In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of polyethylene-fibre-reinforced-composite versus glass-fibre-reinforced-composite fixed partial dentures

Effects of different surface treatments on surface topography and bond strength in the repair of fiber-reinforced dentin composite

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength between a fiber-reinforced dentin composite and a posterior composite.

METHODS

Forty fiber-reinforced dentin composite resin blocks (4 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm) were separated into eight groups (n = 5) according to the surface preparation methods: (G1) negative control group, (G2) adhesive application, (G3) 50% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) application, (G4) 50% DMSO + adhesive application, (G5) 37% phosphoric acid etch + adhesive application, (G6) air abrasion + adhesive application, (G7) 37% phosphoric acid etch + 50% DMSO application + adhesive application, and (G8) air abrasion +50% DMSO application + adhesive application group. The composite surfaces were repaired in two layers with a posterior composite. Composite sticks were subjected to a micro tensile bond strength (μTBS) test. Fractured surfaces were evaluated using a stereomicroscope (×25). Short fiber-reinforced composite samples' surfaces were investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Shapiro Wilk, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

The highest average (μTBS) values were observed in G8, whereas the lowest mean μTBS values were evident in the G1 group. Statistically significant μTBS values were found in all adhesive-applied groups when compared with the negative control group. Notably, the application of 50% DMSO without adhesive did not lead to a statistically significant increase in μTBS values. SEM images demonstrated that acid etching partially eliminated residues on the composite surface, while air abrasion had a detrimental effect on the integrity of fiber structures.

CONCLUSION

In the repair of fiber-reinforced dentin composite with a posterior composite, adhesive application is an effective approach. The treatment of 50% DMSO without adhesive did not confer a statistically significant advantage, and the supplemental use of acid etch or air abrasion did not show an additional benefit compared to adhesive-only repairs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Adhesive application emerges as a potent and effective strategy for the repair of bur-roughened fiber-reinforced dentin composites. With its limitations, the study highlights the efficacy of adhesive-only repairs without the necessity for additional surface treatments.

Effect of Long Glass Fiber Orientations or a Short-Fiber-Reinforced Composite on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of direct restorations using unidirectional glass fiber orientations and a short-fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC) on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with mesio-occluso-distal cavities. Ninety double-rooted premolars were selected. Fifteen teeth were left intact/as a control group. The endodontic treatment and cavity preparations of seventy-five teeth were performed and divided into five experimental groups: Resin composite (RC), modified transfixed technique + RC, circumferential technique + RC, cavity floor technique + RC, and SFRC + RC. All teeth were fractured under oblique static loading at a 30° angle using a universal testing machine. The fracture patterns were observed and classified. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, Pearson chi-square, and Tukey HSD post hoc tests (p = 0.05). The highest fracture strength values were obtained in intact teeth (599.336 N), followed by modified transfixed + RC treated teeth (496.58 N), SFRC + RC treated teeth (469.62 N), RC (443.51 N), circumferential + RC treated teeth (442.835 N), and cavity floor + RC treated teeth (404.623 N) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the RC and the circumferential technique + RC (p > 0.05). Unrepairable fractures were observed at low rates (20%) in the modified transfixed + RC and SFRC + RC teeth, and at higher rates in RC (73.3%), cavity floor + RC (60%), and circumferential + RC (80%) teeth. The application of an SFRC or the modified transfixed technique yielded an improved fracture strength and the fracture pattern of ETPs being restored with a universal injectable composite.

Comparison of fiber reinforcing methods of composite resin: A flexural strength and stereo microscopy study

This study aimed to compare the effect of fiber reinforcing methods on the flexural strength and failure modes of indirect composite resins. Based on the reinforcement methods, the bar specimens (3 × 3 × 25 mm) were divided into five groups (n = 20). Glass or polyethylene fibers were used for reinforcement of indirect composite resins. Fibers were either light polymerized and mixed with indirect composite resin or mixed with indirect composite resin after resin application and polymerized together. Indirect composite resin without fiber reinforcement was used as control. All five types of specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Half of the specimens were additionally thermocycled. Then the specimens were tested in a three-point bending test. Failure types were examined and categorized by using stereo microscope. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test. Flexural strength was found to be significantly higher for fiber-reinforced indirect resin composites than control. However, the fiber-reinforced groups did not present any significant difference. Analysis revealed aging does not affect the flexure strength of fiber reinforcement of indirect composite resin. The study concluded that the flexure strength of indirect composite resins was improved with fiber reinforcement. Different fiber reinforcement methods demonstrated similar effects on the flexure strength of indirect composite resin. Reinforcement with glass or polyethylene fibers presented the potential to improve the mechanical properties of indirect composite resins. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Flexural strength of indirect composite resins are affected by the reinforcement of composites with glass or polyethylene fibers. Aging with thermocycling has no effect on the flexural strength of the indirect composite resins, however can cause catastrophic failures in material.

