Differential graft-versus-leukaemia effect by CD28 and CD40 co-stimulatory blockade after graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

The Aberrantly Expressed Nuclear Factor (Erythroid-derived 2)-Like 2 Participates in aGVHD by Modulating the Activation and Differentiation of CD4+ T Lymphocytes

BACKGROUND

Current investigation indicates that nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2) possesses both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory capabilities in T cells, yet its exact function in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) CD4+ T cells remains unexplored.

METHODS

This study aims to determine NRF2 levels within CD4+ T cells of patients with or without aGVHD and analyze the correlation between T-cell receptor activation and NRF2 expression. RNA sequencing was used to detect changes in the expression profile of CD4+ T cells after overexpression of NRF2, and functional enrichment analysis was performed on the sequencing results. Finally, after treating aGVHD CD4+ T cells with NRF2 inhibitor, the expression of related pathway molecules was detected.

RESULTS

Our findings demonstrated a significant upregulation of NRF2 expression in CD4+ T cells from patients in the aGVHD group compared with patients in the non-aGVHD group, and its expression level is correlated with the severity of aGVHD. Additionally, T-cell receptor activation in CD4+ T cells elevates NRF2 expression. Postactivation of NRF2-inhibited CD4+ T cells, the expression levels of T-cell activation markers were notably lower than those in non-NRF2-inhibited CD4+ T cells. Sequencing analysis identified 904 genes that changed after NRF2 overexpression. These genes were categorized into 288 gene subsets, encompassing pathways such as T-cell receptor signaling transduction, Janus kinase 1/signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (JAK1-STAT1) signaling, T helper cell 17 (Th17) cell differentiation, etc. Ultimately, treating CD4+ T cells of aGVHD patients with an NRF2 inhibitor led to a significant downregulation of JAK1-STAT1 signaling and Th17 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated NRF2 expression in CD4+ T cells of patients with aGVHD initiates and exacerbates aGVHD by potentiating T-cell activation, amplifying JAK1/STAT1 signaling, and instigating Th17/regulatory T-cell ratio imbalance.

Immunomodulatory Therapies for the Treatment of Graft-versus-host Disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients suffering from hematological malignancies, and its therapeutic success is based on the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are life-threatening complications after allo-HCT. To date, most of the approved treatment strategies for GvHD rely on broadly immunosuppressive regimens, which limit the beneficial GvL effect by reducing the cytotoxicity of anti-leukemia donor T-cells. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies that rely on immunomodulatory rather than only immunosuppressive effects could help to improve patient outcomes. Treatments should suppress severe GvHD while preserving anti-leukemia immunity. New treatment strategies include the blockade of T-cell activation via inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 and cluster of differentiation 28-mediated co-stimulation, reduction of proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α signaling, as well as kinase inhibition. Janus kinase (JAK)1/2 inhibition acts directly on T-cells, but also renders antigen presenting cells more tolerogenic and blocks dendritic cell-mediated T-cell activation and proliferation. Extracorporeal photopheresis, hypomethylating agent application, and low-dose IL-2 are powerful approaches to render the immune response more tolerogenic by regulatory T-cell induction. The transfer of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive cell populations, including mesenchymal stromal cells and regulatory T-cells, showed promising results in GvHD treatment. Novel experimental procedures are based on metabolic reprogramming of donor T-cells by reducing glycolysis, which is crucial for cytotoxic T-cell proliferation and activity.

Phase II Trial of Costimulation Blockade With Abatacept for Prevention of Acute GVHD

PURPOSE

Severe (grade 3-4) acute graft-versus-host disease (AGVHD) is a major cause of death after unrelated-donor (URD) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), resulting in particularly high mortality after HLA-mismatched transplantation. There are no approved agents for AGVHD prevention, underscoring the critical unmet need for novel therapeutics. ABA2 was a phase II trial to rigorously assess safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of adding T-cell costimulation blockade with abatacept to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)/methotrexate (MTX)-based GVHD prophylaxis, to test whether abatacept could decrease AGVHD.

