Lrp binds to two regions in the dadAX promoter region of Escherichia coli to repress and activate transcription directly

Escherichia coli Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein Bridges DNA In Vivo and Tunably Dissociates in the Presence of Exogenous Leucine

Feast-famine response proteins are a widely conserved class of global regulators in prokaryotes, the most highly studied of which is the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Lrp senses the environmental nutrition status and subsequently regulates up to one-third of the genes in E. coli, either directly or indirectly. Lrp exists predominantly as octamers and hexadecamers (16mers), where leucine is believed to shift the equilibrium toward the octameric state. In this study, we analyzed the effects of three oligomerization state mutants of Lrp in terms of their ability to bind to DNA and regulate gene expression in response to exogenous leucine. We find that oligomerization beyond dimers is required for Lrp's regulatory activity and that, contrary to previous speculation, exogenous leucine modulates Lrp activity at its target promoters exclusively by inhibiting Lrp binding to DNA. We also show evidence that Lrp binding bridges DNA over length scales of multiple kilobases, revealing a new range of mechanisms for Lrp-mediated transcriptional regulation. IMPORTANCE Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is one of the most impactful regulators in E. coli and other bacteria. Lrp senses nutrient conditions and responds by controlling strategies for virulence, cellular motility, and nutrient acquisition. Despite its importance and being evolutionarily highly conserved across bacteria and archaea, several mysteries remain regarding Lrp, including how it actually responds to leucine to change its regulation of targets. Previous studies have led to the hypothesis that Lrp switches between two states, an octamer (8 Lrp molecules together) and a hexadecamer (16 Lrp molecules together), upon exposure to leucine; these are referred to as different oligomerization states. Here, we show that contrary to previous expectations, it is Lrp's propensity to bind DNA, rather than its oligomerization state, that is directly affected by leucine in the cell's environment. Our new understanding of Lrp activity will aid in identifying and disrupting pathways used by bacteria to cause disease.

Nitrogen Metabolism in Pseudomonas putida: Functional Analysis Using Random Barcode Transposon Sequencing

Pseudomonas putida KT2440 has long been studied for its diverse and robust metabolisms, yet many genes and proteins imparting these growth capacities remain uncharacterized. Using pooled mutant fitness assays, we identified genes and proteins involved in the assimilation of 52 different nitrogen containing compounds. To assay amino acid biosynthesis, 19 amino acid drop-out conditions were also tested. From these 71 conditions, significant fitness phenotypes were elicited in 672 different genes including 100 transcriptional regulators and 112 transport-related proteins. We divide these conditions into 6 classes, and propose assimilatory pathways for the compounds based on this wealth of genetic data. To complement these data, we characterize the substrate range of three promiscuous aminotransferases relevant to metabolic engineering efforts in vitro. Furthermore, we examine the specificity of five transcriptional regulators, explaining some fitness data results and exploring their potential to be developed into useful synthetic biology tools. In addition, we use manifold learning to create an interactive visualization tool for interpreting our BarSeq data, which will improve the accessibility and utility of this work to other researchers. IMPORTANCE Understanding the genetic basis of P. putida's diverse metabolism is imperative for us to reach its full potential as a host for metabolic engineering. Many target molecules of the bioeconomy and their precursors contain nitrogen. This study provides functional evidence linking hundreds of genes to their roles in the metabolism of nitrogenous compounds, and provides an interactive tool for visualizing these data. We further characterize several aminotransferases, lactamases, and regulators, which are of particular interest for metabolic engineering.

Diversity, versatility and complexity of bacterial gene regulation mechanisms: opportunities and drawbacks for applications in synthetic biology

Gene expression occurs in two essential steps: transcription and translation. In bacteria, the two processes are tightly coupled in time and space, and highly regulated. Tight regulation of gene expression is crucial. It limits wasteful consumption of resources and energy, prevents accumulation of potentially growth inhibiting reaction intermediates, and sustains the fitness and potential virulence of the organism in a fluctuating, competitive and frequently stressful environment. Since the onset of studies on regulation of enzyme synthesis, numerous distinct regulatory mechanisms modulating transcription and/or translation have been discovered. Mostly, various regulatory mechanisms operating at different levels in the flow of genetic information are used in combination to control and modulate the expression of a single gene or operon. Here, we provide an extensive overview of the very diverse and versatile bacterial gene regulatory mechanisms with major emphasis on their combined occurrence, intricate intertwinement and versatility. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of well-characterized basal expression and regulatory elements in synthetic biology applications, where they may ensure orthogonal, predictable and tunable expression of (heterologous) target genes and pathways, aiming at a minimal burden for the host.

