Summary of a workshop on potency and dosage of von Willebrand factor concentrates

Current challenges in the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited von Willebrand's disease in Italy: an Expert Meeting Report on the diagnosis and surgical and secondary long-term prophylaxis

Recent advances in the care of von Willebrand's disease (vWD) have allowed the majority of patients to be managed adequately. Even in the more severe forms, it is now possible to control recurrent bleeding through secondary long-term prophylaxis with von Willebrand factor-containing concentrates. Moreover, in the setting of surgical prophylaxis, the combination of interdisciplinary management and close patient monitoring yields a positive outcome in nearly all cases, although safety concerns remain. In clinical practice, the effectiveness of therapy is hindered by the difficulties in making a rapid, yet accurate diagnosis, in identifying the subgroup of bleeders who may benefit most from a specific strategy, and in selecting the optimal product and regimen.Since specific guidelines for heavy bleeders requiring short- and long-term prophylaxis are still lacking, sharing the experience of experts dealing with vWD patients on a daily basis is crucial to fill gaps in information relating to patient management. To address this important issue, 13 Italian haematologists met in Milan on April, 2, 2016 and in Florence on July, 9, 2016. A 30-question survey constituted the input to discuss (i) optimisation of the diagnostic workflow for vWD, (ii) the characteristics of patients who may benefit from secondary long-term prophylaxis (in particular with the purified von Willebrand factor concentrate with a low content of factor VIII), (iii) the key elements to consider when selecting a concentrate and (iv) the pre-operative and post-operative management of vWD patients. A summary of the main points covered is provided in this report.

Von Willebrand disease: an overview

Most commonly inherited bleeding disorder, first described in Aland Islands by Erik von Willebrand. It occurs as a result of decrease in plasma levels or defect in von Willebrand factor which is a large multimeric glycoprotein. Monomers of this glycoprotein undergo N-glycosylation to form dimers which get arranged to give multimers. Binding with plasma proteins (especially factor VIII) is the main function of von Willebrand factor. The disease is of two forms: Inherited and acquired forms. Inherited forms are of three major types. They are type 1, type 2, and type 3; in which type 2 is sub-divided into 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N. Type 1 is more prevalent than all other types. Mucocutaneous bleeding is mild in type 1 whereas it is mild to moderate in types 2A, 2B, and 2M. Type 2N has similar symptoms of haemophilia. The pathophysiology of each type depends on the qualitative or quantitative defects in von Willebrand factor. The diagnosis is based on von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor activity assay, FVIII coagulant activity and some other additional tests. Results should be analyzed within the context of blood group. von Willebrand factor multimer analysis is essential for typing and sub typing the disease. The management of the disease involves replacement therapy, non-replacement therapy and other therapies that include antifibrinolytics and topical agents.

Presurgical pharmacokinetic analysis of a von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate in patients with von Willebrand's disease (VWD) has limited value in dosing for surgery

Optimal doses of von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrates for surgical procedures in patients with VWD need to be determined. A prospective, multicenter study was performed that included an initial pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment following a standard dose of VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate-P®) to determine individual PK parameters and guide therapeutic dosing during surgery. Forty one subjects received 60 IU kg⁻¹ VWF: RCo. Median plasma levels, half-life, mean change from baseline and in vivo recovery (IVR) values were determined for VWF:RCo, VWF:Ag, and FVIII: C, and area under the plasma time-concentration curve (AUC), mean residence time (MRT), clearance, volume of distribution and dose linearity were also assessed for VWF:RCo at various time points. Median baseline VWF:RCo level was 13 IU dL⁻¹ (range, 6-124); with a mean change from baseline >100 IU dL⁻¹ immediately after the infusion, decreasing to 10 IU dL⁻¹ at 48 h postinfusion. The group median incremental in vivo recovery (IVR) for VWF:RCo was 2.4 IU dL⁻¹ per IU kg⁻¹, for VWF:Ag 2.3 IU dL⁻¹ kg⁻¹ and for FVIII:C was 2.7 IU dL⁻¹ per IU kg⁻¹. When analysing individual recovery values on repeated infusions, a very weak correlation was observed between presurgery IVR and IVR for both VWF:RCo and FVIII, measured at various times just prior to and after the surgical procedure. Although group median values were fairly consistent among repeated IVR measurements, the intra-individual IVR values for FVIII and VWF:RCo with repeated infusions showed a large degree of variability. IVR values obtained from pharmacokinetic analyses performed in advance of anticipated surgery do not reliably predict postinfusion circulating levels of VWF:RCo or FVIII attained preoperatively or with subsequent peri-operative infusions.