METHODS

ABA2 enrolled adults and children with hematologic malignancies under two strata: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled stratum (8/8-HLA-matched URD), comparing CNI/MTX plus abatacept with CNI/MTX plus placebo, and a single-arm stratum (7/8-HLA-mismatched URD) comparing CNI/MTX plus abatacept versus CNI/MTX CIBMTR controls. The primary end point was day +100 grade 3-4 AGVHD, with day +180 severe-AGVHD-free-survival (SGFS) a key secondary end point. Sample sizes were calculated using a higher type-1 error (0.2) as recommended for phase II trials, and were based on predicting that abatacept would reduce grade 3-4 AGVHD from 20% to 10% (8/8s) and 30% to 10% (7/8s). ABA2 enrolled 142 recipients (8/8s, median follow-up = 716 days) and 43 recipients (7/8s, median follow-up = 708 days).

RESULTS

In 8/8s, grade 3-4 AGVHD was 6.8% (abatacept) versus 14.8% (placebo) (P = .13, hazard ratio = 0.45). SGFS was 93.2% (CNI/MTX plus abatacept) versus 82% (CNI/MTX plus placebo, P = .05). In the smaller 7/8 cohort, grade 3-4 AGVHD was 2.3% (CNI/MTX plus abatacept, intention-to-treat population), which compared favorably with a nonrandomized matched cohort of CNI/MTX (30.2%, P < .001), and the SGFS was better (97.7% v 58.7%, P < .001). Immunologic analysis revealed control of T-cell activation in abatacept-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Adding abatacept to URD HCT was safe, reduced AGVHD, and improved SGFS. These results suggest that abatacept may substantially improve AGVHD-related transplant outcomes, with a particularly beneficial impact on HLA-mismatched HCT.

Cytokines and costimulation in acute graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is an important curative therapy for high-risk hematological malignancies, but the development of severe and/or steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a significant limitation to optimal outcomes. New approaches to prevent and treat aGVHD remain an unmet need that can be best addressed by understanding the complex disease pathophysiology. It is now clear that chemoradiotherapy used prior to alloSCT induces the release of endogenous alarmins (eg, HMGB-1, ATP, IL-1α, IL-33) from recipient tissue. Exogenous pathogen-derived molecules (eg, lipopolysaccharide, nucleic acids) also translocate from the gastrointestinal tract lumen. Together, these danger signals activate antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to efficiently present alloantigen to donor T cells while releasing cytokines (eg, interleukin-12 [IL-12], IL-23, IL-6, IL-27, IL-10, transforming growth factor-β) that expand and differentiate both pathogenic and regulatory donor T cells. Concurrent costimulatory signals at the APC-T-cell interface (eg, CD80/CD86-CD28, CD40-CD40L, OX40L-OX40, CD155/CD112-DNAM-1) and subsequent coinhibitory signals (eg, CD80/CD86-CTLA4, PDL1/2-PD1, CD155/CD112-TIGIT) are critical to the acquisition of effector T-cell function and ensuing secretion of pathogenic cytokines (eg, IL-17, interferon-γ, tissue necrosis factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) and cytolytic degranulation pathway effectors (eg, perforin/granzyme). This review focuses on the combination of cytokine and costimulatory networks at the T-cell surface that culminates in effector function and subsequent aGVHD in target tissue. Together, these pathways now represent robust and clinically tractable targets for preventing the initiation of deleterious immunity after alloSCT.

Targeting the Human T-Cell Inducible COStimulator Molecule with a Monoclonal Antibody Prevents Graft-vs-Host Disease and Preserves Graft vs Leukemia in a Xenograft Murine Model

BACKGROUND

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogenic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Targeting costimulatory molecules with antagonist antibodies could dampen the excessive immune response that occurs, while preserving the beneficial graft vs leukemia (GVL) of the allogeneic response. Previous studies using a mouse model of GVHD have shown that targeting the T-cell Inducible COStimulator (ICOS, CD278) molecule is beneficial, but it is unclear whether the same applies to human cells.

METHODS

Here, we assessed whether a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to human ICOS was able to antagonize the costimulatory signal delivered in vivo to human T cells. To test this hypothesis, we used a xenogeneic model of GVHD where human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were adoptively transferred in immunocompromised NOD.SCID.gc-null mice (NSG).