Endogenously generated 2-aminoacrylate inhibits motility in Salmonella enterica

Members of the broadly distributed Rid/YER057c/UK114 protein family have imine/enamine deaminase activity, notably on 2-aminoacrylate (2AA). Strains of Salmonella enterica, and other organisms lacking RidA, have diverse growth phenotypes, attributed to the accumulation of 2AA. In S. enterica, 2AA inactivates a number of pyridoxal 5’-phosephate(PLP)-dependent enzymes, some of which have been linked to the growth phenotypes of a ridA mutant. This study used transcriptional differences between S. enterica wild-type and ridA strains to explore the breadth of the cellular consequences that resulted from accumulation of 2AA. Accumulation of endogenously generated 2AA in a ridA mutant resulted in lower expression of genes encoding many flagellar assembly components, which led to a motility defect. qRT-PCR results were consistent with the motility phenotype of a ridA mutant resulting from a defect in FlhD₄C₂ activity. In total, the results of comparative transcriptomics correctly predicted a 2AA-dependent motility defect and identified additional areas of metabolism impacted by the metabolic stress of 2AA in Salmonella enterica. Further, the data emphasized the value of integrating global approaches with biochemical genetic approaches to understand the complex system of microbial metabolism.

Regulation Mechanism of the ald Gene Encoding Alanine Dehydrogenase in Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Lrp/AsnC Family Regulator AldR

In the presence of alanine, AldR, which belongs to the Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulators and regulates ald encoding alanine dehydrogenase in Mycobacterium smegmatis, changes its quaternary structure from a homodimer to an octamer with an open-ring conformation. Four AldR-binding sites (O2, O1, O4, and O3) with a consensus sequence of GA/T-N2-NWW/WWN-N2-A/TC were identified upstream of the M. smegmatis ald gene by means of DNase I footprinting analysis. O2, O1, and O4 are required for the induction of ald expression by alanine, while O3 is directly involved in the repression of ald expression. In addition to O3, both O1 and O4 are also necessary for full repression of ald expression in the absence of alanine, due to cooperative binding of AldR dimers to O1, O4, and O3. Binding of a molecule of the AldR octamer to the ald control region was demonstrated to require two AldR-binding sites separated by three helical turns between their centers and one additional binding site that is in phase with the two AldR-binding sites. The cooperative binding of AldR dimers to DNA requires three AldR-binding sites that are aligned with a periodicity of three helical turns. The aldR gene is negatively autoregulated independently of alanine. Comparative analysis of ald expression of M. smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis in conjunction with sequence analysis of both ald control regions led us to suggest that the expression of the ald genes in both mycobacterial species is regulated by the same mechanism.

IMPORTANCE

In mycobacteria, alanine dehydrogenase (Ald) is the enzyme required both to utilize alanine as a nitrogen source and to grow under hypoxic conditions by maintaining the redox state of the NADH/NAD(+) pool. Expression of the ald gene was reported to be regulated by the AldR regulator that belongs to the Lrp/AsnC (feast/famine) family, but the underlying mechanism was unknown. This study revealed the regulation mechanism of ald in Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Furthermore, a generalized arrangement pattern of cis-acting regulatory sites for Lrp/AsnC (feast/famine) family regulators is suggested in this study.

