Preclinical safety profile of plasma prepared using the INTERCEPT Blood System

Photodynamic treatment of pathogens

The current viral pandemic has highlighted the compelling need for effective and versatile treatments, that can be quickly tuned to tackle new threats, and are robust against mutations. Development of such treatments is made even more urgent in view of the decreasing effectiveness of current antibiotics, that makes microbial infections the next emerging global threat. Photodynamic effect is one such method. It relies on physical processes proceeding from excited states of particular organic molecules, called photosensitizers, generated upon absorption of visible or near infrared light. The excited states of these molecules, tailored to undergo efficient intersystem crossing, interact with molecular oxygen and generate short lived reactive oxygen species (ROS), mostly singlet oxygen. These species are highly cytotoxic through non-specific oxidation reactions and constitute the basis of the treatment. In spite of the apparent simplicity of the principle, the method still has to face important challenges. For instance, the short lifetime of ROS means that the photosensitizer must reach the target within a few tens nanometers, which requires proper molecular engineering at the nanoscale level. Photoactive nanostructures thus engineered should ideally comprise a functionality that turns the system into a theranostic means, for instance, through introduction of fluorophores suitable for nanoscopy. We discuss the principles of the method and the current molecular strategies that have been and still are being explored in antimicrobial and antiviral photodynamic treatment.

Hypoplastic thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusion: therapeutic goals

Platelet transfusions consist a major part of the management of hypoplastic thrombocytopenia, the latter occurring mainly among patients with hematological malignancies. Platelet transfusions have led to a reduction of deaths attributable to thrombocytopenia-induced bleeding, despite their possible complications; nonetheless, prophylactic administration of platelets to patients with severe thrombocytopenia or before invasive procedures should be based on specific criteria, as well as therapeutic administration during active bleeding. Recently developed ex-vivo procedures have resulted in producing safer blood products, yet it remains unclear whether these pathogen-inactivated products have sufficient efficacy. What is more, another significant problem that remains to be more effectively addressed is the developing refractoriness to platelet transfusions.

High-Resolution Single Particle Zeta Potential Characterisation of Biological Nanoparticles using Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing

Physicochemical properties of nanoparticles, such as size, shape, surface charge, density, and porosity play a central role in biological interactions and hence accurate determination of these characteristics is of utmost importance. Here we propose tunable resistive pulse sensing for simultaneous size and surface charge measurements on a particle-by-particle basis, enabling the analysis of a wide spectrum of nanoparticles and their mixtures. Existing methodologies for measuring zeta potential of nanoparticles using resistive pulse sensing are significantly improved by including convection into the theoretical model. The efficacy of this methodology is demonstrated for a range of biological case studies, including measurements of mixed anionic, cationic liposomes, extracellular vesicles in plasma, and in situ time study of DNA immobilisation on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles. The high-resolution single particle size and zeta potential characterisation will provide a better understanding of nano-bio interactions, positively impacting nanomedicine development and their regulatory approval.

Pathogen-reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusions are used to prevent and treat bleeding in people who are thrombocytopenic. Despite improvements in donor screening and laboratory testing, a small risk of viral, bacterial, or protozoal contamination of platelets remains. There is also an ongoing risk from newly emerging blood transfusion-transmitted infections for which laboratory tests may not be available at the time of initial outbreak.One solution to reduce the risk of blood transfusion-transmitted infections from platelet transfusion is photochemical pathogen reduction, in which pathogens are either inactivated or significantly depleted in number, thereby reducing the chance of transmission. This process might offer additional benefits, including platelet shelf-life extension, and negate the requirement for gamma-irradiation of platelets. Although current pathogen-reduction technologies have been proven to reduce pathogen load in platelet concentrates, a number of published clinical studies have raised concerns about the effectiveness of pathogen-reduced platelets for post-transfusion platelet count recovery and the prevention of bleeding when compared with standard platelets.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of pathogen-reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding in people of any age requiring platelet transfusions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 9), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1937), the Transfusion Evidence Library (from 1950), and ongoing trial databases to 24 October 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing the transfusion of pathogen-reduced platelets with standard platelets, or comparing different types of pathogen-reduced platelets.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five new trials in this update of the review. A total of 15 trials were eligible for inclusion in this review, 12 completed trials (2075 participants) and three ongoing trials. Ten of the 12 completed trials were included in the original review. We did not identify any RCTs comparing the transfusion of one type of pathogen-reduced platelets with another.Nine trials compared Intercept® pathogen-reduced platelets to standard platelets, two trials compared Mirasol® pathogen-reduced platelets to standard platelets; and one trial compared both pathogen-reduced platelets types to standard platelets. Three RCTs were randomised cross-over trials, and nine were parallel-group trials. Of the 2075 participants enrolled in the trials, 1981 participants received at least one platelet transfusion (1662 participants in Intercept® platelet trials and 319 in Mirasol® platelet trials).One trial included children requiring cardiac surgery (16 participants) or adults requiring a liver transplant (28 participants). All of the other participants were thrombocytopenic individuals who had a haematological or oncological diagnosis. Eight trials included only adults.Four of the included studies were at low risk of bias in every domain, while the remaining eight included studies had some threats to validity.Overall, the quality of the evidence was low to high across different outcomes according to GRADE methodology.We are very uncertain as to whether pathogen-reduced platelets increase the risk of any bleeding (World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 1 to 4) (5 trials, 1085 participants; fixed-effect risk ratio (RR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.15; I2 = 59%, random-effect RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.38; I2 = 59%; low-quality evidence).There was no evidence of a difference between pathogen-reduced platelets and standard platelets in the incidence of clinically significant bleeding complications (WHO Grade 2 or higher) (5 trials, 1392 participants; RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.25; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), and there is probably no difference in the risk of developing severe bleeding (WHO Grade 3 or higher) (6 trials, 1495 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.02; I2 = 32%; moderate-quality evidence).There is probably no difference between pathogen-reduced platelets and standard platelets in the incidence of all-cause mortality at 4 to 12 weeks (6 trials, 1509 participants; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.29; I2 = 26%; moderate-quality evidence).There is probably no difference between pathogen-reduced platelets and standard platelets in the incidence of serious adverse events (7 trials, 1340 participants; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.35; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). However, no bacterial transfusion-transmitted infections occurred in the six trials that reported this outcome.Participants who received pathogen-reduced platelet transfusions had an increased risk of developing platelet refractoriness (7 trials, 1525 participants; RR 2.94, 95% CI 2.08 to 4.16; I2 = 0%; high-quality evidence), though the definition of platelet refractoriness differed between trials.Participants who received pathogen-reduced platelet transfusions required more platelet transfusions (6 trials, 1509 participants; mean difference (MD) 1.23, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.61; I2 = 27%; high-quality evidence), and there was probably a shorter time interval between transfusions (6 trials, 1489 participants; MD -0.42, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.32; I2 = 29%; moderate-quality evidence). Participants who received pathogen-reduced platelet transfusions had a lower 24-hour corrected-count increment (7 trials, 1681 participants; MD -3.02, 95% CI -3.57 to -2.48; I2 = 15%; high-quality evidence).None of the studies reported quality of life.We did not evaluate any economic outcomes.There was evidence of subgroup differences in multiple transfusion trials between the two pathogen-reduced platelet technologies assessed in this review (Intercept® and Mirasol®) for all-cause mortality and the interval between platelet transfusions (favouring Intercept®).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this review were based on 12 trials, and of the 1981 participants who received a platelet transfusion only 44 did not have a haematological or oncological diagnosis.In people with haematological or oncological disorders who are thrombocytopenic due to their disease or its treatment, we found high-quality evidence that pathogen-reduced platelet transfusions increase the risk of platelet refractoriness and the platelet transfusion requirement. We found moderate-quality evidence that pathogen-reduced platelet transfusions do not affect all-cause mortality, the risk of clinically significant or severe bleeding, or the risk of a serious adverse event. There was insufficient evidence for people with other diagnoses.All three ongoing trials are in adults (planned recruitment 1375 participants) with a haematological or oncological diagnosis.

