Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial of combination of ribavirin and high dose interferon-alpha in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

Determinants of immunological and virological responses to antiretroviral therapy amongst HIV-infected adults in central Argentina: negative influence of hepatitis C infection

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to update the epidemiological data on the prevalence of coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV, and to identify whether specific clinical and epidemiological factors influenced the response of HIV-positive adults to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study of 238 HIV-infected patients evaluated the effect of different epidemiological and clinical parameters (including HCV coinfection) on therapy response among HIV-infected adults initiating HAART. Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with therapy response and estimated risk coefficients.

RESULTS

Seroprevalence of HCV infection in this population was 26% (62/238). We did not observe a significant association between immunological or virological response relating to patient gender or HAART regimen. However, this analysis showed that HCV serological status, age at HIV diagnosis, duration of treatment and WHO clinical stage of AIDS (<200 CD4 cells/ml independently of viral load either < or > to 100,000 copies/ml), were significantly associated with immunological and virological responses to HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show further evidence that hepatitis C serostatus is associated with a reduced response to HAART.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy is ribavirin plus pegylated interferon to achieve undetectable level of virus in the blood, but the effect on clinical outcomes is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained loss of hepatitis C virus, liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses of patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. All outcomes were analysed with the random-effects model. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR). We used trial sequential analyses to examine the robustness of our findings.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 randomised trials with 12,707 patients. Most trials had unclear or high risk of bias. We did not find any significant influence of bias on our results but cannot exclude outcome measure reporting bias as many trials did not report on the primary outcomes of this review. Compared with interferon, ribavirin plus interferon had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.75), relapsers (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70), non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93), and in all patients (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality in all patients (Peto OR, 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of haematological, dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnoea, fatigue) adverse reactions. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation and dose reductions. Trial sequential analyses confirmed our findings regarding virological effects, but not regarding liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus from the blood. Combination therapy may reduce liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality, but we need more evidence. The number needed to treat to obtain a beneficial effect is considerable considering the increased risk of several severe adverse reactions and costs.

WITHDRAWN: Ribavirin with or without alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Ribavirin plus interferon combination therapy is presently considered the optimal treatment of interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C, but its role in relapsers and non-responders to previous interferon therapy is not established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin alone or in combination with alpha interferon in interferon naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through searches on electronic databases: The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (August 2001), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001, MEDLINE (1966 - August 2001), and EMBASE (1985 - August 2001). Manual searches of bibliographies and journals were done as well as authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies producing ribavirin or interferon were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials comparing ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo, or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the 'sustained' (six months after treatment) virological response, and morbidity plus mortality. The secondary outcome measures were the 'end of treatment' and 'sustained' biochemical response, the 'end of treatment' virologic response, histology, quality of life, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials in which 271 patients were randomised to ribavirin versus placebo or no intervention and 48 trials in which 6585 patients were randomised to interferon with or without ribavirin. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin monotherapy had no significant effect on the virological response or histology and only a transient effect on the biochemical response. Compared with interferon, combination therapy reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological response by 26% in naive patients (relative risk (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.78), 33% in relapsers (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.57-0.78), and 11% in non-responders (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.96). There was no significant effect on morbidity plus mortality (Peto odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.19-1.06). Irrespective of previous therapy, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having a sustained biochemical response (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) or improved histology (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56-0.81). Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.52) and several types of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy increased the number of naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with a sustained virological, biochemical, or histological response, but also the occurrence of adverse events.

Impact of hepatitis D virus infection on the long-term outcomes of patients with hepatitis B virus and HIV coinfection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Triple infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis D virus (HDV) is rare. The influence of HDV infection on the responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy and hepatic complications in patients with HBV-HIV coinfection remains uncertain.

METHODS

Twenty-six HDV-infected case patients and 78 HDV-uninfected matched control subjects were identified between 1 January 1995 and 30 June 2003. Clinical and immunologic outcomes were noted, and HBV and HIV loads and genotypic resistance of HBV to lamivudine were determined.

