to study the clinical risk factors, CEA thresholds, and kinetics that could predict relapses.

METHODS

Retrospective study of colorectal cancers patients that were detected to have an elevated CEA (> 5 ng/ml on 2 separate occasions) and normal clinical exam, colonoscopy, and positron emission tomography (PET). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoff for absolute CEA values and proportional rise that could predict recurrences.

RESULTS

162 patients were followed for a median of 42 months. 32 patients (19.7%) relapsed of which 11 (34.4%) had a peritoneal disease. Besides known clinical risk factors, higher CEA at the time of negative PET and rising CEA trend predicted disease recurrence on multivariate logistic regression. CEA threshold of 10.05 ng/ml provided a sensitivity/specificity of 53%/86.2%, while CEA velocity of 1.36 ng/ml over 3 months presented a sensitivity/specificity of 80%/70.6% for subsequent relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminatory value of CEA kinetics was more than that of a single absolute value. An algorithm for managing these patients based on clinical risk factors, absolute CEA value, and its kinetics is suggested.

Palliative pelvic exenteration: A systematic review of patient-centered outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Palliative pelvic exenteration (PPE) is a technically complex operation with high morbidity and mortality rates, considered in patients with limited life expectancy. There is little evidence to guide practice. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the impact of PPE on symptom relief and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASe, and PubMed databases for studies reporting on outcomes of PPE for symptom relief or QoL. Descriptive statistics were used on pooled patient cohorts.

RESULTS

Twenty-three historical cohorts and case series were included, comprising 509 patients. No comparative studies were found. Most malignancies were of colorectal, gynaecological and urological origin. Common indications for PPE were pain, symptomatic fistula, bleeding, malodour, obstruction and pelvic sepsis. The pooled median postoperative morbidity rate was 53.6% (13-100%), the median in-hospital mortality was 6.3% (0-66.7%), and median OS was 14 months (4-40 months). Some symptom relief was reported in a median of 79% (50-100%) of the patients, although the magnitude of effect was poorly measured. Data for QoL measures were inconclusive. Five studies discouraged performing PPE in any patient, while 18 studies concluded that the procedure can be considered in highly selected patients.

CONCLUSION

Available evidence on PPE is of low-quality. Morbidity and mortality rates are high with a short median OS interval. While some symptom relief may be afforded by this procedure, evidence for improvement in QoL is limited. A highly selective individualised approach is required to optimise the risk:benefit equation.

Prognostic significance of doubling time in patients undergoing radical surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The doubling times of tumor volume and tumor markers are associated with the prognosis of liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, no studies have assessed peritoneal metastases. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the association between doubling time and the prognosis of patients who underwent radical surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases of CRC.

METHODS

We calculated the tumor doubling times (TDT) of peritoneal metastases and serum carcinoembryonic antigen-doubling times (CEA-DT) in 33 consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases between January 2006 and April 2017. The impact of short TDT and CEA-DT on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

In long TDT (> 137 days) group, the 5-year OS rate was 74.1% and median OS time was 6.6 years. In long CEA-DT (> 102 days) group, the 5-year OS rate was 50.0% and median OS time was 5.6 years. Conversely, in short TDT (≤ 137 days) and CEA-DT (≤ 102 days) group, the 5-year OS rates and median OS times were both 0.0% and 3.2 years, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, short TDT was an independent risk factor for poor RFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.010). Similarly, short CEA-DT was also a poor risk factor for RFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Short TDT and CEA-DT are independent risk factors for poor OS and RFS after surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases of CRC. TDT and CEA-DT should be considered when selecting candidates for surgical resection.

Single-stage anterior high sacrectomy for locally recurrent rectal cancer

STUDY DESIGN

A review of prospectively collected data on a consecutive series of patients undergoing single-stage anterior high sacrectomy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma (LRRC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical outcome of patients who underwent anterior high sacrectomy for LRRC.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