Effect of Fiber Reinforcement Type on the Performance of Large Posterior Restorations: A Review of In Vitro Studies

To reinforce extensively prepared cavities, different types of fiber reinforcement are utilized. Polyethylene and glass fibers are the most commonly used fibers in that purpose; each type has its own advantages over the other type. Therefore, the aim of this study is to review the literature to evaluate and compare the influence of different fiber reinforcement types on the performance of posterior large composite restorations. Two independent authors performed a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, and a manual search for cross references until July 2021. Authors selected only studies that contain comparisons between glass (continuous or short) and polyethylene (woven) fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) in posterior cavities of human teeth, and that report the effect of fiber inclusion on fracture resistance, microleakage, and marginal adaptation of restorations. A number of 2711 potentially relevant articles were obtained from the electronic search. After extensive assessment, 2696 articles were ineligible to be included in the review, and only 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. Four out of nine studies, which tested the fracture resistance of FRC restorations, revealed similar performance of the glass and polyethylene fibers. The rest of the studies (n = 5) revealed statistically significant differences between the two types of fiber reinforcement, with the majority showed superior reinforcement of glass fiber. Moreover, the reviewed studies revealed that, using fibers within the composite restorations would reduce the microleakage and improve the marginal adaptation of the restoration regardless of the fiber type. FRCs tend to strengthen the restorations of structurally compromised teeth and improve their performance compared to plain composite restorations.

Effect of fiber-reinforcement on the strength of polymer materials for provisional restorations: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different methods of fiber reinforcement (glass fibers preimpregnated, glass fibers nonpreimpregnated, and polyethylene fibers) on the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of poly-methyl-methacrylate resin (PMMA) and Bis-Gma materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 specimens of autopolymerizing PMMA resin specimens were fabricated using a stainless steel matrix with dimensions of (37.5± 2) × (3 ± 0.1) × (3 ± 0.1) mm according to the standards of ISO 10477. The autopolymerizing resins used in this study were: (a) JET, (b) TRIM, (c) PROTEMP. The fibers used in this study were STICK (Glass fiber preimpregnated), POLYDENTIA (Glass fiber nonpreimpregnated), RIBBOND (Polyethylene fiber). The specimens were tested by three-point bending test and the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity were recorded. The data of each resin type were analyzed by analysis of variance using a significance level of 0.05 to determine the mean differences.

RESULTS

The integration of reinforcing fibers in the mass of resins for provisional restorations increased both the flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity in all tested combinations compared to control groups. After the three-point bending test, the specimens were not completely fractured and the parts remained together due to the fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

Fiber reinforcement is an effective method to increase mechanical properties of provisional restorative resins. Reinforcement with fibers enhances the flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity of the specimens compared to unreinforced (control) group.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The reinforcement of resin materials used for provisional restorations with fibers can increase mechanical strength and may improve the clinical performance and the longevity of provisional restorations during their clinical function.

Effects of pontic span and fiber reinforcement on fracture strength of multi-unit provisional fixed partial dentures

Background/purpose

Clinically, PMMA resin is extensively used for fabricating provisional FPDs. However, fracture often occurs due to the unsatisfactory mechanical strength, especially within connectors of long-span provisional FPDs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the fracture load of fiber-reinforced provisional FPDs with various pontic span lengths, and to identify the most suitable span length for fiber-reinforced long-span provisional FPDs.

Materials and methods

Fifty-six provisional FPDs with various pontic span lengths were fabricated. Seven samples from each group were reinforced with glass fibers. Unreinforced counterparts served as control. The samples were fixed on the abutments after thermocycling and then received a fatigue test. Subsequently, they were mechanically loaded until fracture, and the initial fracture load and fracture patterns were recorded. Statistical analysis, including two-sample t-test, one-way, two-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc analysis and χ2 test were used to evaluate mechanical performance.

