Retrospective comparison between COBE SPECTRA and SPECTRA OPTIA apheresis systems for hematopoietic progenitor cells collection for autologous and allogeneic transplantation in a single center

INTRODUCTION

COBE SPECTRA [COBE] (Terumo, BCT Lakewood CO) apheresis system has been the most used device for hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) collection. Recently, it has been replaced by the SPECTRA OPTIA [OPTIA] (Terumo, BCT Lakewood CO) apheresis system. The aim of our study is to compare both methods for HPC collection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 302 HPC collection apheresis procedures (115 allogeneic donors and 187 autologous). The study cohort was divided according to the apheresis system used to analyze the differences between COBE and OPTIA, specifically efficacy of apheresis procedure and product characteristics.

RESULTS

OPTIA collections result in a higher CD34⁺ collection efficiency in both groups (autologous 45.3% vs 41%, P < .006; allogeneic 54.9% vs 45%, P < .0001). The total of CD34⁺ cells ×10⁶ /kg recipient collected in the product were comparable in both groups (autologous 2.9 in OPTIA group vs 2.8 in COBE group, P = .344; allogeneic 6.2 in OPTIA group vs 5.8 in COBE group, P = .186). The percentage of platelet loss in autologous donors was significantly lower (35.7% vs 40.8%, P < .01). Regarding quality of the product, we observed a significantly lower hematocrit in products collected with OPTIA in both groups (1.8% vs 4%, P < .0001) as well as significantly lower amount of leukocytes (median 153.4 vs 237.2 × 10⁹ /L in autologous, P < .0001; 239.5 vs 340.2 × 10⁹ /L in allogeneic P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Both apheresis systems are comparable in collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells, with significantly higher collection efficiency with the OPTIA system. Collection products obtained with OPTIA contain significantly lower hematocrit and leukocytes.

Impact of CD34+ pre-counting and plerixafor on autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection in Japanese university hospitals in eight years

OBJECTIVE

Over the past decade, there have been two major advancements in autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, namely enumeration of CD 34+ cells for apheresis prediction and use of plerixafor to assist mobilization of PBSC. This study aimed to investigate changes in the efficacy of PBSC collection from two Japanese university hospitals over an eight-year period.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A series of 399 PBSC collection procedures from 239 patients with solid malignant tumors (ST, n = 42), malignant lymphoma (ML, n = 91), multiple myeloma (MM, n = 99), and others (amyloidosis and leukemia, n = 7) from two university hospitals from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. We also analyzed the effects of CD34+ pre-counting and plerixafor administration in improving CD34+ cell yield.

RESULTS

Using CD34+ pre-count as a reference, the frequency of apheresis was reduced and the yield of CD34+ cells increased in patients with ST. When administrating plerixafor, especially with a CD34+ pre-count <20/μL, the yield of CD34+ cells was significantly increased in patients with ML (p = 0.02) and MM (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

We verified that CD34+ cell counting and plerixafor administration contributed to effective PBSC collections in our hospitals for the eight-year study period. In patients with ST, CD34+ pre-count threshold for starting apheresis was ≥10/μL. CD34+ pre-count (<20/μL) was useful to select appropriate patients for plerixafor administration among the patients with ML and MM.

Enabling stem cell therapies for tissue repair: current and future challenges

Stem cells embody the tremendous potential of the human body to develop, grow, and repair throughout life. Understanding the biologic mechanisms that underlie stem cell-mediated tissue regeneration is key to harnessing this potential. Recent advances in molecular biology, genetic engineering, and material science have broadened our understanding of stem cells and helped bring them closer to widespread clinical application. Specifically, innovative approaches to optimize how stem cells are identified, isolated, grown, and utilized will help translate these advances into effective clinical therapies. Although there is growing interest in stem cells worldwide, this enthusiasm must be tempered by the fact that these treatments remain for the most part clinically unproven. Future challenges include refining the therapeutic manipulation of stem cells, validating these technologies in randomized clinical trials, and regulating the global expansion of regenerative stem cell therapies.