High sacrectomy for oncological resection remains technically challenging. Surgery has the potential to achieve cure in carefully selected patients. Complete (R0) tumor excision in LRRC may require sacrectomy. High sacral resections (S3 and above) typically require a combined anterior/supine and posterior/prone procedure. We investigated our experience performing single-stage anterior high sacrectomy for LRRC.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with LRRC without systemic metastases who underwent resection with curative intent requiring high sacrectomy were identified. A review of a prospectively maintained colorectal and spine cancer database data was performed. An oblique dome high sacral osteotomy was performed during a single-stage anterior procedure. Outcome measures included surgical resection margin status, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, physical functioning status, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients were treated between 2002 and 2011. High sacrectomy was performed at sacral level S1-S2 in 4 patients, S2-S3 in 9 patients, and through S3 in 6 patients. An R0 resection margin was achieved histologically in all 19 cases. There was 1 early (<30 d) postoperative death (1/19, 5%). At median follow-up of 38 months, 13 patients had no evidence of residual disease, 1 was alive with disease, and 4 had died of disease. Morbidities occurred in 15 of the 19 patients (79%).

CONCLUSION

Although high sacrectomy may require a combined anterior and posterior surgical approach, our series demonstrates the feasibility of performing single-stage anterior high sacrectomy in LRRC, with acceptable risks and outcomes compared with the literature. The procedure described by us for LRRC lessens the need for a simultaneous or staged prone posterior resection, with favorable R0 tumor resections, patient survival, and clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Intentionally curative treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of outcome data beyond local recurrence rates after primary treatment in rectal cancer, despite more information being necessary for clinical decision-making. We sought to determine patient selection, therapeutic modalities and outcomes of locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with curative intent.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1990-2010) using the medical subject headings "rectal neoplasms" and "neoplasm recurrence, local." Selection of cohort studies was based on the primary intention of treatment and availability of at least 1 outcome variable.

RESULTS

We included 55 cohort studies comprising 3767 patients; 8 studies provided data on the rate of intentionally curative treatment from an unselected consecutive cohort of patients (481 of 1188 patients; 40%). Patients were symptomatic with pain in 50% (796 of 1607) of cases. Overall, 3088 of 3767 patients underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 56% (1484 of 2637 patients). The rate of external beam radiotherapy was 100% in 9 studies, 0% in 5 studies, and ranged from 12% to 97% in 37 studies. Overall postoperative mortality was 2.2% (57 of 2515 patients). Five-year survival was at least 25%, with an upper limit of 41% in 11 of 18 studies including at least 50 resections. We found a significant increase in reported survival rates over time (r2 = 0.214, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

More uniformity in treatment protocols and reporting on outcomes for locally recurrent rectal cancer is warranted. The observed improvement of reported survival rates in time is probably related to better patient selection and optimized multimodality treatment in specialized centres.

Outcome of surgical resection of second-time locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally recurrent rectal cancer relapses in the pelvis in up to 60 per cent of patients following resection. This study assessed the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for re-recurrent rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent second-time resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer between 2001 and 2010 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected on demographics, presentation of disease, preoperative staging imaging, adjuvant therapy, operative detail, histopathology and follow-up status (clinical and imaging) for the primary tumour, and first and second recurrences.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (of 56 discussed at the multidisciplinary meeting) underwent resection of re-recurrent rectal cancer. Postoperative morbidity occurred in nine patients but none died within 30 days. Negative resection margins (R0) were achieved in ten patients, microscopic margin positivity (R1) was evident in 15 and macroscopic involvement (R2) was found in five. Although no patient had distant metastatic disease, 22 had involvement of the pelvic side wall. One- and 3-year overall survival rates were 77 and 27 per cent respectively, with a median overall survival of 23 (range 3-78) months. An R0 resection conferred a survival benefit (median survival 32 (11-78) months versus 19 (6-33) months after R1 and 7 (3-10) months after R2 resection).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection of re-recurrent rectal cancer had comparable surgical and oncological outcomes to initial recurrences in well selected patients.

Pelvic colorectal recurrence: crucial role of radiologists in oncologic and surgical treatment options

Radical resection is the only potential cure for patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer and is considered curative only when the histologic margins are clear of tumour. Early diagnosis of the disease is essential as it increases the likelihood of a potentially curative resection and prevention of dissemination. Clinical examination, tumour markers and radiologic modalities such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are routinely used in an effort to accurately stage these patients and provide useful information for the selection of patients for further treatment/management. This review describes the methods of staging patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer prior to surgery emphasizing the role that radiologists have in this process.