Expanded roles of leucine-responsive regulatory protein in transcription regulation of the Escherichia coli genome: Genomic SELEX screening of the regulation targets

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a transcriptional regulator for the genes involved in transport, biosynthesis and catabolism of amino acids in Escherichia coli. In order to identify the whole set of genes under the direct control of Lrp, we performed Genomic SELEX screening and identified a total of 314 Lrp-binding sites on the E. coli genome. As a result, the regulation target of Lrp was predicted to expand from the hitherto identified genes for amino acid metabolism to a set of novel target genes for utilization of amino acids for protein synthesis, including tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthases and rRNAs. Northern blot analysis indicated alteration of mRNA levels for at least some novel targets, including the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes. Phenotype MicroArray of the lrp mutant indicated significant alteration in utilization of amino acids and peptides, whilst metabolome analysis showed variations in the concentration of amino acids in the lrp mutant. From these two datasets we realized a reverse correlation between amino acid levels and cell growth rate: fast-growing cells contain low-level amino acids, whilst a high level of amino acids exists in slow-growing cells. Taken together, we propose that Lrp is a global regulator of transcription of a large number of the genes involved in not only amino acid transport and metabolism, but also amino acid utilization.

Regulation of the ald gene encoding alanine dehydrogenase by AldR in Mycobacterium smegmatis

The regulatory gene aldR was identified 95 bp upstream of the ald gene encoding L-alanine dehydrogenase in Mycobacterium smegmatis. The AldR protein shows sequence similarity to the regulatory proteins of the Lrp/AsnC family. Using an aldR deletion mutant, we demonstrated that AldR serves as both activator and repressor for the regulation of ald gene expression, depending on the presence or absence of L-alanine. The purified AldR protein exists as a homodimer in the absence of L-alanine, while it adopts the quaternary structure of a homohexamer in the presence of L-alanine. The binding affinity of AldR for the ald control region was shown to be increased significantly by L-alanine. Two AldR binding sites (O1 and O2) with the consensus sequence GA-N₂-ATC-N₂-TC and one putative AldR binding site with the sequence GA-N₂-GTT-N₂-TC were identified upstream of the ald gene. Alanine and cysteine were demonstrated to be the effector molecules directly involved in the induction of ald expression. The cellular level of L-alanine was shown to be increased in M. smegmatis cells grown under hypoxic conditions, and the hypoxic induction of ald expression appears to be mediated by AldR, which senses the intracellular level of alanine.

Lrp acts as both a positive and negative regulator for type 1 fimbriae production in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is known to be an indirect activator of type 1 fimbriae synthesis in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium via direct regulation of FimZ, a direct positive regulator for type 1 fimbriae production. Using RT-PCR, we have shown previously that fimA transcription is dramatically impaired in both lrp-deletion (Δlrp) and constitutive-lrp expression (lrp^C) mutant strains. In this work, we used chromosomal P_fimA-lacZ fusions and yeast agglutination assays to confirm and extend our previous results. Direct binding of Lrp to P_fimA was shown by an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and DNA footprinting assay. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the Lrp-binding motifs in P_fimA play a role in both activation and repression of type 1 fimbriae production. Overproduction of Lrp also abrogates fimZ expression. EMSA data showed that Lrp and FimZ proteins independently bind to P_fimA without competitive exclusion. In addition, both Lrp and FimZ binding to P_fimA caused a hyper retardation (supershift) of the DNA-protein complex compared to the shift when each protein was present alone. Nutrition-dependent cellular Lrp levels closely correlated with the amount of type 1 fimbriae production. These observations suggest that Lrp plays important roles in type 1 fimbriation by acting as both a positive and negative regulator and its effect depends, at least in part, on the cellular concentration of Lrp in response to the nutritional environment.

Recognition of DNA by the helix-turn-helix global regulatory protein Lrp is modulated by the amino terminus

The AsnC/Lrp family of regulatory proteins links bacterial and archaeal transcription patterns to metabolism. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates approximately 400 genes, over 200 of them directly. In earlier studies, lrp genes from Vibrio cholerae, Proteus mirabilis, and E. coli were introduced into the same E. coli background and yielded overlapping but significantly different regulons. These differences were seen despite amino acid sequence identities of 92% (Vibrio) and 98% (Proteus) to E. coli Lrp, including complete conservation of the helix-turn-helix motifs. The N-terminal region contains many of the sequence differences among these Lrp orthologs, which led us to investigate its role in Lrp function. Through the generation of hybrid proteins, we found that the N-terminal diversity is responsible for some of the differences between orthologs in terms of DNA binding (as revealed by mobility shift assays) and multimerization (as revealed by gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, and analytical ultracentrifugation). These observations indicate that the N-terminal tail plays a significant role in modulating Lrp function, similar to what is seen for a number of other regulatory proteins.