Results

The mean fracture load of FPDs with 14 mm pontic span length is significantly higher than the other lengths. The fracture load of each reinforced group is significantly higher than each counterpart control. There is no interaction between two variables, pontic span and fiber reinforcement. With fiber reinforcement, the fracture patterns were altered from catastrophic fracture to bent or partial fracture. But, the fracture patterns were not affected by pontic span.

Conclusion

The fracture load of acrylic FPDs decreases significantly when pontic span length is greater than 17 mm. Adding glass fibers into long-span provisional FPDs can significantly improve the fracture resistance and fracture patterns.

Effect of Endocrowns on Fracture Strength and Microleakage of Endodontically Treated Primary Molar Teeth

Objectives:

Optimal restoration of endodontically treated teeth is very important for the durability of the endodontic treatment. The focus of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength and microleakage of composite endocrowns compared with Class II composite restorations in endodontically treated primary molar teeth.

Materials and Methods:

48 extracted second primary molars were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (control): teeth with Class II and endodontic access cavities restored with G-aenial composite; group 2: endocrown restorations with G-aenial composite. After completing restorative procedures, teeth were subjected to thermal cycling (500 cycles). Compressive loading was applied to half of the samples, although the other half were immersed in 0.5% basic fucsin solution for 24 h, sectioned, and examined for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Data were subjected to statistical analysis by the Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05).

Results:

The fracture strength of endocrowns (1741 ± 379.35 N) was significantly higher than that of the control group (1126.5 ± 405.39 N) ( P < .05). No statistical difference was found in microleakage between the 2 groups ( P > .05).

Conclusion:

Endocrown preparation increases the fracture strength of the final composite restoration when used in primary molar teeth. Composite endocrown restorations can be a practical and an esthetic option for restoring endodontically treated primary molar teeth.

Influence of additional reinforcement of fixed long-term temporary restorations on fracture load

PURPOSE

In implant dentistry, temporary restorations (TR) might often be required for up to one year. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the long-time performance of four-unit TRs in the posterior region based on different materials and reinforcement methods.

METHODS

One hundred and forty four TRs were manufactured on 16 models simulating an oral situation of two missing posterior teeth. With a computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) workflow, a TR was fabricated (CAD; Telio CAD), which served as a template for other subgroups. With a vacuum-formed template, unreinforced and reinforced TRs [glass fibres (g; EverStick); polyethylenefibres (p; Ribbond original) and TRs with increased connector area (c; 27.5-35mm²)] were manufactured. Two different composite materials were used (C1: Luxatemp, C2: Protemp). Altogether, 16 subgroups with 8 specimens each were tested. After temporary luting (Temp Bond NE) and artificial-aging [1600 thermo-cycles (5-55°C), 240,000 chewing-cycles (50N)], all specimens were tested until fracture in a universal testing machine.

RESULTS

After artificial aging, mean fracture loads (N) were: (C1)201.2±109.7, (C1c)1033.0±173.1, (C1p)90.0±40.0, (C1g)75.9±25.9, (C2)108.6±58.6, (C2c)1363.3±148.6, (C2p)104.7±54.7, (C2g)50.0±0.0 and (CAD)232.5±19.1. The one-factor ANOVA analysis showed significant differences for the factors temporary material (p<0.047), reinforcement (p<0.0001) and artificial-aging (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicated that both CAD/CAM TRs and TRs with increased connector areas are suitable for long-term use of one year. No enhancement of fracture load was observed for fibre-reinforced TRs except for the fact that fractured TRs were not totally separated.

Comparative evaluation between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites: A review of the current literature

BACKGROUND

Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a promising class of material that gives clinicians alternative treatment options. There are many FRC products available in the market based on either glass or polyethylene fiber type. The aim of this study was to present a comparison between glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites based on available literature review.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A thorough literature search, with no limitation, was done up to June 2017. The range of relevant publications was surveyed using PubMed and Google Scholar. From the search results, articles related to our search terms were only considered. An assessment of these articles was done by two individuals in order to include only articles directly compare between glass and polyethylene FRCs. The search terms used were "fiber reinforced dental composites" and "glass and polyethylene fibers in dentistry".