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative outcome and long-term survival of patients who underwent surgical resection for recurrent rectal cancer within a multimodal approach in the era of total mesorectal excision (TME).

BACKGROUND

Introduction of TME has reduced local recurrence and improved oncological outcome of patients with rectal cancer. Local recurrence after TME still occurs in 2% to 8% of patients and presents a challenge to surgical and medical oncologists. However, there has been very limited data on the perioperative and long-term outcome of patients who are operated for local recurrence in the era of TME.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients who were identified from a prospective rectal cancer database underwent surgical exploration for recurrent rectal cancer after previous TME between October 2001 and April 2009. Risk factors of perioperative morbidity were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Independent predictors of disease-specific survival were identified by a Cox proportional hazards regression model, as were those of local recurrence and disease recurrence at any site.

RESULTS

Surgical resection was performed in 92 patients and negative resection margins were achieved in 54 (58.7%) of these. Recurrent disease was located intraluminally and extraluminally in 35 (38.0%) patients and 57 (62.0%) patients, respectively. A total of 19 (20.6%) patients had metastatic extrapelvic disease at the time of surgery. Perioperative surgical morbidity and in-hospital mortality accounted for 42.4% and 3.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, partial sacrectomy was associated with surgical morbidity (P = 0.004). Three- and 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 61% and 47%. Three-year survival rate of patients with extrapelvic disease who underwent R0 resection was 42%. On multivariate analysis, surgical morbidity (P = 0.001), presence of extrapelvic disease (P = 0.006), and noncurative (R1; R2) resection (P < 0.0001) were identified as independent adverse predictors of disease-specific survival, whereas a transabdominal resection (as opposed to an abdominoperineal resection/pelvic exenteration) was associated with a more favorable prognosis (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of local recurrence from rectal cancer in the era TME can be carried out with acceptable morbidity and curative resection rates. Curative resection remains the major prognostic factor and may enable long-term survival even in patients with extrapelvic disease.

Prognostic factors for survival after salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Although locoregional recurrence after rectal cancer resection has been extensively investigated, studies of salvage surgery for locoregionally recurrent colon cancer are scarce. This study aimed to determine the predictors of postsalvage survival for locoregionally recurrent colon cancer.

METHODS

We studied 45 consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically complete resection of locoregionally recurrent colon cancer between April 1988 and December 2007. The primary end point was cancer-specific survival, and 20 clinical variables were analyzed for their prognostic significance.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific 5-year survival for the entire cohort of 45 patients was 46%. Multivariate survival analysis showed that margin status (P = .0311), number of locoregional recurrent tumors (P = .0002), pathological grade (P = .0416), largest tumor diameter (P = .0247), and distant metastasis (P = .0006) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer can provide a chance for long-term survival in selected patients.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer in Norway

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe management and outcome in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer based on data from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry.

METHODS

This was a prospective national cohort study of 577 patients with local recurrence after major resection (R0/R1) for rectal cancer between November 1993 and December 2001 (initial cohort of 4504 patients).

RESULTS

Of the 577 patients, 185 (32.1 per cent) had curative resections (R0/R1), 203 (35.2 per cent) had palliative radiotherapy with or without palliative surgery and chemotherapy, and 189 (32.8 per cent) received no treatment at all or only palliative surgery or chemotherapy. The overall 5-year survival rate was 14.9 per cent. Ninety-seven patients had an R0 resection, and 88 had an R1 resection, with 5-year overall survival of 55 and 20 per cent respectively. This outcome reflected surgical treatment in 33 different hospitals. Some 274 patients (47.5 per cent) had metastases. The 5-year survival rate after R0 resection was 62 per cent in patients without metastases.

CONCLUSION

Obtaining an R0 resection is the most important prognostic factor in treating recurrent rectal cancer.

Preoperative irradiation and surgery for local recurrence of rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Prognostic factors with regard to survival and further local recurrence

OBJECTIVE

Local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery is an important clinical problem.