Regulation and characterization of the dadRAX locus for D-amino acid catabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

D-amino acids are essential components for bacterial peptidoglycan, and these natural compounds are also involved in cell wall remodeling and biofilm disassembling. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the dadAX operon, encoding the D-amino acid dehydrogenase DadA and the amino acid racemase DadX, is essential for D- and L-Ala catabolism, and its expression requires a transcriptional regulator, DadR. In this study, purified recombinant DadA alone was sufficient to demonstrate the proposed enzymatic activity with very broad substrate specificity; it utilizes all D-amino acids tested as substrates except D-Glu and D-Gln. DadA also showed comparable k(cat) and K(m) values on D-Ala and several D-amino acids. dadRAX knockout mutants were constructed and subjected to analysis of their growth phenotypes on amino acids. The results revealed that utilization of L-Ala, L-Trp, D-Ala, and a specific set of D-amino acids as sole nitrogen sources was abolished in the dadA mutant and/or severely hampered in the dadR mutant while growth yield on D-amino acids was surprisingly improved in the dadX mutant. The dadA promoter was induced by several L-amino acids, most strongly by Ala, and only by D-Ala among all tested D-amino acids. Enhanced growth of the dadX mutant on D-amino acids is consistent with the finding that the dadA promoter was constitutively induced in the dadX mutant, where exogenous D-Ala but not L-Ala reduced the expression. Binding of DadR to the dadA regulatory region was demonstrated by electromobility shift assays, and the presence of L-Ala but not D-Ala increased affinity by 3-fold. The presence of multiple DadR-DNA complexes in the dadA regulatory region was demonstrated in vitro, and the formation of these nucleoprotein complexes exerted a complicated impact on promoter activation in vivo. In summary, the results from this study clearly demonstrate DadA to be the enzyme solely responsible for the proposed D-amino acid dehydrogenase activity of broad substrate specificity and the physiological functions of DadRAX in catabolism of several D-amino acids and support L-Ala as the signal molecule for induction of the dadAX genes through DadR binding to several putative operator sites.

Discretely calibrated regulatory loops controlled by ppGpp partition gene induction across the 'feast to famine' gradient in Escherichia coli

Bacteria comprehensively reorganize their global gene expression when faced with starvation. The alarmone ppGpp facilitates this massive response by co-ordinating the downregulation of genes of the translation apparatus, and the induction of biosynthetic genes and the general stress response. Such a large reorientation requires the activities of multiple regulators, yet the regulatory network downstream of ppGpp remains poorly defined. Transcription profiling during isoleucine depletion, which leads to gradual starvation (over > 100 min), allowed us to identify genes that required ppGpp, Lrp and RpoS for their induction and to deduce the regulon response times. Although the Lrp and RpoS regulons required ppGpp for their activation, they were not induced simultaneously. The data suggest that metabolic genes, i.e. those of the Lrp regulon, require only a low level of ppGpp for their induction. In contrast, the RpoS regulon was induced only when high levels of ppGpp accumulated. We tested several predictions of a model that explains how bacteria allocate transcriptional resources between metabolism and stress response by discretely tuning two regulatory circuits to different levels of ppGpp. The emergent regulatory structure insures that stress survival circuits are only triggered if homeostatic metabolic networks fail to compensate for environmental deficiencies.

Unexpected coregulator range for the global regulator Lrp of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis

The Lrp/AsnC family of transcription factors links gene regulation to metabolism in bacteria and archaea. Members of this family, collectively, respond to a wide range of amino acids as coregulators. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates over 200 genes directly and is well known to respond to leucine and, to a somewhat lesser extent, alanine. We focused on Lrp from Proteus mirabilis and E. coli, orthologs with 98% identity overall and identical helix-turn-helix motifs, for which a previous study nevertheless found functional differences. Sequence differences between these orthologs, within and adjacent to the amino acid-responsive RAM domain, led us to test for differential sensitivity to coregulatory amino acids. In the course of this investigation, we found, via in vivo reporter fusion assays and in vitro electrophoretic mobility shift experiments, that E. coli Lrp itself responded to a broader range of amino acids than was previously appreciated. In particular, for both the E. coli and P. mirabilis orthologs, Lrp responsiveness to methionine was similar in magnitude to that to leucine. Both Lrp orthologs are also fairly sensitive to Ile, His, and Thr. These observations suggest that Lrp ties gene expression in the Enterobacteriaceae rather extensively to physiological status, as reflected in amino acid pools. These findings also have substantial implications for attempts to model regulatory architecture from transcriptome measurements or to infer such architecture from genome sequences, and they suggest that even well-studied regulators deserve ongoing exploration.

