Glandular lesions of the cervix-cytological and histological correlation

The abnormal glandular smear: cytologic prediction, colposcopic correlation and clinical management

We reviewed recent cytological reporting of abnormal glandular cells on cervical smears in order to assess the predictive value of these reports and the contribution of colposcopy in the assessment of these abnormalities. The study consisted of a 5-year retrospective review of the clinical management of 80 women with abnormal glandular cells on a cervical smear, with clinical and histopathological data available for review in the interval 1992-1996. There were two groups of women: (i) those referred with gynaecological symptoms and (ii) those with screen detected abnormalities who were asymptomatic and significantly younger than the first group. The predictive value of a glandular smear for malignancy was 42.5% and for premalignancy 28.8%. The most common lesions detected were cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (13), endometrial cancer (13), cervical adenocarcinoma (10) and cervical intraepithelial glandular neoplasia (CIGN) (8). Four cases of endometrial carcinoma presented through screening. In the remainder a variety of benign conditions were identified as responsible for the abnormal smear. Failure to find an explanation for the abnormal smear only occurred in 8.8%. In developing a protocol for abnormal glandular smears, our observations indicate that: (a) those with abnormal bleeding require endometrial sampling; (b) for those with screen detected abnormality, colposcopy is valuable as it is a sensitive predictor of early invasion and can predict glandular abnormality; (c)diseases of the entire genital tract, non-gynaecological viscera and metastatic cancer can generate cytological abnormality; (d) screen detected borderline abnormality in endocervical cells is associated with CIN III.

The pathology and management of endocervical glandular neoplasia

The incidence of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma is rising, and our limited knowledge about these lesions presents the gynecologist with a management dilemma. Recently, pathologists have paid increasing attention to the diagnosis and pathogenesis of adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Although there is no uniformity in the management of these lesions, nonradical surgery appears to give satisfactory results especially in young women who want to preserve their fertility. This review focuses on the issues surrounding the histologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular abnormalities, including their classification, and discusses the management of cervical preinvasive glandular disease, including follow-up after treatment.

Atypical glandular cells in conventional cervical smears: incidence and follow-up

BACKGROUND

Atypical glandular cells on cervical smears are often associated with clinically significant uterine lesions. The frequency and accuracy of AGC-NOS (i.e. atypical glandular cells, not otherwise specified) diagnoses, regardless of the gland cell type or the degree of suspicion, and their outcome were investigated.

METHODS

From January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1999 a total of 261 patients had an AGC-NOS diagnosis made by conventional cervical Papanicolaou smear interpretation representing 0.05% of all Pap-smears analyzed at the national level. 191 (73.2%) patients had a subsequent histological examination, 8 samples were not representative by origin and were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of 183 AGC-NOS diagnosed, 56.3% (103/183) were associated with tissue-proven precancerous and/or cancerous lesions, 44% being of endocervical and 56% of endometrial origin. 75% of all AGC-patients were asymptomatic. 66.7% (6/9) of the patients with subsequent invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma (AC) and 56% (28/50) of those patients with invasive endometrial AC were without clinical symptoms. 3 patients out of 9 with an invasive endocervical AC were 35 years of age or less. 10.1% and 12.3% of all 'new' tissue-proven invasive endocervical or endometrial AC respectively recorded by the national Morphologic Tumour Registry (MTR) were first identified by a cytological AGC-NOS diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings emphasize the importance of the cytological AGC-category even in the absence of a precise origin or cell type specification. 56% of the AGC-diagnoses being associated with significant cancerous or precancerous conditions, a complete and careful evaluation is required.

Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to determine the accuracy of routinely screened cervical smears to predict a glandular cell lesion in histologically confirmed cases of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), invasive adenocarcinoma (ADCA), adenosquamous carcinoma (ADSQCA), and severe combined glandular and squamous cell lesions.

METHODS

Between 1989-2000, a total of 1,141 women with a histologic diagnosis of cervical AIS, ADCA, ADSQCA, and combined lesions (glandular cell lesion with a coexistent squamous cell lesion) were registered in the Dutch National Pathology Archive (PALGA). In 1054 of these 1,141 histologic cases, an additional conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear diagnosis was registered from the same patient. Material was evaluated with regard to the accuracy of cytologic diagnosis, the percentage of combined lesions, the mean age of the patients, and the time interval between AIS and ADCA.