METHOD

150 patients with local recurrence after rectal/rectosigmoid cancer, stage M0, underwent surgery after preoperative irradiation (46-50 Gy).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival was 27% (44% R0, 38% R1 and 17% R2-stage). Corresponding survival/local recurrence rates were 52%/27% for R0- and 14%/63% for R1-stage. No R2-resected survived 4 years. A normal pretreatment CEA level was significantly associated with increased survival but normalization following preoperative therapy was not associated with an improvement in prognosis. Survival and local recurrence were also significantly influenced by the type of primary operation. Several factors were significant for the prediction of an R0-resection in univariate analysis, but only CEA and symptoms at the time of recurrence predicted an R0-resection in multivariate analysis. A long latency time to recurrence did not significantly influence prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative irradiation and surgery can result in an R0-resection and a long survival in patients with recurrence after initial treatment for rectal or rectosigmoid cancer. Also patients with an R1-resection can benefit from surgery since a substantial number will die without further local recurrence. An R0-resection is the main prognostic factor followed by CEA level, sex and type of primary operation. Normalization of CEA after preoperative treatment is not of prognostic significance. The value of the Norwegian follow-up regimen is questioned.

Resection of isolated pelvic recurrences after colorectal surgery: long-term results and predictors of improved clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Recurrence in the pelvis after resection of a rectal or rectosigmoid cancer presents a dilemma. Resection offers the only reasonable probability for cure, but at the cost of perioperative morbidity and potential mortality. Clinical decision making remains difficult.

METHODS

Patients resected with curative intent for isolated pelvic recurrences after curative colorectal surgery from 1988 through 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical and pathologic factors, salvage operations, and complications were recorded. The primary measured outcome was overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors of improved outcome.

RESULTS

Ninety patients underwent an attempt at curative resection of a pelvic recurrence with median follow-up of 31 months. Complications occurred in 53% of patients. Operative mortality was 4.4% (4 of 90). Median overall survival was 38 months, and estimated 5-year survival was 40%. A total of 51 of 86 patients had known recurrences (15 local, 16 distant, 20 both). Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level and final margin status were statistically significant predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The resection of pelvic recurrences after colorectal surgery for cancer can be performed with low mortality and good long-term outcome; however, morbidity from such procedures is high. Low preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and negative margin of resection predict improved survival.

Long-term cure in surgery for extrarectal pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Survival benefit of radical surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer depends on whether disease is cured rather than whether death is delayed. Cured patients gain decades of life and are spared from sufferings with recurrence. Unfortunately, the majority of patients undergoing surgery, particularly those with extrarectal pelvic recurrence, have poor outcomes with occult disseminated disease. This study was designed to identify which of these patients are curable.

METHODS

Of 61 patients with pelvic recurrence treated by radical reexcision more than nine years before, 36 patients whose initial surgery was abdominoperineal resection were examined retrospectively. We used the logistic regression and Gamel-Boag regression models to estimate curability and identify predictors of cure.

RESULTS

Ten patients survived five years and seven survived ten years. The cumulative disease-specific mortality curve leveled off 6.5 years after reexcision and remained at 74 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60-89), indicating that the remaining 26 percent are curable. This value is comparable with the 23 percent curability estimated by the Gamel-Boag model, which also found that the disease-free interval from the initial surgery to the first recurrence is the best predictor of cure (P = 0.005). Of 11 patients with disease-free interval three years or more, 6 survived ten years, whereas 8 of 9 patients with disease-free interval less than one year died of second recurrence within three years of reexcision.

CONCLUSIONS

Even patients with extrarectal pelvic recurrence may have isolated disease that is amenable to complete eradication. As a biologic marker, the disease-free interval serves to predict curability and may distinguish isolated disease from occult disseminated disease.

Resection of Isolated Pelvic Recurrences After Colorectal Surgery: Long-Term Results and Predictors of Improved Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Recurrence in the pelvis after resection of a rectal or rectosigmoid cancer presents a dilemma. Resection offers the only reasonable probability for cure, but at the cost of marked perioperative morbidity and potential mortality. Clinical decision making remains difficult.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection with curative intent for isolated pelvic recurrences after curative colorectal surgery from 1988 through 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical and pathological factors, salvage operations, and complications were recorded. The primary measured outcome was overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors of improved outcome.

RESULTS

Ninety patients underwent an attempt at curative resection of a pelvic recurrence; median follow-up was 31 months. Complications occurred in 53% of patients. Operative mortality occurred in 4 (4.4%) of 90 patients. Median overall survival was 38 months, and estimated 5-year survival was 40%. A total of 51 of 86 patients had known recurrences (15 local, 16 distant, 20 both). Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level and final margin status were statistically significant predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The resection of pelvic recurrences after colorectal surgery for cancer can be performed with low mortality and good long-term outcome; however, morbidity from such procedures is high. Low preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and negative margin of resection predict improved survival.