Characterization of alanine catabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its importance for proliferation in vivo

The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes a variety of infections in immunocompromised individuals, including individuals with the heritable disease cystic fibrosis. Like the carbon sources metabolized by many disease-causing bacteria, the carbon sources metabolized by P. aeruginosa at the host infection site are unknown. We recently reported that l-alanine is a preferred carbon source for P. aeruginosa and that two genes potentially involved in alanine catabolism (dadA and dadX) are induced during in vivo growth in the rat peritoneum and during in vitro growth in sputum (mucus) collected from the lungs of individuals with cystic fibrosis. The goals of this study were to characterize factors required for alanine catabolism in P. aeruginosa and to assess the importance of these factors for in vivo growth. Our results reveal that dadA and dadX are arranged in an operon and are required for catabolism of l-alanine. The dad operon is inducible by l-alanine, d-alanine, and l-valine, and induction is dependent on the transcriptional regulator Lrp. Finally, we show that a mutant unable to catabolize dl-alanine displays decreased competitiveness in a rat lung model of infection.

Incorporating prior information via shrinkage: a combined analysis of genome-wide location data and gene expression data

Transcriptional control is a critical step in regulation of gene expression. Understanding such a control on a genomic level involves deciphering the mechanisms and structures of regulatory programmes and networks. A difficulty arises due to the weak signal and high noise in various sources of data while most current approaches are limited to analysis of a single source of data. A natural alternative is to improve statistical efficiency and power by a combined analysis of multiple sources of data. Here we propose a shrinkage method to combine genome-wide location data and gene expression data to detect the binding sites or target genes of a transcription factor. Specifically, a prior 'non-target' gene list is generated by analysing the expression data, and then this information is incorporated into the subsequent binding data analysis via a shrinkage method. There is a Bayesian justification for this shrinkage method. Both simulated and real data were used to evaluate the proposed method and compare it with analysing binding data alone. In simulation studies, the proposed method gives higher sensitivity and lower false discovery rate (FDR) in detecting the target genes. In real data example, the proposed method can reduce the estimated FDR and increase the power to detect the previously known target genes of a broad transcription regulator, leucine responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) in Escherichia coli. This method can also be used to incorporate other information, such as gene ontology (GO), to microarray data analysis to detect differentially expressed genes.

Structure of the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein Lrp reveals a novel octameric assembly

The structure of Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) co-crystallized with a short duplex oligodeoxynucleotide reveals a novel quaternary assembly in which the protein octamer forms an open, linear array of four dimers. In contrast, structures of the Lrp homologs LrpA, LrpC and AsnC crystallized in the absence of DNA show that these proteins instead form highly symmetrical octamers in which the four dimers form a closed ring. Although the DNA is disordered within the Lrp crystal, comparative analyses suggest that the observed differences in quaternary state may arise from DNA interactions during crystallization. Interconversion of these conformations, possibly in response to DNA or leucine binding, provides an underlying mechanism to alter the relative spatial orientation of the DNA-binding domains. Breaking of the closed octamer symmetry may be a common essential step in the formation of active DNA complexes by all members of the Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulatory proteins.