RESULTS

In this model, control mice invariably lost weight and died by day 50. In contrast, 65% of the mice receiving a single injection of the anti-hICOS mAb survived beyond 100 days. Moreover, a significant improvement in survival was obtained in a curative xeno-GVHD setting. Mechanistically, administration of the anti-hICOS mAb was associated with a strong reduction in perivascular infiltrates in liver and lungs and reduction in frequencies and numbers of human T cells in the spleen. In addition, the mAb prevented T-cell expansion in the blood during xeno-GVHD. Importantly, GVHD-protected mice retained the ability to control the P815 mastocytoma cell line, mimicking GVL in humans.

CONCLUSION

A mAb-targeting human ICOS alleviated GVHD without impairing GVL in a xenograft murine model. Thus, ICOS represents a promising target in the management of BMT, preventing GVHD while preserving GVL.

Immunomodulation of Selective Naive T Cell Functions by p110δ Inactivation Improves the Outcome of Mismatched Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can treat certain hematologic malignancies due to the graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect but is complicated by graft versus host disease (GvHD). Expression of the p110δ catalytic subunit of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway is restricted to leukocytes, where it regulates proliferation, migration, and cytokine production. Here, in a mouse model of fully mismatched hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we show that genetic inactivation of p110δ in T cells leads to milder GvHD, whereas GvL is preserved. Inactivation of p110δ in human lymphocytes reduced T cell allorecognition. We demonstrate that both allostimulation and granzyme B expression were dependent on p110δ in naive T cells, which are the main mediators of GvHD, whereas memory T cells were unaffected. Strikingly, p110δ is not mandatory for either naive or memory T cells to mediate GvL. Therefore, immunomodulation of selective naive T cell functions by p110δ inactivation improves the outcome of allogeneic HSCT.

•

Genetic p110δ inactivation in donor naive T cells mitigates GvHD in mice

•

Pharmacological p110δ inactivation in human T cells reduces alloreactivity

α-1-Antitrypsin (AAT)-modified donor cells suppress GVHD but enhance the GVL effect: a role for mitochondrial bioenergetics

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is curative in many patients. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), triggered by alloreactive donor cells, has remained a major complication. Here, we show an inverse correlation between plasma α-1-antitrypsin (AAT) levels in human donors and the development of acute GVHD in the recipients (n = 111; P = .0006). In murine models, treatment of transplant donors with human AAT resulted in an increase in interleukin-10 messenger RNA and CD8(+)CD11c(+)CD205(+) major histocompatibility complex class II(+) dendritic cells (DCs), and the prevention or attenuation of acute GVHD in the recipients. Ablation of DCs (in AAT-treated CD11c-DTR donors) decreased CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells to one-third and abrogated the anti-GVHD effect. The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of donor cells (against A20 tumor cells) was maintained or even enhanced with AAT treatment of the donor, mediated by an expanded population of NK1.1(+), CD49B(+), CD122(+), CD335(+) NKG2D-expressing natural killer (NK) cells. Blockade of NKG2D significantly suppressed the GVL effect. Metabolic analysis showed a high glycolysis-high oxidative phosphorylation profile for NK1.1(+) cells, CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) T cells, and CD11c(+) DCs but not for effector T cells, suggesting a cell type-specific effect of AAT. Thus, via altered metabolism, AAT exerts effective GVHD protection while enhancing GVL effects.

In vivo T cell costimulation blockade with abatacept for acute graft-versus-host disease prevention: a first-in-disease trial

We performed a first-in-disease trial of in vivo CD28:CD80/86 costimulation blockade with abatacept for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prevention during unrelated-donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). All patients received cyclosporine/methotrexate plus 4 doses of abatacept (10 mg/kg/dose) on days -1, +5, +14, +28 post-HCT. The feasibility of adding abatacept, its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and its impact on aGVHD, infection, relapse, and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) were assessed. All patients received the planned abatacept doses, and no infusion reactions were noted. Compared with a cohort of patients not receiving abatacept (the StdRx cohort), patients enrolled in the study (the ABA cohort) demonstrated significant inhibition of early CD4(+) T cell proliferation and activation, affecting predominantly the effector memory (Tem) subpopulation, with 7- and 10-fold fewer proliferating and activated CD4(+) Tem cells, respectively, at day+28 in the ABA cohort compared with the StdRx cohort (P < .01). The ABA patients demonstrated a low rate of aGVHD, despite robust immune reconstitution, with 2 of 10 patients diagnosed with grade II-IV aGVHD before day +100, no deaths from infection, no day +100 TRM, and with 7 of 10 evaluable patients surviving (median follow-up, 16 months). These results suggest that costimulation blockade with abatacept can significantly affect CD4(+) T cell proliferation and activation post-transplantation, and may be an important adjunct to standard immunoprophylaxis for aGVHD in patients undergoing unrelated-donor HCT.