Update on pathogen inactivation treatment of plasma, with the INTERCEPT Blood System: Current position on methodological, clinical and regulatory aspects

After the INTERCEPT Blood System for pathogen inactivation (PI) of plasma was locally validated and approved and is now in routine use in Portugal, a conference was arranged in Portugal, by the IPST, in Coimbra, on 19th November 2014. One of the presentations informed about the current status of the INTERCEPT technology for plasma and a subsequent round table discussion, focused on the methodological and logistical aspects as well as on the experience from clinical studies and routine therapeutic use of INTERCEPT treated plasma units. Moreover, in view of current interests, both the global regulatory issues and hemovigilance data obtained were highlighted. This manuscript provides a brief summary of what has been discussed during presentations and the Q/A round table session. It was agreed between speaker and the moderator of the session to report a consensus opinion on the importance of INTERCEPT to improve the safety of plasma products in a standardized way in terms of quality indicators of hemostasis and the clinical effectiveness as well as the reliability of the technology for plasma pathogen inactivation, to be reported as part of a theme section from Portugal and to be published in Transfusion Apheresis Science in early 2015. The session started showing the beneficial advantages of the INTERCEPT technology, which has already become the standard of practice in Portugal and in more than 20 other countries, and then highlighted some of the methodological and global quality/clinical aspects, which are not usually discussed. We hope the topic discussed here would be of interest to readers of Transfusion Apheresis Science.

Modern banking, collection, compatibility testing and storage of blood and blood components

The clinical practice of blood transfusion has changed considerably over the last few decades. The potential risk of transfusion transmissible diseases has directed efforts towards the production of safe and high quality blood. All transfusion services now operate in an environment of ever-increasing regulatory controls encompassing all aspects of blood collection, processing and storage. Stringent donor selection, identification of pathogens that can be transmitted through blood, and development of technologies that can enhance the quality of blood, have all led to a substantial reduction in potential risks and complications associated with blood transfusion. In this article, we will discuss the current standards required for the manufacture of blood, starting from blood collection, through processing and on to storage.

In vitro and in vivo characterization of ultraviolet light C-irradiated human platelets in a 2 event mouse model of transfusion

UV-based pathogen reduction technologies have been developed in recent years to inactivate pathogens and contaminating leukocytes in platelet transfusion products in order to prevent transfusion-transmitted infections and alloimmunization. UVC-based technology differs from UVA or UVB-based technologies in that it uses a specific wavelength at 254 nm without the addition of any photosensitizers. Previously, it was reported that UVC irradiation induces platelet aggregation and activation. To understand if UVC-induced changes of platelet quality correlate with potential adverse events when these platelets are transfused into animals, we used a 2-event SCID mouse model in which the predisposing event was LPS treatment and the second event was infusion of UVC-irradiated platelets. We analyzed lung platelet accumulation, protein content in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as an indication of lung injury, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) release in mice received UVC-irradiated or untreated control platelets. Our results showed UVC-irradiated platelets accumulated in lungs of the mice in a dose-dependent manner. High-doses of UVC-irradiated platelets were sequestered in the lungs to a similar level as we previously reported for UVB-irradiated platelets. Unlike UVB-platelets, UVC-platelets did not lead to lung injury or induce MIP-2 release. This could potentially be explained by our observation that although UVC treatment activated platelet surface αIIbβ3, it failed to activate platelet cells. It also suggests lung platelet accumulation and subsequent lung damage are due to different and separate mechanisms which require further investigation.