Comparing peripheral blood stem cell collection using the COBE Spectra, Haemonetics MCS+, and Baxter Amicus

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the most common source of hematopoietic cells for allogeneic or autologous blood and marrow transplantation (BMT). We performed an evaluation of PBSC collections using three different apheresis systems in two major transplantation centers in Singapore. Patients undergoing autologous BMT and donors collecting for allogeneic BMT were harvested using the COBE Spectra, Haemonetics MCS+, or Baxter Amicus. There were 99 Spectra collections (61 were autologous), 81 MCS+ collections (35 were autologous) and 38 Amicus collections (33 were autologous). Our data shows that the Amicus not only processed larger peripheral blood volumes but also yielded larger PBSC volume (P-value<0.05). In terms of PBSC products, the Spectra produced more WBC, WBC/liter blood processed, and WBC/kg (P-value<0.05). The Spectra and MCS+ produced comparable amount of CD34+ cells. Amicus collected 50% less platelets compared to Spectra and MCS+. The total CD34+ cells in the PBSC products was linearly correlated to the circulating CD34+ cells using Spectra, MCS+, and Amicus. Our results suggest that, compared to MCS+ and Amicus, collecting PBSC using the COBE Spectra can produce more WBC with a similar number of CD34+ cells. With a linear correlation of circulating CD34+ cells to the total CD34+ cells in the products, the availability of an automated procedure, no rotating seal, and a small extracorporeal volume, the Spectra appears to be the preferred machine for PBSC collection.

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autologous use: performance enhancements of COBE spectra, auto-PBSC

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) must be performed in a safe and effective manner. Issues like automation, collection efficiency (CE), and adverse events must be considered. Auto-PBSC (COBE Spectra) is a fully automated program for PBSC collection. Changes in the protocol were made to achieve high CE, low product volume, and resulted in three groups of patients. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) were developed to reduce citrate toxicity and patients with central venous catheter. Twenty patients and 27 collections (Group 1), 88 patients and 112 collections (Group 2), and 158 patients and 194 collections (Group 3) were recorded. The protocol changes increased CE significantly from 31% (Group 1) to 57 and 59% (Group 2 and 3). Adjusting endpoint according to the preapheresis number of CD34+ cells reduced the collection time and the volume of the product significantly (median 227 min and 56 mL) without affecting CE. Mean level of ionized calcium before collection was 1.22 mmol/L, measured in 31 patients. This declined to a mean of 1.07 mmol/L after 1 h of collection and remained unchanged despite continuous calcium infusion. The number of patients with mild symptoms of citrate toxicity was reduced from 20 to 6%. A central venous catheter was used in 15%. Compared to peripheral access no differences in blood flow rate or time to perform the collection were found. Changes in the Auto-PBSC protocol resulted in an improved CE and a small product. SOPs reduced the number of patients with citrate toxicity and with central venous catheter.

Automatic interface-controlled apheresis collection of stem/progenitor cells: results from an autologous donor validation trial of a novel stem cell apheresis device

BACKGROUND

Cryopreserved hematopoietic progenitor cells collected by apheresis from granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor with or without chemotherapy-mobilized patients have become the preferred type of autograft to support treatment of diseases amenable to high-dose chemotherapy. A novel apheresis system, the Spectra Optia v.5.0 (CaridianBCT), was constructed to meet certain shortcomings of manual apheresis systems such as the COBE Spectra MNC (CaridianBCT), including the need for continuous optical or manual monitoring and readjustment of buffy coat position and sensitivity to inconsistent blood flow. By use of optical sensors, which provide real-time automatic interface (buffy coat) and collection line control, the Spectra Optia promises to automatically guide apheresis procedures, potentially freeing up operator time and reducing variability in collection efficiency (CE2).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a two-center clinical trial, 35 autologous stem cell donors were subjected to apheresis with the Spectra Optia to validate feasibility and effectiveness of apheresis procedures. Results were compared to data from 80 autologous apheresis procedures with the COBE Spectra MNC.

