Poor response to interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-infected haemophiliacs

Characteristics and Prospects for Hepatitis C Therapy of an HIV-HCV Coinfected Population Followed at a Reference HIV Center

PURPOSE

A cross-sectional study was performed during 2004 at a large HIV clinic in Spain to identify HIV-HCV coinfected individuals who might be candidates for HCV therapy.

METHOD

Plasma HCV RNA levels were measured in 405 anti-HCV antibody positive patients. Spontaneous HCV clearance had occurred in 11.4%. Overall, 165 (40.1%) of HCV-HIV coinfected patients had already been exposed to interferon (IFN)-based therapies. Excluding those currently on treatment, the majority of them had either failed (64/142; 45.1%) or not completed therapy (25/142; 17.6%). Other 103 (25.4%) chronic HCV carriers refused treatment or were not considered as appropriate candidates, most often due to low CD4 counts or severe neuropsychiatric conditions. Treatment was deemed feasible and planned in the near future in 91 (22.5%) patients. Unfavorable HCV genotypes (1 and 4) were significantly more frequent in this group of individuals ready for HCV treatment compared to those who had cleared HCV in the past following IFN-based therapies.

RESULTS

Spontaneous clearance of the HCV infection was low in HIV-coinfected patients. One third of our HIV-HCV coinfected population had already been exposed to HCV therapy, but only a minority had achieved sustained HCV clearance. Half of patients with active HCV replication never exposed to IFN were not considered as appropriate candidates for HCV therapy.

CONCLUSION

More flexible criteria would considerably increase the number of patients to be treated with IFN-based therapy. The majority of patients ready to initiate HCV therapy have a poor therapeutic profile.

Influence of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 coinfection on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) may worsen the clinical course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to investigate whether HTLV-1 coinfection influences the clinical characteristics of patients with HCV infection.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 523 consecutive patients from January 2001 to December 2010 with chronic liver disease due to HCV infection, in whom serum anti-HTLV-1 antibodies were examined. Among these patients, 265 were diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

RESULTS

The seroprevalence of anti-HTLV-1 antibodies was significantly higher in patients with HCC (21.1%) than those without HCC (10.5%, P = 0.001). This significant difference was observed in female patients (29.5 vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001), but not in male patients (16.5 vs. 12.9%, P = 0.501). In multivariate analysis, anti-HTLV-1 antibody positivity was independently associated with HCC in female patients [odds ratio (OR), 5.029; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.760-14.369; P = 0.003], in addition to age (≥65 years; OR, 10.297; 95% CI, 4.322-24.533; P < 0.001), platelet count (<15 × 10(4)/μL; OR, 2.715; 95% CI, 1.050-7.017; P = 0.039), total bilirubin (≥1 mg/dL; OR, 3.155; 95% CI, 1.365-7.292; P = 0.007), and total cholesterol (≤160 mg/dL; OR, 2.916; 95% CI, 1.341-6.342; P = 0.007). In contrast, HTLV-1 coinfection was not associated with HCC in male patients, although age, alcohol consumption, platelet count, and albumin were independently associated with HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

HTLV-1 coinfection may contribute to the development of HCC in patients with chronic HCV infection, especially in females.

Mutations in two PKR-binding domains in chronic hepatitis C of genotype 3a and correlation with viral loads and interferon responsiveness

Interferon (IFN) induces the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) to inhibit viral replication. Two motifs of the PKR-binding domain exist in the E2 and the NS5A regions of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). These regions are called the PKR-eukaryotic transcription factor (elF2-alpha) phosphorylation homology domain (PePHD), and the IFN sensitivity-determining region (ISDR). Both regions are inhibited by PKR. Thus, several studies have reported the relationship between these regions and IFN responsiveness and the HCV viral load. However, the data obtained from these studies remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the genomic heterogeneity of the PePHD and the ISDR in patients with genotype 3a and how this impacts HCV replication and the response to IFN therapy. Twenty-one male patients infected with HCV genotype 3a were studied. The PePHD was well conserved, and mutations were found in only one amino acid position in two patients. Patients with three or more mutations in the ISDR had lower viral loads than those with fewer than two mutations (192.2 ± 176.7 vs. 1279.4 ± 997.6 KIU/ml, P = 0.0277). Ten (71.4%) of 14 patients achieved a sustained virological response to IFN therapy. No specific amino acid substitutions in the PePHD and the ISDR were associated with IFN responsiveness; however, the number of mutations in the ISDR was significantly associated with the HCV viral load. The findings from this study suggest that the ISDR plays an important role in regulating viral replication in patients infected with HCV genotype 3a.