Oxygen removal during pathogen inactivation with riboflavin and UV light preserves protein function in plasma for transfusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Photochemical pathogen inactivation technologies (PCT) for individual transfusion products act by inhibition of replication through irreversibly damaging nucleic acids. Concern on the collateral impact of PCT on the blood component's integrity has caused reluctance to introduce this technology in routine practice. This work aims to uncover the mechanism of damage to plasma constituents by riboflavin pathogen reduction technology (RF-PRT).

METHODS

Activity and antigen of plasma components were determined following RF-PRT in the presence or absence of dissolved molecular oxygen.

RESULTS

Employing ADAMTS13 as a sentinel molecule in plasma, our data show that its activity and antigen are reduced by 23 ± 8% and 29 ± 9% (n = 24), respectively, which corroborates with a mean decrease of 25% observed for other coagulation factors. Western blotting of ADAMTS13 shows decreased molecular integrity, with no obvious indication of additional proteolysis nor is riboflavin able to directly inhibit the enzyme. However, physical removal of dissolved oxygen prior to RF-PRT protects ADAMTS13 as well as FVIII and fibrinogen from damage, indicating a direct role for reactive oxygen species. Redox dye measurements indicate that superoxide anions are specifically generated during RF-PRT. Protein carbonyl content as a marker of disseminated irreversible biomolecular damage was significantly increased (3·1 ± 0·8 vs. 1·6 ± 0·5 nmol/mg protein) following RF-PRT, but not in the absence of dissolved molecular oxygen (1·8 ± 0·4 nmol/mg).

CONCLUSIONS

RF-PRT of single plasma units generates reactive oxygen species that adversely affect biomolecular integrity of relevant plasma constituents, a side-effect, which can be bypassed by applying hypoxic conditions during the pathogen inactivation process.

Update on the use of pathogen-reduced human plasma and platelet concentrates

The use of pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) for labile blood components is slowly but steadily increasing. While pathogen-reduced plasma is already used routinely, efficacy and safety concerns impede the widespread use of pathogen-reduced platelets. The supportive and often prophylactic nature of blood component therapy in a variety of clinical situations complicates the clinical evaluation of these novel blood products. However, an increasing body of evidence on the clinical efficacy, safety, cost-benefit ratio and development of novel technologies suggests that pathogen reduction has entered a stage of maturity that could further increase the safety margin in haemotherapy. This review summarizes the clinical evidence on PRTs for plasma and platelet products that are currently licensed or under development.

Pathogen-reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusions are used to prevent and treat bleeding in patients who are thrombocytopenic. Despite improvements in donor screening and laboratory testing, a small risk of viral, bacterial or protozoal contamination of platelets remains. There is also an ongoing risk from newly emerging blood transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) for which laboratory tests may not be available at the time of initial outbreak.One solution to reduce further the risk of TTIs from platelet transfusion is photochemical pathogen reduction, a process by which pathogens are either inactivated or significantly depleted in number, thereby reducing the chance of transmission. This process might offer additional benefits, including platelet shelf-life extension, and negate the requirement for gamma-irradiation of platelets. Although current pathogen-reduction technologies have been proven significantly to reduce pathogen load in platelet concentrates, a number of published clinical studies have raised concerns about the effectiveness of pathogen-reduced platelets for post-transfusion platelet recovery and the prevention of bleeding when compared with standard platelets.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of pathogen-reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding in patients requiring platelet transfusions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to 18 February 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 18 February 2013), CINAHL (1982 to 18 February 2013) and the Transfusion Evidence Library (1980 to 18 February 2013). We also searched several international and ongoing trial databases and citation-tracked relevant reference lists. We requested information on possible unpublished trials from known investigators in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the transfusion of pathogen-reduced platelets with standard platelets. We did not identify any RCTs which compared the transfusion of one type of pathogen-reduced platelets with another.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author screened all references, excluding duplicates and those clearly irrelevant. Two authors then screened the remaining references, confirmed eligibility, extracted data and analysed trial quality independently. We requested and obtained a significant amount of missing data from trial authors. We performed meta-analyses where appropriate using the fixed-effect model for risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and used the I² statistic to explore heterogeneity, employing the random-effects model when I² was greater than 30%.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials comparing pathogen-reduced platelets with standard platelets. Nine trials assessed Intercept® pathogen-reduced platelets and one trial Mirasol® pathogen-reduced platelets. Two were randomised cross-over trials and the remaining eight were parallel-group RCTs. In total, 1422 participants were available for analysis across the 10 trials, of which 675 participants received Intercept® and 56 Mirasol® platelet transfusions. Four trials assessed the response to a single study platelet transfusion (all Intercept®) and six to multiple study transfusions (Intercept® (N = 5), Mirasol® (N = 1)) compared with standard platelets.We found the trials to be generally at low risk of bias but heterogeneous regarding the nature of the interventions (platelet preparation), protocols for platelet transfusion, definitions of outcomes, methods of outcome assessment and duration of follow-up.Our primary outcomes were mortality, 'any bleeding', 'clinically significant bleeding' and 'severe bleeding', and were grouped by duration of follow-up: short (up to 48 hours), medium (48 hours to seven days) or long (more than seven days). Meta-analysis of data from five trials of multiple platelet transfusions reporting 'any bleeding' over a long follow-up period found an increase in bleeding in those receiving pathogen-reduced platelets compared with standard platelets using the fixed-effect model (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15, I² = 59%); however, this meta-analysis showed no difference between treatment arms when using the random-effects model (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.38).There was no evidence of a difference between treatment arms in the number of patients with 'clinically significant bleeding' (reported by four out of the same five trials) or 'severe bleeding' (reported by all five trials) (respectively, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21, I² = 2%; RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.12, I² = 51%). We also found no evidence of a difference between treatment arms for all-cause mortality, acute transfusion reactions, adverse events, serious adverse events and red cell transfusion requirements in the trials which reported on these outcomes. No bacterial transfusion-transmitted infections occurred in the six trials that reported this outcome.Although the definition of platelet refractoriness differed between trials, the relative risk of this event was 2.74 higher following pathogen-reduced platelet transfusion (RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.84 to 4.07, I² = 0%). Participants required 7% more platelet transfusions following pathogen-reduced platelet transfusion when compared with standard platelet transfusion (MD 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11, I² = 21%), although the interval between platelet transfusions was only shown to be significantly shorter following multiple Intercept® pathogen-reduced platelet transfusion when compared with standard platelet transfusion (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.37, I² = 0%). In trials of multiple pathogen-reduced platelets, our analyses showed the one- and 24-hour count and corrected count increments to be significantly inferior to standard platelets. However, one-hour increments were similar in trials of single platelet transfusions, although the 24-hour count and corrected count increments were again significantly lower.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a difference in mortality, 'clinically significant' or 'severe bleeding', transfusion reactions or adverse events between pathogen-reduced and standard platelets. For a range of laboratory outcomes the results indicated evidence of some benefits for standard platelets over pathogen-reduced platelets. These conclusions are based on data from 1422 patients included in 10 trials. Results from ongoing or new trials are required to determine if there are clinically important differences in bleeding risk between pathogen-reduced platelet transfusions and standard platelet transfusions. Given the variability in trial design, bleeding assessment and quality of outcome reporting, it is recommended that future trials apply standardised approaches to outcome assessment and follow-up, including safety reporting.