Von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrates in the treatment of von Willebrand disease

Therapy for von Willebrand disease (VWD) aims to restore the hemostatic function conferred by von Willebrand factor (VWF), which facilitates platelet adhesion and aggregation, and serves to increase potentially low coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma. In patients unresponsive to desmopressin (DDAVP), the preferred treatment is with plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates. Only a few of the available VWF/FVIII concentrates have been licensed for use in VWD based on prospective studies. The efficacy of VWF/FVIII concentrates depends on the content and quality of VWF and FVIII. Several studies have demonstrated the variability of the VWF contents, as well as the differences in the VWF multimer patterns (including the high molecular weight VWF multimers that are most effective in restoring hemostasis), among these concentrates. Treating physicians should be aware of these disparities and the potential clinical implications for patients with different VWD subtypes. Dosing has traditionally been calculated based on the FVIII content of the products, although dosing based on VWF functional activity [e.g., VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo)] addresses the primary protein deficiency in VWD patients. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of concentrates dosed according to VWF:RCo. Dosing is generally consistent across VWD subtypes, although patients with severe phenotypes or undergoing major procedures may require more infusions or longer treatment duration. Other considerations for the use of VWF-containing concentrates include laboratory monitoring of efficacy and safety issues such as thrombosis risk and thromboprophylaxis.

von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate (Haemate P) dosing based on pharmacokinetics: a prospective multicenter trial in elective surgery

BACKGROUND

While plasma-derived concentrates containing large amounts of von Willebrand factor (VWF) are effective in treating von Willebrand disease (VWD), optimal dosing remains to be fully characterized.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility of dosing Haemate P VWF/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate based on pharmacokinetics (PK) in the management of surgical subjects with VWD.

METHODS

VWD subjects scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled in a prospective multicenter open-label cohort study. A pre-operative loading dose of VWF/FVIII concentrate based upon prior individual subject PK analysis was administered followed by postoperative therapeutic/maintenance infusions.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight subjects with types 1, 2A or 3 VWD and one with type 2 M were enrolled. Median in vivo recovery of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) was 1.9 IU dL(-1) (IU kg(-1))(-1) with an interquartile range (IQR) of 1.6-2.5 IU dL(-1) (IU kg(-1))(-1). Median response, half-life and clearance were 74.0% (IQR, 55.5-100%), 15.6 h (IQR, 9.0-28.4 h) and 3.26 mL kg(-1) h(-1) (IQR, 2.29-5.21 mL kg(-1) h(-1)), respectively. A PK-guided median VWF:RCo loading dose of 62.4 IU kg(-1) (IQR, 50.1-87.0 IU kg(-1)) was administered. Postoperative mean trough VWF:RCo levels of 62-73 IU dL(-1) were sufficient to prevent bleeding. Investigators rated hemostasis excellent or good in 96.3% of subjects on the day of surgery and 100% on the next day and on day 14. A subject with multiple risk factors developed pulmonary embolism, which resolved without sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Haemate P provided effective and safe hemostasis in VWD subjects undergoing elective surgery. Selection of Haemate P loading dose on the basis of VWF PK proved feasible.

Pharmacokinetic studies on Wilfactin, a von Willebrand factor concentrate with a low factor VIII content treated with three virus-inactivation/removal methods

OBJECTIVE

In order to correct the primary von Willebrand factor (VWF) defect and avoid supra-physiologic plasma levels of factor VIII, a pure VWF concentrate almost devoid of FVIII was developed and used in France since 1989.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the most recent version of this concentrate (Wilfactin; LFB, Les Ulis, France), treated with three virus-inactivation/removal methods (solvent/detergent, 35 nm filtration, dry heat treatment), was investigated in 25 patients. Seventeen patients with various types of clinically severe von Willebrand disease (VWD) were included in a crossover, randomized trial carried out in five European centers and comparing Wilfactin with concentrates containing both FVIII and VWF (FVIII/VWF). Eight type 3 VWD patients were included in another trial carried out in six French centers comparing Wilfactin with its previous version (Facteur Willebrand-LFB; LFB) that adopted one virus-inactivation method only.

