The aspartate chemoreceptor Tar is effectively methylated by binding to the methyltransferase mainly through hydrophobic interaction

Chemoreceptors in Sinorhizobium meliloti require minimal pentapeptide tethers to provide adaptational assistance

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by posttranslational modifications of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli, the adaptation proteins CheR and CheB tether to a conserved C-terminal receptor pentapeptide. Here,we investigated the function of the pentapeptide motif (N/D)WE(E/N)F in Sinorhizobium meliloti chemotaxis. Isothermal titration calorimetry revealed stronger affinity of the pentapeptides to CheR and activated CheB relative to unmodified CheB. Strains with mutations of the conserved tryptophan in one or all four MCP pentapeptides resulted in a significant decrease or loss of chemotaxis to glycine betaine, lysine, and acetate, chemoattractants sensed by pentapeptide-bearing McpX and pentapeptide-lacking McpU and McpV, respectively. Importantly, we discovered that the pentapeptide mediates chemotaxis when fused to the C-terminus of pentapeptide-lacking chemoreceptors via a flexible linker. We propose that adaptational assistance and a threshold number of available sites enable the efficient docking of adaptation proteins to the chemosensory array. Altogether, these results demonstrate that S. meliloti effectively utilizes a pentapeptide-dependent adaptation system with a minimal number of tethering units to assist pentapeptide-lacking chemoreceptors and hypothesize that the higher abundance of CheR and CheB in S. meliloti compared to E. coli allows for ample recruitment of adaptation proteins to the chemosensory array.

Chemoreceptors with C-terminal pentapeptides for CheR and CheB binding are abundant in bacteria that maintain host interactions

Chemosensory pathways represent a major prokaryotic signal transduction mechanism that is based on signal sensing by chemoreceptors. An essential feature of chemosensory pathways is the CheR and CheB mediated control of chemoreceptor methylation causing pathway adaptation. At their C-terminal extension the Tar and Tsr model chemoreceptors contain a pentapeptide that acts as an additional CheR and CheB binding site. The relevance of this pentapeptide is poorly understood since pentapeptide removal from Tar/Tsr causes receptor inactivation, whereas many other chemoreceptors do not require this pentapeptide for correct function. We report here a bioinformatic analysis of pentapeptide containing chemoreceptors. These receptors were detected in 11 bacterial phyla and represent approximately 10% of all chemoreceptors. Pentapeptide containing chemoreceptors are mainly found in Gram-negative bacteria, are of low abundance in Gram-positive species and almost absent from archaea. Almost 50% of TarH (Tar homologue) ligand binding domain containing chemoreceptors possess pentapeptides, whereas chemoreceptor families with other ligand binding domains are devoid of pentapeptides. The abundance of chemoreceptors with C-terminal pentapeptides correlated negatively with the number of chemoreceptor genes per genome. The consensus sequence reveals a negative net charge for many pentapeptides. Pentapeptide containing chemoreceptors are very abundant in the order Enterobacterales, particularly in the families Pectobacterium and Dickeya, where they represent about 50% of the total number. In contrast, bacteria with primarily free living lifestyles have a reduced number of pentapeptides, such as approximately 1% for Pseudomonadales. It is proposed that pentapeptide function is related to mechanisms that permit host interaction.

Paradoxical enhancement of chemoreceptor detection sensitivity by a sensory adaptation enzyme

A sensory adaptation system that tunes chemoreceptor sensitivity enables motile Escherichia coli cells to track chemical gradients with high sensitivity over a wide dynamic range. Sensory adaptation involves feedback control of covalent receptor modifications by two enzymes: CheR, a methyltransferase, and CheB, a methylesterase. This study describes a CheR function that opposes the signaling consequences of its catalytic activity. In the presence of CheR, a variety of mutant serine chemoreceptors displayed up to 40-fold enhanced detection sensitivity to chemoeffector stimuli. This response enhancement effect did not require the known catalytic activity of CheR, but did involve a binding interaction between CheR and receptor molecules. Response enhancement was maximal at low CheR:receptor stoichiometry and quantitative analyses argued against a reversible binding interaction that simply shifts the ON-OFF equilibrium of receptor signaling complexes. Rather, a short-lived CheR binding interaction appears to promote a long-lasting change in receptor molecules, either a covalent modification or conformation that enhances their response to attractant ligands.