Anatomy of Escherichia coli sigma70 promoters

Information theory was used to build a promoter model that accounts for the -10, the -35 and the uncertainty of the gap between them on a common scale. Helical face assignment indicated that base -7, rather than -11, of the -10 may be flipping to initiate transcription. We found that the sequence conservation of sigma70 binding sites is 6.5 +/- 0.1 bits. Some promoters lack a -35 region, but have a 6.7 +/- 0.2 bit extended -10, almost the same information as the bipartite promoter. These results and similarities between the contacts in the extended -10 binding and the -35 suggest that the flexible bipartite sigma factor evolved from a simpler polymerase. Binding predicted by the bipartite model is enriched around 35 bases upstream of the translational start. This distance is the smallest 5' mRNA leader necessary for ribosome binding, suggesting that selective pressure minimizes transcript length. The promoter model was combined with models of the transcription factors Fur and Lrp to locate new promoters, to quantify promoter strengths, and to predict activation and repression. Finally, the DNA-bending proteins Fis, H-NS and IHF frequently have sites within one DNA persistence length from the -35, so bending allows distal activators to reach the polymerase.

Modulation of the sensitivity of FimB recombination to branched-chain amino acids and alanine in Escherichia coli K-12

Phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli requires the site-specific recombination of a short invertible element. Inversion is catalyzed by FimB (switching in either direction) or FimE (inversion mainly from on to off) and is influenced by auxiliary factors integration host factor (IHF) and leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). These proteins bind to sites (IHF site II and Lrp sites 1 and 2) within the invertible element to stimulate recombination, presumably by bending the DNA to enhance synapses. Interaction of Lrp with a third site (site 3) cooperatively with sites 1 and 2 (termed complex 1) impedes recombination. Inversion is stimulated by the branched-chain amino acids (particularly leucine) and alanine, and according to a current model, the amino acids promote the selective loss of Lrp from site 3 (complex 2). Here we show that the central portion of the fim invertible element, situated between Lrp site 3 and IHF site II, is dispensable for FimB recombination but that this region is also required for full amino acid stimulation of inversion. Further work reveals that the region is likely to contain multiple regulatory elements. Lrp site 3 is shown to bind the regulatory protein with low affinity, and a mutation that enhances binding to this element is found both to diminish the stimulatory effects of IVLA on FimB recombination and to inhibit recombination in the absence of the amino acids. The results obtained emphasize the importance of Lrp site 3 as a control element but also highlight the complexity of the regulatory system that affects this site.

Influence of L-leucine and L-alanine on Lrp regulation of foo, coding for F1651, a Pap homologue

The foo operon encodes F165 1 fimbriae that belong to the P-regulatory family and are synthesized by septicemic Escherichia coli. Using an Lrp-deficient host and the lrp gene cloned under the arabinose pBAD promoter, we demonstrated that foo was transcribed proportionally to the amount of Lrp synthesized. L-leucine and L-alanine decreased drastically the steady-state transcription of foo and modified phase variation, independently of the presence of FooI. Specific mutations in the C-terminal region of Lrp reduced or abolished the repressive effect of these amino acids, indicating that they modulate F165 1 by affecting Lrp.

Biosynthesis of Glutamate, Aspartate, Asparagine, L-Alanine, and D-Alanine

Glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, L-alanine, and D-alanine are derived from intermediates of central metabolism, mostly the citric acid cycle, in one or two steps. While the pathways are short, the importance and complexity of the functions of these amino acids befit their proximity to central metabolism. Inorganic nitrogen (ammonia) is assimilated into glutamate, which is the major intracellular nitrogen donor. Glutamate is a precursor for arginine, glutamine, proline, and the polyamines. Glutamate degradation is also important for survival in acidic environments, and changes in glutamate concentration accompany changes in osmolarity. Aspartate is a precursor for asparagine, isoleucine, methionine, lysine, threonine, pyrimidines, NAD, and pantothenate; a nitrogen donor for arginine and purine synthesis; and an important metabolic effector controlling the interconversion of C3 and C4 intermediates and the activity of the DcuS-DcuR two-component system. Finally, L- and D-alanine are components of the peptide of peptidoglycan, and L-alanine is an effector of the leucine responsive regulatory protein and an inhibitor of glutamine synthetase (GS). This review summarizes the genes and enzymes of glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, L-alanine, and D-alanine synthesis and the regulators and environmental factors that control the expression of these genes. Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) deficient strains of E. coli, K. aerogenes, and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium grow normally in glucose containing (energy-rich) minimal medium but are at a competitive disadvantage in energy limited medium. Glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, L-alanine, and D-alanine have multiple transport systems.