RESULTS

For both the measurements evaluated in this study (VWF antigen, VWF:Ag; and VWF ristocetin co-factor activity, VWF:RCo), Wilfactin had a PK profile similar to that of the FVIII/VWF concentrates and of Facteur Willebrand-LFB. VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag recoveries were 2.1 +/- 0.3 and 1.8 +/- 0.3 per IU kg(-1), respectively, and the half-lives were 12.4 +/- 1.8 and 15.9 +/- 1.5 h. The FVIII synthesis rate was 5.8 +/- 1.0 IU dL(-1) h(-1), with a half-life of 15.8 +/- 2.4 h.

CONCLUSION

The PK of VWF and FVIII have not been altered by the three virus-inactivation/removal steps during the manufacturing of Wilfactin.

Advances in the therapy of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a very common autosomal inherited bleeding disorder, caused by a quantitative deficiency or a qualitative structural defect of von Willebrand factor (vWF). Two main therapeutic options are available for the treatment of spontaneous bleeding episodes and for prevention of bleeding: desmopressin (DDAVP) and replacement therapy with plasma products. DDAVP is the treatment of choice for most patients with type 1 vWD. In patients with the type 3 disease and in most subjects with type 2 disease, DDAVP alone is ineffective or contraindicated, and it is usually necessary to switch to plasma concentrates containing both factor VIII (FVIII) and vWF. Concentrates subjected to virucidal treatment (e.g. solvent/detergent treatment) during manufacture should always be used in preference to cryoprecipitate. A recombinant vWF concentrate is now undergoing preclinical development and preliminary data suggest it possesses good haemostatic function and may correct the bleeding in vWD after its administration in several animal models. Although treatment of vWD is relatively simple (assuming access to even basic laboratory facilities), actual diagnosis is often far from straightforward, and the patients should be well characterized phenotypically to tailor the treatment to the different types and subtypes of the disease. It is probably wise to refer samples for the characterization to expert laboratories.

Treatment of von Willebrand disease with a high-purity factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate: a prospective, multicenter study

Among patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) who are unresponsive to desmopressin therapy, replacement with plasma-derived concentrates is the treatment of choice. Because prospective studies are lacking, such treatment has been largely empirical. A multicenter, prospective study has been conducted in 81 patients with VWD (15 patients with type 1, 34 with type 2, and 32 with type 3 disease) to investigate the efficacy of a high-purity factor VIII/von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF) concentrate for treatment of bleeding and surgical prophylaxis. Two preparations of the concentrate-one virally inactivated with solvent detergent, the other with an additional heat-treatment step--were evaluated. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for both preparations. Using pre-established dosages based on the results of pharmacokinetic studies, 53 patients were administered either preparation for the treatment of 87 bleeding episodes, and 39 patients were treated prophylactically for 71 surgical or invasive procedures. Sixty-five (74.7%) and 10 (11.5%) of the bleeding episodes were controlled with 1 or 2 infusions, respectively. Patients with severe type 3 VWD typically required more infusions and higher doses, at shorter time intervals, than did patients with generally milder types 1 and 2. Among patients undergoing surgical procedures, blood loss was lower than that predicted prospectively, and losses exceeding the predicted value did not correlate with the postinfusion skin bleeding time. In conclusion, the concentrate effectively stopped active bleeding and provided adequate hemostasis for surgical or invasive procedures, even in the absence of bleeding time correction.

Transfusion medicine management for reconstructive spinal repair in a patient with von Willebrand's disease and a history of heavy surgical bleeding

STUDY DESIGN

A case report of a multidisciplinary approach to a second reconstructive back surgery in a patient with von Willebrand's disease, flatback syndrome, and a history of heavy surgical bleeding is presented.

OBJECTIVE

To review the perioperative planning and assessment of hemostasis and transfusion medicine management, including administration of Humate P, a Factor VIII preparation with high von Willebrand factor content.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Reconstructive spinal procedures may require significant transfusion support even in patients with normal preoperative hemostasis. In addition to the hemostatic problem caused by von Willebrand's disease, the reported patient requested minimal exposure to allogeneic blood products because of hepatitis C infection acquired from previous transfusions.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary team included the patient, hematologist, blood bank medical director, anesthesiologist, and operating surgeon. Preoperative assessment showed a Type 2A von Willebrand's disease variant. A careful planning process included a test infusion of desmopressin and extensive autologous donations of red cells, plasma, and platelets, which were collected before the procedure.