RESULTS

The search provided 276 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Most were laboratory-based research with various test specimen designs prepared according to ISO standard or with extracted teeth and only three articles were clinical studies. Most of studies (n=23) found superior characteristics of glass FRCs over polyethylene FRCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant reinforcement differences between commercial glass and polyethylene fiber reinforced composites were found. Key words:Fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber.

Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite resin along with fibre insertion in different positions in vitro

This study was carried out to compare the different techniques of placement of polyethylene fibre (Ribbond) on reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with MOD cavities in vitro. Forty extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10). Teeth in Groups I-IV received root canal treatment and a MOD cavity preparation, with gingival cavosurface margin 1.5 mm in coronal to cementoenamel junction. Group I served as no fibre group, Group II as occlusal fibre group, Group III as base fibre group and Group IV as dual-fibre group (occlusal and base both). Subsequent to restoring with composite resin and thermocycling, a vertical compressive force was applied at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm min(-1) using universal testing machine until fracture. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc tests. Fracture resistance was significantly highest in dual-fibre group (P < 0.001) as compared with other groups. The highest favourable fracture rate was observed in the base fibre group (70%). This study concluded that the use of polyethylene fibre inserted over or under the restoration significantly increased the fracture strength of the root canal-treated teeth and maximum fracture resistance was observed when cavity was restored using dual-fibre technique.

Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively analyze the surface roughness of the slot floors of three types of modern plastic brackets and to measure static frictional force during sliding mechanics in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Control groups comprised stainless steel brackets and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Test groups comprised three types of 0.022-in slot, Roth prescription, plastic, maxillary right central incisor brackets. Test groups included glass fiber-reinforced polycarbonate, filler-reinforced polycarbonate, and hybrid polymer with inserted metal slot brackets. The static frictional resistance caused by sliding movements with an archwire (stainless steel) in vitro was quantitatively analyzed. Both scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional optical surface profiling were used.

RESULTS

Scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional optical surface profiler revealed that all as-received brackets had irregular slot floor surfaces, and both irregularity and roughness increased after the archwire sliding test. The ceramic brackets in the control group showed significantly lower surface roughness values and higher frictional values during the archwire sliding test compared with the other brackets. The glass or filler-reinforced plastic brackets exhibited significantly higher static frictional values than the metallic slot type brackets (P < .001). The hybrid polymer with inserted metal slot brackets showed relatively lower surface roughness and frictional values compared with the stainless steel control bracket.

CONCLUSION

Glass or filler-reinforced plastic brackets showed higher frictional resistance than metallic slot-type brackets. A plastic bracket with inserted metal slot may be the best choice among plastic brackets for low frictional resistance and to avoid damage from sliding movements of the archwire.

The reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre and composite impregnated glass fibre on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study

Aim:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with wide mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored with either composite resin, or composite resin reinforced with different types of fibres.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty human maxillary premolars were selected. Five intact teeth served as positive controls. Endodontic therapy was carried out in the remaining forty-five teeth. Standardized MOD cavities were prepared in all the teeth. The teeth were restored with a nanocomposite using an incremental technique. These forty five teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups (Group A, B and C) (n = 15). The teeth in Group A did not undergo any further procedures. The teeth in Group B and C were reinforced with composite impregnated glass fibre and polyethylene fibre, respectively. Fracture resistance was measured in Newtons (N).

Results:

The positive controls showed the highest mean fracture resistance (811.90 N), followed by Group B (600.49N), Group A (516.96N) and Group C (514.64N), respectively. One Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed a statistically significant difference between all the groups (P = 0.001). Post-hoc Tukey test revealed a moderately significant difference (P = 0.034) between Control and Group B, and a strongly significant difference between Control and Group A (P = 0.002), and Control and Group C (P = 0.001).

Conclusions:

Endodontic therapy and MOD cavity preparation significantly reduced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars (P = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the experimental groups (Group A, B and C) (P > 0.1). However, the fracture resistance of the composite impregnated glass fibre reinforced group was much higher than the others.