Hepatitis C viral kinetics during treatment with peg IFN-alpha-2b in HIV/HCV coinfected patients as a function of baseline CD4+ T-cell counts

BACKGROUND

HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected patients are known to have lower sustained viral response (SVR) rates than HCV monoinfected patients. However, the role of CD4+ T-cell counts on viral kinetics and outcome is not fully understood.

METHODS

HCV RNA kinetics (bDNA v3, lower limit of detection [LD] = 615 IU/mL) was analyzed in 32 HIV/HCV coinfected persons treated with Pegylated-interferon-alpha2b (1.5 microg/kg weekly) and ribavirin (1-1.2 g daily) for 48 weeks and compared with results obtained from 12 HCV monoinfected patients treated with the same regimen.

RESULTS

Baseline CD4+ T-cell counts > or =450 cells/mm3 were significantly (P < 0.002) associated with SVR in coinfected genotype 1 patients. First phase decline was significantly lower among patients with low as compared with high CD4 counts (P < 0.03) and among coinfected compared with monoinfected patients (P < 0.002). Second phase decline slope showed a similar trend for coinfected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Low baseline CD4+ T-cell count is associated with slower HCV viral kinetics and worse response to treatment among HIV coinfected patients, suggesting HCV treatment response depends on immune status. HCV genotype 1 coinfected patients have slower first phase viral kinetics than HCV monoinfected patients. First phase viral decline (>1.0 log) and second phase viral decline slope (>0.3 log/wk) are excellent predictors of SVR for coinfected patients.

HCV kinetics, quasispecies, and clearance in treated HCV-infected and HCV/HIV-1-coinfected patients with hemophilia

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment response rates remain low in HCV/HIV-1-coinfected individuals compared with those with HCV alone. Persons with inherited coagulation disorders have high rates of HCV and HIV-1 infection, but HCV treatment trials in this patient population are scarce. We hypothesized that differences by infection status in HCV viral kinetics would be associated with differences in HCV quasispecies complexity over time and with treatment response disparities. Coinfected and monoinfected patients were enrolled in a treatment trial for pegylated-interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN) + ribavirin. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24. Quantitative HCV RNA was tested at multiple times during and after treatment. Viral kinetic parameters associated with response were estimated with a mathematical model. Quasispecies emergence was determined via heteroduplex complexity assay. Twenty-two patients were HCV RNA-positive at baseline, with no significant demographic or virological differences by infection status. Five of eleven (45%) of monoinfected and 3 of 11 (27%) of coinfected patients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). Peg-IFN efficacy (epsilon) of 90% or greater was associated with probability of end-of-treatment response (ETR) (P = .001) and SVR (P = .06). Patients with SVR had lower baseline quasispecies complexity than those without SVR (P = .07). Those with epsilon of 90% or greater also had lower baseline complexity (P = .07). Coinfection status mediated changes in complexity over time (P = .04). In conclusion, low pretreatment quasispecies complexity may predict peg-IFN response; early peg-IFN response is critical for sustained HCV clearance and is altered in coinfection. Further studies are warranted.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with haemophilia: a review of the literature

Chronic hepatitis C is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in haemophilia patients. In contrast to studies in the general population, the studies of antiviral therapy in haemophilia patients are limited and often include small numbers of patients. A review of the literature was performed to assess the efficacy of interferon (IFN)-based therapy for patients with haemophilia chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Studies were identified by electronic searches (Medline, Embase) and hand searches in references of key articles. Data of the included studies were pooled, and responses to therapy were stratified according to treatment regimen, HIV co-infection status, and treatment history. The main outcome was a sustained virological response (SVR) defined as absence of HCV RNA both at the end of treatment and 24-week post-treatment. Thirty-five studies were identified that included 1151 patients. After pooling the data of included patients, the SVR in HIV-negative treatment naïve patients was 22% for IFN monotherapy, 43% for IFN and ribavirin, and 57% for pegylated IFN and ribavirin, respectively. Re-treatment with IFN and ribavirin of those who failed to respond to previous IFN monotherapy was successful in 33%. In HCV/HIV-coinfected patients, response to IFN monotherapy was 8% and to IFN combined with ribavirin 39%. Responses to IFN-based therapy in patients with haemophilia have been improved over time and are nowadays approximately 50-60%. However, data on haemophilic HCV/HIV-coinfected patients and in patients who failed to respond to previous therapy are limited and future studies in these specific patient population are necessary.