RESULTS

Case patients had a higher rate of injection drug use (7.7% vs. 1.3%; P=.05) and lower serum levels of HBV DNA (median level, 4.04 vs. 5.75 log10 copies/mL; P=.07) than control subjects. During a median observation period of 54.7 months, HDV infection did not have an adverse impact on clinical, virological, or immunologic responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy. However, case patients had higher rates of hepatitis flares (57.7% vs. 23.1%; P=.002), hyperbilirubinemia (34.6% vs. 14.1%; P=.04), liver cirrhosis (26.9% vs. 5.1%; P=.009), hepatic decompensation (23.1% vs. 5.1%; P=.007), and death (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-23.85; P=.02), although these patients had a lower risk of genotypic resistance to lamivudine (0% vs. 57.1%; P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

HDV infection did not affect clinical, virological, or immunologic responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with HBV-HIV coinfection. HDV infection increased risk of hepatitis flares, liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and death in patients with HBV-HIV coinfection.

High-dose interferon-α2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with non-response or relapse after interferon-α monotherapy

AIM: To evaluate the daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-α2b (IFN-α2b) in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of patients who failed with interferon monotherapy and had a relapse, based on the assumption that the viral burden would decline faster, thus increasing the likelihood of higher response rates in this difficult-to-treat patient group.

METHODS: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study. Treatment was started with 10 MU IFN-α2b daily for 3 wk, followed by IFN-α2b 5 MU/TIW in combination with ribavirin (1 000-1 200 mg/d) for 21 wk. In case of a negative HCV RNA PCR, treatment was continued until wk 48 (IFN-α2b 3 MU/TIW+1 000-1 200 mg ribavirin/daily).

RESULTS: The dose of IFN-α2b or ribavirin was reduced in 16% of patients because of hematologic side effects, and treatment was discontinued in 7% of patients. An early viral response (EVR) was achieved in 60% of patients. Fifty percent of all patients achieved an end-of-treatment response (EOT) and 40% obtained a sustained viral response (SVR). Patients with no response had a significantly lower response rate than those with a former relapse (SVR 30% vs 53%; P = 0.049). Furthermore, lower response rates were observed in patients infected with genotype 1a/b than in patients with non-1-genotype (SVR 28% vs 74%; P = 0.001). As a significant predictive factor for a sustained response, a rapid initial decline of HCV RNA could be identified. No patient achieving a negative HCV-RNA PCR at wk 18 or later eventually eliminated the virus.

CONCLUSION: Daily high-dose induction therapy with interferon-α2b is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of non-responders and relapsers, when interferon monotherapy fails. A fast decline of viral load during the first 12 wk is strongly associated with a sustained viral response.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades and most patients are diagnosed based on the presence of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid and elevated transaminases.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies, until May 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon alone for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the sustained loss of hepatitis C virus and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. We separately analysed patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 72 randomised trials with 9991 patients. Most trials had low methodological quality but we did not find any significant influence of quality on our results. Compared with interferon, combination therapy had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.75) and in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.76), relapsers (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.73), and non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94) individually. Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy also had a significant beneficial effect on the histological response. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of anaemia (RR 10.48, 95% CI 5.34 to 20.55), which occurred in 22% of patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnea, fatigue) adverse events. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus and improving liver histology. This may lead to reduced morbidity and mortality. However, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of several adverse events.

Early prediction of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection relapse in nonresponders to primary interferon therapy by means of HCV RNA whole-blood analysis

BACKGROUND

Routine analysis of serum and/or plasma specimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA does not always correctly reflect the response to antiviral therapy. Analysis of whole-blood specimens for detection of viral RNA should provide more-accurate prognostic information.

METHODS

Whole-blood, serum, and plasma specimens (268 sample sets) were obtained from 56 patients who did not respond to initial interferon (IFN)- alpha 2b monotherapy (5 MU every 2 days for 3 months). Specimens were analyzed for HCV RNA by 4 different types of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Cobas Amplicor HCV-2.0 [Roche], LightCycler real-time PCR [Roche], and 2 in-house RT-PCRs) to determine whether specimen type can predict the rate of virologic response to high-dose treatment with IFN (10 MU every 2 days) and ribavirin (1-1.2 g/day).