T-cell costimulatory molecules in acute-graft-versus host disease: therapeutic implications

Acute Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although this process is thought to consist of several phases, T-cell activation plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of acute GVHD. To become efficient effectors, T-cells require additional costimulation after T-cell receptor signaling. A number of molecules are involved in costimulation of T-cells such as CD28, CD40L, CD30, OX40, 4-1BB, ICOS, and LIGHT. The system is regulated by inhibitory molecules, CTLA-4, and PD-1. There is experimental evidence that those molecules are implicated in the pathogenesis of GHVD. We describe how these molecules are involved in acute GVHD and how the blockade of costimulatory molecules may have potential implications for the treatment of patients with acute GVHD.

GVHD after haploidentical transplantation: a novel, MHC-defined rhesus macaque model identifies CD28- CD8+ T cells as a reservoir of breakthrough T-cell proliferation during costimulation blockade and sirolimus-based immunosuppression

We have developed a major histocompatibility complex-defined primate model of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and have determined the effect that CD28/CD40-directed costimulation blockade and sirolimus have on this disease. Severe GVHD developed after haploidentical transplantation without prophylaxis, characterized by rapid clinical decline and widespread T-cell infiltration and organ damage. Mechanistic analysis showed activation and possible counter-regulation, with rapid T-cell expansion and accumulation of CD8(+) and CD4(+) granzyme B(+) effector cells and FoxP3(pos)/CD27(high)/CD25(pos)/CD127(low) CD4(+) T cells. CD8(+) cells down-regulated CD127 and BCl-2 and up-regulated Ki-67, consistent with a highly activated, proliferative profile. A cytokine storm also occurred, with GVHD-specific secretion of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-18, and CCL4. Costimulation Blockade and Sirolimus (CoBS) resulted in striking protection against GVHD. At the 30-day primary endpoint, CoBS-treated recipients showed 100% survival compared with no survival in untreated recipients. CoBS treatment resulted in survival, increasing from 11.6 to 62 days (P < .01) with blunting of T-cell expansion and activation. Some CoBS-treated animals did eventually develop GVHD, with both clinical and histopathologic evidence of smoldering disease. The reservoir of CoBS-resistant breakthrough immune activation included secretion of interferon-γ, IL-2, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and IL-12/IL-23 and proliferation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin-resistant CD28(-) CD8(+) T cells, suggesting adjuvant treatments targeting this subpopulation will be needed for full disease control.

Graft-versus-leukemia effect of nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is increasingly used with beneficial effects because it can be applied to older patients with hematological malignancies and those with various complications who are not suitable for conventional myeloablative stem cell transplantation (CST). Various conditioning regimens differ in their myeloablative and immunosuppressive intensity. Regardless of the type of conditioning regimen, graft-versus- host disease (GVHD) in NST occurs almost equally in CST, although a slightly delayed development of acute GVHD is observed in NST. Although graft-versus-hematological malignancy effects (i.e., graft-versus-leukemia effect, graft-versus-lymphoma effect, and graft-versus-myeloma effect) also occur in NST, completely eradicating residual malignant cells through allogeneic immune responses is insufficient in cases with rapidly growing disease or uncontrolled progressive disease. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is sometimes combined to support engraftment and to augment the graft-versus-hematological malignancy effect, such as the graft-versus-leukemia effect. DLI is especially effective for controlling relapse in the chronic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia, but not so effective against other diseases. Indeed, NST is a beneficial procedure for expanding the opportunity of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to many patients with hematological malignancies. However, a more sophisticated improvement in separating graft-versus-hematological malignancy effects from GVHD is required in the future.