The effect of different fiber reinforcements on flexural strength of provisional restorative resins: an in-vitro study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and bis-acryl composite resin reinforced with polyethylene and glass fibers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three groups of rectangular test specimens (n = 15) of each of the two resin/fiber reinforcement were prepared for flexural strength test and unreinforced group served as the control. Specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine until fracture. The mean flexural strengths (MPa) was compared by one way ANOVA test, followed by Scheffe analysis, using a significance level of 0.05. Flexural strength between fiber-reinforced resin groups were compared by independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

For control groups, the flexural strength for PMMA (215.53 MPa) was significantly lower than for bis-acryl composite resin (240.09 MPa). Glass fiber reinforcement produced significantly higher flexural strength for both PMMA (267.01 MPa) and bis-acryl composite resin (305.65 MPa), but the polyethylene fibers showed no significant difference (PMMA resin-218.55 MPa and bis-acryl composite resin-241.66 MPa). Among the reinforced groups, silane impregnated glass fibers showed highest flexural strength for bis-acryl composite resin (305.65 MPa).

CONCLUSION

Of two fiber reinforcement methods evaluated, glass fiber reinforcement for the PMMA resin and bis-acryl composite resin materials produced highest flexural strength.

Clinical implications

On the basis of this in-vitro study, the use of glass and polyethylene fibers may be an effective way to reinforce provisional restorative resins. When esthetics and space are of concern, glass fiber seems to be the most appropriate method for reinforcing provisional restorative resins.

Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study

AIM

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the use of composite fibers (glass fiber and polyethylene fiber) at the gingival third of mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) cavities on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 extracted premolars underwent endodontic treatment. MOD cavities, 2.5 ± 0.2 mm thick at the buccal and lingual heights of contour, were prepared, with the gingival cavosurface margin 1.5 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction. Then the teeth were randomly divided into three groups. In group 1, the cavities were restored with Z250 composite resin without the use of any fibers. In groups 2 and 3, the teeth were restored in the same manner as that in group 1 after placement of glass fiber and polyethylene fiber at the gingival third of the cavities, respectively. Subsequent to thermocycling, fracture resistance of the specimens was measured in Newton (N).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test at a significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the means of fracture resistance values between the three groups (p = 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed in the fracture resistance between group 2 and groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). However, the differences between groups 1 and 3 were not significant (p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

The type of fiber influenced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated human premolars.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Using glass and/or polyethylene fibers in the gingival third of composite restorations leads to different results in fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three methods of fiber insertion on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars in vitro. Sixty extracted human maxillary premolars received endodontic treatment followed by mesioocclusodistal (MOD) cavities with 2.5 +/- 0.2 mm thicknesses of buccal and lingual cusps at height of contour. The gingival cavosurface margin was 1.5 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Subsequently, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups. In the no-fiber group, the cavities were restored with composite, and in other groups, composite impregnated glass fibers were placed in the gingival, middle, and occlusal third surfaces of the cavities, respectively, and were restored similar to the no-fiber group. Subsequent to thermocycling and exertion of compressive forces, statistical analysis showed that the fracture resistance in the occlusal fiber group was significantly higher than that in other groups (p < 0.0005). In addition, the highest favorable fracture and the lowest cusp detachment rates were observed in the occlusal fiber group.

Effect of Fiber Nets, Application Techniques and Flowable Composites on Microleakage and the Effect of Fiber Nets on Polymerization Shrinkage in Class II MOD Cavities

Fiber nets applied to Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction in microleakage. Fiber nets also decreased polymerization shrinkage. Therefore, these materials may be acceptable for clinical applications. Incremental placement remains the preferred restorative technique for posterior composite restorations.

Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study was aimed to compare the fracture resistance of directly fabricated inlay-retained fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) fixed partial dentures (FPDs) with four types of framework designs.