UVC Irradiation for Pathogen Reduction of Platelet Concentrates and Plasma

Besides the current efforts devoted to microbial risk reduction, pathogen inactivation technologies promise reduction of the residual risk of known and emerging infectious agents. A novel pathogen reduction process for platelets, the THERAFLEX UV-Platelets system, has been developed and is under clinical evaluation for its efficacy and safety. In addition, proof of principle has been shown for UVC treatment of plasma units. The pathogen reduction process is based on application of UVC light of a specific wavelength (254 nm) combined with intense agitation of the blood units to ensure a uniform treatment of all blood compartments. Due to the different absorption characteristics of nucleic acids and proteins, UVC irradiation mainly affects the nucleic acid of pathogens and leukocytes while proteins are largely preserved. UVC treatment significantly reduces the infectivity of platelet units contaminated by disease-causing viruses and bacteria. In addition, it inactivates residual white blood cells in the blood components while preserving platelet function and coagulation factors. Since no photoactive compound needs to be added to the blood units, photoreagent-related adverse events are excluded. Because of its simple and rapid procedure without the need to change the established blood component preparation procedures, UVC-based pathogen inactivation could easily be implemented in existing blood banking procedures.

In vitro effects on platelets irradiated with short-wave ultraviolet light without any additional photoactive reagent using the THERAFLEX UV-Platelets method

BACKGROUND

A novel short-wave ultraviolet light (UVC) pathogen reduction technology (THERAFLEX UV-Platelets; MacoPharma, Mouvaux, France) without the need of any additional photoactive reagent has recently been evaluated for various bacteria and virus infectivity assays. The use of UVC alone has on the one hand been shown to reduce pathogens but may, on the other hand, have some impact on the platelet (PLT) quality. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential effects on PLT quality of pathogen inactivation treatment using the novel UVC method for PLT concentrates.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Buffy-coat-derived PLTs suspended in SSP+ were irradiated with UVC light in plastic bags (MacoPharma) made of ethyl vinyl acetate, considered to be highly permeable to UVC light. The UVC-treated (test, n=8) as well as the untreated (reference, n=8) PLT units were stored in PLT storage bags composed of n-butyryl, tri n-hexyl citrate-plasticized polyvinyl chloride (MacoPharma) on a flat bed agitator for in vitro testing during 7 days of storage.

RESULTS

No significant difference in PLT counts and lactate dehydrogenase between the groups was detected. During storage, glucose decreased more and lactate increased more in the test units. Statistically significant differences were found for glucose (P<0·01) and lactate (P<0·05) on day 7. ATP levels were higher (P<0·01 from day 5) in the reference units. With exception of day 7 (P<0·01 reference vs. test), hypotonic shock response reactivity was not different between groups. Extent of shape change was lower (P<0·01), and CD62P (P<0·05 day 5) was higher in the test units. CD42b and CD41/61 showed similar trends throughout storage, without any significant difference between the units. pH was maintained at >6·8 (day 7) and swirling remained at the highest level (score = 2) for all units throughout storage.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that irradiation with UVC light has a slight impact on PLT in vitro quality and appears to be insignificant with regard to current in vitro standards.