In silico and proteomic analysis of protein methyltransferase CheR from Bacillus subtilis

Protein methyltransferase (CheR) catalyzes the methylation of the cytosolic domain of the membrane bound chemotaxis receptors, and plays a pivotal role in the chemotactic signal transduction pathway in bacteria. Crystal structure of CheR is available only from the gram-negative bacterium Salmonella typhimurium (StCheR), which contain a catalytic C-terminal domain, encompassing a β-subdomain, connected via a linker to the N-terminal domain. The structural-functional similitude between CheR of the gram-negative and the gram-positive bacteria remains obscure. We investigated CheR, from a gram-positive bacterium, Bacillus subtilis (BsCheR), and have identified the functional roles of its N-terminal domain, by using the in silico molecular modeling and docking approach along with mass spectrophotometry and sequence analysis. The structural studies established that the N-terminal domain directly bound to S-Adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH). Structural and sequence analyses revealed that the α2 helix of the N-terminal domain was involved in the recognition of the methylation site of the chemotactic receptor. Additionally, immunoblot analysis showed that the purified BsCheR was phosphorylated. Further, mass spectrometry studies detected the phosphorylation at Thr3 position in the N-terminal domain of BsCheR. Phosphorylation of BsCheR suggested a regulatory role of the N-terminal domain, analogous to its antagonistic enzyme, the chemotaxis-specific methylesterase (CheB).

Specificity of the CheR2 methyltransferase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is directed by a C-terminal pentapeptide in the McpB chemoreceptor

Methyltransferases of the CheR family and methylesterases of the CheB family control chemoreceptor methylation, and this dynamic posttranslational modification is necessary for proper chemotaxis of bacteria. Studies with enterobacteria that contain a single CheR or CheB show that, in addition to binding at the methylation site, some chemoreceptors bind CheR or CheB through additional high-affinity sites at distinct pentapeptide sequences in the chemoreceptors. We investigated the recognition of chemoreceptors by CheR proteins in the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Of the four methyltransferases in PAO1, we detected an interaction only between CheR2 and the chemoreceptor methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein B (McpB), which contains the pentapeptide GWEEF at its carboxyl terminus. Furthermore, CheR2 was also the only paralog that methylated McpB in vitro, and deletion of the pentapeptide sequence abolished both the CheR2-McpB interaction and the methylation of McpB. When clustered according to protein sequence, bacterial CheR proteins form two distinct families-those that bind pentapeptide-containing chemoreceptors and those that do not. These two families are distinguished by an insertion of three amino acids in the β-subdomain of CheR. Deletion of this insertion in CheR2 prevented its interaction with and methylation of McpB. Pentapeptide-containing chemoreceptors are common to many bacteria species; thus, these short, distinct motifs may enable the specific assembly of signaling complexes that mediate different responses.

Salmonella chemoreceptors McpB and McpC mediate a repellent response to L-cystine: a potential mechanism to avoid oxidative conditions

Chemoreceptors McpB and McpC in Salmonella enterica have been reported to promote chemotaxis in LB motility-plate assays. Of the chemicals tested as potential effectors of these receptors, the only response was towards L-cysteine and its oxidized form, L-cystine. Although enhanced radial migration in plates suggested positive chemotaxis to both amino acids, capillary assays failed to show an attractant response to either, in cells expressing only these two chemoreceptors. In vivo fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements of kinase activity revealed that in wild-type bacteria, cysteine and cystine are chemoeffectors of opposing sign, the reduced form being a chemoattractant and the oxidized form a repellent. The attractant response to cysteine was mediated primarily by Tsr, as reported earlier for Escherichia coli. The repellent response to cystine was mediated by McpB/C. Adaptive recovery upon cystine exposure required the methyl-transferase/-esterase pair, CheR/CheB, but restoration of kinase activity was never complete (i.e. imperfect adaptation). We provide a plausible explanation for the attractant-like responses to both cystine and cysteine in motility plates, and speculate that the opposing signs of response to this redox pair might afford Salmonella a mechanism to gauge and avoid oxidative environments.