METHODS

Forty-eight directly fabricated inlay retained FPDs were made of FRC and particulate resin composite (everStick/Tetric flow and Ceram). Extracted human mandibular first premolars and first molars were as abutments. The following framework designs were tested: in the Group A (control group), the framework was made of two prepregs of unidirectional glass FRC; the Group B, two prepregs in pontic portion were covered with one layer of multidirectional fiber veil FRC; the Group C, the FRC prepregs were covered in pontic portion with four short unidirectional FRC pieces along the main prepregs; in Group D, one short unidirectional FRC prepregs were placed on the main prepregs in 90 degrees angle to the main framework. After thermal cycling, FPDs of each group (n=12) were randomly divided into two subgroups (n=6). Fracture test was performed at the universal testing machine (1mm/min) where FPDs were loaded from the occlusal direction to the occlusal fossa or to the buccal cusp. Failure patterns were observed with stereomicroscope. Median and 25%/75% percentile values were calculated and nonparametric analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Compared with three other framework designs, the FPDs in Group D showed the highest resistance when loading to the occlusal fossa, with maximum load of 2,353.8N (25%/75%: 2,155.5/2,500.0) (p=0.000, 0.000, and 0.005 for compared with Group A, B, and C). The same group showed also higher resistance when loaded to the buccal cusp (1,416.3N (1,409.2/1,480.8)) if compared to the FPDs of the Group A and Group C (p=0.044, 0.010). In general the FPDs showed higher resistant to loading at the occlusal fossa (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This in vitro study showed that inlay-retained FRC FPD constructed with direct technique provided high fracture resistance. The framework design that provided support for the veneering composite of the pontic contributed to the highest load-bearing capacity even when loaded to the buccal cusp.

Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts

PURPOSE

This investigation evaluated the effect of glass and polyethylene fiber inserts on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations with gingival margins on root surfaces.

METHODS

Fifty-four intact molars were sterilized with Gamma irradiation and mounted in acrylic bases. Class II slot cavities were made on both proximal sides of each tooth (3 mm wide, 1.5 mm deep) with the gingival margin on the root surface. The teeth were divided into nine groups, according to the technique of restoration and type of bonding agent. Filtek P-60 (3M/ESPE) was used to restore all cavities. Two types of fiber inserts were used: glass fiber (Ever Stick, StickTech) and polyethylene (Ribbond-THM), with three bonding agents being employed: Scotch Bond Multipurpose (3M/ESPE), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and Xeno IV (Dentsply). In the experimental groups, 3 mm long fiber inserts were inserted into restorations at the gingival seat. The control groups had no fiber inserts. The restorations were made incrementally and cured with LED light (UltraLume5, Ultradent). The restored teeth were stored in water for two weeks, then thermocycled for 3000 cycles (5 degrees C and 55 degrees C). The tooth surfaces were sealed with nail polish, except at the restoration margins. The teeth were immersed in 2% procion red dye solution, sectioned and dye penetration was assessed to determine the extent of microleakage according to a six-point scale.

RESULTS

The fiber groups generally showed reduced microleakage scores compared to the control groups. The Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray)/Filtek P-60 (3M/ESPE) combination produced the lowest degree of microleakage, irrespective of fiber type. However, the glass fiber groups were more consistent in reducing microleakage than the polyethylene groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of fiber inserts significantly reduced gingival microleakage in Class II composite restorations with gingival margins in dentin, irrespective of the adhesive used. Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray)/Filtek P60 (3M/ESPE) produced the lowest microleakage scores.

Influence of fibre and filler reinforcement of plastic brackets: an in vitro study

In spite of their popularity in fulfilling aesthetic requirements, plastic brackets still present some disadvantages because of their low elastic modulus, decreased fracture toughness, and reduced wear resistance. Fibre-reinforced composites are well established in dentistry and consist of a polymer matrix in which reinforcing fibres are embedded. Stress is transferred from the polymer matrix to the fibres which present a high tensile strength. Hence, the mechanical properties of polymers could be improved. The purpose of this study was to compare fracture strength, fracture toughness and flexural strength of an experimental fibre-reinforced bracket material, an SiO(2) filler-reinforced bracket and an unfilled plastic bracket material (control group). Experimental brackets and specialized bars were manufactured. Tests were performed after thermal cycling (5 degrees C/55 degrees C) the samples in an artificial oral environment of a device to simulate mastication. Statistical evaluation was undertaken. The median, 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated and a Mann-Whitney U-test was performed. In this study two findings were obvious. (1) Filler reinforcement of plastic brackets improved fracture strength and fracture toughness in comparison with the unfilled bracket material. (2) Glass fibre reinforcement of orthodontic bracket materials resulted in the greatest enhancement of the mechanical properties in comparison with the other test groups. Therefore, the application of glass fibres in plastic brackets is a successful method to enhance fracture strength.

Stress distribution in fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures (FRCIFPDs) may be a reliable prosthetic solution. Clinical procedures involved in their fabrication have been defined, but little is known about their mechanical behavior.