Shared biology of GVHD and GVT effects: Potential methods of separation

The difficult separation of clinical graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) reflects their shared biology. Experimental approaches to mediate GVT effects while limiting GVHD include: (1) allograft T cell depletion followed by immune enhancement; (2) modulation of T cell dose or T cell subset composition; (3) donor lymphocyte infusion; (4) reduced-intensity host preparation; (5) modulation of Th1/Th2 and Tc1/Tc2 cell balance; (6) cytokine therapy or neutralization; (7) T regulatory cell therapy; (8) co-stimulatory pathway modulation; (9) chemokine pathway modulation; (10) induction of antigen-specific T cells; (11) alloreactive NK cell therapy; and (12) targeted pharmaceutical inhibition of proteosome, mammalian target of rapamycin, and histone deacetylase pathways. Clearly, a multitude of approaches exist that hold promise for separating GVT effects from GVHD. Future success in this endeavor will require a strong commitment towards translational research and continued advances in cell, vaccine, cytokine, monoclonal antibody, and targeted molecular therapy.

Interleukin 12 Is Associated with Reduced Relapse without Increased Incidence of Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Interleukin (IL)-12 has antitumor effects in murine studies. To evaluate this clinically, we investigated whether high levels of circulating IL-12 in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are associated with improved relapse-free survival. We prospectively studied 134 patients undergoing HSCT. Median follow-up was 1158 days (range, 70-1792 days). Plasma IL-12 levels were measured before transplantation and on days 0, +4, +7, and +14 after transplantation. The highest levels were seen on days +4 and +7 and were categorized by a cluster analysis of the logarithmically transformed IL-12 concentrations, which were then correlated with relapse-free survival. Forty-six patients had low levels of IL-12 (median, 2 pg/mL; range, 0-6.5 pg/mL), 49 patients had medium levels (median, 20.5 pg/mL; range, 7-75.5 pg/mL), and 25 patients had high levels (median, 181 pg/mL; range, 84-623 pg/mL). Patients with high IL-12 levels before transplantation had the highest increase after transplantation. With a multivariate Cox model for relapse onset, with the low IL-12 level as the reference, patients in the high-IL-12 group had an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.79), and medium group patients had a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.36). The incidences of relapse at 500 days by Kaplan-Meier analysis by IL-12 group were 23.0% (high group), 40.3% (medium group), and 48.8% (low group). There was no association between IL-12 levels and the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; P = .51) or chronic GVHD (P = .28). In conclusion, high IL-12 levels after HSCT are associated with improved relapse-free survival without increasing the risk for GVHD. Patients with high pretransplantation IL-12 levels have an increased likelihood of higher posttransplantation IL-12 levels, possibly because of a host-graft interaction, and this may predispose to better clinical outcomes.

Alleviation of chronic GVHD in mice by oral immuneregulation toward recipient pretransplant splenocytes does not jeopardize the graft versus leukemia effect

Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is the result of an immune-mediated attack by transplanted donor lymphocytes, entailing inflammatory damage to host target organs. Clinically, the post-bone marrow transplantation (BMT) graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect may be associated with GVHD. Immune hyporesponsiveness induced by oral antigen administration has recently been shown to prevent the development of cGVHD in a murine model. To evaluate whether amelioration of cGVHD in mice by induction of oral immune regulation in donors toward recipient pretransplant lymphocyte antigens is associated with attenuation of the GVL effect donor B10.D2 mice were fed with Balb/c splenocytes, B10.D2 splenocytes, bovine serum albumin (BSA), or regular chow, every other day for 10 days. Subsequently, transplantation of 2 x 10(7) splenocytes from donor B10.D2 mice to recipient Balb/c mice was undertaken, followed by inoculation of 3 x 10(3) BCL-1 leukemia on the day of BMT. Control groups were fed identically without leukemia inoculation. Mice were followed for survival and leukemia progression. Induction of tolerance was assessed by a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). Cutaneous GVHD was assessed macroscopically. To elucidate the mechanism of any observed effect, serum interferon (IFN), interleukin (IL-2), IL-12, IL-4, and IL-10 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry analysis for CD4+, CD8+, and NK1.1+ lymphocyte subpopulations was performed. There was no significant difference in leukemia progression manifested by survival or white blood cell counts of orally immune-regulated mice compared with control animals. Cutaneous cGVHD was significantly ameliorated in Balb/c mice transplanted from tolerized B10.D2 mice. This effect was associated with a significant reduction in the mixed lymphocyte response of effector splenocytes from tolerized B10.D2 mice against Balb/c target splenocytes; significantly decreased serum IFN-gamma and IL-2; increased serum IL-12 levels; increased peripheral NK1.1+ cells; and CD4+/CD8+ lymphocyte ratio. Oral tolerization of BMT donors toward recipient antigens ameliorates cGVHD without hampering the GVL effect.