Surgery for local recurrence of rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Despite improvement in management of primary rectal cancer, 2.6-32% of patients develop local recurrence. A proportion of these patients can be amenable to salvage surgery. The present article reviews the evidence for and against the surgical management for local recurrence of rectal cancer, the role of adjuvant and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and evaluates short and long-term outcomes.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane database for studies between 1980 and 2005 assessing surgical management of local recurrence of rectal cancer and the evidence was critically evaluated.

RESULTS

Nearly 50% of rectal cancer recurrences are local and are therefore potentially amenable to curative resection. Preoperative imaging is important for appropriate selection of patients for surgery and preoperative adjuvant therapy is essential. Five-year survival following resection ranges from 18% to 58% with 5-year survival following complete resection of over 35% though morbidity ranges from 21% to 82%. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is beneficial and IORT may have a contributory role in treatment. Aggressive surgical treatment favourably affects quality of life and is cost effective. Surgery for local recurrence can result in significant long-term survival with acceptable morbidity and improved quality of life in appropriately selected patients. Assessment in a specialist centre familiar with these techniques is essential.

Abdominal Sacral Resection for Posterior Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Carcinoma: Analyses of Prognostic Factors and Recurrence Patterns

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence of rectal cancer presents challenging problems. Although abdominal sacral resection (ASR) provides pain control, survival prolongation, and possibly cure, reported morbidity and mortality are still high, and survival is still low. Thus, appropriate patient selection and adjuvant therapy based on prognostic factors and recurrence patterns are necessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ASR for posterior pelvic recurrence of rectal carcinoma and to analyze prognostic factors and recurrence patterns.

METHODS

Forty-four patients underwent ASR for curative intent in 40 and palliative intent in 4 cases. All but one could be followed up completely. Multivariate analyses of factors influencing survival and positive surgical margins were conducted.

RESULTS

Morbidity and mortality were 61% and 2%, respectively. Overall 5-year survival was 34%. The Cox regression model revealed a positive resection margin (hazard ratio, 10 [95% confidence interval, 3.8-28]), a local disease-free interval of <12 months (4.2 [1.8-9.8]), and pain radiating to the buttock or further (4.2 [1.6-11]) to be independently associated with poor survival. The logistic regression model showed that macroscopic multiple expanding or diffuse infiltrating growths were independently associated with a positive margin (7.5 [1.4-40]). Of the patients with recurrence, 56% had failures confined locally or to the lung.

CONCLUSIONS

ASR is beneficial to selected patients in terms of survival. To select patients, evaluation of the resection margin, the local disease-free interval, pain extent, and macroscopic growth pattern is important. To improve survival, adjuvant treatment should be aimed at local and lung recurrences.

Treatment Strategy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Despite radical surgery, up to 33% of patients with rectal cancer will develop locoregional relapse. The management of these patients is particularly challenging. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for those with a mobile recurrence. However, the majority of patients develop recurrence involving the pelvic wall. In these patients, multimodality therapy including radical surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy have been reported with 5-year survival of up to 31% and local control rates of 50-71%. The most important factor for obtaining long-term local control and survival is R0 resection. Extended surgery such as abdomino-sacral resection has not been popular because of 5-year survival rates of 16-31%, and significant postoperative morbidity. Re-recurrence following surgery occurs locally and in the lung, and remains a significant problem. In surgical treatment for local recurrence, surgeon-related factors are crucial. A staging system using degree of fixation and other prognostic factors should be developed so that appropriate treatment modalities are applied to each case.

Fas/CD95 signaling rather than angiogenesis or proliferative activity is a useful prognostic factor in patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The selection of resective therapy for colorectal hepatic metastases remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors for patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer by analyzing not only clinicopathological factors but also recent immunohistological markers.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients underwent hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over the past 20 years. Fas/CD95 expression, microvessel density, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) proliferative activity were assessed with immunohistochemical methods in addition to the clinicopathological factors. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model, both univariately and multivariately.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the number of metastases, Fas/CD95 expression, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time (CEADT) were significant prognostic indicators, whereas the mode of hepatic resection, chemotherapy, and other clinicopathological factors had no influence on survival. Fas/CD95 index correlated with postoperative CEADT (p=0.039), number of metastases (p=0.018), and survival (p=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the number of metastases and CEADT as prominent prognostic factors after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. These two factors reflect the degree of Fas/CD95 signaling rather than angiogenesis or cancer growth rate.