RESULTS

Of the 56 patients who provided specimens, serum and plasma obtained from 18 tested negative for HCV RNA at the end of treatment, indicating a complete virologic response. In contrast, analysis of whole-blood specimens obtained at the same time revealed the presence of viral RNA in 12 of these 18 patients. All 12 subjects had relapse of HCV in serum and plasma: 11 relapsed a median of 4 weeks after the end of treatment, and 1 relapsed 20 weeks after the end of treatment. None of these 12 patients--all of whom consistently had whole-blood specimens that tested positive and plasma and serum specimens that tested negative for HCV RNA up to 20 weeks before the end of treatment--showed a sustained virologic response (P=.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of whole-blood tests for detection of HCV RNA were highly predictive of viral relapse (positive predictive value, 100%) and thus may be useful tools for monitoring and tailoring IFN/ribavirin therapy. Testing of only serum or plasma specimens underestimates the true circulating HCV load and leads to an overestimation of antiviral response rates.

Meta-analysis: combination therapy with interferon-alpha 2a/2b and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C previously non-responsive to interferon

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin treatment for patients not responding to interferon monotherapy is not well established.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with interferon-alpha 2a/2b plus ribavirin by performing a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases for randomized clinical trials of interferon-alpha 2a/2b plus ribavirin was conducted independently by two investigators. Data abstraction was performed. The primary end-point was a sustained virological response. Estimates of the common odds ratio were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 127 identified studies, 46 were considered for evaluation and 10 were included (1728 patients). The pooled sustained virological response was 12.6% (95% CI, 9.5-16.3%) for combination therapy vs. 2% (95% CI, 0.9-4.0%) for interferon monotherapy, with a common odds ratio of 5.49. Higher doses of interferon, a longer duration of therapy (48 weeks) and genotypes other than 1 and 4 were associated with an improvement in response. More side-effects and discontinuations were observed with combination therapy than with interferon monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-responders to interferon may benefit from re-treatment with combination therapy, especially from a 48-week regimen.

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Relatively few patients (< or =20%) with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response after interferon-alpha monotherapy. Hence, alternative treatment strategies such as the addition of the broad spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin to interferon-alpha-2b have been investigated. Combination therapy with subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2b [3 million units (MU) three times per week] plus oral ribavirin (1000 to 1200 mg/day) has proven effective in several well designed trials of 24 to 48 weeks' duration in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C. Compared with interferon-alpha-2b (3 or 6 MU three times per week) with or without placebo, combination treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin significantly enhanced end-of-treatment and sustained virological and biochemical response rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients [sustained virological response rates in treatment-naive recipients (6 to 19% vs 31 to 43% of patients); sustained overall (virological plus biochemical) response rates in nonresponders to (1 vs 14%) or relapsers (4 to 5% vs 30 to 44%) after previous interferon-alpha monotherapy]. Forty-eight weeks of combination therapy was superior to 24 weeks in treatment-naive patients infected with hepatitis virus C (HCV) genotype 1, whereas response rates were similar at 24 and 48 weeks in those infected with other HCV genotypes. Furthermore, there were marked improvements in histological inflammatory scores in patients who responded to treatment with either interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin or interferon-alpha-2b alone. Although adverse events associated with either drug during combination therapy occurred frequently, these were generally mild to moderate in intensity and were consistent with those reported for each individual agent. Twenty-six percent of patients required dosage modifications of one or both drugs during combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is an efficacious first- and second-line therapy in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C, significantly improving sustained virological and biochemical responses versus interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy. The tolerability profile of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy is consistent with the individual profiles of these agents with no evidence of additive effects. The place of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in relation to newer agents, including pegylated interferons-alpha and other multidrug regimens, remains to be determined in this rapidly evolving area of therapeutic management. Currently, combination therapy with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated liver disease, and is an option for use as second-line therapy in those who have relapsed after, or failed to respond to, previous treatment with interferon-alpha.