Treatment of hepatitis C in hemophiliacs

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hemophiliacs who received nonvirucidally treated large-pool clotting factor concentrates before 1986. In fact, although many hemophiliacs infected with HCV have a slow progression of liver disease, in a minority of them hepatitis evolves toward end-stage liver disease and hepatocarcinoma. Moreover, a significant percentage of HCV-infected hemophiliacs were also coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which can accelerate the progression of liver disease. Thus, the aim of anti-HCV therapy is to interrupt the chronic infection in order to prevent the progression of hepatitis to cirrhosis, liver decompensation, cancer and, ultimately, death. In this review we present the literature data on anti-HCV treatment in hemophiliacs. Combination therapy with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin has improved the poor results obtained with IFN monotherapy and has become the standard treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Given the positive results obtained with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in nonhemophiliacs, ongoing trials are evaluating this promising therapy in HCV-chronically infected hemophilic patients; preliminary results show a sustained response rate similar to that in patients without coagulopathy. Finally, based on the encouraging results in coinfected nonhemophiliacs, anti-HCV treatment should also be considered for those HIV-positive hemophiliacs in whom anti-retroviral treatment has stabilized the HIV infection.

The rate of treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients co-infected with HIV in an urban medical centre

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection is common. HIV co-infection results in a higher rate of histologic progression and shorter interval to HCV-related cirrhosis. Successful treatment of HCV with interferon-based therapy reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients. Significant factors may limit the availability of treatment in co-infected patients. The rate of treatment of HCV and limiting factors to treatment in a co-infected population in an urban setting were determined. A retrospective review of co-infected patients was conducted at our liver and gastrointestinal (GI) clinics for treatment of HCV from July 2001 to June 2002. Treatment of HCV and reasons for nontreatment were recorded. A total of 104 HCV/HIV co-infected patients were identified. Seventy-two per cent were males. Mean age was 47.2 years (32-72). Seventy-four of the 82 (90%) with identifiable risk factors for HCV infection had a history of intravenous drug use (IVDU). Twenty per cent (21/104) of the total underwent a liver biopsy. Sixty-seven per cent who had a liver biopsy were treated. Overall, sixteen patients were treated. Eighty-eight (85%) patients were not treated for the following reasons: 13 refused treatment, and 75 were ineligible. Of the ineligible patients, 40% were noncompliant with visits, 15% were active substance abusers, 13% had decompensated cirrhosis, 8% had significant active psychiatric conditions and 24% had significant co-morbid disease. A majority of patients co-infected with HCV/HIV had a IVDU history. Most co-infected patients were not eligible for HCV treatment. A majority of noncandidates had potentially modifiable psychosocial factors leading to nontreatment.

Treatment of the hepatitis C virus in patients coinfected with HIV

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common among individuals with HIV, and the progression of liver disease is accelerated in coinfected individuals compared with those with HCV alone. HCV coinfection also can decrease tolerability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, the presence of HCV appears to increase morbidity and mortality in these individuals, and as such the management of both HCV and HIV in coinfected individuals requires careful consideration. Although coinfected patients should be considered for HCV therapy, the limited information to date indicates a lower rate of virologic response with current HCV therapies. Moreover, interactions between HCV and HIV antiviral medications may occur and potentially affect treatment efficacy. Thus, the decision to undertake HCV treatment must be individualized.

Cytokines as clinical adjuvants: how far are we?

In spite of the explosive growth in the discovery of cytokines and chemokines and in the understanding of their modes of action, clinical use of such agents as adjuvants has been primarily restricted to patients with cancer or chronic viral infections suffering from various levels of immune impairment and for whom the chemotherapeutic armamentarium, as well as other forms of immunotherapy, have been exhausted. This cautious approach has been justified by the difficulties inherent to the biological function and delivery of such pleiotropic agents, where doses needed to achieve the targeted immune enhancement often result in serious side effects, especially during systemic administration. In addition, optimization of dosages, administration schedules and biological effects in humans often do not correlate well with preclinical data derived from animal models. Nevertheless, novel preventive immunization strategies that target a precise type of immune response in immunocompetent individuals are expected to greatly benefit from the incorporation of cytokines and chemokines. This review provides an overview of current clinical administration of cytokines as well as a description of select Phase I testing of new agents designed to enhance immune defenses in vivo.

Fast relapse and high drop out rate of 48 weeks daily interferon monotherapy in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for HCV Hepatitis is the combination of interferon (IFN) plus Ribavirin. In HIV patients the use of this combination therapy may induce drug interactions, and reduces the adherence to HAART. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of a 48 weeks daily dose IFN schedule.

METHODS

We evaluated 50 coinfected patients; alpha IFN 2a was administered at a dose of 3 MU daily. The baseline values were the following : CD4+ 515 cells/mmc (mean); HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml in all patients; HCV-RNA 28, 3 x 106 copies/ml.

RESULTS

At 48 weeks, 10 patients (20%) achieved a biochemical and virological response according to an intention to treat analysis.Twenty four patients (48%) underwent a drop-out mainly by side effects related to overlapping toxicity of interferon and antiretroviral therapy. All the patients, who responded to the treatment, showed a fast relapse one month after the end of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although our results demonstrated a very poor outcome and a bad tolerance to interferon monotherapy, this approach should not be dropped out, mainly in patients at high risk for side effects and in those with cirrhosis who do not tolerate or are at increased risk for the use of ribavirin.