Pathogen inactivation of human serum facilitates its clinical use for islet cell culture and subsequent transplantation

Serum is regarded as an essential supplement to promote survival and growth of cells during culture. However, the potential risk of transmitting diseases disqualifies the use of serum for clinical cell therapy in most countries. Hence, most clinical cell therapy programs have replaced human serum with human serum albumin, which can result in inferior quality of released cell products. Photochemical treatment of different blood products utilizing Intercept® technology has been shown to inactivate a broad variety of pathogens of RNA and DNA origin. The present study assesses the feasibility of using pathogen-inactivated, blood group-compatible serum for use in human pancreatic islet culture. Isolated human islets were cultured at 37°C for 3-4 days in CMRL 1066 supplemented with 10% of either pathogen-inactivated or nontreated human serum. Islet quality assessment included glucose-stimulated insulin release (perifusion), ADP/ATP ratio, cytokine expression, and posttransplant function in diabetic nude mice. No differences were found between islets cultured in pathogen-inactivated or control serum regarding stimulated insulin release, intracellular insulin content, and ADP/ATP ratio. Whether media was supplemented with treated or nontreated serum, islet expression of IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, or tissue factor was not affected. The final diabetes-reversal rate of mice receiving islets cultured in pathogen-inactivated or nontreated serum was 78% and 87%, respectively (NS). As reported here, pathogen-inactivated human serum does not affect viability or functional integrity of cultured human islets. The implementation of this technology for RNA- and DNA-based pathogen inactivation should enable reintroduction of human serum for clinical cell therapy.

The status of pathogen-reduced plasma

Efforts to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases began more than 4 decades ago with testing donated blood for syphilis. During the subsequent 4 decades, the number of recognized blood-borne transmissible agents and new laboratory tests has proliferated to a logistical breaking point. Further, the number of "emerging agents" which might enter the donor population is increasing continuously. In the search for an alternative to the laboratory testing strategy, pathogen-reduction technologies have emerged as the most promising. The model for this paradigm is pasteurization of a bottle of cow's milk. No matter what infective agent may be present in freshly collected cow's milk, pasteurization, i.e., a generic purification process can eliminate all potential infectivity, while preserving its essential biological properties--and an affordable cost. Several manufacturers have undertaken the challenge of developing a pathogen-reduction technology for blood components. Some novel technologies have proven successful for pooled plasma derivatives such as immune globulins, coagulation factor concentrate concentrates and albumin. The greatest challenge is finding a technology that is suitable for red blood cell and platelet components, whereas significant progress has been made already for pathogen-reduced plasma products. The present review addresses the status of implementation of pathogen-reduced plasma products in the global market. Some blood centers and hospital blood banks in Europe and the Middle East have begun to distribute pathogen-reduced plasma, but no pathogen-reduced plasma product is presently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. While many observers in the United States focus on the regulatory process as the impediment to widespread implementation, the real challenge will be paying the surcharge for the pathogen-reduction process - an as yet unspecified figure - but likely to add a very substantial amount to the annual healthcare budget.

Pathogen-reduction methods: advantages and limits

Pathogen‐reduction (inactivation) provides a proactive approach to reducing transfusion‐transmitted infection. Pathogen‐reduction technologies have been successfully implemented by plasma fractionators resulting in no transmission of human immunodeficiency, hepatitis C, or hepatitis B viruses by US‐licensed plasma derivatives since 1987. Fractionation technologies cannot be used to treat cellular blood components. Although blood donor screening, deferral and disease testing have drastically reduced the incidence of transfusion‐transmitted diseases, the threat of new or re‐emerging pathogens remains. Of particular concern is the silent emergence of a new agent with a prolonged latent period in which asymptomatic infected carriers would donate and spread infection. The ultimate goal of pathogen‐inactivation is to reduce transmission of potential pathogens without significantly compromising the therapeutic efficacy of the cellular and protein constituents of blood. The acceptable technology must not introduce toxicities into the blood supply nor result in neoantigen formation and subsequent antibody production. Several promising pathogen‐inactivation technologies are being developed and tested, and others are currently in use, but all of them have limits. Pathogen‐reduction promises an additional ‘layer of protection’ from infectious agents and has the potential to impact the safety of blood transfusions worldwide.

Assessment of safety in neonates for transfusion of platelets and plasma prepared with amotosalen photochemical pathogen inactivation treatment by a 1-month intravenous toxicity study in neonatal rats

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that approximately 300,000 neonates undergo transfusions annually. The neonatal immune system is immature, making such patients more susceptible to the effects associated with transfusion-transmitted bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and white blood cells (WBCs). The INTERCEPT Blood System is a photochemical process (PCT) utilizing amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet to inactivate pathogens and WBCs in both platelet (PLT) and plasma components for transfusion. A series of clinical studies has shown PCT PLTs and PCT plasma to be safe and effective for transfusion in adults and pediatric patients. Because clinical studies in neonates are technically difficult and ethically challenging, preclinical toxicologic studies were conducted in neonatal rats to evaluate the safety of PCT blood components for neonates.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study examined daily intravenous administration to neonatal rats of amotosalen in 35 percent:65 percent plasma:InterSol from 1 microg per kg per day (representing 1-unit transfusion) to 457 microg per kg per day (representing multiple transfusions) from Postnatal Day 4 (PND4) to PND31. Rats were observed for viability, clinical signs, and body weights until PND31 and then subjected to pathology evaluation. Hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis data were also collected on PND31. Toxicokinetic parameters were evaluated on PND4 and PND31.

RESULTS

There were no amotosalen-related effects on clinical signs, body weight, hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, gross pathology, or histopathology, despite the exposure of neonatal rats to amotosalen concentrations as high as approximately 48 times the standard exposure in adult patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the safety of PCT for transfusion in neonatal rats and augments data from other studies and clinical use supporting the use of PCT in neonatal patients.