RESULTS

Of 1,141 registered histologic cases, 57.5% were registered as having an "intraepithelial" lesion, whereas 42.5% were registered as having an "invasive" process. A combined process was diagnosed in 63.2% of cases. From the same patients, a cytologic diagnosis of a severe cervical epithelial lesion was registered in PALGA for 91.2% (n = 961) of 1054 cases. A cytologic registration of a severe glandular cell lesion (with or without a squamous cell component) was made in 547 cases (51.9%). Prediction of a severe glandular cell lesion on the Pap smear was found to be more accurate in cases of histologically confirmed pure glandular cell abnormalities than in cases with a histologic diagnosis of a combined lesion. The cytologic prediction was found to be correct in 75.2% of cases of pure AIS and 47.3% of cases of AIS with coexistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) (cervical intraepithelial lesion [CIN] type 2 [CIN 2] or CIN 3). The mean ages of the patients with AIS and AIS + HGSIL were 37.3 years and 34 years, respectively, whereas the mean age of the patients with ADCA and ADCA + HGSIL was 41.9 years and 38.1 years, respectively. The interval between the average ages of patients with AIS and ADCA and those with AIS + HGSIL and ADCA + HGSIL was 4.6 years and 4.1 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of a data search of the PALGA registry, it can be concluded that in a relatively large number of cases a severe cervical glandular cell lesion was not diagnosed on the Pap smear. Furthermore, data demonstrated that the prediction of a glandular abnormality is less accurate in cases of combined squamoglandular cell lesions than in pure glandular cell lesions.

How significant is a cervical smear showing glandular dyskaryosis?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, outcome and predictive value of cytology showing glandular dyskaryosis.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-seven women with a smear diagnosis of glandular dyskaryosis registered between January 1997 and December 2001.

SETTING

Colposcopy and cytopathology units in a large district general hospital.

RESULTS

Sixty smears in 57 women showing glandular dyskaryosis were identified from a cohort of 135,120 smears, giving an incidence of 0.05%. Hospital records were available for 50 women. Final diagnosis included 13 cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN), 4 microinvasive cervical adenocarcinomas, 2 undifferentiated tumours, 1 microinvasive squamous carcinoma, 21 cases of CIN and 13 cases of endometrial pathology (8 endometrial cancers). Twelve women had coexistent squamous and glandular disease. Forty-five out of 50 women had significant pathology (positive predictive value 90%). Colposcopy was seen to be of limited value in assessment of smears showing glandular dyskaryosis. Only 1 out of 13 glandular lesions was diagnosed by colposcopy.

CONCLUSION

Smears showing glandular dyskaryosis are associated with significant pathology in 90% of cases and malignancy in 32% of cases. Hence, women with a smear showing glandular dyskaryosis should be referred urgently to a colposcopy clinic and flagged up as suspected cancer. Glandular dyskaryosis should be included in the national referral criteria for suspected gynaecological cancer.

Cytology suggestive of glandular neoplasia: outcomes and suggested management

Eighty-three cases having a cervical smear result showing abnormal glandular cells were identified and matched up with the diagnostic histology result. Thirty-four (41.0%) were associated with malignancy and 26 (31.3%) with a cervical intraepithelial lesion without invasion. Thirty-eight (45.8%) had conditions of the cervix as follows: 12 cases had invasive disease of the cervix; nine (10.8%) adenocarcinoma of cervix and three (3.6%) squamous carcinoma of cervix. Nineteen (22.9%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN/SIL) alone and seven (8.4%) had cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) +/- CIN. There were 16 (19.3%) cases with malignancies of the uterine corpus and six (7.2%) had a malignancy arising from another primary site. Twenty-three (27.7%) had no malignant or pre-malignant condition. The risk of malignancy was related to age and ranged from 18.2% in those under 35 years to 67.9% in those 55 years and over. A protocol for the management of these cases is described.

A clinical review of borderline glandular cells on cervical cytology

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnoses and diagnostic pathway of women presenting with borderline glandular cells on cervical cytology. To outline the basis of clinical approach of these women.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

POPULATION

Forty-three women referred to the hospital department over a 32-month period.

METHODS

Review of the casenotes for the demographic data, previous cervical cytology and/or histology report, indication for the smear resulting in borderline glandular cells, colposcopic findings, diagnostic and/or treatment procedures, final diagnosis and current status.