The Lrp family of transcriptional regulators

Genome analysis has revealed that members of the Lrp family of transcriptional regulators are widely distributed among prokaryotes, both bacteria and archaea. The archetype Leucine-responsive Regulatory Protein from Escherichia coli is a global regulator involved in modulating a variety of metabolic functions, including the catabolism and anabolism of amino acids as well as pili synthesis. Most Lrp homologues, however, appear to act as specific regulators of amino acid metabolism-related genes. Like most prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, Lrp-like regulators consist of a DNA-binding domain and a ligand-binding domain. The crystal structure of the Pyrococcus furiosus LrpA revealed an N-terminal domain with a common helix-turn-helix fold, and a C-terminal domain with a typical alphabeta-sandwich fold. The latter regulatory domain constitutes a novel ligand-binding site and has been designated RAM. Database analysis reveals that the RAM domain is present in many prokaryotic genomes, potentially encoding (1) Lrp-homologues, when fused to a DNA-binding domain (2) enzymes, when fused as a potential regulatory domain to a catalytic domain, and (3) stand-alone RAM modules with unknown function. The architecture of Lrp regulators with two distinct domains that harbour the regulatory (effector-binding) site and the active (DNA-binding) site, and their separation by a flexible hinge region, suggests a general allosteric switch of Lrp-like regulators.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein-mediated repression of clp (encoding CS31A) expression by L-leucine and L-alanine in Escherichia coli

CS31A produced by septicemic and diarrheic Escherichia coli belongs to the Pap-regulatory family of adhesive factors, which are under methylation-dependent transcriptional regulation. Common features of operons encoding members of this family include two conserved GATC sites in the upstream regulatory region, and transcriptional regulators homologue to the PapB and PapI proteins. Methylation protection of GATC sites was previously shown to be dependent on the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Lrp and ClpB, the PapB equivalent, repressed clp basal transcription. A PapI homologue (AfaF) was required together with Lrp to establish the phase variation control, which gave rise to phase-ON cells that expressed CS31A and phase-OFF cells that did not express CS31A. In phase-OFF cells, the GATC(dist) site was methylated and the GATC(prox) site was protected from methylation, whereas in phase-ON cells, the inverse situation was found. Unlike Pap fimbriae, CS31A synthesis was dramatically reduced in media containing L-alanine or L-leucine. L-Alanine prevented the OFF-to-ON switch, locking clp expression in the OFF phase, whereas L-leucine repressed transcription without obvious effect on the switch frequency of phase variation. In phase-variable cells, leucine and alanine promoted methylation of GATC(dist) and methylation protection of GATC(prox), increasing the methylation pattern characteristic of repressed cells. Furthermore, alanine prevented the AfaF-dependent methylation protection of GATC(dist) and thus the appearance of phase-ON cells. In addition, analysis of clp expression in a Lrp-negative background indicated that alanine and leucine also repressed clp transcription by a methylation-independent mechanism.

The Sulfolobus solfataricus Lrp-like protein LysM regulates lysine biosynthesis in response to lysine availability

Although the archaeal transcription apparatus resembles the eukaryal RNA polymerase II system, many bacterial-like regulators can be found in archaea. Particularly, all archaeal genomes sequenced to date contain genes encoding homologues of Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein). Whereas Lrp-like proteins in bacteria are involved in regulation of amino acid metabolism, their physiological role in archaea is unknown. Although several archaeal Lrp-like proteins have been characterized recently, no target genes apart from their own coding genes have been discovered yet, and no ligands for these regulators have been identified so far. In this study, we show that the Lrp-like protein LysM from Sulfolobus solfataricus is involved in the regulation of lysine and possibly also arginine biosynthesis, encoded by the lys gene cluster. Exogenous lysine is the regulatory signal for lys gene expression and specifically serves as a ligand for LysM by altering its DNA binding affinity. LysM binds directly upstream of the TFB-responsive element of the intrinsically weak lysW promoter, and DNA binding is favored in the absence of lysine, when lysWXJK transcription is maximal. The combined in vivo and in vitro data are most compatible with a model in which the bacterial-like LysM activates the eukarya-like transcriptional machinery. As with transcriptional activation by Escherichia coli Lrp, activation by LysM is apparently dependent on a co-activator, which remains to be identified.