Proceedings of a Consensus Conference: pathogen inactivation-making decisions about new technologies

Significant progress has been made in reducing the risk of pathogen transmission to transfusion recipients. Nonetheless, there remains a continuing risk of transmission of viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and prions to recipients. These include many of the viruses for which specific screening tests exist as well as pathogens for which testing is currently not being done, including various species of bacteria, babesiosis, variant Creutzfeld-Jacob disease, hepatitis A virus, human herpes virus 8, chikungunya virus, Chagas disease, and malaria. Pathogen inactivation (PI) technologies potentially provide an additional way to protect the blood supply from emerging agents and also provide additional protection against both known and as-yet-unidentified agents. However, the impact of PI on product quality and recipient safety remains to be determined. The purpose of this consensus conference was to bring together international experts in an effort to consider the following issues with respect to PI: implementation criteria; licensing requirements; blood service and clinical issues; risk management issues; cost-benefit impact; and research requirements. These proceedings are provided to make available to the transfusion medicine community the considerable amount of important information presented at this consensus conference.

Coagulation function in fresh-frozen plasma prepared with two photochemical treatment methods: methylene blue and amotosalen

BACKGROUND

Pathogen inactivation of plasma intended for transfusion is now the standard of care in Belgium. Two methods for treatment of single plasma units are available: amotosalen plus ultraviolet A light and methylene blue plus visible light. This study compared the quality and stability of plasma treated with these two methods.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma units made from a pool of two ABO-matched fresh apheresis units were photochemically treated with either amotosalen (PCT-FFP) or methylene blue (MB-FFP). A total of 12 paired samples were evaluated. Plasma coagulation function was assessed at three time points: immediately after treatment, after 30 days of frozen storage, and an additional 24 hours at 4 degrees C after thawing. Comparison between PCT-FFP and MB-FFP was assessed with the paired t test and a p value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

Based on statistical analysis, mean levels of factor (F)II, FXII, FXIII, von Willebrand antigen, ADAMTS-13, D-dimers, and protein C were equivalent between PCT-FFP and MB-FFP for all three time points. PCT-FFP exhibited shorter mean prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time (two time points), and thrombin time and higher mean levels of fibrinogen, FXI, and protein S than MB-FFP. Retention of FV, FVII, FVIII, FX, or von Willebrand factor:ristocetin cofactor in PCT-FFP was either equivalent to or higher than MB-FFP. MB-FFP contained higher mean levels of plasminogen, antithrombin, and plasmin inhibitor than PCT-FFP. Retention of F IX in MB-FFP was higher than PCT-FFP only after the 4 degrees C storage after thawing.

CONCLUSION

There is adequate preservation of therapeutic coagulation factor activities in both PCT-FFP and MB-FFP. The overall coagulation factor levels and stability of PCT-FFP were better preserved than MB-FFP.

Pathogen inactivation: the definitive safeguard for the blood supply

CONTEXT

Pathogen inactivation provides a proactive approach to cleansing the blood supply. In the plasma fractionation and manufacturing industry, pathogen inactivation technologies have been successfully implemented resulting in no transmission of human immunodeficiency, hepatitis C, or hepatitis B viruses by US-licensed plasma derivatives since 1985. However, these technologies cannot be used to pathogen inactivate cellular blood components. Although current blood donor screening and disease testing has drastically reduced the incidence of transfusion-transmitted diseases, there still looms the threat to the blood supply of a new or reemerging pathogen. Of particular concern is the silent emergence of a new agent with a prolonged latent period in which asymptomatic infected carriers would donate and spread infection.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the principles, challenges, achievements, prospective technologies, and future goals of pathogen inactivation of the blood supply.

DATA SOURCES

The current published English-language literature from 1968 through 2006 and a historical landmark article from 1943 are integrated into a review of this subject.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultimate goal of pathogen inactivation is to maximally reduce the transmission of potential pathogens without significantly compromising the therapeutic efficacy of the cellular and protein constituents of blood. This must be accomplished without introducing toxicities into the blood supply and without causing neoantigen formation and subsequent antibody production. Several promising pathogen inactivation technologies are being developed and clinically tested, and others are currently in use. Pathogen inactivation offers additional layers of protection from infectious agents that threaten the blood supply and has the potential to impact the safety of blood transfusions worldwide.