Molecular modeling of flexible arm-mediated interactions between bacterial chemoreceptors and their modification enzyme

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by methylation and demethylation of specific glutamyl residues in the cytoplasmic domain of chemoreceptors. Methylation is catalyzed by methyltransferase CheR. In E. coli and related organisms, methylation sufficiently rapid to be physiologically effective requires a carboxyl terminal pentapeptide sequence on the receptor being modified or, via adaptational assistance, on a neighboring homodimer in a receptor cluster. Pentapeptide-enhanced methylation is thought to be mediated by a approximately 30 residue, potentially disordered sequence that serves as a flexible arm connecting the receptor body and pentapeptide-bound methyltransferase, thus allowing diffusionally restricted enzyme to reach methyl-accepting sites. However, it was not known how many or which sites on the same or neighboring receptors were accessible to the tethered enzyme. We investigated using molecular modeling and found that, in a hexagonal array of trimers of receptor dimers, CheR tethered to a dimer of chemoreceptor Tar by its native 30-residue flexible-arm sequence could reach all methyl-accepting sites on the dimer to which it was tethered plus 48 methyl-accepting sites distributed among nine neighboring dimers, equivalent to the total sites carried by six receptors. This modeling-determined methylation neighborhood of one enzyme-binding dimer and six neighbors corresponds precisely with the experimentally identified neighborhood of seven. Thus, the experimentally observed adaptational assistance can occur by docking of pentapeptide-bound, diffusionally restricted enzyme to methyl-accepting sites on neighboring receptors. Our analysis introduces the notion that physiologically relevant adaptational assistance could occur even if only a subset of sites on a particular receptor are within reach.

Phenotypic Suppression Methods for Analyzing Intra‐ and Inter‐Molecular Signaling Interactions of Chemoreceptors

The receptors that mediate chemotactic behaviors in E. coli and other motile bacteria and archaea are exquisite molecular machines. They detect minute concentration changes in the organism's chemical environment, integrate multiple stimulus inputs, and generate a highly amplified output signal that modulates the cell's locomotor pattern. Genetic dissection and suppression analyses have played an important role in elucidating the molecular mechanisms that underlie chemoreceptor signaling. This chapter discusses three examples of phenotypic suppression analyses of receptor signaling defects. (i) Balancing suppression can occur in mutant receptors that have biased output signals and involves second-site mutations that create an offsetting bias change. Such suppressors can arise in many parts of the receptor and need not involve directly interacting parts of the molecule. (ii) Conformational suppression within a mutant receptor molecule occurs through a mutation that directly compensates for the initial structural defect. This form of suppression should be highly dependent on the nature of the structural alterations caused by the original mutation and its suppressor, but in practice may be difficult to distinguish from balancing suppression without high-resolution structural information about the mutant and pseudorevertant proteins. (iii) Conformational suppression between receptor molecules involves correction of a functional defect in one receptor by a mutational change in a heterologous receptor with which it normally interacts. The suppression patterns exhibit allele-specificity with respect to the compensatory residue positions and amino acid side chains, a hallmark of stereospecific protein-protein interactions.

Functional analysis of nine putative chemoreceptor proteins in Sinorhizobium meliloti

The genome of the symbiotic soil bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti contains eight genes coding for methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) McpS to McpZ and one gene coding for a transducer-like protein, IcpA. Seven of the MCPs are localized in the cytoplasmic membrane via two membrane-spanning regions, whereas McpY and IcpA lack such hydrophobic regions. The periplasmic regions of McpU, McpV, and McpX contain the small-ligand-binding domain Cache. In addition, McpU possesses the ligand-binding domain TarH. By probing gene expression with lacZ fusions, we have identified mcpU and mcpX as being highly expressed. Deletion of any one of the receptor genes caused impairments in the chemotactic response toward most organic acids, amino acids, and sugars in a swarm plate assay. The data imply that chemoreceptor proteins in S. meliloti can sense more than one class of carbon source and suggest that many or all receptors work as an ensemble. Tactic responses were virtually eliminated for a strain lacking all nine receptor genes. Capillary assays revealed three important sensors for the strong attractant proline: McpU, McpX, and McpY. Receptor deletions variously affected free-swimming speed and attractant-induced chemokinesis. Noticeably, cells lacking mcpU were swimming 9% slower than the wild-type control. We infer that McpU inhibits the kinase activity of CheA in the absence of an attractant. Cells lacking one of the two soluble receptors were impaired in chemokinetic proficiency by more than 50%. We propose that the internal sensors, IcpA and the PAS domain containing McpY, monitor the metabolic state of S. meliloti.

