Necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis with mucinosis

A Case Report of Necrotizing Eosinophilic Folliculitis Occurring After Rhus Ingestion

Necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis is known as a rare variant of eosinophilic folliculitis (EF). It differs from classic EF because of its necrotizing ulcerative clinical course. We report a case of necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis accompanied by pathergic phenomenon that may be the result of a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction occurring after Rhus consumption. Painful pyodermic plaques developed in a 48-year-old man, over a 5-day period, which was associated with facial edema. The lesions appeared 2 days after ingestion of Rhus. His face showed multiple painful pruritic papules that coalesced into crusted plaque accompanied by hemorrhagic eschars. At the periphery of the plaques, multiple erythematous papules and pustules were noticed. Prominent tissue eosinophilia was noticed from the skin biopsy samples. Also, there were areas of follicular mucinosis and eosinophilic folliculitis as well as hemorrhagic scale crust over the surface. Based on the clinical and histologic findings, the patient was diagnosed as necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis occurring after Rhus ingestion. The lesions rapidly cleared after starting treatment with systemic steroid and dapsone. Clinicians should be aware that necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis may occur after Rhus contact or consumption, in order to diagnose and treat patients promptly and reduce patient discomfort and skin scarring.

Necrotizing Infundibular Crystalline Folliculitis: A Case Report of an Exceptional Lesion of Unknown Etiology

Necrotizing infundibular crystalline folliculitis is a rare follicular lesion of which the etiology is not well understood. Here we describe the case of a 71-year-old male patient presenting with multiple hyperkeratotic lesions localized on the forehead. Histopathological analysis of one of the lesions revealed a follicular invagination containing cellular debris and keratin lamellae containing filamentous mucinous material and numerous crystals birefringent in polarized light microscopy.

The Spectrum of Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Findings in Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides

BACKGROUND

Since the original designation of folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) as a distinct entity, there has been an increasing appreciation of the broad clinical and histopathologic spectrum with which this disease can present. However, there have been few large histologic studies characterizing the various histopathologic patterns.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we attempt to describe the histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 47 biopsy specimens from 34 patients with FMF.

METHODS

We searched our lymphoma database for patients with FMF in which detailed histopathologic information and slides as well as clinical information was available for review. Additionally, immunohistochemical studies for CD4, CD8, and CD1a were performed in all cases in which the block was available.

RESULTS

In addition to the prototypical pattern of a folliculotropic lypmphoid infiltrate with or without mucinosis, the histologic features of follicular mycosis fungoides may include a granulomatous reaction, cystic and comedonal changes, an eosinophilic folliculitis pattern and basaloid folliculolymphoid hyperplasia as well as pustular changes, interface dermatitis and an interstitial dermatitislike pattern. Unlike conventional mycosis fungoides, eosinophils and plasma cells are conspicuous within the accompanying reactive infiltrate. We have also noted an exceedingly high number of Langerhans cells within the follicular epithelium. The CD4:CD8 ratio frequently is 10:1 or greater and the follicles show abundant CD1a positive cells.

CONCLUSIONS

FMF may present with a broad spectrum of histopathologic changes including interstitial, granulomatous, fibrotic and acneiform reactions that may lack the typical histologic attributes of a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Recognition of these myriad of histologic presentations can be of great diagnostic utility.

Successful treatment of recalcitrant necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis using indomethacin and cephalexin

A 56-year-old man presented with a 4-month history of a painful and pruritic eruption consisting of crusted plaques and blisters on his face, scalp and chest. The patient suffered from headaches and malaise but was afebrile. Two skin biopsies revealed an epidermis which was eroded and covered by locules of serum and neutrophils. In the underlying dermis, there was a marked mixed inflammatory reaction including lymphocytes, neutrophils and numerous eosinophils. There was exocytosis of eosinophils into several follicles with areas of follicular mucinosis. A diagnosis of necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis was made based upon the clinical and histopathological findings. The diagnosis was supported by the rapid response to a combination of indomethacin and cephalexin. The patient has taken continuous indomethacin (with rabeprazole and misoprostol cover) and cephalexin for 2 years. If treatment is withdrawn he experiences a flare of his disease within 2 weeks. This case highlights the potentially chronic nature of this disease.

Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis: a 40 year retrospect

Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (EPF) is a noninfectious eosinophilic infiltration of hair follicles first described 40 years ago. There are 3 variants: classic EPF, immunosuppression-associated (mostly HIV-related), and infancy-associated EPF. EPF has been classified as an AIDS-defining illness. In both children and adults EPF should be viewed as a possible cutaneous sign of immunosuppression. However, it may also be seen in persons with normal immune status. We review EPF on the 40th anniversary of its original description.