Structure of the Lrp-regulated serA promoter of Escherichia coli K-12

Expression of the Escherichia coli serA gene is activated in vivo by the product of the lrp gene, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), an effect partially reversed by L-leucine. We show here that serA is transcribed from two promoters, P1 45 bp upstream of the translation start site, and P2 92 bp further upstream. Lrp binds to a long AT-rich sequence from -158 to -82 from the start of the coding region, i.e. upstream of P1 and overlapping P2. It activates transcription from P1 and represses expression from P2. A second regulator, cAMP/CRP, activates P2, an effect that is largely inhibited by Lrp, such that catabolite repressor protein (Crp) and Lrp are rival activators of serA transcription.

Regulation of microcin C51 operon expression: the role of global regulators of transcription

Expression of the microcin C51 operon in Escherichia coli cells is regulated as a function of the phase of growth; it is stimulated during the decelerating phase of growth. Using single-copy P(mcc)-lac transcriptional fusion (the promoter region of the microcin C51 operon fused to a promoterless lac operon in lambda phage), we showed that transcription from the microcin operon promoter is dependent on sigma(s) (RpoS) factor. However, some level of P(mcc)-lac expression is possible in rpoS null mutants, indicating that another sigma factor might be involved in transcription of the microcin C51 operon. Overproduction of sigma70 decreased Pmcc-directed transcription, presumably as a result of competition of sigma factors for the limited amount of core RNA polymerase. The cyclic AMP-CRP complex was shown to stimulate transcription from Pmcc: the absence of CRP or cAMP in crp or cya mutant cells strongly decreased the level of P(mcc)-lac expression. The production of C51 microcin decreased or was absent in rpoS, crp and cya mutant cells. Leucine-responsive protein Lrp and histone-like protein H-NS repressed P(mcc)-lac expression in the exponential and decelerating phases of growth. In studies of P(mcc)-lac expression in double mutant cells, we showed that proteins CRP, Lrp and H-NS acted in rpoS-dependent and rpoS-independent ways in transcription of the microcin C51 operon. Mutation hns(-) resulted in an increase in P(mcc)-lac expression in crp, rpoS and lrp mutant cells, as in wild-type cells.

sigma factor selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: role for CRP, IHF and lrp transcription factors

osmY is a stationary phase-induced and osmotically regulated gene in Escherichia coli that requires the stationary phase RNA polymerase (Esigma(S)) for in vivo expression. We show here that the major RNA polymerase, Esigma(70), also transcribes osmY in vitro and, depending on genetic background, even in vivo. The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) bound to cAMP, the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and the integration host factor (IHF) inhibit transcription initiation at the osmY promoter. The binding site for CRP is centred at -12.5 from the transcription start site, whereas Lrp covers the whole promoter region. The site for IHF maps in the -90 region. By mobility shift assay, permanganate reactivity and in vitro transcription experiments, we show that repression is much stronger with Esigma(70) than with Esigma(S) holoenzyme. We conclude that CRP, Lrp and IHF inhibit open complex formation more efficiently with Esigma(70) than with Esigma(S). This different ability of the two holoenzymes to interact productively with promoters once assembled in complex nucleoprotein structures may be a crucial factor in generating sigma(S) selectivity in vivo.

Disruption of aldA influences the developmental process in Myxococcus xanthus

Previously, we identified a gene (aldA) from Myxococcus xanthus, which we suggested encoded the enzyme alanine dehydrogenase on the basis of similarity to known Ald protein sequences (M. J. Ward, H. Lew, A. Treuner-Lange, and D. R. Zusman, J. Bacteriol. 180:5668-5675, 1998). In this study, we have confirmed that aldA does encode a functional alanine dehydrogenase, since it catalyzes the reversible conversion of alanine to pyruvate and ammonia. Whereas an aldA gene disruption mutation did not significantly influence the rate of growth or spreading on a rich medium, AldA was required for growth on a minimal medium containing L-alanine as the major source of carbon. Under developmental conditions, the aldA mutation caused delayed aggregation in both wild-type (DZ2) and FB (DZF1) strains. Poorly formed aggregates and reduced levels of spores were apparent in the DZ2 aldA mutant, even after prolonged development.