Update on pathogen reduction technology for therapeutic plasma: An overview

Human plasma for therapeutic use, besides having optimal viral safety, must contain optimal levels of all coagulation factors and protease inhibitors to be clinically effective. Several new technologies for pathogen reduction of plasma (PRT) exist and are entering the stage of clinical testing. The main objective of this overview is to provide an update on the current states of three promising photoactive technologies that target pathogen nucleic acid for pathogen inactivation, applicable to single unit fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and to highlight the experiences gained with classical pathogen reduction of pooled plasma using solvent-detergent (SD) treatment. It should be emphasized that none of the currently applied methods inactivate all types of pathogens and all have some effect on plasma quality when compared to fresh-frozen plasma. Pooled SD-plasma is the best documented clinical product, followed by methylene blue light treated (MBLT)-plasma. Recently, Psoralen light treated (PLT)-plasma has been introduced (CE-marked product in Europe) while Riboflavin light treated (RLT)-plasma is still under development. In principal, PRT for plasma not only differs in terms of the spectrum and log of pathogen reduction potential, but also in respect to the physicochemical/biological characteristics, and profiles of the adverse reactions, particularly in vulnerable patient groups. Therefore, an additional practical step such as oil extraction followed by chromatography to remove the solvent/detergent, and filtration or the use of some special absorbing matrix is required to reduce the residual photosensitive chemicals, their metabolites and photo adducts. This is required to improve the safety margin of the final product. Moreover, while it may be convenient to think that a combined pathogen reduction technology could improve the spectrum of known pathogens to be inactivated, one needs, in practice, to balance between the degree of pathogen reduction and the loss of some plasma protein activity. From the quality point of view, SD-plasma is a pooled standardized pharmaceutical product with extensive in-process control. However, both differences in production processes and the plasma source can influence final product quality. On the other hand, single unit plasma derived from nucleic acid PRT cannot be monitored by pharmaceutical process control and demonstrates the wide range of concentrations normally observed for plasma proteins. Pooling has the disadvantage that one single plasma unit can contaminate a whole pool, but this can be offset by several advantages that pooling and the SD process offer. Among these are reduction of a possible pathogen load by dilution and by neutralizing antibodies in the plasma pool, dilution and possible neutralization of antibodies and allergens which essentially eliminates transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and reduces allergic reactions significantly, removal of residual blood cells, cell fragments and bacteria, and removal of the largest von Willebrand-factor (vWF) molecules. On the other hand, some streamlining is required for technologies using single units of plasma, such as the use of plasma from male non-transfused donors to reduce TRALI and to avoid the O blood group in order to meet current specifications for FFP [Seghatchian J. What is happening? Are the current acceptance criteria for therapeutic plasma adequate? Transfus Apheresis Sci 2004; 31:67-79], and to exploit the potential benefit to inactivate residual lymphocytes and prevent transfusion-associated graft versus host disease. The cost effectiveness of pathogen inactivation is very low (> 2 million US dollar/life year saved), if however, non-infectious complications such as TRALI are taken into account; the cost for SDP is reduced to < 50,000 British pound/life year saved for those 48 years. Finally, from the therapeutic standpoint, two important questions still remain to be answered. First, whether the various pathogen reduced plasma products are clinically interchangeable and second, whether the conventional quality requirements of FFP are still adequate for the newer plasma products. These questions can only be answered by a head to head comparison, followed by large-scale clinical trials.

Risks and side effects of therapy with plasma and plasma fractions

Transfusion of plasma can lead to adverse reactions or events. Immune-mediated reactions are most common--these include allergic and anaphylactic reactions, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and haemolysis. They can range in severity from mild to fatal. Fluid overload and citrate toxicity can occur after rapid or massive transfusion. In developed countries, microbial transmission rates are low because of donor selection and testing. Pathogen reduction processes can be applied to either single-unit components (methylene blue) or plasma pools (solvent-detergent). They have the unwanted effect of reducing some coagulation factors but reduce viral transmission risk even further. Reactions associated with plasma products or fractions also include allergic reactions, although TRALI is rare. Viral transmission risk is very low because of the use of two independent viral inactivation steps. Different products have particular specific unwanted effects: intravenous immunoglobulin has been associated with thrombotic events, renal toxicity and aseptic meningitis; coagulation factors are associated with development of inhibitors and thrombotic events. The risk of transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in both plasma components and pooled plasma products is as yet unknown. If anything, the low titre of prion infectivity in the blood of an infected individual (approximately 10 infectious units/ml) will be massively diluted by the thousands of units of plasma in the pool. Subsequent manufacturing processes also remove prions from the final product.

Pathogen inactivation techniques

The desire to rid the blood supply of pathogens of all types has led to the development of many technologies aimed at the same goal--eradication of the pathogen(s) without harming the blood cells or generating toxic chemical agents. This is a very ambitious goal, and one that has yet to be achieved. One approach is to shun the 'one size fits all' concept and to target pathogen-reduction agents at the Individual component types. This permits the development of technologies that might be compatible with, for example, plasma products but that would be cytocidal and thus incompatible with platelet concentrates or red blood cell units. The technologies to be discussed include solvent detergent and methylene blue treatments--designed to inactivate plasma components and derivatives; psoralens (S-59--amotosalen) designed to pathogen-reduce units of platelets; and two products aimed at red blood cells, S-303 (a Frale--frangible anchor-linker effector compound) and Inactine (a binary ethyleneimine). A final pathogen-reduction material that might actually allow one material to inactivate all three blood components--riboflavin (vitamin B2)--is also under development. The sites of action of the amotosalen (S-59), the S-303 Frale, Inactine, and riboflavin are all localized in the nucleic acid part of the pathogen. Solvent detergent materials act by dissolving the plasma envelope, thus compromising the integrity of the pathogen membrane and rendering it non-infectious. By disrupting the pathogen's ability to replicate or survive, its infectivity is removed. The degree to which bacteria and viruses are affected by a particular pathogen-reducing technology relates to its Gram-positive or Gram-negative status, to the sporulation characteristics for bacteria, and the presence of lipid or protein envelopes for viruses. Concerns related to photoproducts and other breakdown products of these technologies remain, and the toxicology of pathogen-reduction treatments is a major ongoing area of investigation. Clearly, regulatory agencies have a major role to play in the evaluation of these new technologies. This chapter will cover the several types of pathogen-reduction systems, mechanisms of action, the inactivation efficacy for specific types of pathogens, toxicology of the various systems and the published research and clinical trial data supporting their potential usefulness. Due to the nature of the field, pathogen reduction is a work in progress and this review should be considered as a snapshot in time rather than a clear picture of what the future will bring.