RESULTS

Anterior and posterior spine fusions were performed during a 14-hour procedure. Hemostasis and clinical response were excellent. Humate P was administered perioperatively as assessed by the baseline Factor VIII and von Willebrand's disease levels, the plasma volume, the half-life of infused Humate P, and the anticipated risk and tolerance for bleeding. The estimated blood loss was 5 L. Replacement included 9 units of autologous red cells, 6 units of autologous plasma, 2 autologous plateletpheresis collections, a single allogeneic plateletpheresis product, and 17,000 units of Humate P administered over the perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a careful multidisciplinary approach, excellent hemostasis can be achieved with minimal exposure to untreated allogeneic blood products during aggressive spinal surgery in a patient with a clinically significant congenital coagulopathy.

Early transfusion of factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrates seems to be effective in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with von Willebrand type III disease

The association between gastrointestinal angiodysplasia and von Willebrand disease was reported 30 years ago. The clinical course of patients with von Willebrand disease and angiodysplasia is characterized by numerous admissions to hospital for gastrointestinal bleeding necessitating transfusion with packed red cells, factor VIII and plasma. The management of these patients is problematic. Numerous treatments for the gastrointestinal bleeding have been proposed: surgery, electrocoagulation, laser photocoagulation, sclerotherapy, arteriography with embolization, immunoglobulins, oestrogens, and octreotide, but no treatment modality has been successful in all cases. We report a 66-year-old-female with small bowel angiodysplasia and von Willebrand type III disease in whom prompt administration of factor VIII/vWF concentrates was effective. Education of patients to recognize minimal gastrointestinal bleeding manifestations, periodical clinical visits and early infusion of factor VIII/vWF seems to be fundamental for the success of this therapy. A longer follow-up and the study of other patients are needed to confirm our observation.

How I treat patients with von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a frequent inherited disorder of hemostasis that affects both sexes. Two abnormalities are characteristic of the disease, which is caused by a deficiency or a defect in the multimeric glycoprotein called von Willebrand factor: low platelet adhesion to injured blood vessels and defective intrinsic coagulation owing to low plasma levels of factor VIII. There are 2 main options available for the treatment of spontaneous bleeding episodes and for bleeding prophylaxis: desmopressin and transfusional therapy with plasma products. Desmopressin is the treatment of choice for most patients with type 1 vWD, who account for approximately 70% to 80% of cases. This nontransfusional hemostatic agent raises endogenous factor VIII and von Willebrand factor 3 to 5 times and thereby corrects both the intrinsic coagulation and the primary hemostasis defects. In patients with the more severe type 3 and in most patients with type 2 disease, desmopressin is ineffective or is contraindicated and it is usually necessary to resort to plasma concentrates containing both factor VIII and von Willebrand factor. Concentrates treated with virucidal methods should be preferred to cryoprecipitate because they are equally effective and are perceived as safer. (Blood. 2001;97:1915-1919)

Use of ristocetin cofactor activity in the management of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (vWD), the most common of the hereditary bleeding disorders, arises from quantitative or qualitative defects in von Willebrand factor (vWF). vWF is a multimeric plasma protein that plays a key role in primary and secondary haemostasis. In the current classification scheme, vWD is divided into six subtypes that are based on the nature of the vWF defect. Therapeutic strategies depend on the accurate identification of these subtypes. In most clinical situations, desmopressin is effective treatment for the great majority of patients with mild (type 1) disease, while replacement therapy with factor VIII/vWF concentrates that contain high levels of vWF activity is required for most type 2 and nearly all type 3 vWD patients. Several factor VIII/vWF replacement products are available, one of which (Humate P) has been approved for the treatment of vWD by the US Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary results of recent studies support the hypothesis that treatment with factor VIII/vWF concentrates based upon the content of vWF activity as reflected in the ristocetin cofactor assay is practicable, safe and efficacious. The establishment of optimal treatment regimens with respect to dose intensity and duration will require further study.

von Willebrand disease and pregnancy

von Willebrand Disease (vWD) affects approximately 1% of Americans and as many as 25% of women referred for evaluation of menorrhagia. We briefly review the history of vWD, its molecular defects, and diagnostic criteria for each subtype of disease. We also address obstetric management of the patient with vWD. While there is a significant increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage, patients with vWD should not be discouraged to undertake pregnancy.