Hydronephrosis Does Not Preclude Curative Resection of Pelvic Recurrences After Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

In one third of patients who die of rectal cancer, a pelvic recurrence after resection represents isolated disease for which re-resection may provide cure. These extensive resections can carry high morbidity. Proper patient selection is desirable but difficult. Hydronephrosis has been documented previously to portend a poor prognosis, and some consider it a contraindication to attempted resection. It was our goal to review our experience and either confirm or refute these conclusions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 90 patients resected with curative intent for pelvic recurrence at our center from 1988 through 2003. Seventy-one records documented the preoperative presence or absence of hydronephrosis. Clinical and pathologic data were recorded. The groups with and without hydronephrosis were compared.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients with hydronephrosis in this study and 56 without. Although patients with hydronephrosis had shorter overall survival, disease-free survival, and rate of local control, none of these differences was statistically significant. Patients in the hydronephrosis group were younger and had higher-stage primary tumors and larger recurrent tumors. Subsequently, they underwent more extensive resections and were more likely to be treated with adjuvant therapies. There was no difference in the rate of margin-negative resections between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydronephrosis correlates with younger patients with larger recurrent tumors undergoing more extensive operations and multimodality therapy but does not preclude curative (R0) resection or independently affect overall survival, disease-free survival, or local control. We believe that it should not be considered a contraindication to attempting curative resection.

Resection of locally recurrent colorectal cancer in the presence of distant metastases: can it be justified?

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the outcome of resections for local recurrence of colorectal carcinoma in the presence of distant (M1) disease.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of local recurrence in the presence of potentially resectable M1 disease were identified from the colorectal database. Outcome was determined by chart review.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (23 men) of mean age 60 years (range, 34-88 years) underwent complete gross resection of their local recurrence in the presence of M1 disease. Thirteen of the 42 underwent synchronous M1 resections to render them free of gross disease (R0). Nine of the 29 patients who left with residual disease (R1) subsequently underwent staged M1 resection, so that 22 of 42 were rendered R0 by surgery. The median survival of all patients was 14.5 months (interquartile range, 6-30 months), and that of patients rendered R0 was 23 months (interquartile range, 10-37 months), in comparison with 7 months (interquartile range, 3-25 months) for those of R1 status (P =.006; log-rank method). Ability to achieve R0 status by synchronous or staged resection was the only factor predictive of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of M1 disease per se should not preclude resection of local recurrence, although case selection is problematic.

Local recurrence of cancer of the rectum

BACKGROUND

[corrected] Although radiotherapy or total mesorectal excision decreases the risk of local recurrence of rectal cancer, this risk remains around 10%.

METHODS

Of 80 patients having a local recurrence, 38 (48%) underwent a re-resection combined in 10 cases with resection of mestastases.

RESULTS

The incidence of asymptomatic detected recurrence was higher after anterior resection (39%) than after abdominoperineal resection (18%). Re-resection was performed more often (P <0.01) in the past 2 decades after anterior or Hartman first procedure than after abdominoperineal resection (67% versus 21%), and more often in asymptomatic patients than in symptomatic patients (71% versus 38%). The actuarial 5-year survival rate after re-resection was 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection of local recurrence, with PET scan using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (8 cases in the present series), leads to an improved re-resection rate. In patients who did not undergo radiotherapy (all patients but 1) re-resection can be achieved safely (no postoperative mortality). The place for radiation in the treatment of rectal cancer has to be revaluated and compared with total mesorectal excision and results of re-resection for local recurrence.