Clinical experiences with interferon as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection accelerates progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) toward cirrhosis. Thus, with the increase of life expectancy observed after introduction of combination antiretroviral treatment, liver disease is becoming an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. In addition, HCV co-infection blunts CD4 restoration induced by HAART and increases HAART hepatotoxicity. For all these reasons, anti-HCV treatment is mandatory in HIV seropositives. The perfect treatment of hepatitis C should not only be safe and effective, but it should not have any adverse impact on HIV diseases and concurrent anti-HIV therapy. Two drugs are currently licensed for treatment of HCV: interferon alfa (IFNalpha) and ribavirin. Three hundred and thirty-eight patients have been included in pilot studies on the efficacy and tolerability of IFNalpha monotherapy: 16% showed sustained response and 10% dropped out. No significant adverse impact of IFNalpha monotherapy on HIV diseases or antiretroviral treatment has been observed. IFNalpha and ribavirin in combination have been introduced more recently: only 88 patients were included in pilot studies published as full papers with a 25% sustained response and an 11% rate of drop outs. Anemia and cumulative toxicity with didanosine were the most important side effects of combination treatment, but it did not affect HIV disease progression. Higher rates of sustained response (33%) without increase of side effects have been observed in preliminary experiences with the new long-acting pegylated interferons in combination with ribavirin. The search for the perfect treatment continues.

Management of hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Hepatitis C virus-related liver disease and its associated complications are steadily emerging health concerns in persons co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus. The increasing number of liver-related deaths in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus co-infected individuals supports the compelling argument for more aggressive treatment in these patients. The safety and efficacy of interferon/ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients is currently under evaluation. Despite well-documented concern over highly active antiretroviral therapy-associated hepatotoxicity human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients should be offered antiretroviral therapy. Since management of co-infected patients is complex a multidisciplinary approach is needed in order to facilitate care and help patients to achieve a positive outcome.

HIV coinfection does not compromise liver histological response to interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

Although discrepancies between histological and virological responses to anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy are well-established in HIV-negative patients, the liver histological outcome has never been assessed in HIV-HCV co-infected patients receiving anti-HCV therapy. We compared histological responses to interferon (IFN) alpha therapy between HIV-positive and HIV-negative injecting drug users (IDU) and determined factors associated with histological response.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hepatology unit of a tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS

Seventy-nine HCV-infected IDU (32 HIV-positive) receiving a 6-month course of IFN-alpha2b therapy, 3 x 106 U three times a week.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Histological response, defined by a > or =2 point decrease in total Knodell score measured on paired liver biopsies over a 2-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

The sustained response rate to IFN therapy was lower in HIV-positive patients than in HIV-negative patients (6.2% versus 29.8%;P = 0.012). Conversely, the rates of histological response (40.6% versus 36.2%) were not different between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. Independent factors associated with histological response were first total Knodell score (P = 0.0007) and sustained response to IFN therapy (odds ratio, 12.34; P = 0.005). Histological response was observed in 25% of IFN non-responders whatever their HIV status. In HIV-positive patients, the CD4 cell count did not influence the histological response.

CONCLUSIONS

in HIV-HCV co-infected patients treated with IFN, liver histological improvement is frequently observed, similarly to that observed in HIV-negative patients. Such beneficial effect of interferon therapy supports early treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients.

Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus coinfections

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It is estimated that 30% to 50% of patients with HIV are coinfected with HCV. Advances in antiretroviral therapy and improved life expectancy of HIV patients have resulted in an emergence of HCV-induced liver disease as a leading cause of significant morbidity and death in this population. Clinically, hepatitis C is a more severe disease in HIV-infected individuals, characterized by rapid progression toward end-stage liver disease. Highly active antiretroviral therapy is the mainstay of current acquired immunodeficiency syndrome management. One of the limiting side effects of combination therapy for HIV is hepatotoxicity, which is more common and often more serious in patients with underlying liver disease. Management of coinfected patients has no strict guidelines, but it is generally accepted that HIV infection needs to be treated before HCV. Hepatitis C in coinfected individuals is probably best treated using combination therapy (interferon alpha and ribavirin). It appears that combination therapy can safely be administered to this population and that previous concerns about ribavirin/zidovudine antagonism are unsubstantiated in clinical practice. Although initial results using only interferon alpha showed poor results in HIV coinfected patients, combination therapy seems to be as effective as in the general population. All HIV-HCV coinfected patients should be vaccinated against hepatitis B and hepatitis A; vaccines are safe and effective.