RESULTS

Usability and function of the automatic interface management were excellent. CD34+ cell quality, assessed by viability staining, colony-forming unit-culture frequency, and engraftment kinetics, was equally good with both systems. CE2 of the Spectra Optia, calculated as CD34+ contents in the product divided by the number of CD34+ cells presented to the collection port, exceeded that of the COBE Spectra MNC. Spectra Optia product volumes were significantly smaller. Very high white blood cell and platelet counts modestly reduced CE2 with the Spectra Optia.

CONCLUSION

The Spectra Optia is a novel automatic apheresis system supporting autologous stem cell collection with at least equal efficiency and superior user-friendliness compared to the COBE Spectra MNC.

Optimization of leukocyte collection and monocyte isolation for dendritic cell culture

Leukapheresis is the method of choice to collect monocytes for dendritic cell (DC) culture. Improvement of cell separators and cell collection software have enabled the collection of 10(9) monocytes for the generation of monocyte-derived DCs, which is sufficient to prepare a DC vaccine series. However, leukapheresis works with the technique of differential centrifugation which is not applicable to selectively collect mononuclear cells of similar density. After leukapheresis, thus, additional preparation steps are required to isolate and enrich the desired monocyte population. The cell isolation and cultivation techniques depend on the quality of the original leukocyte harvest due to the monocyte yield and the content of residual erythrocytes and platelets. Monocyte elutriation from the leukapheresis product shows a high monocyte recovery of 80%. However, only 30% of the isolated monocytes can be developed into mature DCs. The factors responsible for DC maturation and the development of different DC subsets are the subject of current research.

Evaluation of the COM.TEC cell separator in predicting the yield of harvested CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND

This multicenter study was performed with the intention to evaluate the exactness of the predicted CD34+ cell yield calculated by two leukapheresis programs of the cell separator COM.TEC upon the number of donor's circulating CD34+ cells and the blood volume processed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients and healthy donors (n = 166) received mobilization by chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and underwent CD34+ cell harvest by the leukapheresis programs MNC or RV-PBSC (n = 203).

RESULTS

CD34+ cells were collected by 112 harvests on MNC and by 91 collections on RV-PBSC. The median collection efficiency of CD34+ cells was significantly better for the program MNC than for RV-PBSC (p < 0.001): 67% (31-109) vs. 42% (19-100). The collected CD34+ cell yield was in median more exactly by MNC than by RV-PBSC (p < 0.001): 85% (31-176) vs. 59% (22-110) of the predicted value. Concentrates obtained by RV-PBSC showed in median significantly higher percentages of mononuclear cells (p < 0.001) and CD34+ cells (p < 0.001), 86% (43-99) vs. 56% (25-95) and 1.2% (0.2-14.3) vs. 0.4% (0.1-6.0), and had lower contaminations by erythrocytes (p < 0.001) and platelets (p < 0.001), 13 mL (4-48) vs. 25 mL (5-60) and 1.9 x 1011 vs. 3.1 x 1011, than those harvested by MNC.

CONCLUSION

The significantly better collection efficiency of CD34+ cells and the more exact prediction of the harvested CD34+ cell yield make the leukapheresis program MNC a safe and efficient procedure. However, concentrates collected by RV-PBSC are of a better cellular quality with a significantly higher percentage of mononuclear and CD34+ cells and a lower contamination by erythrocytes and platelets.