Characterization of the Thermotoga maritima chemotaxis methylation system that lacks pentapeptide-dependent methyltransferase CheR:MCP tethering

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modifications of specific glutamate and glutamine residues within the cytoplasmic domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, efficient methylation of MCPs depends on the localization of methyltransferase CheR to MCP clusters through an interaction between the CheR beta-subdomain and a pentapeptide sequence (NWETF or NWESF) at the C-terminus of the MCP. In vitro methylation analyses utilizing S. enterica and Thermotoga maritima CheR proteins and MCPs indicate that MCP methylation in T. maritima occurs independently of a pentapeptide-binding motif. Kinetic and binding measurements demonstrate that despite efficient methylation, the interaction between T. maritima CheR and T. maritima MCPs is of relatively low affinity. Comparative protein sequence analyses of CheR beta-subdomains from organisms having MCPs that contain and/or lack pentapeptide-binding motifs identified key similarities and differences in residue conservation, suggesting the existence of two distinct classes of CheR proteins: pentapeptide-dependent and pentapeptide-independent methyltransferases. Analysis of MCP C-terminal ends showed that only approximately 10% of MCPs contain a putative C-terminal binding motif, the majority of which are restricted to the different proteobacteria classes (alpha, beta, gamma, delta). These findings suggest that tethering of CheR to MCPs is a relatively recent event in evolution and that the pentapeptide-independent methylation system is more common than the well-characterized pentapeptide-dependent methylation system.

Similarities and differences in interactions of the activity-enhancing chemoreceptor pentapeptide with the two enzymes of adaptational modification

Sensory adaptation and chemotaxis by Escherichia coli require a specific pentapeptide at the chemoreceptor carboxyl terminus. This sequence binds the two enzymes of receptor adaptational modification, enhancing catalysis, but with different binding features and mechanisms. We investigated the relative importance of each pentapeptide side chain for the two enhancing interactions.

Carboxyl-terminal extensions beyond the conserved pentapeptide reduce rates of chemoreceptor adaptational modification

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modification of chemoreceptors. Specific glutamyl residues are methylated and demethylated in reactions catalyzed by methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB. In the well-characterized chemosensory systems of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp., efficient modification by either enzyme is dependent on a conserved pentapeptide sequence, NWETF or NWESF, present at the extreme carboxyl terminus of high-abundance chemoreceptors. To what extent is position at the extreme carboxyl terminus important for pentapeptide-mediated enhancement of adaptational modification? Is this position equally important for enhancement of both enzyme activities? To address these questions, we created forms of high-abundance receptor Tsr or Tar carrying one, six, or eight additional amino acids extending beyond the pentapeptide at their carboxyl termini and assayed methylation, demethylation, deamidation, and ability to mediate chemotaxis. In vitro and in vivo, all three carboxyl-terminal extensions reduced pentapeptide-mediated enhancement of rates of adaptational modification. CheB-catalyzed reactions were more affected than CheR-catalyzed reactions. Effects were less severe for the complete sensory system in vivo than for the minimal system of receptor and modification enzymes in vitro. Notably, extended receptors mediated chemotaxis as efficiently as wild-type receptors, providing a striking example of robustness in chemotactic systems. This could reflect compensatory reductions of rates for both modification reactions, mitigation of effects of slower reactions by the intertwined circuitry of signaling and adaptation, or tolerance of a range of reactions rates for adaptational modification. No matter what the mechanism, the observations provide a challenging test for mathematical models of chemotaxis.