PURPOSE

This in vitro study used the finite element (FE) method to investigate 3-dimensional (3-D) stress and strain distribution produced in a 3-unit FRCIFPD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 3-D FE model (227,768 3-D tetrahedral elements) of a 3-unit FRCIFPD cemented onto box-shaped prepared teeth was developed. Stress and strain distribution generated by a maximum load of 196 N applied vertically or laterally to the FRCIFPD centrally, on an area of 4 +/- 0.1 mm 2 , was analyzed. The specimen used to acquire the geometry of the model was also used for mechanical compressive tests, with vertical and lateral loads, to validate the numerical model.

RESULTS

The peak values of stress, calculated on the outer and inner surfaces of the FRCIFPD, were localized in the connector areas. When a vertical load was applied, stress on the prepared teeth was concentrated at the cervical margin of the abutment preparation.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results suggest that within the FRCIFPD, stress concentrates at the connector areas, and that in the prepared teeth, peak stress is at the cervical margin of the box of the preparation.

The effect of fiber reinforcement on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Fracture of provisional restorations is of concern, especially with long-span fixed partial dentures or areas of heavy occlusal stress. A number of different techniques for reinforcement of provisional restorations have been suggested; however, the effect of these techniques is largely unclear.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the fracture toughness and flexural strength of different types of provisional restoration resins reinforced with different commercially available fibers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 105 specimens were prepared in this study for each test; compact tensile specimens for the fracture toughness test and rectangular specimens for the flexural strength test. The specimens were divided into 3 groups according to the type of resin used, Jet, Trim, or Temphase (n=35), and then each group was divided into 7 subgroups (n=5) according to the type of fiber reinforcement, Construct, Fibrestick, Ribbond normal, Ribbond THM, Ribbond triaxial, or Fibrenet. Unreinforced specimens served as the control. Specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine until fracture. The mean fracture toughness (MPa.m(1/2)) and mean flexural strength (MPa) were compared by 1-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey standardized range test (alpha=.05).

RESULTS

Fibrestick and Construct reinforcements showed a significant increase (P<.0001) in mean fracture toughness over unreinforced controls for all resins tested. Fibrestick increased the polymethyl methacrylate from 1.25+/-0.06 MPa.m(1/2) to 2.74+/-0.12 MPa.m(1/2); polyethyl methacrylate from 0.67+/-0.07 MPa.m(1/2) to 1.64+/-0.13 MPa.m(1/2); and bis-acryl from 0.87+/-0.05 MPa.m(1/2) to 1.39+/-0.11 MPa.m(1/2). Construct increased polymethyl methacrylate to 2.59+/-0.28 MPa.m(1/2); polyethyl methacrylate to 1.53+/-0.22 MPa.m(1/2); and bis-acryl to 1.30+/-0.13 MPa.m(1/2); however, there was no significant difference between Fibrestick and Construct reinforcements in the degree of reinforcement. Similarly the mean flexural strength values were significantly increased by different combinations of fiber and resin (P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of fibers to provisional resin increased both fracture toughness and flexural strength.

Fixed partial dentures: all-ceramics, fibre-reinforced composites and experimental systems

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture strength of three-unit FPDs (fixed partial dentures) and three-unit inlay FPDs after a simulated 5-year oral wearing period. The restorations were made of a pressable all-ceramic (Empress 2) and two specially designed, experimentally fixed partial dentures combining ceramics with dental composite. Three-unit FPDs and inlay FPDs were manufactured and were adhesively luted onto human molars. After thermal cycling and mechanical loading in an artificial environment, the fracture strength was determined. Zircon-based milled ceramic (Lava) three-unit FPDs were used as a control. The zircon ceramic and the fibre-based ceramic three-unit FPDs showed median fracture values between 1000 and 1400 N. For composite veneered zircon FPDs a fracture strength of about 800 N and for all-ceramic Empress 2 of about 350 N could be determined. The results for the inlay FPDs were between 1300 N and 1400 N for FRC/ceramic, 1000 N for zircon/composite and 500 N for all-ceramic restorations. The all-ceramic showed higher fracture resistance applied as inlay FPDs. The described hybrid techniques combining ceramics and composites could represent an interesting procedure for further investigations and, eventually, clinical implication.