Peripheral blood stem cell yield in 400 normal donors mobilised with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF): impact of age, sex, donor weight and type of G-CSF used

Mobilised peripheral blood is now the main source of stem cells collected from normal donors. We report our experience of mobilising and collecting 400 normal healthy donors using standardised procedures and techniques. Target recipient doses were reached with one aphaeresis in 63% of donors and with two aphereses in 81% of donors. Approximately 2% of donors yielded such low progenitor values that they were termed 'poor mobilisers'. There were minor effects of donor age, weight and sex and where possible, larger male donors under the age of 55 years should be selected. Two forms of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were used at the same dose and no significant difference was seen in the yield of CD34+ cells collected/l of blood processed. However, a greater number of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells were harvested using lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) compared with filgrastim (non-glycosylated G-CSF; P = 0.002). CD34+ cell yields were also measured halfway through the aphaeresis procedure. This was found to be highly predictive of final yield and facilitated distribution of the stem cell product to other centres. The observation that CD34+ yields did not decline in the second half compared with the first half of aphaeresis suggests that the circulating cell numbers are not static.

Clinical impact of a new automated system employed for peripheral blood stem cell collection

At the moment, PBSC collections can be performed using semi-automated or automated cell separator devices. The automated methods offer the advantages of a decreased working load for dedicated personnel and high standardization of the collection procedure. Herein we report our single institutional experience in 80 PBSC collections employing the new automated COM.TEC Fresenius autoMNC program that provides the ability to predict the total number of CD34(+) cells collected, based on the pre-leukapheresis CD34(+) cell count in peripheral blood. Fourty-eight patients and 21 healthy donors were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF or G-CSF alone, respectively. Eighty leukapheresis collections were performed starting with a CD34(+) cell count in peripheral blood at least of 20/microL. Collection parameters and related side effects were evaluated. The mean CD34(+) cell collection efficiency in patients and donors was 81.8% (sd 27.6) and 95.1% (sd 15.6), respectively. The mean difference between real and predicted CD34(+) cells was +30.2% (sd 92.9) for patients and +4.6% (sd 30.3) for donors. The mean leukapheresis bag volume was 240.7 ml (sd 67.3) and 310.3 ml (sd 86.8) with a mean HCT of 10.9% (sd 34.4) and 9.2% (sd 3.9) for patients and donors, respectively. The automated PBSC collection with the new program COM.TEC Fresenius autoMNC demonstrated a very high CD34(+) cell collection efficiency. Moreover, the ability to predict the CD34(+) cell yield permits improved management of the leukapheresis collection, with the only disadvantage of larger leukapheresis volume and higher hematocrit.

The effect of peptide stimulation on haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation including engraftment characteristics and a note on donor side effects

Aplasia or irreversible bone marrow failure and a variety of haematologic malignancies, as well as an increasing number of solid tumours, currently include various forms of marrow or equivalent transplantation in routine management. In both allogeneic and autologous procedures stable recipient immunohaematopoietic reconstitution depends upon infusing the requisite population harvested at a precise time following commencement of a stimulatory peptide. In a first step this prospective study documented the safety of apheresis, defined side effects and enumerated mononuclear, CD34+ and CD3+ cells obtained. In the second stage delivery of the graft, characterised in this way and with the additional measurement of in vitro growth in clonogenic assay, to the suitably conditioned patient was correlated with recovery of neutrophil and platelet numbers appearing in the circulation. In a third and ongoing analysis the influence of passenger T-lymphocytes is being evaluated for impact on infection and a potential anti-tumour effect. The conclusion is that this technology is reliable, has a high degree of patient acceptability without untoward complications, and that local results correspond to international experience thereby providing an important and relevant measure of quality control.

Mononuclear cell collection in patients undergoing extra-corporeal photo-chemotherapy for acute and chronic graft-vs.-host-disease (GvHD): comparison between COBE Spectra version 4.7 and 6.0 (AutoPBSC)