Depletion of donor-reactive cells as a new concept for improvement of mismatched bone marrow engraftment using reduced-intensity conditioning

OBJECTIVE

New nonmyeloablative strategies to improve acceptance of mismatched bone marrow (BM) may compensate for the inadequate supply of compatible grafts. Recently we proposed to facilitate engraftment of mismatched BM by selective depletion of activated donor-reactive host cells with cyclophosphamide (CY). Here we have compared engraftment of allogeneic BM after depletion of antigen-activated host lymphocytes by CY, with BM engraftment following general immunosuppression by the same CY dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Naive or mildly irradiated BALB/c mice were primed with C57BL/6 BM cells (day 0), treated with CY in order to deplete activated T cells (day 1), and transplanted with a second C57BL/6 BM inoculum (day 2) in order to achieve BM engraftment. Alternatively, mice received an equal dose of donor BM cells in a single injection one day after the same CY dose. Treated animals were repeatedly tested for persistence of donor cells in the blood.

RESULTS

Depletion of alloantigen-primed lymphocytes by 200 mg/kg CY provided stable GVHD-free engraftment of allogeneic BM in nonirradiated mice, while immunosuppressive treatment with the same CY dose alone resulted in BM rejection. Low-dose irradiation before priming with donor BM allowed the tolerance-inducing CY dose to be reduced to 100 mg/kg. Alloantigen-primed lymphocyte depletion (APLD) by a reduced CY dose resulted in engraftment of donor BM after a significantly lower irradiation dose than treatment with irradiation and CY alone.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that conditioning that focuses on APLD has a definite advantage over general immunosuppression with CY and radiation therapy.

New strategies for prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease and for induction of graft-versus-leukemia effects

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continues to be a problem in allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation; however, our understanding of the basic pathophysiology of GVHD has improved. Although not all data obtained from murine or other animal models can be extrapolated to the clinic, there are leads that deserve to be pursued. The skin, intestinal tract, and liver are the 3 major target organs of GVHD and share the feature of presenting a barrier to the "environment" of the host. There is evidence that the damage inflicted to these organs, the epithelial and endothelial cells in particular, by the conditioning regimen causes a release of various cytokines and a penetration of endotoxin into the systemic circulation. According to these observations, the nonimmunologic aspects of GVHD have been likened to an inflammatory process. If this characterization is valid, blocking these nonspecific inflammatory changes would ameliorate GVHD without interfering with the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reaction. In fact, one study has shown a substantial amelioration of GVHD with a molecule that directly blocks endotoxin. Clinical data also suggest that patients with organ dysfunction early after transplantation that is presumed to be treatment related may benefit from preemptive interventions aimed at controlling GVHD. Furthermore, there is growing evidence that the mechanisms involved in GVHD may differ from organ to organ (for example, Fas/Fas-ligand interactions in the liver versus tumor necrosis factor alpha/receptor interactions in the intestinal tract), and from a therapeutic point of view, the time of onset of clinical GVHD may be important in choosing the appropriate therapy. Thus, combinations of interventions chosen and timed appropriately may be more effective in preventing and managing GVHD than are the standard across-the-board approaches that have been used so far. Such a strategy may also be successful in maintaining a GVL effect and possibly in incorporating direct antileukemic therapy, such as the use of cytotoxic T-cells directed at minor histocompatibility antigens, without increasing the risk of GVHD. The development of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens and the observations on GVHD kinetics and the progression or eradication of leukemia with that strategy are likely to add new insights into how one can optimally combine various modalities to achieve engraftment, prevent GVHD, and at the same time maintain a GVL effect.