Collaborative signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors

Motile bacteria seek optimal living habitats by following gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals in their environment. The signaling machinery for these chemotactic behaviors, although assembled from just a few protein components, has extraordinary information-processing capabilities. Escherichia coli, the best-studied model, employs a networked cluster of transmembrane receptors to detect minute chemical stimuli, to integrate multiple and conflicting inputs, and to generate an amplified output signal that controls the cell's flagellar motors. Signal gain arises through cooperative action of chemoreceptors of different types. The signaling-teams within a receptor cluster may be built from trimers of receptor dimers that communicate through shared connections to their partner signaling proteins.

Targeting of the chemotaxis methylesterase/deamidase CheB to the polar receptor-kinase cluster in an Escherichia coli cell

Chemotactic adaptation to persisting stimulation involves reversible methylation of the chemoreceptors that form complexes with the histidine kinase CheA at a cell pole. The methyltransferase CheR targets to the C-terminal NWETF sequence of the chemoreceptor. In contrast, localization of the methylesterase CheB is largely unknown, although regulation of its activity via phosphorylation is central to adaptation. In this study, green fluorescent protein was fused to full-length CheB or its various parts: the N-terminal regulatory domain (N), the C-terminal catalytic domain (C) and the linker (L). The full-length and NL fusions and, to a lesser extent, the LC fusion localized to a pole. Deletion of the P2 domain from CheA abolished polar localization of the full-length and NL fusions, but did not affect that of the LC fusion. Pull-down assays demonstrated that the NL fragment, but not the LC fragment, binds to the P2 fragment of CheA. These results indicate that binding of the NL domain to the P2 domain targets CheB to the polar signalling complex. The LC fusion, like the chemoreceptor, partially localized in the absence of CheA, suggesting that the LC domain may interact with its substrate sites, either as part of the protein or as a proteolytic fragment.

Dual recognition of the bacterial chemoreceptor by chemotaxis-specific domains of the CheR methyltransferase

Adaptation to persisting stimulation is required for highly sensitive detection of temporal changes of stimuli, and often involves covalent modification of receptors. Therefore, it is of vital importance to understand how a receptor and its cognate modifying enzyme(s) modulate each other through specific protein-protein interactions. In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, adaptation requires methylation of chemoreceptors (e.g. Tar) catalyzed by the CheR methyltransferase. CheR binds to the C-terminal NWETF sequence of a chemoreceptor that is distinct from the methylation sites. However, little is known about how CheR recognizes its methylation sites or how it is distributed in a cell. In this study, we used comparative genomics to demonstrate that the CheR chemotaxis methyltransferase contains three structurally and functionally distinct modules: (i) the catalytic domain common to a methyltransferase superfamily; (ii) the N-terminal domain; and (iii) the beta-subdomain of the catalytic domain, both of which are found exclusively in chemotaxis methyltransferases. The only evolutionary conserved motif specific to CheR is the positively charged face of helix alpha2 in the N-terminal domain. The disulfide cross-linking analysis suggested that this face interacts with the methylation helix of Tar. We also demonstrated that CheR localizes to receptor clusters at cell poles via interaction of the beta-subdomain with the NWETF sequence. Thus, the two chemotaxis-specific modules of CheR interact with distinct regions of the chemoreceptor for targeting to the receptor cluster and for recognition of the substrate sites, respectively.

Intragenic suppressors of a mutation in the aspartate chemoreceptor gene that abolishes binding of the receptor to methyltransferase

In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, receptor methylation is the key process of adaptation. The methyltransferase CheR binds to the carboxy-terminal NWETF sequence of major chemoreceptors. The substitution of Ala for Trp of this sequence (W550A) of the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) abolishes its CheR-binding ability. In this study, six independent intragenic suppressors of the mutation were isolated. They were divided into two classes. Tar carrying the class I suppressors (G278A-L488M, T334A, G278A, G278C and A398T) showed signal biases toward tumbling, corresponding to increased activities of the receptor-associated histidine kinase CheA. These suppressors further reduced the unstimulated methylation level of Tar-W550A, but allowed slight but significant stimulation of methylation by aspartate. Some other CheA-activating mutations were also found to serve as class I suppressors. These results suggest that the class I suppressors compensate for the signal bias of Tar-W550A caused by its low methylation level and that the NWETF sequence is required primarily to maintain an appropriate level of methylation by increasing the local concentration of CheR around the receptor. The class II suppressor was a mutation in the termination codon (Op554W) resulting in the addition of 11 residues containing an xWxxF motif. This revertant Tar supported chemotaxis and was methylated almost as effectively as wild-type Tar. This effect was reversed by introducing a mutation in the xWxxF motif. These results reinforce the importance of the xWxxF motif and suggest that the motif does not have to be located at the extreme carboxy terminus.