A constant improvement in the performance of blood cell separators has been observed in recent years, allowing better yields in peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) either from healthy donors or for autologous purposes. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, no reports on the efficiency of mononuclear cell (MNC) collection in patients undergoing extra-corporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) for graft-vs.-host-disease (GvHD) have been published. We retrospectively investigated the efficiency of 167 MNC collections performed consecutively in 12 patients between January 1999 and June 2001 by means of the COBE Spectra version 4.7 (V 4.7) or version 6.0 (V 6.0), for 109 and 58 procedures, respectively. MNC fractional extraction (FE) was higher in the V 6.0 group compared to the V 4.7 group : 0.59 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.22 (P < 0.05). However, platelet contamination was lower in the products obtained with V.6.0 compared to those obtained with V.4.7: 740 ( 630 x 10(3)/(L vs. 2,073 ( 1,429 x 10(3)/(L (P < 0.05). Only two patients with acute GvHD, both from V 4.7 group, required post-ECP platelet transfusion. The recently released version 6.0 allowed a satisfactory MNC yield with minimal platelet contamination in patients scheduled to undergo ECP for acute or chronic GvHD.

Comparison of two leukapheresis programs for computerized collection of blood progenitor cells on a new cell separator

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) can be collected on various cell separators. Two leukapheresis programs (LP-MNC and LP-PBSC-Lym) were evaluated for computerized collection of PBPCs on a new cell separator.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Leukapheresis assisted by the LP-MNC or LP-PBSC-Lym software was performed for the harvesting of PBPCs in 52 oncology patients after chemotherapy plus G-CSF treatment and in 18 healthy subjects after G-CSF mobilization alone.

RESULTS

A total of 38 components from 33 donors via LP-MNC and 43 components from 37 donors via LP-PBSC-Lym were collected with a median of one (range, one to two) standard-volume leukapheresis procedures (9.2-13.3 L) per donor. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning median counts of WBCs, CD34+ cells, CD34+ cell yields per harvest, and CD34+ cell yields of cumulative harvests. The blood cell counts after leukapheresis revealed that the LP-MNC resulted in significantly higher platelet loss than LP-PBSC-Lym (p = 0.024): 35.9 percent (range, 19.2%-66.1%) versus 29.7 percent (11.6%-52.3%). Regarding the CD34+ cell collection efficiency, the LP-MNC program was significantly better than the LP-PBSC-Lym program (p < 0.001): 77.5 percent (range, 35.5%-98.9%) versus 58.3 percent (range, 20.4%-98.9%). However, concentrates collected by the LP-PBSC-Lym program had significantly higher percentages of MNCs (p < 0.001) and CD34+ cells (p = 0.028) than harvests with the LP-MNC program: 90 percent (range, 69%-99%) versus 70 percent (range, 35%-98%) and 1.2 percent (range, 0.2%-7.3%) versus 0.7 percent (range, 0.2%-6.0%), respectively. No leukapheresis-related serious adverse events were seen, and time for hematopoietic engraftment was equivalent to data published in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The LP-MNC program shows a significantly better CD34+ cell collection efficiency than the LP-PBSC-Lym program. However, collections with the LP-MNC program result in PBPC components with a lower MNC and CD34+ cell concentrations and a higher apheresis-related loss of patient's platelets.

Adverse events in peripheral progenitor cell collection: a 7-year experience

Collection of peripheral progenitor cells (PPC) by apheresis machines is generally regarded as a safe procedure. However, data about adverse events in PPC harvesting are scarce. In a monocentric retrospective study, the data of 540 PPC collections in a period of 7 years were reviewed. Adverse events were subdivided in collection-associated technical problems and patient/donor-related side effects. Patient/donor-related side effects occurred most often (19.8%); most of them were paresthesias due to citrate toxicity. Paresthesias were treated by oral (20.4%) or intravenous (1.1%) calcium supplementation. Problems with venous access were also seen frequently, resulting in blood flow alarms (11.3%) and blockades in the return line (4.3%). A total of 6.9% of these problems were catheter associated, requiring revision of the central venous line in 2.6%. Technical problems with the blood cell separators were observed in 11.7%. Ten PPC collections were discontinued due to adverse events. The data of this retrospective, monocentric analysis show that patient/donor-associated problems were observed in every fifth PPC harvest. Most of them were paresthesias, which could be easily treated by calcium supplementation. Problems with venous access and technical problems with the cell separators occurred in every tenth PPC collection.