Clinical safety of platelets photochemically treated with amotosalen HCl and ultraviolet A light for pathogen inactivation: the SPRINT trial

BACKGROUND

A photochemical treatment (PCT) method utilizing a novel psoralen, amotosalen HCl, with ultraviolet A illumination has been developed to inactivate viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and white blood cells in platelet (PLT) concentrates. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, Phase III trial (SPRINT) evaluated hemostatic efficacy and safety of PCT apheresis PLTs compared to untreated conventional (control) apheresis PLTs in 645 thrombocytopenic oncology patients requiring PLT transfusion support. Hemostatic equivalency was demonstrated. The proportion of patients with Grade 2 bleeding was not inferior for PCT PLTs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To further assess the safety of PCT PLTs, the adverse event (AE) profile of PCT PLTs transfused in the SPRINT trial is reported. Safety assessments included transfusion reactions, AEs, and deaths in patients treated with PCT or control PLTs in the SPRINT trial.

RESULTS

A total of 4719 study PLT transfusions were given (2678 PCT and 2041 control). Transfusion reactions were significantly fewer following transfusion of PCT than control PLTs (3.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.02). Overall AEs (99.7% PCT vs. 98.2% control), Grade 3 or 4 AEs (79% PCT vs. 79% control), thrombotic AEs (3.8% PCT vs. 3.7% control), and deaths (3.5% PCT vs. 5.2% control) were comparable between treatment groups. Minor hemorrhagic AEs (petechiae [39% PCT vs. 29% control; p < 0.01] and fecal occult blood [33% PCT vs. 25% control; p = 0.03]) and skin rashes (56% PCT vs. 42% control; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the PCT group.

CONCLUSION

The overall safety profile of PCT PLTs was comparable to untreated PLTs.

Fresh frozen plasma prepared with amotosalen HCl (S-59) photochemical pathogen inactivation: transfusion of patients with congenital coagulation factor deficiencies

BACKGROUND

Photochemical treatment (PCT) with amotosalen HCl (S-59) was developed to inactivate pathogens and white blood cells in plasma (PCT-FFP) used for transfusion support.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

An open-label, multicenter trial was conducted in patients with congenital coagulation factor deficiencies (factors [F]I, FII, FV, FVII, FX, FXI, and FXIII and protein C) to measure the kinetics of specific coagulation factors, hemostatic efficacy, and safety of PCT-FFP. Posttransfusion prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and clinical hemostasis were evaluated before and after PCT-FFP transfusions.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients received 107 transfusions of PCT-FFP for kinetic studies or therapeutic indications (mean dose, 12.8 +/- 8.5 mL/kg). Incremental factor recoveries ranged from 0.9 to 2.4 IU per dL per IU per kg (FII, FV, FVII, FX, FXI, and protein C). Mean pretransfusion PT (20.7 +/- 22.2 sec) corrected after PCT-FFP (13.8 +/- 2.4 sec, p < 0.001). Mean pretransfusion PTT (51.2 +/- 29.3 sec) corrected after PCT-FFP (32.0 +/- 5.1 sec, p < 0.001). Thirteen patients required 77 transfusions for therapeutic indications. PCT-FFP provided effective hemostasis and was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacement coagulation factors in PCT-FFP exhibited kinetics and therapeutic efficacy consistent with conventional FFP.

Facilitating T-cell immune reconstitution after haploidentical transplantation in adults

Delayed reconstitution of cellular immunity following T-cell-depleted, CD34-enriched, allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality following haploidentical transplantation in adults. This is illustrated in our recent study of 28 high-risk adult patients (median age 31) who were treated with conditioning regimens containing antithymocyte globulin (ATG) before T-cell-depleted, CD34-enriched allogeneic HPCT. Overall mortality was 93% (26/28 patients) with a median survival of 4 months posttransplant. Poor cellular immune reconstitution contributed to death of 21/28 patients, with eight deaths due to opportunistic infections and seven deaths due to relapse. While recovery of normal numbers of circulating NK cells and B-cells occurred within the first 1-2 months posttransplant, recovery of normal numbers of blood T-cells was suppressed for more than 1 year. The mean half-life of active ATG levels in serum was 6 days; rapid clearance suggested that residual ATG did not contribute to the delay of posttransplant T-cell reconstitution. Rapid T-cell reconstitution was seen only in younger patients, indicating that poor thymic function and the absence of T-cells in the graft are the major causes of delayed recovery of cellular immunity. Improved cellular immunity after T-cell-depleted haploidentical HPCT will thus require novel strategies to adoptively transfer antigen specific donor T-cells without inducing lethal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This problem has been addressed in a preclinical murine model of MHC-mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Donor T-cells treated ex vivo with fludarabine or a UVA light-activated psoralen compound (amotosalen) have a markedly reduced ability to induce GvHD, yet the treated T-cells confer protection against murine cytomegalovirus and an infused leukemic cell line. Polyclonal donor T-cells reconstituted the blood and lymphoid compartments posttransplant and expanded in vivo. Derivatives of ex-vivo-treated donor T-cells retained the ability to produce cytokines and proliferate in response to antigen challenge. The mechanism of reduced GvHD potential of ex-vivo-treated T-cells appears to be selection of a subset of memory donor T-cells that do not initially home to secondary lymphoid organs and have reduced capacity for producing inflammation in the immediate posttransplant period. Direct selection of the memory subset by high-speed FACS confirmed the improved therapeutic index in the murine model system. Preclinical data indicate the feasibility of treating human T-cells with fludarabine, psoralen, or direct selection based upon the memory phenotype to efficiently produce a population of polyclonal donor T-cells with reduced GvHD activity. A planned clinical phase 1 trial of adoptive therapy utilizing ex vivo psoralen-treated donor T-cells in recipients of T-cell-depleted haploidentical HPCT is presented.