RESULTS

The average age was 36.7 years. Twenty-four women (56%) had clinically significant lesions: seven women (16%) presented with cancers, of which one was endometrial in origin, and 17 (40%) with intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN and cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)). Sixty-seven percent of all clinically significant lesions were of squamous origin. Thirty-seven had histological diagnosis, while six went on to cytological surveillance. Colposcopy was the most significant predictor for clinically significant lesions (P < 0.05). Punch biopsies and loop excisions were diagnostic when based on abnormal colposcopic findings. Brush cytology was appropriate follow up for asymptomatic, premenopausal women with no colposcopic abnormality. In addition, endometrial sampling was recommended in the peri- and postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSION

Borderline glandular cells have a high incidence of clinically significant lesions. Immediate referral for colposcopy and assessment is strongly recommended in women with two borderline glandular smears to avoid delays in potential cancer diagnosis.

Relation of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia to microinvasive and invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a study of 121 cases

AIMS

To examine the relation between invasive adenocarcinoma and its alleged precursor, cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN), and to assess the management and outcome of CGIN and the validity of using the term "microinvasive adenocarcinoma."

METHODS

The clinical and pathological features of 121 cases of glandular neoplasia of the cervix diagnosed between the years 1990 to 1995 were examined for the following: histological diagnosis, smear records, type of treatment, the association between the precursor lesions and invasive disease, and follow up.

RESULTS

27 cases were identified as low grade CGIN (L-CGIN) and 38 as high grade CGIN (H-CGIN), 10 as microinvasive adenocarcinoma (less than 5 mm in depth), and 46 as invasive adenocarcinoma. The ratio of non-invasive to invasive disease was 1.12:1. The mean age of women was 39, 43, 43, and 48 years for L-CGIN, H-CGIN, microinvasive, and invasive adenocarcinoma, respectively. L-CGIN was seen in 13% and 18% of H-CGIN and microinvasive disease, respectively. H-CGIN was seen in 100% of microinvasive and 26% of invasive adenocarcinomas. The available smears before diagnosis predicted 59% of L-CGIN, 70% of H-CIGN, 100% of microinvasive adenocarcinoma, and 32% of invasive adenocarcinomas. Treatment of 74% of L-CGIN, 52% of H-CIGN, and 10% of microinvasive adenocarcinoma was by diathermy loop excision only. The remaining cases had hysterectomy. Residual disease was found in 43%, 50%, and 33% of hysterectomies for L-CGIN, H-CGIN, and microinvasive adenocarcinoma, respectively. This is correlated with positive margins, or disease within 3 mm of margins on loop specimens. Cervical smear follow up for two to seven years revealed no recurrence of glandular lesions in any of the cases of CGIN or microinvasive adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Precursor glandular lesions tend to progress to invasive carcinoma. There is a progressive increase in age of patients from L-CGIN to invasive disease, a span of approximately 10 years. There is a high association between H-CGIN and invasive disease. In the management of such alleged precursors, it is important to ensure adequate free margins of at least 3 mm. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma appears to have an excellent prognosis if treated by hysterectomy.

Follow-up of atypical glandular cells in cervical-endocervical smears

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) is a diagnostic category of the Bethesda system encompassing glandular-type cells that show either endometrial or endocervical differentiation and display greater atypia than expected for a reactive process but do not meet the criteria for invasive adenocarcinoma. We investigated AGUS in a follow-up study of cervical-endocervical smears with either histology or repeat cytology follow-up. From the cytology files at Northwestern Memorial Hospital over a 4-year period, 136 cervical-endocervical smears were diagnosed with AGUS, which were further subdivided into atypical glandular cells, unqualified (AGC-U); atypical glandular cells, favor reactive (AGC-FR); or atypical glandular cells, favor neoplasia (AGC-FN). Of 96 cases with either histologic or cytologic (cervical-endocervical smear) follow-up, 39 cases of AGC-U had a variety of diagnoses on follow-up, with mostly benign entities in 72% and squamous intraepithelial lesions in 28%. Follow-up of the 36 cases of AGC-FR also demonstrated mostly benign entities (82%) and five cases of squamous intraepithelial lesions. The largest number of premalignant and malignant diagnoses (48%) was found during follow-up of patients with an initial diagnosis of AGC-FN, including the only two cases of adenocarcinoma in situ in our study. In conclusion, our study confirms that AGUS encompasses a wide spectrum of diagnoses, most of which prove to be benign. Subclassification of these cases into "favor reactive" and "favor neoplasia" was found to be helpful in predicting the follow-up status of these patients. However, the small but distinctive percentage of preneoplastic and neoplastic diagnoses seen on follow-up warrant further diagnostic procedures and/or close monitoring in patients with this diagnosis.