Binding and diffusion of CheR molecules within a cluster of membrane receptors

Adaptation of the attractant response in Escherichia coli is attributable to the methylation of its transmembrane chemotactic receptors by the methyltransferase CheR. This protein contains two binding domains, one for the sites of methylation themselves and the other for a flexible tether at the C terminus of the receptor. We have explored the theoretical consequences of this binding geometry for a CheR molecule associated with a cluster of chemotactic receptors. Calculations show that the CheR molecule will bind with high net affinity to the receptor lattice, having a high probability of being attached by one or both of its domains at any instant of time. Because of the relatively low affinity of its individual domains and the close proximity of neighboring receptors, it is likely that when one domain unbinds it will reattach to the array before the other domain unbinds. Stochastic simulations show that the enzyme will move through the receptor cluster in a hand-over-hand fashion, like a gibbon swinging through the branches of a tree. We explore the possible consequences of this motion, which we term "molecular brachiation", for chemotactic adaptation and suggest that a similar mechanism may be operative in other large assemblies of protein molecules.

The superfamily of chemotaxis transducers: from physiology to genomics and back

Chemotaxis transducers are specialized receptors that microorganisms use in order to sense the environment in directing their motility to favorable niches. The Escherichia coli transducers are models for studying the sensory and signaling events at the molecular level. Extensive studies in other organisms and the arrival of genomics has resulted in the accumulation of sequences of many transducer genes, but they are not fully understood. In silico analysis provides some assistance in classification of various transducers from different species and in predicting their function. All transducers contain two structural modules: a conserved C-terminal multidomain module, which is a signature element of the transducer superfamily, and a variable N-terminal module, which is responsible for the diversity within the superfamily. These structural modules have two distinct functions: the conserved C-terminal module is involved in signaling and adaptation, and the N-terminal module is involved in sensing various stimuli. Both C-terminal and N-terminal modules appear to be mobile genetic elements and subjects of duplication and lateral transfer. Although chemotaxis transducers are found exclusively in prokaryotic organisms that have some type of motility (flagellar, gliding or pili-based), several types of domains that are found in their N-terminal modules are also present in signal transduction proteins from eukaryotes, including humans. This indicates that basic principles of sensory transduction are conserved throughout the phylogenetic tree and that the chemotaxis transducer superfamily is a valuable source of novel sensory elements yet to be discovered.

CheR- and CheB-dependent chemosensory adaptation system of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has multiple homologues of most of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis genes, organized in three major operons and other, unlinked, loci. These include cheA(1) and cheR(1) (che Op(1)) and cheA(2), cheR(2), and cheB(1) (che Op(2)). In-frame deletions of these cheR and cheB homologues were constructed and the chemosensory behaviour of the resultant mutants examined on swarm plates and in tethered cell assays. Under the conditions tested, CheR(2) and CheB(1) were essential for normal chemotaxis, whereas CheR(1) was not. cheR(2) and cheB(1), but not cheR(1), were also able to complement the equivalent E. coli mutants. However, none of the proteins were required for the correct polar localization of the chemoreceptor McpG in R. sphaeroides. In E. coli, CheR binds to the NWETF motif on the high-abundance receptors, allowing methylation of both high- and low-abundance receptors. This motif is not contained on any R. sphaeroides chemoreceptors thus far identified, although 2 of the 13 putative chemoreceptors, McpA and TlpT, do have similar sequences. This suggests that CheR(2) either interacts with the NWETF motif of E. coli methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), even though its native motif may be slightly different, or with another conserved region of the MCPs. Methanol release measurements show that R. sphaeroides has an adaptation system that is different from that of Bacillus subtilis and E. coli, with methanol release measurable on the addition of attractant but not on its removal. Intriguingly, CheA(2), but not CheA(1), is able to phosphorylate CheB(1), suggesting that signaling through CheA(1) cannot initiate feedback receptor adaptation via CheB(1)-P.