Patterns of pelvic invasion are prognostic in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence of rectal cancer after curative resection remains a difficult clinical problem. The aim of this study was to elucidate prognostic risk factors after resection of recurrent cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1983 and December 1999, 83 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were studied retrospectively for survival benefit by re-resection. Sixty patients underwent resection for recurrent cancer, including total pelvic exenteration in 30 patients and sacrectomy in 23 patients. The extent of locally recurrent tumour was classified by the pattern of pelvic invasion as follows: localized, sacral invasion and lateral invasion.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that the pattern of pelvic invasion was a significant prognostic factor which independently influenced survival after resection of recurrent cancer (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates were 38 per cent in the localized type (n = 27), 10 per cent in the sacral invasive type (n = 16) and zero in the lateral invasive type (n = 17).

CONCLUSION

Resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer is potentially curative in patients with localized or sacral invasive patterns of recurrence. Alternatives should be explored in patients with recurrence involving the lateral pelvic wall.

TI-201 SPECT compared with histopathologic grade in the prognostic assessment of cerebral gliomas

PURPOSE

Although TI-201 SPECT has been used to evaluate the malignant grade of cerebral gliomas, the gold standard continues to be histopathologic examination. The authors assessed and compared the prognostic abilities of the two studies using survival analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients underwent 34 sessions of TI-201 SPECT plus surgery for primary or recurrent cerebral gliomas 12 to 78 months before this analysis. Using conventional survival analyses, such as the log-rank test, Cox regression, and the Akaike cross-tab method, the authors evaluated the prognostic significance of 10 variables: histopathologic grade, TI-201 SPECT, Tc-99m HMPAO SPECT, tumor cell viability, radionecrosis, neurologic defects, clinical improvement, surgery, chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy.

RESULTS

TI-201 SPECT was most strongly related to prognosis, followed by histopathologic grade. The other variables had little prognostic value. The Cox stepwise selection procedure indicated that TI-201 SPECT was the only independent predictor of outcome, whereas histopathologic analysis was eliminated from the prognostic model. However, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and the Akaike method indicated that histopathologically low-grade tumors were more closely associated with longer-term survival than were TI-201 low uptake tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

TI-201 SPECT is not only closely correlated with the histopathologic grade of tumor but is a significantly better predictor of outcome than histopathologic grade. However, histopathologic examination may provide additional information on longer-term survival. TI-201 SPECT is a valuable procedure, especially in patients in whom a histologic diagnosis of possible glioma cannot be made.

[Curative treatment of local and regional rectal cancer recurrences]

How to select patients likely to benefit from reoperation? When a neoadjuvant treatment is still feasible, is it useful to perform preoperative radiation or chemoradiation? What can be expected after resection of local recurrences in terms of survival and quality of life? Does surveillance of patients operated for rectal carcinoma influence resectability of local recurrences and results? These are the main questions concerning the management of local recurrences after resection of a rectal carcinoma.

Pathologic significance of tumor progression in locally recurrent rectal cancer: different nature from primary cancer

PURPOSE

It has recently been demonstrated that the tumor growth rate is a stronger determinant of survival than the extent of the growth in local recurrence of rectal cancer. We studied which factors controlled the tumor growth rate using modern immunohistochemical methods.

METHODS

In 51 patients who underwent extended resection for this condition, paraffin-embedded specimens were examined for 1) tumor angiogenesis by CD31 staining and microvessel counting, 2) apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end-labeling staining, and 3) cellular proliferative activity using anti-proliferative cell nuclear antigen antibody. The results were compared with carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time and survival.

RESULTS

The five-year survival rate was 20 percent. The postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time, which was the strongest predictor of survival, correlated highly with proliferative cell nuclear antigen labeling index, but did not correlate with the apoptotic index or microvessel counts.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that cancer cell proliferation rather than apoptosis or angiogenesis is a major determinant of tumor growth rate and survival in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Sacropelvic resection for recurrent anorectal cancer. A multidisciplinary approach

A multimodal approach including preoperative external beam radiation, surgical resection, and intraoperative electron radiation was used in 23 patients with locally advanced anal or recurrent rectal cancers involving the sacrum. The proximal extent of complete sacral resection was S2 in three patients, S3 in 12 patients, S4 in two patients, and S5 in one patient. The tumor was confined to the anterior sacral cortex in five patients. The resection was marginal in 10, contaminated marginal in 11, and intralesional in two patients. At 19 to 54 months of followup, five patients are alive without evidence of disease and four are alive with disease. Twelve patients died of their disease, and two died of other causes. There was a mean survival of 32.9 months for the patients who were alive at followup. Kaplan-Meier survival for all patients was 82% at 1 year and 73% at 2 years, with death of disease as an endpoint. Thirteen (57%) patients had another local recurrence develop at a mean of 17.2 months. Eight (35%) patients had metastatic disease develop at a mean of 16.3 months. Proper patients selection is important in ensuring a favorable outcome from this aggressive surgery.