A randomized trial of high-dose interferon alpha-2b, with or without ribavirin, in chronic hepatitis C patients who have not responded to standard dose interferon

BACKGROUND

Conventional interferon monotherapy fails to achieve virological clearance in most hepatitis C-infected patients. The use of high-dose induction regimens may improve the initial clearance of virus, while the addition of ribavirin appears to improve the rates of sustained response once clearance is achieved.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with an induction regimen of high-dose interferon alpha-2b, with or without ribavirin, in chronic hepatitis C patients who have not responded to standard dose interferon monotherapy.

METHODS

Previous virological non-responders to standard dose interferon (3-5 MU three times weekly for > or = 12 weeks) were randomized to receive, unblind, either 10 MU interferon alpha-2b daily for 10 days, then 5 MU daily for 74 days, then 5 MU three times weekly for 24 weeks (total 36 weeks) (group A), or the above regimen with the addition of ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day, at day 11 (group B). All patients were followed up for 24 weeks after completion of therapy.

RESULTS

End of treatment virological response was noted in one of 10 (10%) patients in group A and in eight of 15 (54%) patients in group B (P=0.04). The sole end treatment responder in group A and three in group B relapsed on follow-up. The apparent improvement in response in group B compared to group A nearly reached statistical significance (group B 5/15 vs. group A 0/10; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small pilot study, a 36-week high-dose induction interferon monotherapy protocol did not yield sustained responses in previous non-responders to standard dose interferon. However, the same regimen with ribavirin yielded a 33% sustained response rate, nearly reaching statistical significance. The therapy was well tolerated, despite the higher doses of interferon used and the addition of ribavirin. High-dose interferon with ribavirin appears to be a therapeutic option for non-responders to conventional interferon monotherapy.

Hepatitis C: retreatment and treatment of patients with renal failure

This paper addresses two difficult issues in the treatment of hepatitis C: patients who fail to achieve a sustained response after the first course of treatment, and those who simultaneously suffer from chronic renal failure. With the recent improvements in firstline treatment, retreatment is mainly applicable to those who have previously received 6-month of interferon monotherapy at 3 MU thrice weekly. For those who had an end-of-treatment response but relapsed, there is a choice between interferon monotherapy at increased dose and/or duration of treatment, or a 6-month course of combination therapy. Retreatment of non-responders is generally unsuccessful, but some patients may respond to interferon-alpha 3 MU and ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g/day. For patients with chronic renal failure and hepatitis C, combination treatment is not possible because ribavirin is contraindicated. Interferon given at a dose of 1.5 MU thrice weekly was reported to be fairly well tolerated by patients who were on dialysis and resulted in end-of-treatment and sustained biochemical and virological response in some cases. Interferon given in the usual doses may be associated with severe adverse effects in patients with renal failure, and can precipitate allograft rejection in patients who have undergone renal transplantation.

The hepatic flaviviridae: summary

Hepatitis C envelope proteins (E1, E2) induce protective neutralizing antibodies. The extent of sequence diversity reflects the host's ability to control viral populations and the response to antiviral therapy. Attempts to prepare effective vaccines against HCV are foiled by lack of prolonged protective immunity. Plasmid vaccines and the use of uninfectious virus-like particles are being developed. HCV induces a cellular humoral immune response, but this is inadequate to clear the virus and the disease becomes chronic. In any patient, the natural history of HCV infection depends on the age when infected, and the presence of other diseases. The transfusion-related disease has a worse prognosis than that transmitted by syringes and needles. The outlook in 'healthy blood donors' is uncertain. Interferon therapy for 3 or preferably 6 months results in a sustained response in about 30% of patients. Negative serum HCV RNA and normal AST values after 3 months of therapy indicates that there may be a sustained response. Whether or not to stop treatment at that time if HCV is still positive remains a matter of debate. The role of interferon treatment in preventing progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer is still uncertain. Ribavirin therapy alone reduces transaminases and hepatic histology improves. Improved results follow the combination of ribavirin with interferon. Ribavirin may have immuno-modularity and anti-inflammatory actions. Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is unlikely to play a significant role in liver disease in man.