Reresection for local recurrence of rectal cancer

Local recurrence is one of the major reasons that rectal cancer surgery is unsuccessful. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical characteristics of patients undergoing reresection for local recurrence of rectal cancer. A total of nine patients were enrolled in this study, six of whom underwent total pelvic exenteration, one, posterior exenteration, one, abdominoperineal resection with sacral resection, and one, lymph node dissection alone. The mean operative time was 8 h 15 min, and the mean operative blood loss was 2 325 ml. Although major postoperative complications occurred in four patients (44%), there were no postoperative or hospital deaths. Lateral lymph node metastasis was detected in all four patients whose lateral lymph nodes were dissected or extirpated at the reresection. Two patients survived for more than 5 years without rerecurrence, and the cumulative 5-year survival rate was 26%. The para-aortic lymph nodes were the most common site of first rerecurrence. The results of this study indicate that patients who undergo reresection for local recurrence of rectal cancer are at high risk of devel-oping lateral or para-aortic nodal metastasis. Nevertheless, reresection may be a therapeutic option for the local recurrence of rectal cancer.

[Total pelvic exenteration and rectal cancer. Apropos of 20 cases]

STUDY AIM

The report of a series of 20 patients with the aim of trying to specify the implications of pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1986 to 1996, 20 total pelvic exenterations were performed for rectal adenocarcinoma. This retrospective study included locally extended carcinomas (n = 10), and recurrences (n = 10) after anterior resection (n = 7), and after abdominoperineal resection (n = 3). The subjects included 13 men and seven women with a mean age of 54 years (34-74 years). Complaints were major and serious: pain (n = 20), rectal syndrome (n = 17), recto-vesical fistula (n = 5) recto-vaginal fistula (n = 5), urinary infection (n = 13), and hematuria (n = 6). Preoperative radiotherapy was performed in 11 patients and preoperative radio chemotherapy in six. The surgical procedure included a total pelvic exenteration with perinectomy in 12 patients, and a total pelvic exenteration with preservation of levator ani and perineum in eight, associated in two cases with a partial resection of the sacrum, and in two other cases with partial hepatectomy for a single liver metastasis. Urinary diversion was a trans ileal ureterostomy in 17 patients and a direct double ureterostomy in three.

RESULTS

The mean duration of surgery was 6 h. The mean preoperative blood loss was 1,200 L. Nine patients received blood transfusion. There was no postoperative mortality but in contrast, the morbidity rate was high with mainly urinary and digestive complications, pelvic sepsis and thromboembolic complications. After pathological examination, tumoral resections were classified R0 in 19 cases, and R1 in one. All tumors were T4 with tumoral invasion of the bladder (n = 15), prostate (n = 6), seminal vesicles (n = 4), ureter (n = 3), vagina (n = 7), urethra (n = 1), and sacrum (n = 1). Lymph node involvement was present in four patients. The 3 and 5 year actuarial survival rate was respectively 47 and 18%. Thirteen patients died of their cancer, nine from metastases, and four from local recurrence with a mean survival of 29 and 32 months respectively. Seven patients were alive at the time of this study, six without actual recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of its aggressive aspect, total pelvic exenteration seems justified in rectal carcinoma when extended to the urinary tract, when it causes major functional disorders, when there are no detectable metastases, and when the tumor has no posterior or lateral fixation. Local tumoral evolution can usually be controlled by pelvic exenteration but prolongation of survival is not demonstrated.

Multidisciplinary management of recurrent colorectal cancer

Isolated pelvic recurrence of rectal carcinoma may occur in up to one third of patients following definitive resection of primary disease. The means by which recurrence is diagnosed, methods by which it may be treated, and reported outcomes are all evolving and improving. Current data indicate that a substantial proportion of patients treated by aggressive multi-modality salvage therapy may be provided with durable survival. This review highlights current concepts in the diagnosis and management of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.